View Full Version : Texas radiation in drinking water covered up
Sidney
4th June 2013, 20:26
This video is 2 years old, but I have not seen it, and think it is very damning evidence, and highlights, common practices of "number tweaking", to remain within legal limits of radiation/contaminants in drinking water. IMO, radiation is not the only substance that endangers our drinking water, with all the fracking going on . This is outrageous and I wonder how thorough our local municipalities are, with the testing of water. If we could catch "red handed", these groups, cheating/changing the numbers, just to stay within "code", and get this into mainstream media, more and more people would start to pay attention.
http://tv.naturalnews.com/v.asp?v=37BDBB8A73220DADDB5D049DF98CE872
can't seem to embed. Just the link. apologies
soleil
4th June 2013, 20:44
im just happy i have a well (for now), and when we move. RO (or distiller) is going to be installed.
i just cant trust any (one) anymore.
Sidney
4th June 2013, 21:03
I also did not catch where exactly the radiation was coming from???? That seemed to be a non issue with that news clip. another Hmmmm..
GoodETxSG
4th June 2013, 21:09
Good grief between the Barium being dropped from the skies and the chemicals that TI buried illegally for the last several decades along with the other military contracting corporations all over TX, OK I am surprised that we all aren't glowing in the dark.
I will check this out and send it to my buddy that is a Chemist/Geologist/Metallurgist (Owns Metallurgical Engineering Services http://www.metengr.com) here in N. TX and see if there is any truth to this and if this can be verified.
I have asked a college student in OKC to bring down a soil sample from the air base area to test against claims of contamination from chemtrails and am still waiting for that to happen.
RunningDeer
4th June 2013, 21:13
Texas Government Covers Up RADIATION in DRINKING WATER!!!
8OAUnPdVtLw
Watch Count: 14,509
Uploaded on May 21, 2011
From KHou news Houston, TX
Government caught covering covering up cancer causing radioactive drinking water.
Thanks, Wantsthetruth74 :wave:
GoodETxSG
4th June 2013, 21:13
If we find out I would like a Sample Mailed to me. I can provide the steps in gathering the sample W/O contamination as well as gathering a controll sample from another source near by. I would be very interested if someone in an alleged contamination zone (Harris County,. TX) willing to do so I would appreciate it...
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/5/55/Map_of_Texas_highlighting_Harris_County.svg/631px-Map_of_Texas_highlighting_Harris_County.svg.png
I also did not catch where exactly the radiation was coming from???? That seemed to be a non issue with that news clip. another Hmmmm..
Sidney
4th June 2013, 21:23
Thanks for the embed Paula. XO : )
RunningDeer
4th June 2013, 21:27
Texas Drinking Water Makes Pipes And Plumbing Radioactive
N7DGK6QUhWc
Published on Jun 18, 2012
From: http://www.khou.com/news/local/-I-Tea...
Please click Like on my FaceBook page here: http://www.facebook.com/PigMineNews
Subscribe to http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c...
June 18, 2012 - Texas drinking water makes pipes and plumbing radioactive
by
Mark Greenblatt / KHOU 11 News
khou.com
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 9:49 PM
Updated Wednesday, May 18 at 5:16 PM
HOUSTON—Radiation has contaminated the underground pipes, water tanks, and plumbing that provide drinking water for much of Central Texas and the famed Texas Hill Country, according to concerned city officials in the region who have tested the pipes with Geiger counters.
According to local officials, the contamination comes from years of exposure to drinking water that already tests over federal legal limits for radioactive radium. Of even more concern, they say, is that any water quality testing is done before the water runs through the contaminated pipes that could be adding even more radiation.
"It's a serious concern," City of Brady Manager James Minor said. "These pipes have so much radioactivity in them, metal recycling places refer to them as they're 'hot.'"
Minor said the city made the discovery when it recently dug up older steel water pipes from the ground in an attempt to replace them. When the city brought the older pipes to a local recycling scrap yard, the scrap yard turned them away as "too radioactive" to recycle.
"It just brings lots of questions to my mind as far as, what's that doing to the people drinking it," he said, referring to the water that flows through the pipes.
Minor said he is speaking out in an attempt to do the right thing on behalf of his citizens, and those who live in the region.
"This is a regional problem for 40 to 50 other communities," he said. "This is a huge problem. We just happen to be the one standing here in front of the camera talking about it."
Full Article Here: http://www.khou.com/news/local/-I-Tea...
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S.
eric charles
4th June 2013, 21:28
The best thing to have to clean your water ............. chlorinate>>>> then carbon filter to remove chlorine , If water is hard (leaving stains on white clothes .... etc etc install a Water softener ) this removes all the hardened salts , also if you notice a brown sludge in lets say the tank of your toilet , well this is bacterial Iron , water tastes nasty , you will need what we Call an Iron filter , it injects Potassium Permanganate to seperate the Iron from the water , but if you chorinate at the well , the Chlorine kills it .............. and then like teradactyl has , an R.O witch is a Reverse Osmosis filtering system , You will only get a few gallons per day out of this , but is completely free of any contaminants ( NOT RADIATION , not that i know of ), if you have done as above . You must change those three filters in the R.O system like clockwork or else you can really get sick , sometimes they get so clogged with contamination , that it eventually releases it all into your water , BE WEARY , do the required maintenance as with anything you own , and you will be well on your way .
And if you want to really have an even better System , instead of chlorination , Install a UV light , they go for about 400$ plus parts and installation , but this kills 100% of all bacteria ... echoli, slamonella ..... etc , I prefer this waaaaaayyyyyy more then chlorination , but all depending on your local laws i cou,d be sent to jail mentioning not to chlorinate , and or/lose my license LOL , crazy how they puch that chlorine $hit on us
Sidney
4th June 2013, 21:33
All the while, China is TAKING our clean Great Lakes water. I wonder if Dutchsinse monitored that area,(in texas) during his trek across the country with his geiger counters after Fukushima.
RunningDeer
4th June 2013, 21:37
Obama Approves Raising Limit on Nuclear Radiation in Drinking Water and Ground Soil !
u2ZiQy7BPLk
Published on Apr 21, 2013
While no one was looking, paying attention or giving a damn , Obama has now raised the limit and the chances of you getting cancer !
http://worldtruth.tv/obama-approves-r...
From link above:
Civilian Cancer Deaths Expected to Skyrocket Following Radiological Incidents
The White House has given final approval for dramatically raising permissible radioactive levels in drinking water and soil following “radiological incidents,” such as nuclear power-plant accidents and dirty bombs. The final version, slated for Federal Register publication as soon as today, is a win for the nuclear industry which seeks what its proponents call a “new normal” for radiation exposure among the U.S population, according Public Employees for Environmental Responsibility (PEER).
• In water, the PAGs punt on an exact new standard and EPA “continues to seek input on this.” But the thrust of the PAGs is to give on-site authorities much greater “flexibility” in setting aside established limits; and
• Resolves an internal fight inside EPA between nuclear versus public health specialists in favor of the former. The PAGs are the product of Gina McCarthy, the assistant administrator for air and radiation whose nomination to serve as EPA Administrator is taken up this week by the Senate.
• Despite the years-long internal fight, this is the first public official display of these guides. This takes place as Japan grapples with these same issues in the two years following its Fukushima nuclear disaster.
“This is a public health policy only Dr. Strangelove could embrace. If this typifies the environmental leadership we can expect from Ms. McCarthy, then EPA is in for a long, dirty slog,” stated PEER Executive Director Jeff Ruch, noting that the EPA package lacks a cogent rationale, is largely impenetrable and hinges on a series of euphemistic “weasel words.”
“No compelling justification is offered for increasing the cancer deaths of Americans innocently exposed to corporate miscalculations several hundred-fold.”
Reportedly, the PAGs had been approved last fall but their publication was held until after the presidential election. The rationale for timing their release right before McCarthy’s confirmation hearing is unclear.
Since the PAGs guide agency decision-making and do not formally set standards or repeal statutory requirements, such as the Safe Drinking Water Act and Superfund, they will go into full effect following a short public comment period. Nonetheless, the PAGs will likely determine what actions take place on the ground in the days, weeks, months and, in some cases, years following a radiological emergency.
Source:
www.globalresearch.ca (http://www.globalresearch.ca/obama-approves-raising-permissible-levels-of-nuclear-radiation-in-drinking-water-civilian-cancer-deaths-expected-to-skyrocket/5331224)
www.nuclearfreeplanet.org
Sidney
4th June 2013, 21:37
Texas Drinking Water Makes Pipes And Plumbing Radioactive
N7DGK6QUhWc
Published on Jun 18, 2012
From: http://www.khou.com/news/local/-I-Tea...
Please click Like on my FaceBook page here: http://www.facebook.com/PigMineNews
Subscribe to http://www.youtube.com/subscription_c...
June 18, 2012 - Texas drinking water makes pipes and plumbing radioactive
by
Mark Greenblatt / KHOU 11 News
khou.com
Posted on May 17, 2011 at 9:49 PM
Updated Wednesday, May 18 at 5:16 PM
HOUSTON—Radiation has contaminated the underground pipes, water tanks, and plumbing that provide drinking water for much of Central Texas and the famed Texas Hill Country, according to concerned city officials in the region who have tested the pipes with Geiger counters.
According to local officials, the contamination comes from years of exposure to drinking water that already tests over federal legal limits for radioactive radium. Of even more concern, they say, is that any water quality testing is done before the water runs through the contaminated pipes that could be adding even more radiation.
"It's a serious concern," City of Brady Manager James Minor said. "These pipes have so much radioactivity in them, metal recycling places refer to them as they're 'hot.'"
Minor said the city made the discovery when it recently dug up older steel water pipes from the ground in an attempt to replace them. When the city brought the older pipes to a local recycling scrap yard, the scrap yard turned them away as "too radioactive" to recycle.
"It just brings lots of questions to my mind as far as, what's that doing to the people drinking it," he said, referring to the water that flows through the pipes.
Minor said he is speaking out in an attempt to do the right thing on behalf of his citizens, and those who live in the region.
"This is a regional problem for 40 to 50 other communities," he said. "This is a huge problem. We just happen to be the one standing here in front of the camera talking about it."
Full Article Here: http://www.khou.com/news/local/-I-Tea...
FAIR USE NOTICE: This video may contain copyrighted material. Such material is made available for educational purposes only. This constitutes a 'fair use' of any such copyrighted material as provided for in Title 17 U.S.C. section 106A-117 of the U.S.
Funny, they failed to mention where exactly those "hot" pipes ended up. This is a HUGE can of worms IMO.
ThePythonicCow
4th June 2013, 21:47
The best thing to have to clean your water ............. chlorinate>>>> then carbon filter to remove chlorine
The best thing to clean you water ... depends on what is in your water that you want to clean out :).
MadMax1
5th June 2013, 01:43
They put chlorine and fluiride in the water here In Australia and it tastes terrible to me, i grew up in the country and we always drank rain water from the tanks, when i moved to the city and tasted the water i spat it out. We use a jug that you fill up and it goes through a filter and ends up in the bottom of the water jug and it taste better and gets rid of chlorine taste without it i could not drink the town water supply. I don't know what else they use in our water but the chlorine and fluiride is a terrible combo surely there is a better way to clean the drinking water i just wish we had tanks or rain water.
Czarek
5th June 2013, 02:24
I wish we had ANY data on this. Assuming that since the woman in the video had thyroid problems, we are most likely dealing with higher levels of I-131. My question; where is this coming from??? I'm not sure what the limits are in the US but in Canada, drinking water limit is 100Bq/L of I-131. Reverse osmosis will take this out. Now, if we are dealing with tritium, you can't filter that out.
eric charles
6th June 2013, 18:19
The best thing to have to clean your water ............. chlorinate>>>> then carbon filter to remove chlorine
The best thing to clean you water ... depends on what is in your water that you want to clean out :).
Yes , im talking in a general sense though, a basic overall of what you could do in certain situations . But if you are going to l;eave a condescending remark like that ,
How about you tell me what to do If i have lets say 10 gpg of hardness in my water , Please tell me im dying to hear from you ? What should I do eh Paul ? You had me ligned up since I got here on this forum always leaving b.s remarks .
TargeT
6th June 2013, 19:19
Texas Government Covers Up RADIATION in DRINKING WATER!!!
8OAUnPdVtLw
Watch Count: 14,509
Uploaded on May 21, 2011
From KHou news Houston, TX
Government caught covering covering up cancer causing radioactive drinking water.
Thanks, Wantsthetruth74 :wave:
"Cancer causing" is a very bold statment.
Especially since its been proven that low levels of radiation are good for you & that radiation is only bad for you at levels found in bombs, nuclear reactor cores (while the reaction is happening) and medical offices. (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46819-A-video-they-won-t-want-you-to-see--Galen-Winsor-nuclear-scam-)
if you think you "know" about radiation based on what you have been told, well examine the sources that "told" you & see how much you trust them for other things....
I have been wearing a "hot" uranium pendant for two months, directly on my throat, there's no way the woman in this video got anywhere near the radiation levels I'm getting & I'm getting exposed to levels FAR below anything that could harm me.
Federal radiation level allowances are not there to help you, when has the federal government done ANYTHING truly good, think about that while you read this material.
Never stop critical thinking, especially when it comes to something on TV.
Sidney
6th June 2013, 19:52
Texas Government Covers Up RADIATION in DRINKING WATER!!!
8OAUnPdVtLw
Watch Count: 14,509
Uploaded on May 21, 2011
From KHou news Houston, TX
Government caught covering covering up cancer causing radioactive drinking water.
Thanks, Wantsthetruth74 :wave:
"Cancer causing" is a very bold statment.
Especially since its been proven that low levels of radiation are good for you & that radiation is only bad for you at levels found in bombs, nuclear reactor cores (while the reaction is happening) and medical offices. (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46819-A-video-they-won-t-want-you-to-see--Galen-Winsor-nuclear-scam-)
if you think you "know" about radiation based on what you have been told, well examine the sources that "told" you & see how much you trust them for other things....
I have been wearing a "hot" uranium pendant for two months, directly on my throat, there's no way the woman in this video got anywhere near the radiation levels I'm getting & I'm getting exposed to levels FAR below anything that could harm me.
Federal radiation level allowances are not there to help you, when has the federal government done ANYTHING truly good, think about that while you read this material.
Never stop critical thinking, especially when it comes to something on TV.
How does one know what type of radiations are good, or bad? What is the purpose of your "hot" pendant? Is it for healing?
TargeT
6th June 2013, 20:05
How does one know what type of radiations are good, or bad? What is the purpose of your "hot" pendant? Is it for healing?
Our bodies are very interesting things, of late I have been reflecting on the hidden wisdom of the saying "no pain no gain" (that's a bit extreme perhaps, but the implications still apply).
Hormesis - Healing Yourself with Low Dose Radiation (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?53597-Hormesis-Healing-Yourself-with-Low-Dose-Radiation&highlight=hormesis)
I’ve noticed this topic mentioned in a couple of posts, however there does not seem to be a thread focusing on this important topic... so I thought I'd start one.
Low dose radiation has been shown to be effective curing many diseases
Including cancer, eliminating pain and inflammation, and in anti aging programs. There is some evidence that some of its amazing healing properties may come from controlling or eliminating fungus in the body. There are formal studies in Russia which support this, however there haven't been any studies recently in other countries. This was not always the case, before the advent of 'modern' medicine low-dose radiation was being used to cure many diseases in the western world.
In my research it has become clear to me that it might just be the most effective and rapid cancer treatment that there is! There are no undesirable side effects, as in conventional and many alternative medicine treatments.
Because the diseases it effects are so widespread, I’ve decided to embark in a simple protocol for myself as a preventative aging measure. One of the wonderful things about hormesis is that it is very inexpensive.
A short list of diseases it has been shown to cure
Cancer
Macular degeneration and cataracts
Arthritus
Inflamation
Diabetes
Thyriod diseases (both too active and underactive)
Asthma
MS
Pain of all kinds in all places in the body
Many spinal injuries
Allergies
Autoimmune diseases of all types
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?53597-Hormesis-Healing-Yourself-with-Low-Dose-Radiation&highlight=hormesis
Books on the topic:
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/21SHMFMK9DL._.jpg
http://www.amazon.com/Underexposed-What-Radiation-Actually-Good/dp/0930073355
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41LuqRPFYvL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
http://www.amazon.com/Radiation-Reason-Impact-Science-Culture/dp/0956275613/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_1
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/41TFysh1arL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
http://www.amazon.com/Radiation-Hormesis-T-D-Luckey/dp/0849361591/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_2
http://ecx.images-amazon.com/images/I/416WkzndvhL._BO2,204,203,200_PIsitb-sticker-arrow-click,TopRight,35,-76_AA300_SH20_OU01_.jpg
http://www.amazon.com/Hormesis-Revolution-Biology-Toxicology-Medicine/dp/1607614944/ref=pd_sim_sbs_b_3
RunningDeer
6th June 2013, 21:58
Federal radiation level allowances are not there to help you, when has the federal government done ANYTHING truly good, think about that while you read this material.
Never stop critical thinking, especially when it comes to something on TV.
Just as a point of clarification...I'll assume your statement is directed to the general audience.
(updated post)
WhiteFeather
6th June 2013, 23:56
Good grief between the Barium being dropped from the skies and the chemicals that TI buried illegally for the last several decades along with the other military contracting corporations all over TX, OK I am surprised that we all aren't glowing in the dark.
I will check this out and send it to my buddy that is a Chemist/Geologist/Metallurgist (Owns Metallurgical Engineering Services http://www.metengr.com) here in N. TX and see if there is any truth to this and if this can be verified.
I have asked a college student in OKC to bring down a soil sample from the air base area to test against claims of contamination from chemtrails and am still waiting for that to happen.
A saying I heard by James Gilliland on an interview awhile back. "Whatever doesnt keal (kill) us, heals us".
TargeT
7th June 2013, 15:26
This is the third post in a row, and in less than two weeks, where you’ve pointed out things in a condescending tone.
If you had read those post carefully, you’d see they were out of context. Just so you know, I chose to take the high road, and put more effort in explaining your misperceptions. I will add, you’ve been polite once you see it. But...I’d rather you double check your assumptions. It’ll save me a lotta time and energy on this silly nonsense.
I have a bad habit of using something I read to spring board onto a soap box; I rarely respond directly to an individual & generally type with a larger audience in mind; my use of "you" in this case should be followed by (the reader).
I have a fairly good memory & based on what you (Paula) have shared here I would not question or suggest that your statements are based on a lack of.
Unfortunately I read this forum at work in a semi-distracted state while working on servers, storage, back ups, policy creation, employee hiring, quarterly reviews etc... I worded that response in a way that looked like it was targeting you directly, if it was targeted at anyone it could be considered the OP, and I was probably just allowing a bit of frustration to bleed through; the emphasis and underlining of the last statement seems a bit trite now.
Text is probably one of the worst methods of communication; I'll attempt to do better in the future!
RunningDeer
7th June 2013, 16:28
This is the third post in a row, and in less than two weeks, where you’ve pointed out things in a condescending tone.
If you had read those post carefully, you’d see they were out of context. Just so you know, I chose to take the high road, and put more effort in explaining your misperceptions. I will add, you’ve been polite once you see it. But...I’d rather you double check your assumptions. It’ll save me a lotta time and energy on this silly nonsense.
I have a bad habit of using something I read to spring board onto a soap box; I rarely respond directly to an individual & generally type with a larger audience in mind; my use of "you" in this case should be followed by (the reader).
I have a fairly good memory & based on what you (Paula) have shared here I would not question or suggest that your statements are based on a lack of.
Unfortunately I read this forum at work in a semi-distracted state while working on servers, storage, back ups, policy creation, employee hiring, quarterly reviews etc... I worded that response in a way that looked like it was targeting you directly, if it was targeted at anyone it could be considered the OP, and I was probably just allowing a bit of frustration to bleed through; the emphasis and underlining of the last statement seems a bit trite now.
Text is probably one of the worst methods of communication; I'll attempt to do better in the future!
I took the time to respond because like this post demonstrates, you are a person of integrity and heart. Thank you, Target. xo
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.