PDA

View Full Version : NBC Cancels Senator Warren Glass-Steagall Interview Because of "Copyright Violations"



GlassSteagallfan
20th July 2013, 14:48
NBC Freaks Out over Glass-Steagall, Cancels Posting of Senator Warren Interview Because of "Copyright Violations"

July 20, 2013 • 9:28AM

Wall Street's dictatorship was in full view on Friday when NBC took supposed "legal action" over copyright issues, and pulled the YouTube video off the Internet of a combative interview where Sen. Elizabeth Warren (D-Mass.) smashed CNBC hosts on the issue of Glass-Steagall. In the first couple of days after the July 13 interview on CNBC's Squawk Box, Warren's own YouTube website had over 700,000 hits, and news of her KO'ing the CNBC team was going viral.

Senator Warren's YouTube has dozens of videos, but the Squawk Box appearance now has a black screen with the words, "This video contains content from NBC Universal, who has blocked it on copyright grounds. (sorry about that)"

One blog run by progressive Pat Cunningham was entitled "Elizabeth Warren Makes CNBC Hosts Look Like the Ninnies They Are," and reported, "The Internet has been afire in the past few days with accounts of how Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren made fools of her inquisitors on CNBC in a discussion of the Glass-Steagall Act, a measure regulating banks. Cunningham's blog is one of the dozens of websites that still have the five-minute-plus feisty interview video available.

At one point, CNBC's Brian Sullivan began yelling at Warren that she is covering up the bankruptcy of Continental Illinois, which happened before Glass-Steagall was repealed. After Sullivan gave a lying, fractured version of the Conti story, Warren shot back, "No! that is just wrong. Look at the history."

The Cunningham site and others have also transcribed excerpts of the interview, provided below:

ELIZABETH WARREN: From 1797 to 1933, the American banking system crashed about every 15 years. In 1933, we put good reforms in place, for which Glass-Steagall was the centerpiece, and from 1933 to the early 1980s, that's a 50 year period, we didn't have any of that, none. We kept the system steady and secure.

And it was only as we started deregulating, you start hitting the S&L crisis, and what did we do? We deregulated some more. And then you hit long-term capital management at the end of the '90s, and what did we do as a country, this country continued to deregulate more. And then we hit the big crash in 2008.

You are not going to defend the proposition that regulation can never work, it did work.

CNBC's BRIAN SULLIVAN: I didn't say regulation never worked, Senator. By far and away, and I agree, there were fewer bank failures in that time after Glass-Steagall.

WARREN: Fewer, as in of the big ones, zero!

**************************



Elizabeth Warren makes CNBC hosts look like the ninnies they are

July 17, 2013 at 9:14 am by Pat Cunningham

The Internet has been afire in the past few days with accounts of how Massachusetts Sen. Elizabeth Warren made fools of her inquisitors on CNBC in a discussion of the Glass-Steagall Act, a measure regulating banks.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6rnsLNvXzM

risveglio
20th July 2013, 15:20
a little off topic, but why is Warren such a war monger?

spiritguide
20th July 2013, 15:27
a little off topic, but why is Warren such a war monger?

Could you elaborate on this statement? How and what allows you to percieve her as a war monger? Please share.

Peace!

risveglio
20th July 2013, 15:56
a little off topic, but why is Warren such a war monger?

Could you elaborate on this statement? How and what allows you to percieve her as a war monger? Please share.

Peace!

Seem appears to be convinced on agression towards Iran. Maybe she is just in the pockets of AIPAC? I could be wrong though I don't know if this is the thread for a discussion.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/24/elizabeth-warren-iran-bob-kerrey_n_1449926.html

This is a year old so I don't know if her stances have changed on war with Iran. Also not sure why it showed up in my news feed today.

Lifebringer
20th July 2013, 18:56
She's not a warmonger. John McCain is, but what has that to do with reform on Wall Street?

If that's where the war is that you're talking about, than I say "bring it on, and let the penguin walkers in handcuffs, get it on."

Lifebringer
20th July 2013, 19:01
Perhaps AIPAC info is all that's getting to the Houses?

I know Elizabeth isn't a warmongerer, but she's no punk when it comes to nukes, while we are winding them down. you know they are always saying Iran is helping Syrians, Iran is helping Libyans, Iran is helping Alqueida. BS all through and through. The UN knows it's the weapons manufacturer companies and big oil causing all this riff for resources and capitalizing on profits off the deaths in other nations.

Perhaps that's why Prince got shot. They are taking it straight to the leaders/owners, and not the ones just following orders.

spiritguide
20th July 2013, 19:32
a little off topic, but why is Warren such a war monger?

Could you elaborate on this statement? How and what allows you to percieve her as a war monger? Please share.

Peace!

Seem appears to be convinced on agression towards Iran. Maybe she is just in the pockets of AIPAC? I could be wrong though I don't know if this is the thread for a discussion.
http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2012/04/24/elizabeth-warren-iran-bob-kerrey_n_1449926.html

This is a year old so I don't know if her stances have changed on war with Iran. Also not sure why it showed up in my news feed today.

My perception is the huffington post's reliability does not pass my sniff test. Just look at their reaction to the Zimmerman case.

Peace!

Ba-ba-Ra
20th July 2013, 22:22
Elizabeth Warren has consistently and with vigor fought the good fight against the banking system. She is to be applauded.

risveglio
21st July 2013, 18:07
Thanks for all the answers. I have done quite a bit of research and it does seem she is quite the war monger, right up there with McCain on Iran. Maybe that is why they are working together on a bill that everyone thinks will fix everything but in the end won't make too much of a difference. Point is mute though since I would never vote for either one of them.