Secret Alien Agenda

[Agape]

http://www.galaksija.com/literatura/David_Jacobs_The_Threat.pdf

The Threat
Revealing the Secret Alien Agenda
By David M. Jacobs


I found the above document loaded with credible information collected from years of work with 'abuctees' very interesting though sensitive in nature , priceless to those who are attempting to approach the ET-human contact phenomenon as professional researchers and equally for those with ET contact/abduction experience.

It helps to summarize countless reports and testimonies of ET/human contact and you will find many important questions related to it posed within the document and collective information helping to find the answers.


One of the most important reasons I'm posting it here , even to this 'disclosure section' is to rise our common awareness to the fact that the whole secrecy of ET-human contact is primarilly orchestrated , supervised and controlled by ETs themselves,
for comprehensive reasons known to them, some of which has been targeted in above document, yet more remain unanswered.

Suspected effort to control the information field pertaining to ET agenda/knowledge/technologies etc., supposedly backed up by shadowy governments and many other power mongering individuals and organizations in the world longing to get the dominance over others without such advanced support is a mere peel on the orange of reality and reflection of that substantial reality in our human scatterdness and inability to respond to these ET circumstances with intelligence and strenght required either as individuals or moreso , as collective.


To those who are seriously interested in the phenomenon and can stand their own fear that naturally emerges in each of us when facing the big but intelligent unknown,

I'd recommend considering this 'agenda' from many points of view before trusting someones opinion and views as 'final'.


The fact itself that no comprehensive research/study has been conducted so far , by human science , to absorb and probe deep enough to validity of ET-human contact experiences and information directly retrieved, is alarming ,

while information dominion shifted from direct human contact to internet and people are seeking for help from computer screens,

loading their minds with another 'screen memories' rather than gaining valid solutions to their life questions.


To get a positive information- one that we can use for our own/mutual benefits and understanding is always more difficult and requires work and patience. While argumenting about views previously acquired is usually, comparatively easy.
That's where life either moves forwards , its natural speed, as meant to do, or becomes stuck in magic wheels and stale waters of inactivity, habits and empty though amuzing argumentation.

It's my wish that we all can learn something new instead and our life experiences together, improves..






:angel:

[Fredkc]

The fact itself that no comprehensive research/study has been conducted so far , by human science , to absorb and probe deep enough to validity of ET-human contact experiences and information directly retrieved, is alarming, while information dominion shifted from direct human contact to internet and people are seeking for help from computer screens, loading their minds with another 'screen memories' rather than gaining valid solutions to their life questions.
Boy does THAT need saying again!

One Zen-ish guy I read extensively back in the 70's once spoke about why he never watched/read the news anymore. His point was that it wasn't really relevant. If you want to know how the world is doing, simply look in your neighbor's eyes, and see what happens.

He summed up the news by saying "over 90% of it is all about pain, no one is feeling anymore."

Applies here too. When you think of it; Investing your energy, through fear, into someone else's 'screen memory', simply adds to the sum fear, and over an illusion, at that!
How is anyone, including yourself helped by that?

Fred

[illuminate]

Boy does THAT need saying again!

One Zen-ish guy I read extensively back in the 70's once spoke about why he never watched/read the news anymore. His point was that it wasn't really relevant. If you want to know how the world is doing, simply look in your neighbor's eyes, and see what happens.

He summed up the news by saying "over 90% of it is all about pain, no one is feeling anymore."

Applies here too. When you think of it; Investing your energy, through fear, into someone else's 'screen memory', simply adds to the sum fear, and over an illusion, at that!
How is anyone, including yourself helped by that?

Fred

Very nice! And thanks Eva!:love:

[Agape]

Excerpts from the document ( page 65....68, 69, 70..):

Why They Are Secret


Why don't the UFOs land on the White House lawn? Why don't the alien occupants step
out and say "Take me to your leader"? Why don't they make formal contact? These
obvious questions, which people have posed for years, deserve thoughtful consideration.
Yet the questions themselves are problematic because they are based on the assumption
that the aliens want to make themselves known, establish contact with humans, and speak
to our leaders. This assumption is incorrect. The evidence surrounding the UFO and
abduction phenomenon strongly points, not to revelation, but to concealment as the goal.
Why should the aliens want to keep the UFO and abduction phenomenon a secret?
Secrecy benefits the aliens and befuddles the humans. It hides the facts and fuels endless
speculations. It is responsible for prolonged and rancorous debate between proponents
and debunkers over the phenomenon's legitimacy. Secrecy also has a powerful and
negative influence on abductees. It causes them and the public to question their sanity.
Without secrecy there would be no UFO and abduction controversy.
Yet millions of people around the world have observed UFOs. Numerous photographs,
motion pictures, and videos of UFOs have stood the test of scientific analysis. Radar
traces have been part of the hard evidence for many years. How can we reconcile all the
overt evidence with a policy of secrecy?
Ultimately, UFO sightings do not compromise secrecy. It is impossible to base an
analysis of aliens' motivations and goals on the sightings of UFOs and, occasionally, their
occupants. We must conclude, then, that the aliens actively dictate the terms upon which
we can study them. They have chosen not to land on the White House lawn. They have
chosen not to make overt "contact." In the 1960s, the great French UFO researcher Aime
Michel succinctly labeled this "The Problem of Noncontact."


The Early Hypotheses: 1940s to 1960s


A sighting—any sighting—would seem to be inconsistent with a policy of secrecy. If the
technologically superior aliens wish to keep their secret, one could argue, they would
prevent witnesses from seeing them. But beginning in the late 1940s, researchers
struggled with the puzzle of why UFOs did not make formal contact. They offered
several hypotheses about noncontact. The first theories focused on human hostility,
ethical noninterference, reconnaissance, and various combinations of these three.
The "hostile humans" hypothesis suggested that UFOs were clandestine because they
feared human aggression. Instances of jet fighter pilots encountering UFOs in the air and
either wanting to fire upon them or actually shooting at them gave credence to the idea
that aliens believed we were a hostile species who posed a threat to their spacecraft.
The "hostile humans" hypothesis was particularly in vogue when America was involved
with the military mindset of World War II, the Korean conflict, and the Cold War, and
was influenced by then-current anthropological ideas that man was an innately
aggressive, warlike animal. Humankind's first reaction to extraterrestrial visitation, at
least on an institutional level, would be to use military force to control or destroy the
UFOs. By maintaining its distance, an advanced, and presumably peaceful, alien species
would avoid conflict. As Air Force analyst James Lipp said in 1949: "It is hard to believe
that any technologically accomplished race would come here, flaunt its ability in
mysterious ways and then simply go away." Lipp suggested that "the lack of purpose
apparent in the various episodes is also puzzling. Only one motive can be assigned; that
the spacemen are 'feeling out' our defenses without wanting to be belligerent."1
This theory first received popular expression in the 1951 motion picture The Day the
Earth Stood Still, in which a UFO lands near the White House and the U.S. military,
armed with guns and tanks, immediately surrounds it. A trigger-happy soldier shoots and
wounds an extraterrestrial after he emerges from the flying saucer. When the alien
escapes, he completes his mission on Earth only by living incognito with humans.
Avoiding overt contact was seen as a preventive reaction to our inherent hostility.
Early researchers also put forward the "reconnaissance" explanation for alien secrecy.
Pioneer UFO researcher Donald Keyhoe, in his 1950 Flying Saucers Are Real, advanced
the idea that "the earth has been under periodic observation from another planet, or other
planets for at least two centuries." These inspections are "part of a long-range survey and
will continue indefinitely. No immediate attempt to contact the earth seems evident.
There may be some unknown block to making contact, but it is more probable that the
spacemen's plans are not complete."2 According to Keyhoe, if we were exploring another
planet, we would not make contact until our observations were complete: "If we were to
find that the other species was hostile or belligerent, then we would go on to the next
planet."3
Building upon Keyhoe's theory, Canadian UFO investigator Wilbert Smith speculated in
1953 that when UFO occupants discover that we are a warlike people, they will depart
because we are "too primitive by their standards." For Smith and other researchers, UFO
occupants were anthropologists practicing a policy of noninterference when they
encountered a previously undiscovered tribal society. According to this theory, aliens had
a moral responsibility to protect humanity from the problems that interspecies contact
could bring. However, Smith suggested to Keyhoe that the aliens would directly
intervene if humans became too aggressive:
Suppose, for instance, our pilots discovered a lost civilization down in the
Amazon country. We'd investigate from the air to see how advanced they were
before risking direct contact. If they were a century or two behind us with
sectional wars going on, we'd possibly leave them alone—unless they had
something we wanted badly. But they might be only a decade or two behind us. In
that event we'd at least keep a close eye on them in the future. ... But if for any
reason they were a danger to the rest of the world, we'd have to bring them under
control, by reason—or threat of force.4
Aime Michel combined the "hostile humans" and noninterference hypotheses in 1956
when he suggested that UFO occupants did not contact us because it might be physically
dangerous for them. Michel said that humans are a violent people and, "considering our
bloody past, would they not be justified in thinking that their best protection is an 'iron
curtain'?" But, explained Michel, the aliens also had a selfish reason for noncontact:
"Contact would be a bad bargain for them. It would teach us far more than it would teach
them and in every way reduce their margin of superiority over us. And supposing we
found out the secret of their machines? Would we use the knowledge as prudently as they
have done?" Still, Michel thought that contact might happen "when contact does more
good than harm."5 He noted with approval that they had "respect for others" because they
had "never once attempted to interfere in our affairs."6
Aime Michel later suggested that the aliens had deliberately avoided overt contact
because of the havoc it would wreak upon human institutions and life—and aliens would
supplant us in a Darwinian survival-of-the-fittest model.7 Contact could, however, take
place without our knowledge, said Michel, because the aliens are so superior and
clandestine that "we will be as incapable of detecting their activity or of analyzing their
motives as a mouse is of reading a book."8
In the 1950s, a very divisive element entered the debate over the meaning of
noncontact—the infamous contactees. These people claimed that they were having
continuing interactions with friendly "Space Brothers." They met with aliens at various
places, including restaurants, bus terminals, and isolated areas. This was contact. And
although most serious UFO researchers quickly exposed the con-tactees as frauds, legions
of people believed their yarns and concluded that aliens had already made contact and
therefore the debate over the secret nature of the UFO phenomenon was moot.9 The
contactees lost their popularity by the 1960s, but ever since, debunkers and skeptics have
pointed to them as examples of how UFO proponents can be gullible.
In the 1960s, the "hostile humans" hypothesis declined, but the reconnaissance
hypothesis remained strong. Writing in 1962, Coral Lorenzen, codirector of the Aerial
Phenomena Research Organization, made the reconnaissance hypothesis part of the
satellite program. She said that UFOs were subjecting Earth to "a geographical,
ecological, and biological survey accompanied by a military reconnaissance of the whole
world's terrestrial defenses." According to Lorenzen this activity had increased since the
first Earth-orbiting satellite, Sputnik, in 1957, and "succeeding space probes launched by
men seem to have generated a closer scrutiny of earth by our 'visitors,' if indeed they are
real."10
Researchers Richard Hall, Ted Bloecher, and Isabel Davis of the National Investigations
Committee on Aerial Phenomena suggested in 1969 that there was no formal contact
because the aliens did not understand our civilization. "Even in the simple matter of
physical approach to human beings, the behavior of UFOs is above all contradictory; they
seem to display a mixture of caution and curiosity." UFOs did not contact humans
because "the extraterrestrials ... may still be as baffled about our behavior and motives as
we continue to be about theirs."11
However, a real contradiction existed between the hypotheses and the daily events.
Thousands of people were sighting UFOs; investigators were collecting thousands of
reports of high-level sightings, low-level sightings, and even landed UFOs; and there was
an increase in the number of "occupant" reports, in which witnesses said they saw aliens
in or near a UFO. The Barney and Betty Hill case, in the early 1960s, also helped bolster
the argument that UFOs were making covert contact.
Did this activity mean that UFOs were displaying themselves on purpose? What was the
purpose?


The Later Hypotheses: 1970s to 1990s


By the 1970s, some researchers began to theorize that UFOs were revealing themselves
slowly so that humans could get accustomed to the idea of alien visitation. Presumably,
sudden revelation would be enormously upsetting to all human institutions. Fear,
depression, and despair would follow. Suicides would probably rise. Widespread panic,
institutional disintegration, governmental crisis, and other forms of catastrophe could
follow, leading to societal chaos and anarchy. Gradual revelation would "cushion the
blow" of contact and reduce disruption; the aliens did not want to shock humans by
showing themselves too abruptly.
Therefore, the aliens allowed humans to sight UFOs as a societal "shock absorber."
Researchers hypothesized that sightings allowed us to achieve a higher form of awareness
about aliens in a constantly controlled manner, much like a thermostat controlling
temperature. Part of the alien design was to allow the idea of UFOs as extraterrestrial
objects to creep into popular culture. Thus, researchers theorized, the aliens played us like
a fiddle for our own good while they carefully monitored society's knowledge of their
presence.
UFO researcher Jacques Vallee expounded a version of this theory in The Invisible
College (1975). The random appearance and disappearances of single UFOs and waves
of sightings held special significance for Vallee. These UFO manifestations were part of
a control system designed by the aliens to "stimulate the relationship between man's
consciousness needs and the evolving complexities of the world which he must
understand." This would lead to what Vallee called "a new cosmic behavior."12
For Vallee, the UFO phenomenon resided somewhere between the physical and psychic
worlds. It was linked to man's consciousness and was called forth to condition humanity
to a shift in world view, presumably about the universe and man's place within it.13 UFO
appearances and disappearances were part of a human conditioning regimen, although
Vallee was vague about the purpose of the conditioning.
Similar theories developed. One popular idea among Jungian UFO researchers was that
UFOs were manifestations of an alternative reality that existed between the psychic and
the objective. Individual people psychically called these forms into being from an
"imaginal" realm. While they were here they were "real" and objective, but they vanished
into the other realm.14
The growing number of "occupant" sightings in the late 1970s and early 1980s added
support to the "psychic realm" hypotheses. The occupants seemed to behave in
incomprehensible ways. They avoided contact, failed to communicate, seemed to inspect
people who stood paralyzed, and then disappeared into their UFOs and flew off.
Witnesses reported UFOs swooping down upon their cars and pacing or "chasing" them.
Other reports described objects simply materializing in front of witnesses and then
disappearing without the observer seeing them fly away.
The celebrated UFO researcher and astronomer J. Allen Hynek wrestled with the
problems of noncontact and the seemingly absurd manner in which UFOs behaved. When
the UFOs initiated what appeared to be a form of contact—being seen from time to time,
buzzing cars and airplanes, scaring people, not giving humans a "gesture of good will"—
it made no sense. Why would UFOs and their occupants exhibit such bizarre behavior?
Hynek speculated that UFOs dwelled in a parallel universe or another dimension and
"popped" through to Earth. Perhaps they came on the "astral plane" in which they could
"will" themselves to be on Earth. Whatever the case, the ease with which they came to
Earth suggested that UFOs could do what they wanted without having to make formal
contact.15 Biologist and UFO researcher Frank Salisbury summed up these attitudes in
1974 by saying "The extraterrestrials might simply have their reasons for not wanting to
make formal contact, and ... we, in this stage of our development, simply cannot fathom
those reasons."16
Although theories have abounded—Earth as a refueling station for UFOS traveling to
other places, Earth as a tourist spot for aliens to gaze upon—by the late 1980s most
researchers had given up speculating about noncontact. Not enough evidence existed
upon which to base a viable hypothesis.
Then in the early 1990s, John Mack revived the debate by postulating that the purpose of
noncontact was "to invite, to remind, to permeate our culture from the bottom up as well
as the top down, and to open our consciousness in a way that avoids a conclusion that is
different from the ways we traditionally require." Humans must look for proof of the
existence of aliens in ways other than the purely rational. "It is for us to embrace the
reality of the phenomenon and to take a step forward appreciating that we live in a
universe different from the one in which we have been taught to believe."17
I believe these prior hypotheses to be inadequate to explain the UFO phenomenon. As
with most speculation about the phenomenon, researchers have based their hypotheses
about noncontact on the most circumstantial evidence. Furthermore, most theories have
placed noncontact within a human-centered context: Aliens either fear humans or want to
help them. Like Ptolemy, who assumed that Earth was the center of the solar system,
most researchers have assumed that aliens have come to Earth because they realize the
uniqueness and importance of humans. This is what the Judeo-Christian tradition
teaches.18
Indeed, most traditional theories of formal contact have been rooted in Judeo-Christian
anthropomorphism. These theories have generally assumed that an alien species would
have a strong interest in the complex thought processes, civilization, and technology of
humans. Aliens would respect us and share their scientific and technological knowledge
with us; humans would join with aliens into a community of planets. These assumptions
have been based not on evidence but on the ideas and thought processes derived from the
society and culture in which its adherents live.


Current Hypotheses and Abductions


The abduction phenomenon has always been more secretive than the UFO-sighting
phenomenon. Researchers investigated UFO sightings for fourteen years before they
came upon an abduction case. Another twenty-five years elapsed before they understood
that abductions were enormously widespread and the central focus of the UFO
phenomenon.
When researchers first began to investigate abductions, they assumed that an abduction
was a one-time, adult-onset event. Abductions suggested curiosity rather than
manipulation on the part of the aliens. As abductees recalled fragments of events,
researchers decided that aliens were "studying" or "experimenting" on people. The
secretive aliens were finished with their examination of Earth's flora and fauna and had
turned their attention to studying humans.
As the number of abduction reports grew, many researchers adopted the ethical
noninterference argument and assumed that aliens conducted their study in secret in order
not to disrupt the subject's life. Memories of an abduction could be so traumatic that they
would negatively interfere with the abductee's psychological well-being. In addition,
researchers assumed the aliens gave abductees posthypnotic suggestions not to remember
an event so that it would be buried in the subject's unconscious.
Other researchers hypothesized that an abductee would not remember an abduction
because the natural defenses of the human brain repressed the traumatic event. The
human mind could not cope with the impossibility and terror of an alien abduction; rather
than confronting the horrendous events, the mind buried the memories deep within it and
only allowed tiny pieces to "bleed" through. Investigators had to use hypnosis to recover
these repressed memories.
The argument that aliens operate in secrecy in order not to disrupt abductees' lives might
have merit were it not for the fact that the disruption in their lives is enormous even
without conscious recollection of their abduction experiences. If the aliens were indeed
concerned about not causing personal disruption, they would not abduct people in the
first place, or, at the very least, not so often over the course of their lives.
The hypotheses that abductees repress memories to cope with the trauma of an abduction
also have evidential problems. The mechanisms of traumatic memory repression are
highly debatable, and even if the hypothesis is true, the frequency of abductions militates
against repression in every case. There are many abduction events that are not traumatic
and they, too, are not remembered. Furthermore, researchers have uncovered no reports
of posthypnotic procedures that aliens might use to "bury" the abduction event. If these
procedures existed, researchers would be seeing them during every abduction.
Although the exact neurology is not known, it is most likely that the aliens store the
abduction events directly in the abductee's long-term memory system, bypassing shortterm
memory and preventing the triggering mechanism that allows for its reconstitution.
Hypnosis restores the trigger that allows the memories to come forth. Reshma Kamal was
told that the reason the aliens do not "erase" the memories altogether is that there are
aspects of them that must be retained by abductees for future reference. Thus, the
memories are intact, but inaccessible through normal recall.19
For years, the abduction phenomenon has lain hidden under layers of direct and indirect
protection—societal beliefs, scientific hostility, incomplete conscious recall,
confabulation in hypnotically recalled testimony, and alien-induced memory
manipulation. Unlike sightings of UFOs, there are no radar traces, photographs, films, or
videotapes. The evidence is primarily anecdotal, with an occasional artifact. Only one
thing is certain: Whatever the reason for it, the alien secrecy strategy has been
enormously successful. Most people who have had a lifetime of abduction experiences
remain unaware of what has happened to them. They would deny as lunacy any
suggestion that they were involved with the abduction phenomenon, even if they had
been abducted just hours before.

[John Parslow]

Hello Eva, thank you so much for this instructive thread.

Hope you are well and happy, as ever my love and peace to you. JP :cool:

[Agape]

Thank you John, for your support and friendship. :hug:

Your thoughts on the subject are most welcome..

[Astra]

Dear Eva, thanks for starting this thread! Best wishes to you ... and much Love.
:hug:
Astra

[sunflower]

David Jacobs is a reputable researcher. I have read some of his work already.

Fredkc, you brought up an original perspective. I had not thought of that before.

Thanks, Agape, for bringing this pdf to our attention. Unfortunately I have to prepare supper before I can delve too far into it. :(

[Caren]

Hi there Eva, thank you for this very interesting thread. I wish you much love and peace. :)

[Agape]

Boy does THAT need saying again!

One Zen-ish guy I read extensively back in the 70's once spoke about why he never watched/read the news anymore. His point was that it wasn't really relevant. If you want to know how the world is doing, simply look in your neighbor's eyes, and see what happens.

He summed up the news by saying "over 90% of it is all about pain, no one is feeling anymore."

Applies here too. When you think of it; Investing your energy, through fear, into someone else's 'screen memory', simply adds to the sum fear, and over an illusion, at that!
How is anyone, including yourself helped by that?

Fred


Constructive approach, I'd suggest. But it goes all the way back to when I first came to internet and the very reason of it..

It sometimes feels as me versus the net, of course, that's exaggerrated , but not far from the truth either. I did not suspect it to be 'that way'.
It's simply that not all of us here are, lets say, following their puposes , and I do I know what are everyones true purposes and tasks in life ?
Nope, only they know.

The matrix of information and inteligencies employed to create connection between us is tremendous and can be overwhelming, I know that we shall win over it again, one day but I also need to know that I'm ( or anyone else is ) able to win over it , in this life, to some extent at least, not to fail the very purpose of why am I here and tasks I carry.

The substantial question is close to the one of trust . It's one that deceived me most ( and I'm afraid it does to many others as well ) right from the start.

Imagine entering this internet world from temple compunds where peoples emotions , daily communication, it all is open and transparent and controlled to some extent, because it how it works in every small or large 'family unit'. Besides that being voluntarily part of an education system that teaches truth being the foremost virtue and necessity, together with non violence and will to help each other, it's never perfect but somehow, it works.

And then , I mean, even without internet , one returns to technologically advanced society ( I refer to humans now ) where people seldom keep to their word and cast suspicious looks upon each other and seldom anyone is believed and helped on 'human basis' because there's a system that 'takes care' of it all and 'we need to trust authorities' and 'system' and go to job ( else the system would fail I suppose and kids would be hungry.. would they..)

And then you look back to where you came from , I mean other countries like India and see all the hungry children on streets begging for food and in need of medicines and here those 'bosses' supposed to be on top of the food chain, never happy with what they have ..

And one looks straight to their eyes and they look away because truth in their lives lost value, and going to search for other people who want to know the truth,
one may find they're rare,
as diamonds in the sand dunes..


In another words, this world is big and people are rare , truth is rare and too many people refuse to learn a thing.



:wub:

[Agape]

Hi there Eva, thank you for this very interesting thread. I wish you much love and peace. :)

Thanks and love back to you dear Caren, I hope that the information can be of some use to those here pondering about ETs , the topic is so vast of course ..

I'm looking forwards to some interesting questions coming up here...




:hug: