Movie: "Operation Terror" - has anyone seen this?

[Dennis Leahy]

Operation Terror
"The 9/11 Story You Are Not Supposed To Know"


Has anyone seen this movie yet? If so, what is the "secret weapon" they mention in the trailer, mini-neutron bombs, or a directed energy weapon, ... or something else?

Is the movie good? Is it worth paying $20 to buy a copy?



http://vimeo.com/34150493


Source: http://vimeo.com/34150493 -or- http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR1RaU9mpHQ
(http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nR1RaU9mpHQ)


The movie's website is http://www.operationterror.com/
(http://www.operationterror.com/)
Dennis

[Snookie]

Sounds like the movie is claiming it was the CIA who was responsible. Maybe a bit closer to the real story, and one a lot of people will believe....close, but no cigar!

[Dennis Leahy]

Sounds like the movie is claiming it was the CIA who was responsible. Maybe a bit closer to the real story, and one a lot of people will believe....close, but no cigar!Thanks, Snookie,

Well, at the beginning of the trailer, it shows what appears to be either an oil baron or a PNAC guy talking about the Caspian area oil they want - and they mention the PNAC phrase "new Pearl Harbor." So, it doesn't appear that they are stating that the CIA came up with the initial idea. If the Mossad/Zionists are not named, then this writer/director may be deliberately producing disinformation (by not naming the true instigators of the plan, or by making it strictly about oil, which is not true) or may believe that himself.

That's why I'm hoping some of the folks here who have done some deep 9/11 research can comment on the movie - to see if it is worth watching or not.

Dennis

[modwiz]

Whether it was any of the alphabet agencies, including the Hebrew alphabet, LOL, the current administration or the the preceding one, there is probably equal culpability all around. I don't care if the plans were written in Tel Aviv, and I don't know where they were, I know they were OK'd in D.C. So, we have a number of groups, who should be fed to sharks, each pointing a finger at the other hoping to get the other guy to have to walk the plank. This is the behavior of psychopaths, scoundrels and cowards. The types who usually find their way to positions of too much influence. They are also hoping we will argue over the details instead of just realizing the DNA in a cesspool doesn't matter. It's all sh!t.

[Snookie]

Sounds like the movie is claiming it was the CIA who was responsible. Maybe a bit closer to the real story, and one a lot of people will believe....close, but no cigar!Thanks, Snookie,

Well, at the beginning of the trailer, it shows what appears to be either an oil baron or a PNAC guy talking about the Caspian area oil they want - and they mention the PNAC phrase "new Pearl Harbor." So, it doesn't appear that they are stating that the CIA came up with the initial idea. If the Mossad/Zionists are not named, then this writer/director may be deliberately producing disinformation (by not naming the true instigators of the plan, or by making it strictly about oil, which is not true) or may believe that himself.

That's why I'm hoping some of the folks here who have done some deep 9/11 research can comment on the movie - to see if it is worth watching or not.

Dennis

Hi Dennis, my comment was made partly because of the comment at the bottom of the YT post:

"A fictionalized account of CIA agents carrying out a plan to attack the World Trade Center and the pentagon and put the blame on muslim terrorists.
learn more: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2040454/
dude,this movie is pretty ****ed up!"

Also because the movie trailer showed the CIA logo on the floor, which would lead one to assume that the characters planning the operation were CIA operatives. I may need to watch it again to be sure.

[Lefty Dave]

Greetings fellow questioners...
It feels a bit like disinformation to me...but it's just a trailer, ....to my way of thinking 9-11 was a series of crimes...or the cover-up of crimes... first the hidious assault and murder of all those people, the insurance that paid off without investigation, a couple guys turning a few million into a few billion!...the pentagon saying it can't find 2 trillion dollars, then get's hit right where the people who are looking for it...the gold that allegedly disappeared, the stock market manipulations that day that were never investigated...the bonds that came due and were cleverly cleared under 'emergency circumstances', ...the enron and Worldcom evidence that disappeared in bldg 7...the evidence of that day being removed so fast, doesn't anyone else smell something 'fishy' ??? Maybe the movie touches on these anomalies, I don't know. Thanks for the heads-up, though, it will be good to watch...even just to learn what ""they"" want you to believe... blessings.

[norman]

THEY'VE DONE THE FIGURES AND SEE THAT OVER 80% !


of the general public believe 9/11 was an inside job.

That's grounds for going hot with 'inside job' movies until they can reclaim the 'solid ground' about the matter and take full editorial control over it again.

Job Done !...... X

:wacko:

[Lefty Dave]

I think you're right, norman...

[Operator]

FWIW: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt2040454/

On imdb it is rated 8.4 ... that's a pretty good score

[Curt]

THEY'VE DONE THE FIGURES AND SEE THAT OVER 80% !


of the general public believe 9/11 was an inside job.

That's grounds for going hot with 'inside job' movies until they can reclaim the 'solid ground' about the matter and take full editorial control over it again.

Job Done !...... X

:wacko:

This has the ring of truth to me. :) Well put, sir.

[Dennis Leahy]

Thanks, Operator. The comments made at the IMDB site give a hint of the question brought up by Snookie:
"The whole operation is done as a top secret project started at the direction of an elite member of "The Council" (conspiracy buffs will immediately recognize who they are) and coordinated by a small team of CIA agents assigned the job. "The lines in the trailers: "...we are going to develop a highly unconventional weapon..." and "...we've developed a weapon that cannot be used against any of our enemies..." tells me that the movie supports the Judy Wood directed energy weapon theory. Therefore, to me, (someone that does not believe that a directed energy weapon was used - when slow-motion video evidence shows explosion after explosion occurring down the towers), if the movie is "limited hangout" then it is limited hangout by offering the unprovable explanation while ignoring the explainable (mini-neutron bombs.)

Even so, this movie may be a useful tool for our side, to at least inject the meme of "inside job", using a fictional story and actors. I suspect that a lot of people that cannot break down cognitive dissonance based on facts can still have a meme shoved sideways into their head using this movie. (Is there such a thing as "positive propaganda?")

I decided to buy a copy. I'll review it in a week or two from now.

Dennis