Was the 6.3 quake in Iran Engineered?

[marlowe]

April 9 has been Nuclear Technology Day in Iran since 2006....

The 6.3 was shallow 6.2 miles deep...this is always an indicator of an engineered quake...

The quake hit at 3:22 PM local time in southern Iran not far from an Iraian nuke plant...hundreds dead or injured....322 is the Skull & Bones code number...

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Skull_and_Bones

Today is the 10th anniversary of the capture of Bagdad by US military in 2003....

I have been interested in HAARPed quakes for the last 3 years...you can google
'quakes HAARPed on scientology holidays & christian holy days 'to see my research....

[sheme]

I confess this possibility flashed through my mind. Peace and love to the souls injured by this event.

[syrwong]

Not just a possibility. Pretty convincing numbers they picked too.

[marlowe]

the link is in German ,,so i won't post it...,but it says 2 cities are mostly destroyed....one is 10 thousand people and the other is 20 thousand people ..+ 2 villages of 3 K each....the nuke reactors are untouched thankfully....

[WyoSeeker]

Not disputing this idea because of the other coincidences but the news stories I saw put the local time at 4:22.

Still, an earthquake hits an Iranian nuclear reactor while Iran is celebrating Nuclear Technology Day?!?

Just a coincidence I'm sure. "Nothing to see here folks, move along."

[marlowe]

@Wyoseeker...
USGS is saying the quake happenend at 03:22:50 at epicenter.....
maybe your source was a time zone away from the epicenter....

[Hervé]

Looks like a pretty normal earthquake to me (as recorded at La Gomera station, Canary Islands):


MAG (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#magnitude)UTC DATE-TIME h:m:s ___ (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#date)LAT___ (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#location)LON _ (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#location)DEPTH km (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#depth) Region (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/glossary.php#region)

MAP (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Maps/10/50_30.php) 6.3 2013/04/09 11:52:50 (http://projectavalon.net/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb000g2y5.php) 28.500 51.591 10.0 SOUTHERN IRAN


http://www.ign.es/ign/resources/volcanologia/DATOS/2013/EGOM/imagenes_sismica/DIA/EGOM_2013-04-09.jpg

Now, the above is a fact.

What are your facts as claimed in the OP?

[Selene]

AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

[marlowe]

AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

Selene: the best thread I started and worked on related to the quakes near Christchurch,New Zealand.....here is the link>>>>

http://tinfoilpalace.eamped.com/2011/06/15/quakes-haarped-on-scientology-holidays-christian-h/

the mod on that forum lived in NZ and also contributed to it greatly....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.

[Hervé]

AmerZo, is there some way to distinguish the data on a 'natural' quake from a 'Haarp' version?

Just wondering. A mini-seminar with examples would be helpful (even as a separate thread if necessary), if you can provide such.

Many thanks,

Selene

Good question!

The one thing I know is the distinction that can be made with nuclear devices underground explosions/tests:


21094


With earthquakes attributed to HAARP, one would have to find evidence of the ground being "resonated" up to rupture as described by Dr. Brooks Agnew:


m95hhRRuDv8

j1jIjx0XF_U


Check also this classic "Holes In Heaven" video for an overview on the capabilities of HAARP and derived technologies:


oZBSj9LbMFs


So far, the only earthquake that was accompanied by a sustained electromagnetic resonance was the 3/11 one in Japan and its accompanying tsunami:


21095
(Click on picture to enlarge)

[Hervé]

[...]

....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.

Sorry marlowe but this "evidence" is so vague and all encompassing that all the earthquakes that have occurred under the El Hierro island, Canary Islands, can be made to fit that model....

http://www.ign.es/ign/resources/volcanologia/jpg/Eventos_HIERRO_2011-2013.jpg


That's close to 20,000 earthquakes...

[ghostrider]

most quakes are deep in the earth, when I see the depth at 10 km, I get suspicious ...to me the crust movement should originate much deeper ... the depth of 10km always catches my attention, like it jumps out to me in 3-D screaming look again ...

[Hervé]

Moreover, the area within which the Iran EQ occurred was pinpointed by Stan Deyo on April 8 in his map of anomalous thermal gradient (http://standeyo.com/NEWS/13_Quake_4casts/13_Quake_4casts.html):

http://standeyo.com/NEWS/13_Quake_4casts/13_Quake_4casts_pics/130408.Seismic_Map.jpg

The area is also located along a tectonically active fracture zone which goes up to Turkey and into the Mediterranean.

[ghostrider]

Moreover, the area within which the Iran EQ occurred was pinpointed by Stan Deyo on April 8 in his map of anomalous thermal gradient (http://standeyo.com/NEWS/13_Quake_4casts/13_Quake_4casts.html):

http://standeyo.com/NEWS/13_Quake_4casts/13_Quake_4casts_pics/130408.Seismic_Map.jpg

The area is also located along a tectonically active fracture zone which goes up to Turkey and into the Mediterranean.

good chart, imagine the ptb aiming the haarp weapon at the most fragile part of the fracture zone and letting earth do the rest ...

[marlowe]

Iran's Ahmadinejad orders launch of 5 nuclear reactors {April 9.2013}
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/articles/455097/20130409/iran-tehran-nuclear-reactor-uranium-mine-plant.htm

Iran has been celebrating Nuclear Technology Day on April 9 since 2006 {the last 8 years}

the 6.4 mag quake hits near the nuclear facility ,it's shallow,and it hits at 3:22 in the afternoon....and 322 is a Skull & Bones code number.......

[marlowe]

At the risk of being obnoxious I predicted the Fukushima mega quake eleven {11}

minutes before it happened....and being an intuitive I started the "Quake Watch Over Japan" 2 weeks before March 11,2011...

here is the thread I started in late February of 2011 & my quake prediction is post # 11....

http://www.davidicke.com/forum/showthread.php?t=159615

note :even people who hated my guts congratulated me...

i fixed the link it works now:sing:

[Davidallany]

I wouldn't doubt it if it indeed was engineered.

[Hervé]

marlowe,

Sarcasm, ridicule, ad hominem, etc... are no substitutes to factual data and evidence.

Hence, my question regarding this thread's title stands: what's the FACT?

PS: I am not interested in beliefs nor faith in this matter, just asking for the evidence.

[syrwong]

Conspiracy theorists never produce conclusive evidence, else it is not a conspiracy, or they will be dead. They offer a view supported by many usually weak evidence, and many unlikely coincidences. No, they can never prove TPTB guilty, but neither can TPTB prove they are innocent by remaining hidden and imitating nature.

This case is still a weak conspiracy theory. Do we really have the time of earthquake as stated? Can HAARP produce an effect accurate up to a minute? There is a good case for coincidences though.

[marlowe]

http://tinfoilpalace.eamped.com/2011/06/15/quakes-haarped-on-scientology-holidays-christian-h/

the mod on that forum lived in NZ and also contributed to it greatly....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.[/QUOTE]

Above is my research on HAARPed quakes in New Zealand starting with the first big one on Sept 4th,2010..

and following through to the killer quake on Feb,22,2011....and beyond..........

So this post is about my research on the HAARPed quakes near Christchurch in 2010/11......{mostly}

[Kristin]

Marlowe,

You openly state that your information is garnered by intuition. All well and good. You have a right to share that and also others have a right to seek more substantial evidence. However, no member here has the right to openly attack another. You need to keep that in mind when posting in the future.

From the Heart,
Kristin

[marlowe]

Marlowe,

You openly state that your information is garnered by intuition. All well and good. You have a right to share that and also others have a right to seek more substantial evidence. However, no member here has the right to openly attack another. You need to keep that in mind when posting in the future.

From the Heart,
Kristin
Kristin,...My research and conclusions are based on statistical probilities.....

as an example :What are the statistical odds that the 5 largest quakes to hit Christchurch between Sept 4,2010

& Feb.22,2011 were ALL on Scientology holidays ?

********************************************************************************
Another Example: The 7.9 April 11,2012 Mexico quake that hit in the state of Gerrero at 2 minutes after 12 noon....
There was a well advertized quake drill on that day for 12 noon...the TV adds & flyers asked people to leave buildings etc....the drill was for a 7.9 quake....at noon on April 11,2012 in that area on Mexico.....OK? & that 7.9 quake hit 2 minutes later ....

I cannot pruduce FACTS that this 7.9 quake was engineered......But to argue that it was a coincedence is absurd ....

So yesterday we had a 6.4 quake near a nuclear facility in Iran on the day that for the last 8 years has been Nuclear Technology Day in Iran......The quake was shallow....and it hit at 3:22 at it's epicenter....and 322 is the Skull & Bones code number.....

What are the statistical odds that the quake was natural......BTW...the term HAARPed is a way of saying engineered....maybe HAARP wasn't used...Maybe it was Tesla Scalar Wave weapons technology ?..

[Kristin]

All well and good... statistics and intuition. Very interesting.

Attacking other members is not acceptable. You have been warned.

From the Heart,
Kristin

[Hervé]

[...]

...and it hit at 3:22 at it's epicenter....

[...]

If you check the UTC time of occurrence at epicenter, it's 11:52:50.

Unless there is a time zone in Iran that's off by 1/2 hour like in Newfoundland, there is no way it could come down to be 03:22.

[marlowe]

[...]

...and it hit at 3:22 at it's epicenter....

[...]



If you check the UTC time of occurrence at epicenter, it' 11:52:50.

Unless there is a time zone in Iran that's off by 1/2 hour like in Newfoundland, there is no way it could come down to be 03:22.

here is the USGS link..it clearly says the 6.3 hit at 03:22:50 at epicenter

http://earthquake.usgs.gov/earthquakes/recenteqsww/Quakes/usb000g2y5.php

Check mate....:wizard:

[Kristin]

I've changed the thread title to: "Was the 6.3 quake in Iran Engineered?" to reflect the discussion.

Please carry on in the spirit of truth gathering and compassionate discussion.

Thank you,
Kristin

[Hervé]

---

:dance:


Iran has indeed a time zone that's 1/2 hour off,

However, it is following daylight saving time which adds 1 hour to UTC + 3:30

Hence, as posted earlier in the thread by someone else, local time was 04:22:50 PM; that is, 16:22:50 local time.





Daylight Saving Time rules as of 2013

Country _ Continent _ Hemisphere _ DST start _____ DST end ________ Notes

Iran (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Iran) ______ Asia ______ North __ March 21–22 __ September 21–22__ Observed DST in 1977-1980, 1991-2005 and since 2008.

[marlowe]

Be that as it may the official United States Government site says

03:22:50.......and TPTB control the USGS site ......{imo}

like they control the main stream media,Wall Street ,etc.

You want FACTS...That is a fact...It's on the USGS site ...

[Hervé]

Since you use statistics and probabilities, what's the weight of your choice of the uncorrected USGS time zone vs. the UTC time or local time to assert the 6.3 quake to be a Skull & Bones signature?

[marlowe]

the best thread I started and worked on related to the quakes near Christchurch,New Zealand.....here is the link>>>>

http://tinfoilpalace.eamped.com/2011/06/15/quakes-haarped-on-scientology-holidays-christian-h/

the mod on that forum lived in NZ and also contributed to it greatly....Engineered quakes are always shallow
{between 10 & 30 KMs...}...they often happen near the top of the hour.
*******************************************************************************************
For those of you who don't have the time to read my research on the Christchurch quakes let me summerize....

I am an old man I have been studying many ,many things for a LOOOONG time...One of my areas of research

is ceremonial magic..both black & white...
I believe that TPTB are performing ceremonial Black Magic on a global scale....using engineered disasters,earthquakes,dates and numbers ....for instance The BP oil spill in the Gulf of Mexico happened on Hitler's birthday..Coincedence ? I don't think so....

The gigantic quake [one of the largest in recorded history} that hit offshore Chile on Feb.27,2010 happened on the anniversary of the Reichstag fire that brought Hitler into power.....& the birthday of Constantine the Great,the Roman emperer who helped make Christianity the official religion of the empire...so people could be manipulated easier...

The first clue I got was the Easter Sunday quake in Baja <Mexico in 2010....Easter is a major Christian holy day.......Then we started getting the Christchurch quakes...as in the church of Jesus Christ.....Get it ?

I am not a Christian but it is clear to me that TPTB want to destroy Christianity and replace it with something else....

OK ? so the 3 most likely dates for a 6 mag quake or higher in the past 10 yeras are Chrismas,New Years ,and Halloween......
********************************************************************************Some people reading this won't be able to connect the dots...some will....