Closer Look at Hutchison Effect, Exotic Accelerants, Tesla Technology as Relates to 9/11 [Archive]

View Full Version : Closer Look at Hutchison Effect, Exotic Accelerants, Tesla Technology as Relates to 9/11

Tesla_WTC_Solution

8th January 2013, 02:24

JOHN HUTCHISON, SCIENTIST AND AUTODIDACT EXTRAORDINAIRE

http://www.doctorkoontz.com/Scalar_Physics/John%20Hutchison/Hutchison_files/tita.jpg

tes says:

I want to talk at length about the history of arson in America and England, the outbreak of strange arsons in Washington state over the last 30 years involving weapons tests and exotic accelerants that led to the deaths of countless firemen, much like the tragic events of 9-11 2001.

Not to mention, the use of Fenian fire, thermite, optical heat methods, turpentine, and guncotton etc. has been around for hundreds if not thousands of years.

From the London fire of 1666 to the Great Seattle fire of teh 1890s to the events of 9/11, arson has defined the building and rebuilding of both england and america over the long hard centuries. and in almost every case, minorities were blamed and suffered.

on 1/19/1999 the decision to hand over key weapons systems from GE to marconi/bae/bp was completed. the actual handover took place some months later after this initial meeting and agreement.

on 9/11/2001 the WTC towers and building 7 collapsed into a pool of molten steel.
but there was no explosion really, no fire to speak of at the bottom of the towers.
unless the steel was as crappy as some say, there is no way these buildings could have fallen without an extra push.

in 2012 i think, John Hutchison posted a youtube video explaining how with a Helical waveform you can warp a steel or iron ingot without generating heat.

of course if you did generate heat the effect would be more severe with better iron.

i am busy tonight but will write more later on this topic as it is interesting and led to the death and imprisonment of many innocent people. :sad: including the late Fred Bell who leaked this amazing story (after I wrote about it of course LOL) to Jesse Ventura.

my own blog was removed after an anonymous person filed a DCMA complaint against me on account of my told ya so tesla article.

i believed i had heard indirectly from the departed tesla and he told me about titanic, hindenburg, and other secrets that involved his technology being abused.

sad world.
but love is only a breath away.

http://files.abovetopsecret.com/images/member/e4d71c7ead70.jpg

http://dvice.com/assets_c/2012/06/oam_spiral-thumb-330x216-94577.jpg

http://www.csulb.edu/~rdayers/Kinetic_Waves/MATLAB%20(Damped_Helical_Wave).gif

http://i.ytimg.com/vi/mEoNFGwWO-k/0.jpg

edit: corrected bae to read GE handed over to BAE :jaw: :tape2:

Weird Science: The Hutchison Effect

Written on December 28 2012
Tags: bizarre, Funny Videos
You can leave a response to this post.

Some weird science today, involving something called The Hutchison Effect. John Hutchison is a Canadian inventor, a kind of mad-scientist type who supposedly can make metal objects levitate.

http://oddculture.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/02/hutchison_effect2.jpg

3LhvpC2lsCs

tnBdhsXl088

SnowyOwl

8th January 2013, 03:03

Quote It's time to overgrow the Fed!!! ..and time to accelerate the vanishing of Cast, Class, Monopoly, Cartels, Central powers, inheritors of riches, the privatisation of profit and the socialisation of charges. IDLE NO MORE http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?54096-Idle-no-more-First-Nations-of-the-American-Hemisphere-are-mad-as-hell-and-can-t-take-it-anymore Snowy

Tesla_WTC_Solution

9th January 2013, 18:31

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/3/32/Traqueur_acquisition.JPG/220px-Traqueur_acquisition.JPG
Helical antenna taken from wikipedia commons.

A helical antenna is an antenna consisting of a conducting wire wound in the form of a helix. In most cases, helical antennas are mounted over a ground plane. The feed line is connected between the bottom of the helix and the ground plane. Helical antennas can operate in one of two principal modes: normal mode or axial mode.

Here is what I understand to be the Hutchison webpage:

http://www.hutchisoneffect.ca/

John Hutchison's life changed drastically in 1979 when, upon starting up an array of high-voltage equipment, he felt something hit his shoulder. He threw the piece of metal back to where it seemed to have originated, and it flew up and hit him again. This was how he originally discovered fundamental frequencies can shield gravity. When his Tesla coils, electrostatic generator, and other equipment created a complex electromagnetic field, heavy pieces of metal levitated and shot toward the ceiling, and some pieces shredded. Upon analysis and thorough investigation, the Canadian government dubbed this phenomenon the Hutchison-Effect.
_________________________________

Helical Particle Waves

http://www.geocities.ws/aliadams/helicalwave.htm

Helical Particle Waves
J.L Gaasenbeek 1986
Summary and Speculations by Ali Adams 2001

Motivation

The concept of electromagnetic waves having frequency, wavelength and amplitude is easily understood today. However physicists are not able to explain how a stream of photons (or other relativistic particles) could have such frequency, wavelength and amplitude. This is why the duality of light and its ability to behave both as a stream of particles and as a wave remained a mystery until Mr J.L Gaasenbeek first proposed his Helical Particle Wave theory in 1986.
...
...
...Kinetic Energy

Helical photons consume external acceleration energy in three distinct parts:

spin momentum (around their own axis),
linear momentum (limited to the speed of light), and
angular momentum (which determines their helical amplitude and frequency).
Accelerating a helical photon towards the speed of light increases its spin and angular momentums but not its linear momentum, as photons cannot overtake each other. Immediately after leaving its source, a photon has to fall in step with other photons and therefore its linear velocity cannot exceed the speed of the light c or 299792458 m/s in this universe. Other concurrent space-time-sharing universes may each have its own unique constant to avoid interacting with each other.

______________________________

WLAN utilizes Helical waveforms

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/2/25/Helical_antenna.jpg/220px-Helical_antenna.jpg

Helical antenna for WLAN communication, working frequency app. 2.4 GHz

A wireless local area network (WLAN) links two or more devices using some wireless distribution method (typically spread-spectrum or OFDM radio), and usually providing a connection through an access point to the wider Internet. This gives users the mobility to move around within a local coverage area and still be connected to the network. Most modern WLANs are based on IEEE 802.11 standards, marketed under the Wi-Fi brand name.

______________________________________

The Norway Spiral and possible helical beam tests:

http://ut-images.s3.amazonaws.com/wp-content/uploads/2009/12/Norway-light-580x386.jpg

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/2009_Norwegian_spiral_anomaly

The Norwegian spiral anomaly of 2009[1] appeared in the night sky over Norway[2] on 9 December 2009. It was visible from, and photographed from, northern Norway and Sweden. The spiral consisted of a blue beam of light with a greyish spiral emanating from one end of it. The light could be seen in all of Trøndelag to the south (the two red counties on the map to the right) and all across the three northern counties which compose Northern Norway,[3] as well as from Northern Sweden[1] and it lasted for 2–3 minutes.[3] According to sources, it looked like a blue light coming from behind a mountain, stopping in mid-air, and starting to spiral outwards.[4][5] A similar, though less spectacular event had also occurred in Norway the month before.[6] Both events had the expected visual features of failed flights of Russian SLBM RSM-56 Bulava missiles,[7][8] and the Russian Defence Ministry acknowledged shortly after that such an event had taken place on 9 December.[9]
________________________________
http://www.abovetopsecret.com/forum/thread889300/pg2

A post of MINE taken from an antimatter propulsion dialogie on ATS before I was bannnnnnnnned!

reply posted on 23-10-2012 @ 07:42 PM by KhufuKeplerTriangle
Originally posted by Kashai

Latest simulation shows that the magnetic nozzles required for antimatter propulsion could be vastly more efficient than previously thought--and built with today's technologies.

So these guys focus on the exhaust velocity--the speed of the particles produced in matter-antimatter annihilations as they leave the rocket engine.

Any thoughts?
This sounds like an anti-matter version of NASA's VSMPD Thruster.
That stands for Varied-SPecific MagnetoPlasmaDynamic Thrust.
It's an engine that uses a magnetic field to accelerate ionized particles through a chamber, and of course they are going pretty fast on the way out.

To this point the hazard has been, the ionized trail of crap. They have been working to reduce the waste.
However this new breakthrough from CERN could change everything. I am so happy they are working now toward helping humans off the rock.

For a long time I was very sure CERN was just there to police the internet and track paranormal, and to take our money while promising breakthroughs on immovable theories from Einstein's dusty tomes.

This is super exciting news, thanks a lot for posting this, made my day actually.

how often do we get to say anything NICE about CERN lol?

norway spiral looks like ET to me, or an attempt at weapon system/defensive shield or an attempt by earth to send emergency broadcast to another star system.
why we would need to do that is beyond me.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

9th January 2013, 18:44

P.s. if you are interested in helping petition to restore a crazy person's blog from wordpress deletion,
please put in a word for me at the following link: http://en.support.wordpress.com/suspended-blogs/

the site's name was nuclearnuttery and i am not asking for you to vouch for the content, only for freedom.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

10th January 2013, 05:58

Accelerants play a major role in chemistry. Most chemical reactions can be hastened with an accelerant. Accelerants alter a chemical bond, speed up a chemical process, or bring organisms back to homeostasis. Accelerants are not necessarily catalysts as they may be consumed by the process. An accelerant can be any substance that can bond, mix, or disturb another substance and cause an increase in the speed of a natural, or artificial chemical process.

Artificial Accelerants and Washington State Mystery Arsons

Excerpts from
The Pocket Guide to Accelerant Evidence Collection

Appendix II: Twenty Common Ignitable Liquids used as Fire Accelerants

This Appendix lists the common & chemical names, chemical formula, definition, important physical properties and common uses of the most frequently encountered ignitable liquids used as arson accelerants. Temperatures are rounded to the nearest full degree. Properties are reported where available from a reliable source.

1. Acetone - (dimethyl ketone, 2-propanone), (C3H6O), flash point -4 degrees F (-20 degrees C); ignition temperature 869 degrees F (465.4 degrees C); explosive limits 2.6%-13.0%; vapor density 2.0; specific gravity 0.792; toxicity (3). A volatile, flammable, colorless, liquid ketone having a fragrant odor and miscible with water, alcohol, and most oils. Principal uses are as a solvent in lacquers, varnishes, cosmetics, nail polish remover, and in the mixture of other solvents.

2. Carbon Disulfide - (carbon disulfide), (CS2) flash point -22 degrees F (-30 degrees C); ignition temperature 212 degrees F (100 degrees C); explosive limits 1.3% to 50%; vapor density 2.6; specific gravity 1.26; toxicity (2). A volatile, flammable, colorless to yellow liquid with a rotten egg odor. Carbon Disulfide, unlike most of the other common ignitable liquids, is heavier than water and will sink.

3. Coleman Fuel - (Coleman fuel C-2538, white gasoline, camping stove fuel, camping lantern fuel); (chemical formula - Coleman fuel is a mixture of hydrocarbons & doesn't have a single formula); flash point -27 degrees F (-33 degrees C); ignition temperature - not reported; explosive limit LEL is 0.7% - UEL not reported; vapor density 3.7; specific gravity .744; toxicity (3). A straight run, unrefined, petroleum distillate used in camping stoves and lanterns. Camp stove fuels in general have a carbon range of C5 - C11.

4. Ethyl Alcohol - (ethanol, grain alcohol), (C2H5OH), flash point 55 degrees F (13 degrees C); ignition temp. 689 degrees F (365 degrees C); explosive limits 3.5%-19.0%; vapor density 1.6; specific gravity 0.8; toxicity (0). A volatile, flammable, colorless liquid having a pleasant odor and miscible in water and many organic liquids. Principal uses are in alcoholic beverages, as a solvent in pharmaceuticals, cleaning preparations, and some antifreezes.

5. Ethyl Ether - (ether, diethyl ether), (C2H5)2O, flash point -49 degrees F (-45 degrees C); ignition temperature 356 degrees F (180 degrees C); explosive limits 1.9% - 36%; vapor density 2.6; specific gravity 0.7; toxicity (2). A volatile, highly flammable, colorless liquid which forms explosive peroxides under the influence of air and light and has a sweetish odor and is slightly miscible in water, methanol, and oils. Principle uses as a solvent in organic synthesis, smokeless powder and industrial solvents.

6. Fuel oil no. 1- (kerosene, range oil, coal oil, Jet - A (aviation) fuel); Chemical formula is a carbon range of C9 - C17; flash point 110 degrees F - 162 degrees F (42 degrees C - 72 degrees C); ignition temp. 410 degrees F (210 degrees C); explosive limits 0.7% - 5%; vapor density .7 - 5; specific gravity 0.81; Toxicity (3). A colorless, combustible, straight run petroleum distillate liquid having a characteristic odor miscible in petroleum solvents and immiscible in water. Principal uses as an ingredient in lamp oils, charcoal starter fluids, jet engine fuels and insecticides. K-1 kerosene has a low sulfur content and is used in portable space heaters.

7. Fuel oil no. 2 (home heating fuel, diesel fuel), Chemical formula is a carbon range of C9 - C23, flash point 126 degrees F-204 degrees F (52 degrees C- 96 degrees C); ignition temperature 494F (257C); explosive limits - not reported; vapor density greater than 1; specific gravity less than 1; toxicity (3). A light brown, combustible, straight run or cracked petroleum distillate consisting mostly of C9 - C23 range hydrocarbons. Principal uses include heating fuel in domestic or commercial atomizing type burners and as a fuel in diesel engines.

8. Gasoline - (gas, motor fuel) Chemical formula - gasoline is a blended mixture of aromatic and aliphatic hydrocarbons; flash point -45 degrees F (-43 degrees C); ignition temp. 536 degrees F (280 degrees C) for 56 - 60 octane grade; explosive limits 1.4%-7.6%; vapor density 3.0 - 4.0; specific gravity 0.8; Toxicity (3). A highly flammable, blended liquid composed of more than 300 volatile hydrocarbon compounds manufactured from the fractionation or distillation of petroleum. Gasoline is the most commonly identified ignitable liquid accelerant reported by American forensic laboratories. Its principal use is as a fuel in spark ignited, internal combustion engines.

9. Isopropyl alcohol- (IPA, isopropanol, 2-propanol), (CH3 CHOHCH3), flash point 54 degrees F (12 degrees C); ignition temp. 750 degrees F (399 degrees C); explosive limits 2.5%-12.0%; vapor density 2.1; and specific gravity 0.79; Toxicity (3). A colorless, flammable liquid which is miscible in water, ether, and alcohol and having a pleasant odor. Principal uses as an ingredient in lacquers, rubbing alcohol, denaturant and lotions.

10. Kerosene - Refer to Fuel Oil #1. Kerosene is identical to Fuel Oil #1 from an investigator's standpoint.

11. Lacquer - Composition and properties of this category of product vary by manufacturer. A spirit varnish such as shellac; any of clear or colored synthetic organic coatings that typically dry to form a film by evaporation of the solvent.

12. Lacquer Thinner - A mixture of highly volatile solvents, miscible in water, of varying composition and properties depending on the manufacturer.

13. Methyl alcohol (methanol, wood alcohol) (CH3OH); flash point 54 degrees F (12 degrees C); ignition temp. 867 degrees F (484 degrees C); explosive limits 6.7% - 36%; vapor density 1.1; specific gravity 0.79; toxicity (4). A colorless, flammable, poisonous liquid having a slight alcohol odor when pure, miscible in water, ethanol, ketones and most other organic solvents. Principal uses as an ingredient in antifreeze, dry gas, windshield washer fluids and as a denaturant in ethanol.

14. Methyl ethyl ketone (MEK,2-butanone) (CH3COCH2CH3); flash point 16 degrees F ( -9 degrees C); ignition temp. 759 degrees F (404 degrees C); explosive limits 1.9%-10.0%; vapor density 2.5; specific gravity O.8; and toxicity (3). A colorless, flammable liquid having an acetone-like odor miscible in alcohol, ether, and slightly soluble in water. Principal use as a solvent in nitrocellulose coatings and lacquers, paint removers, cements and adhesives and in the manufacture of printed circuit boards.

15. Mineral Spirits (see paint thinner)

16. Naphtha (V M & P) A general term which may describe combustible products such as mineral spirits or flammable products such as petroleum ether. The IAAI Forensic Science Committee recommends that the term be avoided. Principle uses of products in this class include thinner in paints and varnishes and as a fuel for pocket lighters. Flash point, explosive limits and other properties vary by manufacturer.

17. Paint Thinner (mineral spirits), Paint thinner or mineral spirits is a complex petroleum distillate; flash point range is listed as 104 degrees F (40 degrees C) - 110 degrees F (43 degrees C); ignition temperature 473 degrees F (245 degrees C); explosive limits 0.8% @ 212 degrees F (100 degrees C); vapor density 3.9; specific gravity 0.8; toxicity (3). A category of clear, combustible liquid having petroleum type odor. Mineral spirits are midrange petroleum distillates ranging from C8 to C12 which is present in many paint thinners, oil base stains, dry cleaning solvents, and some brands of charcoal starter fluids. There may be slight variations in the chemical information provided for different manufacturers.

18. Toluene (methylbenzene, phenylmethane) (C6H5CH3); flash point 40 degrees F (4 degrees C); ignition temp. 896 F (480 degrees C); explosive limits 1.3% -7.0%; vapor density 3.1; specific gravity 0.8; toxicity (2). A colorless, flammable liquid with a benzene-like odor, miscible in alcohol, ether, acetone and very slightly soluble in water. Principal use as a solvent in paints and coatings, paint removers, explosives (TNT), adhesive solvent for model airplanes, and as a base for polyurethane resins.

19. Turpentine (oil of turpentine) (C10H16) - The chemical formula varies with the manufacturer; flash point 90 degrees F-115 degrees F (32 degrees C - 46 degrees C); ignition temp. 488 degrees F (253 degrees C); explosive limit (LEL) .8% - (UEL) not reported ; vapor density less then 1; specific gravity 0.8; toxicity (4). A colorless, combustible liquid derived from steam distillation of wood from pine (conifer) trees. Turpentine is miscible in oils, ether, and chloroform. Principal uses are as a drying agent or as a solvent for thinners of paints, lacquers, varnishes and used in wax-based polishes and liniments. It is also used to manufacture certain linoleums, soap, ink, artificial campour and rubber.

20. Xylenes - (dimethylbenzene) C6H4 (CH3)2; flash point 29 degrees F ( - 2 degrees C) ; ignition temperature 867 degrees F (464 degrees C); explosive limits - not reported (moderate fire risk) ; vapor density > 1; specific gravity 0.86; toxicity (4). A colorless, flammable liquid miscible in alcohol and ether, insoluble in water. Xylene is isolated from crude wood distillate or obtained from fractional distillation of petroleum or coal tar. Commercial xylene is a mixture of three isomers, o-, m-, and p-xylene, the m-isomer predominates. Xylenes, a common chemical, are used for conversion to polyester fibers and plasticizers in the plastic industry, in aviation gasoline, rubber cements, automotive enamels, paints and lacquers, and a variety of other commercial applications.

___________________________________________________________________

https://www.thermo.com/eThermo/CMA/PDFs/Product/productPDF_55778.PDF

Detection and Identiﬁcation of Accelerants in
Arson Studies by Fast Gas Chromatography
Audrey Pommier, Carine Donichak, Guillaume Cognon Fire and Arson Unit, Institut de Recherche Criminelle de la Gendarmerie
Nationale, Rosny sous bois, France
Bénédicte Gauriat-Desroy, Thermo Electron Corporation, Les Ulis, France

Overview
Purpose:
Examine the applicability of fast gas chromatography in
the detection and identiﬁcation of accelerants in arson
studies.
Methods:
Samples are incubated in an oven. A 150 µL static
headspace fraction is collected using a gas tight syringe
and injected into a 100% dimethyl polysiloxane
20m-0.1mm-0.1µm column. The analysis is performed in
split mode using a split ratio of 1:125.
Detection is performed with a ﬂame ionization
detector (FID) and ChromCard™ software. Remote data
acquisition and review occur via a computer network.
Results:
The accelerants are analyzed and detected in a fraction of
the time of typical analytical technique. Optimization
steps of the translation from conventional
chromatography to fast chromatography are also
presented.
_______________________________

EX

Spectacular arson fire destroys Pacific Trail Sportswear's factory and headquarters in Seattle on March 1, 1969.
HistoryLink.org Essay 1188 : Printer-Friendly Format

On March 1, 1969, an arson fire destroys the Pacific Trail Sportswear headquarters and factory on 8th Avenue N in Seattle's South Lake Union neighborhood. The blaze is first reported at 7:36 p.m., and up to 150 firefighters will struggle for almost two hours to bring it under control. At its peak, the fire shoots flames more than 100 feet into the air and burns through electrical lines, cutting power in the immediate area and temporarily knocking KING TV off the air. Several nearby businesses are also damaged. It is the largest arson fire in Seattle's history up to that time. The crime remains unsolved until December 1970, when a former Pacific Trail employee, Daryl B. Root, is charged with setting the fire. Root is later convicted and sentenced to up to 10 years in prison. There are only two minor injuries from the blaze, and no loss of life. Pacific Trail has additional manufacturing facilities in other cities and will recover from the loss and go on to prosper.

Referee

10th January 2013, 07:54

Here you go. A lot of Religion in this video but great example of what happened.

cY-AYOaJyhg

Tesla_WTC_Solution

10th January 2013, 08:06

Referee

10th January 2013, 08:13

Tesla_WTC_Solution

10th January 2013, 19:07

That is good if it is about HAARP, but you don't need something that big anymore for a job like this; it could be in a van, suitcase, plane, etc your basement even LOL

Did i forget to mention Dr. Judy Wood?

http://www.drjudywood.com/

The Journal of 9/11 Research
and
9/11 Issues
Yes, there are issues with 9/11!!!
"A time comes when silence is betrayal."
- Martin Luther King

I do not believe it was HAARP I believe it is spaced based weapon. However still a Tesla Tech Aray. The concrete was pulvirized to micron sized particals. We know thermite and or thermate was also present. Where they further accelerated?

Have you read about Project Misty and other black ops satellite projects?
This could have to do greatly with what you were saying.

I for one believe you on the satellite theory.
My cousin went to Antarctica and told me that he couldn't believe or factor the number of satellites he could see through the ozone hole down there... just in ONE orbit path too.
thousands upon thousands of clandestine launches.

:(

thank you for using the word "array" -- someone badmouthed me on ATS for calling the technology a "marconi array" :(

Tesla_WTC_Solution

12th January 2013, 18:30

MAGNETOELASTICITY AND MAGNETORESTRICTION OF IRON WHEN SUBJECTED TO ROTATIONAL MAGNETIC FIELD

Hello again everyone.
I am so pissed off that my blog was eaten by wordpress. It had more info than one person can remember on the above topics.

Giant magnetoelastic interaction in UFe2 | NuclearNuttery
nuclearnuttery.com/tag/giant-magnetoelastic-interaction-in-ufe2/Mar 9, 2012 – Posts about Giant magnetoelastic interaction in UFe2 written by ... of my “Helicon Waves” or “Helical Beams” I've been raving about this month?

etc.

______________________________________

https://aaltodoc.aalto.fi/bitstream/handle/123456789/2432/isbn9512271850.pdf?sequence=1

Helsinki University of Technology Department of Electrical and Communications
Engineering Laboratory of Electromechanics
Teknillinen korkeakoulu sähkö- ja tietoliikennetekniikan osasto sähkömekaniikan laboratorio
Espoo 2004 Report 72

Doctoral thesis
Anouar Belahcen

!

This thesis deals with the computation of magnetic
and magnetostrictive forces, as well as with the
magnetoelastic coupling in rotating electrical machines.

Magnetoelasticity means here the interaction between
the magnetic and elastic fields in the iron parts of a machine.

Magnetorestriction is the phenomenon by which an iron part
changes its dimensions under the effect of a magnetic field.

http://www.investigate911.info/911moltensteel.JPG

http://algoxy.com/psych/images2/moltensteelenclose5mt.jpg

http://www.sharpprintinginc.com/911/images/pagemaster/5.jpg

http://911research.wtc7.net/wtc/analysis/theories/docs/st_spout3s.jpg

http://www.monte-rio.info/storage/bohemian-grove-owl-logo-1966.jpg?__SQUARESPACE_CACHEVERSION=1311447188457

http://www.lovethetruth.com/false_religion/occult/cremation_of_care.jpg

http://www.calbuzz.com/wp-content/uploads/arson.jpg

History Freak Reports:

Great London Fire of 1666, Seattle Great Fire of the 1890s, and maybe even 9-11 were horrific acts of arson propagated by evil mayors and the men who put them into power.

London mayor in 1666 deceived the king as to the severity of the fire and did not provide an accurate accounting of the dead. Sam Pepys had to take over (historian hero).

The Seattle Mayor in the 1890s (Moran) set fire to Seattle the very day the fire chief had gone to San Fran for a firefighting convention there. Can you believe that? And he even blew up Colman block which made the fire rush uphill.

In regards to 9-11, I believe the 1000s of engis who say it could not have happened in the manner reported. the first responders mercilessly slain.We live in a world of smoke and mirrors.
Who can know for how many decades the wool has been pulled over the public eye by the so called elite.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

22nd January 2013, 15:20

I didn't talk about circularly polarized light very much.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Circular_polarization

In electrodynamics, circular polarization[1] of an electromagnetic wave is a polarization in which the electric field of the passing wave does not change strength but only changes direction in a rotary manner.

In electrodynamics the strength and direction of an electric field is defined by what is called an electric field vector. In the case of a circularly polarized wave, as seen in the accompanying animation, the tip of the electric field vector, at a given point in space, describes a circle as time progresses. If the wave is frozen in time, the electric field vector of the wave describes a helix along the direction of propagation.

Circular polarization is a limiting case of the more general condition of elliptical polarization. The other special case is the easier-to-understand linear polarization.

The phenomenon of polarization arises as a consequence of the fact that light behaves as a two-dimensional transverse wave.

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/81/Circular.Polarization.Circularly.Polarized.Light_Right.Handed.Animation.305x190.255Colors.gif

The Fresnel equations (or Fresnel conditions), deduced by Augustin-Jean Fresnel (pron.: /frɛˈnɛl/), describe the behaviour of light when moving between media of differing refractive indices. The reflection of light that the equations predict is known as Fresnel reflection.

A traveling-wave tube (TWT) is a specialised vacuum tube that is used in electronics to amplify radio frequency (RF) signals to high power, usually as part of an electronic assembly known as a traveling-wave tube amplifier (TWTA).

The bandwidth of a broadband TWT can be as high as one octave, although tuned (narrowband) versions exist, and operating frequencies range from 300 MHz to 50 GHz. The voltage gain of the tube is on the order of 70 decibels.

Helix TWTs are limited in peak RF power by the current handling (and therefore thickness) of the helix wire. As power level increases, the wire can overheat and cause the helix geometry to warp. Wire thickness can be increased to improve matters, but if the wire is too thick it becomes impossible to obtain the required helix pitch for proper operation. Typically helix TWTs achieve less than 2.5 kW output power.

The coupled-cavity TWT overcomes this limit by replacing the helix with a series of coupled cavities arranged axially along the beam. This structure provides a helical waveguide, and hence amplification can occur via velocity modulation. Helical waveguides have very nonlinear dispersion and thus are only narrowband (but wider than klystron). A coupled-cavity TWT can achieve 60 kW output power.

Operation is similar to that of a klystron, except that coupled-cavity TWTs are designed with attenuation between the slow-wave structure instead of a drift tube. The slow-wave structure gives the TWT its wide bandwidth. A free electron laser allows higher frequencies.

A free-electron laser, or FEL, is a laser that shares the same optical properties as conventional lasers such as emitting a beam consisting of coherent electromagnetic radiation which can reach high power, but which uses some very different operating principles to form the beam. Unlike gas, liquid, or solid-state lasers such as diode lasers, in which electrons are excited in bound atomic or molecular states, FELs use a relativistic electron beam as the lasing medium which moves freely through a magnetic structure, hence the term free electron.[1] The free-electron laser has the widest frequency range of any laser type, and can be widely tunable,[2] currently ranging in wavelength from microwaves, through terahertz radiation and infrared, to the visible spectrum, to ultraviolet, to X-rays.[3]

Schematic representation of an undulator, at the core of a free-electron laser.
Free-electron lasers were invented by John Madey in 1976 at Stanford University. The work emanates from research done by Hans Motz and his coworkers who built an undulator at Stanford in 1953 using the wiggler magnetic configuration which is at the heart of a free electron laser. Madey used a 24 MeV electron beam and 5 m long wiggler to amplify a signal. Soon afterward, other laboratories with accelerators started developing such lasers.

The European x-ray free electron laser (European XFEL) is an X-ray research laser project currently under construction and is as of 2012 slated to be operational by the end of 2015.[1] The international project with 12 participating countries is located in the German federal states of Hamburg and Schleswig-Holstein.[2] A free electron laser generates high-intensity electromagnetic radiation by accelerating electrons to relativistic speeds and directing them through special magnetic structures. The European XFEL is constructed such that the electrons produce x-ray light in synchronisation, resulting in high-intensity x-ray pulses with the properties of laser light and at intensities much brighter than those produced by conventional synchrotron light sources.

http://1.bp.blogspot.com/_1_72U10wyA4/SyIJD-fROXI/AAAAAAAABEU/Ox-BF73lZ6I/s400/norway+spiral+light+3.jpeg

experiment using massive plasma waveguide?

Tesla_WTC_Solution

23rd January 2013, 21:14

I just want to re-affirm that the reason my former personal website was taken down had something to do with the above material.

Not once but twice, my article on tesla physics caused the demise of my blog. Once the article itself was removed (draft), then the entire website.

I suffered a loss of my original material when the Fred Bell/Jesse Ventura show came out. I didn't sue them. Bell ended up Dead!!!

Then wordpress deleted my blog then ultimately erased my account; i can't even log into the dash now. sigh. i logged into the ftp stuff or w/e and didn't see any folders.

HMMMMM.

something is rotten in the state of USA lol

edit: the death of fred bell

http://2012thebigpicture.wordpress.com/2012/11/17/dr-fred-bells-mysterious-death-after-meeting-with-jesse-ventura/

NOVEMBER 17, 2012
Dr. Fred Bell’s Mysterious Death After Meeting with Jesse Ventura

Dr. Bell died mysteriously on September 25th, 2011 of “natural causes” according to the coroner–just as whistleblowers say the other Death Ray victims supposedly did. Coincidence? Is this is your shadow government at work, folks? They are ruthless and will stop at nothing to keep their secrets and make a point…

Below is one of the most impressive biographies I’ve ever read.

Dr. Fred Bell was an extraordinary man who can possibly add his name to the list of people who sacrificed their life to bring truth and freedom to others.

Here is a short interview with Jesse Ventura about Dr. Bell’s death on Coast to Coast AM.

If you read the comments below the video at YouTube, you’ll see that Dr. Fred Bell is brother to Art Bell, considered founder and original host of Coast to Coast AM. Interesting connection…

Dr. Fred Bell was born in Ann Arbor Michigan. His father was a scientist who worked with the late Henry Ford Sr. His great uncle from his father’s side, Alexander Graham Bell, was also a very well-known inventor, and on his mother’s side, a direct descendant of Ethan Allen. As a result of this strange genetic gene pool Dr. Bell has a tendency to be a revolutionist with wild and crazy ideas…a bit of an eclectic eccentric. His father Allan Bell, brought the London Bridge over from England and put it in the middle of an Arizona desert. Later he built a city with a pond around it, today called Havasu City.

Because of his strange heritage young Dr. Fred Bell was propelled into science at a very early age. At age 14, he was not only working at the University of Michigan on nuclear energy projects, but was also inducted into the U.S. government’s project called M. K. Ultra. This early mind control research covered such topics as past life regression, and the popular remote viewing used today by the CIA and other intelligence gathering factions worldwide. While working University of Michigan Dr. Bell had the privilege of working under the mentorship of Dr. Katz. Dr. Katz came over here, as an honored scientist, previously working for the 3rd Reich under Adolph Hitler. Wernher von Braun and Dr. Katz both were transferred here by the American government under an operation known as Operation Paperclip.

While working for Dr. Katz in the Randolph Laboratory at the University of Michigan, Dr. Bell worked on a magnetic disintegration project later known as the Philadelphia Experiment, a high temperature fusion experiment, a bubble project later known as Cold Fusion, shock wave experimentation that led to the classification of high altitude nuclear blasts, underground nuclear blasts, nuclear explosions over water and nuclear explosions at ground level. In addition, Dr. Bell worked with the University of Michigan’s Cyclotron doing experimentation with the bombardment of nuclear particles and their collisions involving reverse time as observed in a Wilson Cloud Chamber. As a result of this, Dr. Bell built the World’s first time machine called the T-1 Time Travel Transposer that allows time travel into the future in increments of microseconds.

At 16 years of age he was interned at the United States Army Biological Weapons Division in Little Rock, Arkansas. On his 17th birthday, he was transferred into the United States Air Force. There he began working on highly classified projects, several involving early warning radar defense systems and the detection and tracking of extraterrestrial craft. He was one of the first to bring the awareness of the famed DDS Form 332 to public awareness. The DDS Form 332 was used by the military to report to the higher command of any unidentified aircraft activities. Once this report was processed in a strategic air command center (SAC), a computerized profile was run on the sighting and then a determination was made as to whether to scramble fighter aircraft for International Defence. While stationed at the 776 Radar Squadron at Point Arena, California, Dr. Bell filed the official complaint of a international government cover-up to the general public of extraterrestrial activity over American skies.

Later on in the United States of America, when people began to exercise their freedoms to previously classified information, it was discovered that the DDS Form 332 was used in fact by the U.S. Air Force to report internally to the government of the presence of extraterrestrials and their craft. Today Dr. Bell still works with the government when the need arises. Just prior to the catastrophe of 9/11, Dr. Bell was working with famed Dr. Steven Greer in de-compartmentalizing the various agencies that are working in concert with extraterrestrials, on such projects as advanced propulsion systems and star wars weaponry. This project was known as the Disclosure Project and was being presented to the United States Senate on the very day of 9/11.

After his tenure in the military, he worked in the private sector with North American Aviation, Autonetic and Rocketdyne, on projects such as Star Wars (the military version), laser development, Saturn Rocket second stage development, the Eyeglass Project (a subdivision of Star Wars), submarine and missile guidance systems, and finally the lunar lander project known as the Apollo missions. During this time he worked with Scott Crosfield, of the X. 15 fame and the late Wernher von Braun. Dr. Bell had the privilege of working inside of all the Apollo modules – during the late night shift Dr. Bell used to push all the buttons and play astronaut!

After he left his NASA related position, he went into the private sector and consulted to over 3000 companies on topics such as computer science, biological science, medical science, environmental testing, quality control, weaponry, aircraft research, advanced propulsion technologies, and a variety of other technical realities. Because of his vast background in instrumentation, his services were applicable almost anywhere worldwide.

He then left the defense sector and began studying with Himalayan Masters. During this time he became internationally known as a contactee to a Pleiadean group of extraterrestrial humanoids whom were here to help the people on earth save themselves from their own destructive tendencies. This group comes from a star system 500 light-years from earth. For this effort the Russian society of cosmonauts (astronauts), awarded Dr. Bell the distinguished scientific progress award.

Today Dr. Bell is a practicing naturopath, scientist and environmentalist, and political activist, and has been currently working worldwide with programs that include a proper conduct of school systems, autistic children, and other problems that develop and effect the growth factor of our young up-and-coming society. He spent 20 years with a National Health Federation, a U.S. based group that has promoted an individuals freedom, to choose the type of health-care, freedom to choose the various vitamins and minerals and dietary elements that best works for them. In addition, he has brought attention to various forms of world attrition, which have caused the formation of many oceanic and rain forest projects.

_______________________

is the above true!?

Tesla_WTC_Solution

1st March 2013, 23:19

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=237490

On Richplanet

http://www.richplanet.net/starship.php

In 2012, former professor of engineering mechanics Dr Judy Wood came to the UK to present a lecture tour. The conclusions of her research prove that even those who support supposed 9/11 truth groups, such as Architects and Engineers for 9/11 Truth have got their facts wrong. The towers did not slam to the ground, but turned into dust in mid air. Dr Wood clearly demonstrates this in her two part lecture. None of the conventional explanations about 9/11 remotely fit the evidence. An undisclosed form of weapon was used to turn two of the worlds strongest buildings into dust. Those who support the thermite theory need to realise they were lied to twice, because the thermite argument is also a big lie, put out initially by Stephen E. Jones, the same Stephen E. Jones who was used to cover up cold fusion technology in 1989.

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/

http://wheredidthetowersgo.com/wp-content/uploads/2010/12/header.gif

If you are among those who have called for a new, open, and independent investigation, today’s your lucky day! This is not only “The New Investigation,” it is the only comprehensive-forensic investigation to date in the public domain. As of this publication only one person —myself, Dr. Judy Wood— has conducted a comprehensive investigation to determine what happened to the World Trade Center (WTC) complex. This was part of the federal qui tam (whistleblower) case I filed (2007) in which I accused the defendants of science fraud.

This book is a summary of the physical evidence submitted in my federal qui tam case accusing the defendants of science fraud. NIST was mandated by congress to “Determine why and how WTC 1 and WTC 2 collapsed…” yet NIST admitted to me that they did not analyze the “collapse.” The contractors they hired with taxpayer money knowingly allowed the fraudulent report to become final.

Sadly, this case had no support from the “Truth movement,” leaving the judges free to ignore the law in order to dismiss the case (which they acknowledged they did) so they could sweep it under the carpet. Had this case been allowed to move forward, the defendants (whose expertise is energy weapons) would have been put under oath (equivalent to subpoena power).

Tesla_WTC_Solution

19th June 2013, 22:36

http://www.cnn.com/2013/06/19/justice/new-york-terror-charges/index.html?hpt=hp_t2

Two charged in bizarre X-ray terror plot
From Susan Candiotti and Allison Malloy, CNN
updated 2:51 PM EDT, Wed June 19, 2013

New York (CNN) -- Two men have been charged in the Albany, New York, area in a bizarre plan to use a device loosely described as a ray gun to "target people they didn't like," a federal law enforcement source with knowledge of the investigation said Wednesday. [Who didn't they like?]

Glendon Scott Crawford, 49, and Eric J. Feight, 54, were arrested Tuesday after an undercover operation by the Albany FBI Joint Terrorism Task Force. They were charged with conspiracy to provide material support to terrorists. [Define "terror"]

The suspects intended to use the device to harm and kill enemies of Israel, a Department of Justice news release said. If convicted, each faces up to 15 years in prison, a $250,000 fine and five years of supervised release. [Who recruited them?]

The suspects, expected to appear in federal court Wednesday, apparently planned to use the homemade X-ray machine to attack high-ranking government officials and other targets with radiation, the source said. [O Really? Targets like the WTC?]

They do not appear to belong to any terror group or subscribe to any particular ideology, the source said. [But I thot dey was Jewish sympathizers?]

The public was never in any danger, the source said. The device created by the defendants was deemed inoperable and not a threat to the public. [LOL we smashed UR device and learned a lot about it!]

Beginning in April 2012, authorities received information that Crawford was searching for people at local Jewish organizations to help him build a device capable of killing human targets silently from a distance, according to a criminal complaint. [TV already does that but it's not silent enough yet]

:suspicious::suspicious::suspicious:
:spy::spy::spy:

Tesla_WTC_Solution

10th September 2013, 03:26

I don't usually bump my own threads, but on the eve of 9/11 annie we should take a moment of silence to contemplate the idea that WTC was leveled by exotic energy weapons, not explosives or fire.

toad

10th September 2013, 14:12

explosives, fire & gravity

Tesla_WTC_Solution

11th September 2013, 21:16

explosives, fire & gravity

Toad, my friend, this thread is about new ideas, not worn out lies.

toad

11th September 2013, 22:49

explosives, fire & gravity

Toad, my friend, this thread is about new ideas, not worn out lies.

Gravity is a lie? You think gravity had nothing at all do to with the WTC towers coming down?? :(

Tesla_WTC_Solution

12th September 2013, 07:24

explosives, fire & gravity

Toad, my friend, this thread is about new ideas, not worn out lies.

Gravity is a lie? You think gravity had nothing at all do to with the WTC towers coming down?? :(

In the past it was stalkers and spooks who put the one-liners in my threads, thinking themselves wise enough to sum it all up in four words -- and shortly after this happened, my account would be compromised.

I wonder, did you even read this thread, or did you crawl out of the frog pond just long enough to discourage anyone with a creative point of view?

And might I add, do you not realize that it is possible to be wrong and still have made a good point about something?
It's kind of weird that paranoid thought police want the rest of us to think about as little as possible.

I am not sure what you mean by gravity, you mean how fast the **** hit the ground, or what? You want me to calculate the speed at which the debris hit the ground, or you want me to say something else? When people are as vague and unhelpful as this, it's kind of hard to help, and I am not one to try to force my views on others -- I simply invite you to review the material, address it in its completeness, and then ask simple questions.

When the answer is in front of your face and you still act like you are stumbling in the dark, someone is going to point it out that you are blind.

toad

12th September 2013, 16:52

I skimmed threw the thread, I've read a majority of this information before, and believe me I've had intense discussions about hutchinsons effects, and the infamous judy wood, what I was adding was something simple, the fact that you forgot one of the universes most mysterious forces, and it was because of gravity that everything came down, deny that and I'll shake my head and carry on carrying on. Cheers!

I'll take the spook comment as a compliment, haha.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

12th September 2013, 16:56

I am sorry, but I don't see the need or the reason to re-introduce the original claims of the "official 9/11 story" in my thread that clearly covers another theory.

I won't even continue to address this.

It's an idea, not a religion, take it or leave it

toad

12th September 2013, 17:30

I'm confused, do you honestly believe gravity had no effect at all? Is this sarcasm or sincerity?.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

12th September 2013, 17:45

I'm confused, do you honestly believe gravity had no effect at all? Is this sarcasm or sincerity?.Nowhere have you as addressed or tried to disprove the theory in this thread. You keep asking the same question over and over again. Of course I believe in gravity.

But gravity can't explain the manner in which those buildings fell or the manner in which the metal girders were heated.
It doesn't explain radiation or what happened in B7.

I feel very strongly that you have no other purpose than trying to derail this thread and I've been forced to report your posts as well, not because I don't like discussion, but because this is NOT a discussion.

Please, GET OUT.

ThePythonicCow

12th September 2013, 23:13

I'm confused, do you honestly believe gravity had no effect at all? Is this sarcasm or sincerity?.

This thread is about a different perspective on what were the dominant physics of that day, 9/11, in the collapse of the WTC buildings.

You've made your point here. If you wish to continue to expound on a substantial role for gravity in the collapse, please take it to another thread.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

13th September 2013, 02:26

Sorry about this.

I should be more polite.

It's just really hard!
Plus every post I have to make risks being eaten by my bad connection.

Referee

13th September 2013, 03:49

TTA's are everywhere now in the ocean on spaced based weapons On mountain tops planes all over.

Rev Michelle Hopkins YT is a good source for this material. @ Tesla WTC.... You know your striking a nerve when they come bother you.........

By the way TTA's were used in 9/11 IMHO

Bob

13th September 2013, 05:39

Tesla_WTC_Solution says: Hello again everyone.
I am so pissed off that my blog was eaten

Howdy Tesla_WTC_Solution - glad to see that you are so wonderfully cognizant and technically minded to read between the lines and connect the dots.

People talk about Haarp transmitters or even satellites, with Haarp at least two systems are required to be operating to setup a directable field dipole in the ionosphere layers - usually 3000 miles apart is the minimum. Ionic heaters. Haarp needs two transmitter locations running at the same time to be dastardly, that is the key to see if a weapons use is being performed.

Hutch you started the thread with I really wouldn't use as the example of melting metal, but I get the point, a not normal effect is happening.

I will say this. Since 1972 the US government, department of Defence has had steering technology at least in principle when they stole various patents from inventors who in all good heart filed with only the best intent to help mankind. There were three key players involved back then. Two gained extreme notoriety in latter politics, and one was booted out in disgrace.

Technically to spill the beans, it takes 3 minimum of a certain type of transmitter to dial up direct and have a manifestation, either using sky wave, ground wave or through the earth wave and have an outcome similar to what would appear to be a plasma flame torch at a set location. No apparent source for such will be evident - in fact the transmitters (remember 3 is the desired number) can be located pretty much anywhere there is a large source of POWER. When the transmitters operate one can expect to see a few megawatts of AC draining out of the grid. This is no Bearden woo woo Tesla conjectures he made to impress. Anybody want to comment on how much juice some dedicated nuclear reactors the size that operate .. think maybe 40 megawatts is a nice good round about number to operate the transmitters on.

The key with Tesla was that he said one could send a signal through the earth, or later use a sky wave to transmit power - and no doubt why you were slapped with blog removal. Many people jumped on that and got really scared. Tesla never did have the full power needed to do a full earth resonance, but he could play with skywave and ground wave very well. He never developed steering though so he wasted power.

These things that ARE being used by TPTB are INFERNAL MACHINES. Thing is smaller versions able to do very dastardly things can be made with off-the-shelf equipment and it would not be traceable where the plasma wave came from.. And at a distance the effect would appear. One would not need the 40 megawatts unless one is trying to remove Beijing from the face of the earth and blame Singapore.. 10 KW per transmitter is very formidable if directed with what i point out as far as the steering mechanism.

The coils of the big transmitters, do look a LOT like a Tesla primary, so I can see why you felt it would appear to be a "TESLA" device. Very good RV and intuit there. :)

You mention vehicle mounted system. What works is proven and used - without any vehicle anywhere - is a fixed system totally innocuous looks like something very normal. Remember the number 3 for the transmitters.. Nobody see's it coming, it just happens.

Same type of stuff could take out submarines too, or blast through a GULF of Mexico deep drill stem pipe, ripping it apart with a rather nasty oscillation till it fractured.

I see the GLEE in the eyes of Mr. Hadon in Contact when Jodi Foster sees his eyes when he says "wanna play?" Big bucks behind that stuff.

I see you found some data on the "owlies" up in northern California. I have been asked by one of them to visit and party with them - wonder what that is all about... :rolleyes:

keep up the good work.

Bob

PS - I was just asked, "Is there a counter-measure to this type of system?" Sadly no. It's like asking is there a counter-measure for a Mac Truck (or lorry) barreling down on ya.. GET OUT of the WAY is what the solution is.

TO identify the locations of these things IS possible, monitoring for certain signatures on the power grid mains is possible, however I suspect the bigger systems have in-fact switched over to nuclear. The power grid systems do use a stored capacitor bank to "load level" when they do a discharge into the transmitters. I don't know if a power grid monitoring would show up in that case.

However, there is a rather strong gravity wave PULSE which happens that can be picked up and it can be tracked back to a transmitter location, I don't know of any such monitors currently being operated to monitor for these Infernal Machines. I would think something like that should be done if anyone wants to know.

ThePythonicCow

13th September 2013, 09:31

By the way TTA's were used in 9/11 IMHO
I don't know that for a fact ... but I'd wager you're right ... that Tesla Technology Arrays (TTA's) were used in 9/11 ... as revmichellehopkins documents in this Youtube video http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cY-AYOaJyhg

Tesla_WTC_Solution

13th September 2013, 16:22

Thanks to you both! Bobd, that is very interesting -- and many people don't realize, possible!!! Ty Paul for the link!

It sounds completely possible that it was HAARP. I think lots of us on Prisonplanet wondered this, and we found out some scary things.
However we got laughed at by lots of the other people, although PP actually has its own HAARP forum.

In fact I even bought the book "Angels Don't Play This HAARP" in order to see what other concerned people thought.
Apparently lots of military men and scientists were annoyed with HAARP and some even thought it was a WMD.

Gizmag says it's totally directional:

HAARP was established in 1993 by the US Air Force, the US Navy, DARPA, and the University of Alaska. Located outside of Gakona, Alaska, the facility houses a high frequency (HF) transmitter together with a phased-array antenna to focus and direct the radiated RF power. The transmitter is roughly as powerful as the largest military radars, generating up to 3.6 MW of RF power in the 2.8 to 10 MHz band. HAARP is restricted to operations only at specified frequencies in this band.
They *say* other bands are restricted, but... what about ELF?

http://www.earthpulse.com/src/subcategory.asp?catid=1&subcatid=4

Biohazards of Extremely Low Frequencies (ELF)

by Dr. Nick Begich

Reprinted from Earthpulse Flashpoints Series 1 Volume 1.

In reporting on the HAARP project the issue of extremely low frequency (ELF) impacts on human health has been raised. The debate on the impact of ELF is still ongoing in international medical circles. However, recent research points to the fact that these frequencies when shaped and transferred to humans cause significant reactions. In our book, Angels Don't Play this HAARP: Advances in Tesla Technology, we explore some of these reactions.

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp4.jpg

http://www.theforbiddenknowledge.com/hardtruth/haarp_mind_weather_control.htm

High Frequency Active Auroral Research Program, HAARP (1993)

The HAARP Program is jointly managed by the US Air Force and the US Navy, and is based in Gakona, Alaska. It is designed to "understand, simulate and control ionospheric processes that might alter the performance of communication and surveillance systems." The HAARP system intends to beam 3.6 Gigawatts of effective radiated power of high frequency radio energy into the ionosphere in order to:

Generate extremely low frequency (ELF) waves for communicating with submerged submarines
Conduct geophysical probes to identify and characterize natural ionospheric processes so that techniques can be developed to mitigate or control them
Generate ionospheric lenses to focus large amounts of high frequency energy, thus providing a means of triggering ionospheric processes that potentially could be exploited for Department of Defense purposes,

Electron acceleration for infrared (IR) and other optical emissions which could be used to control radio wave propagation properties
Generate geomagnetic field aligned ionization to control the reflection/scattering properties of radio waves,
Use oblique heating to produce effects on radio wave propagation, thus broadening the potential military applications of ionospheric enhancement technology.

Conclusions

It would be rash to assume that HAARP is an isolated experiment which would not be expanded. It is related to fifty years of intensive and increasingly destructive programs to understand and control the upper atmosphere.

It would be rash not to associate HAARP with the space laboratory construction which is separately being planned by the United States. HAARP is an integral part of a long history of space research and development of a deliberate military nature.

The military implications of combining these projects is alarming.

Basic to this project is control of communications, both disruption and reliability in hostile environments. The power wielded by such control is obvious.

The ability of the HAARP / Spacelab/ rocket combination to deliver very large amount of energy, comparable to a nuclear bomb, anywhere on earth via laser and particle beams, are frightening.

The project is likely to be "sold" to the public as a space shield against incoming weapons, or, for the more gullible, a devise for repairing the ozone layer.

The military says the HAARP system could:

give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the military through at least 1986).
replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology.
Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and accurate system.
provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working.
provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements.
be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area.
be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.

HAARP is a useful espionage tool, i.e. finding other countries' oil and gas reserves and knowing which places to send our forces.

They didn't have a big enough antenna to carry their destructive signals either, so they piggybacked it on the Van Allen belts to be sure, lol!

http://www.physics.otago.ac.nz/space/RBR_cartoon1.jpg

http://crashrecovery.org/haarp/haarp-s.jpg

http://www.bariumblues.com/images/haarp1.gif

i have to run for now!!!!!

Tesla_WTC_Solution

13th September 2013, 16:39

p.s. some people talked about a portable tesla weapon

since everyone watches haarp like a hawk

Spike

13th September 2013, 16:46

Here you go. A lot of Religion in this video but great example of what happened.

cY-AYOaJyhg

wow all this time i thought it was thermite great video

Bob

13th September 2013, 18:20

Bob

13th September 2013, 19:04

Thanks to you both! Bobd, that is very interesting -- and many people don't realize, possible!!! Ty Paul for the link!

The military says the HAARP system could:

give the military a tool to replace the electromagnetic pulse effect of atmospheric thermonuclear devices (still considered a viable option by the military through at least 1986).
replace the huge Extremely Low Frequency (ELF) submarine communication system operating in Michigan and Wisconsin with a new and more compact technology.
Be used to replace the over-the-horizon radar system that was once planned for the current location of HAARP, with a more flexible and accurate system.
provide a way to wipe out communications over an extremely large area, while keeping the military's own communications systems working.
provide a wide area earth-penetrating tomography which, if combined with the computing abilities of EMASS and Cray computers, would make it possible to verify many parts of nuclear nonproliferation and peace agreements.
be a tool for geophysical probing to find oil, gas and mineral deposits over a large area.
be used to detect incoming low-level planes and cruise missiles, making other technologies obsolete.

HAARP is a useful espionage tool, i.e. finding other countries' oil and gas reserves and knowing which places to send our forces.

They didn't have a big enough antenna to carry their destructive signals either, so they piggybacked it on the Van Allen belts to be sure, lol!
!

Hia - some data on using remote excitation to look for oil and gas or minerals.

The techniques for surveying using eletromagnetics are called CSEM, CSAMT, and or Magneto-Telluric monitoring. A charge source generally in the audio ranges, from about 0.01 hertz through 100 hertz is directed electrically through two electrodes at about 1-2 miles from where the survey team places pickup electrodes and magnetic pickups. The transmitter skin depth penetrates according to the excitation frequencies, and the receivers pick up a relative "resistance" according to frequency and the mineralogy present. It is assumed that oil will have a different resistance as will water (salt water or fresh), and minerals will have a different resistance. The science to do this reliably is at level 0.001, not even close to being BETA level in practice.

I cite CSEM and CSAMT and AMT and Magneto tellurics because I use these technologies all the time in many projects to do underground surveying. I am highly qualified in their use and limitations, and I know what penetrates into the earth and what does not - what is a ground wave, and sky wave and surface wave. I say I find the disinformation being reported and repeated as "fact" all over the place being particularly annoying. Anyone trying to get research by doing book research first is lead down the tubes, and they end up spinning their wheels for years if they are so inclined to actually accomplish something useful.

I had this discussion with another forum poster who was warning me not to try to find out (and post evidence on Dulce).. So I am supposed to allow the rumors, disinformation and gossip to spread and create a useful controllable "culture"? I think not. Bogus is bogus and if I come across it I will say something. I think others should do their research and be accurate and cognizant on their subjects, not repeat hearsay.

To say HAARP can do this, it is impossible to excite and achieve the penetration wavelengths of any depth, such as 0.01 hertz is needed as far as a wavelength to penetrate down to the depths of a few kilometers where oil deposits are found. The article citing that Haarp can be used is bogus.

Passive Magneto Tellurics uses the constant lightning strikes from around the planet that contain broad band frequencies from about 0.001 hertz through a couple megahertz (sonic shockwaves inducing electromagnetic fields in other words like earthquakes excitation are the lowest frequencies that allow for deep penetration and deep searches). Sensors both electric and magnetic at given distances apart are placed in the survey area. The frequencies received from the sensors are observed over time, with an understanding that the lowest frequencies have the deepest penetration, therefore the deepest depth ranges only are perceivable with the lowest frequencies.

HAARP is on the order of many thousands of a cycle per second with no deep penetration frequencies. HAARP doesn't penetrate the earth due to the higher frequencies being used.

However - Trying to make HAARP contain lower modulation frequencies than the excitation carrier wave is disturbing, using the ionosphere generate by mixing lower frequencies is potentially disastrous as such disrupts the normal frequency distribution that life has grown up with and evolved over the planet. That's where some of the dangers happen from.. Weather manipulation by created charge anomalies moving the jet streams.. and the modulation effects creating sub-harmonics..

If you would like some technical assistance on these concepts, what is bogus hearsay and what really works, please let me know. If some good can come out of it, I am interested.

Bob

PS - Tesla_WTC_ I truly appreciate what you are posting, and in no way am I alluding to you posting hearsay. I am just saying some data needs to be looked at critically with an eye towards the real truth, to sort what is a stretch, to sort where the sleight of hand is happening.. I appreciate YOU ! tnx.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

13th September 2013, 19:46

Bob

13th September 2013, 21:01

I believe you! That stuff is fairly technical.

However at the same time, you remember a quote of Carl Jung, something like, "the most significant advances in science tend to be accidental -- the ones that cause you to say not 'I was right', but 'that is odd'."

I would not be surprised to find that nearly anything is possible.
One of the virtues of modern science is in fact miniaturization and multi-purpose functionality.

I never look at a thing and think, "the purpose of this thing is clear".
I try to find out what else is hiding inside what seems to be a simple pattern.

Our government has a long history of saying one thing and doing another, and this extends to the descriptions in patents and the disclosures and disclaimers on websites and reports.

I am not sure if you have seen Stargate, but it had a lot of social commentary about how our Air Force and other agencies often hide things in plain sight, using labels that evoke little scrutiny while participating in activities that would otherwise tear apart our society.

Funny that Jung a psychologist, would get into science, but possibly he was pointing out human consciousness surprises even him now and then.. weee collective unconsciousness and collective conscious - great spot to test all that on a Forum :)

I keep up on tings that Richard Dean Anderson got into between MacGyver and of course Stargate. Watching the different psychodramas present themselves and the solutions being presented for people to "live" as audience. SO of course we see people all the sudden now channeling "Stargates" weoh another bunch of stories come out of that. How about warp drive, with Roddenberry and transporter tech cause no good method of explaining how to land a craft on a planet (the known way) on "set" was economically possible. But it did get people thinking how could that be done (see Science of Star Trek for instance, on tech advances made possible because people believed in the fantasies they saw on the tube..) Silver linings..

Social engineering isn't it? How to deal with people globally and locally.

I wonder if we should at some time start a thread dealing with the types of communications that are talked about in different Countries, the different social cultures. Pretty rapidly one can see what the circuits are that are being pushed button controlled by the news media, social media, and gossip.. I found the probing by the cabbies in UK to be most revealing, and in Israel, we could have a field day talking about what goes on there, right?

9-11 as Oklahoma city bombing, lets see, the major airlines which went down over the world, mysteriously, Haarp, "food dyes" (haven't heard that one again, but with Twinkies making a comeback who knows).. Vaccines thats quite a big one, cellphone radiation in the head, everyone forgot about blipverts and subliminal programming in media (visual), but there was a bit of backward speech (quite funny really), and of course channeling - weoh, the modern seances..

The reality is, there is programming, and people who know how to ask the right questions to push the right buttons, to make people seem like ranting fools if desired, or brilliant walkins being the new saviors to humanity.

Some very unkind folks point out, ITS ON YOUR SHOULDERS HUMANITY to solve it, and that is just plain stupid and ignorant and button pushing, starting with a challenge that the good have been killed off leaving the stupid to sort it. Really odd comments like that appear, but the point I believe I was seeing is CONTROL is what is happening, by whom to whom and for what purpose.

I hear slave planet earth. If one is affluent I bet one won't be saying slave planet earth. I know a bunch of Owlies who really are the trillionaires. Interesting folks. They talk about global guidance who is gonna be the new focus to put mankinds attention on, "do you wanna do it this year? How about you?". I tend to wonder about all that now and then. Kindness or simply boredome by these folks.

They say, with no drama to occupy the masses, they will get into all sorts of sordid things. I think that is a low view of humanity, and it says crap about the educational system. Like how come females are kept from being allowed higher education in a lot of Countries? How come?

I choose to get to the source of it all and find out for myself. That's my only point, not repeating other's sayings, or quips.. If folks want knowledge they should have it accurate and true. If folks are going to be ethical on consequences for having knowledge and using it, that I don't know. We will see.

toad

13th September 2013, 23:47

Sorry about this.

I should be more polite.

It's just really hard!
Plus every post I have to make risks being eaten by my bad connection.

Please don't apologize, I was just confused and being complicated, sometimes I may come off as a dick and pretentious but I assure its not by design. carry on.

Bob

14th September 2013, 01:03

I'm confused, do you honestly believe gravity had no effect at all? Is this sarcasm or sincerity?.
Default Re: Closer Look at Hutchison Effect, Exotic Accelerants, Tesla Technology as Relates to 9/11
I'm confused, do you honestly believe gravity had no effect at all? Is this sarcasm or sincerity?.

Hia Toad -

I haven't fully followed your comment about Gravity - in the light of the technology being discussed is pretty intense stuff. Tesla/Paul and others have pointed out some amazing things are happening out there, and folks are looking at trying to figure figure how can such action at a distance happen.

Gravity definitely plays a part, but not planetary gravity short of that helping to bring down buildings and things after the fact... A tuned gravity wave beam obviously is what Hutch was trying to do in his illustrations. I won't get into Hutch's techniques or methods as he and others have not been able to reliably duplicate what he has shown on his videos.

The oddities tho being reported have a thread of repeatability, and high directivity.

Technically, if one is able to create a strong enough effect, which only focuses on one area with extreme precision at a distance, it obviously is somehow duplicating a lot of mass and/or energy equivalent of that mass.

A gravity wave does happen when two scalar waves interact in some "thing". If they are positively constructive there appears to be an increase in virtual mass and gravity - if they are negatively destructive, there appears to be a decrease in virtual mass and gravity. How that effect gets presented going THRU something like earth, or a solid building is not talked about. A gravity wave/scalar wave would penetrate, and there are various techniques to create such at a distance. That is what I was sharing with the Forum and Tesla_WTC_..

Gravity doesn't explain how the buildings were brought down, but in my paragraph above you can see I mention it appears as a byproduct of the assaulting energy system. I tend to agree with Tesla_WTC - there is a strong suggestion that a technology which in my experience was started with Nichola Tesla with wireless transmission of energy. What I bring up is a particular STEERING technology able to deal with conveying in JUST the desired location of the energy (insidiously) is not only practical but has been tested many times, in dastardly ways.

Does the Forum recall the unusual FIREBALLS over the Atlantic, that were not from meteors?

Anyway, that's some of the technical.

Bob

some unusual EMP like phenomenon links - events that happened without an apparent source of the energy, but the discharge noted:

http://nuclearweaponarchive.org/Safrica/Vela.html

There are more links but you get the idea.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

14th September 2013, 01:57

Bobd, on a hunch after the 3/11/11 quake in Japan, I looked at GOCE's satellite feed regarding the relative gravity readings during the week of the quake.
Japan seemed to be toward one end of the spectrum and the surrounding area, the opposite. Of course, I don't know about gravity on that scale, i.e. a whole country's worth, but it struck me as odd, or some might say, "anomalous".

The helical beam theory (for warping iron) is interesting because of changes in the magnetoelasticity of iron. As we know from childhood toys and science experiments in gradeschool, iron can do some odd things when subjected to normal magnetic fields. Exotic magnetic fields are something entirely new to our way of thinking, and I have no idea what is possible given the proper conditions.

p.s. i had a different post earlier but the connection destroyed it!
on an unstable network atm @@

¤=[Post Update]=¤

Sorry about this.

I should be more polite.

It's just really hard!
Plus every post I have to make risks being eaten by my bad connection.

Please don't apologize, I was just confused and being complicated, sometimes I may come off as a dick and pretentious but I assure its not by design. carry on.

I am sorry that my presentation of this topic was not more professional. As a layman it's very hard to convey these things without pictures, or a video, which we sadly don't have access to!

:(

sorry i got so upset. my patience ran out when my credit did

XD

http://jamesfetzer.blogspot.com/2010/04/blog-post.html

THURSDAY, APRIL 8, 2010

aka "Curtis": Were Tesla-style Weapons Used on the Twin Towers?

A guest who has now appeared on "The Real Deal" thrice to discuss Nikola Tesla and some of his remarkable inventions and uses the name "Curtis" has sketched how he believes the Twin Towers may have been taken out. His suggestion is that a Tesla-style vibrating device may have been used to bring about the demolecularization of the concrete and the steel. We are talking about very high frequencies of vibration, which were discussed on the program on Monday, 8 February 2010, Friday, 19 March 2010, and then again on Friday 26 March 2010. This possibility, I believe, has to be taken seriously, since there is no reasonable prospect, in my mind, that any combination of conventional explosives--with or without thermite in one of its various guises--could have brought about the complete and total transformation of two 500,000-ton buildings into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust. To see what has to be explained, turn to my earlier blog, "New 9/11 Photos Released", and you will begin to appreciate the dimensions of the problem.

Nikola Tesla and 9/11 - aka Curtis interviewed on "The Real Deal" with Jim Fetzer (8 February 2010)

http://www.hiddenmysteries.org/news/america/usa/091901f.html

They Seemed to Implode
Tesla Technology?

The WTC could have been deliberately reduced to rubble for maximum visual impact on the 'World Stage.' and for major casualties to propel Americans into a war, they would otherwise never have accepted. If the twin towers had not collpsed, the buildings could have been evacuated and death and injury minimised. They seemed to implode.

Steven Evans a BBC correspondant who escaped from the WTC said live on air at the scene, "there was a much bigger explosion down below, I don't know what caused that!"

A rescue services employee told how he heard a huge "BOOM" just before the structure collapsed and disintegrated into dust. The potential to destroy buildings like this, has been in existence for over 80 years.

Nicola Tesla always maintained that he spoke to aliens and that his great contribution of the AC electric motor was the result of a sudden visual inspiration. For this pronouncement he was reviled by his scientific colleagues, in spite of this he was credited with the discovery of the electromagnetic propagation effect.

Tesla grappled with his lifelong objective of transmitting free electrical energy to all by pumping vast electrical potentials into the ground in one location to have in extracted on the other side of the globe.

He is supposed to have invented potentially terrible weapons, as part of his somewhat modernistic view of preserving peace. He invented the useful 'Tesla Coil', a circuitry which is designed to multiply it's frequency to achieve very large potentials.

He also invented a mechanical oscillator which he claimed could bring down tall structures, such as skyscrapers, with ease. He dabbled with so called 'death-rays' and an effect known as 'scalar vectoring,' which could destroy structures at a great distance-in the early to mid-1920's such devices were topical subjects for discussion.

Tesla had proven that a 'diabolical ray' could stop the electrical systems of cars, and gunpowder had been ignited at a distance of about 36 feet. Tesla continued to develop his idea of transmitting electrical energy worldwide using very low frequencies and maintained that his transmitter would produce one hundred million volts and up to a thousand amps-which equates to around a hundred billion watts!

He considered it would resonate at around 2MHz (the Earth's natural frequency is around 6MHz) producing an amount of energy equivalent to approximately ten megatons of TNT. He intended that all that energy could be focused on anything, with predictably devastating results.

Technology has far surpassed Tesla's initial experiments but it is also in the hands of the evil men of the USA military/industrial complex.

Hazel WM McKinlay

(Reference; Alien Intent-- Raymond Robinson.)

Think about it;

if the WTC had not collapsed into a heap of rubble, there would be no images to outrage the public with, other than two buildings charred at the top and a few hundred casualties. Bad enough, but not serious enough to declare war and mobilise the US military and NATO.

But the aerial pictures now being beamed around the World..continuously, depict a 'war zone,' total destruction and carnage, being imprinted on the mind by the media propaganda machine. Not to mention the initial strike, caught on camera by a crew, on the spot, filming (as you do) a "routine drain inspection."

The US military is the tightest, most secretive and secure, technologically advanced complex on Earth, monitoring all the movements and communications of potential 'terrorists' or 'subversives,' yet we are expected to believe that they had no previous intelligence of a carefully planned attack, executed with military precision, by a 'rag-tag' group of suicidal fanatics?

But, despite what the media are saying, they are losing the propaganda war already, this is backfiring, the horror has mobilised people for peace and anti-war demonstrations. However, that will not deter the NWO.

Peace,
Hazel

http://shelf3d.com/k9CgJYeTxFE#Nikola Tesla - Device to End Wars - Electric Arc Aircraft Dustify World Trade Center 9/11

Nikola Tesla - Device to End Wars - Electric Arc Aircraft Dustify World Trade Center 9/11

By: Annie Wyers | Minutes: 05:39 | Views: 2,082
Uploaded: February 14th, 2013 (7 months ago)
Powered by Translate

In 1917, Nikola Tesla invents a device that would End All Wars. Tesla's Invention would "turn every atom of the (World Trade Center) on 9/11 to de-materialized whitened ashes". "War is a Thousand Infernos" (1000 Points of Light) Nikola Tesla's predictive essay on Weapons of Mass Destruction

Bob

14th September 2013, 05:59

Tesla_WTC _ I love your posts, clarity is something I appreciate and the references are wonderful.

I've followed the various satellite gravity field reports too, but I have not kept up with any real time readings. I have looked at the anomaly locations to kinda get a good idea what could be unusual under the sea floor or on specific continents. Some people have asked me about various hydrocarbon and water formations in the earth, for economic and humanitarian reasons, so that primarily has been my use of geo search sensing satellites. (really interesting Lunar gravity readings if you get some time to take a look, the geometries showing up on the BACK side of the moon are very odd)..

Back to Hutch's metal melting.. We are going to get into a bit of technical jargon.

When a structure, like Iron, or lets stick with something more known about, Neodymium or Samarium is nuclear altered to the ISOMER state, the atom has the capacity to absorb phenomenal amounts of energy. Those two atoms are used in rare earth magnets for instance, and the ability to concentrate magnetic charge is pretty high. SO the point is anything that has the capacity to create a stable ISOMER is something to watch very carefully. It kinda goes something like this - a charged nuclear isomer of a certain atom (i won't get into the exact atoms that have been tested for obvious reasons) about the size of a person's finger ring (a few grams), if charged fully and the charge released (instantaneously) it would generate an energy yield equating to the output of one small 20 kiloton nuclear device. Detonation for instance could consist of a brief EMP evoking soft X-rays, about 20 kilovolts worth of charge. Something hundreds of feet in size containing nuclear isomers or experiencing a virtual nuclear isomer characteristic is unimaginable. Ya metal melts like putty if thats the case if it were able to hold together before reaching vapor state..

There are methods to use PHONON excitation, that will create triggered release of stored charges. It looks like a cascade effect which instead of diminishing over time, actually increases nuclear bond splitting as if a massive neutron source has been impinged upon the target atom.

Those two methods are the only workable "science" behind Hutch's massive random overload "hit it with everything she's got" approach, "something will work". I frankly can't agree with shotgunning approaches as it never solves the mechanism of the observation - what happened really?

I have seen and personally experienced very small quantity isomer release. An intense gamma ray burst does happen during the release.

As to Japan, nuclear reactors have a nasty habit of forming nuclear isomers. That has been a problem in some reactors going uncontrollable. There are reports if I remember right, in both LANL and LBL in Fremont CA on the various isomer weapons and "progress" (not). Like I said I experienced isomer charging and triggered release in a microscopic amount.

There are methods to induce the effects remotely using the steering system previously mentioned whereas the lowband RF becomes the carrier. Tesla had indeed observed some of these reactions and got quite into hoping for ways to "end wars". create offensive and defensive shields. Bearden goes heavily into that concept but uses "scalar transmitters" as the excitation source and totally takes people into a path that is unable to be duplicated. Then with such observations, and seeing that the weapons are being used by somebody out there, obviously the published explanations of "how it works" cannot be how it works, can it?

As to the PSIOPS merit of creating a horrendous disaster, PSIOPS does what it believes is needed to create the necessary scenario to accomplish the mission. Folks are skilled, the technology exists.

As to the conveyance methods to induce effect at a distance, no question. As to what to do to the target, if it is going to be nuclear isomer remote triggering, or plasma event reaction on a target at a distance, or phonon collapse - each is a skill and technique, just saying the technology to do such things has been around at least since 1974 ish, explored by some groups back then. Tesla showed, RF can be transferred, and he quite possibly did experience Longitudinal waves as well as phonon excitation, but lacked the words or background to take it and reduce it reliably. Tesla could visualize a lot, but he needed about 40 more years to complete what he was working with. He needed steering methods, and he did not have such so he wasted energy on omni-directional situations.

His transmitters were "point source". And a spherical wavefront traveled outwards. Great start of the science, but the follow-through was cut-off by Morgan, that bastard money grubbing shortage manipulator. ( I do disagree with the 1-2 megahertz natural resonant frequency citing on Earth Resonance - those frequencies are stopped at a shallow depth, and would never reach through the earth and back again to cause the "bell" (the earth) to ring and store energy. 24 kilohertz for instance way lower than Tesla was being cited as using only can penetrate about 100 meters into the earth before being cancelled out. )

SO ya, WTC definitely allowed for mobilization. Lots of PSIOPS came out of that, and lots of controls, that is the nature of the evolution of the system into a larger "order" they say.

I understand the fascination with Hutch's experiences, I trust the explanation above shows some of the physics behind the extreme energy phenomenon happening in the various places that go above and beyond the chemical reactions that you pointed out as possibles which were looked at as the accelerant.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

14th September 2013, 16:31

Thank you for that great post :) [and the others too!]

I would like to go back to college again so that I could better understand some of the physics.
People need to figure some of this out for themselves, but that's quite the task in our world.

Have you looked at that Russian device, hm -- it looks like a big white tube or Q-tip resembling pipe, with round chambers built onto the ends?
I guess the idea is that manipulating certain nuclear interactions inside this thing can displace a blast, i.e. you set off a nuke in one place and the boom happens at another?

This could explain some of the flashes/endothermic reactions seen by Japanese aircraft over the ocean/mountains while near Russia, right?

Of course assuming what you said is true, there is no longer any need for such a large machine in order to cause a relatively small explosion.
However it might not leave traces of its operation behind like an actual substance at the site might, i.e. thermite vs. remote induction.

I guess what fascinated me about Hutchison was the idea that remote induction of the right type, yes he is general and doesn't understand it well yet, could compromise certain kinds of metal. Sending a signal through magnetized metal, a signal that is already twisting, what could that do to a substance whose molecules are arranged in a more linear grid. Would it possibly cause deformation or actual deconsisting of the metal as perceived by us?

It's hard for me to know which questions to ask. I mean unless the device completely consumed itself, or worked from a distance, wouldn't someone find the evidence?

That is why I supported the idea of a remote interaction, however our gov't has the power to cover up almost anything no matter how messy LOL

p.s. When JP Morgan's boat went down and his competitor and supporter of Tesla's work, Astor, went down with it, I would imagine that Tesla's ability to make progress took a large hit. An indirect but very effective hit.

Also how familiar are you with the idea that Tesla and Jules Verne had already come up with the idea of electric and remotely-steered submarines?

I've written about that before and asked the question of whether Titanic hit an iceberg at all, or if it was a crude submarine of some kind with a ramming prow that actually struck the vessel.

They weren't able to get a good look at the ice from what I've read.
On darker evenings certain kinds of ice melts look almost black on the surface.
Kind of like the hull of a sub LOL

Bob

14th September 2013, 22:06

Thank you for that great post :) [and the others too!]

I would like to go back to college again so that I could better understand some of the physics.
People need to figure some of this out for themselves, but that's quite the task in our world.

Howdy Tesla_WTC_ (that sure is long, do you have a shorter nick? Zeva?)

College is good if you know you will be getting rote repeats of status quo. There are ways though to obtain associates and or researcher status to have access to everything, labs and profs, just it has to be customized with the College to do that. It won't be accredited as points to some degree, but if you want the data more than the status and title, it shouldn't matter. There are private organizations, research centers also available around the world with cutting edge views, and some who aren't purely military industrial complex, more like renaissance institutes.

Have you looked at that Russian device, hm -- it looks like a big white tube or Q-tip resembling pipe, with round chambers built onto the ends?
I guess the idea is that manipulating certain nuclear interactions inside this thing can displace a blast, i.e. you set off a nuke in one place and the boom happens at another?

I have seen various types of devices, some are radionic/psychotronic that look like that design, but there are also depending on the stuff that is in side, those types of structures could be weather raydomes (or cylinders) to protect the antennas inside (some microwave towers are disguised as that to be more aesthetic).

I think you would have a lot of interesting research looking into nuclear isomers. As far as ultimate energy sources and batteries, those would do it. I am thinking of restarting my isomer research, was working with that back in 1988 when I had some of those catastrophic explosions take out some of the apparatus. The side effect was also mindblowing - the hardest things bent - the softest things nothing happened, and the atmosphere, water froze at many different temperatures for about a week after the effect - like 20 dgrees F it would start to freeze, but be more like mush, and at times even at 50 degrees water would be freezing - it was very unpredictable, something like an oscillation.. Shortly after that effect I spotted a type of military F16 type of Jet flying in the area, as one could tell by the noise, then it made a straight up flight, like 90 degrees straight up above the area the anomaly explosion was in, and it disappeared. SO it reminded me of the effects Hutch had accidentally stumbled into, the harder the object the easier it melted. Me, I saw the metal turned to DUST, crystalline and fractured with the slightest stress..

This could explain some of the flashes/endothermic reactions seen by Japanese aircraft over the ocean/mountains while near Russia, right?

Of course assuming what you said is true, there is no longer any need for such a large machine in order to cause a relatively small explosion.
However it might not leave traces of its operation behind like an actual substance at the site might, i.e. thermite vs. remote induction.

I know the technique - if a isomer can be induced phononically through a radio wave carrier, the effect will happen, and the diabolical uses of such is beyond belief. I know what happened, how, and why. The physics is solid.

I guess what fascinated me about Hutchison was the idea that remote induction of the right type, yes he is general and doesn't understand it well yet, could compromise certain kinds of metal.

Sending a signal through magnetized metal, a signal that is already twisting, what could that do to a substance whose molecules are arranged in a more linear grid.

Would it possibly cause deformation or actual deconsisting of the metal as perceived by us?

I think you are very accurate here especially asking the right questions. Making a metal magnetized (held still in other words, aligning domains) means you have a better type of control on the metal. Entrainment in other words on a molecular and finally ionic and finally atomic core nuclear level would all be possible depending on the level of field wavelength being used.

In 1967 i published a very small article on Laser Fusion, working with hydrogen carbon dioxide as the two carrier and media gasses. In powering the device up it was way over unity. And totally "ignored" by the establishment in public but obviously the expression living under the microscope is an understatement. I did mention some of the "owlies" had asked me to visit the big bird and party.. I think that's just a reminder they still pull all the strings. I think I would enjoy the beautiful redwoods - they hold a great musical as well.

It's hard for me to know which questions to ask. I mean unless the device completely consumed itself, or worked from a distance, wouldn't someone find the evidence?

That is why I supported the idea of a remote interaction, however our gov't has the power to cover up almost anything no matter how messy LOL

EMP machines will destroy themselves, the charge that makes the pulse is consumed by the current. The systems that I mention, the permanently mounted system are able to withstand immense amounts of current. Take a look at the massive generators and powerstations that deal with hydroelectric power - take how CHINA is making unbelievably massive magnetic machine generators driven by immense hydro power sources. The technology is able to withstand the current and not vaporize if the technology is not designed to induce EMP. STEERING doesn't need a linear type of antenna to beam something.

p.s. When JP Morgan's boat went down and his competitor and supporter of Tesla's work, Astor, went down with it, I would imagine that Tesla's ability to make progress took a large hit. An indirect but very effective hit.

Also how familiar are you with the idea that Tesla and Jules Verne had already come up with the idea of electric and remotely-steered submarines?

Very familiar. Remote control of an rudder is not hard, nor were some of the automatons which were built in those days. I think it was a shame Astor went down. Remember Waldorf Astoria is where Tesla finally retreated to, and he was looking out of the apartment window during a lightning storm when he stroked out, an OK death.. After the OBE at the funeral procession, he was up in the Rafters looking downwards. He decided to beam out, like a starburst everything he had into the consciousness matrix when he left.. nice gesture to sorta not loose it all.. anyway interesting stories on that.. Those are the stories told, and lots of people afterwards have seemed to "channel" Tesla. I believe they picked up on the matrix splash of his personal identity (and experience) when all that happened. Ghost stories are quite an interesting topic, especially being able to do a scan on an object and pick up the quantum hologram making it up (and layer within to get to the information on it/in it).

I've written about that before and asked the question of whether Titanic hit an iceberg at all, or if it was a crude submarine of some kind with a ramming prow that actually struck the vessel.

They weren't able to get a good look at the ice from what I've read.
On darker evenings certain kinds of ice melts look almost black on the surface.
Kind of like the hull of a sub LOL

Titanic - lots of stories on that.. Lots of powerful people were taken out leaving a particular group remaining in power.. I believe there is a lot to that changing of the guard..

And I do love your posts - I took a look at all your threads the other nite. Simply brilliant :)

Tesla_WTC_Solution

15th September 2013, 19:06

Bobd, I have the feeling it would take me years to be able to discuss some of the things you mentioned there, especially the nuclear stuff.
No wonder radioactive material is so controlled and policed --

Did I tell you that my grandfather worked in missile maintenance and was part of a launching crew?
He wasn't able to say much about work except declassified generalities later in life -- in fact he was one of the more secretive AF employees and didn't even tell his wife about it until it was declassified.

I am very interested in the architectural implications of some of these items/concepts.
Although in our time, these devices have been used for destructive purposes, it could well happen in the future that people use them to dig out habitable sites on foreign worlds.

In fact that reminds me of the "Stone Burner" device from Herbert's fiction -- a variable strength nuclear borer/melter that could literally drop into the core of a planet and destabilize it; on lower settings it simple caused blindness.

That man was a wizard :) lol!
Too bad Tesla didn't write some books like those.
His work would have lived longer.

p.s. Your story about your home laboratory work reminds me of that Reader's Digest kid who collected over 1,000 smoke detectors to harvest the radioactive material inside them, and made a proton gun, and irradiated the neighborhood, lol!
Apparently the authorities noticed his "hot spot", carted his lab away, and gave him a job -- but they told him he had taken about 10 years off of his life in the process of making his discoveries.

p.p.s. read my posts with a large grain of salt handy. some of them don't make much sense, haha

Bob

15th September 2013, 22:53

Hia Tesla_Wtc -

Any subject is simple provided one can get the idea of what it is one is looking at. I get into the identification step - what is it.. ok, how did it get here, is it something that only exists on the micro and not the macro.. or on the macro and not the micro.. then one can develop work-ability with it. It would never take years unless you wanted it to.

I don't think you ever mentioned your grandfather worked on missiles - agreed a lot is classified for reasons of national security. Cold war era was quite a time, stressful for everyone.

I like your idea to turn lemons into lemonade , reversing weapons into plows. I had some very nice discussions with inventors of transmutation technology, more so than having to deal with brute force tunneling, but moving into transmutation of rock into gases for instance. With minimal energy mass issues (i.e. it takes X heat calories of heat to boil something, and in the boiling, the liquefaction allows for transport of the target substance). Possibly if one looks at reality in a more holographic way, the mechanics of it all becomes easier to view. Distance coordinates no longer come into play, nor does mass, and energy is more like a philosophical construct instead of a 3D/4D reality.. (in other words there is a way to switch out of the taught limitations we have been compartmentalized into and move into the real dynamics of the universe).. Kinda like remembering what we have been taught comes from concepts over 1000 years ago, created, distributed (taught) in a control minded authoritarian society, where only a few were able to work with information (recall the point of women still these days in many places not being able to go to school or read a book).

It could be fun for you to explore some of the expeditions I am thinking about in looking for the underground tunnels leading into the earlier civilizations. I did post I think in the Dulce thread I have developed an underground surveying system (able to be used rapidly and quickly from the surface without needing to do seismic or boreholes). Something great portable - just need some of the right locations to look in..

Ah funny, the mention of the childhood lab - I think I was 14 at the time, what was it, 1964 maybe; the Health Department actually came by and we talked at length about how one would actually get the permits to work with Cobalt-60 for some transmutation experiments I wanted to demonstrate. Instead I settled for Laser Fusion and they were happy with that.. Can't say they ever offered me a job tho, ahahahah. The transmutation work using Gamma modulation on the carrier was very solid physics and still is.. Everything was a function of getting all the wavelengths just right. That's kinda where the nuclear isomers can be explored. I don't think my intent back then was to develop an isomer using laser excimer gases, like fluorine/xenon combinations but instead I felt that hydrogen and carbon dioxide matched the energy levels I wanted to work with, to evoke the phonon fields within.

Summary point - there are modulated directed plasma weapons systems that can be induced to create an effect remotely, not requiring satellites, but are land based.

No vehicle has to be present nearby, nor does there have to be any laser pointing to paint a target.

Tesla type of transmitters are used, but there are special steering systems used to direct. Lastly the modulation riding on the directed carriers will induce the desired effect at the target - if it is melt steel, or pulverize concrete.

It does not require any "exotic physics" to explain how it works at the target. It neither requires any exotic delivery system to get it across the planet for instance and effect something many thousands of miles away from the target.

It is insidious and infernal and something that is not covered by ANY of the existing treaties.
Bob

Dennis Leahy

23rd May 2014, 18:58

I'm going to reply (I don't know why - I should have my head examined for blowing on these embers, again) to a post made in a new thread (a new Gordon Duff article in Veterans Today) about Israeli/Mossad involvement/spearheading of 9/11, using multiple, small nuclear devices to bring down the towers. Here's the post:

all I can say to spiritguide's posting is: read Dr. Judy Wood's monumental "Where Did the Towers Go? for an "alternative" view of 9/11-

is there anyone out there in "Avalonian Land" who has not yet read this book!?- if not, you might want to get off of this website and read her book- just a suggestion-

please be well all-

Larry
Hi Larry,

I did not want to dilute and divert yet another 9/11 thread about nuclear devices with Judy Woods theories, so I copied your response to that other thread into this thread - and old Judy Wood/Hutchinson 9/11 thread.

I feel like, at some point, even Judy Wood herself has to admit that what she proposed was at best highly implausible, and the actual evidence brings it closer to impossible. Everything points to 9/11 as being a nuclear event, or rather, a series of tiny (by nuclear event proportions) nuclear events. If you watch the towers come down - in slow motion - you can clearly see a series of explosions from top to bottom in the towers. Don't let anyone explain away what you can see with your own two eyes: individual, discrete explosions. (We cannot see the large explosions in the basement area that were evidently aimed straight up the central core.)

To believe that the individual, discrete explosions that are clearly seen - exploding OUTWARDS from the building - are being made by some sort of plasma/energy weapon is to also believe that there were many multiple plasma weapons INSIDE the towers, directing energy outward, and firing sequentially to mimic the effect of bombs. Believing that these bad guys had secret, invisible, plasma/energy weapons capable of doing this, stationed within each building every few floors is giving immense credit where it is not due. You'd also have to believe that the energy weapons left the signature of mini-nukes, and left the radioactive damage to humans mimicking nukes. You also have to believe that nuclear explosions cannot twist steel, or fuse molten steel with concrete, and that the unknown mystery energy weapon also SOMEHOW supplies energy far after the towers were dropped, to maintain the extreme heat seen in zones beneath the rubble (which IS a side effect of a nuclear device.)

It walks like a nuke, it quacks like a nuke... but it's a directed energy weapon?

I apologize if this is offensive to anyone. I know some of you (including some I consider friends) are locked-in to 9/11 being a directed energy display. That's OK; believe whatever you want. But, as I have asked before on several occasions, I don't think it is fair to insert Judy Wood into every discussion about nukes on 9/11 - and Judy Wood HAS gotten injected into virtually every Avalon discussion about 9/11 being a nuclear event.

Dennis

ThePythonicCow

23rd May 2014, 19:14

Carmody

23rd May 2014, 19:57

A person of perfect actions,perfect for an entire lifetime...only needs to be wrong once, before total dismissal of them and their story is available to those who are difficult to convince.

Such a psychology is not a good thing to have in one's corner, but we're talking about people, who in all likelihood.. don't really know what the word psychology means.

If they understood, then these problems would not exist. This world would be far more functional.

Thus, our problems do not really center around what is correct, in action and thought, what is true or false, and so on....the problem exists in the psychology and understanding of psychology, self, etc...in people.

In the vast majority of global, or regional, or municipal, or even personal issues in this world, in any shape or form....the problems, the choke points - have never been in facts or disputed facts, but squarely within the people.

All of the worlds problems, from personal to global, in any fashion, are people problems, internal human problems. Every last one of them.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

24th May 2014, 04:37

here is a little piece of advice about the military, technology they use, and policy:

REDUNDANCY
Plan A
B
C
D
E
F
G
H
I
J
K
....

should I go on?

Whether it happened one way or another, matters less to me than figuring out who, why, when --

Do you agree that nukes are a scarier option, due to the breakdown of security involved?
That if this IS what happened, it's easier to blame on some Arab nation (please watch Edge of Darkness with Mel Gibson for elaboration on the covert dirty bombs theory)?

Do you agree that because of the lack of treaties, remote warfare is superior although risky due to the possibility of discover/declassification of the tech?
But due to the lack of paper trail, far more effective than a nuke that leaves a signature/i.e. easy to see where the material came from?

It's a huge dilemma.

But JHC don't get stuck up people and assume you know it all.

LMFAO

I tested pretty high in school -- not an all around smart cookie but i have my gifts.
and i think it was Tesla tech of some kind or I would never have come here.

And governor ventura thought it was plausible too and you guys keep totally ignoring that guy.

why would that be.

Tesla_WTC_Solution

11th January 2015, 19:25

Hey all, I wanted to update this thread because of something I caught in a CNN video about the new US Navy electromagnetic warfare equipment.

http://i60.tinypic.com/bf49x1.jpg

for years without actually having "insider knowledge" I've been pointing at this company (hugs Bill!!) BAE Systems, wondering if they had access to this type of technology (scalar dew), and if this has anything to do with the dubious "official story of 9/11" foisted on us --

long story short, due to their experience with HAARP and other contracts, I pegged BAE as a likely candidate for having the expertise to pull off such a huge and delicate job as 9/11.

'precise electromagnetic cavitation' was one of the terms I used,
then we found out about the Hutchison effect and other such effects of electricity that allow for the remote destruction/manipulation/weaponization of magnetic materials

CNN video link here: http://www.cnn.com/videos/tech/2015/01/08/electromagnetic-railgun-us-navy-weapon-orig-mg.cnn

please pray for the US

http://imageshack.us/a/img12/2120/tesla3.png

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Directed-energy_weapon

A directed-energy weapon (DEW) emits highly focused energy, transferring that energy to a target to damage it.

Potential applications of this technology include anti-personnel weapon systems, potential missile defense system, and the disabling of lightly armored vehicles such as cars, drones, jet skis, and electronic devices such as mobile phones.[1][2]

The energy can come in various forms:
Electromagnetic radiation, including radio frequency, microwave, lasers and masers
Particles with mass, in particle-beam weapons (technically a form of micro-projectile weapon)
Sound, in sonic weapons

“Absolute power does not corrupt absolutely, absolute power attracts the corruptible.”
― Frank Herbert