Baby With HIV ‘Cured’

[jackovesk]

ABC News

March 4, 2013

Doctors in Miss. & Boston discovered a baby born with HIV may be cured by mistake.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S544pvDwa_E

[Vitalux]

I'm most happy that the baby was cured of a potential health problem.

My guess is the baby probably was cured by a natural accidental method.
The last thing I have come to learn is the medical community along with the pharmacological industry would ever wish for was a cure for anything.
One only needs to study the treatment of cancer vs the natural cures to understand why I take this opinion.

What I find with this, is the pharmacological industry is trying to claim in a round about way they are responsible for curing this baby with their drugs, when it the evidence is more likely that
the mother, took her child off the drugs prescribed by the doctors and sought another solution that may have worked.

It would have been interesting to hear the mother's side of the story. After all, most of us are aware that the new media is eye level deep in the industry of lies and deception.

[baddbob]

Wow thats awesome. It would be so wonderful it they can cure HIV. Im sure we will all keep a close eye on this.Thanks jackovesk for this great post :)

[WhiteFeather]

Kill the parasite and you kill the disease. Dr Hulda Clark. And you Don't need drugs either. The cure grows right from under our feet. LMAO The anchor woman states at the end of this interview,,, "cmon scientists aids and cancer where gonna get there",,,,Gimme a break. We were there many years ago and have been suppressed by the medical monopoly system.

Dr Hulda Clark - The cure for all diseases on Pdf. Have a gander. Its free.
www.educate-yourself.org/hc/cure.pdf

[Kimberley]

Wow thats awesome. It would be so wonderful it they can cure HIV. Im sure we will all keep a close eye on this.Thanks jackovesk for this great post :)


Jim Humble has been curing HIV for years with MMS.

Much love :grouphug:

[jjjones]

jackovesk, again thank you & friends, great replies from all! :) while concocting a disease, there would need to be knowledge of a cure because it would cancel the other out. if one can assemble an automobile, then one knows how to disassemble it. i think same principle applies here. imo, the cure/antidote for the disease was already known when the disease was brought to light by the presstitutes, that is just how this "HONEST" (sarcasm) world leadership works. it is ironic that this thread is posted, just the other day was watching on the sports channel magic johnson talking sports, and i mentioned how healthy he is & looks for having hiv/aids/sida for all of those years & followed up on that comment with "wonder IF he really did have "hiv" or was he a walking advertisement for "big pharma"? $$$$$$$!! whatever, am happy that "baby" & magic are fine & doing well & hope the same for all of you & yours. namaste, peace & love universally :)

[Matisse]

AIDS is used as a big scam for pharmaceutical companies. As far as I know the actual virus hasn't yet been identified, this is why they use HIV testing, but it hasn't really been proved yet
whether testing HIV positive means you have AIDS, it's a theory. Plus the test is actually relative, in the sense that the numbers aren't the same from one country to another. For example,
say if your test comes out more than 4.2 here in Spain you are considered HIV positive, but in France or Britain it's 4.8 to be considered positive (the actual numbers I don't know, i'm just giving an example).
I knew a french girl here in Barcelona that tested positive, she really went into depression, a few years later i ran into her again and she told me that later she did the test in France and it came out negative.
I have attended a few conferences about this, and there are many many things that don't seem right. In one of the conferences I met a spanish couple, neither one had AIDS or were HIV positive, but when they
had a baby the hospital said the baby was HIV positive, they said this was impossible but the hospital insisted. So they went to Gibralter (Britain) to have the baby tested there and it was negative.
The hospital here still didn't want to acknowledge the other results so they had to move and go underground because they didn't want to medicate the baby.
I was a bit involved in this because I had a friend who was HIV positive and he had invited me to these conferences. He was diagonosed positive more than 25 years ago, he has never taken any
medication and is probably heathier than I, plus has two beautiful children with no problems at all.

http://www.omsj.org/blogs/does-aids-cause-hiv

[Mulder]

This is very interesting - I've read the Controversy about about where HIV came from & I don't believe in the theory that it came from a patient in Africa decades before the 1980s, because it would have certainly spread around the world decades earlier if the first case was decades old.

However, AIDS - is a constellation of symptoms & this is opposed to HIV - several viruses that presumably cause AIDS. The video hasn't shown that HIV doesn't cause AIDS. IMO the baby never had HIV, but tested false positive and one year later when the test was re-done, the correct result was found.