View Full Version : White House says chemical weapons used by Syrian Gov'
norman
13th June 2013, 21:57
Here we go, BBC radio just reported that the White House has now claimed it's red line has been crossed.
I googled it to try to provide a link for you but nothing came up!
Now what ?
EDIT:
whaw.. 5 minutes later there's at least a page of google results. take your pick.
thunder24
13th June 2013, 22:15
of course they need a distraction...and to get our troops out of the country?
Flash
13th June 2013, 22:24
Obama just announced USA would supply equipment and military forces to Syria, since the use of chemical was his extreme limit before interveningé
Although I do not approve war, less usage of chemical, I certainly do not approve USA going to war again. Russia and Turkey sill surely not appreciate much.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
14th June 2013, 00:06
The USA has its own chemical warfare to deal with: BP gulf of mexico scandal, Oregon GMO scandal (wow, thanks to Monsanto for both of these!), etc.
It's hard to believe that our gov't "cares" about Syrians in any capacity beyond the cubit litres of natural gas flowing through and past their country toward places like Austria (Nabucco Pipeline project).
naste.de.lumina
14th June 2013, 00:55
The USA has its own chemical warfare to deal with: BP gulf of mexico scandal, Oregon GMO scandal (wow, thanks to Monsanto for both of these!), etc.
It's hard to believe that our gov't "cares" about Syrians in any capacity beyond the cubit litres of natural gas flowing through and past their country toward places like Austria (Nabucco Pipeline project).
The U.S.A could not worry about Syria, but if Israel is concerned then it is another story.
norman
14th June 2013, 01:18
Lindsey Williams reckons the Syrian situation has put the big agenda over a year behind schedule ( and Qaddafi had already been a tough mission that took 3 months more than expected ).
Obama has probably been heavily leaned on to get the Syrian stand off over with, "or else".
Who knows, maybe the big nugget of info Glen Beck's whistleblower had was something that pushed Obama over the edge to commit to getting the muscle into Syria (blackmail ? ).
I don't know, but these key turning points always intrigue me.
edit:
It also comes in the week after the Bilderberg group met.
ghostrider
14th June 2013, 02:34
Last time i checked syria is not one of the states in America... isn't the president responsible for America ??? this nation building agenda must cease right now... our troops, money, equiptment is for America, not the rest of the bloody world ...
Kryztian
14th June 2013, 02:38
Bush really wanted war with Iraq and so we believe his story about "weapons of mass destruction". The White House is now hell bent on war with Syria. Can we believe the chemical weapons story?
Since the CIA has been active in Syria funding the rebels, Assad's popularity is up to 70%, a lot higher than Obama's is here. It makes one wonder reach nation should really be undergoing the regime change.
ghostrider
14th June 2013, 03:06
okay we lied about bengazi, fast and furious, and the NSA syping program but , this time we are telling the truth, really ... syria is using chemical weapons we read it on facebook ...they are using assault chemicals, with extra canisters, without a permit ...we have video of them wearing their backpacks carring assault chemicals, we just having trouble uploading them, we are waiting for the donation page to be completed first ...
naste.de.lumina
14th June 2013, 03:34
okay we lied about bengazi, fast and furious, and the NSA syping program but , this time we are telling the truth, really ... syria is using chemical weapons we read it on facebook ...they are using assault chemicals, with extra canisters, without a permit ...we have video of them wearing their backpacks carring assault chemicals, we just having trouble uploading them, we are waiting for the donation page to be completed first ...
I've read that the rebels have used chemical weapons, Israel nuked a bunker.
Israel uses uranium weapons and phosphorus.
Now they are talking about Assad is also using chemical weapons.
The first two options I know are true the latter needs proof, but I do not doubt.
So how does it look? Some can and others do not?
This is a war. Who owns the authority to allow or prohibit something?
The UN?
Complicated.
Chemical weapons or not, war kills and that is what has to stop.
ghostrider
14th June 2013, 03:40
killing doesn't solve anything, people just re-incarnate again and again ...killing just breeds bad karma on you ...
naste.de.lumina
14th June 2013, 03:43
killing doesn't solve anything, people just re-incarnate again and again ...killing just breeds bad karma on you ...
100% agree with you my friend.
norman
15th June 2013, 17:15
I just had a thought. I wonder what that 'evidence' was that a couple of journalists brought out of Syria a couple of weeks ago and was analyzed in Britain. I know it was physical samples from an area where a lot of Syrians became ill.
My fresh thought is that those Israeli air strikes may have included a deliberate strike to release chemicals from a weapons dump so that they would be spread around and detected as "evidence" of their use.
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.