View Full Version : Eric Holder: Home-Grown Terrorists Threat Rivals Overseas
SilentFeathers
28th February 2013, 14:15
It's coming folk's, best get prepared the best you can....
America now confronts a very different terrorist threat than it did four years ago, according to Holder. While al Qaeda's central leadership has been diminished, the group is more "widespread" geographically—and the threat of homegrown terrorists in the U.S. now rivals that of plots hatched overseas, Holder told ABC News.
Holder also plays the "Sandy Hook card" and says he cried about it, then goes in to the need to take guns away from the American people....then he plays the "sequester bs card" and says the gov can't keep people safe to scare people, etc etc etc.
This is ridiculous!
They are ramping up their agenda folk's bigtime.....don't under-estimate these "control freaks"!
Source and video:
http://abcnews.go.com/Politics/holder-terror-threat-widespread/story?id=18610592
It's almost like this creep is telling us "something is going to happen".
GoodETxSG
28th February 2013, 14:24
Okay, My fear mongering for the day, here it comes...
Homegrown Terrorists? Tea Party... Oath Keepers... Occupy movement... 2nd Amendment activists... (Disarming Vets and Citizens) ummmm people that scream for freedom.
That is US PEOPLE!
This explains why they will not rule out drone killings of US citizens on US SOIL!!!
Its a matter of time... eyes on the skies.
WHO SEE'S A PATTERN HERE FOLKS?
Obama officials refuse to say if assassination power extends to US soil
February 22, 2013, The Guardian (One of the UK's leading newspapers)
http://www.guardian.co.uk/commentisfree/2013/feb/22/obama-brennan-paul-assassinations-filibuster
The Justice Department "white paper" purporting to authorize Obama's power to extrajudicially execute US citizens was leaked three weeks ago. Since then, the administration - including the president himself and his nominee to lead the CIA, John Brennan - has been repeatedly asked whether this authority extends to US soil, i.e., whether the president has the right to execute US citizens on US soil without charges. In each instance, they have refused to answer. Brennan has been asked the question several times as part of his confirmation process. Each time, he simply pretends that the question has not been asked, opting instead to address a completely different issue. It's really worth pausing to remind ourselves of how truly radical and just plainly unbelievable this all is. What's more extraordinary: that the US Senate is repeatedly asking the Obama White House whether the president has the power to secretly order US citizens on US soil executed without charges or due process, or whether the president and his administration refuse to answer? That this is the "controversy" surrounding the confirmation of the CIA director - and it's a very muted controversy at that - shows just how extreme the degradation of US political culture is.
MR Mojo
28th February 2013, 14:25
Fear mongering at its finest.
SilentFeathers
28th February 2013, 14:27
I really don't think this is fear-mongering when they are basically rubbing this in our face and explaining to us in pretty blatant ways that this is what they "intend" to do if necessary....now they are basically saying that because of Sandy Hook, the sequester, etc etc etc...that it IS necessary.
Talk about insanity...sheesh!
ADDED: I don't think they are blowing smoke in our face all that much about feeling they are justified when it comes to killing US citizens on US soil if they "say" we are a threat.....seems pretty blunt to me they intend to do this.
SilentFeathers
28th February 2013, 14:44
This is making big news right now too and is quite revealing....
Things are getting strange and The Obama Administration is publicly threatening people now who are speaking up against them....
Veteran journalist Bob Woodward said Wednesday he was threatened by a senior Obama administration official following his reporting on the White House's handling of the forced federal spending cuts set to take effect on Friday.
"They're not happy at all," he said on CNN's "The Situation Room," adding that an e-mail from a senior administration official - who he would not name - communicated a message which caused him great concern.
http://politicalticker.blogs.cnn.com/2013/02/27/bob-woodward-says-he-was-threatened-by-white-house/
also, another journalist was threatened too:
A day after Woodward's claim that a senior White House official had told him he would "regret" writing a column criticizing President Obama's stance on the sequester, Lanny Davis, a longtime close advisor to President Bill Clinton, told WMAL's Mornings on the Mall Thursday he had received similar threats for newspaper columns he had written about Obama in the Washington Times.
http://www.wmal.com/common/page.php?pt=WMAL+EXCLUSIVE%3A+Woodward%27s+Not+Alone+-+Fmr.+Clinton+Aide+Davis+Says+He+Received+White+House+Threat&id=8924&is_corp=0
Lifebringer
28th February 2013, 15:12
But suppose an American citizen here has threatened to set off a nuke/brief case in a city, and they have a bead on him by drone before he pushes a button?
10 million in lives lost, or one lone wolf of an organization taking lives to make a point?
That is the question ladies and gents, that's the question. Is this to ensure like Republicans have been spouting, that the American citizens of foreign nationality/cells, that don't like our interest abroad? What about that, because during Bushy, this country made a lot of enemies among the threats and lies. Then you have the gun salesman here selling guns overseas, and not following up on if they are a terrorist cell, that is under International government surveylance and that citizen doesn't know, yet the weapons they sell or instruction on how to make a bomb online, are a danger to this country, if they sell them to the enemies of our state.
Lifebringer
28th February 2013, 15:19
Not fearmongering, just aware of the bigger picture. MOSTLY all the weapons come for the developed nations, NOT the undeveloped ones, yet the undeveloped innocent citizens are put through hell and war, when these people come to their shores or country. I'm sure Koni or whatever that fool's name is, didn't make those guns or buy them legitimately. But someone is doing it, has been doing it for centuries, and will continue to do it, if the phychotic Lex Luthers of the planet aren't stopped. A sniper can't be everywhere in time to save a terrorist attacker on a roof to catch a satelite signal and set it off.
Just saying, if I can think it up, so can they. If they are causing tsunamis with HAARP, they wouldn't hesitate to set one off. The Bush/Cheney regime swore about there being suitcase bombs, and I think they know, because the dark side has been using attachecases in 007, M15, and other deep covert operations.
I don't think they lied about the possibility, and I know the 7 missing nukes will surface soon, if not found.
SilentFeathers
28th February 2013, 15:30
They have a right to arrest people suspected of a crime even with circumstantial evidence, and give them a trial....they DO NOT have the right to kill "suspected" criminals without first arresting them, charging them, and giving them a trial, etc., just because they think that they MIGHT be a threat.
This is getting way out of control and is quite ludicrous IMO.....
GoodETxSG
28th February 2013, 15:46
Obama White House bragged that they Controlled the Media... Now I see how.
http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/flashback-white-house-boasted-we-control-news-media/
2009: WHITE HOUSE -- 'WE CONTROL NEWS MEDIA'
Shocking confession offered by Obama administration to foreign government
Published: 6 days ago
by AARON KLEIN Email | Archive
Subscribe to feed
Aaron Klein is WND's senior staff reporter and Jerusalem bureau chief. He also hosts "Aaron Klein Investigative Radio" on New York's WABC Radio. Follow Aaron on Twitter and Facebook.
More ↓
Ads by Google
Hot Stock PickInvest in Solar America Corp. New Solar Power Station. Buy Stock Now! www.SolarAmericaCorp.com
Text smaller
Text bigger
698
A Politico column criticizing the Obama administration’s media tactics is drawing attention, but four years ago, the White House communications director disclosed that Obama’s presidential campaign focused on “making” media cover certain issues while rarely communicating anything to the press unless it was “controlled.”
WND exposed the video of Anita Dunn speaking to the Dominican government at a videotaped conference.
Ads by Google
Say No to Obama's Amnesty
Don't let Barack Obama give amnesty to illegals. Sign petition!
Townhall.com/No-Amnesty
Obams's Gas Price Hike?
Is president Obama to blame for gas prices? Vote here now.
www.newsmax.com/surveys
Her comments were given further national attention after the popular Drudge Report posted the WND story.
Dunn stepped down two weeks after the story was released, although she said she was staying on in an advisory position.
“Very rarely did we communicate through the press anything that we didn’t absolutely control,” Dunn told the Dominican officials.
“One of the reasons we did so many of the David Plouffe videos was not just for our supporters, but also because it was a way for us to get our message out without having to actually talk to reporters,” said Dunn, referring Obama’s chief campaign manager.
“We just put that out there and made them write what Plouffe had said as opposed to Plouffe doing an interview with a reporter. So it was very much we controlled it as opposed to the press controlled it,” Dunn said.
Dunn said that whether it was a Plouffe video or an Obama speech, “a huge part of our press strategy was focused on making the media cover what Obama was actually saying as opposed to why the campaign was saying it, what the tactic was.”
The White House, she said, was “making the press cover what we were saying.”
Dunn was speaking at a Jan. 12, 2009, event hosted by the Global Foundation for Democracy and Development, which seeks to promote collaboration between the U.S. and the Dominican Republic. The event was held in Santo Domingo and was attended by the country’s president.
Tipping the balance of power
A Politico column this week by Jim Vandehei and Mike Allen described how with more technology, and fewer resources than many media companies, “the balance of power between the White House and press has tipped unmistakably toward the government.”
“This is an arguably dangerous development, and one that the Obama White House – fluent in digital media and no fan of the mainstream press – has exploited cleverly and ruthlessly.”
The column said the White House has been bypassing the media, even shutting down interviews with “many of the White House reporters who know the most and ask the toughest questions.”
In one of many examples cited, Allen and Vandehei recall that when Obama nominated Elena Kagan for the Supreme Court, Kagan gave one interview – to White House TV, produced by Obama aides.
“The balance of power used to be much more in favor of the mainstream press,” said Mike McCurry, who was Bill Clinton’s press secretary during the Monica Lewinsky scandal.
Nowadays, he said, the White House “gets away with stuff I would never have dreamed of doing.”
“When I talk to White House reporters now, they say it’s really tough to do business with people who don’t see the need to be cooperative,” McCurry said.
See video of Dunn’s remarks:
NlGNhAnwp_Y
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/flashback-white-house-boasted-we-control-news-media/#lZGA7ZVH3CCd3dt7.99
==============================VIDEO TO WATCH ON LINK
‘US mainstream news media 'captive' to warmongers
Download | Embed
Share | Email | Print (http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/291051.html)
MUST WATCH VIDEO ON ARTICLE LINK
A former CIA analyst says that the United States mainstream media is “captive” to people who like to have wars across the world.
In an interview with the U.S. Desk, Ray McGovern expressed concern about the American media’s attitude towards Iran, warning that they are now beating the drums of war against the Persian country, just like they did in the Iraq case.
Several months ahead of the 2003 invasion of Iraq, the United States, Britain and their allies claimed, through media, that Saddam Hussein, the former Iraqi dictator, possessed weapons of mass destruction. But later, American officials admitted that the WMD claims were all fake.
McGovern cited the Washington Post as an example of how the mainstream media manipulates the news, particularly to delegitimize Iran’s nuclear energy program, which is totally allowed under the Non-Proliferation Treaty (NPT).
“If [people are] only exposed to the mainstream media, that’s all they’ll get and all they’ll remember,” he warned.
In his recent article titled “Eyes Wide Shut on the Iraq War,” McGovern writes how President George W. Bush and his administration were putting the finishing touches on their unprovoked invasion of Iraq, the mainstream U.S. news media had long since capitulated, accepting the conventional wisdom that nothing could – or should – stop the march to war.
- See more at: http://www.presstv.ir/usdetail/291051.html#sthash.QrnXs4Ba.dpuf
Fred Steeves
28th February 2013, 16:12
WND exposed the video of Anita Dunn (http://www.wnd.com/2009/10/113347/) speaking to the Dominican government at a videotaped conference.
Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2013/02/flashback-white-house-boasted-we-control-news-media/#ELwJzKzQUgfZom2f.99
Ah yes, Anita Dunn. What a sweetheart she is, just like her pal, and Senior Advisor to the President Valerie Jarrett. Remember who one of her two "favorite political philosophers" is? The guy responsible for 70 or so million deaths in China?
X2FVEe7wCzs
MR Mojo
28th February 2013, 16:21
Fear mongering (or scaremongering or scare tactics) is the use of fear to influence the opinions and actions of others towards some specific end. The feared object or subject is sometimes exaggerated, and the pattern of fear mongering is usually one of repetition, in order to continuously reinforce the intended effects of this tactic, sometimes in the form of a vicious circle.
When I used the term fear mongering, in no way interpret it to mean they aren't fully ready willing and able to wreak havoc.
SilentFeathers
28th February 2013, 18:49
When these people (critters) sometimes just blurt out what they think spontaneously, and then say "whoops, I didn't mean it", well, if they didn't mean it why did they say it????
This is what they think of everyone else, even disabled children.....
Cornwall councillor Collin Brewer resigns over saying disabled children should be 'put down'
Mr Brewer made the remarks to a disabilities charity at an event designed to allow councillors to meet equal opportunity organisations and understand the issues they face.
Mr Brewer reportedly approached a stall run by Disability Cornwall at the event, and was told about the work of the charity.
He responded by saying: "Disabled children cost the council too much money and should be put down."
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/cornwall-councillor-collin-brewer-resigns-over-saying-disabled-children-should-be-put-down-8514200.html
To be put down?????
To think that they really care about the rest of us is ridiculous IMO.
To really think Eric Holder would lose any sleep over a bunch of kids getting killed (Sandy Hook) in efforts to move his gun control agenda forward is ridiculous IMO.
It's not just what these critters are saying, it's also the actions they are taking....and have taken, that brings the writing on the wall more in to focus.
MorningSong
28th February 2013, 19:42
Well, I saw this yesterday: Sarah Palin tells “D.C.: Cut the Drama. Do Your Job. Americans are sick and tired of yet another ginned-up crisis. D.C. needs to grow up, get to work, and live within its means,”
Sarah Palin: Feds ‘stockpiling bullets’ to use against us
By KEVIN CIRILLI | 2/27/13 9:26 AM EST
Sarah Palin says America will eventually default on its debt and claims that the federal government is “stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest” to prepare.
“If we are going to wet our proverbial pants over 0.3% in annual spending cuts when we’re running up trillion dollar annual deficits, then we’re done. Put a fork in us. We’re finished. We’re going to default eventually and that’s why the feds are stockpiling bullets in case of civil unrest,” Palin wrote in a Facebook message Tuesday.
The former GOP governor of Alaska was referring to the sequester, the automatic $1.2 trillion cuts in federal funding that take effect Friday unless lawmakers reach a deal.
(Also on POLITICO: Feds, media debunk Palin claim)
“D.C.: Cut the Drama. Do Your Job. Americans are sick and tired of yet another ginned-up crisis. D.C. needs to grow up, get to work, and live within its means,” wrote Palin, the GOP’s 2008 vice presidential running mate of Sen. John McCain (R-Ariz.).
She continued: “The real economic Armageddon looming before us is our runaway debt, not the sequester, which the President advocated for and signed into law and is now running around denouncing because he never had any genuine intention of reining in his reckless spending.”
Palin wrote that she wants lawmakers to “stop the hysterics.”
“If we ARE serious about putting our fiscal house in order, then let’s stop the hysterics, tighten our belts, and take our medicine.”
http://www.politico.com/story/2013/02/sarah-palin-were-finished-88166.html
And..there is this:
DHS releasing illegal immigrants before sequester
http://bigstory.ap.org/article/dhs-releasing-illegal-immigrants-sequester
What about a bunch of angry foreigners running rampage....?
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.