Secret government documents reveal vaccines to be a total hoax Learn

[onawah]

This certainly looks like it deserves our attention, and if it's as good as it looks at first glance, at least, it could have a significant impact:


(NaturalNews) If you have children, you are more than likely already aware of the official U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) "Immunization Schedules," which today recommend an astounding 29 vaccines be given between birth and six years of age, including yearly flu shots, as well as another five to 16 vaccines between ages seven and 18 (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/schedules/). But a recent investigative report compiled by Dr. Lucija Tomljenovic, Ph.D., uncovers more than 30 years of hidden government documents exposing these vaccine schedules as a complete hoax, not to mention the fraud of the vaccines themselves to provide any real protection against disease.

Though her paper focuses primarily on the British health system's elaborate cover-up of the dirty truth about its own national vaccination program, the tenets of the study's findings still apply to vaccination schedules in general, which are typically designed for the purpose of serving corporate interests rather than public health. Government authorities, it turns out, in an ongoing bid to satisfy the private goals of the vaccine industry, have deliberately covered up pertinent information about the dangers and ineffectiveness of vaccines from parents in order to maintain a high rate of vaccination compliance. And in the process, they have put countless millions of children at risk of serious side effects and death.

You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

Hiding the truth and covering up data to encourage vaccine compliance
Through several Freedom of Information Act (FOIA) requests, Dr. Tomljenovic was able to obtain transcripts of private meetings that were held between the Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization (JCVI), a so-called "independent expert advisory committee" that makes recommendations to the government about vaccine policy, and various British health ministers over the years. And after poring through this plethora of information, which had previously been veiled from public view, Dr. Tomljenovic made some disturbing discoveries.

"[T]he JCVI (Joint Committee on Vaccination and Immunization) made continuous efforts to withhold critical data on severe adverse reactions and contraindications to vaccinations to both parents and health practitioners in order to reach overall vaccination rates which they deemed were necessary for 'herd immunity,' a concept which ... does not rest on solid scientific evidence," explains Dr. Tomljenovic in the introduction to her paper.

"Official documents obtained from the U.K. Department of Health (DH) and the JCVI reveal that the British health authorities have been engaging in such practice for the last 30 years, apparently for the sole purpose of protecting the national vaccination program."

These are some strong accusations, but the information Dr. Tomljenovic gathered speaks for itself. Not only did the JCVI routinely ignore questions of safety as they came up with regards to the ever-expanding vaccination schedule, but the group actively censored unfavorable data that shed a "negative" light on vaccines in order to maintain the illusion that vaccines are safe and effective. Beyond this, the JCVI regularly lied to both the public and government authorities about vaccine safety in order to ensure that people continued to vaccinate their kids.

You can access Dr. Tomljenovic's full paper here:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

JCVI was fully aware of MMR vaccine dangers as early as 1989, but covered them up
Beginning on page three of her report, Dr. Tomljenovic begins outlining the sordid details of meetings held as early as 1981 where the JCVI clearly engaged in fraud, cover-up, and lies about vaccines to protect the vaccine industry, not children, from harm. Minutes from these meetings reveal that the JCVI actively tried to cover up severe side effects associated with common vaccines like measles and whooping cough (pertussis), both of which were clearly linked at the time to causing severe brain damage in a substantial percentage of the children that received them.

Of particular concern was how the JCVI handled unfavorable data on the controversial MMR vaccine for measles, mumps, and rubella. 10 years before Dr. Andrew Wakefield published his study on MMR in The Lancet, JCVI was already fully aware that the National Institute for Biological Standards and Control (NIBSC) had identified a clear link between MMR and vaccine-induced meningitis and encephalitis. But rather than come forward with this information and call for further safety assessments on the vaccine, the JCVI instead censored this critical information from the public, and blatantly lied about the safety of MMR for years.

"The extent of the JCVI's concerns with the implications of scientific assessment of vaccine safety on vaccine policy explains why they were opposed to any long-term surveillance for severe neurological disorders following vaccination," writes Dr. Tomljenovic. "[I]nstead of re-evaluating the vaccination policy, at least until safety concerns were fully evaluated, the JCVI chose to support the existing policy based on incomplete evidence that was available at that time."

In other words, the JCVI was more concerned with protecting the reputation of the dangerous MMR vaccine, as well as many other questionable vaccines, than with protecting children from sustaining serious injuries as a result of getting the jabs. As far as the MMR vaccine is concerned, this critical piece of information not only reinforces the legitimacy of Dr. Wakefield's findings from 10 years later, which were illegitimately declared to be fraudulent by the establishment, but also illustrates just how painfully long this scam has been taking place.

Vaccine companies urged to manipulate data sheets, skew safety studies to promote vaccines
If this is not bad enough, Dr. Tomljenovic also drudged up copious amounts of information on the JCVI's longtime habit of encouraging vaccine companies to deliberately alter their data sheets in order to make dangerous and ineffective vaccines appear safe and effective, in accordance with their recommendations. When the JCVI's guidance contraindications for MMR, for instance, did not match those of the vaccine's manufacturer, JCVI apparently instructed the manufacturer to alter its data sheets to avoid "legal problems."

Similarly, the JCVI's official policy was to cherry-pick unreliable studies to support its own opinions on vaccines rather than rely on independent, scientifically-sound studies to make vaccine policy recommendations. Once again, the JCVI's position on the safety and effectiveness of MMR is an excellent example of this, as the group flat out ignored legitimate MMR studies in favor of industry-backed junk studies like the infamous 2005 Cochrane Review, which technically proves nothing about the alleged safety of MMR because the 31 studies it evaluated did not even meet the group's basic methodological criteria.

"Over the years, the JCVI has consistently promoted the MMR vaccine as safe, based on studies that have been proven to be either irrelevant, inconclusive, or methodologically questionable," explains Dr. Tomljenovic, adding that the JCVI routinely chose to rely on flawed epidemiological studies that only identified "association" rather than "causation," a rather ironic inaccuracy in light of how scrutinizing the establishment typically is of studies that contradict its own positions.

The eye-opening, 45-page paper goes on to explain how vaccine schedules were established through the calculated downplaying of vaccine safety concerns and the over-inflating of vaccine benefits; the promotion of dangerous new vaccines into the pediatric schedule through deception; the discouraging of vaccine safety follow-up studies; and the widespread brainwashing of the public through manipulation and scientific sleight-of-hand tricks.

Be sure to check out the complete study for yourself:
http://www.ecomed.org.uk/wp-content/uploads/2011/09/3-tomljenovic.pdf

Sources for this article include:

http://childhealthsafety.wordpress.com

http://foodfreedomgroup.com

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html#ixzz2HNHZMde8




http://www.naturalnews.com/038598_vaccines_medical_hoax_government_documents.html
l
Tuesday, January 08, 2013 by: Ethan A. Huff, staff writer

[soleil]

*gulp* yikes....

[onawah]

Over Forty Children Paralyzed by Vaccines in One Village

I am feeling a bit elated that this story has come out just one day after the first one I posted in this thread.
If 2013 is the year that the light is shown on the dangers of vaccines enough so that the deniers :lalala:are finally discredited, it will give me a lot of hope for resolution of other issues that are long overdue, as well.
Not to mention a humungous sigh of relief for the millions of children of this world whose health and lives hang in the balance. :whoo::hail::pray::high5::rockon::clap2:

Posted by Dr Sircus on January 8, 2013
http://drsircus.com/world-news/over-forty-children-paralyzed-by-vaccines-in-one-village

Description: http://www.polioeradication.org/Portals/0/Image/Photos/PhotoEssays/Nigeria/img_2544.jpg

I am so glad (not!) that we have people like Bill Gates to make sure vaccines are funded for African children. I am not alone in that perspective but there are brave people like Christina England, a U.K. journalist and author who alone is reporting about the unspeakable harm that international vaccination programs bring to the children of the world.

Christina reports that:

On December 20, 2012, a vaccination tragedy hit the small village of Gouro, located in northern Chad, Africa. According to the newspaper La Voix, out of 500 children who received the new meningitis vaccine MenAfriVac, at least 40 of them between the ages of 7 and 18 have become paralyzed. Those children also suffered hallucinations and convulsions.

Since this report, the true extent of this tragedy is coming to light, as parents of these vaccinated children have reported yet more injuries. The authorities in the area are shaken, as citizens set fire to a sanitary administration vehicle in a demonstration of their frustration and anger at the government’s negligence.

At the end of her report England asks:

How can at least 40 children become paralyzed after receiving a vaccine, and no news organizations provide coverage of this disturbing situation? The media has gone completely silent. There appear to be no reports of this incident on any government website. The only available information, apart from this one newspaper report, appears to be buried on a small blog titled, “Le blog de Makaila,” which has been reporting regular updates on the situation.

Where are statements from the involved organizations – WHO, GAVI, PATH, UNICEF and the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation? Why has this vaccination program not been suspended? What are these organizations going to do about the atrocity that has happened in Gouro?

Description: vaccines paralyzed mmr 1

Emma is a little six-year-old girl who is suffering from severe vaccine damage that has been verified by several leading experts. Emma is totally paralyzed and unable to move any part of her body. She cannot speak and breathes with the aid of a small tube inserted through a tiny incision in her windpipe called a tracheotomy. (The picture above is Emma at around age two.)

England writes:

Instead of the help and compensation her family should be receiving, Emma has been stolen by the state and spends her days in what her mother describes as a “dreadful institution for the disabled.” Instead of the support Emma’s mother needs to come to terms with what has happened to her daughter, she has been accused of trying too hard to find answers and get the professional help that she believes her daughter needs.

I wrote in “Vaccine Damages Are No One’s Illusion” that India has seen three vaccine disasters in 2010, resulting in four deaths after the measles vaccine and six deaths after the HPV vaccine. Also, in 2010 Poland became the only country to reject H1N1 vaccines.

Description: Description: http://i.i.com.com/cnwk.1d/i/tim/2010/09/09/image6850366x.jpg
Nine-year-old Hannah Poling is shown.
(AP Photo/Atlanta Journal-Constitution, John Spink)

The first court award in a vaccine-autism claim was a big one. Hannah Poling will receive more than $1.5 million for her life care, lost earnings, and pain and suffering for the first year alone. In addition to the first year, the family will receive more than $500,000 per year to pay for Hannah’s care.

It is clear that vaccine damages can be life-long and cost a fortune to the family as well as the state. Medical officials still say there is nothing to worry about, but when we look under the hood of vaccine dangers and damages we find a completely different story.

[mahalall]

It is interesting to note that the MenAfriVac.

Is not listed on the (American) National Vaccine Information Centre listings.

http://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php


Wonder why?

[topspot37]

when are the general population going to wake up and realize that they're Government DO NOT have they're best interest at heart.

[onawah]

For those unconvinced that vaccines are unsafe, I recommend this very succinct and well documented article. If you go to the link, you can also download a free book on the subject:
http://vactruth.com/vaccine-books/

http://vactruth.com/2013/02/10/vaccines-are-unsafe/


9 Magic Words Prove Vaccines Are Unavoidably Unsafe
Feb 10th, 2013 | By Jeffry John Aufderheide

If you are deciding to get your child vaccinated, ask your doctor the important question.

Have you ever asked your doctor about the safety of vaccines, only to have your concerns dismissed? If so, you’re not alone.

Doctors are quick to tell you there is nothing to worry about. They are quick to say something like, “The chance of your child having a bad reaction is one in a million.”

This is really incredible, since toxic vaccines are manufactured using monkey kidneys, mouse brains, fetal calf serum, and even aborted babies (human diploid cells). But as much as a doctor would like to dismiss your concerns, there is a magic question you can ask which will prove to you that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe. If you read the entire article, I promise it will be worth it.

Before I tell you the magic question, you should be aware of how the government handles unsafe products.
Here Is How the Government Handles Unsafe Products

To get a feel for how protected dangerous vaccines are from any scrutiny from the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) and the Centers for Disease Control (CDC), let’s take a look at how they respond to other instances in which people fall ill or die from products they deem to be unsafe.

1. Contaminated Heparin Injections (2-28-2008): The FDA investigated all of Baxter Pharmaceuticals Healthcare Corporation’s multi-dose and single-dose vials of heparin sodium for injection, as well as HEP-LOCK heparin flush product, for adverse reactions. 246 deaths and many adverse side effects were reported following its use. [1]

Result: Product Recalled

2. Contaminated Cantaloupe (8-22-2012): The FDA and CDC investigated a multi-state outbreak of salmonella infections linked to cantaloupe originating from Chamberlain Farms Produce, Inc. 261 persons were infected with 3 deaths reported. [2]

Result: Product Recalled

3. Contaminated Peanut Butter (9-17-2012): The FDA and CDC investigated a multi-state outbreak of salmonella infections linked to Trader Joe’s Valencia Creamy Salted Peanut Butter, made by Sunland, Inc. Forty-two people were infected. [3]

Result: Product Recalled

4. Contaminated Spinach (11-2-2012): A total of 33 persons infected with E. coli were investigated by the FDA and CDC. It was traced back to Wegmans Organic Spinach and Spring Mix. [4]

Result: Product Recalled

5. Contaminated Steroid Injections (12-12-2012): The FDA and CDC investigated an outbreak of meningitis among patients who had received an epidural steroid injection. [5]

Result: Product Recalled

There are many examples of how the FDA and CDC operate, and some people even say this is proof that “the system” works. To a degree, the system does work—but contaminated vaccines are untouchable.

Here’s what you need to know.

Are Vaccines Contaminated? Well … Yes.

Vaccines have a long history of being filthy and contaminated.

This problem has been going on for a very long time and continues today. This is why it’s important for you to recognize how the vaccine industry has crafted specific language around vaccines and the manufacturing process using such words as “purified,” “purification process,” “lifesaving,” and “safe.” If you listen closely, you will hear doctors repeat the same language over and over to parents. The intention is to disarm you from asking questions.

I want to share this information with you so you can get a sense for how long this problem has been ignored.
A Cancer-Causing Monkey Virus Contaminated Vaccines?

In the 1950s and 1960s, the polio vaccine was manufactured using monkey kidneys to grow the viruses.

Bernice Eddy, who at the time was a scientist at the Division of Biologics Standards (DBS), discovered a major problem. Page 500 of the Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session. April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972, states:

“The next and only serious vaccine crisis that has occurred since the polio episode was the realization in mid-1961 that a monkey virus later shown to cause tumors in hamsters was contaminating both polio and adenovirus vaccines. The virus, known as SV40, was entering the vaccines and, just as in the polio case was surviving the formalin [form of formaldehyde] treatment.

There were several states by which the full extent of the SV40 problem became known. First was the discovery in 1959-1960 by a DBS [Division of Biologics Standards] scientist, once again Bernice Eddy, that an unknown agent in the monkey kidney cells used to produce polio and adenovirus vaccines would cause tumors when the cells were injected into hamsters.” [6](Emphasis mine)

Page 505 of the same congressional document declares,

“…even when the contaminating virus was found to be oncogenic [cancer causing] in hamsters, the DBS [Division of Biologics Standards – National Institute of Health] and its expert advisory committee decided to leave existing stocks on the market rather than risk eroding public confidence by a recall…There has been a tendency on the part of certain higher government circles to play down any open discussion of problems associated with vaccines…” (Emphasis mine)

Even to this day, the Centers for Disease Control plays damage control and minimizes any problems associated with the cancer-causing monkey virus that contaminated the polio vaccine. [7]

There’s more.
Phages Contaminated Vaccines?

In February, 1975 Gina Bari Kolata wrote an article entitled “Phage in Live Virus Vaccines: Are They Harmful to People?” Gina Bari Kolata wrote:

Almost 2 years ago, scientists at the Bureau of Biologics of the Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reported that all live virus vaccines are grossly contaminated with phage (viruses that infect bacteria). . . This finding presented a problem since federal regulations forbade extraneous material in vaccines, and no one knew whether phage are harmful to human beings or whether they could be removed from vaccines. The temporary solution was to amend the regulations so as to permit phage in vaccines. [8] [emphasis mine]

Where did the bacteriophage come from?

According to the article, the phages, which are viruses that infect bacteria, contaminate the “fetal bovine serum” collected at the slaughterhouse that subsequently is used as vaccine growth medium. The filthy process of bovine “fetus management” was encapsulated in this manner:

The room is dirty and, according to one spokesman, “one minute you have nothing to do and the next minute you are literally knee deep in fetuses.” [8]

Kolata noted that one unintended consequence from the contamination was the phage’s ability to trigger a different disease. She explained that a person who was given the polio vaccine contaminated with diphtheria phage could actually contract diphtheria!

FDA’s tolerance of vaccine contaminants manifested years later. For example, a court case decided in 1987 revealed, “Each seed virus used in manufacture shall be demonstrated to be free of extraneous microbial agents except for unavoidable bacteriophage.” [9]
It Continues to This Day

This isn’t a problem that magically went away.

Bovine serum is frequently used as a growth medium as a part of the vaccine manufacturing process. It has been the major source of contamination in vaccines. [10] The most prevailing bovine contaminants are:

• bovine viral diarrhoea pestivirus
• parainfluenza virus type 3
• bovine herpesvirus 1
• bovine enterovirus type 4
• bovine orbivirus (bluetongue)
• bovine polyomavirus
• bovine parvoviruses [10, 11]

One paper suggests that vaccines contaminated with the bluetongue virus caused abortions in pregnant dogs. [12]

There are also patents to detect “new” pathogens that are likely contaminating other cell cultures to make flu vaccines. [13]

And to bring this full circle to the beginning of the article . . .

Contaminated Vaccines (1952–Today): The scientific literature has an abundance of evidence that vaccines are contaminated. The FDA and CDC have access to the very same information contained in this article—and much more. Vaccines are kept on the shelves even if they are contaminated because, if recalled, your confidence in vaccine safety and effectiveness would be eroded.

Result: Product Stays on the Shelf

Here is the magic 9-word question I promised you in the beginning of the article.
The 9 Magic Words

Here’s what I want you to do.

The next time you visit your doctor, after your doctor is done telling you how safe vaccines are, ask him this question with the 9 magic words: “If this vaccine injures my child, who is responsible?”

Your doctor will likely blush, get angry with you, or avoid the question altogether. What the doctor will avoid telling you is that vaccines are unavoidably unsafe! This means that even if vaccines are handled and given properly, some children will die or will be hurt.

The reality—and the answer to the question—is this: You are responsible if your child is injured!

The National Child Vaccine Injury Act of 1986 protects the manufacturer from liability for unavoidable adverse side effects as long as the vaccine is properly prepared and accompanied by the proper directions and warnings. [14]

The Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) also protects your doctor from any liability if a vaccine injures your baby.
Conclusion

If you decide to vaccinate your child, you do so at your own risk.

Your doctor can tell you vaccines are perfectly safe and your child will be “protected”, but the ones who are really “protected” are the doctors and the vaccine companies. What can you do? Take action right now.

Click on this link
http://vactruth.com/aboutand download the vaccine ingredients. Then, look at the vaccine schedule
http://vactruth.com/vaccine-schedule
and see what is going to be injected into your child.


References

1. www.fda.gov/drugs/drugsafety/postmarketdrugsafety…
2. www.cdc.gov/salmonella/typhimurium-cantaloupe-08-12/index.html
3. www.fda.gov/Food/FoodSafety/CORENetwork/ucm320413.htm
4. www.cdc.gov/ecoli/2012/O157H7-11-12/index.html
5. www.fda.gov/Drugs/DrugSafety/FungalMeningitis/default.htm
6. Executive Reorganization and Government Research of the Committee on Government Operations United States Senate, Ninety-Second Congress, Second Session, April 20, 21; and May 3, 4, 1972.
7. www.cdc.gov/vaccinesafety/updates/archive/polio_and_cancer.htm
8. www.sciencemag.org/content/187/4176/522.extract
9. Wade Baker and Rita Baker, Plaintiffs-Appellants, v. United States of America, Defendant-Appellee. No. 86-5578. Submitted Dec. 4, 1986.
10. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/1665461
11. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/10636817
12. www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9119141
13. www.faqs.org/patents/app/20090081252#ixzz0Yj7RZg0n
14. www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/300aa-22

Photo Credit

Jeffry John Aufderheide

Jeffry John Aufderheide is the father of a child injured as a result of vaccination. As editor of VacTruth.com, he promotes well-educated health professionals, informed consent, and full disclosure and accountability of adverse reactions to vaccines.

[onawah]

Yet another great article on the dangers of vaccines from Dr. Mercola today at:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/02/12/flu-vaccine-propaganda.aspx?e_cid=20130212_DNL_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_campaign=20130212

Of particular interest is the targeting of the new "vaccine schedule"...

Immunization Schedule Guaranteed 'Safe,' IOM Panel Declares

Speaking with WebMD, Dr. H. Cody Meissner, a member of the American Academy of Pediatrics committee was also undoubtedly reading his cue cards when he said:11

"It's so important to adhere to these immunization schedules. People need to understand: These schedules are put together with great care and discussion and review of scientific data... It's critically important to adhere to the schedule..."

Fortunately, parents are slowly but surely waking up to the tragic fact that vaccine damage is real with a capital "R." If each and every dose of every vaccine on the schedule, alone and/or in combination with others, is indeed safe, then show us the research! I want to see the methodologically sound studies using true placebos as controls and conducted by investigators without conflicts of interest with industry or public health agencies for each and every one of those vaccine combinations.

The fact is, there aren't any studies like that. That kind of credible vaccine safety science doesn't exist. So it's no wonder that as many as 21 percent of American parents are now delaying or refusing some or all of the recommended childhood vaccines12 for their children. More and more parents are seeing the very real effects of vaccine damage to children all around them, and they have good reason to exercise caution.

"In response to those fears – or, rather, the quantifiable impact of reduced vaccination that stems from those fears – the Department of Health and Human Services asked the I.O.M. to review all the current scientific evidence13 on the schedule, and to research ways to address parental concerns.

That friendly face on the recommended schedule is still lacking (that's up to individual pediatricians), but... the panel concluded that the current schedule is not only safe, but 'rather than exposing children to harm, following the complete childhood immunization schedule is strongly associated with reducing vaccine-preventable diseases,'" the New York Times reports:14

And, according to a recent NPR report15 on the IOM panel's findings:

"'...some parents still worry that the schedule of vaccinations – 24 immunizations by the age of 2 – can be dangerous. That worry is likely misplaced, according to a yearlong review of all available scientific data. Researchers from the Institute of Medicine found there is no evidence that the federally recommended timeline for childhood vaccines is unsafe.

According to family physician Alfred Berg of the University of Washington School of Medicine, who was a member of the IOM committee, the research team looked at a large number of medical conditions, including 'things like autoimmune diseases, which even captures diabetes, asthma, hypersensitivity, allergies, seizures, epilepsy, child developmental disorders including autism, and other learning disorders, communications disorders, intellectual disabilities, and even rare things like tics or Tourette's syndrome.'

None could be linked to the vaccination schedule. Parents should be reassured, says Berg.

...Even though this review finds that there's no reason to worry and that the current recommended schedule is completely safe, Berg says it still might be useful to know what happens to children who don't get their vaccinations on time – by comparing them to children who do. Preliminary research does show children who don't get vaccinated on time are hospitalized more often than children who are immunized according to federal guidelines."

It would be laughable if it wasn't so darn serious. As Barbara Loe Fisher, president of the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC) has pointed out, the panel relied on fewer than 40 studies, which, she argues, "is not nearly enough science to give parents confidence that the current vaccine schedule is safe."16 Furthermore, to PROMISE that the schedule is "completely safe," as if it comes with an ironclad guarantee, is not only irresponsible, it's completely immoral.

Let me ask you: Who takes the blame and steps in to make things right when your child is harmed by a vaccine? NO ONE. You and you alone are left holding the tattered pieces of your life. As a parent, you are legally and morally responsible to provide for your minor child's health and well being. You are the one left to mourn and cope with what has happened to your child and pay the medical bills, the special tutoring bills and whatever additional expenses you may face after your child is injured by a vaccine or combination of vaccines.

How much is that ironclad guarantee you were promised really worth then?

If all vaccines are "completely safe," when taken alone and together, why did Congress and the U.S. Supreme Court completely shield drug companies selling vaccines in the U.S. from all vaccine injury lawsuits in civil courts when vaccines cause injury and death? Ironically, while the NPR17 reports (above) that children who don't get vaccinated on time are hospitalized more often than those who get their shots according to schedule, the New York Times18 pointed out research demonstrating the complete opposite:

"...But following an alternative vaccination schedule does not appear to present a health risk for an individual child. In fact, a study of under-vaccination published in the journal JAMA Pediatrics19 found that children who were under-vaccinated because of parental choice had lower rates of outpatient and emergency department visits, even among the studied population consisting of children enrolled in and receiving primary care from managed care organizations – in other words, not the children of parents

[Cjay]

It is interesting to note that the MenAfriVac.

Is not listed on the (American) National Vaccine Information Centre listings.

http://medalerts.org/vaersdb/index.php

Wonder why?

This is part of their plan to deceive us and limit adverse information that may reduce sales.

It is common for medicines (and food additives, such as aspartame) to be sold under many different names, especially different names for different countries. Then, if a trial or full-scale vaccination program causes "too many" unwanted side-effects such as death or injury, it is more difficult for people to connect the dots because the vaccine names are different in different countries. Whenever bad events lead to bad press, they simply rename the drug or vaccine or food additive and continue to aggressively sell it.

[4evrneo]

I have been telling people about the dangers in vaccines for years and nobody listens !

I pray for the children most of all because they dont get to make the choice, its made for them by the people who wont educate themselves.

[onawah]

NVIC on Vaccine Tracking
http://www.nvic.org/


Vaccine Tracking & Registry Bills
Threaten Privacy

Legislators in Idaho, Texas and North Dakota have introduced bills either expanding electronic vaccine tracking registries or removing informed consent protections from them in violation of medical privacy. NVIC is actively monitoring vaccine tracking bills and electronically notifying NVIC Advocacy Portal users so they can be put in immediate contact with their own state legislators and voice opposition to the tagging and tracking citizen's vaccination status by government officials without advance voluntary consent.

Involuntary Vaccine Tracking Opposed by NVIC

NVIC has a 15-year public record of opposing forced enrollment of children and adults in electronic medical records and vaccine tracking systems operated by state and federal agencies that track everyone's vaccination status without informed consent, which is a violation of medical privacy.

In the 1990s, NVIC supported the successful efforts of Parents Requesting Open Vaccine Education (PROVE) led by PROVE co-founder and president Dawn Richardson to secure voluntary "opt-in" requirements for the electronic vaccine tracking system operated by the Texas state health department. Dawn is NVIC's national Director of Advocacy and in 2010 created the online vaccine choice empowerment tool, the NVIC Advocacy Portal.

Government Vaccine Mandates & Tracking: Linked in History

Electronic vaccine tracking systems, which enable U.S. federal and state public health officials to tag children with ID numbers and track their vaccination status have been around since the early 1990s.....Click here to read more about vaccine tracking systems in the U.S. and make a comment:
http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/February-2013/Vaccine-Tracking---Registry-Bills-Threaten-Privacy.aspx

[onawah]

More and more vaccine dangers being exposed all the time.
It does my heart good!
Here's the latest from Natural News:

Peanut oil in vaccines behind widespread peanut allergy epidemic

Thursday, February 21, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/039192_peanut_oil_vaccines_allergies.html#ixzz2LVmQknL4


NaturalNews) More than one million children living in America today suffer from peanut allergy, and a significant percentage of these have such severe symptoms that they must carry around self-injectable epinephrine just in case they accidentally become exposed to the food. According to available records; however, virtually nobody had peanut allergy prior to 1900 despite the fact that people have been eating peanuts for ages, which begs the question, why do so many people have peanut allergy today, and from where did this potentially-deadly allergic condition emerge?

In his book The Doctor Within, Dr. Tim O'Shea argues that vaccines are largely responsible for both the advent and increased prevalence of peanut allergy, noting that many vaccines and even antibiotic drugs contain excipients derived from peanut oil. Since it is a relatively inexpensive oil to produce, refined peanut oil became widely adopted as an excipient of choice in the production of vaccines during the 1960s, and it is still widely used today for this purpose.

But peanut oil's role in triggering the peanut allergy epidemic we see today cannot go unstated, as its introduction at the turn of the 20th century eventually caused a sudden and very apparent wave of anaphylaxis, which had never before been seen. Anaphylaxis, of course, is the general term used to denote allergic reactions to food, and can include severe and sometimes violent reactive symptoms, including but not limited to convulsions, seizures, and even death.

The more peanut oil was used in vaccine and drug production, it turns out, the more the population began to suffer from serious food allergy symptoms. Utilizing peanut oil as an excipient was great for the drug and vaccine industries, of course, as it works as an effective preservative and adjuvant for vaccines. But for those who ingest or are injected with it, peanut oil-based excipients and adjuvants can be the precipitator of a very serious and permanent peanut allergy.

"Although peanut allergies became fairly common during the 1980s, it wasn't until the early 1990s when there was a sudden surge of children reacting to peanuts -- the true epidemic appeared," explains Dr. O'Shea in his book, highlighting the fact that the ever-expanding childhood vaccination schedule can be directly correlated with a corresponding rise in peanut allergies. "As vaccines doubled between the 1980s and the 1990s, thousands of kids were not exhibiting peanut sensitivities, with many violent reactions that were sometimes fatal."

Vaccine manufacturers do not have to disclose all vaccine ingredients to consumers
It is important to note that in 1973, when peanut allergies were still relatively rare, a study was conducted on the effects of peanut excipients in vaccines. Not long after it was published; however, government regulators decided that vaccine manufacturers no longer had to label peanut excipients in vaccines, which means pediatricians, parents, and others who wanted to avoid peanut excipients for safety reasons could no longer effectively do so.

"What is listed today in the Physicians Desk Reference in each vaccine section is not the full formula," adds Dr. O'Shea. "Suddenly that detailed information was proprietary: the manufacturers must be protected. They only had to describe the formula in general."

Since that time, peanut allergies have only gotten more prevalent and more severe, and the vast majority of the population has no idea that peanut excipients still used in vaccines are largely responsible. Will this ever change? Only if government regulators and medical authorities suddenly develop consciences will this monumental medical fraud be widely exposed and properly addressed.

Be sure to read Dr. O'Shea's entire chapter on peanut excipients and vaccines here:
http://www.thedoctorwithin.com

You can also read the rest of his book here: http://www.thedoctorwithin.com/chapters/

Sources for this article include:

http://www.thedoctorwithin.com

[ThePythonicCow]

In his book The Doctor Within, Dr. Tim O'Shea argues that vaccines are largely responsible for both the advent and increased prevalence of peanut allergy, noting that many vaccines and even antibiotic drugs contain excipients derived from peanut oil. Since it is a relatively inexpensive oil to produce, refined peanut oil became widely adopted as an excipient of choice in the production of vaccines during the 1960s, and it is still widely used today for this purpose.

But peanut oil's role in triggering the peanut allergy epidemic we see today cannot go unstated, as its introduction at the turn of the 20th century eventually caused a sudden and very apparent wave of anaphylaxis, which had never before been seen. Anaphylaxis, of course, is the general term used to denote allergic reactions to food, and can include severe and sometimes violent reactive symptoms, including but not limited to convulsions, seizures, and even death.


To use a favorite phrase of someone I went to college with, a long time ago ... Christ on a Crutch!

[onawah]

Have a peanut allergy? READ Post # 11!
(I thought this should be bumped to catch the attention of those with this allergy.)
:bump:

[Bo Atkinson]

With countless vaccine posts already, i'll add this here....
Not to multiply the gloom, but rather to hope doctors will wake up, with floods of evidence.


Shingles Goes Epidemic: Chicken Pox Vax to Blame
March 1, 2013

Progression of shingles. A cluster of small bumps (1) turns into blisters (2) that resemble chickenpox lesions. The blisters fill with pus, break open (3), crust over (4), and finally disappear. This process takes four to five weeks. A painful condition called post-herpetic neuralgia can sometimes occur. This condition is thought to be caused by damage to the nerves (5), and can last from weeks to years after the rash disappears. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

Shingles Goes Epidemic: Chicken Pox Vax to Blame

GreenMedInfo, February 28th 2013 at 5:00 am

Written By:

Heidi Stevenson



Read more: http://prn.fm/2013/03/01/shingles-goes-epidemic-chicken-pox-vax-to-blame/#ixzz2MZjG7Dmc
Under Creative Commons License: Attribution

[william r sanford72]

thank you...we fought the school and doctors and dhs... on that battle years ago and barely won..iowa wouldnt even admitt that we had a choice.we refused vaccines and lucky im a hella gardner...i worked on a christian sci. churchs landscape and garden and became friends with some members who seen fit to provide the papaer work needed to make us exempt on religious grounds...we are not chistian sci.....needless to say i never sent them bill for my work from then on. I should add this was over my 3 children and the school system...

[onawah]

More VERY good news on the vaccine front, from the looks of it.
Even if the UN doesn't do its job, it's a good sign this issue is being examined.
Say a prayer!
Read the whole article at:
http://www.bolenreport.com/Mark%20Geier/vaccine%20industry%20panic.htm


Industry In a Panic...

Over Pending UN Removal of Mercury in Vaccine Action...

Opinion by Consumer Advocate Tim Bolen

Monday, December 17th, 2012


Probably one of the most EXPENSIVE Public Relations campaigns in the history of Planet Earth began today when the worldwide vaccine industry makes its final desperate moves to try to stop the United Nations from banning, completely, in a binding treaty, the use of the deadly poison mercury as a preservative (Thimerosal) in vaccines today injected into 96.2% of children worldwide.

If the UN actually does ban the use of Thimerosal, and it certainly should, then it appears that the vaccine industry will completely collapse. There are those of us that think, quite correctly, that, that too, would be a VERY good thing.

The fifth session of the Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to prepare a global legally binding instrument on mercury (INC5) will be held in Geneva, from 13 to 18 January 2013. On the agenda is the removal of Thimerosal (49% mercury) from all medications worldwide - a move that any sane person would approve of.

But that removal is being challenged by the drug industry, an industry best understood by noting the attorneys advertising daily and nightly on television looking for victims of that same industry to represent in court.

More, one only needs to listen, with a shaking head, to drug advertising on television's final words about the drug indicating that your eyes will pop out, your body parts will quit working, you'll have a heart attack, your bones will dissolve, BUT, according to the visual depiction in the ad, you will be very sexually attractive while this is happening.

The screech "Experts say Thimerosal ban would imperil global health efforts" is, I think, just the first foray into the attempt to pressure UN delegates into dropping Thimerosal ban language at the final UN mercury conference.

The drug industry is at a disadvantage in this arena for none of its usual, customary, methods to influence decision makers get any traction with this group. With the US congress, for instance, they merely send in the usual 4,000 leering lobbyists (I am not exaggerating) dripping threats, offers of contributions, etc. to make their point. With doctors, especially pediatricians, they simply, through their cadre of long-legged bouncy-boob ex-cheerleaders, offer exotic trips, lunches for the staff, etc.

But, at the UN, the delegates were made aware at INC2, that when Thimerosal was banned in childhood vaccines in the US, Canada and selected European countries, those mercury-laced, filthy pus tubes were sent to THEIR countries, to be injected into THEIR children. And now, of course, those countries have worse Autism, and other neurological disorders than the US, to deal with.



So, you ask, why wouldn't the drug industry just REMOVE Thimerosal from vaccines?

I know the answer to this question - and so do you. There are two parts:

We are dealing here with an industry that has a continuous history of death and destruction drugs for profit. They know that through one form of bribery or another, that they can pretty much get ANYTHING APPROVED by the US government agencies designated to protect the public. They know that no matter what they do, even if tens of thousands die (Vioxx?) that the penalties imposed on them by those agencies represent only a token percent of their humungous profits on each of those drugs.

(1) The one part of their business that they knew would destroy them if they had to assume full liability for their dangerous products is vaccines. Vaccines are SO BAD, so putrid, untested, preposterous in their claims, death and injury wielding that the drug lords wouldn't even attempt to market them unless they could, somehow, convince Congress to give them immunity to lawsuits over vaccines. They had to be ecstatic when Congress actually did that.

If Thimerosal was removed from vaccines, worldwide, no doubt, neurological issues in new children would nearly vanish for the next generations. The lawsuits against the industry, despite the existing laws, would never end. And, those lawsuits wouldn't just be from individuals - they'd be from whole countries, States, school districts, you-name-it. That would be the very bloody end of the entire pharmaceutical industry - probably forever.

(2) It wouldn't surprise anyone if it were suggested that, perhaps, mercury was intentionally introduced into vaccines to cause behavioral symptoms, etc. that could, and would, be treated by other drugs?

Drugs like Risperdal, for instance, which, we all know, due to the lawsuits, is problematic. More, there is a whole list found here, none of which, by the way, are "Approved" for Autism, used for vaccine-damage cleanup. And, the drug lords are rolling in money. Bathing in money. At our children's expense.



I have to hand it to the Geiers and their friends...

In short, it is THEY who have driven the vaccine industry to desperation. Last May of 2011 I wrote:

Who are these Geier guys?

In short, they are the nemesis of the world-wide vaccine industry.

(1) Last January 27th, 28th, 29th, 2011 the Geiers, along with their colleague Lisa Sykes attended, by invitation as an official NGO, the United Nations Environment Programme - Intergovernmental Negotiating Committee to prepare a global legally binding instrument on Mercury (INC2). There, they officially presented, to the shocked international delegates, convincing evidence that mercury in vaccines, HAS NOT actually been removed, and represents a serious threat to the people of Planet Earth. The Geiers have since been invited to present again at the next conference in Nairobi, Kenya, in October, 2011.

(2) The Geiers have been a mainstay in the State legislative actions banning Thimerosal in vaccines across the US, and the world. More than half of the States are involved in Thimerosal ban legislation. Already, New York, Delaware, Iowa, Missouri, Illinois, California, and Washington state have legislated those bans.

(3) The Geiers, through their non-profit corporation CoMeD recently sued the FDA for, as attorney Bob Reeves say "The failure of the FDA to follow their own regulations and require testing for the safety of vaccines."

(4) Press Releases - the Geiers, through their organizations, have issued Press Releases documenting mercury in vaccine issues. There are five of them. You can read them by clicking on each one: One, Two, Three, Four, Five.

(5) Their peer reviewed studies, over a hundred, cover a broad range of Thimerosal caused issues including two extremely shocking revelations: (a) Thimerosal in vaccines is 300 times more toxic to the human brain than the bacteria in the vaccines it is designed to destroy, (b) there is a Thimerosal substitute that is twenty times more destructive to bacteria and it has NO affect on the human brain. You can find many of these published papers here.

(6) Mark Geier MD testifies in Vaccine Court on behalf of brain damaged children. Article.

(7) Both Geiers testified to the IOM on the problems of Thimerosal in vaccines. Testimony.

(8) Both Geiers have been active attempting to force the US Center for Disease Control (CDC) to make vaccine adverse reaction data available to the public. The CDC will NOT let anyone see that data. Do you wonder why? Link.

(9) David Geier was appointed by the Governor of Maryland to the Maryland Commission on Autism, and as such, has significantly effected the quality of treatment recommendations offered to Autistic children in the State of Maryland.

(10) Mark and David Geier, because of their research into the question "Why do boys get Autism at a rate higher than girls," found that Thimerosal interacts with testosterone, increasing it in children, causing "precocious puberty." They then found that the use of the drug Lupron reduces those effects, and significantly reduces incidents of violence, and acting-out, in Autistic children, sometimes almost removing Autistic behavior.

(11) The Geiers set up, with every health insurance company in the US, pre-approved protocols, using Labcorp testing, for the use of Lupron, and the payment for that testing and that drug, directly to the lab and pharmacies on a case-by-case basis.

The Geiers, because of their activities, are a MAJOR thorn in the side of the vaccine industry.

Major...

[onawah]

A new study in journal Pediatrics shows parents are wising up to vaccine scams.

[QUOTE]Vaccine victory: Widespread resistance from parents to HPV jab for daughters shows truth is spreading far and wide

Monday, March 25, 2013 by: Jonathan Benson, staff writer

http://www.naturalnews.com/039634_HPV_vaccines_resistance_victory.html

(NaturalNews) Parents with young daughters are increasingly wising up to the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccine scam, according to a new study published in the journal Pediatrics. Based on the latest figures, more than 16 percent of parents in 2010 rejected popular HPV vaccines like Gardasil and Cervarix for their daughters citing major safety concerns, this compared to just 4.5 percent of parents in 2008.

The study, which was put together by a team of researchers from major institutions across the U.S., evaluates current vaccination trends with regards to the various reasons why some parents do not vaccinate their children. After carefully evaluating data compiled as part of the 2010 National Immunization Survey of Teens, the research team learned that parents are increasingly rejecting the HPV vaccine, and specifically for reasons of safety more than anything else.

"Despite doctors increasingly recommending adolescent vaccines, parents increasingly intend not to vaccinate female teens with HPV," explains the study's conclusion. "The concern about safety of HPV grew with each year."

In years past, many parents who objected to HPV vaccines for their daughters cited various other reasons such as a lack of need due to their daughters not being sexually active, or just a lack of need for no particular reason at all. But over the course of just two years, the number of parents who objected due to safety concerns jumped by nearly 400 percent, illustrating that parents are catching on to the truth about this deadly vaccine.

Gardasil can cause many deadly side effects, despite the lies of the mainstream media
The study's authors, and many parroting mainstream media sources, are of course lamenting this drop in public participation in the HPV vaccine scam. Ridiculous news outlets like Slate.com, for instance, are now actively promoting lies in response to the study's findings, claiming that HPV vaccines have never been linked to causing any serious side effects, and that parents are rejecting it for mysterious and invalidated reasons.

But Natural News readers know better, as Gardasil alone has been linked to causing serious side effects in tens of thousands of young girls from all across the globe, and death in more than 130 others, according to the latest data compiled by SaneVax, Inc. And since these are only the reported number of adverse events, the actual number of serious injuries and deaths caused by HPV vaccines is likely far higher.

As we have previously reported on many occasions, the Gardasil vaccine is loaded with a toxic stew of deadly chemical adjuvants, genetically-modified (GM) DNA fragments, and other harmful additives known to cause neurological damage, paralysis, and death. The vaccine itself has also never even been shown to provide any legitimate protection against cervical cancer for girls or anyone else.

Be sure to check out this 22-minute interview with Dr. Russell Blaylock about the criminal fraud of Gardasil and other HPV vaccines: http://www.naturalnews.com

Also, Cynthia A. Janak from RenewAmerica has written an excellent article entitled The great Gardasil vaccine cover-up: http://www.renewamerica.com/columns/janak/070227

Sources for this article include:

http://pediatrics.aappublications.org

http://www.npr.org

http://www.naturalnews.com/Gardasil.html

[DNA]

I have been telling people about the dangers in vaccines for years and nobody listens !

I pray for the children most of all because they dont get to make the choice, its made for them by the people who wont educate themselves.

Some of these folks get quite belligerant as well, I've had folks tell me "you should be jailed for not vaccinating your child". It's a touchy topic, and folks are not ready to entertain the notion that they have been duped into harming their children.
I can understand that, I really can.

[onawah]

Dr. Wakefield Film 'Hear the Silence' Resurfaces After 10 Years

rT-2S7L-N9c

From:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/26/dr-wakefield-vaccine-film.aspx?e_cid=20130326_DNL_art_2&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&
utm_content=art2&utm_campaign=20130326


By Dr. Mercola

The video above, “Hear the Silence,” first aired on British television in 2003, then disappeared for nearly a decade before recently resurfacing on YouTube.

It tells the story of British gastroenterologist Dr. Andrew Wakefield, whose 1998 research published in The Lancet suggested there may be a link between the MMR vaccine, chronic bowel disease and autism.

Ever since the article's publication, it has remained one of the most cited yet most controversial studies on the topic of vaccine safety. The film provides a moving portrayal of Dr. Wakefield’s research and a mother’s journey in trying to find out the truth about what caused her child’s autism.

Is Dr. Wakefield a Fraud?

If you’ve followed Dr. Wakefield’s story at all, this may be one of the first questions that comes to your mind – especially if you’ve been following the story on mainstream media.

Dr. Wakefield's 1998 study involved a retrospective case series analysis, which essentially reviews the clinical histories of a group of patients with a constellation of signs and symptoms that link them together and create a recurring pattern.

In this case, it was a group of autistic children with gastrointestinal problems, which led to the discovery of a novel bowel disease that Wakefield and his colleagues at the Royal Free Hospital in London first described.

But the clinical story didn't end with bowel disease; it also included symptoms of regressive autism after receiving the MMR (measles, mumps and rubella) vaccine... and many began to question the safety of the vaccine after this news was made public.

So rather than celebrating the discovery of a tangible, treatable and potentially preventable serious health problem that could help those suffering with similar health issues, Wakefield's discovery became a hotly debated controversy in which Dr. Wakefield's personal and professional reputation was badly smeared.

No Fraud Committed in Wakefield Study

At the heart of the Wakefield controversy has been whether or not the children in the study were, in fact, diagnosed with non-specific colitis, or if that information had been fabricated -- allegations that were largely initiated by investigative journalist Brian Deer, just months after “Hear the Silence” originally aired.1

Over the course of a 15-year nightmare journey, Dr. Wakefield lost his career and his medical license, which culminated in a series of articles published by the BMJ in January 20112 alleging that he falsified data, rendering the original Lancet article fraudulent.

But later that year, research microbiologist David Lewis of the National Whistleblowers Center explained that he reviewed histopathological grading sheets by two of Dr. Wakefield's coauthors, pathologists Amar Dhillon and Andrew Anthony, and concluded there was no fraud committed.3

It’s interesting to note, too, that in the years following his 1998 finding Dr. Wakefield published another 19 papers on the vaccine-induced bowel disorder. All were peer reviewed, and none have been retracted. However, none of these 19 papers are ever discussed in the media. In an interview I conducted with Dr. Wakefield in 2010, it’s revealed that numerous other studies also support Dr. Wakefield's controversial 1998 findings.


read the rest of the article here:
http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/03/26/dr-wakefield-vaccine-film.aspx?e_cid=20130326_DNL_art_2&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art2&utm_campaign=20130326