Is it normal to know what the other person is going to say before they say it?

[Sloppyjoe]

I've been experiencing this all my life. Often times I just know what people are about to say before they say it. Sometimes I feel like I'm interrupting because I will say outloud what the other person is about to say before he/she says it.

[frodo13]

I Have the same thing happen to me all the time. Drives my wife crazy. She says just shut up and let them talk. It takes some time getting used to but some how the thought procees needs to slow down so people don't get mad when talking to them.
Do you ever get the same thing to happen watching sports on TV. where you say what the annoucers are going to say right before hand .My son has now picked up the same trait.
I think it is some form of ESP or psychic abilties. Well good luck.

[Paladin14]

Definitely happens to me all the time. With TV, people talking, songs I've never heard, etc. In some way we must be receiving the data just before we hear it.
Sometimes I get an abrupt signal to move- happens a lot with driving. If I hadn't gotten a kick in the head from my higher self, or higher something, then I believe I could have been in at least 10 serious car accidents that I feel I was able to avoid at the last second.

[Shezbeth]

I suggest it is not normal in the sense that normal is "it happens to everybody", but is normal in the sense that it is more common than you might think, or than many are aware.

There are potential energy dynamics where the recipient receives the information before the conveyer's body can complete the act; Psychological potential where one is able to interpret (either consciously or sub) what a person is saying through body-language, facial/eye cues and other psychological expressions/behaviors.

I'm of the mind that it is all of the above, and not exclusively so.

Masaru Emoto's experiments with water, Paul Ekman's research in facial action codes, plus near endless books, articles, and papers on psychic potential/phenomenon will likely comprehensively provide the details of the mechanics involved.

[sirdipswitch]

many's the time I've looked at my "speedo" to find it waaaay over the limit, steped on the brake "hard"... went round a conner and there sat a cop with RADAR. hmm.. cc.

[DeDukshyn]

For me there are two sides to this .. it happens to me as well, but in close observation I have also noticed that humans are completely predictable. We are all running "reason" and "excuse" programs, and while each human differs in which programs they use regularly (there's quite a few). These programs come complete with unconscious body language, and once you learn them, everyone becomes boring and predictable. Illusionists and special agents can learn these methods ... think something like Criss Angel does. His own handlers say he's a lousy psychic, but a master "reader".

On the other side, is having a subtle sense of higher frequency that make up emotions and (stepped down), thought. Highly sensitive and empathic people can have an ability to even look at at finer frequencies than just being aware of subtle patterns. While both methods are incredible useful, the latter method is more valuable in my opinion, because it always happens far before the ego can get involved, which means deception is more difficult to impose, from others. Being an expert in the former method, it can be used as deception tool as well ....

I do it all the time as well (mostly from the empath side), and often annoy people by fully finishing their sentence after they have only spoken one or two words. It really helps though when people get stumped for the word or phrase they are looking for, and you can just fulfill their intent ;)

My 2 cents.

[Shezbeth]

It really helps though when people get stumped for the word or phrase they are looking for, and you can just fulfill their intent ;)

Likewise, especially when the word is unusually obscure and/or technical beyond my credentials, yet the word just comes to me.

The primary variables in this case seem to be the conveyant and recipient, with emphasis on the conveyant and the degree of awareness they possess/cultivate (cuz in my experience, I'm predominantly the recipient).

The less awareness one fosters, the more simplistic/subconscious/psychological the info-transfer. One who is not aware of themselves will express themselves quite clearly before they open their mouth.

The greater the awareness, the more likely/resolutely one is able to pick up on the information presented. This can manifest in a variety of ways.


went round a conner and there sat a cop with RADAR

This is a classic example, thank you for bringing this up. Police/LEOs are of a particularly palpable intent - I suggest it has to do with the nature of their training and the likelihood that they are sub/unconsciously tapping into their own psychic potential. So fixated are they on their job that I have experienced/participated in 'precognitive perception' of their presence well in advance of one's 'logical' ability to perceive. Though, in those cases I wouldn't rule out an individual's receptivity to the EM radiation from RADAR devices. Still, I can state that there is a different feel between a cop who pulls up behind me and a cop who pulls up behind me with the intent to pull me over.

[chocolate]

It sure happens to me more than the other parties would like it to happen... I even was called recently 'having the problem of talking too much'. it hurts to a degree, but than i am not going to apologize for being who or what i am.
I have noticed ppl get annoyed because we are indeed predictable to a great extend, and finishing their sentences is a bit of a non polite thing to do seen from their side of the situation- 'patience is a virtue'.

[DeDukshyn]

It sure happens to me more than the other parties would like it to happen... I even was called recently 'having the problem of talking too much'. it hurts to a degree, but than i am not going to apologize for being who or what i am.
I have noticed ppl get annoyed because we are indeed predictable to a great extend, and finishing their sentences is a bit of a non polite thing to do seen from their side of the situation- 'patience is a virtue'.

My solution is to construct sentences and stories that no one can predict ;) ... if you are "un - reasonable" (meaning, acting without reliance on "reasons"), you solve this problem - a state all humans will eventually come to as the hypnosis continues to lift.

[ghostrider]

Wait till you start picking up your phone just before it rings and know who it is ... the expanding consciousness moving faster than this timeline ... one can go three days into the future , just let it happen natural , no one will believe it but , it is a reality one must deal with silently ...

[Selene]

Welcome, fellow sufferers! I thought it was only me.

But all my life I’ve been able to understand the rest of someone’s comments from their first few words.

And that gave me the very bad (socially) habit of interrupting them. I’d gotten their message; but they didn’t know that. I was “cutting them off….” [insert P*ss Off Factor here] with my response.

One of my tough lessons over the past few decades has been learning how to quietly ‘listen’ (or pretend to) when I already know everything someone is going to say…..

It’s a work in progress. I need to sit quietly while they work through their own issues, in their own mind. Boring, but.

Glad I’m not alone, though. And you think you’re not very telepathic? Or not receiving on a higher frequency?

http://imageshack.us/a/img46/8902/emotionalexhaustionofli.jpg (http://imageshack.us/photo/my-images/46/emotionalexhaustionofli.jpg/)

Cheers,

Selene

[Shezbeth]

I have found that interjectionally agreeing to their point with a corroborating point before they are able to finish their initial point is sufficient to gratify the person's intent to express, while allowing me the opportunity to initiatively accelerate the exchange.

But we are beginning to broach the area of human psychology that begs the question; Is a given person truly satisfied with being understood, or are they more interested in being heard?

If there were a way by which a speaker could recognize a person's comprehension - a sort of indicator light or something - how many would be content to see the light blink on and how many would be insistent on finishing their sentence?

I suggest that the two poles are correlated as far as to whom this general telepathic/psychological/facial-body-cue/whatever perception occurs and who not.

Consciously, that is.

[Carmen]

Yep, knowing the future is natural, even if it's just a moment in advance. With focus and training that can be advanced still further. Our dumbing down has convinced the majority otherwise but it's there in everyone. In the higher dimensions nothing is secret as all can be seen/sensed. So, when our thoughts are cleaned up, no problem! Otherwise?!