justoneman's blabberings of the day - for those who dare

[Chester]

I wrote this up and have not edited it as of this first posting... I am sure my mind will want to jump back into this and "clean it up" but here is the "first draft." Enjoy.



Inspired by Dr. Malanga's research and latest techniques and DoT for her efforts in bringing this information to the English speaking world.



To the parent of my spirit

I have a spiritual set of parents (or possibly a single parent)

I have no word for this thing but what this thing represents to me is my own opportunity to see there’s a far bigger picture than what I might see as my own.

And this generates a natural and balanced form of “self” – not a self that crawls in on one’s hands and knees nor a self that mistakenly believes he has more value than any other manifestation of life.

The experience - The inspiration behind my individualized spirit is the gift of life I was given.


The container(s) – “bodies”


The realm(s) but for this one (Chester) – this physical (gross) realm as my spirit’s current experience’s anchor.

The mirror (the reflective property of the experiential realms)

The escape zones (the “astral”)

Home – (the causal)

The challenge – waking up to all this and having enough left in me, my body, the time I have left in this body and what now I might be able to do that could be positive and helpful for others.

Goals – That we may know more about our relationship with other beings of other physical and/or any other type of manifested form (and even if there be individuated beings unmanifest as well as perhaps a single, pre beginning unmanifest) and that we could have the ability to achieve individual and collective sovereignty and that we may find a way to assist any being that so chooses with presenting them the opportunity to experience as an embodied spirit being.

A complete, utter, respectful reverence for all life including the unmanifest (possible) source of life.

That perhaps all this is simply a gift that we are given which allows our “parents” the opportunity to experience what is impossible for them to experience.

the unborn

How can any “conflict” ever be won when the object we might be “fighting” is formless?

Impossible.

So then who/what ever does one fight? The answer for me is (and only is) myself.

So if I am the manifest that has, behind me, the unmanifest, and I take the entire situation and conclude that the only course of action is to make the very best of the situation, then in essence I am accepting my role (humbly) and then immediately embracing it all as opportunity. I suddenly give life (energy) to all things experiential and now I have that great gift of free will firmly in my own hands...

and now I make if it what I will.

I have chosen to give/experience the greatest component of all of these – the component I call love.

I cannot define love, but I always know love is there (and centered within) a moment. Each and every moment where I happen to (reflectively) say to myself, “wow... that’s the power of love in action” and I go with that flow that love seems to point me towards – I never, ever miss an opportunity to experience what used to be to me - “a miracle.”

Life for me now is not one miracle after another popping up... it is just a flowing river that is one constant, continuous miracle.

Am I now that clear sphere? I threw away that white sphere years ago. Black was at least more honest but underlying black was nothing but service to self and ultimately unfulfilling.

Clear baby... that’s the sphere.

Clear

Clarity

The clear light

Make me an instrument of thy peace, Oh Lord.

[baddbob]

In a way can this be Transactional Analysis ? I read a book quite a while ago called "I'm OK, You're OK" by Thomas Harris that deals in PAC,(Parent,Adult,Child) relationships with ones self.

[Chester]

In a way can this be Transactional Analysis ? I read a book quite a while ago called "I'm OK, You're OK" by Thomas Harris that deals in PAC,(Parent,Adult,Child) relationships with ones self.

I heard of that book - seems it has been around awhile. I would hate to label what I did there... I just wrote what came out then cleaned it up a tad.

It is mostly metaphorical. I enjoyed writing and posting it and I was glad to get some thanks.

Now was there anything in what I wrote that might make a positive difference for someone else> That was my hope in posting "it."

[Spiral]

I had to read that twice.

A beautiful & honest synopsis of a life well lived, if only we could all arrive at such an understanding.

[Orph]

The challenge – waking up to all this and having enough left in me, my body, the time I have left in this body and what now I might be able to do that could be positive and helpful for others.

Good. Then you will come to realize what might seem to be a case of someone being rude is really a case of someone being too computer-stupid to understand the behind-the-scenes workings of a on-line message board. :noidea: :lol:

[jagman]

Hello Chester,I loved the thread, but that clown pic is quite disturbing.

[Shin'Ar]

Chester this post made me recall part of an essay I wrote many years ago, which I thought you might find helpful in coming to a better understanding of the things which we have spoken about.

Below is a copy and paste that one might be able to google from elsewhere, but it is from my own writings,


"For me, solving creation is not about finding the origin to the mystery, it is about becoming something different from the rest, and being a part of that great mystery. It is about devising an improved creation. It's looking to the future of creation, and not to its past. What will creation become when it is enhanced by an improved me?
The future of creation can be a place of regret and lack of compassion, or a place of honor and respect for humanity. For my part, I want to bring honor and fellowship to the future. When I look back on my small part of creation I want to be able to say that I did what I believed to be the right and logical thing to do; not to whine about what I should have done instead.

Creation is now a place with me in it. The future creation will be a better place, because it will have an improved me in it.
There is a house about three blocks from mine where the owners leave a small child's motorized jeep out in the yard everynight. My three year old son would love to have it. I would love for him to have it myself. I cannot afford to buy one, but I could easily have that one. What is to stop me from going there late one night and throwing it in the back of the car?

Well, there it is! This one dilemma can be asked with so many references to life's various situations. Religion easily addresses the dilemma by claiming the laws of their god as authoritative. But it is not so easily answered if you cannot assign a supreme directive. If I do not adhere to any authority, than why can't I have that little car for my son? I could force them to at least share it with me.

If man learns anything in this life at all it should be that the path he walks is the path he places 'before' him, and the one he leaves 'behind' him. This path can only be made as he places one foot ahead of the other and moves forward, and he can only do so by 'choosing' which direction he will take. Without direction from another source of authority he is forced to make these decisions himself, using only what knowledge and wisdom he has attained in life. Where this path leads to will be the 'person' that he will become. At the end of that path will be the person that he created. This is why religion has been so unanimously accepted around the world. It offers man freedom from this fog of choice and sets a path before him that he can follow without having to choose for himself. Religion is a pre-cut path through the thickness of the jungle. But what happens to a man's personal experience when he begins to walk the path of another?

When I declare that I am a thought of the creator, moving forward, and evolving myself as I move, I acknowledge the fact that I am creating who and what I am, by the empowerment of the original thought of this mystery that we call the 'The Source'. Without the original I could not exist to become anything, and by the deliberate empowering design of the original I now freely design what I will become at the end of this path I am traveling. So the reason why I would not steal that child's bike has nothing to do with the moral laws of some archaic religion, or even the laws of society. The reason I would not take it is simply because I want to become the type of person who deals with others in a way that I would want them to deal with me.

An ancient wise counsel once said that we should do unto others as we would have done to ourselves. I suppose that counsel is agreeable as long as the person following it is not a sadist. To steal from others, or to do any harm to others, would make me a thief and an abuser, and that is not what I want to create. We also have to consider here that if we make abusers of ourselves, we are also making the same of mankind as a whole, because if everyone follows the same path, we end up with a race of beings that have no regard for each other, and have absolutely no ability to live with each other. Always at war, they would soon exterminate their entire species. Is that something we should strive to create for our future? If not, than we have the responsibility to make sure that we do nothing to create that in ourselves.

So, as we walk that foggy path to the source of knowledge, the origin, we are faced with choices that result in who, and what, we will become based on the decisions we make around those choices. And there are qualities of character and personality that consist of moral and immoral aspects that cannot be designated by the laws of man's philosophies and beliefs. These are qualities that are more akin to the laws of natural physics and dynamics than they are to righteousness, which is more of a religious nature. It is simply a matter of what a man wants to add to his character and identity as he walks this path. It is what he collects as supplies with which to build his character that will create the building he becomes, so to collect qualities like courage, compassion, sensitivity, loyalty, and integrity will provide supplies for a character that is the opposite of one built by using deceit, insensitivity,hate and moral corruption. The supplies we choose along the way depend entirely on what we deliberately pick up and add to our warehouse.

In my warehouse there will be nothing that does not add to the morality and integrity of my character simply because I firmly believe that this is the goal for the entire human race, and the only way that we will ever live in harmony with each other, which is what I also believe is the ultimate goal for us as humans. Love and harmony should not be cast aside as weaknesses of wishful thinking pacifists only. These should be seen as building blocks that will construct the type of buildings suitable for a place where many like it will commune together in harmony, benefiting from each other in many ways. Whereas building blocks of the anti types of these will result in a place where war and havoc will always rule over their lives. The decision is ours; the path, we will create ahead, and leave behind us."