PDA

View Full Version : The “Wow! signal” of the terrestrial genetic code



Studeo
16th March 2013, 00:51
Abstract

It has been repeatedly proposed to expand the scope for SETI, and one of the suggested alternatives to radio is the biological media. Genomic DNA is already used on Earth to store non-biological information. Though smaller in capacity, but stronger in noise immunity is the genetic code. The code is a flexible mapping between codons and amino acids, and this flexibility allows modifying the code artificially. But once fixed, the code might stay unchanged over cosmological timescales; in fact, it is the most durable construct known. Therefore it represents an exceptionally reliable storage for an intelligent signature, if that conforms to biological and thermodynamic requirements. As the actual scenario for the origin of terrestrial life is far from being settled, the proposal that it might have been seeded intentionally cannot be ruled out. A statistically strong intelligent-like “signal” in the genetic code is then a testable consequence of such scenario. Here we show that the terrestrial code displays a thorough precision-type orderliness matching the criteria to be considered an informational signal. Simple arrangements of the code reveal an ensemble of arithmetical and ideographical patterns of the same symbolic language. Accurate and systematic, these underlying patterns appear as a product of precision logic and nontrivial computing rather than of stochastic processes (the null hypothesis that they are due to chance coupled with presumable evolutionary pathways is rejected with P-value < 10–13). The patterns display readily recognizable hallmarks of artificiality, among which are the symbol of zero, the privileged decimal syntax and semantical symmetries. Besides, extraction of the signal involves logically straightforward but abstract operations, making the patterns essentially irreducible to natural origin. Plausible ways of embedding the signal into the code and possible interpretation of its content are discussed. Overall, while the code is nearly optimized biologically, its limited capacity is used extremely efficiently to pass non-biological information.


Highlights


► The SETI hypothesis of an intelligent signal in the genetic code is tested. ► The code is shown to possess an ensemble of same-style precision-type patterns. ► The patterns are shown to match the criteria of an intelligent signal.


http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0019103513000791

JohnEAngel
16th March 2013, 01:14
well i don't understand those technical terms regarding expanding the scope of SETI but it is my opinion that SETI was only created to give an impression that a search for ETs is operational.

sigma6
16th March 2013, 03:04
(the null hypothesis that they are due to chance coupled with presumable evolutionary pathways is rejected with P-value < 10–13).

what exactly is the unit of measure on this? 10-13 what? It can't be percent, it has to be under 5% to be considered acceptable and even that is considered too high for most studies... I would say your missing some decimals.


Otherwise I agree whole heartedly, and have heard this argument before, ie. that the "junk DNA" is not junk at all... just information that hasn't been decoded yet. Typical scientists and their denial of the facts when confronted with phenomena they don't fully comprehend.

ThePythonicCow
16th March 2013, 05:13
(the null hypothesis that they are due to chance coupled with presumable evolutionary pathways is rejected with P-value < 10–13).

what exactly is the unit of measure on this? 10-13 what? It can't be percent, it has to be under 5% to be considered acceptable and even that is considered too high for most studies... I would say your missing some decimals.

If you click the link that the original post provided, you will observe that 10-13 means "ten to the minus thirteen". The Avalon forum software doesn't support formatting exponents and subscripts correctly.

"Ten to the minus thirteen" is really small :).

minkton
22nd March 2013, 12:20
well i don't understand those technical terms regarding expanding the scope of SETI but it is my opinion that SETI was only created to give an impression that a search for ETs is operational.

I'm wondering on what basis you have this opinion.