90% of Cancer is Curable...

[foreverfan]

Knowing This Information May Save a Loved One's Life.

This website www.CancerTutor.com (http://www.cancertutor.com/) lists most of the alternative cancer treatments and goes into great detail about what works and which therapies work best together. It has invaluable information and is a must read for everyone.

It even tells you what causes Type II Diabetes (http://www.cancertutor.com/Diabetes/Diabetes_Type_II.htm) and how to cure it.
____________________________________________

Did you know that "cure rates" for some kinds of cancer
can range from 3% to 90%? Cancer treatments with 90% cure rates have existed for decades. This article will talk about the cancer treatments with 90% cure rates. So fasten your seat belt and get ready to learn about a world you didn't know existed!!

The problem with finding the 90% cure rates is information. The problem is getting people to understand that the media doesn't care who has the highest cure rate, they only care who has the biggest bank account. The media does not glorify the best cancer treatments, they glorify the most profitable cancer treatments.

www.CancerTutor.com (http://www.cancertutor.com/) will describe how virtually unknown treatments with 90% cure rates work. These treatments can target cancer cells and thus they can be given in very high doses because they do no harm to healthy cells.

Safe and gentle cancer treatments, with 90% cure rates, have existed for decades, but medical doctors rarely use the safe and effective treatments and instead are quite content to use cancer treatments which have less than a 3%, 5-year cure rate (Clinical Oncology (2004) 16: 549-560)!!

Let me say this in another way: in five years after diagnosis, 97% of the cancer patients treated with standard cancer treatments are dead.

Why have the media's "investigative journalists" not glorified these amazing cancer treatments? The products used are not as profitable to the media, by a wide margin, as current treatments. In fact, the propaganda machine of the media has totally ignored other treatments, as has the medical establishment. As a result, the general public cannot believe that someone could have a cure rate that high!!

Because of the media... almost all cancer patients, when they are diagnosed with cancer, cannot get filled with chemotherapy fast enough. The media is owned by multi-billionaires, just like the pharmaceutical industry is owned by multi-billionaires. These multi-billionaires are good friends and they have their own "clubs" for the ultra-rich, such as the Bilderberg Group and Trilateral Commission.

Unlike the multi-billionaires in the media and medical establishment, who disdain the "common people," more and more cancer reseachers today are not as interested in the money and instead are interested in helping cancer patients.

The good news is today they are not following in the footsteps of the highly profitable treatments of current medicine. They are pushing forward with even newer treatments based on new discoveries.

At the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, or ICRF, we are proud to say that we are part of the continuing heritage and we have made discoveries that cause many others like us, to be blacklisted by the media because we represent treatments that are in the best interests of cancer patients, not profits.

[Carmen]

I'd never be without black salve and my rife machine for cancer and everything else.

[foreverfan]

There are Three major ways to cure cancer (http://www.cancertutor.com/Articles/What_Causes_Cancer.html):

1) Safely target and kill the cancer cells,
2) Kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells,
3) Kill the microbes that are causing the immune system to be weak (and this includes the microbes in the organs and the microbes in the bloodstream).

[foreverfan]

A discussion about what causes cancer at the cellular level is a totally different subject than talking about what causes cancer at the systemic level.

What Causes Cancer - Systemic Level

Everyone has cancer cells in their body, so why does one person never get diagnosed with cancer and another person is diagnosed with cancer?

Cancer is almost always caused by the same multi-step sequence of events.

First, nasty microbes get inside of the organs and make their homes there. These microbes generally come from meat that was not adequately cooked, but they can come from other sources.

Second, these microbes intercept glucose which was headed for the cells in the organs.

Third, these microbes excrete (as waste products) mycotoxins, which are highly acid and totally worthless to the cells.

Fourth, because the cells don't get the food they need (because it has been intercepted), and because they are living in a sea of filth (i.e. mycotoxins), the cells in the organ become weak.

Fifth, organs are made exclusively of cells. In other words, if you took all of the cells out of an organ, there would be no organ. Thus, because the cells in the organ(s) are weak, the organ(s) are weak.

Sixth, because one or more major organs are weak the immune system becomes weak. Actually, the microbes weaken the immune system both directly and indirectly.

Seventh, because the immune system is weak it cannot kill enough cancer cells and the cancer cells grow out of control.

[foreverfan]

While many natural cancer treatments do very well against cancer, what is missing in many natural cancer treatment protocols is getting rid of the microbes in the organs, which is the "root cause" of most cases of cancer.

In many cases the immune system can get rid of these microbes, but in fact some types of tapeworms, flukes and fungus, etc. cannot be killed by the immune system for one reason or another (e.g. the microbes are not accessible by the immune system).

By getting rid of the microbes in the organs, plus doing the normal cancer treatments, the balance (i.e. a strong immune system and a low number of cancer cells) is restrored enough to keep the cancer from coming back. The patient is cured because their immune system has been fixed and the number of cancer cells (by using special protocols) has been reduced!! The cancer will not come back as long as the patient watches their diet.

The approach of orthodox medicine, however, is to severely damage the immune system with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. This makes the imbalance even worse because these things damage the immune system and do a very poor job of targeting the cancer cells and do an even worse job of killing the microbes in the organs. Orthodox cancer treatments also kill many healthy cells and can damage organs, the lymph system, etc. Is it any wonder the cancer always seems to "come back" after surgery or chemotherapy?

[foreverfan]

What Causes Cancer - Cellular Level

So far we have only talked about what causes cancer at the systemic level. So what causes an individual cell to become cancerous? How does a normal cell, which is not cancerous, become cancerous?

In a normal cell, molecules called ATP (adenosine triphosphate) provide the energy of the cell. ATP molecules are created inside the mitochondria which are inside of every human cell. In fact, there are thousands of mitochondria inside of every human cell.

The normal process of creating ATP molecules is this (this is highly simplified):
1) Glucose gets inside of the cell from the bloodstream,
2) Some of the glucose is converted into pyruvate [this is about a 10 step process],
3) Pyruvate gets inside of the mitochondria,
4) Once inside the mitochondria, pyruvate is at the beginning of two sequential chemical reactions (the Citric Acid Cycle or Krebs Cycle and then the Electron Transport Chain which spins-off about half-way through the Citric Acid Cycle). It is these two cycles which create most of the ATP molecules in the cell.

Cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than a normal cell. Thus, a person would logically expect a cancer cell to create 15 times more ATP molecules than a normal cell.

But in reality, cancer cells create virtually zero ATP molecules!! Cancer cells are ATP molecule starved and they have to revert to fermentation to create what little ATP molecules they create.

With so much glucose there should be an abundance of ATP molecules!! Why do cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose and yet not be able to create a significant amount of ATP molecules?

The thing that blocks the production of ATP molecules is a very special pleomorphic bacteria that is inside the cancer cells!!. While everyone has H. pylori bacteria in their body (generally in their digestive tract), how does H. pylori get inside of a healthy cell? Generally it doesn't. But in some cases an acidic diet can make this bacteria highly aggressive and it can literally drill itself inside of a normal cell to get away from the acidity in the blood, as discovered by Robert O. Young, PhD.

The bacteria blocks ATP production in two different ways:
First, bacteria eat glucose so as the bacteria proliferate inside the cell (by the way, a bacteria is roughly the same size as a mitochondria) they intercept more and more glucose. This means less and less pyruvate is made because there is less glucose to be converted into pyruvate. This means less ATP is made!!

Secondly, microbes excrete mycotoxins, which are highly acidic and totally worthless molecules.

As one ICRF (i.e. the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.) researcher put it: the mitochondria, instead of "swimming" in a sea of pyruvate are swimming in a sea of mycotoxins!!

In one of its smaller states it is the size of a virus and can enter inside of the cell nucleus. Like a virus, which gets inside of the nucleus, the DNA of the cancer microbe can interact with the DNA inside the cell nucleus and change the DNA structure of the cell.

The cancer microbe also excretes enzymes that coat the outside of the cancer cells. This coating of enzymes blocks the immune system from identifying the cancer cells as being cancer cells!!

It was also discovered, around the 1950s, that natural pancreatic enzymes, made in the pancreas, could dissolve this protein coating so the immune system could identify and thus kill the cancer cells.

This discovery in turn led to the advice that natural cancer treatments should prohibit the cancer patient from eating meats or other foods that the pancreatic enzymes cut apart. In other words, these foods "use up" the pancreatic enzymes while in the stomach so less of them are available to expose cancer cells to the immune system.

When a cancer patient is using pancreatic enzymes in their protocol, they should not eat meat or dairy products. In fact, no cancer patient should eat very much meat and they should not eat or drink any dairy products (for multiple reasons).

[Keltikmuse]

I'd never be without black salve and my rife machine for cancer and everything else. Carmen could you tell me what this is please ?

[apollo41]

check out rick Simpsons, hemp/cannabis oil..proven to work on nearly every cancer going..

[Swan]

I'd never be without black salve and my rife machine for cancer and everything else.

Hi Carmen,

May I ask which Rife Machine you have, as I have been thinking about getting one...

[foreverfan]

I'd never be without black salve and my rife machine for cancer and everything else.

Black Salve works great with most skin cancers but the problems still remain with the microbes in the body. You can use Black Salve for many other skin problems. Ichthammol Cream (http://www.ebay.com/itm/BLACK-DRAWING-SALVE-PINE-TAR-HEALING-HERBS-4-OZ-/140500498754?_trksid=p3284.m263&_trkparms=algo%3DSIC%26its%3DI%26itu%3DUCI%252BIA% 252BUA%252BFICS%252BUFI%26otn%3D21%26pmod%3D180971 080869%26ps%3D54)=Black Salve can be purchased at most drug stores.

http://i.ebayimg.com/t/BLACK-DRAWING-SALVE-WITH-PINE-TAR-HEALING-HERBS-4-OZ-/00/s/MTIwMFgxNjAw/$(KGrHqVHJFYE88fNNTP+BPZeLLYS)g~~60_58.JPG



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MsjVn9tGMoM

[Marin]

I'd never be without black salve and my rife machine for cancer and everything else.

Hi Carmen,

May I ask which Rife Machine you have, as I have been thinking about getting one...

I've often wondered this too. Here's a link that might be helpful:
http://www.rifevideos.com/frequency_generators.html


"IMPORTANT: Almost all of the gas tube frequency generators on the market today do not use RF and do not have the ability to output Dr. Rife's original frequencies. The same standard is used on these gas filled Ray tube instruments. If they cannot output Dr. Rife's original frequencies then they are not included in this list.

Just do a search with google or any other search engine to find the websites of the various frequency generators listed below.


Frequency generators that have the abilty to output all of Rife's high RF frequencies (with gas filled light tube).

GB4000 & M.O.P.A Amplifier (118 RF watts average power 460 peak power)



Frequency generators that have the ability to output all of Rife's frequencies and his higher harmonic frequencies which Philip Hoyland used to 20,000,000 hertz (without gas filled light tube).

Agilent 33210A (0.20 watts)

B&K 4040a (0.20 watts)

Fluke 271 (0.20 watts)

GB4000 (2 watts) with SR-4 RF (Radio Frequency) Amplifier (10 watts)

F-165 (1.65 watts)

F-175 (1.65 watts)"


I've seen several threads about Rife machines on Avalon but not a comprehensive list of the actual machines that members have used successfully. I think this would be helpful. :)

[778 neighbour of some guy]

Apricot kernels ( B17, Laetrile) Cheap as dirt, check out Edward J griffin on this, plenty of videos on YouTube.

22181

22182

22183

22184

How to, hemp oil.

2TRc99VhHRY

[Carmen]

Okay, I was first introduced to black salve through a friend of mine who was regularly having bits removed from her body because of recurring skin cancer, ( her diet is not ideal!) Anyway she had a close relationship with her surgeon because of the frequency of these procedures. Unfortunately a skin cancer on her face had gone into her jaw and her surgeon was in despair as an operation would have ruined one side of her face to get it out. She commented to her doctor that she was going to see a" witch doctor"! Her surgeon said that she had nothing to lose doing that. That's when she discovered black salve. She applied it to her face and it pulled the cancer right from her jaw and she's had no more reoccurrence of cancer there. I then got myself black salve and have successfully used it on myself and also my daughter.

Elaine Hollingsworth has a fabulous DVD out on black salve. It's called "One answer to cancer". I highly recommend it.

The Rife Machine I have is called an energy wellness machine and it passes electrical current at various frequencies through the body. My husband had throat cancer and was given a 50% survival rate. He uses the Rife Machine every day. His cancer was 10 years ago. I recently had pneumonia and successfully got rid of it through the machine without resorting to anti-biotics. Our enlightened doctor has a rife machine at her clinic for people to use. So, with the rife machine and black salve I don't have a need for a doctor and I take no drugs which is possibly unusual for a sixty three year old.

[The Truth Is In There]

There are Three major ways to cure cancer (http://www.cancertutor.com/Articles/What_Causes_Cancer.html):

1) Safely target and kill the cancer cells,
2) Kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells,
3) Kill the microbes that are causing the immune system to be weak (and this includes the microbes in the organs and the microbes in the bloodstream).

their therapies may work to a certain degree but they haven't understood the cause for cancer. cancer cells don't have to be killed. microbes don't have to be killed. cancer is not an attack on the body by microbes or a mistake of nature.

[PurpleLama]

Then, there's the good ol' castor oil pack....


Castor oil packs are a traditional holistic treatment for a range of conditions, such as: cholecystitis (inflammation of the gall bladder), epilepsy, various liver conditions such as cirrhosis and torpid liver, scleroderma, headaches, appendicitis, arthritis, incoordination between assimilations and eliminations, colitis, intestinal disorders such as stricture and colon impaction, ulcers, incoordination between nervous systems, neuritis, toxemia, chronic fatigue syndrome, IBS, heavy menstruation, healing surgical or other wounds, fibromyalgia, acne, constipation, bone spurs, dissolve any sort of growth, lump, tumor or cyst (diseases caused by “Blood Stagnation in Traditional Chinese Medicine), psoriasis, gout, kidney stones, hypertension, high blood pressure and serves to relieve abdominal congestion due to sluggishness of the lymphatic circulation.And this list is by no means complete!

Between castor oil, alka thyme, and atomidine, I have found the cure for almost everything but my own stupidity.

[foreverfan]

There are Three major ways to cure cancer (http://www.cancertutor.com/Articles/What_Causes_Cancer.html):

1) Safely target and kill the cancer cells,
2) Kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells,
3) Kill the microbes that are causing the immune system to be weak (and this includes the microbes in the organs and the microbes in the bloodstream).

their therapies may work to a certain degree but they haven't understood the cause for cancer. cancer cells don't have to be killed. microbes don't have to be killed. cancer is not an attack on the body by microbes or a mistake of nature.

First off who is they and do "they" actually want to cure anything?

The material presented on CancerTutor has quite a few protocols that can work. The consensuses from their research is that Microbes seem to be at the root of the cause although the rabbit hole goes much deeper and there are different plans of attack.

[The Truth Is In There]

There are Three major ways to cure cancer (http://www.cancertutor.com/Articles/What_Causes_Cancer.html):

1) Safely target and kill the cancer cells,
2) Kill the microbes inside the cancer cells and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells,
3) Kill the microbes that are causing the immune system to be weak (and this includes the microbes in the organs and the microbes in the bloodstream).

their therapies may work to a certain degree but they haven't understood the cause for cancer. cancer cells don't have to be killed. microbes don't have to be killed. cancer is not an attack on the body by microbes or a mistake of nature.

First off who is they and do "they" actually want to cure anything?

The material presented on CancerTutor has quite a few protocols that can work. The consensuses from their research is that Microbes seem to be at the root of the cause although the rabbit hole goes much deeper and there are different plans of attack.

"they" are the people who develop these cures. if they didn't want to cure anything they wouldn't develop cures. most of them are certainly well-meaning but they operate from a basis of ignorance (it happens, i did the same for a long time but one never stops learning so by all means, keep searching and expand your knowledge base!).

i can assure you that microbes are not the problem. in fact, the body uses these microbes in the healing period. that microbes are there where a cancer is doesn't mean they caused it, or would you say that the fire fighters cause fires because they're always there when something burns?

[GlassSteagallfan]

According to Dr Bob Beck, by electrofying the blood, no cancer can attach to the cells. All organs are made of cells, as stated above.

[GlassSteagallfan]

---

National Cancer Institute To Narrow Definition of Cancer To Discourage Treatment

August 1, 2013 • 9:56AM

If we call it a different name, they won't think it's so bad. That seems to be the approach of a National Cancer Institute working group, whose recommendations were published in the prestigious Journal of the American Medical Association (JAMA).

Or, as a lead New York Times article put it, "A group of experts advising the nation's premier cancer research institution has recommended changing the definition of cancer and eliminating the word from some common diagnoses as part of sweeping changes in the nation's approach to cancer detection and treatment.

"The recommendations, from a working group of the National Cancer Institute, were published on Monday in The Journal of the American Medical Association. They say, for instance, that some premalignant conditions, like one that affects the breast called ductal carcinoma in situ, which many doctors agree is not cancer, should be renamed to exclude the word carcinoma so that patients are less frightened and less likely to seek what may be unneeded and potentially harmful treatments that can include the surgical removal of the breast....

"The impetus behind the call for change is a growing concern among doctors, scientists and patient advocates that hundreds of thousands of men and women are undergoing needless and sometimes disfiguring and harmful treatments for premalignant and cancerous lesions that are so slow growing they are unlikely to ever cause harm...."

As EIR's Marcia Merry notes, it is the case that many such conditions may not require immediate aggressive treatment. But they must be monitored — regularly and frequently. Yet, under the nation's collapsing healthcare "system," more and more of the requisite monitoring facilities are themselves being shut down.

Source (http://larouchepac.com/node/27574)