PDA

View Full Version : Looking for PhD research proposals -curing cancer



Peace&Love
21st October 2013, 19:14
Hello,

I think i haven't mentioned it here yet, as a physician, i am contemplating for some time now starting a research on a medication/treatment for cancer under a funded PhD. program.

Considering the notion that some people may communicate with friendly/positive/Service-To-Others beings that wish to help humanity by giving hints or tips what to look for.

If anyone here has such connection and as a positive result of it has some information that could be shared agreeably to all sides involved and that information would be beneficial to Humanity as a free, healthy, happy and long living species, then please PM me.

I do not promise to accept or respond to any message or to any suggestions and would add that all proposals would need to entail details regarding the molecular reaction involved (for example which receptor is activated or blocked etc...).

Best regards,

Peace & Love

ROMANWKT
21st October 2013, 20:33
Hello,

I think i haven't mentioned it here yet, as a physician, i am contemplating for some time now starting a research on a medication/treatment for cancer under a funded PhD. program.

Considering the notion that some people may communicate with friendly/positive/Service-To-Others beings that wish to help humanity by giving hints or tips what to look for.

If anyone here has such connection and as a positive result of it has some information that could be shared agreeably to all sides involved and that information would be beneficial to Humanity as a free, healthy, happy and long living species, then please PM me.

I do not promise to accept or respond to any message or to any suggestions and would add that all proposals would need to entail details regarding the molecular reaction involved (for example which receptor is activated or blocked etc...).

Best regards,

Peace & Love

Hi PL

Could you explain who is actualy funding this possible course of action by you???

Regards

roman

ROMANWKT
21st October 2013, 21:06
23332


Here is a cure for cancer, 8 molecules, sugar proteins, glyco nutrients, with millions of combinations, switching on that should be on, and switching of that should be off, otherwise immune disorder.

Coating of these 8 molecules on cells establishes cellular communication with ones blueprint, DNA.

If you persist in your investigation of this cure for cancer, your career is over.

Warmest regards

roman

jagman
21st October 2013, 21:27
The apricott seed.

Carmen
21st October 2013, 21:41
Black salve, the candida/fungal connection to cancer and parasitic infestation. I have no medical knowledge but have used black salve on my own skin cancer and others successfully. And no, I did not get a biopsy as I did not want to get caught up in the "system". In my opinion cancer will not be cured by the medical profession as they have no desire for a cure it will cured by a groundswell of ordinary people looking and finding answers for themselves and completely bypassing the medical profession.

Tesla_WTC_Solution
21st October 2013, 22:44
Cannabidiol (CBD) is one of at least 85 cannabinoids found in cannabis.[2] It is a major constituent of the plant, second to THC, and represents up to 40% in its extracts.[3] Compared with THC, cannabidiol is less psychoactive, and is considered to have a wider scope of medical applications than THC,[4] including to epilepsy,[5] multiple sclerosis spasms,[6] anxiety disorders, Bipolar Disorder,[4] schizophrenia,[7] nausea, convulsion and inflammation, as well as inhibiting cancer cell growth.[8] CBD may decrease the rate of THC clearance from the body, perhaps by interfering with the metabolism of THC in the liver. Cannabidiol has displayed sedative effects in animal tests.[9] Other research indicates that CBD increases alertness.[10] CBD has been shown to reduce growth of aggressive human breast cancer cells in vitro, and to reduce their invasiveness.[11]


references:


1. ^ McPartland, JM; Russo, EB (2001). "Cannabis and Cannabis Extracts: Greater Than the Sum of Their Parts?". Journal of Cannabis Therapeutics 1 (3/4): 103–132. doi:10.1300/J175v01n03_08.
Jump up ^ El-Alfy, Abir T, et al. (Jun 2010). "Antidepressant-like effect of delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and other cannabinoids isolated from Cannabis sativa L.". Pharmacology Biochemistry and Behavior 95 (4): 434–42. doi:10.1016/j.pbb.2010.03.004. PMC 2866040. PMID 20332000.
Jump up ^ Grlić, Ljubiša (1962). "A comparative study on some chemical and biological characteristics of various samples of cannabis resin". Bulletin on Narcotics (UNODC) (3): 37–46.
^ Jump up to: a b Ashton, C.H., Moore, P. B., Gallagher, P., Young, A. H. (2005). Cannabinoids in bipolar affective disorder: a review and discussion of their therapeutic potential. Journal of Psychopharmacology (U.K).
Jump up ^ Jones, N. A.; Glyn, S. E.; Akiyama, S.; Hill, T. D. M.; Hill, A. J.; Weston, S. E.; Burnett, M. D. A.; Yamasaki, Y.; Stephens, G. J.; Whalley, B. J.; Williams, C. M. (2012). "Cannabidiol exerts anti-convulsant effects in animal models of temporal lobe and partial seizures". Seizure 21 (5): 344–352. doi:10.1016/j.seizure.2012.03.001. PMID 22520455.
Jump up ^ Kozela, E.; Lev, N.; Kaushansky, N.; Eilam, R.; Rimmerman, N.; Levy, R.; Ben-Nun, A.; Juknat, A.; Vogel, Z. (2011). "Cannabidiol inhibits pathogenic T cells, decreases spinal microglial activation and ameliorates multiple sclerosis-like disease in C57BL/6 mice". British Journal of Pharmacology 163 (7): 1507–1519. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.2011.01379.x. PMC 3165959. PMID 21449980.
^ Jump up to: a b c Zuardi, A.W; J.A.S. Crippa, J.E.C. Hallak, F.A. Moreira, F.S. Guimarăes (2006). "Cannabidiol, a Cannabis sativa constituent, as an antipsychotic drug" (PDF). Braz. J. Med. Biol. Res. 39 (4): 421–429. doi:10.1590/S0100-879X2006000400001. PMID 16612464.
^ Jump up to: a b c d Mechoulam, R.; M. Peters, Murillo-Rodriguez (21 Aug 2007). "Cannabidiol - recent advances". Chemistry & Biodiversity 4 (8): 1678–1692. doi:10.1002/cbdv.200790147. PMID 17712814.
Jump up ^ Pickens JT (1981). "Sedative activity of cannabis in relation to its delta'-trans-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol content". Br. J. Pharmacol. 72 (4): 649–56. doi:10.1111/j.1476-5381.1981.tb09145.x. PMC 2071638. PMID 6269680.
Jump up ^ Nicholson, AN; C Turner, BM Stone, and PJ Robson (June 2004). "Effect of Delta-9-tetrahydrocannabinol and cannabidiol on nocturnal sleep and early-morning behavior in young adults". J Clin Psychopharmacol 24 (3): 305–13. doi:10.1097/01.jcp.0000125688.05091.8f. ISSN 0271-0749. PMID 15118485.
^ Jump up to: a b c McAllister SD, Christian RT, Horowitz MP, Garcia A, Desprez PY (2007). "Cannabidiol as a novel inhibitor of Id-1 gene expression in aggressive breast cancer cells". Mol. Cancer Ther. 6 (11): 2921–7. doi:10.1158/1535-7163.MCT-07-0371. PMID 18025276.

sigma6
21st October 2013, 23:55
Black salve, the candida/fungal connection to cancer and parasitic infestation. I have no medical knowledge but have used black salve on my own skin cancer and others successfully. And no, I did not get a biopsy as I did not want to get caught up in the "system". In my opinion cancer will not be cured by the medical profession as they have no desire for a cure it will cured by a groundswell of ordinary people looking and finding answers for themselves and completely bypassing the medical profession.

Amen to that the field of Science and the Administrations of Universties around the world especially in the West is like the Police Stations, Fire Depts, Governments, Hospitals infested and now supersaturated with parasitical freemason, secret societies (have you ever wondered why mediocrity is the RULE and not the exception, when everyone gets their job based on a secret (and highly illegal) handshake?)

Dude there are so many cures for cancer today it's absolutely RETARDED!!!

Beside cannabis, which everyone on the planet knows about now (except of course the medical establishment, government, and big pharma.... (duhhh....) LOL
...anyhow my current pet topic is turpinols, the antifungal sap from pine trees. Nature is abundant in cures for everything that ail man. We live in the age of the parasite...

Carmen
22nd October 2013, 00:07
Sorry Peace & Love, I realise my response is not what you are looking for but one gets rather pissed off and cynical with the medical profession while cancer rages in more and more and ever younger victims. I spoke to a local person the other day. Her daughter-in-law had just died of brain cancer.! She'd had a large melanoma cut from her back seven years ago! Also the sad case of a little Christchurch boy with terminal cancer. The parents had moved heaven and earth to save their son, meanwhile the father finds a melanoma on his back and is dead in six weeks!

It's rather ironic that when people die of cancer through conventional medicine the attitude is "How sad, he/she died". When someone dies of cancer when they have pursued an alternative cure, all hell breaks loose!! Media and the authorities hone in on the case and the alternative method is often banned or destroyed. It would be interesting to knows the statistics of how many survive conventional cancer treatment.

Okay, that's me, I've had my say! I won't disrupt this thread again.

chancy
22nd October 2013, 04:36
Hello Peace&Love:
It's great to have you in the forum! There is an enormous amount of information in regards to cancer here at Avalon.
One of my relatives is a genius and he to is a doctor. 2 of his kids came down with cancer and he could not save one with conventional medicine. The other one is deathy ill as we speak. I sent him a few informational videos to watch. From what I see he did not even take a look! I admire a Dr. such as yourself that hopefully has an open mind.
Here are a couple of documentaries that are already in the forum but I will post them again for a informations sake.

1. The Beautiful Truth - Full Version

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cMOKTlBlDk


2. RUN FROM THE CURE movie- Rick Simpson Phoenix Tears THC HEMP OIL

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JsuradmaMO0

3. LEAF [Juicing Raw Cannabis]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=S-iU9QN0fEM

Well Peace&Love this hopefully will give you a great start to understanding cures that are not snake oil. Good luck with your research

chancy

Peace&Love
22nd October 2013, 08:17
Thanks for everyone for their responses.
Indeed many medications origin from the traditional old time herbal remedies our ancestors used and also from researching how the interrelation between microorganisms can provide us understanding of the mechanism of inhibition of the foreign pathological invader, for example Penicillin.
Also true that the pharmaceutical industry is a Multi-Billion dollar business run by very few big corporations.
It takes 20 year to protect a patent within that time frame, if there is a considerable evidence to show it is worth investing in clinical trials then the process might take 12 years until a medication gets a label approval for marketing and to be given to patients, it means only 8 years are left before competitors companies can copy the molecular structures and produce a cheaper medication, that is why Pharma companies are not in a hurry to find a ways for us not to pay them back for all their investment and indeed simpler natural methods are being withheld from general public knowledge and being looked upon in the same manner people who talk about aliens are looked upon. I believe a disclosure in that area will also come not long after the alien disclosure.
Regarding the first question: I don't know who will fund the research as i have not applied yet. But i guess a University institution would might look into it if has plausible root to even consider presenting a proposal.

Regarding the CBD/ THC, it is well researched and i believe it is getting very advanced so much more good news will come in that area in the future.

I am looking for a molecular mechanism that has not been explored yet or an approach to cure on a chemical/ genetic level that is not known yet and that some friendly entity for the reasons mentioned in my first post would be happy to share with Humanity.
Some people claim they have Free energy solutions as a result of communication with aliens, i am just giving an idea that humanity might also benefit if we are to receive Health promoting solutions.

Thanks again you all for the wonderful posts and thoughts sharing.

Peace & Love

Sunny-side-up
22nd October 2013, 11:06
Hello Peace&Love, good luck!

Be the one!

Crack that case open and be the provider to all!

Like so many whistleblowers who become Martyrs!

Slay that Monster, you can do it!

If I'm not mistaken you are hoping that some other worldly being/s, entities are members here? or listen in Yes?

You are calling out for greater knowledge than we have at present from without,
I personally agree to give out such a request for help on this subject and at the level you are looking at;
it would allow the help from others as it is a direct request!

Good Luck to you!

Love, Hugs and Glowing Healing Energies to all.

Peace&Love
22nd October 2013, 15:56
Hello Peace&Love, good luck!

Be the one!

Crack that case open and be the provider to all!

Like so many whistleblowers who become Martyrs!

Slay that Monster, you can do it!

If I'm not mistaken you are hoping that some other worldly being/s, entities are members here? or listen in Yes?

You are calling out for greater knowledge than we have at present from without,
I personally agree to give out such a request for help on this subject and at the level you are looking at;
it would allow the help from others as it is a direct request!

Good Luck to you!

Love, Hugs and Glowing Healing Energies to all.

Thank you Sunny-side-up for the kind words! :) I would like to add i am not a hero, martyr, whistle-blower, warrior or in any fight mode of slaying monsters :) This is a good will initiative, not a request, not a demand. Only an idea to be agreed upon.
I am not the point of interest here, i do not need fame or glory and for all i care, this information if exist and /or given to someone can skip me in the process. My focus is more on the part of raising awareness to ideas and ways towards the betterment of the health of the human race in the most positive way, with Peace, Love and Joy.

Best wishes,

Peace & Love

sheme
22nd October 2013, 18:01
http://thetopicofcancer.co.uk/book-reviews

I have met this woman - a real power house, generous with her time and love, I have her email if you are interested.

Peace&Love
22nd October 2013, 18:56
http://thetopicofcancer.co.uk/book-reviews

I have met this woman - a real power house, generous with her time and love, I have her email if you are interested.

Thanks Sheme. Indeed her story is very inspirational and thought provoking. I couldn't find any information regarding biochemical mechanisms she is aware of. I need specific scientific details for having a research. Taking high doses vit C. as a strong anti-oxidant is a subject being currently researched by many good other scientists.
I will happily receive the email address, but i wish to further wait before contacting her as this lead is known to humanity for some time now.

Many thanks Sheme!

Peace & Love

sheme
22nd October 2013, 19:46
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9cMOKTlBlDk

More food for thought here.

Fairy Friend
23rd October 2013, 09:36
I believe the cause of cancer is systemic damage done to the DNA beyond one's ability to repair the damage leading to uncontrolled cell growth. That is cancer. Toxins, viruses and radiation all cause cancer by this exact same method. Which means if this is true then the cure to cancer is all about DNA repair. Once mistakes in the DNA are made more mistakes can start to compound it. Leading to worse and worse cancers. Therefore the cure to cancer is all about DNA repair. There are several diseases without proper DNA repair Fanconis anemia, ataxia telangiectasia, xeroderma pigmentosa, Bloom syndrome are all conditions where a DNA repair gene is defective. They are prone to cancer. Viruses can cause cancer but only the ones that integrate into the DNA like feline leukemia virus or AIDS. Radiation and toxins cause cancer by the same exact mechanism damaging the DNA where there is so much damage to DNA, it cannot repair it all, cancer can form. fortunately there is redundancy in the system and we are made with multiple copies of DNA repair genes. Even the breast cancer genes they talk about are DNA repair genes which they don't talk about. There are others genes that can be affected leading to cell growth. These genes are turned on in the developmental stage once development has occurred they are now turned off and remain off. If they are accidentally turned on they can lead to rapid cell growth which is cancer. The best strategy is to have no damage done to the DNA at all so that no repairs are necessary but preventative medicine is a tricky thing it requires the world to change and it resist change. Fairy Friend

foreverfan
24th October 2013, 01:09
From www.CancerTutor.com


Safe, Gentle and Highly Effective Cancer Treatments Already Exist!!

Did you know that "cure rates" for the same kind of cancer can range from 3% to 90%? Safe and gentle cancer treatments (with 90% cure rates) have existed for decades!! But the general public does not know about these cancer treatments because the media doesn't talk about them.

The general public also doesn't know that there are more than 20 cancer treatments which can revert cancer cells into normal cells!! Reverting cancer cells into normal cells was first done in the 1930s, long before the discovery of DNA in 1953.

Why doesn't the media talk about the safe and gentle cancer treatments with 90% cure rates and the safe and gentle cancer treatments that revert cancer cells into normal cells??

The reason is that the media is owned by multi-billionaires and the treatments that have 90% cure rates are not profitable enough to satisfy their lust for profits. People who trust the media have a 3% chance of surviving their cancer for 5 years!!


What Causes Cancer?


Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc. by R. Webster Kehr

Introduction

You cannot believe how many emails I have gotten from cancer patients who have gone through these three steps:
1) The patient had surgery to "cut out" the cancer,
2) The patient was told they were "cancer free,"
3) Months later the cancer "came back," which is called "regression."

Among other things, this article will explain what went wrong and will explain how to prevent the cancer from coming back.

When talking about what causes cancer we need to talk about it at two different levels.

The first level is talking about cancer at the systemic level, meaning what conditions in the body allowed the cancer to grow out of control and how do we deal with this issue.

The second level of talking about cancer is talking about what causes cancer at the cellular level. In other words, why does an individual normal cell become cancerous and how do we revert cancer cells into normal cells?

These two subjects are totally different subjects!!

We can compare these two levels by talking about a flood. We could talk all day long about the damage a rain storm caused, such as the flooding of rivers, the damage to crops caused by heavy rain, the damage to roads that have flooded, etc. But that is only one level to talk about rain. We could also ask what weather conditions cause rain to form in the clouds.

Thus, a scientist might talk about what causes rain up in the clouds, but a newscaster might talk about the damage caused by the flooding of a river caused by the rain.

The same is true about cancer. A cancer practitioner might research how to kill cancer cells or revert them into normal cells, but a cancer researcher might ask why the immune system was weak and why individual cells were cancerous.

A discussion about what causes cancer at the cellular level is a totally different subject than talking about what causes cancer at the systemic level.

So let us start by talking about cancer at the systemic level.

What Causes Cancer - Systemic Level

Everyone has cancer cells in their body, so why does one person never get diagnosed with cancer and another person is diagnosed with cancer?

Cancer is almost always caused by the same multi-step sequence of events.

First, nasty microbes and parasites get inside of the organs and make their homes there. These microbes generally come from meat that was not adequately cooked, but they can come from other sources.

Second, these microbes intercept glucose which was headed for the cells in the organs.

Third, these microbes excrete (as waste products) mycotoxins, which are highly acid and totally worthless to the cells.

Fourth, because the cells (in the organs) don't get the food they need (because it has been intercepted), and because they are living in a sea of filth (i.e. mycotoxins), the cells in the organ become weak.

Fifth, organs are made exclusively of cells. In other words, if you took all of the cells out of an organ, there would be no organ. Thus, because the cells in the organ(s) are weak, the organ(s) are weak.

Sixth, because one or more major organs are weak the immune system becomes weak. Actually, the microbes weaken the immune system both directly and indirectly.

Seventh, because the immune system is weak it cannot kill enough cancer cells and the cancer cells grow out of control.

Thus, in summary, the "root cause" of cancer is microbes and parasites that are in the organs or colon (or bloodstream), which weakens the immune system!!

However, other things can cause cancer. For example, a vaccination can weaken the immune system due to mercury and/or toxins. Filth in the colon can also lead to a weak immune system (see the book: "Fire in the Belly" by Dr. Keith Scott-Mumby, MD.): Fire In The Belly Book

The reader might have noted the "or bloodstream" note above. Cancer patients who have microbes in the organs also have microbes in the bloodstream. Which caused the other will vary by cancer patient. But microbes which originate in the organs will spread the microbes to the bloodstream, and vice versa. Exactly how much the microbes in the organs weaken the immune system, versus how much the microbes in the bloodstream weaken the immune system varies by case, but parasites would likely be found in the organs.

When thinking about the above steps, there are three major ways to cure cancer:
1) Safely target and kill the cancer cells,
2) Kill the microbes inside the cancer cells (which will be discussed below) and the cancer cells will revert into normal cells,
3) Kill the microbes that are causing the immune system to be weak (and this includes the microbes in the organs and the microbes in the bloodstream).

Actually, without doing #3, the cancer could come back again.

The reader might wonder if there are any natural cancer treatments that are specifically designed to identify and get rid of the microbes in the organs? The answer is 'yes'. The Photon Protocol, designed by the Ed Skilling Institute, is designed to identify which microbes are involved and which organs are involved in each individual case.

The staff at the Ed Skilling Institute then designs a custom nutritional protocol (for each patient) to target and kill these microbes so the immune system can get back to normal. Then the immune system can deal with the cancer. They also combine an electromedicine protocol (a Photon device) which also kills large numbers of microbes, pumps the lymph system, energizes weak cells to keep the patient alive or to keep them from getting weak, creates nitric oxide, etc. etc.

On this website the Ed Skilling protocol is called the "Photon Protocol" (see the left side-bar). The Photon Protocol consists of one or two Photon devices and a custom nutritional protocol. The Photon Genius costs $25,000 and the Photon Genie costs $3,000. This cost includes the consultation. These two devices do largely the same things, but the Photon Genius is far more powerful and does additional things especially for weak cancer patients.

However, there are other ways to get rid of the microbes and parasites in the organs, even without knowing what they are.

For example, the GB-4000 M.O.P.A. (frequently called: "High RF Frequency Protocol - Plasma" on this website) or GB-4000 SR-4 (frequently called: "High RF Frequency Protocol - 10 Watt") will also kill these microbes and parasites without knowing what they are. This is because this device, if you follow the ICRF instructions, which are free, will cover enough frequencies to kill all of these micobes and parasites.

Another option is "liver flushes," such as designed by Hulda Clark or Ty Bollinger (in his book: The 31-Day Home Cancer Cure).

So in short, there are treatments for all budgets.


Fixing the "Root Cause" of Cancer

While many natural cancer treatments do very well against cancer, what is missing in many natural cancer treatment protocols is getting rid of the microbes in the organs, which is the "root cause" of most cases of cancer.

In many cases the immune system can get rid of these microbes, but in fact some types of tapeworms, flukes and fungus, etc. cannot be killed by the immune system for one reason or another (e.g. the microbes are not accessible by the immune system).

Liver flushes and special nutrients may be required to deal with these microbes and parasites. But the fact is that many natural cancer treatments do very well without dealing with these special microbes. But the patient should be aware of these issues.

By getting rid of the microbes in the organs, plus doing the normal cancer treatments, the balance (i.e. a strong immune system and a low number of cancer cells) is restrored enough to keep the cancer from coming back. The patient is cured because their immune system has been fixed and the number of cancer cells (by using special protocols) has been reduced!! The cancer will not come back as long as the patient watches their diet.

The approach of orthodox medicine, however, is to severely damage the immune system with chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. This makes the imbalance even worse because these things damage the immune system and do a very poor job of targeting the cancer cells and do an even worse job of killing the microbes in the organs.

Orthodox cancer treatments also kill many healthy cells and can damage organs, the lymph system, etc. Is it any wonder the cancer always seems to "come back" after surgery or chemotherapy? This is called "regression."

For example, how does cutting off a breast going to fix the immune system? Don't be absurd. I don't know how many times I have told cancer patients that "you cannot cut cancer out."

Is it any wonder that alternative cancer treatments, when administered by experts, have a massively higher cure rate than orthodox medicine? Most natural cancer treatments include immune builders and things that kill cancer cells. Some protocols also include things to clean the blood of microbes, which will also supercharge the immune system.

Ponder this carefully: even when orthodox medicine puts someone into "remission" (i.e. their cancer appears to be gone), they have not fixed the "root cause" of the cancer, so it is almost certain the cancer will come back!! That is why the true "five-year" cure rate of orthodox medicine is less than 3%.

Because the "root cause" of cancer is a weak immune system, YOU CANNOT CUT CANCER OUT, you have to deal with the "root cause" of the cancer!!!

Even in Natural Medicine the Cancer Can Come Back

Many natural cancer treatments, whether cancer treatments that kill the cancer cells or even revert the cancer cells into normal cells, can have significant regression rates!!

One reason was discussed above, the microbes in the organs and/or bloodstream were not identified and destroyed.

In other words, even natural cancer treatments that kill cancer cells or revert cancer cells into normal cells can have the cancer return!! If natural cancer treatments don't fix the "root cause" of the cancer, by cleaning the blood, and especially the organs of microbes and parasites, the cancer can come back.

What Causes Cancer - Cellular Level - Part 1

So far we have only talked about what causes cancer at the systemic level. So what causes an individual cell to become cancerous? Many cancer cells form by a prior cancer cell dividing and creating two cancer cells. But how does a normal cell, which is not cancerous, become cancerous?

In a normal cell, molecules called ATP (adenosine triphosphate) provide the energy of the cell. ATP molecules are created inside the mitochondria which are inside of every human cell. In fact, there are thousands of mitochondria inside of every human cell.

The very definition of a cancer cells is low ATP energy!!

The normal process of creating ATP molecules is this (this is highly simplified):
1) Glucose gets inside of the cell from the bloodstream,
2) Some of the glucose is converted into pyruvate [this is about a 10 step process],
3) Pyruvate gets inside of the mitochondria,
4) Once inside the mitochondria, pyruvate is at the beginning of two sequential chemical reactions (the Citric Acid Cycle or Krebs Cycle and then the Electron Transport Chain which spins-off about half-way through the Citric Acid Cycle). It is these two cycles which create most of the ATP molecules in the cell.

Cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose than a normal cell. Thus, a person would logically expect a cancer cell to create 15 times more ATP molecules than a normal cell.

But in reality, cancer cells create virtually zero ATP molecules!! Cancer cells are ATP molecule starved and they have to revert to fermentation to create what little ATP molecules they create.

With so much glucose there should be an abundance of ATP molecules!! Why do cancer cells consume 15 times more glucose and yet not be able to create a significant amount of ATP molecules?

The thing that blocks the production of ATP molecules is a very special pleomorphic bacteria that is inside the cancer cells!!.

The Independent Cancer Research Foundation, and others, believe the microbe is Helicobacter Pylori or H. pylori. In some cases Fusobacterium may be involved as well as it is also known to get inside of cells.

While everyone has H. pylori bacteria in their body (generally in their digestive tract), how does H. pylori get inside of a healthy cell? Generally it doesn't. But in some cases an acidic diet can make this bacteria highly aggressive and it can literally drill itself inside of a normal cell to get away from the acidity in the blood, as discovered by Robert O. Young, PhD.

Another way microbes can get inside of cells is because asbestos or the chemicals in tobacco cut the cell membrane. This can allow microbes inside the cells. But remember that even though all of us have cancer cells, don't forget we also have an immune system.

So how does a bacteria block the production of ATP molecules and thus turn a cell cancerous after it has gotten inside the cell?

In 2004, the Independent Cancer Research Foundation developed the model which still stands today.

The bacteria blocks ATP production in two different ways:

First, bacteria eat glucose so as the bacteria proliferate inside the cell (by the way, a bacteria is roughly the same size as a mitochondria) they intercept more and more glucose. This means less and less pyruvate is made because there is less glucose to be converted into pyruvate. This means less ATP is made!!

Second, microbes excrete mycotoxins, which are highly acidic and totally worthless molecules.

As one ICRF (i.e. the Independent Cancer Research Foundation, Inc.) researcher put it: the mitochondria, instead of "swimming" in a sea of pyruvate are swimming in a sea of mycotoxins!!

Both items contribute to the mitochondria not obtaining enough pyruvate and this hinders both the Citric Acid Cycle and the Electron Transport Chain and thus blocks the production of an adequate amount of ATP in the mitochondria.

This microbe is highly pleomorphic, meaning it has many different sizes and shapes. This microbe can literally be smaller than a virus. Many people think it is a virus or fungus that causes cancer, but it is actually a cell wall deficient highly pleomorphic bacteria.

The book: The Persecution and Trial of Gaston Naessens describes the 16 phases of the cancer microbe. See this article for their names:
Advanced Cancer Theory Article

In one of its smaller states it is the size of a virus and can enter inside of the cell nucleus. Like a virus, which gets inside of the nucleus, the DNA of the cancer microbe can interact with the DNA inside the cell nucleus and change the DNA structure of the cell.

More importantly, the Dillers [who were part of the Dr. Virginia Livingston team] showed that cancer germs [i.e. microbes] were able to gain entrance not only into the [non-cancerous] cell (intra-cellular), but also into the nucleus of the cell. This intra-nuclear invasion meant that cancer microbes could gain access to the genes contained within the nucleus itself.
Four Women Against Cancer, by Dr. Alan Cantwell, M.D, Page 47

Scientists see the DNA damage caused by these microbes and claim that it is DNA damage which causes cancer. This is like saying that smoke is the cause of fires. It is a good guess, but it is false. The DNA damage of a cancer cell is caused by the DNA of the same highly pleomorphic bacteria that blocked the production of ATP molecules. Actually, this bacteria does many other things to create cancer cells, protect cancer cells from the immune system and spread cancer!! In fact, the characteristics of this bacteria are mind-numbing.

Thus, the claim by cancer researchers (who are funded by the pharmaceutical industry) that DNA damage causes cancer is wrong. Whether this is an intentional error (i.e. to avoid finding a cure for cancer) or is caused by ignorance I do not know.

In any case, due to the lack of energy in cancer cells (i.e. due to the lack of ATP molecules), cancer cells are very weak. But because cancer cells steal glucose from the body the non-cancerous cells have less glucose and are very sick!! They are sick for other reasons as well (e.g. cachexia cycle as cancer cells excrete lactic acid).

Many cancer researchers, starting over 100 years ago in the 1890s, have isolated the cause of cancer to be microbes (at the cellular level), though they did not understand the mechanism inside the cell which caused a microbe to make a cell cancerous.

In 1890 the distinguished pathologist William Russell (1852-1940) first reported "cancer parasites" in cancer tissue that was specially stained with carbol fuchsin, a red dye. The "parasite" was found inside and outside the cells. The smallest forms were barely visible microscopically; and the largest parasites were as large as red blood cells. Russell also found "parasites" in tuberculosis, syphilis and skin ulcers.
Four Women Against Cancer, by Dr. Alan Cantwell, M.D, pages 53-54

Dr. Russell, in 1890, knew that the cancer microbes was pleomorphic!!

Note that the cancer microbe was found both inside and outside of the cancer cells. One method that cancer cells use to spread quickly (at least for some kinds of cancer) is for the cancer microbe to come out of the cell, travel through the blood and create a new "colony" of cancer cells far from the original colony. Squamous Cell Carcinoma, melanomas, sarcomas and uterine cancer have all been identified by ICRF researchers as spreading in this way!!

This is just the beginning.

The cancer microbe also excretes enzymes that coat the outside of the cancer cells. This coating of enzymes blocks the immune system from identifying the cancer cells as being cancer cells!!

It was also discovered, around the 1950s, that natural pancreatic enzymes, made in the pancreas, could dissolve this protein coating so the immune system could identify and thus kill the cancer cells.

This discovery in turn led to the advice that natural cancer treatments should prohibit the cancer patient from eating meats or other foods that the pancreatic enzymes cut apart. In other words, these foods "use up" the pancreatic enzymes while in the stomach so less of them are available to expose cancer cells to the immune system.

When a cancer patient is using pancreatic enzymes in their protocol, they should not eat meat or dairy products. In fact, no cancer patient should eat very much meat and they should not eat or drink any dairy products (for multiple reasons) or sugar.

The trade-off is that meat can help a weak cancer patient who is not on a pancreatic enzyme protocol.

It gets worse. Dr. Matthias Rath discovered that these microbes excrete enzymes that "cut a path" along tissue so the cancer can spread more easily along tissue!!

In summary, cancer at the systemic level is caused by an imbalance between the strength of the immune system and the number of cancer cells. At the systemic level many, many things can cause cancer, especially things that weaken the immune system. The weak immune system is almost always caused by microbes and parasites which are inside the organs, but are not necessarily inside the cancer cells.

But cancer at the cellular level is caused by very unique and common microbes which are inside of the cancer cells. These microbes do many amazing things to help cancer cells do their damage and protect themselves!!

It gets worse.

Cancer cells create and excrete large amounts of lactic acid, as already mentioned, as they process large amounts of glucose inefficiently. This lactic acid goes into the bloodstream and gets to the liver. The liver converts the lactic acid to glucose. This "ping pong ball" cycle, where the cancer cells convert glucose into lactic acid and the liver converts lactic acid into glucose, is called the "lactic acid cycle" or "cachexia cycle."

This cycle is what kills about half of all cancer patients because so much energy is consumed at both ends of the cycle. The patient becomes very weak and simply dies.

The lactic acid also blocks many key nutrients from getting to the cancer cells!!

Dealing with the lactic-acid cycle is frequently a major effort of a cancer treatment. It may involve using hydrazine sulphate, Methyl-Sulphonal-Methane (which helps flush the lactic acid out), D-Ribose (to get energy to the non-cancerous cells), Vitamin C (ditto), etc. etc.

What Causes Cancer - Cellular Level - Part 2

In What Causes Cancer - Cellular Level - Part 1 we talked about how microbes can lower ATP energy, which is the very definition of a cancer cell.

Are there other things that can lower ATP energy? Actually there are. This section will talk about two other things that can cause a cell to be cancerous.

The first thing is certain chemicals or asbestos. How can chemicals cause cancer? If these chemicals or asbestos get inside the cell, they can damage or destroy many of the mitochondria. And there may be other ways they can damage the production of ATP, such as chemically interfering with the chemical chain reactions that are leading to ATP (either outside or inside the mitochondria).

Let's talk about the second cause. The second cause is DNA damage. This is NOT as common as you might think. Orthodox medicine claims that ALL cancer is caused by DNA damage. This is nonsense.

However, I will agree that SOME cancers are caused by DNA damage. Many of the ICRF cancer treatments would not work on cancers caused by genetic damage.

For example, take the BRCA2 gene. Let us suppose that in a cell the BRCA2 gene is damaged by chemicals, GMO foods, or any number of other causes.

As the cell with this DNA damage divides, all of the "daughter" cells" will have this genetic damage.

So how does a bad gene create a cancer cell? In a cell, genes are the patterns used to make enzymes or proteins. If a gene is damaged then the enzymes or proteins made by this gene will be defective.

Everything that goes on in a cell is controlled by proteins. There are worker proteins, supervisor proteins, etc. If these are damaged then one or more of the large number of chemical chain reactions inside the cell may fail. This may mean the creation of ATP is damaged.

If a significant amount of ATP energy production is blocked inside the cell, then by definition the cell is cancerous.

So exactly how do the BRCA1 or BRCA2 defective genes cause cancer? We don't know where or why their defective enzymes block the production of ATP energy and we don't know by how much they block the ATP production.

They cannot block the ATP production completely or the cell would fall apart. So we do know it is a partial interference.

This is a research topic for the Independent Cancer Research Foundation (ICRF), but we have no money and no staff to do the research. So for now we will have to say: "we don't have a clue."

Rest of the Article (http://www.cancertutor.com/Articles/What_Causes_Cancer.html)

Cognitive Dissident
24th October 2013, 01:24
http://thetopicofcancer.co.uk/book-reviews

I have met this woman - a real power house, generous with her time and love, I have her email if you are interested.

Thanks Sheme. Indeed her story is very inspirational and thought provoking. I couldn't find any information regarding biochemical mechanisms she is aware of. I need specific scientific details for having a research. Taking high doses vit C. as a strong anti-oxidant is a subject being currently researched by many good other scientists.
I will happily receive the email address, but i wish to further wait before contacting her as this lead is known to humanity for some time now.

Many thanks Sheme!

Peace & Love

Peace & Love - it's great that you are working on this area. But I am not sure if you really appreciate the central paradox:

There are already many cures, all of which are suppressed and/or ignored. Further advanced research is not really required to find a cure for cancer.

Many of these have already been mentioned, for example on www.CancerTutor.com - also Rick Simpson Hemp Oil.

You should also look at the work of the Marinus Clinic in Germany, which helped Lloyd Pye recently when he was diagnosed with cancer.

What Big Pharma is trying to do, is find a "cure" (or treatment) for cancer that can be patented, and hence is profitable.

So, they have absolutely no interest in Rick Simpson Oil (which is shown to work) but plenty of interest in THC (which can be extracted, made into a medicine and patented). Such hypocrites!

I appreciate this may not be exactly the answer you were looking for. But it has to be the starting perspective for working in this area.

Edit: to add something positive to respond to your original question!

Dr Beard, from Scotland, around 1900 (!) realised that the placenta grew quickly, like a cancer, in the early stages of pregnancy, then stopped - because of enzymes from the pancreas. He then used those enzymes to cure cancer - successfully - but eventually had problems due to the difficulty of sourcing the enzymes. More recently his work has been taken up again - links below. I have not looked into all these links but it does look very interesting. Dr Gonzalez goes into great detail on his attempts to set up clinical trials, etc. Also, this treatment was featured on Fox News! Interesting.

http://www.dr-gonzalez.com/history_of_treatment.htm

http://www.cancerfightingstrategies.com/enzymes-for-cancer.html#sthash.ObLOtoib.dpbs

http://foxnewsinsider.com/2013/09/21/carol-alt-and-nicholas-gonzalez-discuss-alternative-cancer-therapy-through-pancreatic

Peace&Love
24th October 2013, 05:06
Thank you :) I will look up the information and links.
I guess the kind of information i was thinking of would not arrive in a miraculous way through the forum. That's great news! It means we humans are the only ones in charge and the only one to change and affect the reality we live in, no one else interferes for good or bad. I find the pancreatic enzyme an interesting topic, i will dig into it further.
Many many thanks :)

Cognitive Dissident
24th October 2013, 06:18
Great. One other thought, which is about heat therapy. Normal organs can tolerate high heat but cancer cannot. Lloyd Pye had this treatment at Marinus and found it very helpful - see his Facebook page where he blogged in detail about his successful treatment. Also, he said that Ronald Reagan was successfully and secretly treated for cancer in Germany when he was President. And heat therapy is available in the US, but very restricted and secret.

I think this is also worth researching.

Also, some people have cured cancer with molasses and baking soda. The cancer loves the molasses then gets smacked upside the head by the alkaline baking soda... check out google on this one...

foreverfan
25th October 2013, 01:26
Great. One other thought, which is about heat therapy. Normal organs can tolerate high heat but cancer cannot. Lloyd Pye had this treatment at Marinus and found it very helpful - see his Facebook page where he blogged in detail about his successful treatment. Also, he said that Ronald Reagan was successfully and secretly treated for cancer in Germany when he was President. And heat therapy is available in the US, but very restricted and secret.

I think this is also worth researching.

Also, some people have cured cancer with molasses and baking soda. The cancer loves the molasses then gets smacked upside the head by the alkaline baking soda... check out google on this one...

Lloyd Pye is diagnosed with aggresive B-cell lymphoma cancer. Must fight for his life at an alternative center with an outstanding record of turning lymphoma cancer into a chronic illness rather than a fatal disease.

Peace&Love
25th October 2013, 05:34
Great. One other thought, which is about heat therapy. Normal organs can tolerate high heat but cancer cannot. Lloyd Pye had this treatment at Marinus and found it very helpful - see his Facebook page where he blogged in detail about his successful treatment. Also, he said that Ronald Reagan was successfully and secretly treated for cancer in Germany when he was President. And heat therapy is available in the US, but very restricted and secret.

I think this is also worth researching.

Also, some people have cured cancer with molasses and baking soda. The cancer loves the molasses then gets smacked upside the head by the alkaline baking soda... check out google on this one...

Wow thank you Cognitive Dissident. I will definitely look into this material. I know baking soda is a magical chemical compound. Useful for so many things! :)
i will google this molasses trap thingy... got my curious