PDA

View Full Version : UFO FINALLY!! 2010 100% UFO PROOF, Day time footage UFO Craft



irishspirit
12th September 2010, 18:06
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUpwDFWSkaU&feature=player_embedded

Fredkc
12th September 2010, 18:15
Cut it OUT, Irish!!

You had every dog in my house barking, when I ran this. And... this got the neighbor's dog started as well.

Couldn't you find proof that didn't involve stirring up the whole neighborhood on a Sunday morning?

Cheerz ;)
Fred

irishspirit
12th September 2010, 18:17
lol Fred,

that is a very good video in my view.

Interesting times ahead, videos are popping up more and more, with good evidence.

Kra
12th September 2010, 18:58
Another misleading thread title.

irishspirit
12th September 2010, 19:00
Another misleading thread title.

Kra, I copied and pasted the title. Nothing misleading on my part, I can assure you.

Kra
12th September 2010, 19:05
Kra, I copied and pasted the title. Nothing misleading on my part, I can assure you.

You can always give a thread title that you feel is right... that matches what we will read or see.

irishspirit
12th September 2010, 19:09
for you Kra, I will do that.

Carmody
12th September 2010, 19:21
Not conclusive enough.

That could be a simple RC roto craft gussied up with lights.

Helvetic
12th September 2010, 22:04
This video was discussed on the openminds forum back in January 2010.

Open Minds Forum Re: UFO Video thread (http://lucianarchy.proboards.com/index.cgi?board=uforeports&action=display&thread=2404&page=45)

Original post by Marvin

Crosspost:

Its fake:

http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff290/instantmartians/FakeUFO.jpg

Do you see it?

A closer look:

http://i240.photobucket.com/albums/ff290/instantmartians/FakeUFO-1.gif

It is suspended. Now go back and watch the video again (you will wonder how you missed it).

Lost Soul
12th September 2010, 22:08
Anybody know morse code?

olgraybear
13th September 2010, 01:47
I have a hard time with this one too. Object looks suspended and listen to the barking dog. It too is out of place. The entire barking sequence is repeated twice. Listen carefully.

onawah
13th September 2010, 01:53
No, I don't know Morse code, but here are a couple of clips that look pretty real, though it's hard to tell these days with Photoshop, etc. .
This first one, a sort of gumdrop shape, looks like the one on the Bodhghaya Event thread...

UFO videos shock England, real ufo - Watch it leave almost instantaneously
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCaGrLQGmUQ

Fishermen capture military jets chasing UFO into Sea in Spain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cvafowzp2s

Watch the key part of the above footage in slow motion :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gjhx3jxiNxY

We've heard about the UFOs that discharge smaller ships, and UFOs that appear to divide into one or more separate ships. Also, apparently, the gumdrop shaped ships have been cited elsewhere. It looked a bit dodgy at the end when it suddenly veered off to the left, but I've never seen any other clips of that happening so close up, so I'm not sure how that would actually look.

Jnana
13th September 2010, 06:07
UFO videos shock England, real ufo - Watch it leave almost instantaneously
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wCaGrLQGmUQ

Fishermen capture military jets chasing UFO into Sea in Spain
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2cvafowzp2s

Watch the key part of the above footage in slow motion :
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Gjhx3jxiNxY

The first one of these three looks CG to me, but I have no other information to back that up.

The last two are part of a trailer for a movie: Spain UFO footage was movie production (http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=AttS1VSMEp0)
This is probably the third time I've had to point this out, this one just won't die!

Video footage will never be "proof". At best, it's evidence. Unless you personally know the person who shot the video and the circumstances under which it was done, any video is suspect. I have my own video footage of unusual things (light in the sky type stuff), and even my wife says it wouldn't mean much to her if she didn't know me, the circumstances, the equipment, etc. In addition, she has seen similar things with her own eyes.

theguardian
13th September 2010, 07:25
Just Fake.

irishspirit
13th September 2010, 15:30
I have not seen this video before, and do not use other forums. Si, I will have missed that discussion. If it has been proven fake, I am happy with that.

However, it has opened up a discussion on it!" Thanks for clearing this up!

freespirit
13th September 2010, 15:49
In my view it's only a matter of time before some one with a decent camera and some understanding of how to use it will film something that can't be de-bunked

Jnana
13th September 2010, 21:54
In my view it's only a matter of time before some one with a decent camera and some understanding of how to use it will film something that can't be de-bunked

Debunking has nothing to do with reality. It has to do with creating doubt. Anything can be debunked. If they encounter problems attacking the evidence, they start attacking the character of the person who delivered it - even if they have to make stuff up.

Rimbaud
13th September 2010, 22:02
It looks very similar to things that I see over the mountains where I live.. they're further away towards Mont Perdus..but the "blinking light" is very familiar. I personally wouldn't write this one off just yet.

Rimbaud

HORIZONS
13th September 2010, 22:53
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

Rimbaud
13th September 2010, 22:58
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

Maybe a simple light is just the best way to "see" things...As an ex Army guy..nightlight was no replacement for day light...Just an observation...But I have seen these "Strobe effect" craft before..I have no idea what they are.

Rimbaud

Lucrum
14th September 2010, 11:19
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

If I were to elaborate on this, I'd not say lights would strictly be a human thing...that's a little bit too general in my opinion.
However, it is a huge tactical disadvantage to fly around in a vessel that blinks like crazy. To me it makes no sense that alien beings, trying to conceal their presence for whatever reason, suddenly roams around in a ship that is a dead give-away like that.
The only reason for behaviour like this that I could come up with, is that these beings in that case do not see us as a threat of any kind. Sadly this can be contradicted by the very fact that knowledge of such presence isn't a public truth and thus giving those said beings no reason to give away their position like that.

We use lights to inform of our presence, likewise do we utilize the absence of light in the opposite scenario.

I can find logic in existence of other alien races, and maybe also that they are present here as we speak...but it makes no sense to me that they would fit their ships as a flying lightshow. :)

Eric J (Viking)
14th September 2010, 11:26
Slightly off topic....another UFO in China!! What's going on in China???

*****

THE appearance of an unidentified flying object had forced an airport in Baotou in Inner Mongolia to delay the landing of three planes by nearly an hour on Saturday night.

The UFO, the third reported in China so far this year, was seen hovering about four kilometers east of the Baotou airport at 8pm, the online news portal Dbw.cn reported today.

Airport officials immediately called off the landing of three flights from Shanghai and Beijing at 9:14pm out of safety concerns. Another two planes were ordered to land in neighboring Ordos Airport and Taiyuan Airport.

The airport operation went back to normal by 10pm, the report said. But officials gave no further details about the object.

Read more: http://www.shanghaidaily.com/article/?id=449133&type=National#ixzz0zVCLyqLK

viking

Celine
14th September 2010, 12:18
Another misleading thread title.

i second this opinion


And i ask that the thread title be changed ...

No offense meant to you Irish.

i respect your intent.

freespirit
14th September 2010, 12:51
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

Allegedly these craft create intense electromagnetic fields which in turn ionize the air around, giving the impression of light.

jaybee
14th September 2010, 14:06
Allegedly these craft create intense electromagnetic fields which in turn ionize the air around, giving the impression of light.


What do you think about this, freespirit (and everyone)....what you said above made me
think of my UFO photo....taken August 2009...from Alton Barnes, Wiltshire...in the direction
of Salisbury Plain...


Full pic....you can hardly see the helicopter, but it is there....


http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/beeejay/nexus%20avebury/crop%20circles%20August%2009/helicopter%20anomaly/P1000825-2.jpg



zoom in on the black blob....circled...



http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/beeejay/nexus%20avebury/crop%20circles%20August%2009/helicopter%20anomaly/P1000905.jpg




further zoom....with contrast (photobucket effects)




http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/beeejay/nexus%20avebury/crop%20circles%20August%2009/helicopter%20anomaly/P1000906-1.jpg



besides the obvious light on the left....there are 4 roundish ones at the bottom
and 2 at the top....




with ink-stamp effect on Photobucket...you can see slight indentations on the
top and bottom...where the 'light' blobs are...




http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/beeejay/nexus%20avebury/crop%20circles%20August%2009/helicopter%20anomaly/P1000906-1-1.jpg

HORIZONS
14th September 2010, 18:00
Allegedly these craft create intense electromagnetic fields which in turn ionize the air around, giving the impression of light.

Now that makes sense to me - thanks for your perspective.

HORIZONS
14th September 2010, 18:10
jaybee, That is a very interesting photo you have there. One of the better one's I have seen.

To me - other than the reason stated by freespirit - external lighting indicates a "man made" object, as I don't think an off world UFO would need a headlight to see where it is going - nor would it need identification flashing lighting-for port and starboard. But an energy signature I can understand.

Jnana
14th September 2010, 18:12
The lights I've seen are used for signaling - us. When a craft is close enough so that the light is more than a point source, it has a distinct quality unlike any aircraft lighting I've seen. The disc of light is pure in color (typically white), has constant luminance across the surface of the disc, and absolutely no glare. I've seen such lights a number of times, once was only about three hundred yards away, as determined by a row of trees, and another was a vertical (high to low) stripe of light made under low solid overcast. There are other times as well.

I think it's pretty silly to conclude that ETs would have no use for lights on their craft. Lights have many practical purposes, like, oh, seeing stuff and signalling.

HORIZONS
14th September 2010, 18:49
I am speaking more of the flashing glittering lights we see in UFO photo's and vids. For signaling I could see it, but for seeing where to go??? We (Air Force, MIC, etc) have technology that can see, fly and bomb targets without the need for windows nor lighting. I imagine that an advanced technology has even much better tech than that to see things with. I need a flashlight to see in the dark, but I doubt an ET would. LOL! :p

Jnana
14th September 2010, 19:21
I am speaking more of the flashing glittering lights we see in UFO photo's and vids. For signaling I could see it, but for seeing where to go??? We (Air Force, MIC, etc) have technology that can see, fly and bomb targets without the need for windows nor lighting. I imagine that an advanced technology has even much better tech than that to see things with. I need a flashlight to see in the dark, but I doubt an ET would. LOL! :p

I said "seeing stuff", not "seeing where to go". You made that leap of interpretation yourself. There are many reports from people who have been on board ET craft and the majority describe them is brightly lit. Just because one has other means to see in the dark does not mean that is always used. Lights are a simple solution to a simple problem.

I agree that the frantically flashing lights in many videos are unconvincing.

There is one type of craft that has been described by a number of independent sources, including one close to where I live, that has a band of multi-colored lights around the rim. I have no idea what those are for. Perhaps aesthetic reasons? It's fun to speculate about these things.

jaybee
14th September 2010, 19:30
jaybee, That is a very interesting photo you have there. One of the better one's I have seen.

To me - other than the reason stated by freespirit - external lighting indicates a "man made" object, as I don't think an off world UFO would need a headlight to see where it is going - nor would it need identification flashing lighting-for port and starboard. But an energy signature I can understand.


:thumb:


Thanks for your thoughts....


This is the same 'UFO' with different contrast/brightness...you can't see the 'light' blobs
top or bottom now....but the 'light' on the left seems to be concentrated and a bit away
from the main bit. I feel it is travelling towards the right??? Not sure...



http://i779.photobucket.com/albums/yy78/beeejay/nexus%20avebury/crop%20circles%20August%2009/helicopter%20anomaly/P1000906-2.jpg

HORIZONS
14th September 2010, 19:35
I said "seeing stuff", not "seeing where to go". You made that leap of interpretation yourself. There are many reports from people who have been on board ET craft and the majority describe them is brightly lit. Just because one has other means to see in the dark does not mean that is always used. Lights are a simple solution to a simple problem.

I agree that the frantically flashing lights in many videos are unconvincing.

There is one type of craft that has been described by a number of independent sources, including one close to where I live, that has a band of multi-colored lights around the rim. I have no idea what those are for. Perhaps aesthetic reasons? It's fun to speculate about these things.

Sorry about that "leap of interpretation" (nice one), and I have seen some cool low riders that have that same cool looking "band of multi-colored lights around the" car thing going on. I wonder who got what from whom? Ha ha... :heh: :alien: I do like that flying disc you have in your avatar - no lights I see. ;)

Mayan2012
30th January 2011, 02:16
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cUpwDFWSkaU&feature=player_embedded

Very interesting. Did you take this video?

ronbono57
30th January 2011, 03:11
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

Probably to amaze the humans and they do a good job of it.

str8thinker
30th January 2011, 03:36
I agree it's a UFO - Unidentified Flying Object. That doesn't mean it's a flying saucer using antigravity, or an alien spaceship manned by ETs. Why couldn't it be a RC (radio-controlled) drone? BTW, I couldn't see a wire suspending it. But it didn't turn or speed off. The video is unsatisfactory, so I'll just ignore it till a better one comes along. Thanks anyway.

By comparison, the UFO over the Temple Mount (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?12814-UFO-Dome-of-the-rock-Temple-mount-Jerusalem-28.01.2011) looks far more convincing.

Rosco1
30th January 2011, 03:42
Here are some daylight sightings I have had over the past three years.

What I have also noticed is that everytime a military aircraft passes over, there is always a ufo in the vicinity and yet when a civilian aircraft goes over, there is never one! That seems rather odd!

LM-R
30th January 2011, 05:48
The lights can mean a lot of things.

For example David Sereda's theories are that UFO's work by de-materializing to light so that way they become weightless and can travel the speed of light and beyond.

physicistatwork
31st January 2011, 22:15
I have a question: Why would a UFO - which is supposed to be a higher technological advanced civilization - need a "light" on their ship for traversing the galaxy?
I mean we need them for identification of our airships, but a UFO? Come on, what the heck, like an advanced space craft would need lights. That is a major flaw to me when I see UFO footage. Lights are a human, of this world, kind of thing. Red lights flashing, or any lights flashing, are something you see in the movies or in fake footage, I can't see the need in extraterrestrial space craft. But maybe that is just me. :confused:

A light is in many instances not just an illuminating device; it is often a consequence of some energy conversion. So I don't find it surprising that UFO's show luminosity, or even specifically localised light emission which may simply be due do probes in the form of lasers or some other technology!

physicistatwork
31st January 2011, 22:23
What do we know about their own knowledge of our inner perceptions? Do we know exactly how a bee or a cat sees the world about them? A lot of the "invisible" light to us is visible to other beings and vice-versa.

modwiz
31st January 2011, 22:43
Probably to amaze the humans and they do a good job of it.

Ever see the lights on deep sea fish? Lights are not only human.

bilko
31st January 2011, 22:56
I noticed the lights were flashing red, green and blue. It occurred to me that they might be synchronizing with our spectrum.
Maybe they see differently than us or live in a different sort of light spectrum.

jimbojp
3rd February 2011, 01:52
I saw a lot of these in the South East of England last summer, red and blue blinking lights...
Thanks ;)
Jim

kooky
3rd February 2011, 02:18
It does look quite convincing.