PDA

View Full Version : Who’s responsible in the Syrian bloodshed?



spiritguide
29th October 2013, 19:23
Will justice be served? It is apparent that someone crossed the red line isn't it time to call them to account.

Article lead in...

Who’s responsible in the Syrian bloodshed?

The Friends of Syria – Who Aren’t

… by Vladimir Odintsov, … and New Eastern Outlook, Moscow


[Editors Note: The world will have a bizarre challenge to sort out as to who is going to be held responsible for the slaughter of the Syrian people by the many outside supporters of the insurgents. Assad has been no angel, but that does not give immunity to those in both the West and the Mid East, patently guilty for aiding and abetting terrorism there.

The UN can't even put up a 'most wanted' list for the Syrian National Council. And with all the video footage of executions we hear nothing from the ICC about attempting to identify those whose faces are clearly seen doing these deeds. They both have revealed themselves as being toothless when it comes to Syria.

When these well blooded Jihadis return to their own countries and begin slaughtering people there, will those who birthed them and gave them wings be held responsible for there future atrocities under the fruit of the tree legal principle. It is time that immunity for state sponsored terrorism be challenged in the public arena, and the ultimate penalty (on both sides) be brought to bear on the guilty. It's the least we can do for the victims, and to protect ourselves... Jim W. Dean ]

________________________________

All dressed up but where are they going
The sponsors of the Syrian opposition – the so-called “friends of Syria” continue their sabre rattling at the meeting they held in London this October.

They sound groundless accusations of the chemical attacks carried out by the Syrian regime, voice the demands for a change of power in Syria, and they insist that from their point of view there’s no other legitimate representative of the Syrian people than the so-called “National coalition”.

All these foul play moves are aimed at the sole purpose – to continue weapon shipments to Syria and send even more mercenaries there since the Syrian people themselves have turned their backs on the “National coalition” that promotes terrorism across the country.

The people around the globe have seen the true face of these “friends”, that launch one media campaign full of false accusations after another. They’ve already accused the Bashar al-Assad regime of the usage of chemical weapons, the killings of innocent civilians and the monstrous human rights abuse.

Today it’s not only the politics around the globe that try to unmask the “friends of Syria”, but the prominent human rights organizations like “Human Rights Watch”. According to the researches carried out by this organization, the “friends of Syria” supported the rebels that are responsible for the bloody massacre that was carried out in Latakia on August 4-18.

During this “operation” more than 190 people were massacred and 200 were taken hostage. The terrorists executed civilians by whole families, killing women, children and the aged. Innocent people were decapitated in the broad daylight!

Link to rest of article...

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/10/29/whos-responsible-in-the-syrian-bloodshed/

Good read.

Peace!

ghostrider
29th October 2013, 23:09
I think the CIA has rebel mercenaries that travel abroad and stir up trouble in every country the U.S. wants to invade and overthrow leaders, grab oil , grab mineral rights, set up bases for future attacks on nearby countries , all in the name of corporations trying to expand their evil empire under the smokescreen of freedom and democracy to grow their consumer base around the globe ... the side benefit is putting fear into the leaders of smaller countries forcing them into trade agreements or giving up land to avoid being in the crosshairs of the next war on terror illusion ...

AxisMundi
30th October 2013, 20:06
I think the CIA has rebel mercenaries that travel abroad and stir up trouble in every country the U.S. wants to invade and overthrow leaders, grab oil , grab mineral rights, set up bases for future attacks on nearby countries , all in the name of corporations trying to expand their evil empire under the smokescreen of freedom and democracy to grow their consumer base around the globe ... the side benefit is putting fear into the leaders of smaller countries forcing them into trade agreements or giving up land to avoid being in the crosshairs of the next war on terror illusion ...

Yes, bang on. This article was published by The Guardian last July. It's possibly the most radical piece ever written in a mainstream newspaper and my jaw dropped when I found it. All the major players are identified: Goldman Sachs, Bilderberg, the CFR and a hole other bunch of rag tag crooks and psychopaths:

http://www.theguardian.com/commentisfree/2012/jul/12/syrian-opposition-doing-the-talking