PDA

View Full Version : War on terror, update from the global killing field:



Tesseract
22nd September 2013, 22:07
Just the last ~24 hours:

78 dead in Church bombing in Pakistan
65 dead in Shiite funeral bombing in Iraq
12 dead in Sunni funeral bombing in Iraq
68 dead in Kenya shopping mall attack
3 coalition troops killed by their own ally in Afghanistan

Who would have thought that these terrorists, which to nations were, 20 years ago, about as distracting and as threatening as a fly, would one day present legitimate threats to entire sovereign states (Mali, for example, and Yemen and Syria and Pakistan)? Who would have thought that their numbers would swell into the hundreds of thousands, if not millions? Who would have thought that they would successfully con the western powers into directly providing them arms, money and training, as well as a whole country (Libya) to use as a refuge and staging ground?

Kids who were 10 years old when the USA invaded Iraq are now, for those who survived, 23. How many of them, traumatised, hardened and corrupted by the circumstances forced upon them are now the terrorists of today? In that country terror is now an institution. A bombing that kills 50 people would have been a leading news item, no matter where it occurred, a decade and a half ago. Today such an atrocity in Iraq only warrants a perfunctory minor headline halfway down a news web page.

22960
Monthly deaths in Iraq

How many of the terrorists in Pakistan would be wreaking such havoc if the US had not spent more than a decade defiling Afghanistan and almost as many years firing hellfire missiles at targets in Pakistan? And now the great Satan wants to bomb Syria too, and Iran. In each country a new investment of injustice, inequality and inhumanity. What we are seeing is the whole new generation of terrorists that the peace activists (those traitors who dared to criticize their countries’ own military aims) warned about right at the beginning. From Western leaders, still there is almost no admission of error, no contrition, no guilt, no accountability and no call for accountability (except by those who are not listened to).

There are, unfortunately, those in Western government who prefer that countries in Africa and the Middle East remain largely undeveloped, or even suffer degenerate chaos, if they are not to become policy slaves to those same Western governments. To them the war on terror has been quite productive. There are still a few thorns in the side, like Robert Mugabe, who was again democratically re-elected. He beat his opponent who is still supported by the West, despite being caught on video apparently discussing plans to assassinate Mugabe. The West still plays its demonization game, in bitterness, especially for England, against the president of Zimbabwe, the ‘tyrant’ who, embarrassingly, has domestic popularity ratings far exceeding those of his western counterparts. Watch for a tide of western backed violence when he eventually dies.


22958
We'd like our country back, thank you.


The war on terror is now institutionalised in the US armed forces with the Global War on Terrorism service medal, that little propaganda trinket which was so poignantly hurled away in disgust by dozens of de-programmed ex-military personnel at the anti-NATO rally in Chicago last year. The population in general shakes its head from time to time, when an intense episode grabs the media’s attention, but any hope one gets from this concern is a false hope, for no sooner is there a whisper of discontent than they are re-affirming their support for the ‘war’ by voting for the same parties that lead it. And from our leaders, still, despite the headlines such as those at the top of this post, we are told that we are making the world a safer place. Please don’t let it get any safer.

22959
Getting ready to throw the medals away, NATO is behind the fence deciding to occupy Afghanistan for another quarter-decade.

sdv
23rd September 2013, 00:29
Although I do agree that Western aggression has been a major cause of violence in the world, and that Western arms (because people like Americans block any attempts to stop this trade in arms because it violates their personal rights to own guns, which it does not, but they believe this rubbish and more and more people get killed with the guns they sell to these thugs) and money finances such violence, there are two things I would like to point out for a more balanced view:

We all can choose what we do with our anger and hurt. Personally, I have had enough of the bad choices that people make and how they blame others (they rape and murder and destroy and then blame it on the bad life they had, which is someone else's fault). There are no good or bad sides to violence, just destruction and suffering.

Secondly, if Zimbabweans so love Mugabe why are half of them living in South Africa (these are black Zimbabweans, but most white Zimbabweans have left the country and are now living in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, UK ...)? The election was an embarrassment and a sellout on the part of the SADC, or should I say, the corrupt leaders in the SADC.

Please do not glorify these thugs that are making countries ungovernable, these corrupt dictators, and causing misery and suffering for many.

GlassSteagallfan
23rd September 2013, 00:37
Susan Lindauer, a former CIA asset working in Iraq and author of Extreme Prejudice said that before 9-11, there were approximately 200 hardened terrorist throughout the world, Osama Bin Laden being at the tip of the spear.

In case you update this thread tesseract, how about:

War on Terra, update from the global killing fields:
Terra = Earth

Tesseract
23rd September 2013, 01:36
Although I do agree that Western aggression has been a major cause of violence in the world, and that Western arms (because people like Americans block any attempts to stop this trade in arms because it violates their personal rights to own guns, which it does not, but they believe this rubbish and more and more people get killed with the guns they sell to these thugs) and money finances such violence, there are two things I would like to point out for a more balanced view:

We all can choose what we do with our anger and hurt. Personally, I have had enough of the bad choices that people make and how they blame others (they rape and murder and destroy and then blame it on the bad life they had, which is someone else's fault). There are no good or bad sides to violence, just destruction and suffering.

Secondly, if Zimbabweans so love Mugabe why are half of them living in South Africa (these are black Zimbabweans, but most white Zimbabweans have left the country and are now living in South Africa, Australia, New Zealand, UK ...)? The election was an embarrassment and a sellout on the part of the SADC, or should I say, the corrupt leaders in the SADC.

Please do not glorify these thugs that are making countries ungovernable, these corrupt dictators, and causing misery and suffering for many.

95 % agree with you! But Mugabe is not a dictator, at least, not since the last election. And there's no denying his role in Zimbabwe's independance. But, there is no doubt that ZANU PF under Mugabe is guilty of criminal thuggery. The reasons why people leave and work elsewhere I think is rather complicated, the country is only now starting to recover from the economic crisis. I used to work with a (white) guy from Zimbabwe, still insisted on calling it Rhodesia, he was quite the racist and used the word kaffir a lot when talking about people in his home country.

Atlas
23rd September 2013, 10:34
From Infowars.com:

You’re Much More Likely to Be Killed By Lightning than by a Terrorist (http://www.infowars.com/youre-much-more-likely-to-be-killed-by-lightning-than-by-a-terrorist/)


You are 35,079 (https://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_rn=11&gs_ri=psy-ab&gs_mss=596339%20divided%20by%2017%20&tok=duUe66lgoeLquEDcDRFVGQ&pq=596339%20divided%20by%2017%20&cp=4&gs_id=1ri&xhr=t&q=596,339+divided+by+17&es_nrs=true&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=596,339+divided+by+17+&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=421) times more likely to die from heart disease than from a terrorist attack.
You are 33,842 (https://www.google.com/#hl=en&gs_rn=11&gs_ri=psy-ab&gs_mss=596%2C339%20divided%20by%2017%20&tok=duUe66lgoeLquEDcDRFVGQ&pq=596%2C339%20divided%20by%2017&cp=7&gs_id=1z0&xhr=t&q=575,313+divided+by+17&es_nrs=true&pf=p&sclient=psy-ab&oq=575,313+divided+by+17&gs_l=&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=421) times more likely to die from cancer than from a terrorist attack.
you are 5,882 (https://www.google.com/search?q=100,000+divided+by+17&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&sei=Fdh8UczeI8GCjAKZkoDoAQ&gbv=2) times more likely to die from medical error than terrorism.
you are 4,706 (https://www.google.com/search?q=80%2C000+divided+by+17&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a) times more likely to drink yourself to death than die from terrorism.
you are 2,059 (https://www.google.com/search?q=3,177+divided+by+17&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&sei=mWB9UYb2KYetigKSxoHQCw&gbv=2#client=firefox-a&hl=en&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&gbv=2&biw=933&bih=383&sclient=psy-ab&q=35%2C000+divided+by+17&oq=35%2C000+divided+by+17&gs_l=serp.3...216087.218728.1.219021.15.13.0.0.0.0.400.3319.1j4j2j5j1.13.0...0.0...1c.1.11.psy-ab.giH9_CI9At0&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b) times more likely to kill yourself than die at the hand of a terrorist.
you are 1,904 (https://www.google.com/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=32%2C367+divided+by+17&oq=32%2C367+divided+by+17&gs_l=hp.3...1250.4280.0.4760.15.15.0.0.0.0.184.1780.7j8.15.0...0.0...1c.1.11.psy-ab.jPKlgO7qB3M&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=421) times more likely to die from a car accident than from a terrorist attack.
you are 452 (https://www.google.com/search?q=7,638+deaths+from+HIV+and+45&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a&sei=Z3x9UY-dKOf0iQLL9oGYBA&gbv=2#client=firefox-a&hl=en&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&gbv=2&sclient=psy-ab&q=%287%2C638+plus+45%29+divided+by+17&oq=%287%2C638+plus+45%29+divided+by+17&gs_l=serp.3...3061.23052.0.23582.25.24.1.0.0.0.417.4328.3j14j3j3j1.24.0...0.0...1c.1.11.psy-ab.cdG5Vt5K64I&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=399) times more likely to die from risky sexual behavior than terrorism.
you are 353 (https://www.google.com/search?q=6%2C000+americans+fall+roof+ladders&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a#client=firefox-a&hs=3et&rls=org.mozilla:en-US%3Aofficial&sclient=psy-ab&q=6%2C000+divided+by+17&oq=6%2C000+divided+by+17&gs_l=serp.3..33i29i30l4.204956.206861.0.207772.14.13.0.0.0.0.271.2555.0j6j7.13.0...0.0...1c.1.11.psy-ab.KkA-Eo8gW1I&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=383) times more likely to fall to your death doing something idiotic than die in a terrorist attack.
you are 271 (https://www.google.com/#output=search&sclient=psy-ab&q=4%2C609+divided+by+17&oq=4%2C609+divided+by+17&gs_l=hp.3...688.4044.0.4767.15.15.0.0.0.0.241.1722.7j7j1.15.0...0.0...1c.1.11.psy-ab.2GReJwDoZOA&pbx=1&bav=on.2,or.r_qf.&bvm=bv.45645796,d.cGE&fp=4fb34227f337626b&biw=933&bih=437) times more likely to die from a workplace accident than terrorism.
you are 187 (https://www.google.com/search?q=3,177+divided+by+17&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-asei=mWB9UYb2KYetigKSxoHQCw&gbv=2) times more likely to starve to death than be killed by terrorism.
you are 110 (http://www.cdc.gov/foodborneburden/) times more likely to die from contaminated food than terrorism.
you’re about 22 (https://www.google.com/search?q=%28375+plus+3%29+divided+by+17&ie=utf-8&oe=utf-8&aq=t&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&client=firefox-a) times more likely to die from a brain-eating zombie parasite than a terrorist.
You’re 8 (http://www.policymic.com/articles/37775/you-re-8x-more-likely-to-be-killed-by-a-police-officer-than-a-terrorist) times More Likely to Be Killed by a Police Officer Than a Terrorist.

In the last five years you were 4 (http://danger.mongabay.com/injury_death.htm) times more likely to be struck by lightning than killed by a terrorist.

You are more likely (http://blogs.forward.com/jj-goldberg/176043/more-killed-by-toddlers-than-terrorists-in-us/) to be killed by a toddler than a terrorist:


Number of persons killed on American soil so far this year by terrorists: 3.
Number of persons killed on American soil so far this year by toddlers: 5.

The 2011 Report on Terrorism from the National Counter Terrorism Center notes that Americans are just as likely (http://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2012/06/americans-are-as-likely-to-be-killed-by-their-own-furniture-as-by-terrorism/258156/) to be “crushed to death by their televisions or furniture each year” as they are to be killed by terrorists.

The Senior Research Scientist for the Space Science Institute (Alan W. Harris) estimates that the odds of being killed by a terrorist attack is about the same as being hit by an asteroid (http://politicalscience.osu.edu/faculty/jmueller/HARRIS.PDF).

http://blogs.scientificamerican.com/cross-check/files/2011/09/risk.chart_2.jpg

As the figures above show, terrorism is a very unlikely cause of death.