sigma6
23rd January 2013, 22:17
GEOMETRY APPEARS WHEN THE SUN'S ORBIT IS SMOOTHED OUT INTO A CIRCLE
If that isn't cool in and of itself then he goes on to show this same principle applies on the planetary scale in the relationship between planetary distance which can be calculated with 99.9 percent accuracy to predict these same proportions. This 'pattern' expresses itself on the atomic level all the way up to the solar system and beyond!. The guy who 'discovered' this relationship in 1987 (a Dr Robert Moon?) a scientist that worked on the Manhatten project.
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1099-2012romancereality
I am really starting to think there really is something to David's interpretation of Ra's expression that all is one. It shows up everywhere and also happens to be the fundamental conclusion of quantum physics, according to quantum physicist and creator of one of the competing string theories, Dr John Hagelin.
David Wilcock has a wicked page that talks about the relationship between the five "platonic solids" i.e universal geometric shapes that I think Hoagland and Drunvalo et al talk about (hyperdimensional physics) These shapes explain the relationship of how atoms arrange their protons, etc, The same pattern can be shown when projecting frequencies on sand particles on a flat surface or muddy water, which I am sure many have seen.
On the other hand this sounds like the ancient knowledge hidden by the secret societies. The same buggers who write our dictionaries and create our legal systems and influence our educations system etc ad nauseum (...another story, but [rant] it still bothers me, because I as research more, it is so obvious how they have created ways to specifically confuse and mislead us... ie. my latest research is on how the word "own" and "ownership" has so many different meanings that I can no longer use it in good conscience any more until I can learn how to qualify what I am saying! And there is no doubt in my mind that when you use one word when we should be using 10 different words, someone is keeping us 'down' !! That is right out of 1984! [end rant]) ie. I think this knowledge HAD TO HAVE BEEN KNOWN before a Dr Robert Moon "discovered" it. It is just reaching a point where there are so many converging sciences they can't "fake it away" anymore...
Anyhoo... if that isn't enough it also talks about how the Mayan calendar number of 260 is used because it is the smallest possible number that is literally the smallest common denominator of all the cycles that are created from it all the way up to the 25,920 year cycle. In other words, it appears the whole universe really does run like one big giant clock... when you combine that with stuff like Prof James Gates and his discovery of what appears to mathematical equations which can only be described as being the equivalent of error checking codes used in computer programming (!) (http://www.transcend.ws/has-james-gates-discovered-computer-code-in-string-theory-equations-welcome-to-the-matrix/) that he discovered while analyzing super-string theory...
The evidence keeps mounting... intelligent design doesn't have to be the mickey mouse metaphorical cartoon version spoon fed to the masses. Although it may very well be alluding to something far more complex (which it is) And I should qualify that, the bible itself is not a simple text by any means. But everywhere we look is, has to be, when you really think about it.... is indication and evidence of super complex, and intricate as can be, intelligent design! going back to Max Planck over a 100 years ago, back to Eastern Philosophy, etc, etc, as far back as the human mind can peer into 'human' history...
I just can't help myself when I see all this coming together... look at all the sciences fitting together to create this beautiful picture; ancient history, astronomy, quantum physics, sacred geometry, computer science, string theory... and people want to listen to monkeys like Richard Dawkins pointing to pictures on a chart with humans in the same categories as chimps and gorillas, yet for all his supposed brilliance he hasn't discovered the existence of the 4 species of big foots, 150,000 collected footprints, centuries of folklore, actual captures in North America, Russia and thousands more anecdotes from people all over the world? (you smell something?) Credit to Lloyd Pye, he is the MAN.
He's (Richard) is playing the same role Piers Morgan is for the MSM on gun control! He's a hatchet man to slow down true social progress, And dont' forget there is a clear agenda for the legal community to label us as "animals" Consider that according to Alfred Adask part of the 'Legal System's' interpretation of "man" is "man and other animals" gramatically stating unequivocally that they are CLEARLY inferring man IS in the category of animal.
This in direct contradiction to the bible and all spiritual and metaphysical literature. Whether you realize it or not, the legal implications of that are DANGEROUS and DIABOLICAL. WE ARE MORE THEN ANIMALS, our physicality is NOT what defines us. (and notice how both of these 'hatchetmen' are oh so 'suave' and 'sophisticated' speakers? almost like they were handpicked for the job!.. weird eh?)
and I ramble...
Anyhow check this out, this whole page is a few weeks of study+ in itself.... it is just so bloody brilliant to see all these disciplines dovetail intricacy upon intricacy...
This all ties into our consciousness. What I like to call our "proof of receipt" that we have an "interest" in this cosmos... there's no time like the present.
The point is, in another interpretation, the legal system IS trying to reflect that... everything is all part of one larger collective or entity, look at the system - city - state - country - commonwealth - queen as defender of the the faith - beholden to the Vatican - vicar of Christ - right up to the big guy himself and the final "OWNER" being 'GOD'. To me this is trying to reflect the outer reality that WE don't own anything, we're just passing through folks, and we have the right of use (beneficial ownership) but we didn't come here with anything and we aren't taking anything with us when we go, so who are we kidding while we're here? All is one, and we are all part of it. Anyhow this last part isn't in there that is my mind seeing more parallels... more evidence of hidden meaning.
And as I study how the government set up all property to be held in the state through the control of titles (NAMES) by which everything else in turn is registered under. For example I will now read a part of the definition of "municipality" out of the CC "... includes the corporation of a city, town, village... blah, blah... or local division of a province (or state), the inhabitants of which are incorporated or are entitled to hold property collectively for a public purpose. " (this wasn't the case pre-1933, but follows a St Germain ascended master's famous communication to the elites of the world in 1887 on how all wealth should be managed.
Ok, going to let my brain cool off...
haha... another update: quote from Conk's signature:
"The quantum field responds not to what we want; but to who we are being."
- Dr. Joe Dispenza"
If that isn't cool in and of itself then he goes on to show this same principle applies on the planetary scale in the relationship between planetary distance which can be calculated with 99.9 percent accuracy to predict these same proportions. This 'pattern' expresses itself on the atomic level all the way up to the solar system and beyond!. The guy who 'discovered' this relationship in 1987 (a Dr Robert Moon?) a scientist that worked on the Manhatten project.
http://divinecosmos.com/start-here/davids-blog/1099-2012romancereality
I am really starting to think there really is something to David's interpretation of Ra's expression that all is one. It shows up everywhere and also happens to be the fundamental conclusion of quantum physics, according to quantum physicist and creator of one of the competing string theories, Dr John Hagelin.
David Wilcock has a wicked page that talks about the relationship between the five "platonic solids" i.e universal geometric shapes that I think Hoagland and Drunvalo et al talk about (hyperdimensional physics) These shapes explain the relationship of how atoms arrange their protons, etc, The same pattern can be shown when projecting frequencies on sand particles on a flat surface or muddy water, which I am sure many have seen.
On the other hand this sounds like the ancient knowledge hidden by the secret societies. The same buggers who write our dictionaries and create our legal systems and influence our educations system etc ad nauseum (...another story, but [rant] it still bothers me, because I as research more, it is so obvious how they have created ways to specifically confuse and mislead us... ie. my latest research is on how the word "own" and "ownership" has so many different meanings that I can no longer use it in good conscience any more until I can learn how to qualify what I am saying! And there is no doubt in my mind that when you use one word when we should be using 10 different words, someone is keeping us 'down' !! That is right out of 1984! [end rant]) ie. I think this knowledge HAD TO HAVE BEEN KNOWN before a Dr Robert Moon "discovered" it. It is just reaching a point where there are so many converging sciences they can't "fake it away" anymore...
Anyhoo... if that isn't enough it also talks about how the Mayan calendar number of 260 is used because it is the smallest possible number that is literally the smallest common denominator of all the cycles that are created from it all the way up to the 25,920 year cycle. In other words, it appears the whole universe really does run like one big giant clock... when you combine that with stuff like Prof James Gates and his discovery of what appears to mathematical equations which can only be described as being the equivalent of error checking codes used in computer programming (!) (http://www.transcend.ws/has-james-gates-discovered-computer-code-in-string-theory-equations-welcome-to-the-matrix/) that he discovered while analyzing super-string theory...
The evidence keeps mounting... intelligent design doesn't have to be the mickey mouse metaphorical cartoon version spoon fed to the masses. Although it may very well be alluding to something far more complex (which it is) And I should qualify that, the bible itself is not a simple text by any means. But everywhere we look is, has to be, when you really think about it.... is indication and evidence of super complex, and intricate as can be, intelligent design! going back to Max Planck over a 100 years ago, back to Eastern Philosophy, etc, etc, as far back as the human mind can peer into 'human' history...
I just can't help myself when I see all this coming together... look at all the sciences fitting together to create this beautiful picture; ancient history, astronomy, quantum physics, sacred geometry, computer science, string theory... and people want to listen to monkeys like Richard Dawkins pointing to pictures on a chart with humans in the same categories as chimps and gorillas, yet for all his supposed brilliance he hasn't discovered the existence of the 4 species of big foots, 150,000 collected footprints, centuries of folklore, actual captures in North America, Russia and thousands more anecdotes from people all over the world? (you smell something?) Credit to Lloyd Pye, he is the MAN.
He's (Richard) is playing the same role Piers Morgan is for the MSM on gun control! He's a hatchet man to slow down true social progress, And dont' forget there is a clear agenda for the legal community to label us as "animals" Consider that according to Alfred Adask part of the 'Legal System's' interpretation of "man" is "man and other animals" gramatically stating unequivocally that they are CLEARLY inferring man IS in the category of animal.
This in direct contradiction to the bible and all spiritual and metaphysical literature. Whether you realize it or not, the legal implications of that are DANGEROUS and DIABOLICAL. WE ARE MORE THEN ANIMALS, our physicality is NOT what defines us. (and notice how both of these 'hatchetmen' are oh so 'suave' and 'sophisticated' speakers? almost like they were handpicked for the job!.. weird eh?)
and I ramble...
Anyhow check this out, this whole page is a few weeks of study+ in itself.... it is just so bloody brilliant to see all these disciplines dovetail intricacy upon intricacy...
This all ties into our consciousness. What I like to call our "proof of receipt" that we have an "interest" in this cosmos... there's no time like the present.
The point is, in another interpretation, the legal system IS trying to reflect that... everything is all part of one larger collective or entity, look at the system - city - state - country - commonwealth - queen as defender of the the faith - beholden to the Vatican - vicar of Christ - right up to the big guy himself and the final "OWNER" being 'GOD'. To me this is trying to reflect the outer reality that WE don't own anything, we're just passing through folks, and we have the right of use (beneficial ownership) but we didn't come here with anything and we aren't taking anything with us when we go, so who are we kidding while we're here? All is one, and we are all part of it. Anyhow this last part isn't in there that is my mind seeing more parallels... more evidence of hidden meaning.
And as I study how the government set up all property to be held in the state through the control of titles (NAMES) by which everything else in turn is registered under. For example I will now read a part of the definition of "municipality" out of the CC "... includes the corporation of a city, town, village... blah, blah... or local division of a province (or state), the inhabitants of which are incorporated or are entitled to hold property collectively for a public purpose. " (this wasn't the case pre-1933, but follows a St Germain ascended master's famous communication to the elites of the world in 1887 on how all wealth should be managed.
Ok, going to let my brain cool off...
haha... another update: quote from Conk's signature:
"The quantum field responds not to what we want; but to who we are being."
- Dr. Joe Dispenza"