Flu Deaths Reality Check

[DeDukshyn]

Excellent Article on the reality of the flu death stats that are used to push flu shots.

Excerpt:




It comes directly from the desk of Canada's chief public health officer. "The flu is serious," he tells us from his website. "Every year, between 2,000 and 8,000 Canadians die of the flu and its complications."
Flu's winter companions include coronavirus, adenovirus and Streptococcus pneumonia.Flu's winter companions include coronavirus, adenovirus and Streptococcus pneumonia. (Vasily Fedosenko/Reuters)

Did you ever wonder how they know that? The fact is, they don't know that. "This is a scientific guess. This is not the truth," Dr. Michael Gardam, director of the infection prevention and control unit at the University Health Network in Toronto and a longtime flu watcher, told me.

The fact is, no one knows how many people die after being infected with the flu virus. The death estimates are not based on body counts, lab tests or autopsies.

"I think people may have the misconception that every person who dies from the flu is somehow counted somewhere, and they're not," Gardam said.

Full story: http://www.cbc.ca/news/health/story/2012/11/22/flu-deaths-crowe.html

[sigma6]

On top of that, they don't record who took vaccines and who didn't. How retarded and unscientific is that??? And why wouldn't they?

They will spend millions doing controlled blind studies to roll out a new pharmaceutical drug. They may slant the evidence, by carefully choosing participants, they will pay several hundred thousand a week depending on the size of the study. And they may eliminate outliers, but none the less they do the study...

So how do vaccines escape this same standard, and if they have NEVER done statistical studies, how can they claim anything??? IS THIS STRANGE? Do you suppose the meticulous and analytically minded Bill Gates will point out that the industry has overlooked doing studies for the last 80 years??? Go Bill!

[DeDukshyn]

On top of that, they don't record who took vaccines and who didn't. How retarded and unscientific is that??? And why wouldn't they?

They will spend millions doing controlled blind studies to roll out a new pharmaceutical drug. They may slant the evidence, by carefully choosing participants, they will pay several hundred thousand a week depending on the size of the study. And they may eliminate outliers, but none the less they do the study...

So how do vaccines escape this same standard, and if they have NEVER done statistical studies, how can they claim anything??? IS THIS STRANGE? Do you suppose the meticulous and analytically minded Bill Gates will point out that the industry has overlooked doing studies for the last 80 years??? Go Bill!

One has to conclude that if they worked, they'd use those stats to sell them, rather than using unrealistic computer models to try to sell them. It's proof enough for me that even they don't believe they actually work at all.