Cidersomerset
20th March 2013, 13:16
Is this a psyop ? cause paranoia threaten the 2nd amendment, knowing it will
have the opposite effect. Over arm the population by fear of losing right to bear
arms. Start the civil war that was supposed to have happened a few years ago.
then dissarm the public after a messy civil war in several years time ??
Sounds outragous , but i'm not so sure ? It would explain the FEMA camps etc.
Assault Weapons Ban Dropped from Senate Gun Bill
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:32
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March201391/a04-guns-25-4_3_r536_c534.jpg
'Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday he hopes have a bill to address
gun violence on the Senate floor soon after the Easter break, but confirmed that
measure will not include the assault weapons ban.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters Tuesday she is disappointed that her
assault weapons ban will not be part of a larger bill, but acknowledged it will likely
make it easier to pass gun-related legislation through the Senate.
Feinstein said Reid told her Monday afternoon that the ban on certain types of
military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines would not be part of
package of bills that would make up the Senate legislation.'
Read more: Assault Weapons Ban Dropped from Senate Gun Bill
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines
=======================================================
Congressmen Demand DHS Explain 1.6 Billion Bullets Purchase
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:46
Posted by David Icke
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March201391/dhs-ammo-220x220.jpg
'Congressman Leonard Lance (R-NJ) has come out and demanded that Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano explain why the Department of Homeland
Security has been engaging in huge amounts of purchases of ammunition over the
past year. Rep. Lance has called on Congress to get involved in ascertaining DHS’
stockpiling of ammunition which is enough to wage a 20 year plus war, which has
most certainly caused a shortage in the public market.'
Read more: Congressmen Demand DHS Explain 1.6 Billion Bullets Purchase
-------------------------------------------------------------
DHS Refuses to Answer Congress on 1.6 Billion Bullet Purchase
HbfjxjpKoR8
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/81630-congressmen-demand-dhs-explain-16-billion-bullets-purchase
====================================================
DHS Arming for CIVIL WAR! purchase order for 1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition
PUYBL0nPUas
Published on 13 Mar 2013
The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled
Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice. It
confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase
order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. As reported elsewhere, much of this
purchase order is for rounds forbidden by international law for use in war, along
with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the
height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month.
Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years. In
America.
Add to this perplexing outré purchase of ammo, DHS now is showing off its
acquisition of heavily armored personnel carriers, repatriated from the Iraqi and
Afghani theaters of operation. As observed by "paramilblogger" Ken Jorgustin last
September: [T]he Department of Homeland Security is apparently taking delivery
(apparently through the Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico VA, via the
manufacturer -- Navistar Defense LLC) of an undetermined number of the recently
retrofitted 2,717 'Mine Resistant Protected' MaxxPro MRAP vehicles for service on
the streets of the United States." These MRAP's ARE BEING SEEN ON U.S. STREETS
all across America by verified observers with photos, videos, and descriptions."
Regardless of the exact number of MRAP's being delivered to DHS (and evidently
some to POLICE via DHS, as has been observed), why would they need such over-
the-top vehicles on U.S. streets to withstand IEDs, mine blasts, and 50 caliber hits
to bullet-proof glass? In a war zone... yes, definitely. Let's protect our men and
women. On the streets of America... ?" "They all have gun ports... Gun Ports? In
the theater of war, yes. On the streets of America...? Seriously, why would DHS
need such a vehicle on our streets?"
Why indeed? It is utterly inconceivable that Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Janet Napolitano is planning a coup d'etat against President Obama, and
the Congress, to install herself as Supreme Ruler of the United States of America.
There, however, are real signs that the Department bureaucrats are running amok.
About 20 years ago this columnist worked, for two years, in the U.S. Department of
Energy's general counsel's office in its procurement and finance division. And is
wise to the ways. The answer to "why would DHS need such a vehicle?" almost
certainly is this: it's a cool toy and these (reportedly) million dollar toys are being
recycled, without much of a impact on the DHS budget. So... why not?
have the opposite effect. Over arm the population by fear of losing right to bear
arms. Start the civil war that was supposed to have happened a few years ago.
then dissarm the public after a messy civil war in several years time ??
Sounds outragous , but i'm not so sure ? It would explain the FEMA camps etc.
Assault Weapons Ban Dropped from Senate Gun Bill
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:32
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March201391/a04-guns-25-4_3_r536_c534.jpg
'Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid said Tuesday he hopes have a bill to address
gun violence on the Senate floor soon after the Easter break, but confirmed that
measure will not include the assault weapons ban.
Sen. Dianne Feinstein, D-Calif., told reporters Tuesday she is disappointed that her
assault weapons ban will not be part of a larger bill, but acknowledged it will likely
make it easier to pass gun-related legislation through the Senate.
Feinstein said Reid told her Monday afternoon that the ban on certain types of
military-style assault weapons and high-capacity magazines would not be part of
package of bills that would make up the Senate legislation.'
Read more: Assault Weapons Ban Dropped from Senate Gun Bill
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines
=======================================================
Congressmen Demand DHS Explain 1.6 Billion Bullets Purchase
Wednesday, 20 March 2013 10:46
Posted by David Icke
http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/March201391/dhs-ammo-220x220.jpg
'Congressman Leonard Lance (R-NJ) has come out and demanded that Homeland
Security Secretary Janet Napolitano explain why the Department of Homeland
Security has been engaging in huge amounts of purchases of ammunition over the
past year. Rep. Lance has called on Congress to get involved in ascertaining DHS’
stockpiling of ammunition which is enough to wage a 20 year plus war, which has
most certainly caused a shortage in the public market.'
Read more: Congressmen Demand DHS Explain 1.6 Billion Bullets Purchase
-------------------------------------------------------------
DHS Refuses to Answer Congress on 1.6 Billion Bullet Purchase
HbfjxjpKoR8
http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/81630-congressmen-demand-dhs-explain-16-billion-bullets-purchase
====================================================
DHS Arming for CIVIL WAR! purchase order for 1.6 BILLION rounds of ammunition
PUYBL0nPUas
Published on 13 Mar 2013
The Denver Post, on February 15th, ran an Associated Press article entitled
Homeland Security aims to buy 1.6b rounds of ammo, so far to little notice. It
confirmed that the Department of Homeland Security has issued an open purchase
order for 1.6 billion rounds of ammunition. As reported elsewhere, much of this
purchase order is for rounds forbidden by international law for use in war, along
with a frightening amount specialized for snipers. Also reported elsewhere, at the
height of the Iraq War the Army was expending less than 6 million rounds a month.
Therefore 1.6 billion rounds would be enough to sustain a hot war for 20+ years. In
America.
Add to this perplexing outré purchase of ammo, DHS now is showing off its
acquisition of heavily armored personnel carriers, repatriated from the Iraqi and
Afghani theaters of operation. As observed by "paramilblogger" Ken Jorgustin last
September: [T]he Department of Homeland Security is apparently taking delivery
(apparently through the Marine Corps Systems Command, Quantico VA, via the
manufacturer -- Navistar Defense LLC) of an undetermined number of the recently
retrofitted 2,717 'Mine Resistant Protected' MaxxPro MRAP vehicles for service on
the streets of the United States." These MRAP's ARE BEING SEEN ON U.S. STREETS
all across America by verified observers with photos, videos, and descriptions."
Regardless of the exact number of MRAP's being delivered to DHS (and evidently
some to POLICE via DHS, as has been observed), why would they need such over-
the-top vehicles on U.S. streets to withstand IEDs, mine blasts, and 50 caliber hits
to bullet-proof glass? In a war zone... yes, definitely. Let's protect our men and
women. On the streets of America... ?" "They all have gun ports... Gun Ports? In
the theater of war, yes. On the streets of America...? Seriously, why would DHS
need such a vehicle on our streets?"
Why indeed? It is utterly inconceivable that Department of Homeland Security
Secretary Janet Napolitano is planning a coup d'etat against President Obama, and
the Congress, to install herself as Supreme Ruler of the United States of America.
There, however, are real signs that the Department bureaucrats are running amok.
About 20 years ago this columnist worked, for two years, in the U.S. Department of
Energy's general counsel's office in its procurement and finance division. And is
wise to the ways. The answer to "why would DHS need such a vehicle?" almost
certainly is this: it's a cool toy and these (reportedly) million dollar toys are being
recycled, without much of a impact on the DHS budget. So... why not?