How Angelina Jolie was duped by cancer doctors into self mutilation for breast cancer she never had

[Kimberley]

Another fabulous article...however the writer doesn't mention anything about the multiple cancer cures available such as MMS and Radiation Hormesis etc...

Full article found here:

http://www.naturalnews.com/040349_Angelina_Jolie_breast_cancer_surgery.html

How Angelina Jolie was duped by cancer doctors into self mutilation for breast cancer she never had.


Wednesday, May 15, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Ranger

(NaturalNews) In a New York Times op-ed explaining her decision to have both of her breasts surgically removed even though she doesn't have breast cancer, Angelina Jolie cited risk numbers as key to her decision. She said that doctors told her she had an "87% risk of breast cancer." Her solution? Undergo three months of surgical procedures and have her breasts cut out.

Problem solved, right? With her breasts removed, she says her risk of breast cancer is now reduced to a mere 5 percent. The same bizarre logic can also be applied to men who cut off their testicles to "prevent testicular cancer" or people who cut out their colons to "prevent colorectal cancer." But that would be insane, so nobody does that, because one of the most basic principles of medicine is that you don't subject patients to the considerable risks and costs of surgery and anesthesia to remove organs that have no disease!

But the really sad part about all this is that Angelina Jolie was lied to. She didn't have an 87% risk of breast cancer in the first place. All the women reading her NYT op-ed piece are also being lied to. Here's why...

[Another1]

It struck me today that the headlines on this are great marketing material ... the photos next to the story are all of this beautiful, healthy woman who has now been saved ... am just a guy here and certainly no medical specialist but damn

[Sidney]

somehow I don't believe this. Id like to see pictures for proof.

[Daughter of Time]

Apparently now she's having her ovaries removed as well!

If the double mastectomy, and the ovary removal should turn out to be true then she's a puppet who's been manipulated by the AMA and other PTB to brain wash countless women to remove their feminine organs while the medical system makes billions doing it. And does this guarantee that those women will never get cancer??? Well, we all know the answer to that!

I find it incomprehensible that someone as strong headed as Angelina would succumb to these procedures even though she has shown to be radical in many ways all her life.

This is just one more thing that shocks me on a daily basis about what is going on in the world out there while the masses buy into all the deception and no one seems to be able to do anything to stop the insanity.

[Sidney]

Could not agree more. Something stinks with this. And while I admire her humanitarian efforts, has she done any in the US? There are starving kids here too.

[Mercedes]

Years ago,I was at the edge of desperation because I still had my uterus and having had my mother and grandmother die of cervical cancer I decided to get a doctor to remove my uterus so that I could lower de odds, and then, the Gardasil vaccine came out, so I decided to as soon as available I would vaccinate my two daughters with it to also lower their odds. Turns out a very ethical doctor convinced me that I did not need to get my uterus out to lower the odds (I got angry at him) So I just left it at that. And then the Gardasil vaccines where so expensive that I was not able to give them to my daughters: I don't know who or what to thank, but thank you. And now knowing what I do it just makes sense to do and be as healthy and happy as you can so your life is what it should. What I do believe very strongly is, that cancer is got to do a lot with foregiveness, so if you've got something or someone (including yourself) you have not forgiven, you should really work on that. It is not an easy task believe me, I know, but it gets easier with time.

[Ilie Pandia]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

[bruno dante]

You gotta be kidding? This is utter insanity.

Next thing you know Brad Pitt will be having his balls removed due to some arbitrary percentage cooked up by our wonderfully idiotic health care professionals. I can already see it on the cover of People magazine: The Eunuch and his Breastless Beauty.

The thing I'm truly terrified about, as Ilie indicated above, is the market exposure. If you don't think this can become a comically tragic trend that millions of people follow, google 'religion'.

[Earth Angel]

I saw an article about a week ago featuring Kara DioGuardi (song writer and former American Idol judge) who had the double mastectomy and a complete hysterectomy and found a surrogate to have the baby she needed to complete her perfect life.....(nothing wrong with having a surrogate its just this is an expensive option not available to a majority of women and she added it like it was all easy as pie to do).......I was disgusted with the story and thought they are just normalizing this slash and burn and now its done BEFORE you actually have cancer......the new term apparently is you are a pre-vivor.......wonder what colour ribbon they will take for that one!
Now they have the sexiest woman alive (according to some) as their spokesperson ..... the number of people praising her for her bravery etc is frightening. I have three friends who have this gene, all found out after the cancer had presented itself already but all three would gladly have done with Angelina and Kara did before diagnosis......they think its wonderful that Angelina has come out with this.....Its difficult for me to even discuss this with them.

I strongly recommend people with a fear of a genetic predisposition to any disease read Dr Bruce Liptons Biology of Belief......maybe that is a good place to start before the surgery.
Also remember these women will now be on hormone pills for the rest of their lives after their hysterectomy....so big pharma will still benefit.

this whole thing reminds me of a visit to a surgeon a few years back for a very bad bout of gallstones.....by the time I had got my appt 3 months after a month of hell, I had already found chinese herbs and was feeling amazing......the surgeon recommended I get my gallbladder removed immediately and when I told her I'd like to wait as the herbs were doing a great job she said 'well western medicine has everything else beat when it comes to gallstones"............I said well if I had a headache and you cut my head off I don't think that would be the best idea we could come up with.......the arrogance! I am happy to say my gallbladder and I get along fine for the past 3 years

[RMorgan]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

Hey Ilie,

I think the key to this plot is that such "preventive" surgery is much cheaper for the state than to conduct proper cancer treatment, specially considering the new "Obamacare" rules, so, by advocating such practice, they will be actually cutting public health costs in the near future.

Next step is to convince men to remove their balls.

Anyway, honestly, I think this is one of those "Oh, I´m tired of people judging me for my beauty, like an object" traumas. She´s just trying to prove that she´s more than just a pretty girl, but she´s chosen a very disturbing way to do that.

Raf.

[Kiforall]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

And the collection of genetic data also.

[soleil]

ya now lets wait and see if there is a man out there who would be willing to cut off their balls/testicles because they want to "prevent" cancer.....

this angelina thing is just horrible....more reasons why women wouldnt/couldnt possibly breast feed their children in the future. that is just horrifying to me.

[donk]

Anyway, honestly, I think this is one of those "Oh, I´m tired of people judging me for my beauty, like an object" traumas. She´s just trying to prove that she´s more than just a pretty girl, but she´s chosen a very disturbing way to do that.

Agreed, the most beautiful (& supersweet) girl in my school had that trauma. Heh...all she did though was dread her hair up and stopped wearing makeup or nice clothes...sheesh! Surgery?? I hope they gave her a dump truck full of money for them beauties, they were worth millions and she's do good with the loot!

[avid]

gardasil = horrendous side effects. "Natural News" will help you. NEVER give up and try every alternative - including diet! Pozzi vibes to you xxx

[RunningDeer]

I strongly recommend people with a fear of a genetic predisposition to any disease read Dr Bruce Liptons Biology of Belief......maybe that is a good place to start before the surgery.


Dr Bruce Lipton with Lisa Harrison
3-rF0OHY7NI
Published on Sep 2, 2012

Bruce H. Lipton, PhD is an internationally recognised leader in bridging science and spirit. Stem cell biologist and bestselling author of 'The Biology of Belief' and 'Spontaneous Evolution'.


Dr Bruce Lipton on The Hundredth Monkey Radio March 24 2013
7uhT0XRUX6Q
Published on Mar 24, 2013

Bruce H. Lipton, PhD is an internationally recognized leader in bridging science and spirit. Stem cell biologist, bestselling author of The Biology of Belief and recipient of the 2009 Goi Peace Award, he has been a guest speaker on hundreds of TV and radio shows, as well as keynote presenter for national and international conferences.



Dr. Lipton began his scientific career as a cell biologist. He received his Ph.D. Degree from the University of Virginia at Charlottesville before joining the Department of Anatomy at the University of Wisconsin's School of Medicine in 1973. Dr. Lipton's research on muscular dystrophy, studies employing cloned human stem cells, focused upon the molecular mechanisms controlling cell behavior. An experimental tissue transplantation technique developed by Dr. Lipton and colleague Dr. Ed Schultz and published in the journal Science was subsequently employed as a novel form of human genetic engineering. http://www.brucelipton.com/

[enfoldedblue]

My mother had breast cancer 3 x, my grand-mother 2x (died from second bout), and my great Aunt 2x. In the 90's my family was used as part of the study to identify breast cancer genes. Our family was found to carry one of the most aggressive genes. I was encouraged to be tested however I chose not to. I felt like if I didn't have the gene...it would be a bit of a relief, but of course
I would still be as likely as anyone else to get some form of cancer; but if I did have it I would introduce a great element of fear into my life which I believe would ultimately contribute to the problem. As well the solutions offered by mainstream medicine didn't appeal to me in the least: tamoxifen (a very toxic drug with many side effects) for life, or a double masectomy.

Instead I decided to address my lifestyle. I have learned how to have a relatively toxin free diet, to encourage an alkaline state in my body, to avoid estrogen producing foods and to process fears and anger as they arrise.

However, this is my choice and it requires a lot of discipline and emotional bravery. I can understand that in this world where fast-food and emotional suppression are normal, the path I chose might not be obvious for many. I have seen the reality of cancer...it is really horrible and I can understand how someone might make the choices that Angelina made. I don't judge her for her decision.

[WhiteFeather]

Apparently now she's having her ovaries removed as well!

If the double mastectomy, and the ovary removal should turn out to be true then she's a puppet who's been manipulated by the AMA and other PTB to brain wash countless women to remove their feminine organs while the medical system makes billions doing it. And does this guarantee that those women will never get cancer??? Well, we all know the answer to that!

I find it incomprehensible that someone as strong headed as Angelina would succumb to these procedures even though she has shown to be radical in many ways all her life.

This is just one more thing that shocks me on a daily basis about what is going on in the world out there while the masses buy into all the deception and no one seems to be able to do anything to stop the insanity.

I totally agree with your post. And didnt they use Steve Jobs as a total smear campaign against holistics. Thats one hell of a program they started against alternative medicine ehh.

[DeDukshyn]

I've decided to remove my entire body (suicide) because my fear of life is now greater than my fear of death ... and the mass media madness put me in this state.

:P

That facetiousness aside, boobs are overrated anyway. ;)

[Earth Angel]

LOL .......that's amazing!


I've decided to remove my entire body (suicide) because my fear of life is now greater than my fear of death ... and the mass media madness put me in this state.

:P

That facetiousness aside, boobs are overrated anyway. ;)

[InCiDeR]

What did they say again back in 1980?:


Maintain humanity under 500,000,000 in perpetual balance with nature.


Well, appears easy to accomplish. We need no helping hand, we do it all by ourselves

[ghostrider]

Blabbing your medical dealings to the world , to me is the ultimate EGO ... look at me , look what I did, ain't I great ... kneel before me... I'm superior to the entire human race, I adopted a child that needed help... fear me... worship me... I'm rich, I'm a celebrity, I'm an ambassador to the United Nations, I beat cancer, I , I, Me Me me ... next she'll win the noble peace prize and write a book and be a made for TV movie, and an action figure , then comes the CD , then the summer tour, letterman, the a visit with Obama, then Oprah ... We don't even know if her cancer was real ...we all know what the media does, they say it , and the masses believe it , with no personal investigation ... so thing could be a wag of the dog ...

[xeon]

If you subscribe to the clone theory, this may not even be the real Angelina Jolie anymore. Clones dont mind doing all these things, I would gather. So long as the toxic mainstream facade or agenda is kept up and promoted, in this case, how to "deal" with cancer.

[PHARAOH]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

Hey Ilie,

I think the key to this plot is that such "preventive" surgery is much cheaper for the state than to conduct proper cancer treatment, specially considering the new "Obamacare" rules, so, by advocating such practice, they will be actually cutting public health costs in the near future.

Next step is to convince men to remove their balls.

Anyway, honestly, I think this is one of those "Oh, I´m tired of people judging me for my beauty, like an object" traumas. She´s just trying to prove that she´s more than just a pretty girl, but she´s chosen a very disturbing way to do that.

Raf.

RMorgan, if we just look at the male species of the day, they are looking and behaving more and more feminine by the day. So in a sense, this has been well under way for quite some time. We are now beginning to see this on a grand scale and will continue to see more and more as the female is now to take the place of the male. At home, work and most importantly in the "MEDIA". Men are now fashionable if they display female tendencies and behaviors. Macho men are now frowned upon, considered barbaric and to be considered a thing of the past to be mocked and discouraged. Football out, footloose in. Just look at the way young "Black" male athletes dance. We are supposed to look up to them for the strong athletic prowess however, just look at the way they dance. They are emulating homosexual tendencies and behaviors and we are to see it as cool, hip and funny. Well I for one think it is a sad "state".


:nono: :wacko: :nono:

[Prodigal Son]

It's a sorry state of affairs when the media circus becomes such a ruse that we have to question whether or not people really have cancer or had their breasts removed. Not even pictures would be proof because they can be photoshopped. It's sick, but that's the way it is. Angelina has demonstrated that she is an OWO tool, so that even if this is true we also have to question her motives for going public with this. Then, when you question these things, you come under attack as being cruel, uncaring, and even insane for "taking cheap shots" at people who are sick or in distress, "grieving" as in Sandy Hook, blah blah blah. The mind control Nazi's are quite impressively adept at dividing humanity, creating a paradigm where the dumbed-down lemmings believe that the awake ones are mentally ill and/or inhumane.

I have a very close personal friend, an ex-girlfriend, who has the same exact genetic disorder. Her mother and grandmother died from it and her sister succumbed to it last month after a 5 year battle. My friend was also told that she had an 87% chance of getting it and she also had both breasts removed last year.

I can just see this starting a trend where it becomes chic and en vogue to have your breasts removed. We could have dating websites just for these women and the men who have fetishes for it. The possibilities are endless.

At the moment, until we get things turned around, humanity is getting sicker not better.

[Ilie Pandia]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

Hey Ilie,

I think the key to this plot is that such "preventive" surgery is much cheaper for the state than to conduct proper cancer treatment, specially considering the new "Obamacare" rules, so, by advocating such practice, they will be actually cutting public health costs in the near future.

Next step is to convince men to remove their balls.

Anyway, honestly, I think this is one of those "Oh, I´m tired of people judging me for my beauty, like an object" traumas. She´s just trying to prove that she´s more than just a pretty girl, but she´s chosen a very disturbing way to do that.

Raf.

RMorgan, if we just look at the male species of the day, they are looking and behaving more and more feminine by the day. So in a sense, this has been well under way for quite some time. We are now beginning to see this on a grand scale and will continue to see more and more as the female is now to take the place of the male. At home, work and most importantly in the "MEDIA". Men are now fashionable if they display female tendencies and behaviors. Macho men are now frowned upon, considered barbaric and to be considered a thing of the past to be mocked and discouraged. Football out, footloose in. Just look at the way young "Black" male athletes dance. We are supposed to look up to them for the strong athletic prowess however, just look at the way they dance. They are emulating homosexual tendencies and behaviors and we are to see it as cool, hip and funny. Well I for one think it is a sad "state".


:nono: :wacko: :nono:

Strength of character, intelligence, an open mind and a good heart do not require a pair of balls or a lack of them. I never understood this "battle of the sexes" where one is feminine and one is masculine. As far as I am concerned, what we today consider masculine or feminine are totally arbitrary characteristics conditioned into the child from an early age. The things that truly matter have nothing to do with having one sex or the other...

So dancing... is just dancing... is moving your body, moving your energy, if you want you can harmonize yourself with another body. How can that have a sex? The fact that we associate some moves with women ('cause only women do them!) is arbitrary and a conditioned response in us.

Once at a Xmas party, one of my coworkers proved to be a very good dancer! The conclusion was that he must be gay :becky:... It's safer to conclude that with your beer stuffed in your face, rather that going on the dance floor to shake that body. :)

What I think you are observing here is a loss in strength or will, in intelligence and in self-determination. But that is happening with the women as well, not just the men. There is nothing feminine about being "fashionable", "going shopping" or knowing the latest "trend in shoes", just as is nothing masculine in "football", "speed cars", "being macho" and so on. Just follow the money... it goes into the same place. We are being conditioned from the cradle, then we are being played. I do think that there is a distinction between the feminine and masculine aspects, but what we are fed as "masculine and feminine" today, is not it! :)

[DeDukshyn]

This topic seems to be triggering a lot of defense for many different stereotypes ... interesting all the different comments this thread has brought out.

Emotional energy seems artificially high on this topic ....

[Earth Angel]

the fact is she DID NOT HAVE CANCER......she has the mutation of a gene we all carry.....which makes her predisposed to cancer.......but if you watch this brief interview with Dr Bruce Lipton you will find out why even that does not matter as much as they would like us to FEAR......



XjTXzlf4Spw

[PHARAOH]

Empowered Patient: Angelina Jolie: (or so they say...)

http://edition.cnn.com/2013/05/14/showbiz/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy/index.html

Watch the video at the top. It's just hilarious. And what do you know?... these tests and procedures are extremely expensive, and now they got a massive market exposure due to Angelina Jolie.

Hey Ilie,

I think the key to this plot is that such "preventive" surgery is much cheaper for the state than to conduct proper cancer treatment, specially considering the new "Obamacare" rules, so, by advocating such practice, they will be actually cutting public health costs in the near future.

Next step is to convince men to remove their balls.

Anyway, honestly, I think this is one of those "Oh, I´m tired of people judging me for my beauty, like an object" traumas. She´s just trying to prove that she´s more than just a pretty girl, but she´s chosen a very disturbing way to do that.

Raf.

RMorgan, if we just look at the male species of the day, they are looking and behaving more and more feminine by the day. So in a sense, this has been well under way for quite some time. We are now beginning to see this on a grand scale and will continue to see more and more as the female is now to take the place of the male. At home, work and most importantly in the "MEDIA". Men are now fashionable if they display female tendencies and behaviors. Macho men are now frowned upon, considered barbaric and to be considered a thing of the past to be mocked and discouraged. Football out, footloose in. Just look at the way young "Black" male athletes dance. We are supposed to look up to them for the strong athletic prowess however, just look at the way they dance. They are emulating homosexual tendencies and behaviors and we are to see it as cool, hip and funny. Well I for one think it is a sad "state".


:nono: :wacko: :nono:

Strength of character, intelligence, an open mind and a good heart do not require a pair of balls or a lack of them. I never understood this "battle of the sexes" where one is feminine and one is masculine. As far as I am concerned, what we today consider masculine or feminine are totally arbitrary characteristics conditioned into the child from an early age. The things that truly matter have nothing to do with having one sex or the other...

So dancing... is just dancing... is moving your body, moving your energy, if you want you can harmonize yourself with another body. How can that have a sex? The fact that we associate some moves with women ('cause only women do them!) is arbitrary and a conditioned response in us.

Once at a Xmas party, one of my coworkers proved to be a very good dancer! The conclusion was that he must be gay :becky:... It's safer to conclude that with your beer stuffed in your face, rather that going on the dance floor to shake that body. :)

What I think you are observing here is a loss in strength or will, in intelligence and in self-determination. But that is happening with the women as well, not just the men. There is nothing feminine about being "fashionable", "going shopping" or knowing the latest "trend in shoes", just as is nothing masculine in "football", "speed cars", "being macho" and so on. Just follow the money... it goes into the same place. We are being conditioned from the cradle, then we are being played. I do think that there is a distinction between the feminine and masculine aspects, but what we are fed as "masculine and feminine" today, is not it! :)


I respectfully disagree whole heartedly.

[T Smith]

Apparently now she's having her ovaries removed as well!


I find it incomprehensible that someone as strong headed as Angelina would succumb to these procedures even though she has shown to be radical in many ways all her life.

This is just one more thing that shocks me on a daily basis about what is going on in the world out there while the masses buy into all the deception and no one seems to be able to do anything to stop the insanity.

Never underestimate the power of the program conditioning were all subject to from day one in the cradle. It produces a whole lot of non-conformist conformists....

[Water33/6]

It's hard to find a man behaving in a manner that is masculine. I appreciate men who are cultured... Art, traveler, interested in the world, etc but why do these men acquire female like mannerisms? Men are being feminized.

[witchy1]

hmmmm, something is wrong with this! A bit of digging came up with this (and I think the dark side is strong in this one.)

Natural News has learned it all coincides with a well times for corporate PR campaign that has been planned for months and just happens to coincide with the upcoming US Supreme Court decision on the viability of the BRCA1 patent

.....But the smoking gun is the fact that Angelina Jolie's seemingly spontaneous announcement magically appeared on the cover of People Magazine this week -- a magazine that is usually finalized for publication three weeks before it appears on newsstands. That cover, not surprisingly, uses the same language found in the NYT op-ed piece: "HER BRAVE CHOICE" and "This was the right thing to do." The flowery, pro-choice language is not a coincidence.

What this proves is that Angelina's Jolie's announcement was a well-planned corporate P.R. campaign with carefully-crafted messages designed to influence public opinion.

But what could Jolie be seeking to influence?

2) It caused women to rush out and seek BRCA1 gene testing procedures. These tests just happen to be patented by a for-profit corporation called "Myriad Genetics." Because of this patent, BRCA1 tests can cost $3,000 - $4,000 each. The testing alone is a multi-billion-dollar market, but only if the patent is upheld in an upcoming Supreme Court decision
(Yes their stocks went up)

Please read the link it includes the rights of corporations to patent (own) genes and thereby stop any one else from looking at them.

The probability facts she cites are ridiculous and what surgeon would remove both breasts on the off chance. There are plenty of other non invasive tests you can have to see if might get cancer: http://www.cancure.org/tests_to_detect_cancer.htm

http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TVXAcKN0

I think this all coincides with a sneaky desire for a breast reduction coz they got saggy (she now has implants) and she is getting paid mega bucks to spin the BRC1 gene threat fear factor!

[DNA]

My mother had breast cancer 3 x, my grand-mother 2x (died from second bout), and my great Aunt 2x. In the 90's my family was used as part of the study to identify breast cancer genes. Our family was found to carry one of the most aggressive genes. I was encouraged to be tested however I chose not to. I felt like if I didn't have the gene...it would be a bit of a relief, but of course
I would still be as likely as anyone else to get some form of cancer; but if I did have it I would introduce a great element of fear into my life which I believe would ultimately contribute to the problem. As well the solutions offered by mainstream medicine didn't appeal to me in the least: tamoxifen (a very toxic drug with many side effects) for life, or a double masectomy.

Instead I decided to address my lifestyle. I have learned how to have a relatively toxin free diet, to encourage an alkaline state in my body, to avoid estrogen producing foods and to process fears and anger as they arrise.

However, this is my choice and it requires a lot of discipline and emotional bravery. I can understand that in this world where fast-food and emotional suppression are normal, the path I chose might not be obvious for many. I have seen the reality of cancer...it is really horrible and I can understand how someone might make the choices that Angelina made. I don't judge her for her decision.

From what I've heard Jolie's mother died of breast cancer. Thank You EnfoldedBlue for your sharing. Very powerfull.
I will not judge Jolie either

[Earth Angel]

Angelina is on the cover of People magazine this week.....which usually takes 3 weeks but for a story this big I guess they bumped who ever for this major breaking news story!

EXPOSED: Angelina Jolie part of a clever corporate scheme to protect billions in BRCA gene patents, influence Supreme Court decision (opinion)

Learn more: http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html#ixzz2TZHcjdu7

[frozen alchemy]

As someone who was just diagnosed a few months ago with a small lump of cancer and decided to have a lumpectomy but not the recommended followup radiation and five years of aromatase inhibitors to knock down my estrogen levels to nothing (because it was Estrogen Receptor positive, which means the cancer is encouraged by the hormone levels), I can tell you that it is NOT as simple as you're making it out to be. I had no family history, and if I had seen a relative die after undergoing years of toxic treatments, I'd be wanting to avoid all that crap too.

The truth is, we may all be getting cancers all the time, but our immune systems may be fighting them off. Or not. The only way you know is if there's a diagnosis, a lump or god forbid something else, like a tumor in your skull or pancreas or bones. Breasts are easy enough to part with, especially compared to the alternative and Jolie is right in figuring it's easier to get rid of the TISSUE YOU ARE NOT USING rather than wait for it perhaps to become malignant and spread to your lymph nodes and from there to wherever in your body before you're even aware of it. This is not an issue of 'if I live healthy enough I'll dodge it' because you can't know that. Plenty of vegan marathoners end up with cancer, too, often a highly advanced stage which is difficult to treat.

Let's face it, we wouldn't be having this highly emotional subject conversation if it weren't for the adolescent male fascination with titties (one idiot said that Jolie was 'dead to him now' as if his fantasies are now crushed, as if she was supposed to make her personal health decisions based on what some AH fan is thinking...) and our also disgusting celebrity hero worship mentality.

Would we be having this discussion if Jolie was an average looking non-actress with an average body who decided to have her gallbladder removed because she felt she had an increased chance of gallbladder cancer, after watching a relative die painfully of the disease?

Get a grip people; it's her decision and her decision alone. I applaud her honesty in discussing it in public. If you think you can dodge this disease by 'healthy living' when the entire planet is awash with toxins, or want to put up with chemo and radiation to treat it at some point, feel free. She's trying to avoid that and I can't blame her.

[Daughter of Time]

I have just received an invitation via "Causes" asking me if I would like to take the BRCA genetic test, like Angelina did, to see what my chances of getting breast cancer are!

The caption reads: "Support Angelina" And then it gives all the scary details about chances of survival if the test is positive.

[wolf_rt]

It's her body and she can mutilate it as she sees fit.

Personally I think boobs are great!
As are all the other parts of the body that allows us to experience this existence.

there is probably some occult benefit to scaring someone into hacking part of there body off.

[Daughter of Time]

Article from "Natural News" about men removing their prostate now because of the BRCA gene.

It was already predicted in this thread!

http://www.naturalnews.com/040401_prostate_removal_BRCA_genes_Angelina_Jolie.html

[Earth Angel]

the new information on the company that has the world rights to test for this gene show us once again this is not about Cancer awareness or finding a cure this is showing us more than ever this is about keeping the CANCER INDUSTRY alive



… a leading molecular diagnostic company dedicated to making a difference in patient’s lives through the discovery and commercialization of transformative tests to assess a person’s risk of developing disease, guide treatment decisions and assess risk of disease progression and recurrence. With fiscal year 2011 revenue of over $400 million and more than 1,100 employees, Myriad is working on strategic directives, including new test introductions, companion diagnostics, and international expansion to take advantage of significant growth opportunities that further the Company’s mission.”


What Angelina Jolie didn’t tell you is that she and I have something in common. Each of us is intimately involved with Myriad Genetics. In fact, we belong to Myriad. When the staff of the USPTO approved Myriad’s application for a patent on on the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes, they essentially allowed Myriad Genetics to claim ownership of, and exclusive rights to, my genetic material - and Angelina Jolie’s.

http://www.worldirish.com/story/40632-what-angelina-jolie-didnt-tell-us-about-her-genes-

[The Truth Is In There]

human stupidity knows no bounds. amputating some body part that may or may not get cancerous at some point is like convicting somebody of a crime he may or may not commit just because his father did the same. i wonder what's next...

[grannyfranny100]

Here is Dr. Mercola's take on the Jolie's story; a thoughtful, in depth analysis of the science, patenting and marketing. http://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/05/27/angelina-jolie-double-mastectomy.aspx?e_cid=20130527_DNL_ProdTest1_art_1&utm_source=dnl&utm_medium=email&utm_content=art1&utm_campaign=20130527ProdTest1

This covers
Why Does US Recommendations Place Women with Gene Defects at Even Greater Risk?
Genetic Defects Are Not a Major Contributor to Breast Cancer
What Do Gene Patents Have to Do with It?
It’s Starting to Look Like a Coordinated Yet Cleverly Designed PR Campaign...
GMO Opponents Are 'Elitist' and Insensitive to World’s Needs, Monsanto CEO Says
The Angelina Effect—Don’t Be Swayed...
Nearly Every Part of the Human Genome Is Now Owned by Corporations
Tissue Trauma and Surgery Can Actually Increase Your Risk of Cancer
Epigenetics—The Answer for Those Seeking Cancer Prevention
Physician Discovers What It’s Like to Be 'Sold' Preventive Mastectomy
The Case Against BRCA Testing
Breast Cancer Prevention Strategies

[Earth Angel]

Angelina's aunt (her mothers sister) has just died of breast cancer......this will no doubt feed the story some more, and for many be enough to support her decision.
I am happy to see Mercola come out against her choice.

I also see Brad has 'face blindness' (the inability to recall a face of someone you have previously met) ........perhaps he should have his eyeballs removed before he goes completely blind

[soleil]

Angelina's aunt (her mothers sister) has just died of breast cancer......this will no doubt feed the story some more, and for many be enough to support her decision.
I am happy to see Mercola come out against her choice.

I also see Brad has 'face blindness' (the inability to recall a face of someone you have previously met) ........perhaps he should have his eyeballs removed before he goes completely blind

i JUST saw this on the news and snorted laughter to myself. i dont believe any of it(angelina's bravery etc), so excuse me while i say - what a joke.

[Anchor]

I liked what Melissa Etheridge said about the whole thing - also in the MSM which is interesting -

Jolie's mastectomy was 'fearful' not 'brave'


"My belief is that cancer comes from inside you, and so much of it has to do with the environment of your body. It's the stress that will turn that gene on or not. Plenty of people have the gene mutation and everything, but it never comes to cancer," she continued, noting that surgical removal of one's breasts is "way down the line on the spectrum of what you can do" to lessen your risk of the disease.

"I've been cancer free for nine years now, and looking back, I completely understand why I got cancer," she added. "There was so much acidity in everything. I really encourage people to go a lot longer and further before coming to that conclusion [of a mastectomy]."

Regardless of Etheridge's views on the matter, Jolie's announcement has had one undeniably positive repercussion: there has been a massive increase in the number of women ringing help lines for advice on breast cancer. So much so that they have termed it the "Angelina effect".

http://www.dailylife.com.au/health-and-fitness/dl-wellbeing/melissa-etheridge-jolies-mastectomy-was-fearful-not-brave-20130618-2of2c.html

[jackovesk]

http://wtxf.images.worldnow.com/images/22245985_BG1.jpg

Natural News challenges Angelina Jolie to (Denounce Corporate Patents) on (Human Genes)..!

Friday, May 17, 2013
by Mike Adams, the Health Rang

(NaturalNews) Following recent revelations of how Angelina Jolie's double mastectomy P.R. stunt feeds into the profits of the trillion dollar industry (http://www.naturalnews.com/040365_Angelina_Jolie_gene_patents_Supreme_Court_decision.html) which claims to own human genes, Natural News is now calling on Jolie to publicly denounce patents on human genes, including the BRCA1 and BRCA2 genes she has now made famous.

Does Angelina Jolie really stand up for women and human rights? Or is she a corporate sellout who corrals women into the for-profit cancer industry that claims ownership over the genetic code of all women?

FACTS:




• The BRCA1 gene for breast cancer is patented by a corporation called Myriad Genetics. All patents are government-enforced monopolies over intellectual property, and they thus prevent anyone else from conducting research or testing on the BRCA1 gene without paying huge royalties to Myriad. This is why the BRCA detection tests cost $3,000 - $4,000 each.

• Angelina Jolie's announcement of a double mastectomy even though she had no breast cancer caused the stock price of Myriad to skyrocket to a 52-week high. Whether she intended it or not, her advocacy of double mastectomies is causing market values to sharply rise in the human genomics industry, where corporations own patents on human genes.

• Obamacare mandates that, over the next few years, taxpayers start paying for BRCA1 gene testing. This will be a direct transfer of money from taxpayers to the corporations that "own" the human genes being tested.

• An imminent Supreme Court decision could make or break the human gene testing industry. Trillions of dollars are at stake. If the Supreme Court rules against corporate patents on human genes, BRCA1 testing will become amazingly affordable (in the $100 range), thereby denying billions of dollars in profits to gene patent holders.

With all this in mind, we now ask Angelina Jolie: Will you now denounce corporate ownership over human genes?

Anyone who supports corporate ownership of genes must also love Monsanto..!

Monsanto is widely regarded as the "most evil corporation" on the planet. And why? Because it claims intellectual property ownership over the genetic code of seeds it sells to farmers. If Monsanto gets its ultimate wish, anyone who wants to grow food anywhere in the world will have to pay a royalty to Monsanto.

Companies that "own" patents on human genes have a similar aim. They want every living human being to pay them royalties any time they run a test on a specific gene. In the same way that a farmer doesn't have the right to grow food without paying royalties to the corporations, anyone who wants to test their genetic code for possible risk factors for disease will be required to pay exorbitant, monopoly-priced royalties to the gene corporations.

By nearly all standards of human rights, these practices are considered "evil." Patenting seeds and genes is a violation of nature, most people agree. The very idea of patenting a human gene is ludicrous from the outset. How can a corporation claim to have invented something that has already existed in the human genome for hundreds of thousands of years? The BRCA gene existed long before Myriad Genetics even came into existence. So how can Myriad "own" the BRCA genes?

Hence the lunacy of the BRCA gene patents as well as Angelina Jolie's support of them. By terrifying women all across the country, Jolie is leading them straight into the hands of the for-profit cancer industry which already claims to own part of the genetic code of all women.

This is a violation of nature. It is a violation of human rights, women's rights and reproductive rights. If Angelina Jolie really wants to prove she supports women, she must denounce corporate ownership of human genes. Failure to do that is nothing short of an open admission that she is working for corporate monopolists who seek to dominate women with intellectual property patents on human genes.

The issue of corporate patents on human genes really is black and white: You're either for humanity, or you're a corporate whore
There's no middle ground on this issue of corporations being granted patents over human genes. If you're against Monsanto, you're against corporations owning your genes, too.

If you believe in human rights and women's reproductive rights, then you have to believe that your genetic code belongs to you and your children, not to a bunch of financial investors and corporate monopolists.

Having children means replicating your genetic code, and the way today's patent laws are written, anyone who has a child with the BRCA gene mutation is technically in violation of U.S. patent laws and must pay a royalty to Myriad Genetics for each child born with the mutation. But you can't even find out if your child has the mutation unless you pay Myriad a huge fee just for the "right" to examine your own genes. That's a form of "genetic enslavement," and Angelina Jolie seems to be wholly supporting it.

Remember: The patenting of human genes is a violation of nature and universal justice. No person is truly free if powerful, billion-dollar corporations can claim ownership over their genetic code. Yet Jolie has never spoken out against this exploitation of women. Will she now?

I ask the question again: Is Angelina Jolie a corporate sellout, or a true humanitarian? Will she denounce the corporate ownership of human genes, or will she remain silent and continue to mislead women into unwittingly being victimized and exploited by for-profit corporations?

Join us in demanding Angelina Jolie denounce corporate patents on human genes
Go to these Facebook pages and post the following question: Will you denounce corporate patents on human genes?

The Brad Pitt and Angelina Jolie FB page:
http://www.facebook.com/BradPittAngelinaJolie

The official Angelina Jolie fan page:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Angelina-Jolie-Official-Fan-Page/197814...

The Angelina Jolie page:
http://www.facebook.com/pages/Angelina-Jolie/127098593969621

Demand a straight answer from her on this issue: Is she a corporate sellout? Does she actually believe in women's reproductive rights, or is she really just an actor playing the role of someone who creates the illusion of caring about women's human rights?

Is Angelina Jolie a Corporate Monopolistic sellout?

For the record, my own position on this has always been clear and consistent:

• I am OPPOSED to corporations patenting food seeds and engineering GMOs.

• I am OPPOSED to corporations patenting human genes.

• I am OPPOSED to corporations patenting pharmacological medicines based on stealing molecules from nature (biopiracy).

Is Angelina Jolie opposed to any of these? I think not. From what I can tell so far, she is a pro-GMO, pro-Monsanto, pro-monopoly, pro-patent, pro-Big Pharma, pro-corporation sellout. And this means she is anti-humanitarian, anti-women, anti-freedom, anti-open source, anti-family and anti-reproductive rights.

If I'm wrong about any of this, let Angelina say so herself. Let her come out and admit in her own words what she really believes instead of hiding behind corporate P.R. spin and media propaganda campaigns that are obviously crafted and timed to manipulate public opinion.

If Jolie actually comes out and denounces corporate ownership over human genes, and does so publicly and unambiguously in a large media outlet like the NYT, I will retract these articles and publicly applaud her for actually doing something courageous and meaningful. But don't hold your breath... there's virtually no chance Jolie actually believes in women's freedom, reproductive freedom and the sanctity of nature's seeds.

Because Angelina Jolie is a fake. She's an actor performing a script, and the script is written entirely by business interests who seek to imprison and dominate all humans by exercising total control over their genetic code. Jolie is just their pretty-faced puppet, and the corporations are the ones pulling all the strings.

http://wac.naturalnews.tv/9082-1.jpg

http://www.naturalnews.com/040366_angelina_jolie_gene_patents_brca.html

PS - To all you women out there, simply start educating yourself on healthy nutrition and a regular doses of natural vitamin (D) from the sun...:yes4: