Multiple UFOs Observe 2013 Oklahoma Tornadoes?

[naste.de.lumina]

Curious?


tJlH5ngTczM

EJuqfs_WkRQ

[ljwheat]

this is how easy it is to create CGI and this is just a bunce of dots UFO'S--- really?????

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=uFxnBrO9n7o

now explain how these are real.....


Here is the original footage :-) http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEqXpesgYg0

[tnkayaker]

i dont know, it seems the one orb moves out of the way of the tornado, not to mention it is filmed from a couple differnt angles, im a believer for sure but i also dont go in for getting dupped by CGI but i think this one should be investigated a bit before we all toss it aside, just a thought, peace,dennis

[naste.de.lumina]

this is how easy it is to create CGI and this is just a bunce of dots UFO'S--- really?????

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=uFxnBrO9n7o

now explain how these are real.....

If it is easy to create so it should be easy to debunk right?
Now explain how these are not real.

[ljwheat]

this is how easy it is to create CGI and this is just a bunce of dots UFO'S--- really?????

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=uFxnBrO9n7o

now explain how these are real.....

If it is easy to create so it should be easy to debunk right?
Now explain how these are not real.

No one can. thats the point, if this is CGI its "sick" using a Natonal Desaster for foolery IMHO its sick.

[naste.de.lumina]

this is how easy it is to create CGI and this is just a bunce of dots UFO'S--- really?????

http://www.youtube.com/watch_popup?v=uFxnBrO9n7o

now explain how these are real.....

If it is easy to create so it should be easy to debunk right?
Now explain how these are not real.

No one can. thats the point, if this is CGI its "sick" using a Natonal Desaster for foolery IMHO its sick.

I fully agree that it would be sick to use a tragedy to invent a joke.
But the point is .... We can not discuss any more picture or video, it could all be a hoax that can not be proven true or false?
I understand and respect your opinion.
Peace.

[ljwheat]

Just a couple of key points, 1). The dots by scale are bigger than the houses there over. 2). The original footage side by side with this doctored footage has no dots in it. 3). The announcers are to busy or blind and don’t see the dots either. 4), something three or four times the size of a house and brighter than anything else in the sky wasn’t notice till a couple days later?

The helicopter pilot was he blind too? Or was he busy texting and driving like everyone else at that time.

and suddenly this video pops up on you tube.

Here is the original footage before CGI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEqXpesgYg0

[william r sanford72]

any body have the dvr recording of this.the orig. footage would be key in solving the hoax argument.what were looking at is not the first brodcast.its rehash from you tube.so.....

[RMorgan]

Well, the first video is edited to the point where it´s impossible to contextually define what are those objects; They could be debris, cell phone mast lights, other TV helicopters or airplanes filming the same things from another angle...They could be anything.

Besides, They should post a link to the original videos. Without them, there´s no way to confirm if the objects were added in post-production or not.

Be careful with UFO videos showed out of context and without the links to the original video.

The second video, in my opinion, is obviously CGI.

There used to be plenty of honest UFO video channels on youtube; Nowadays, 99% of the UFO scene is taken over by hoaxers.

[ljwheat]

Well, the first video is edited to the point where it´s impossible to contextually define what are those objects; They could be debris, cell phone mast lights, other TV helicopters or airplanes filming the same things from another angle...They could be anything.

Besides, They should post a link to the original videos. Without them, there´s no way to confirm if the objects were added in post-production or not.

Be careful with UFO videos showed out of context and without the links to the original video.

The second video, in my opinion, is obviously CGI.

There used to be plenty of honest UFO video channels on youtube; Nowadays, 99% of the UFO scene is taken over by hoaxers.

I did some searching and here is the original footage that was used --- No CGI yet. at about 1:00 on the scale http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEqXpesgYg0

clearly you can see electical line transformers exploding in this no UFO's LOL

[naste.de.lumina]

Just a couple of key points, 1). The dots by scale are bigger than the houses there over. 2). The original footage side by side with this doctored footage has no dots in it. 3). The announcers are to busy or blind and don’t see the dots either. 4), something three or four times the size of a house and brighter than anything else in the sky wasn’t notice till a couple days later?

The helicopter pilot was he blind too? Or was he busy texting and driving like everyone else at that time.

and suddenly this video pops up on you tube.

Here is the original footage before CGI http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sEqXpesgYg0

You're comparing footage from different broadcasters.
The video where the alleged UFOs appear are the channel and 8.
What you claim to be original before the CGI is channel 4.
People tend to believe what they want to be true.
If the subject before seeing the video already has a preconceived Edéia like 'one of those fake videos', he will not believe even if the ufo hover in front.
I try to keep my mind open to the possibilities.
Can be fooled by this,
But the opposite is also a possibility. Do not see something real for unbelievers
With respect to the reporter and helicopter pilot, they work for a station that has defined the procedures to be adopted in the most adverse circumstances.
It would be naive to them through the live broadcast of the tornado, say ... hey friends ... forget to look at the tornado ufos ... have some here that are more interesting ... seeing ... those two right there ... another one left .. uauuu .. did you see that?
That does not mean we do not comment on them in between off.
Another detail .... original video would be possible only for those who saw the live broadcast, as the same as the youtube videos are doubtful to me of the television stations controlled mind are too.
I am not claiming that UFOs are real, but they are possibilities.

[ljwheat]

One helicopter one feed, two channels using the same feed and one more channel using it to add there logo UFO / what’s the difference. Thousands of people were watching this take place first person, none say anything about funny lights in the sky. I’m sick of these sick hoaxed video’s about ufo’s and am done with this one. Its hoaxed -- IMHO

[Lifebringer]

Picking up souls? I saw some footage of two angels in Iraq landing on a roof after an explosion and coming up with a child from the building. I still look at the Angel sightings and know something bigger than us exist and will be there for those who are harmed. Perhaps they observed to make sure the EF5 didn't do any more damage and kept it in a line after it reversed down the highway. You know a super shot of "hot heat and sun in the right places, can evaporate a monster like this. Remember the rope? It almost touched down again, until a burst of sunlight stopped the rotations enough to allow the clouds to pass.

All I can say is I went fishing caught 2 and was given 2 Stripers at the river on the bridge in Richmond VA. They have been running like crazy and they are big.

Got four for dinner and God knows I don't have any stocks because family doesn't budget, and can't deny themselves wants, when they should be doing their needs.

We had graduation this month #4 graduated JMU, and boy am I a happy camper. 3 in JUNE graduating and that will be great! Accomplishment feels so goot!

[778 neighbour of some guy]

I saw some footage of two angels in Iraq landing on a roof after an explosion and coming up with a child from the building.

That is mighty interesting, got link? That made me very curious.

Ed

[naste.de.lumina]

Different shots at different times. After and during the tornadoes.

5parSVsrTZM

v_HZsvVujzA

[InCiDeR]

On the other hand, this videos shows none:

Incredible Time-Lapse of Tornado in OKLAHOMA CITY 5/20/13
9jAg9_s2UCI

Time-Lapse Video: Tornado Rips through Oklahoma City Area
Fq0BiuQ346U

So, I guess we need more proof for the Ufos?

[naste.de.lumina]

On the other hand, this videos shows none:

Incredible Time-Lapse of Tornado in OKLAHOMA CITY 5/20/13
9jAg9_s2UCI

Time-Lapse Video: Tornado Rips through Oklahoma City Area
Fq0BiuQ346U

So, I guess we need more proof for the Ufos?

InCiDeR
The first video you posted from 0:20, look at the bottom left.
Use as a reference point the terrain brown square.
The corner of the square is closest to the funnel.
Two balls of light moving at high speed in the opposite direction to the funnel.
Then the 0:24 out of the right corner toward the left another ball of light at high speed.

[InCiDeR]

On the other hand, this videos shows none:

Incredible Time-Lapse of Tornado in OKLAHOMA CITY 5/20/13
9jAg9_s2UCI

Time-Lapse Video: Tornado Rips through Oklahoma City Area
Fq0BiuQ346U

So, I guess we need more proof for the Ufos?

InCiDeR
The first video you posted from 0:20, look at the bottom left.
Use as a reference point the terrain brown square.
The corner of the square is closest to the funnel.
Two balls of light moving at high speed in the opposite direction to the funnel.
Then the 0:24 out of the right corner toward the left another ball of light at high speed.

I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.

What you think?

[naste.de.lumina]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

[InCiDeR]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

Agreed. Still, my videos does not explain or contradict your latest videos showing those lights. I will look for some more videos covering this event :)

[naste.de.lumina]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

Agreed. Still, my videos does not explain or contradict your latest videos showing those lights. I will look for some more videos covering this event :)


The third video I posted, the one where the guy shoots several ufos after tornadoes ... Then, I found some comments from youtube and people are saying they are Chinese lanterns .. Looks like it's a tradition after passage of tornadoes in Oklahoma.
Makes sense, because they were many lights and sure more people would have filmed if they were something really weird.

[InCiDeR]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

Agreed. Still, my videos does not explain or contradict your latest videos showing those lights. I will look for some more videos covering this event :)


The third video I posted, the one where the guy shoots several ufos after tornadoes ... Then, I found some comments from youtube and people are saying they are Chinese lanterns .. Looks like it's a tradition after passage of tornadoes in Oklahoma.
Makes sense, because they were many lights and sure more people would have filmed if they were something really weird.

... or helicopters that are covering the event. Chinese lanterns... really?! After a catastrophe people think of release lanterns?

[naste.de.lumina]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

Agreed. Still, my videos does not explain or contradict your latest videos showing those lights. I will look for some more videos covering this event :)


The third video I posted, the one where the guy shoots several ufos after tornadoes ... Then, I found some comments from youtube and people are saying they are Chinese lanterns .. Looks like it's a tradition after passage of tornadoes in Oklahoma.
Makes sense, because they were many lights and sure more people would have filmed if they were something really weird.

... or helicopters that are covering the event. Chinese lanterns... really?! After a catastrophe people think of release lanterns?

I do not believe they are helicopters, are very close to each other,
and they have lights are like airplanes that are flashing,
which is not the case here.
Chinese lanterns I had never heard.
Some reviews of the video say they are, others deny.
So for me to remain unidentified flying objects.
The video you posted, the lights are cars.
Note that pass roads.
The Time-Lapse does move quickly. I was wrong, sorry.

[InCiDeR]

InCiDeR
I believe they seems to move very fast because this video shows a 20-30 min scenery compressed to only 1:37.
What you think?

Yes, this explains the high speed ... But what is it? At least strange.

Agreed. Still, my videos does not explain or contradict your latest videos showing those lights. I will look for some more videos covering this event :)


The third video I posted, the one where the guy shoots several ufos after tornadoes ... Then, I found some comments from youtube and people are saying they are Chinese lanterns .. Looks like it's a tradition after passage of tornadoes in Oklahoma.
Makes sense, because they were many lights and sure more people would have filmed if they were something really weird.

... or helicopters that are covering the event. Chinese lanterns... really?! After a catastrophe people think of release lanterns?

I do not believe they are helicopters, are very close to each other,
and they have lights are like airplanes that are flashing,
which is not the case here.
Chinese lanterns I had never heard.
Some reviews of the video say they are, others deny.
So for me to remain unidentified flying objects.
The video you posted, the lights are cars.
Note that pass roads.
The Time-Lapse does move quickly. I was wrong, sorry.

No need to be sorry my friend. This is the beauty of it all, investigate something mysterious together.

I am not positive about that Chinese lantern theory though. Would people really relase lanterns in the middle of a catastrophe, would that idea even cross their mind?

Yes, it sure looks like it, it's the circumstances I have questions about.

[naste.de.lumina]

No need to be sorry my friend. This is the beauty of it all, investigate something mysterious together.
I am not positive about that Chinese lantern theory though. Would people really relase lanterns in the middle of a catastrophe, would that idea even cross their mind?
Yes, it sure looks like it, it's the circumstances I have questions about.

I'll keep an eye on this in the coming days and if there is any new material I will warn you via PM my friend.
Thanks for listening and peace be with you.