sushil soni
2nd November 2013, 08:41
Faqir Chand (1886-1981), fondly called Baba Faqir Chand, had a large and devoted following in Punjab state of north India. When he began to initiate disciples, something strange happened. His devotees began seeing his form appear while meditating. Others said that this was caused by the blessed food that the Baba gave them. However, Faqir Chand said that he had no knowledge about this phenomenon.
He wrote: “People say that my form manifests to them and helps them in solving their worldly as well as mental problems, but I d not go anywhere, nor do I know about such miraculous instances” (The Essence of the Truth).
He asked himself: “What about the visions that appear to me? Are they a creation of my own mind, and does my guru also not know about his appearances to me?” Fariq Chand said he realized the truth only after he asked this question. So, he wrote: “All manifestations, visions, and forms that are seen within are mental (illusory) creations” (The Secret of Secrets).
David Christopher Lane, Ph.D., who interviewed Faqir Chand, called this phenomenon “Chandian Effect”, so named because Fariq Chand was the first guru to speak at length about visionary manifestations. Dr Lane designates two major factors in these encounters: “1) the overwhelming experience of certainty which accompanies religious ecstasies; and 2) the subjective projection of sacred forms/figures/scenes by a meditator/devotee without the conscious knowledge of the object/person who is beheld as the centre of the experience”.
Sri Ramana Maharshi, when asked about Jesus’ power to perform miracles, said something what Faqir Chand had taught – Was Jesus aware that he was curing men of their diseases? “Such manifestations are as real as your own reality. In other words, when you identify with the body, you are gross objects; when in subtle body or in mental plane as in dream, you see objects equally subtle; in absence of identification as in deep sleep, you see nothing. The objects seen bear relation to the state of the seer. The same applies to visions of God” (Talk with Sri Ramana Maharshi).
So, it follows that in Chandian Effect, the visions or manifestations seen are not of factual but amalgamation of learnt experiences and subjective effects on the learning. No wonder then Catholics will see Virgin Mary and not Lord Buddha, Hindus will see Lord Shiva and not Moses.
It is apparent from above that Faqir Chand was not aware of his miraculous powers. Does it mean that all gurus likewise are ignorant about their healing gifts, etc?
Jesus asked the crowd that followed him: “Who touched me?” Then a woman suffering from flow of blood came up, and by a brief touch from Jesus was cured. At this Jesus said, “Daughter, your faith has made you well” (Saint Mark).
A year after his first meeting with Sri Ramana Maharshi, Ganapati Muni , while meditating in a temple at Tiruvottiyur, felt distracted and longed for the guidance of his guru. At that moment Sri Ramana Maharshi appeared before him in a remarkable outflow of grace. Year later, Sri Ramana Maharshi hinting at this incident, said: “While the body thus descended to the ground it occurred to me that I was at Tiruvottiyur”.
While the Chandian Effect covers almost all transpersonal visions, the experience of bilocation in Sri Ramana Maharshi’s case may warrant further investigation since the “unknowing” hypothesis present by Faqir Chand applies to a majority of cases. Though these visions are seen as projections of one’s own minds, they cannot be subjected to “reality check”. As Dr Lane says, “the object of devotion in these transpersonal encounters, are, for the most part, not aware of their role”.
He wrote: “People say that my form manifests to them and helps them in solving their worldly as well as mental problems, but I d not go anywhere, nor do I know about such miraculous instances” (The Essence of the Truth).
He asked himself: “What about the visions that appear to me? Are they a creation of my own mind, and does my guru also not know about his appearances to me?” Fariq Chand said he realized the truth only after he asked this question. So, he wrote: “All manifestations, visions, and forms that are seen within are mental (illusory) creations” (The Secret of Secrets).
David Christopher Lane, Ph.D., who interviewed Faqir Chand, called this phenomenon “Chandian Effect”, so named because Fariq Chand was the first guru to speak at length about visionary manifestations. Dr Lane designates two major factors in these encounters: “1) the overwhelming experience of certainty which accompanies religious ecstasies; and 2) the subjective projection of sacred forms/figures/scenes by a meditator/devotee without the conscious knowledge of the object/person who is beheld as the centre of the experience”.
Sri Ramana Maharshi, when asked about Jesus’ power to perform miracles, said something what Faqir Chand had taught – Was Jesus aware that he was curing men of their diseases? “Such manifestations are as real as your own reality. In other words, when you identify with the body, you are gross objects; when in subtle body or in mental plane as in dream, you see objects equally subtle; in absence of identification as in deep sleep, you see nothing. The objects seen bear relation to the state of the seer. The same applies to visions of God” (Talk with Sri Ramana Maharshi).
So, it follows that in Chandian Effect, the visions or manifestations seen are not of factual but amalgamation of learnt experiences and subjective effects on the learning. No wonder then Catholics will see Virgin Mary and not Lord Buddha, Hindus will see Lord Shiva and not Moses.
It is apparent from above that Faqir Chand was not aware of his miraculous powers. Does it mean that all gurus likewise are ignorant about their healing gifts, etc?
Jesus asked the crowd that followed him: “Who touched me?” Then a woman suffering from flow of blood came up, and by a brief touch from Jesus was cured. At this Jesus said, “Daughter, your faith has made you well” (Saint Mark).
A year after his first meeting with Sri Ramana Maharshi, Ganapati Muni , while meditating in a temple at Tiruvottiyur, felt distracted and longed for the guidance of his guru. At that moment Sri Ramana Maharshi appeared before him in a remarkable outflow of grace. Year later, Sri Ramana Maharshi hinting at this incident, said: “While the body thus descended to the ground it occurred to me that I was at Tiruvottiyur”.
While the Chandian Effect covers almost all transpersonal visions, the experience of bilocation in Sri Ramana Maharshi’s case may warrant further investigation since the “unknowing” hypothesis present by Faqir Chand applies to a majority of cases. Though these visions are seen as projections of one’s own minds, they cannot be subjected to “reality check”. As Dr Lane says, “the object of devotion in these transpersonal encounters, are, for the most part, not aware of their role”.