CNN misleads viewers (new proof again)

[Operator]

A Dutch mainstream newspaper now dares to publish an article like this (criticizing other MSM):

http://www.telegraaf.nl/tv/opmerkelijk/21548136/__CNN_nept_kijkers__.html (link contains English spoken video)


CNN is caught red-handed. It looks like the ladies have contact through a satellite connection, but in reality they are in the same parking lot.

Search for "cnn fake news gulf war" on YouTube and you will find earlier proof.
In the nineties we believed all this stuff. Now in hindsight it looks hilarious.

[InCiDeR]

Not CNN exclusive, but highly interesting interview:

LIBYA: A Journalist tells the Truth & the lies explained
y8F5bYbU9-g

EDIT: Jeez, I LOVE THIS GUY!!!

[Sidney]

That is hilarious. I noticed the same silver truck first thing. Unbelievable. Sociopaths have no common sense.
TSK TSK:bump:

[Bill Ryan]

------

Two 'blue screen' CNN exposés (the second one of which is hilarious). :)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gr-EB7wInmw


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=1LK9a8AT2b8

[Kryztian]

Great one. The deception is right there before our eyes, and it just took one person to figure it out!

Reminds me of Peter Levenda's story of sitting in a restaurant in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and watching CNN and a story about a riot in Kuala Lumpur comes on the TV over the bar. He sees images of people rioting and the word "LIVE" projected and wonders where in the city he is in it is taking place. Then finds out it is on the very same square, his restaurant is located on. He looks out the window, sees a small group of people having an animated but non-violent altercation. Through the camera work on TV, the group seems much larger and more disruptive than it looks out the window. Meanwhile, CNN anchors make it sound like a major incident, even though no one in the restaurant would have been aware of the situation if the TV had not been on.

[Nenuphar]

Wow. Just pathetic. The second CNN clip Bill posted looks like a cheap comedy routine!

[Operator]

Wow. Just pathetic. The second CNN clip Bill posted looks like a cheap comedy routine!

Yes that's the one is was referring to in my OP ...


Search for "cnn fake news gulf war" on YouTube and you will find earlier proof.

I really am questioning myself now how I could have ever thought this stuff was credible.
Proof that we must have been deep asleep all this time.


In the nineties we believed all this stuff. Now in hindsight it looks hilarious.

[Mercedes]

I saw that video yesterday on IMGUR, it's just hilarious, how they don't really try very hard on their deceit, and sad that most of us don't take notice.

[Cidersomerset]

CNN Is Beyond A Joke: Presenter and Reporter Hold Split-Screen Interview in Same
Parking Lot
Thursday, 09 May 2013 12:36
Posted by David Icke



'In a bizarre television and spatial anomaly on CNN this morning, the blanket
coverage of two true-crime stories led two news anchors to conduct an
odd "satellite" interview from the very same parking lot, background traffic and all.


http://www.theatlanticwire.com/static/img/upload/2013/05/07/Bus%20(1).jpg


The two suspects are Ashleigh Banfield of CNN and Nancy Grace of Headline News,
who were updating viewers on the latest from the ongoing and increasingly ugly
Cleveland kidnapping story. (Grace being TV's leading expert on deviant crime.) At
first it seems like a normal TV "remote," as Banfield interviews Grace from another
location. Then the channel's graphics alert viewers: both anchors are in Phoenix.
That's odd. Also: They're both outdoors, sitting in what looks to be a parking lot.
And is that same building behind them?'




Read more: CNN Is Beyond A Joke: Presenter and Reporter Hold Split-Screen
Interview in Same Parking Lot

http://www.davidicke.com/headlines/83916-cnn-is-beyond-a-joke-presenter-and-reporter-hold-split-screen-interview-in-same-parking-lot



Then things truly get bizarre. Watch the cars moving in the background of both shots:

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/static/img/upload/2013/05/07/Truck2.gif

Did you see it? Watch the Nissan Xterra from Ashley's side enter on Nancy's:

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/static/img/upload/2013/05/07/Truck1.gif

Okay, if you're still not seeing it, look for the moment when the same bus is in both shots.

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/static/img/upload/2013/05/07/Truck3%20(1).gif

http://www.theatlanticwire.com/national/2013/05/nancy-grace-ashleigh-banfield-cnn-parking-lot/64965/

[Cidersomerset]

Then there was Amber Lyons public denouncement of CNN
and the mainstreams use of propaganda.


Amber Lyon reveals CNN lies and war propaganda

CFDC7zmJgQg


Published on 2 Oct 2012


Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu and Iranian President
Mahmoud Ahmadinejad both delivered two of the most controversial
speeches at the latest session of the United Nations General Assembly.
And while the Israeli's speech was aired in full on CNN, the Iranian's
address has been ruthlessly cut and the viewers have missed some
very important points. What are the ramifications of this kind of
selective reporting? RT's Liz Wahl is joined by Amber Lyon, a
three-time Emmy award winning journalist who suggests that
sensationalism, hype and downright propaganda is being used
to push America into a war with Iran.

==================================================

CNN Propaganda Machine Exposed!!! Interview with Former Reporter Amber Lyon

65ZtliT1qqc


Alex says CNN has strong CIA links......

[Fred Steeves]

Reminds me of Peter Levenda's story of sitting in a restaurant in Kuala Lumpur, Malaysia and watching CNN and a story about a riot in Kuala Lumpur comes on the TV over the bar. He sees images of people rioting and the word "LIVE" projected and wonders where in the city he is in it is taking place. Then finds out it is on the very same square, his restaurant is located on. He looks out the window, sees a small group of people having an animated but non-violent altercation. Through the camera work on TV, the group seems much larger and more disruptive than it looks out the window. Meanwhile, CNN anchors make it sound like a major incident, even though no one in the restaurant would have been aware of the situation if the TV had not been on.

That reminds me of a first hand look I got of that sort of thing. Nothing of a nefarious nature, but still a good little insight into slight of camera none the less. Back in 2002 after my home town Tampa Bay Buccaneers had finally won a Super Bowl, I took a day off of work to go watch the big victory parade. After it was all over, the thousands of people walking back to their cars were of course very happy, but it was pretty laid back and casual.

A good chunk of the crowd had to funnel down a certain main drag, and that's where all the local news channels were lined up on either side, doing periodic live feeds of the event. People who wanted to be be on t.v. would mill about their chosen satellite truck, and patiently wait. When it got close to air time the sports guy would rally everyone in close together, show them what the "live" signal was, and when it was given that was their cue to go bananas in celebration.

It was quite something to watch the process, from subdued, to yelling, screaming, and jumping up and down in an instant. But only for maybe 30 seconds or so, as the sports caster marveled at the intensity and energy of the excited fans. (LOL)

What was most interesting though was watching it that evening on the news. If you hadn't actually been there, you would have had the impression that the entire downtown Tampa area had been one huge celebratory extravaganza, when actually it was only 20-30 people at a time, and in very short bursts at that!

A finely zoomed camera can make a small crowd look like they're everywhere, and showing no signs of letting up.

[Flowerpunkchip]

all text you read below is copied and pasted from the website below
http://www.whale.to/c/evening.html
The Evening Standard Doctored Photos
2003
http://www.whale.to/c/o67g8a0oxxx.jpg

http://www.whale.to/c/og2651opiii.jpg

Evening Standard Finally Admits Using Faked Photos

Tuesday July 29, 2003
London’s Evening Standard has admitted to having doctored photos of Iraqi’s jubilantly greeting US forces as they entered Baghdad. The photo in question appeared on the front page of the Evening Standard on Wednesday, April 9th. However, the Evening Standard only acknowledged using doctored images on Thursday July 24, and even then its acknowledgement was buried in small print on page 18. Worse still, it didn’t even apologise for having presented readers with faked images. Instead, it blandly assures them that: “some extra people were added to the image in order to fill the space left by the removal of logos from the picture. In our opinion this did not alter the clarity of truth of the picture's message but we are happy to make this clear.”
http://www.whale.to/c/evenin9.gif
Right. So this was all done in the pursuit of the truth.

But as one reader wrote in to us: “If the Evening Standard will provide the original unaltered image capture perhaps we can see this 'clarity of truth' for ourselves. Until then I will believe that they have manipulated this image to generate the acceptance of a lie.”

[WhiteFeather]

The Lamestream Corporate NewsClowns of CNN were at it again as they fake a report whilst actually reporting in the same parking lot.
NEWSCLOWN -Nancy Grace and NEWSCLOWN-Ashleigh Banfield keep a straight face , only standing within 50 feet of each other while faking a satellite interview.....Keep your eyes on the cars in the background.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5TyDHiITq1M&feature=player_embedded



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YfCJ1qLdTGM

[Twinsel]

Lol, if there's a newspaper it can't be trusted over here in the Netherlands, then it's 'de telegraaf'.
MSM are tools for those who forcing there agenda up to humankind.

[778 neighbour of some guy]

A Dutch mainstream newspaper now dares to publish an article like this (criticizing other MSM):

http://www.telegraaf.nl/tv/opmerkelijk/21548136/__CNN_nept_kijkers__.html (link contains English spoken video)


CNN is caught red-handed. It looks like the ladies have contact through a satellite connection, but in reality they are in the same parking lot.

Search for "cnn fake news gulf war" on YouTube and you will find earlier proof.
In the nineties we believed all this stuff. Now in hindsight it looks hilarious.

That newspaper is the most stupid and most populist piece of crap of this country, they hand them out for free on the street, I always tell them my own lies are of a much higher standard and they can keep their paper, always good for a blank stare or baffled face.

The critizising part, they sneer at everyone who does not share their pov, and the MSM faking or lying, whats new there!

Thanks for posting anyway man, not critical at the poster, just the paper, thought you might want to know what their standards are, mainly gossip and bull droppings so toxic 3th worlders dont want to heat their meals on them when they finally dried out.

peace dude

[Operator]

Lol, if there's a newspaper it can't be trusted over here in the Netherlands, then it's 'de telegraaf'.
MSM are tools for those who forcing there agenda up to humankind.




That newspaper is the most stupid and most populist piece of crap of this country, they hand them out for free on the street, I always tell them my own lies are of a much higher standard and they can keep their paper, always good for a blank stare or baffled face.

The critizising part, they sneer at everyone who does not share their pov, and the MSM faking or lying, whats new there!

Thanks for posting anyway man, not critical at the poster, just the paper, thought you might want to know what their standards are, mainly gossip and bull droppings so toxic 3th worlders dont want to heat their meals on them when they finally dried out.

peace dude

Hi, guys.

Thanks for the comments. You are both right, I am aware of it.
I check 'De telegraaf' frequently just to see what they are 'spinning' every time and what the
public's reaction is (under 'reageer').

I still think it's remarkable that one spinning MSM accuses another one of spinning the news.

[Earth Angel]

so what would the reason be fore this ?? is it because they are so used to lying that even when there is no reason for them to deceive us they feel compelled to ?? was there a benefit to this that I am missing?? it just shows you how stupid they think we are.....

[Hervé]

[...]

I still think it's remarkable that one spinning MSM accuses another one of spinning the news.

Talking of spinning "news":

From: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/the-toy-gun-arrests-use-actors/


The toy-gun arrests use “actors” (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/the-toy-gun-arrests-use-actors/)
by Jon Rappoport, May 10, 2013, www.nomorefakenews.com (http://www.nomorefakenews.com/)

There are two ways to cast a movie. You bring in professional actors and have them read, or you go out and hire “real people” for the parts.

The second way is sometimes used for the cameos.

That’s the case with the completely insane arrests, school suspensions, and general harassment leveled at kids and parents who “are guilty of” toy guns, fingers shaped like guns, pictures of guns, guns that make bubbles.

Here’s how it works.

The networks cover these stories, and they interview people in the community who say:

“Well, I think the suspension from school was a little too harsh. Of course, Jimmy shouldn’t have brought the bubble gum gun to school, but the authorities went overboard…”

“Other children in the class were frightened and that’s not good…”

“The schools have a hard job these days, after the Newtown shooting. Everybody is on edge…”

“Mickey is a good boy. I’m sure he meant no harm with the water pistol. But bringing it to school not the thing to do…”

These are all supposed to be rational comments and reactions.

Of course, they aren’t. They’re the words of total idiots.

If Jimmy brings a screen saver of a gun to his school, SO WHAT?

If Mike has a little plastic gun that makes bubbles, SO WHAT?

Ah, but if the sane people who would come right out and say SO WHAT and get very angry about it don’t exist anymore, then where are we?

But you see, those sane people do exist. They are many of them in the communities where the lunatics in charge are pursuing this wacko agenda.

THE NETWORKS AREN’T INTERVIEWING THOSE SANE PEOPLE.

They’re not casting them in the movie called The News.

No, instead, they’re casting the idiots, as if they represent the “general opinion and feeling.”

And these are the people the country sees on the news.

After a while, most of the viewing audience accepts these selected interviewed morons as “everybody.”

If they wanted to, a news staff could find, in a town, a hundred people who would be outraged at what’s going on with toy guns. But they don’t want to.

In other words, it’s a psyop.

[...]


Full article: http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/05/10/the-toy-gun-arrests-use-actors/

[ThePythonicCow]

The Lamestream Corporate NewsClowns of CNN were at it again as they fake a report whilst actually reporting in the same parking lot.
NEWSCLOWN -Nancy Grace and NEWSCLOWN-Ashleigh Banfield keep a straight face , only standing within 50 feet of each other while faking a satellite interview.....Keep your eyes on the cars in the background.
I merged the thread started with this post, in with an earlier thread on the same topic.

[Zelig]

Jon Stewart skewers them nicely in the below video:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rUpNhv0W_J8&feature=player_embedded

[bogeyman]

Well the media plays all sorts of tricks. Here in the UK you will see sometimes a political commentator outside 10 Downing Street, which gives the impression he/she just got the information from this location when in fact they could of just been in the studio where the information originated from. Its just ploys. It makes you think about more serious manipulation done by the media, such as war zones, and selective reporting, and limited or manipulating facts for their or political ends.