Spike
2nd September 2013, 20:53
Teleportation just got easier—but not for you, unfortunately
http://phys.org/news/2013-08-teleportation-easierbut.html
n fact, something known as "quantum teleportation" became a reality in 1997. This first demonstration was for particles of light (photons). Since then, physicists have also applied teleportation to other very small things, for example single atoms.
So when can we expect to just teleport ourselves to our chosen destination? You might want to sit down for this.
The first step to teleporting a person is measuring and recording the position, direction of motion and energy of every particle in the body, which would require more data storage than will ever be available – much, much more.
In fact, a conservative estimate would mean you'd need about 10 to the power of 22 gigabytes (1 followed by 22 zeros) of hard drive space. That's a stack of hard drives about 20 light-years tall.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was digging in the old john titor posts found this
How far have computers and software progressed in 2036?
Good question! I would say the biggest difference is in the reliability of the hardware and software. It absolutely amazes me how willing people are here to accept computer and software failures on such a regular basis. I was very surprised to see how prolific it is. You can look forward to very stringent manufacturing parameters and programming discipline. Think back to the early days of the computer and how much work and cleverness it took to fit those programs into such small areas of memory. Has more and cheaper memory brought better programs or just more programs?
As far as technical specifics, I'm afraid I cannot go into too much detail. However, I will tell you that processor speed and memory size take dramatic leaps forward.
JT: Hydrogen fuel cells and more efficient solar cells are big deals. Computer technology and software get MUCH better.
Flawed Diamonds Could Store Quantum Data 2011
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/quantum-diamonds/
Ultrafast Chips that Run on Light: Nanoswitch Breakthrough Brings Us Closer
http://techland.time.com/2012/09/12/ultrafast-chips-that-run-on-light-nanoswitch-breakthrough-brings-us-closer/
This is what john was talking about. I think hes real some things have happened and other things didn't or haven't yet.
The VGL variable gravity lock he was talking about in (2000) we kind of already have one its in a satellite able to detect gravity fluctuations called grace and twin grails that orbit the moon.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/12/how-twin-grails-use-gravity-to-map-the-moons-interior/
JT: Miniaturizing the clocks and sensors, creating clever ways to vent x-rays and creating a computer system dependable enough
to calculate the changes required to the field were the main challenges. There are no missing pieces, just missing energy
levels and a few very interesting subatomic particles
JT: Heck, we haven't even touched on "Z" field compression yet
Science from the Center of the Earth to Black Holes
http://www.sandia.gov/z-machine/
my train of thought with the cern is since they were able to capture a anti hydrogen protons what about holding a few higgs send them over to the z pinch to be compressed? If enough mass is compressed would it make a black hole?
A Great Mystery Comes Into Focus: Antimatter Trapped For 16 Minutes
http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2011/06/08/137028191/binding-the-universe-s-other-half-anti-matter-trapped-for-15-minutes
John also said some thing about G.E reinventing the jet engine. Ill find the post tomorrow unless some one has it.
This might be what he was talking about
GE9X the worlds next great engine
http://www.geaviation.com/newengine/
JT: The mass of the singularities is that of a small mountain.
took some figuring out I got 9,780,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 electron volts or 9.7801 x 10 to the power of 36.
thats 9.780 undecillion they dont even have it in volt terms guess we are going to have to wait until the Very Large Hadron Collider is built dont have a date but after 2020.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Hadron_Collider
the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider is the next one up going to be built in 2020
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Luminosity_Large_Hadron_Collider
The upgrade aims at increasing the luminosity of the machine by a factor of 10
http://phys.org/news/2013-08-teleportation-easierbut.html
n fact, something known as "quantum teleportation" became a reality in 1997. This first demonstration was for particles of light (photons). Since then, physicists have also applied teleportation to other very small things, for example single atoms.
So when can we expect to just teleport ourselves to our chosen destination? You might want to sit down for this.
The first step to teleporting a person is measuring and recording the position, direction of motion and energy of every particle in the body, which would require more data storage than will ever be available – much, much more.
In fact, a conservative estimate would mean you'd need about 10 to the power of 22 gigabytes (1 followed by 22 zeros) of hard drive space. That's a stack of hard drives about 20 light-years tall.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
I was digging in the old john titor posts found this
How far have computers and software progressed in 2036?
Good question! I would say the biggest difference is in the reliability of the hardware and software. It absolutely amazes me how willing people are here to accept computer and software failures on such a regular basis. I was very surprised to see how prolific it is. You can look forward to very stringent manufacturing parameters and programming discipline. Think back to the early days of the computer and how much work and cleverness it took to fit those programs into such small areas of memory. Has more and cheaper memory brought better programs or just more programs?
As far as technical specifics, I'm afraid I cannot go into too much detail. However, I will tell you that processor speed and memory size take dramatic leaps forward.
JT: Hydrogen fuel cells and more efficient solar cells are big deals. Computer technology and software get MUCH better.
Flawed Diamonds Could Store Quantum Data 2011
http://www.wired.com/wiredscience/2011/03/quantum-diamonds/
Ultrafast Chips that Run on Light: Nanoswitch Breakthrough Brings Us Closer
http://techland.time.com/2012/09/12/ultrafast-chips-that-run-on-light-nanoswitch-breakthrough-brings-us-closer/
This is what john was talking about. I think hes real some things have happened and other things didn't or haven't yet.
The VGL variable gravity lock he was talking about in (2000) we kind of already have one its in a satellite able to detect gravity fluctuations called grace and twin grails that orbit the moon.
http://arstechnica.com/science/2012/12/how-twin-grails-use-gravity-to-map-the-moons-interior/
JT: Miniaturizing the clocks and sensors, creating clever ways to vent x-rays and creating a computer system dependable enough
to calculate the changes required to the field were the main challenges. There are no missing pieces, just missing energy
levels and a few very interesting subatomic particles
JT: Heck, we haven't even touched on "Z" field compression yet
Science from the Center of the Earth to Black Holes
http://www.sandia.gov/z-machine/
my train of thought with the cern is since they were able to capture a anti hydrogen protons what about holding a few higgs send them over to the z pinch to be compressed? If enough mass is compressed would it make a black hole?
A Great Mystery Comes Into Focus: Antimatter Trapped For 16 Minutes
http://www.npr.org/blogs/13.7/2011/06/08/137028191/binding-the-universe-s-other-half-anti-matter-trapped-for-15-minutes
John also said some thing about G.E reinventing the jet engine. Ill find the post tomorrow unless some one has it.
This might be what he was talking about
GE9X the worlds next great engine
http://www.geaviation.com/newengine/
JT: The mass of the singularities is that of a small mountain.
took some figuring out I got 9,780,100,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000,000 electron volts or 9.7801 x 10 to the power of 36.
thats 9.780 undecillion they dont even have it in volt terms guess we are going to have to wait until the Very Large Hadron Collider is built dont have a date but after 2020.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Very_Large_Hadron_Collider
the High Luminosity Large Hadron Collider is the next one up going to be built in 2020
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/High_Luminosity_Large_Hadron_Collider
The upgrade aims at increasing the luminosity of the machine by a factor of 10