Rupert Sheldrake

[Swami]

Rupert Sheldrake - The Morphogenetic Universe


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SJCHBwhBE3g

[ExomatrixTV]

QsJtUJ_YgZQ

~science fun: http://goo.gl/NsLmp (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_unsolved_problems_in_physics) ~tips: http://sheldrake.org/Onlineexp/portal/ & http://brucelipton.com

Dr. Alfred Rupert Sheldrake (born 28 June 1942) is an English scientist and author. He is known for having proposed a non-genetic account of morphogenesis and for his research into parapsychology. His books and papers stem from his theory of morphic resonance, and cover topics such as animal and plant development and behaviour, memory, telepathy, perception and cognition in general. His publications include A New Science of Life (1981), Seven Experiments That Could Change the World (1995), Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home (1999), The Sense of Being Stared At (2003), and The Science Delusion: Freeing the spirit of inquiry (2012).

Seven Experiments That Could Change the World:

In 1994 Dr. Sheldrake proposed a list of Seven Experiments That Could Change the World, which included, among other things, the seed of his study of Dogs that Know When Their Owners are Coming Home (1999). In Seven Experiments ... he encouraged lay people to contribute to scientific research, and argued that scientific experiments similar to his own could be conducted on a shoestring budget.

The Sense of Being Stared At

In 2003, Dr. Sheldrake published The Sense of Being Stared At on the psychic staring effect, including an experiment where blindfolded subjects guessed whether persons were staring at them or at another target. He reported that, in tens of thousands of trials, 60% of subjects reported being stared at when being stared at; 50% of subjects reported being stared at when they were not being stared at. According to Dr. Sheldrake, this suggested a weak sense of being stared at but no sense of not being stared at. He also claimed that these experiments were widely repeated, in schools in Connecticut and Toronto and a science museum in Amsterdam, with consistent results.

~source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Rupert_Sheldrake

Academic Work

Dr. Bruce Lipton taught in 1973 anatomy as an Assistant Professor at the University of Wisconsin School Of Medicine before coming to St. George's University School of Medicine, where he became a Professor of Anatomy for 3 years. From 1987 to 1992 he was involved in research at Penn State and Stanford University Medical Center. Since 1993 he has been teaching in non-tenure positions at different universities.[3] His publications consist mainly of research on the development of muscle cells.
Books

2005: The Biology of Belief -- Unleashing the Power of Consciousness, Matter & Miracles
2006: The Wisdom of Your Cells - How Your Beliefs Control Your Biology
2009: Spontaneous Evolution: Our Positive Future and a Way to Get There from Here (co-authored with Steve Bhaerman).

~source: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Bruce_Lipton

[STATIC]

I have just recently discovered these guys and am enjoying there interviews. In this video Biologist & Writer Dr. Rupert Sheldrake speaks about morphic resonance and the science delusion.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OqaATPAnTZQ&feature=plcp

Also here is Sheldrake's website where you can find several books he has written.
http://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html

[STATIC]

"doctor Sheldrake I presume" That cracked me up. What an interesting fellow. I'm going to order his book Science Set Free
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uD2qScZlvYE

[mahalall]

Thanks Static,

charming eloquence

http://www.sheldrake.org/Trialogues/characters.mp3

[write4change]

Thanks Static,

charming eloquence

http://www.sheldrake.org/Trialogues/characters.mp3

Thank you for posting this. A very good way to start the day. I keep thinking I have heard all of Terrence but people keep finding more and more of his wisdom to post. And it is always a pleasure to hear something new.

[Star Tsar]

Never seen this show before thankyou for bringing it to my awareness Static!

:)

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Thanks to Static !!!

Description: In this video, British biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, one of the world's most innovative scientists, describes how science is being constricted by unexamined assumptions that have hardened into dogmas*. These dogmas not only put arbitrary limits on the depth and scope of science, but may well be dangerous for the future of humanity.

According to these dogmas, all of reality is material or physical; the world is an inanimate machine; nature is purposeless; free will is an illusion; notions of higher orders of consciousness and absolute ("God") awareness exist only as ideas in human minds, which are themselves nothing but electrochemical processes imprisoned within our skulls.

So Dr. Sheldrake asks: should science be an ideology or belief system, or should it reclaim its birthright as an unbiased, open-ended method of inquiry? In his latest book, SCIENCE SET FREE, he argues that the materialist ideology is moribund; under its sway, increasingly expensive research is reaping diminishing returns while societies around the world are paying the price. In the skeptical spirit of true science, SCIENCE SET FREE turns ten fundamental dogmas of materialist science into exciting questions, and shows how all of them open up startling new possibilities for discovery. This book may well challenge your view of what is real and what is possible.

Dr. Rupert Sheldrake is the author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books, and is best known for his groundbreaking theory of morphic resonance. (For his full biography and more information on his work, seehttp://www.sheldrake.org/homepage.html ). In this video, recorded in San Francisco on Sept. 7, 2012, Dr. Sheldrake speaks about his new book and answers audience questions at a presention sponsored by the California Institute of Integral Studies (http://ciis.org) and held at the First Unitarian Universalist Church in San Francisco.

UPccMlgug8A

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Terence McKenna, Rupert Sheldrake, Ralph Abraham - "Metamorphosis" (1995)


lYOC_IFmWzE

[Star Tsar]

I found a trialogue about Crop Circles!
Terence McKenna, Rupert Sheldrake & Ralph Abraham from 1991.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7OPOJU9e3jQ



21 years ago how time flys.


:cool:

[Corncrake]

A recent and important article by Rupert Sheldrake on 'Why bad science is like bad religion' writing in his blog for the Huffington Post which may be of interest:

I have been a scientist for more than 40 years, having studied at Cambridge and Harvard. I researched and taught at Cambridge University, was a research fellow of the Royal Society, and have more than 80 publications in peer-reviewed journals. I am strongly pro-science. But I am more and more convinced that that the spirit of free inquiry is being repressed within the scientific community by fear-based conformity. Institutional science is being crippled by dogmas and taboos. Increasingly expensive research is yielding diminishing returns.

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/dr-rupert-sheldrake/why-bad-science-is-like-bad-religion_b_2200597.html

[write4change]

Sheldrake's quote needs to be made on plaques that people can buy. Something not to be forgotten.

[genevieve]

665 plumber of the beast--

Thanks for this very interesting video. Sheldrake rocks!

Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
Genevieve

[modwiz]

Before the Renaissance he would have been burned at the stake for his heresies. I am glad we are not experiencing those times in this particular consensus reality.

Sheldrake has been a bright light in science for decades now. The mainstream keeps him hidden under a bed.

[Cidersomerset]

mtPuKSwP1mo



Rupert Sheldrake - Richard Dawkins comes to call



Saturday, 17 August 2013 10:54
David Icke.


Richard Dawkins - the pseudoscientist so desperate to undermine those that
disagree with his almost child-like devotion to the song-sheet orthodoxy of
mainstream 'science'.



http://www.davidicke.com/images/stories/August201392/528307_10200159779178757_233390223_n.jpg

[araucaria]

Wonderful - Rupert Sheldrake is one of the very best.

[onawah]

From post #81 here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?60288-Videos-from-Forbidden-Knowledge&p=716028#post716028
Banned TEDTalk: The Science Delusion - Rupert Sheldrake
Quote TED's Chris Anderson censored
Rupert Sheldrake, along with
Graham Hancock, and removed
this video and Hancock's from the
TEDx YouTube channel. They dared
question the Scientistic Orthodoxy,
and for that they have been publicly
castigated and defamed.

Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D. is a biologist
and author of more than 80 scientific
papers and ten books. A former
Research Fellow of the Royal Society,
he studied natural sciences at Cambridge
University, where he was a Scholar of
Clare College, took a double first class
honors degree and was awarded the
University Botany Prize.

He then studied philosophy and history
of science at Harvard University, where
he was a Frank Knox Fellow, before
returning to Cambridge, where he took a
Ph.D. in biochemistry.

He lives in London with his wife Jill Purce
and two sons.

He has appeared in many TV programs
in Britain and overseas. He has written for
newspapers such as the Guardian, where
he had a regular monthly column, The
Times, Sunday Telegraph, Daily Mirror,
Daily Mail, Sunday Times, Times
Educational Supplement, Times Higher
Education Supplement and Times Literary
Supplement, and has contributed to a variety
of magazines, including New Scientist,
Resurgence, the Ecologist and the Spectator.

Video (about 18 mins):

1TerTgDEgUE


http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/23415.html

[araucaria]

Video (about 18 mins):

1TerTgDEgUE


http://www.ForbiddenKnowledgeTV.com/page/23415.html

Thanks Onawah. A few thoughts on that video.

Fudging is called by the fudgers ‘intellectual phase locking’! Does this interesting phrase describe an insidious form of morphic resonance?

Materialistic medicine is forced to rely on the placebo effect to classify phenomena that are unexplained, being non-material. The placebo effect is the Trojan Horse of materialistic medicine, it shouldn’t exist at all.

Rupert Sheldrake mentions his great friendship with Terence McKenna, which may come as a surprise to some who have little time for Terence McKenna. McKenna answered a question on their relationship as follows (in The Archaic Revival):

Q. Rupert Sheldrake’s morphic resonance, Ralph Abraham’s chaos theory, and your timewave model all appear to contain complementary patterns that operate on similar underlying principles–that energy systems store information until a certain level is reached and the information is then transduced into a larger frame of reference, like water in a tiered fountain. Have you worked these theories into an all-encompassing metatheory of how the universe functions and operates?
A. No, but we’re working on it. Well, it is true that the three of us–and I would add Frank Barr in there, who is less well known but has a piece of the puzzle as well–we’re all complementary. Rupert’s theory is, at this point, a hypothesis. There are no equations, there’s no predictive machinery; it’s a way of speaking about experimental approaches. My timewave theory is like an extremely formal and specific example of what he’s talking about in a general way. And then what Ralph’s doing is providing a bridge from the kind of things Rupert and I are doing back into the frontier branch of ordinary mathematics called dynamic modeling. And Frank is an expert in the repetition of fractal process. He can show you the same thing happening on many many levels, in many different expressions. So I have named us Compressionists, or Psychedelic Compressionists. Compressionism holds that the world is growing more and more complex, compressed, knitted together, and therefore holographically complete at every point, and that’s basically where the four of us stand, I think, but from different points of view.

[onawah]

More on this subject from Carmody in post #296 here:
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?17872-The-Question-of-Lithium--Alchemy-dimensions-shapeshifters-aliens-existence-reality..-&p=716534#post716534

[Carmody]

In one of the examples that Rupert shows in the above video, he speaks on the idea that the brain may not be the only place where mind and..memory exist.

Now we have this appearing:

Flatworms lose their heads but not their memories: Study finds memories stored outside the brain

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-flatworms-memories-brain.html

[araucaria]

In one of the examples that Rupert shows in the above video, he speaks on the idea that the brain may not be the only place where mind and..memory exist.

Now we have this appearing:

Flatworms lose their heads but not their memories: Study finds memories stored outside the brain

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-flatworms-memories-brain.html
Then you have the hydrocephalic mathematics graduate from Cambridge University whose brain box was full of water. It is mentioned by various authors, notably in a book called Half a Brain. If I had half a brain myself, I would know where I put it :)

Also Jeremy Narby, in Intelligence in Nature, looks at animals with no brains, and plants that behave like brains, with proteins transmitting information through the plant.

[Carmody]

In one of the examples that Rupert shows in the above video, he speaks on the idea that the brain may not be the only place where mind and..memory exist.

Now we have this appearing:

Flatworms lose their heads but not their memories: Study finds memories stored outside the brain

http://phys.org/news/2013-08-flatworms-memories-brain.html
Then you have the hydrocephalic mathematics graduate from Cambridge University whose brain box was full of water. It is mentioned by various authors, notably in a book called Half a Brain. If I had half a brain myself, I would know where I put it :)

Also Jeremy Narby, in Intelligence in Nature, looks at animals with no brains, and plants that behave like brains, with proteins transmitting information through the plant.

It is this kind of REAL and Actual outlier that wreaks total havoc with the ideas of what reality and nature actually are.

And that the scientific establishment and that of religion, corporate, politics and finance do NOT want people even begin looking at such things.

All it takes is for the bucket to have one hole, and the entire contents leak out. All it takes is for ONE story of a UFO to be real, and all of it comes in.

This sort of thing happens all the time, thus....all bets are off.

It takes all of science and reality as people know it .... and brings it right down to the killing floor.

What this head full of cranial fluid and no brain means to the scientist, is that...everything, everything, everything the scientist understands as reality -is shattered. All of it is broken. ALL. (all the scientist has to do, is begin the process of thinking about what this sort of situation means. When they do, the dominoes cascade and it all comes down.)

Yet this case of the one person is not unique. There are others who have been found with the same condition.

The foolish will turn from this and concentrate on holding their precious self lie together.... and the intrepid will run into that gap, full of opening and expectation.

Choose wisely.

Mind boggling levels of cognitive dissonance and mental phase lock are require to hold the self lie. Off the scale.

[ulli]

When faced with what to study after high school, and getting nudged in the direction of science, I recoiled in horror...the little bit I had seen, and the scientists I had met were enough to put me off such an idea for life.
And not because the science world was boring, as other students thought....
not at all, but because it was full of dogma, of arrogance, of oneupmanship, far more so than the art and fashion world which I later entered, and which I never regretted. Because designing something practical to wear gets to the core of someone's identity search much better than looking at and measuring the building blocks of our universe.
Fashion at least allows for consciousness to exist, when science to this day does not.

So my conclusion is that the reluctance of scientists to study the human being, or even to call psychology a pseudo science,
has to do directly with the fear of the self, with self hatred, and until this blockage is recognized as the core problem of the science world, and efforts are made to overcome these psychotic self denial issues, there will be no turn around for humanity.
Meanwhile I urge parents to send their kids to art schools, at least for one year, as that will help them decide what direction to take later on.

[araucaria]

Meanwhile I urge parents to send their kids to art schools, at least for one year, as that will help them decide what direction to take later on.
Unsurprisingly, there is a gender issue here too. Historically, arts faculties have been full of girls, and science faculties have had very few. Getting men into the arts may help the men, and getting women into science may help science. Fortunately things have been improving in recent years.

[Wind]

http://i.imgur.com/fkJlS.jpg.jpg

[Chester]

Rupert Sheldrake and Dogmatism in Mainstream Science
Rolf Sattler


If we value the pursuit of knowledge, we must be free to follow wherever that search may take us” (Adlai Stevenson)

Read it here (http://www.integralworld.net/sattler7.html)

[Frederick Jackson]

Excellent paper, well worth the read. Thanks. The phrase "materialism and mechanism" reminds me of W.R. Reich´s complaint about modern science as "mechano-mystical". Unfortunately I believe many of Reich's heirs have become dogmatic and fallen exactly into the trap of "mechano-mystical" thinking.

[Chester]

Excellent paper, well worth the read. Thanks. The phrase "materialism and mechanism" reminds me of W.R. Reich´s complaint about modern science as "mechano-mystical". Unfortunately I believe many of Reich's heirs have become dogmatic and fallen exactly into the trap of "mechano-mystical" thinking.

What I find most interesting is that we human beings appear to follow this same type of pattern regarding any formed pathway whether it may be science or religion or politics or philosophy and on and on. I see this has been my own MO most of my life.

That I have now discovered this habit of mine, missing the massive assumptions I have accepted because I never allow them to arise within my conscious mind, I am now seeing this in just about everyone I interact with.

I then find myself saying... "ah, but your premise requires this assumption"... and I lay that assumption out. Almost without exception, the response is usually, "Well of course that's true (dummy)" and at that moment, all communication has ended and all that follows is argument and/or one party walks away. What I also experience is that almost all the time I here that response, "Of course (dummy), I sense they actually had never actually explored for themselves if the required assumption could be true or not (for them) and that their answer was simply a reaction of their ego. An ego (which is an illusion) protecting an illusion (the false assumption) so that the primary illusion (the ego) is protected.

It seems to me that if a portion of humanity has transcended much of this dynamic, the natural course for that portion would be the forming of their own, separate society. Perhaps this is the position Earth happens to find itself now.

[Referee]

This book looks like a good read and has my interest, as we all unlock the doors of science.

A nice overview by the Author. He challenges the ten dogmas of science and turns them into questions.

WEAL-ke0-Bs

[araucaria]

Yes, Sheldrake's writing is as readable as his speaking is listenable-to. Thoroughly recommended.

[mosquito]

There are some teachers from the UK visiting our school next week, and I've asked if someone could bring this book for me. Fingers crossed !!

I'm hoping it will be as good a read as Richard Dawkins' book, for which it should be an excellent counterbalance.

[STR]

Wonderful talk! Thanks
STR

[Muzz]

Thanks Ref. I thought it very interesting that his TED talk was pulled. Although this may have backfired on them -

Ideas Worth Suppressing: Psi Wars and TED's Worst Nightmare (http://www.opednews.com/articles/1/Ideas-Worth-Suppressing-P-by-Meryl-Ann-Butler-Corrupt-Science_Materialism_Protest_Science-140327-43.html)

[ViralSpiral]

Dr. Rupert Sheldrake talks about his banned TED talk on Skeptiko with Alex Tsakiris 02/04/2013


kAuxXvNVhgA

[genevieve]

Thank you, Referee!

Sheldrake is not only brilliant but also understandable. What a combo!


Peace Love Joy & Harmony,
genevieve

[STR]

There are some teachers from the UK visiting our school next week, and I've asked if someone could bring this book for me. Fingers crossed !!

I'm hoping it will be as good a read as Richard Dawkins' book, for which it should be an excellent counterbalance.


I can say I believe it is important to present this to them for reasons other than just the information it contains. It is important as a process. We as educated people owe it to ourselves and the fields we strive in to continue to grow and learn. Continuing education is called that because that is what it is supposed to be. We call a dental practice a practice for a reason. We practice to reach the ideal and be the best we can be, manifesting the best right action procedures and applications for both self and patient. If only everyone did so, perhaps right action would be more common. Or at least the number of people concerned with making right choices and taking right action would be more present.

I started a book once titled: The Danger of the Campfire. My point is this. Have you ever sat around the camp fire with friends, family and like minded folk gathering on a routine basis? Well, I grew up in it. Deer camp friendly, like minded survivor folk from small mining and paper mill towns in Md, and WV that were and are very tight knit. What happens around the deer camp or around the lecture hall cause the lecture hall started somewhere now didn't it? But what happens is people gather and they talk about their day. There are many positive things from this but the negatives I see are the competitions. What happens is the stories come. Then someone wants to top it. Then another and before long you have a competition of story telling and it begins to taint. The competition can get heated. Some take it very serious don' they? Some may even go to extremes to make sure their story gets heard the most, or believed the most or whatever. You see where it goes?

These scholars should always be aware of the ever present games the ego and the mind plays with our own progress. Its good to shove it in their face now and then and remind em to sit their big head down and just listen you bloody fool! Just listen!

[kemo]

Excellent talk. May invest in the book as what he says 'resonates' with me. Ingo Swann gave a talk on a similar theme i.e. conventional science and RV. It was posted on PA some time back but I just found on YouTube and it says video unavailable. Pity as I would have liked to have seen again.

[ExomatrixTV]

ZklRSn92ek4

Rupert Sheldrake is doing the cutting edge science that everyone else is afraid to touch. He and I shared the same stage at Joshua Tree at the weekend, and Rupert has just done a fascinating extended interview with Joe Rogan

I always hugely enjoy talking to Joe. He never fails to come up with surprises and new angles on things. One of the best, most incisive, most open-minded interviewers!



~you can skip the very long commercial rant of 9 minutes 21 seconds see: http://youtu.be/ZklRSn92ek4?t=9m21s

[MorningFox]

Ah I meant to watch this the other day. Thanks for the reminder!

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Great podcast, thanks for posting.

[ktlight]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4henADqlFto

"Published on 8 Oct 2014
What is a human being? It is the ultimate question, to which institutional science offers surprising answers. The materialistic paradigm, which has dominated institutional science for well over a century, states that the essence of consciousness can be reduced to the physical components of the brain. However, does an alternative scientific perspective exist?

One of the most remarkable researchers into consciousness and the evolution of life is biologist Dr. Rupert Sheldrake. Dr. Sheldrake is the author of more than 80 scientific papers and ten books. He has won international acclaim for his experimental research on his hypothesis of morphic fields and morphic resonance.

Dr. Sheldrake’s official website: www.sheldrake.org "

[grannyfranny100]

How refreshing to listen to Dr. Sheldrake in the midst of all the fear mongering that is escalating intensely.

[joeecho]

As the hypothesis goes....

Is it a robot that observes (consciously) that human beings are robots?

[Mike Gorman]

I was in contact with Rupert Sheldrake recently, I was discussing the work of Arthur M.Young - he is one of your American genius types who developed the first working helicopter of commercial quality - the Bell Helicopter. Arthur Young went on to develop a totally alternative cosmology and account for the universe and life - moving on from Relativity and even including astrology (!) I saw a lot of parallels with Rupert's' work in breaking down the dogmas of science, and he told me he knew Arthur Young and spoke with him a number of times. Just a little tid bit of relevant information, both men are totally refreshing in their thinking and re-affirmed my faith in modern thought.

[amor]

What about the thought that we are some other thing than the body and that singly and collectively we are generating holograms of our body, of the areas seemingly exterior to our bodies and eventually to the UNIVERSE, which may or may not be real as we think we see it. Also, possibly that we are a consciousness coming either from a confined space or dwell within a robotic consciousness outside of which there is outer darkness, for the idea of space may simply be mentally generated.

A random comment, I have recently had looks into the consciousness of acquaintances who have been dead a few days and are still at the funeral home. One was in a coma and I did not learn of it until some considerable time after. His face was disconnected and I knew it was a coma. In other cases, the consciousness of the dead could not move the body. They were vaguely aware of other bodies in their area but placed them in situations of the living rather than the dead. One man who had spent a lot of his life as an alcoholic, saw himself as lying under a cellar alongside of other derelict men who also could not move. My dearest friend of 58 years found herself under a vast overhead net which went on forever, from which there was no exit for her spirit. Much later, her face appeared in my consciousness with a most unusual bejeweled hairdo piled high on her head, showing her exalted spiritual condition of happiness, one she certainly deserved.

[ExomatrixTV]

Exposing Scientific Dogmas - Banned TED Talk - Rupert Sheldrake (https://www.sheldrake.org):

sF03FN37i5w


if taken down, you can see backup-video: here (https://rumble.com/v2a1fp6-exposing-scientific-dogmas-banned-ted-talk-rupert-sheldrake.html)

Rupert Sheldrake, PhD, is a biologist and author best known for his hypothesis of morphic resonance. At Cambridge University he worked in developmental biology as a Fellow of Clare College. He was Principal Plant Physiologist at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics in Hyderabad, India. From 2005 to 2010 he was Director of the Perrott-Warrick project for research on unexplained human and animal abilities, funded by Trinity College, Cambridge. Sheldrake has published a number of books - A New Science of Life (1981), The Presence of the Past (1988), The Rebirth of Nature (1991), Seven Experiments That Could Change the World (1994), Dogs That Know When Their Owners are Coming Home (1999), The Sense of Being Stared At (2003), The Science Delusion (Science Set Free) (2012), Science and Spiritual Practices (2017), Ways of Going Beyond and Why They Work (2019). Rupert gave a talk entitled The Science Delusion at TEDx Whitechapel, Jan 12, 2013. The theme for the night was Visions for Transition: Challenging existing paradigms and redefining values (for a more beautiful world). In response to protests from two materialists in the US, the talk was taken out of circulation by TED, relegated to a corner of their website and stamped with a warning label.


sheldrake.org (https://www.sheldrake.org) :bowing:



The Science Delusion (Original Unedited) HD720p


https://1a-1791.com/video/s8/2/0/I/m/5/0Im5h.gaa.mp4


source (https://rumble.com/v26uit0-the-science-delusion.html)

[ExomatrixTV]

Does Nature Have A Hidden Memory? - Rupert Sheldrake (https://www.sheldrake.org) | Modern Wisdom Podcast 379:

https://1a-1791.com/video/s8/2/f/F/G/-/fFG-c.caa.mp4


source (https://rumble.com/vtqe9x-does-nature-have-a-hidden-memory-rupert-sheldrake-modern-wisdom-podcast-379.html)

[ExomatrixTV]

The Extension of Mind Through Space and the Sense of Being Stared At: Sheldrake (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Rupert%20Sheldrake)-Vernon Dialogue:

SY0DYcT03S0
The Sense of Being Stared at and the Extension of Mind Through Space: Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogue

Do our minds reside solely inside our heads, or perhaps bodies? Or do they extend into the wider world, perhaps even reaching to the stars? In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon discuss the extended mind theory, taking a lead from recent work of Rupert’s on the sense of being stared at, and also the problems that contemporary science has with understanding vision. The discussion considers new research carried out by Rupert and others, as well as the theories of A.N. Whitehead. The way in which science since Maxwell has considered light as moving backwards as well as forwards in time is explored, alongside the way that William Blake described how we see, which itself fits the ancient understanding, that seeing is an active process of engagement, not a passive mode of reception.

Rupert references two published papers. One is on the nature of visual perception, co-written with Alex Gomez-Marin, online here:
https://www.sheldrake.org/files/pdfs/papers/The-Nature-of-Visual-Perception.pdf


PDF Source (https://www.sheldrake.org/files/pdfs/papers/The-Nature-of-Visual-Perception.pdf)

The other is on directional scopaesthesia, co-written with Pamela Smart, online here:


PDF (https://www.sheldrake.org/files/pdfs/papers/Scopaestheia-and-Its-Implications-for-Theories-of-Vision.pdf)

Dr. Rupert Sheldrake, PhD (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Rupert%20Sheldrake), is a biologist and author best known for his hypothesis of morphic resonance. At Cambridge University, as a Fellow of Clare College, he was Director of Studies in biochemistry and cell biology. As the Rosenheim Research Fellow of the Royal Society, he carried out research on the development of plants and the ageing of cells, and together with Philip Rubery discovered the mechanism of polar auxin transport. In India, he was Principal Plant Physiologist at the International Crops Research Institute for the Semi-Arid Tropics, where he helped develop new cropping systems now widely used by farmers. He is the author of more than 100 papers in peer-reviewed journals and his research contributions have been widely recognized by the academic community, earning him a notable h-index for numerous citations. On ResearchGate his Research Interest Score puts him among the top 4% of scientists.


sheldrake.org?svd=82 (https://www.sheldrake.org?svd=82)

------
Dr Mark Vernon is a psychotherapist and writer with a rich academic background in physics, theology, and philosophy. He contributes to programmes on the radio, writes and reviews for newspapers and magazines, gives talks and podcasts. His books have covered themes including friendship and God, ancient Greek philosophy and wellbeing. His new book, out August 2019, is "A Secret History of Christianity: Jesus, the Last Inkling and the Evolution of Consciousness". He has a PhD in ancient Greek philosophy, and other degrees in physics and in theology, and works as a psychotherapist in private practice. He used to be an Anglican priest.

[ExomatrixTV]

Presentiment: Waking Before Alarms, Making Millions Through Day Trading:

lALX0gpRzf4
Most people have had the experience of waking soon before an alarm clock goes off and some can even wake before a specified time without an alarm. The usual assumption is that this depends on an exquisitely sensitive time sense, but Rupert argues that it may be explained better in terms of presentiment, or ‘feeling the future’, or even in terms of an ‘extended present’. We already know that our sense of the present is not a mathematical instant, but has width, and perhaps it widens over ranges of seconds to include portions of the near future, Presentiment is now a well-established phenomenon in laboratory experiments, carried out at the Institute of Noetic Sciences, Cornell University and elsewhere, and may be widely distributed among people and non-human animals. It could play an important part in everyday life, and become especially significant in fast-moving sports like downhill skiing, tennis and ping pong. Some people may make use of this ability in day trading where they make decisions on movements of the markets over very short time periods, sometimes only a few seconds. Rupert Sheldrake discusses how this ability could potentially be trained, enabling airline pilots and racing drivers to be better prepared for potential accidents, and helping some people to get rich quick – as some day traders already have – by using intuitive abilities that cannot be duplicated by computers.

references:

An Experiment with Time by John William Dunne:


archive.org/details/AnExperimentWithTimeEbook (https://archive.org/details/AnExperimentWithTimeEbook)

Listen to the Animals: Why did so many animals escape December's tsunami?:


sheldrake.org/tsunami (https://www.sheldrake.org/tsunami)

Predicting the unpredictable; evidence of pre-seismic anticipatory behaviour in the common toad:


sheldrake.org/toads (https://www.sheldrake.org/toads)

Dogs That Know When Their Owners Are Coming Home:


sheldrake.org/dogs (https://www.sheldrake.org/dogs)

Unconscious Perception of Future Emotions: An Experiment in Presentiment
by Dean Radin, Journal of Scientific Exploration, Vol. 11, No. 2, pp. 163-180, 1997:


dropbox.com/s/j364ntu56u3qlvu/1997%20presentiment.pdf (https://www.dropbox.com/s/j364ntu56u3qlvu/1997%20presentiment.pdf)

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[gini]

Bumping this thread,i think the subject of the video above in the last post is fascinating and some serious food for thought.. This is an interview with Mr Sheldrake from 3 weeks ago ---F1l-Ci7IJtg- 8 Mar 2024
'The facts of science, scientific techniques and technologies are real enough. But, the philosophy of materialism that governs conventional scientific thinking is an act of faith grounded in a 19th-century ideology. It is time to set science free. In this webinar, we dialogued with Dr. Rupert Sheldrake on all things consciousness. Does it exist beyond the brain? Where did our ideas on consciousness originate from? How do we move beyond it?

This webinar was held in celebration of the relaunch of The Rupert Sheldrake Course, now available for purchase on-demand.'

0:00 - Opening
1:49 - What is materialist science? How is it a limiting worldview?
10:15 - The history of modern science, and why it's relevant
22:41 - The development of consciousness studies
37:37 - Consciousness, technology and AI
48:44 - Could we integrate consciousness into mainstream science?
56:48 - Quantum theory and consciousness
58:53 - Closing invitation

[ExomatrixTV]

Cross-posting from here (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?123054-Observations-of-Flatness&p=1612600&viewfull=1#post1612600), because it is highly relevant:


...

So if matter is "Frozen Light (https://rumble.com/v4ofrou-rupert-sheldrake-matter-is-frozen-light-sheldrake-vernon-dialogue-86.html)" ... a concept which I heard for the first time in 1991 via contactee Dr. Saskia Bosman (https://inspiradiance.nl/about-me/) in Amsterdam https://forum.verstappen.com/images/smiley_icons/hupjos.gif33 years ago long before Rupert Sheldrake (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?5933-Rupert-Sheldrake) discussed it (https://rumble.com/v4ofrou-rupert-sheldrake-matter-is-frozen-light-sheldrake-vernon-dialogue-86.html) ... than it is obvious to me, we can not fully grasp what water (H2O) really is if you do not fully study all 3 phases: frozen state, liquid state & gas state!


When you study the "frozen" phase of water ... crystals (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=emoto) seems to tell us something!
Studying fluids & gas has totally different qualities, especially when there is a huge pressure involved.

The behavior of gases/liquids of other elements of the Periodic Table System (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table) also fascinating!

Shapes within shapes ... angles/fractals etc. also affect the outcome.


I remember being exited in physics class when we were observing/studying sublimation/deposition (https://www.quora.com/What-is-the-difference-between-sublimation-and-evaporation-Which-one-has-more-energy)processes of certain elements, skipping the liquid state completely.

You could say "gas form", symbolical speaking, represents the spiritual part and the "frozen form" the more grounded/touch/heaviness/limitations part of the elements.

If liquids/fluids are the bridges between 2 states, no wonder we are born in water ... in fluids ... and the fluid water represents life of all 3 states depending on where it is ... changing form over and over in a seemingly endless cycle.

All elements of the Periodic Table System (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Periodic_table) have their own qualities when it comes to the 3 phases ... then there is the "4th phase (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?123028-Plasma-life-other-plasma-evidence-NOT-explained-by-standard-plasma-science&p=1611074&viewfull=1#post1611074)" transmuting/transforming the properties of the elements.


I wonder what plasma (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?123028-Plasma-life-other-plasma-evidence-NOT-explained-by-standard-plasma-science&p=1611074&viewfull=1#post1611074) symbolical speaking represents and what about electricity being KEY for a functional brain!

How does electricity relate to "light"? ... If you are in the far, far ancient times when you did not know how to create fire yet ... you saw light being omitted "out of thin air" due to electricity coming from the clouds ... thunderclouds ... a frequency that we now know how it works ... so LIGHT that appears to be created from "nothing".

All manifestations that are related to what we call "light" is related to our main "light sensor" called: "the eye" which is to many STILL a big mystery how it evolved in the so-called "evolution theory" it has at least 20 unique complex mechanisms (https://rumble.com/v3q9jqs-expelled-no-intelligence-allowed-ben-steins-full-movie.html) that are working together to produce a functional eye ... which even Charles Darwin (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charles_Darwin) admitted in his 2nd book not to be "explained" that easily! As you can not have a "half eye" stage before it became a "full working eye" with all necessary complex components.


And I did not even mention: "Biophotons (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=biophotons)", Sonoluminescence (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=sonoluminescence), Bioluminescence (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JSd3vI2247o), and the real mystery of what the "3 flavors of Neutrons (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=TliQumwzu-c)" are.



Happening for millions of years: "Luciferase (https://nl.wikipedia.org/wiki/Luciferase)" = FMNH2 + O2 + RCHO → FMN + RCOOH + H2O + Light ... In the reaction, molecular oxygen oxidizes flavin mononucleotide and a long-chain aliphatic aldehyde to an aliphatic carboxylic acid. The reaction forms an excited hydroxyflavin intermediate, which is dehydrated to the product FMN to emit blue-green light. Nearly all of the energy input into the reaction is transformed into light. The reaction 90% efficient >>> in comparison, the incandescent light bulb only converts about 10% of its energy into light and a 150 lumen per Watt (lm/W) LED converts 20% of input energy to visible light.

cheers,
John Kuhles (https://substack.com/@johnkuhles) 🦜🦋🌳
May 8th, 2024

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this new post by Helvetic on his thread:

(https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1383-The-Continuing-Search-For-The-Truth&p=1633423&viewfull=1#post1633423)~~~

Rupert Sheldrake | Meet The Scientist BANNED By TED Talks | Sept. 11, 2024

Source: Jesse Michels youtube (https://www.youtube.com/@JesseMichels)

wT5-hXWIkzM

Description:

Join us for a captivating conversation with renowned biologist and author, Rupert Sheldrake. In this thought-provoking interview, we delve deep into Sheldrake's groundbreaking theories on morphic resonance, the nature of consciousness, the sense of being stared at, and the limitations of conventional science. Discover how his controversial and heretical ideas within academia challenge mainstream scientific thinking and open up new possibilities for understanding reality and our place within it.

Whether you're familiar with Sheldrake's work or new to his ideas, this interview offers valuable insights into the mysteries of life, mind, and the cosmos. Don't miss out on this chance to explore the cutting edge of science and consciousness research with one of its most original luminaries!

1. Sheldrake has collected an enormous amount of experimental evidence that people can sense when they are being stared at by others, a phenomenon known as “scopaesthesia”

2. This is (possibly) because consciousness involves a “transaction” (a Wheeler-Feynman handshake) between the outer physical world and the brain which emits/projects an image outwards onto any given object being sensed (if that object is conscious, like a human, they can sense that projection taking place). John Cramer, a Physicist from the University of Washington further developed a transactional interpretation of quantum mechanics which may support Sheldrake’s empirical findings here

3. Sheldrake has also acquired a lot of evidence around human and animal ability for “presentiment” or “precognition” of the future. This sounds like pseudoscience on the surface, but if the brain has a quantum component (widely hypothesized by Sir Roger @penrose and others), it could send information back in time providing a real physical model for these sorts of phenomena

4. Biology (morphology and even perhaps cells themselves) per the great work of @drmichaellevin, seem to work towards “conscious” or at least deliberate aims. Sheldrake would say they acquire information through “morphic fields”, a concept Darwin himself may have been open to, but that close minded "neodarwinians" like @RichardDawkins dismiss out of hand. If these fields are at all real (or really, if we have any inherited information transfer transcending DNA), they represent a fundamental update on modern concepts of evolution

5. The Sun and magnetic field of the earth combine to create the finely tuned conditions of intelligent life. Does this point towards a random universe? Or is that just as dogmatic as inserting God as a creator?

6. We speak of Sheldrake’s long friendship with legendary scientist and “fungal philosopher” Terence McKenna. We also discuss Sheldrake’s not super well known book “The Physics of Angels”, one with clear implications for the modern UFO conversation…

7. In 2013, Ted censored Sheldrake's talk with literally no first principles reasoning around his data or experimental protocols. They did it purely because he deviated too much from the consensus "understanding" of consciousness (a subject nobody really understands). This was their explicitly cited reason on their blog. That move, from Ted, was small-minded and contradicts the spirit of true scientific inquiry. Please watch this video (and Sheldrake's others) to engage with his ideas openly! All earnest engagements with them in support or opposition are welcome.

[Bruce G Charlton]

I interacted with Rupert Sheldrake a few times by e-mail, and found him invariably helpful, courteous and honest. I think it is well worth engaging with his work - even when (like me) one has quite different basic assumptions, and are (like me) much more pessimistic about the state of science than he is!

We both published books about the state of science in 2012 - mine was Not even trying, his was The Science Delusion. My book (which made negligible impact at the time, though more since) regarded real science as dead so that future real science must be an amateur affair among small groups of honest competent individuals.

Rupert's book was widely reviewed and discussed, and it regarded professional science as in a bad way but reformable - and he provided a programme.

(So far, my pessimism has been abundantly correct!)

However, and I put this to him explicitly, I regard Rupert as mainly a philosopher, indeed a metaphysican, in his writings. Of course he is also a real scientist; but his main arguments are metaphsyical - i.e. concerned with the underlying assumptions within-which science operates. That is why he includes discussion of spiritual phenomena such as angels.

But Rupert does tend to present his fundamental ideas as if they can logically be derived from scientific considerations, from observational experiments and laboratory studies, for example. But this is not strictly correct, which is why Sheldrake's ideas have no traction with those who reject his assumptions. His data can always be interpreted to fit with mainstream assumptions - and rejected as fraudulent if they apparently don't.

In this respect he has made no progress since his first book came out in the early 1980s, shortly after which I saw him give a (superb!) lecture at Newcastle University, invited there by Professor Paul Davies (an interesting and unorthodox astrophysicist).

[ExomatrixTV]

How does memory work? Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogue:

F0W85ECY6Ys
No one knows. Repeated experiments have failed to locate where memories are stored in the brain, casting doubt on the conventional assumption that memories are stored as material traces. In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon discuss various kinds of memory, from episodic memory to habits. They consider how memory is linked to emotion and place, drawing on insights from Aristotle to AN Whitehead. Rupert’s own work has led to the theory of morphic fields, within which all self-organising systems dwell. They also ask about Indian ideas of memory and how that is related to ideas about reincarnation and the possibility that everything that exists lives, in some way, in the memory of God.

00:00:00 - Introduction and Overview of Memory
00:00:31 - Memory as a Fundamental Principle of Nature
00:01:22 - Psychological Aspects and Types of Memory
00:03:41 - Western Philosophical Views on Memory
00:04:13 - Aristotle's Perception of Memory
00:05:33 - Medieval and Early Christian Views on Memory
00:08:03 - Memory, Place, and Emotion in Psychotherapy
00:10:48 - Scientific Studies on Memory Storage
00:13:56 - Challenges in Finding Memory Traces
00:17:26 - Alternative Theories: Memory Beyond Materialism
00:19:22 - Morphic Resonance and Collective Memory
00:22:31 - Memory in All Nature: Eastern Philosophies
00:27:08 - Recollection in Plato and Indian Thought
00:30:10 - Memory and Reincarnation in Buddhist Philosophy
00:33:25 - Influence of Eastern Views on Western Thought
00:35:32 - Quantum Theory and Memory in Nature
00:36:31 - Idealist Worldview: Memory in the Divine Mind
00:38:11 - Conclusion: Memory as Fundamental to Nature and the Divine

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this new post by Helvetic on his thread:

(https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1383-The-Continuing-Search-For-The-Truth&p=1639087&viewfull=1#post1639087)~~~

Rupert Sheldrake | The Scientist Researching Morphic Fields | Oct. 22, 2024

Source: TOE Curt Jaimungal youtube (https://www.youtube.com/@TheoriesofEverything), sheldrake.org (http://sheldrake.org)

67Y5dRyX4mM

Description:

In today's episode, biologist Rupert Sheldrake, a former research fellow at Cambridge University with a PhD in biochemistry, explores the concepts of morphic resonance, the extended mind, and telepathy, challenging mainstream scientific paradigms. Sheldrake discusses how memory and habits may exist beyond the brain, proposing that our consciousness and gaze have tangible, measurable effects on the world around us.


TIMESTAMPS:

00:00 - Intro
00:17 - Morphic Resonance
10:07 - Scopaesthesia (Sense of Being Looked At)
15:35 - Rupert’s Empirical Research
28:39 - “This Phenomenon Has to do with Light”
37:56 - Prey vs. Predator Animals
47:09 - Extramission
50:42 - Memories and Organ Transplants
56:36 - Michael Levin’s Theory of Memory
01:02:10 - “Morphic Fields Are Physical”
01:04:45 - Fundamental Reality & Idealism
01:29:50 - God, Trinity, Cosmic Christ
01:31:32 - Mysticism & Meditation
01:35:04 - How to Pray
01:42:12 - Summary of Episode
01:50:17 - Outro

[Neptune7]

Hi Bruce

My own work, Edge theory, provides rigorous mathematical support for Dr. Sheldrake's theories. I too have exchanged emails with him and can confirm that, for a working scientist, he is extremely open, honest, and courteous.

I agree with you that real science is becoming an amateur affair.

If you care to, I would like to hear you expand on your statement that Dr. Sheldrake's ideas cannot be logically derived from experiments. I don't see that. To me, he has provided plentiful experimental evidence for his theories. The Lost Boys (main stream science) simply reject evidence that does not match their worldview.

[ExomatrixTV]

Nature's Hidden Intelligence: Morphic Fields | Rupert Sheldrake PhD:

qrIlWrGe4w4
Can morphic resonance help explain the problem of missing heritability and why memories have not been found in the brain? In this interview, Dr. Rupert Sheldrake discusses with Natalia Vorontsova his theory of morphic fields and its implications for our understanding of the mysteries of nature. Dr. Sheldrake (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Sheldrake) is often called a most original thinker, perhaps because throughout his career he has managed to combine open-mindedness with critical scientific thinking.



00:00:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=0s) Interview intro

00:02:18 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=138s) Bach, Mozart, or Purcell?

00:03:09 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=189s) Rupert's background and research.

00:06:37 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=397s) What genes, epigenetics and evolution by natural selection don't explain.

00:20:36 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=1236s) How does morphic resonance work?

00:24:28 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=1468s) Examples of morphic fields and morphic resonance.

00:29:08 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=1748s) How can we measure morphic fields?

00:32:13 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=1933s) Physarum algorithm and morphic resonance experiments.

00:39:29 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=2369s) Are laws of nature just habits?

00:50:09 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=3009s) Brain, mind, consciousness and where memories are stored.

00:59:43 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=3583s) What is the locus of Mind and consciousness?

01:05:32 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=3932s) How nature is organized: hierarchical morphic fields.

01:07:47 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=4067s) Are thoughts and emotions our own?

01:12:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=4320s) Intuition and morphic resonance.

01:16:34 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=4594s) What needs to change in the scientific paradigm?

01:19:17 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=4757s) Science and spirituality.

01:22:06 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qrIlWrGe4w4&t=4926s) Advice for students and young scientists.


Online resources: sheldrake.org (https://www.sheldrake.org)

[Johnnycomelately]

I like old Rupert’s ideas and talk, about morphic resonance. I’ve liked them since he was a spry less-old guy. And his mind is still spry enough to best the very smart host Curt Jaimungal at some contentious points.

Biology's Most Controversial Theory of Morphic Fields

Curt Jaimungal

421K subscribers

3k+ views, 1.13, 2025

“Main episode with Rupert Sheldrake: • The UK’s Most Controversial Scientist : ... ” (link available in original description)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M0yuGG6WpHU

[Johnnycomelately]

Rupert is a good elder.

His summary, a short form slaying screed, goes from about 45:25 / 52:56 to about the end. Recommended.

That last bit is in response to his discussioner’s last set-up question, which starts at 44:33.

Vid up to then is IMO uncomfortable at times. Too much affirmation of religions, from both men. Rupert’s tales of the cobra, the rat, and the tree, give me pause for prayer. He talks nature and consciousness, but I’m not sure he gets life.

Living in an Age of Spiritual Crisis

Rupert Sheldrake
103K subscribers

Posted March 5, 25

“Much of the modern world has become uncoupled from the transcendent in a cultural experiment Nietzsche called the death of God. But might this spiritual crisis prove to be a time of rebirth? In this episode of the Sheldrake-Vernon Dialogues, recorded live at an event organised by the Temenos Academy, Rupert Sheldrake and Mark Vernon discuss the evolution of wisdom traditions from west and east alongside the great modern enterprise called science and its continuing development. As the materialist, progressive ideology that has dominated the sciences for two centuries wanes, and as scientific studies show that religious and spiritual practices have major benefits for physical and mental health, what insights might we cultivate, as we live in and through these times?”


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=02GUVHLYc0w

[ExomatrixTV]

New Evidence of Morphic Resonance - Rupert Sheldrake:

JEE3T5Lv9zU
Rupert Sheldrake, Ph.D., is a biologist and author of more than 90 scientific papers and 9 books, and the co-author of 6 books. His books have been published in 28 languages. He was among the top 100 Global Thought Leaders for 2013, as ranked by the Duttweiler Institute, Zurich, Switzerland's leading think tank. On ResearchGate, the largest scientific and academic online network, his RG score of 34.4 puts him among the top 7.5% of researchers, based on citations of his peer-reviewed publications. On Google Scholar, the many citations of his work give him a high h-index of 40, and an i10 index of 120. For ten years running he has been recognized as one of the 'most spiritually influential living people in the world' by Watkins Mind Body Spirit magazine. His work has been featured in many magazines, newspapers and broadcast media, including New Scientist, The Guardian, Discover magazine, The Spectator, The Washington Post, Die Zeit and on BBC radio and television.

[ExomatrixTV]

End of Life Experiences in Animals:

o2TbJ5YYXx8
In the remarkable phenomenon of “terminal lucidity”, people who have suffered from dementia for years recover their memory, are aware that they are dying and behave with surprising clarity, showing a burst of mental and physical energy. They can recognize people again, recall memories, and take part in activities they were previously unable to. Even for people who have not suffered from dementia, there is often a surge of energy soon before they die, sometimes called the “last rally”. Based on a collection of more than 100 case histories, I have studied end-of-life experiences in non-human animals, together with my colleagues Pam Smart and Dr Michael Nahm, a leading researcher on human terminal lucidity. We published these results in a paper called Experiences of Dying Animals: Parallels With End-Of-Life Experiences in Humans in the Journal of Scientific Exploration. We were able to group these experiences into specific categories, most of which are similar to end-of-life experiences in people.

In this video I summarize our findings with examples from some of the case studies.

This is part of a new series of videos, called “Findings”, in which I discuss a wide range of my research projects.


rupertsheldrake.substack.com/p/end-of-life-experiences-in-animals (https://rupertsheldrake.substack.com/p/end-of-life-experiences-in-animals) :cat::dog:


--o-O-o--

When Rupert uses the word: "goodbye".

I remembered my own pets (cats) dying the last 40+ years: ... Tracey, Rocky, Misha, Dusty, Osho, Misha 2, Vio, Lumy & Rocky 2 ... I also noticed behavior change as well ... sometimes I noticed my own behavior change as if I can sense it too, when I was working and finished I sensed Rock 1 died but did not have any reason to know that, yet I felt it, I was cycling very hard (8 km ride) to go back to my home and did that pure out of intuition, and then I saw my cat has just died and was still warm to the touch.

Most cases of "goodbye moments" are so much more than that: ... It is also showing appreciation & love for the care & love I gave to my cats! Like it wants to thank me before they leave this plane of existence and go to a different realm.

As a NDE/Asperger I know so many details of the past vividly as if it happened yesterday, that clear! ... this can be a blessing and a cruse ... depending on how you cope/deal with it.

cheers,
John 🦜🦋🌳

[ExomatrixTV]

What is mainstream science hiding? | Rupert Sheldrake FULL INTERVIEW with Hilary Lawson:

h_b7f9rvDrA
Rupert Sheldrake (https://rumble.com/search/all?q=Rupert%20Sheldrake) speaks to Hilary Lawson about scopasthesia, morphic resonance, his ongoing struggle with the scientific establishment, and his core worldview. What are the beliefs you would never give up?


00:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA) Introduction
00:45 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=45s) Why have you found the scientific community so difficult to convince?
05:08 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=308s) Is your interpretation of experimental data affected by your underlying philosophical views?
08:00 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=480s) Do you consider your own theory to be a model, or the truth?

10:26 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=626s) What are the potential applications of your theories?

13:05 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=785s) Are there key pieces of evidence that your skeptics are ignoring?
16:47 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=1007s) Are there parts of your philosophical framework that you would never give up?
20:10 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=1210s) To what degree does conventional scientific wisdom – and public interest – guide what you write?

24:02 (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h_b7f9rvDrA&t=1442s) What would you like to achieve next?

[ExomatrixTV]

Rupert Sheldrake On Panpsychism And Spirituality:

R2r1NTK_lDw
Rupert Sheldrake explores the concept of God as the consciousness that exists not only within humans, but within the entire cosmos. Are we all fragments of the same, greater consciousness?

[ExomatrixTV]

Banned Harvard Scientist Proves What CONSCIOUSNESS & The SOUL REALLY Are! INSANE! | Rupert Sheldrake:

ezmE-lg5J_o
Rupert Sheldrake discusses his theory of morphic resonance, suggesting that nature has inherent memory and self-organizing systems resonate across time. He argues that memories are not stored in the brain but tuned into through morphic resonance.

Rupert also explores the concept of the soul, linking it to the morphogenetic fields that shape bodies and behaviors. He discusses the spiritual implications of his work, including the potential for life after death and the importance of spiritual practices for human well-being. Rupert also shares his research on telepathy in dogs and cats, suggesting a deeper interconnectedness between species.


0:00:00 - Episode Teaser
0:02:06 – Nature Remembers
0:06:55 – Human Connection
0:08:48 – 100th Monkey
0:10:34 – Shared Animal Knowledge
0:11:13 – Reality as Vibration
0:13:52 – Ancient Parallels
0:17:54 – Being a Rebel Scientist
0:26:24 – What Is the Soul?
0:47:59 – NDE Insights
0:56:00 – Humanity Awakening
1:01:31 – Psychic Pets

[Bill Ryan]

Copying this new post by Helvetic on his thread: (https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?1383-The-Continuing-Search-For-The-Truth&p=1698650&viewfull=1#post1698650)

~~~

Rupert Sheldrake | What If the Universe Remembers Everything? | Jan. 14, 2026

Source: Rupert Sheldrake youtube (https://www.youtube.com/@RupertSheldrakePhD)

9js06nu2I3s
Description:

Sometimes crystals behave in surprising ways. A new chemical may resist crystallizing for years, and then, once it happens in one place, it suddenly begins to crystallize easily all over the world.

Sometimes animals, too, show a strange collective learning. Once one group has learned a new behavior, the same species elsewhere seems able to learn it more quickly, even without any direct contact.

In this keynote address, from the Science of Consciousness Conference, Rupert brings these and other examples together to suggest a simple but radical possibility.

[meat suit]

Great talk by Rupert, I had never heard of melting points of materials changing..wow..
He also mentions 'family constellations' I have been to a few and it is incredible what happens there..

[onawah]

The information Sheldrake is sharing may parallel somewhat what is expressed in Dan Brown's (author of "The DaVinci Code"--one of the biggest best sellers of all time) new novel, "The Secret of Secrets".
(Though Brown's work is no doubt much more pedestrian and less scientific than Sheldrake's).
I've just started reading "Secrets", and so far the theme seems to be focused on a discovery that indicates human consciousness doesn't just witness events, but actually creates them.
...Which tallies with what Anandamayi Ma (1896-1982), one of India's most revered spiritual saints and mystics, used to say....that there is no separation between the Creator and the consciouness of ordinary humans.
See: https://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?860-Enlightenment-The-Ego-what-is-it-How-to-transcend-it.&p=1698301&viewfull=1#post1698301

Great talk by Rupert, I had never heard of melting points of materials changing..wow..
He also mentions 'family constellations' I have been to a few and it is incredible what happens there..