PDA

View Full Version : Iran Plots Revenge, U.S. Says



Leon
7th September 2013, 06:30
Is't it all getting convenient now...

12 or so years ago there were 6 countries not in the NWO (Bilderberg group) of money.

So far they managed to find excuses for war and start war with these, the fallen ones are:

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya they are now under NWO control.

Guess which countries are next????

Syria (CIA is involved as per usual to bring the fight home)

Iran (Slowly the excuses with be brought forward to start a war here)

North Korea (Same as the above)

Question is who will be left to start war with? there are no more countries after this.

My guess is WE are, this is why the UK is preparing for Military service as they did just before WW1 (1914) and WWII (1937)

Is it not time to wake up, take your blindfold off as this will effect everyone in the world...

WhiteFeather
7th September 2013, 11:36
Once the hitmen from america run ouf of resources or countrys to steal from and the proverbial oil well runs dry. Then we will truly see the sh!t hitting the economy fan in the US. Its just a matter of time. But I envision a retaliation soon. Cause Bullys dont last too long without getting knocked down on their ass. Paybacks a Bitch.

Atlas
7th September 2013, 14:58
Can you explain who said that ?

GVOjt1_Grgs

Leon
7th September 2013, 15:25
Here you go:

http://finance.yahoo.com/news/iran-plots-revenge-u-says-004600132.html;_ylt=A2KJ3CaBRCtSgx8AcyXQtDMD

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A2KLqIOtRCtSCmkABNT7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTByZWc0dGJtBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDBGdwb3MDMQ--?p=Iran+Plots+Revenge%2C+U.S.+Says&vid=4759e45dc2dd977cfc081d440a3d85f1&l=1%3A42&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts3.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DVJ.412839058198%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.liveleak.com%2Fview%3Fi%3Da83_1378492738&tit=Iran+plotting+attack+on+US&c=0&sigr=11dbvuapi&age=0&&tt=b

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A2KLqIPXRCtSCmkAMtn7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTByZ2N0cmxpBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDBGdwb3MDMg--?p=Iran+Plots+Revenge%2C+U.S.+Says&vid=bede459bd7bdadb481cde168d41ad9ae&l=00%3A32&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DV.4795744444878004%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.bing.com%2Fvideos%2Fwatch%2Fvideo%2Firan-plots-revenge-attacks-if-u-s-strikes-syria%2F3xzd2h1s&tit=Iran+Plots+Revenge+Attacks+if+U.S.+Strikes+Syria&c=1&sigr=12vku2ef4&age=0&&tt=b

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A2KLqIPXRCtSCmkAM9n7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTByN2RnbHFoBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDBGdwb3MDMw--?p=Iran+Plots+Revenge%2C+U.S.+Says&vid=abf5927bc91c419fb44a1356c9e9de07&l=&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts2.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DVJ.412838528801%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.latimes.com%2Fvideogallery%2F77296218%2FVideo-Iran-plots-revenge-attacks-if-U-S-strikes-Syria&tit=Video%3A+Iran+plots+revenge+attacks+if+U.S.+strikes+Syria&c=2&sigr=1320r95k8&&tt=b

http://video.search.yahoo.com/video/play;_ylt=A2KLqIPXRCtSCmkANdn7w8QF;_ylu=X3oDMTByNDY3bGRuBHNlYwNzcgRzbGsDdmlkBHZ0aWQDBGdwb3MDNQ--?p=Iran+Plots+Revenge%2C+U.S.+Says&vid=32b4b3c2052457fdf4942056ef2a95d1&l=3%3A34&turl=http%3A%2F%2Fts1.mm.bing.net%2Fth%3Fid%3DVJ.412846064176%26pid%3D15.1&rurl=http%3A%2F%2Fwww.cnn.com%2Fvideo%2F%3F%2Fvideo%2Fbestoftv%2F2013%2F09%2F06%2Ferin-official-says-iran-may-be-planning-to-retaliate-if-u-s-strikes-syria.cnn&tit=Report%3A+Iran+plots+revenge+strike+on+US&c=4&sigr=142id90kq&age=0&&tt=b

Just because I normally won't reveal a source, does not mean it's not true...
Once a source is revealed it cannot give any more information!

Atlas
7th September 2013, 16:03
Thanks, I followed your link, the source is The Wall Street Journal, don't worry, they will keep on giving information:

"The U.S. has intercepted (an) Iranian message [...] from Qasem Soleimani (listed by the United States as a terrorist) to Iranian-supported Shiite militia groups in Iraq, according to U.S. officials.

In it, Mr. Soleimani said Shiite groups must be prepared to respond with force after a U.S. strike on Syria. Iranian officials didn't respond to requests for comment."

Officials said... and Leon repeated.

By the way, how do you know the CIA didn't pay Julian E. Barnes to write these unfounded allegations ?

Snookie
7th September 2013, 19:22
Is't it all getting convenient now...

12 or so years ago there were 6 countries not in the NWO (Bilderberg group) of money.

So far they managed to find excuses for war and start war with these, the fallen ones are:

Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya they are now under NWO control.

Guess which countries are next????

Syria (CIA is involved as per usual to bring the fight home)

Iran (Slowly the excuses with be brought forward to start a war here)

North Korea (Same as the above)

Question is who will be left to start war with? there are no more countries after this.

My guess is WE are, this is why the UK is preparing for Military service as they did just before WW1 (1914) and WWII (1937)

Is it not time to wake up, take your blindfold off as this will effect everyone in the world...

According to Westley Clark you are still missing Lebanon, Sudan and Somalia. The order he gave them in (Iraq, Syria, Lebanon, Libya, Sudan, Somalia and Iran) hasn't quite been followed, but I guess the psychopaths change their mind from time to time. As Obama has recently admitted that Syria is partially about the "free flow of energy".

norman
7th September 2013, 19:49
Oh dear...

I'm not sure how seriously to take this. It could be a half asse's $hit stirring poke by a neo con dinner party or it could be the seed of a clue that they are about to swing this situation right back around after a complete stand down by Obama and then explode a dirty bomb or a chemical bomb in America and say " see, we told you we had to be tough - this is all YOUR fault, all you refuseniks and un american wingeing conspiracy theory trash".

I'm beginning to think they are going to halt the attack because they now believe they can get more mileage out of not doing it than doing it.

sigma6
23rd September 2013, 12:42
Thanks, I followed your link, the source is The Wall Street Journal, don't worry, they will keep on giving information:

"The U.S. has intercepted (an) Iranian message [...] from Qasem Soleimani (listed by the United States as a terrorist) to Iranian-supported Shiite militia groups in Iraq, according to U.S. officials.

In it, Mr. Soleimani said Shiite groups must be prepared to respond with force after a U.S. strike on Syria. Iranian officials didn't respond to requests for comment."

Officials said... and Leon repeated.

By the way, how do you know the CIA didn't pay Julian E. Barnes to write these unfounded allegations ?

Probably the one of the real reasons the US backed off the Syria attack... consistent with their military strategy of only attacking when their opponent is weakened and defenseless.... whatever the public story is (ie. the Kerry BS song and dance) we know it is certainly not the truth...

AutumnW
23rd September 2013, 19:23
Leon, Thank you for drawing attention to this issue; one of the most important of our time. Russia and China are becoming increasingly hostile to the U.S. and that will help balance off the hegemonic power of fascist force. The fascist control system is international, as you point out here, with the U.S at the helm and Britain and commonwealth countries following in lockstep. Both Russia and China are totalitarian regimes, so not much better, but at least they can prevent the U.S. system from running completely amok.

Camilo
23rd September 2013, 19:33
Another chemical attack will most likely occur in another country in order to push forward the controllers' interests in the Middle East. Control of all of the Middle East and Africa will not be forsaken by America's dictators. Africa is their goal—all of Africa, and the oil it contains. (SG)

sdv
23rd September 2013, 20:37
Another chemical attack will most likely occur in another country in order to push forward the controllers' interests in the Middle East. Control of all of the Middle East and Africa will not be forsaken by America's dictators. Africa is their goal—all of Africa, and the oil it contains. (SG)

Perhaps you have not noticed all the terrorist attacks in various developing countries in the past few days? The global agenda to serve the self interests of the elite is many faceted and complex and is played out all over the world. A bit difficult to launch a massive attack on western nations (with all this surveillance someone will smell a rat before it happens and attack on own people may just backfire) so lets slaughter and terrorise those in other countries because all we really care about in our reporting of these events is how may of our own have been killed (and let's forget how many locals have been killed).

It's ok to spy on and kill others, as long as our own are not spied on and killed (the response from the people). And let's use the death of others to push our agenda for control. Everything that happens within our borders and elsewhere serves our agenda for control for self interest because this is a game we have been playing for so long and we know so well.

America and its allies are pushing really hard to turn Africa into another Middle East, and there are many depraved people in Africa who will play along nicely. Any country is vulnerable as collateral damage (the only intelligent thing the SA President has ever said was in his address to the G20 summit in Russia - all small nations feel threatened by America's aggression against Syria ... what excuse will you find to threaten me and my nation?).

Rosieposie
25th September 2013, 12:26
Can't we just stick em all in a room together with a bunch of weapons and let them have at it? Seriously some of us have better things to do than kill one another..