Additional Information about Magnetic Current

[7redorbs]

Additional Information about Magnetic Current


For those 150 thousand who read my articles and treatise on the true nature of electricity and the alternating current electrical transformer in the middle of last year December 2012. Here is some additional information.


"The Current of the earth running thru The Gulf of Mexico alone could turn the engines of every single automobile of the planet around and still have 100 times excess to spare, or an additional 10,000% of electrical power in excess. In fact, enough current running thru the gulf of mexico in inductive kinetic potential motion exceeds the power requirements of the entire planet 100 times over. This being, just the gulf of mexico's loop current. The earth in total, generates enough current for approximately another 100,000 planetary civilisations as current technological and power requirements stand, the universe provides all such motion and derivable kinetic power, on a ceaseless and never-ending daily basis, the competency of men needs but catch up to the grandness of the instrument which stands in front of the eyes"

- Adam Bull, speaking about Technology For a New Future and free Wireless Energy to power the future generations shift from the age of material commerce and the electron to the age of power and the magnetic current.


The invention of electricity

The man who invented the vacuum tube had something but he didn't know what it was. To say he had something he had to know what it was, and in the ordinary case where he did not know what it was he would have to invent, or rather make up a reasoning why it could be, and then he would have to test it in the ways he and everyone else can think of it to hold it up. Then when the man who invented the working vacuum tube was done, another came along and said that the man who invented the thing didn't have the corpuscles that Thomson had to invent to explain it, no, rutherford tells that it was the electron and produces new inventive explanations to support the broken invention of Thomson.

Do you see the problem? Invention.

One man a talented designer, the other a talented inventive scientist, both bared the same fatal flaw, the missing pieces of information, the smallest divisible particles of matter, to which science chases unceasingly, if the electron were to be consisting of two poles and not one negative charge, then the base of science, of the dividing electron - to which we chase - would be all incorrect. And there would be no sound base to stand on for scientists and chemists to make, use and manage electricity or as I prefer to call it magnetic current.


Q. Please take this as positive constructive criticism Adam Bull...

The moment you actually make something that generates such 'free energy' and are able to demonstrate it to others is the moment you will be able to squelch the 'haters' that obviously plague your inner peace.

What you should do is ignore them and focus on making your project work instead of catering to said 'haters'...because their whole purpose is to distract you.

If you are confident in You and are honest, the words of others can have absolutely no effect on you. Let that hate go and replace it with Love for yourself and others.

A. Whilst I respect and admire the gratification that some may take in pointing out constructively or destructively failings that may or may not exist in my work - I am more than happy to answer them!

Whilst I appreciate it is difficult to always answer probing and deep questions, I significantly enjoy discussing the physical and technical problems and goals of the work. Both philosophical and artistic, scientific and socio-political.

Whilst you say that the words of others have absolutely no effect on me. I believe you are mistaken. Any word spoken to any person has an effect. But the question is, is the effect a positive or negative one in it's meaning and intention.

In my works, particularly these ones responding to scepticism about someone's reservation about one of my familiar piece of writing that I have been involved for some time - the whole purpose of the response is to educate. In all my experiences, I have successfully conveyed the principles as I understand to many skeptical and completely believers. It makes no difference to me which it is, but that the calculations of my work are correct. And whilst you are correct that responding to doubt is by necessity of fact a painful and annoying exercise which can distract the most moral and patient among us - there can be no more deserving delivery than the truth which one knows, that another could understand to better themself. And that my friend is why I choose to respond to the distractions, because although they risk to distract me, I see them as people whom could learn the benefit of a discussion of my researches, and I see it as an opportunity for me to check my own workings. To which, the inventor and scientist in my opinion, like any philosopher be constantly engaged.

ELECTRON & ELECTROMAGNETIC TRANSVERSE WAVE A NON EXISTING THING MADE UP OF TWO CURRENTS NOT ONE
all particles consist of north and south pole from battery or generator, and an electron can be born only in this way

If scientists had tested the electron by more direct means they would have noted that the only way to see an electron was with another electron.

For instance, every scientists knows that the eye ball in the head must consist of those electrons and those protons, and have the negative and positive charge of electricity, and for any electron or photon or any particle for that matter to be detected by those rods, then one current must run against the other. Or in other words, the proton and the electron of the eye ball and the north and south pole that the light consisted of react to create an image, but the two exist as completely separate components.

Magnetic Field is in constant motion from north pole to south pole and south pole to north pole. There is a perpetual motion or running magnetic current in the transformer.

For instance in earlier electrical systems, there were 2 waves that had to be kept in check. Further, GE system of single pole is wrong, as it has 2 wires, which always implies a negative and positive resistance depending on the end of termination at the spark gap. Spark gap having died a death results in fewer people experimenting with electricity, in some cases with dangerous electricity, and so never gets a sense that something that should only be travelling inside of a wire can be felt by a hand meters, and in some cases miles away.

This being no different than the "spooky" action of a person looking at the back of somebody elses head, it is proof enough there is a positive and negative beam from the eye socket, that goes out and travels to hit the matter of the persons brain, and so causes a minute contraction of it, like an electric current running thru a muscle, but much more sensitive.

If the brain was not so delicate, and if people felt their muscles contract in their head like I do, and suffer from the migraines and headaches, they would realise that the brain was a physical thing, like arm muscle.

Muscles are built up from the north and south pole magnets, because the atoms themselves that we consist of are too. First we eat the plant, and then some other animal eats us, and they break down the north and south pole magnets that the plants taken in from the sun, or the animal taken in from the plant, or the animal taken in from the animal taken from the plant, known as the food chain, reveals that the muscles require the north and south pole, or positive and negative charge required for operating heart , lungs, or brain. I have experimented with a new type of battery that has given me a new unique ability. The possibility of modifying consciousness.

In search of Pyramid Builders,


Best Wishes,
Author

[7redorbs]

Additional Information 2


Thermal Dynamics

SCIENCE DOES NOT EXPLAIN NATURE OF PARTICLE RESPONSIBLE FOR HEAT AS IT HAS NOT BEEN "PROVEN" YET (and must be smaller than an electron to be a fundamental particle of matter) - behold the scientific "enigma". - blind ignorant Fiction in the disguise of a new invention.

When the sun heats up the ocean, it evaporates into a cloud. Nobody knows exactly what heat is, but the sun has it. So someone invented the photon to explain it.

The sun heats up the ocean, it evaporates into the cloud, and the air also has the current running and more one side of the earth than the other and so the earth spins and the wind blows and transports the water from the ocean in the millions of metric tonnes to the top of a mountain, where it falls as rain, and then is pulled down the hill by gravity to feed the river, which in turn has the motion and can push around a turbines north and south pole magnets which run by the stator transformer winding, where the electron is born. As you can see the electron was produced by the north and south pole magnet in motion, in the same manner the rotation of the earth, the evaporation and the wind of the earth was caused. Without the base and frame of motion, there is no electricity that can be made.

For instance, electricity can be made with a battery, we know that the battery works by dissolving the matter into it's parts and it produces the north and south pole magnets in a transformer or electric magnet. So the magnets come from somewhere. It is a question of where they are coming from, the earth, or the matter, or the electrons of the atoms. If it were the electrons of the atom's that made the electricity, I would not expect to see that the generator cannot make electricity without any atom that does not posses both the poles, and, any generator either dc or ac that can make electricity without the north and south poles, and / or a commutator. This should be prove enough that without the motion of sun, or motion of river, there is no electricity in the transformer. Before the one half sided electricity of the electron was made in the transformer and was born, it was a north and south pole magnet. It could be that because the generator produces the same kind of electricity that a battery can, and that a battery is needed to make a bar magnet for the generator, that the frame and base of the electric current has both poles, rather than just the electrons.

These are the findings that I made in my researches and experiments,

The Earth

People need to depend on the earth for their health, wealth and life. Or they are misled by their own incorrect idea's. The problem started when they got from Tesco and Sainsburys and Wal Mart, Microsoft, And Oracle, and Sony. Of course all along, the earth for which all these companies depend, is what made their oils so rich and worthy of their wallets. Having not left this planet earth yet, we rely on it, and, in turn it relies on us - us janitors, to guide it's meaning and direction for the forward advancement of man. And then there is humanity today. Lost, forgotten, misled, not by himself, but by the corporate entity.

The Universe

Many individuals have pointed out to me that it is already discovered that the universe has enough energy for humanity, this was all during which I was speaking of the "energy crisis" in terms of men's incompetence to reason, fathom and design an efficient system for extracting these energies for the purpose of the life on this planet, and in it's eventuality most likely leaving the planet for others. These many individuals who have pointed out to me that it is already discovered - have missed the point - this is a battle not of whit, but of competency. And indeed - the former may depend on the latter by such great extent that any man speaking against the instrument of god and the universe ought to be chastised for attempting to convey or dismiss something beyond not only the breadth of their experience and reasoning, but their very consciousness and being. For those that chastised me in this way - that is the very quinquennial comments following the advancement of science reveal that the instrument, in it's awe, brilliance , dignity and grace existed all along, but for blind - ignorant, worthless men but to see it.

These are the only thoughts I can offer to a blind man. And theirs are the only thoughts they can convey to their limited universe, but of course it is one's right of ignorance, and in my case I am ignorant to the limitations set by my fellow men. And so they seek to set about limiting my self. And, those same fellows, will grow angry, if unable to limit such efforts, and, if possible kill it alltogether. My objective here is not to kill my fellow man, or to slay their idea's or reasonings and mental faculties, but to uplift their spirits and to attempt to point the way to a better, and happier place. What more reasoning does a man on this earth exist to have, and what better reasoning, than to attempt to improve the conditions which each man, woman and kid child struggles each day. These simple things, we look at each day. We must not be so bold to say that we understand them, or we would as a people become crippled and stifled in our abilities to change our understandings. And without that change, there can be no progression or advancement to the goals and meanings that I have set out. And for my persons, it is not a thing I could live with staying silent on. Most of all my annoyance, for the dim , ignorant - blind - fictional minds speaking out so violently. Be gone you darned fools, see the excitement of humanity, the advancement and cycle of progression. It is inevitable, but what wonder and beauty to be in the wondrous and delightful position to suggest, less others would attempt to take away mans right to talk. At least they have not done that yet, one is able to express himself completely freely, that is except in public buildings, and local parks, science magaizines and associations, corporate meetings, and scientific papers - man maintains a completely non captive freedom on his thoughts, and exploration. So to those few people, who asked, what on earth it was that I was talking about, I was talking about the thing they were ignoring. People should depend on the earth, and not a 3rd party, less the 3rd party be trusted enough not to hold at ransom your livelyhood. And this - we see today - and the delightful dream stolen, for the same greed - blind - ignorant - fictitious electron - that borne the entire theft of the original technology of radio. These lies are available in each text book, but mine own might be chastised by all of humanity, for the rationale and reasoning of the unfamiliarity such thoughts of a scientific heretic such as I could fathom, or consider. How dare he - they say. Brave, courageous, unceasing, obsessive, impatient, accidental - all things possessing of the true art these achievements could be invest. But instead, men, invest their livelyhood and their wallets in these 3rd parties, and in so doing are rewarded in kind. With poverty, tyranny and the destruction that war brought as a result of nothing but the condition of limitation.
Men should look to un-limiting their abilities not because it does not pose a risk to the progressive science and art, but because the very progression of the science and art depends on the change of unlimiting the conscious dimensions of thought. In just 60 years we have begun to investigate a virtual world of numbers, and picture, in another 100 we will have mastered the virtual world of ourselves. And in another 100, grander things are yet to await. The beckoning of the larger organism beats louder until - the grandness of the universal instrument of our very being and god becomes clear not by invention or inscription or art, but the very nature of being - there is no need to invent a concept or reason it out if it is already understood by complete and unlimited observation to understand it. And so the grand concept of our ancestors reverence for the "God", and it's meaning, is seen by this scientists and philosopher as a "goal" to which evolution itself reaches. Again - blind -ignorant - fictional theories allowed to live on in science, against perceived dogma of the past, are likely one of the foremost reasons that it has been so long for such a simple observation to be made. Further more, an explanation why a man such as I could have remarked such a thing and been alone in it.

Radioactivity, Gravity, Dense Matter and Cosmic Rays of Stars

I believe that the earth creates gravity in the same manner that radium and uranium produce radioactive alpha beta and gamma particles, which can drive machinery. Such as Nuclear Power Plant or Crookes Tube.

I have observed that the cosmic rays , faster than light, smaller than an electron, come from other stars, in a way where the radiation from our own is almost negligible in comparison. The radiation is completely dark, and does not travel at light speed, and therefore is completely invisible to the instrumentation we posses, or in what an academic might refer to as a "sub state". The conclusion of the hypothesis being that the "electron" could be an effect caused by some other outside force which gives the chemicals their motion. In the same manner that the radioactivity produced by radium and uranium could be caused by some outside source, rather than by it's mass, which could allow for the creation of even dense matter, colliding with the cosmic rays, to create the north and south pole of the planet. Which is, in planetary electrical terms, no different whatsoever from a spherical magnet of tremendous inductive capability. And for all intensive purposes, whilst in motion, has the capacity for generating magnetic or if people prefer electric currents we call lightning.

Best Wishes,
Author

[Carmody]

There was no need to derail the potential for discussion with a bunch of kitten photos.

I happen to very much agree with the idea of a dual vortex (one in, one out) 2d source point for the 3d particle. In my experience, it is the only thing that describes multidimensional aspects, and the entire pantheon of all the combined experiences and science of humanity - in the basics and into the cutting edge, and beyond.

If all of the aspects of science, psychic sensitivity, dimensional energies, cold fusion, hot fusion, time, human time sense, human remote viewing, anti gravity craft, dimensional craft, multiple dimensions, anything you can think of that is speculated of being real from human reports...all of it, all science and suspected/projected science.. as a single unified whole....can only be explained by addressing fundamental particle function as a pairing of 2d vortexes, locked in a dance.


~~~~~~~

It is the only thing that covers it all, as a key point and key that opens the door, in the whole damn works.

[gripreaper]

There was no need to derail the potential for discussion with a bunch of kitten photos.

Hopefully the mods will see this blatant attempt to derail the most cogent and relevant topic of importance at this time in our evolution. Pretty lame.


I happen to very much agree with the idea of a dual vortex (one in, one out) 2d source point for the 3d particle. In my experience, it is the only thing that describes multidimensional aspects, and the entire pantheon of all the combined experiences and science of humanity - in the basics and into the cutting edge, and beyond.

If all of the aspects of science, psychic sensitivity, dimensional energies, cold fusion, hot fusion, time, human time sense, human remote viewing, anti gravity craft, dimensional craft, multiple dimensions, anything you can think of that is speculated of being real from human reports...all of it, all science and suspected/projected science.. as a single unified whole....can only be explained by addressing fundamental particle function as a pairing of 2d vortexes, locked in a dance. It is the only thing that covers it all, as a key point and key that opens the door, in the whole damn works.

And these oscillations between the polarities of the electromagnetic spectrum animates life in form, from formlessness based on conscious intention which hold the hologram in form until we change it to something else. Tesla figured it out.

[Bubu]

[B]

"The Current of the earth running thru The Gulf of Mexico alone could turn the engines of every single automobile of the planet around and still have 100 times excess to spare, or an additional 10,000% of electrical power in excess. In fact, enough current running thru the gulf of mexico in inductive kinetic potential motion exceeds the power requirements of the entire planet 100 times over. This being, just the gulf of mexico's loop current. The earth in total, generates enough current for approximately another 100,000 planetary civilisations as current technological and power requirements stand,
Author


jeezzzz if somebody could just teach me how to turn 1 percent of that........

[Bubu]

I have [B]experimented with a new type of battery that has given me a new unique ability. The possibility of modifying consciousness.

In search of Pyramid Builders,


Best Wishes,
Author


:confused::confused::confused:

[7redorbs]

Although there already had been a happy attempt to fulfil this posting with pictures of the much adorably cute kittens I thought that I should resume with some additional information about the non existent electron, especially given the kind others who felt it their duty to step in and give the opportunity for me to speak, that is without the hazard of the unusual human response of furry kittens. Perhaps proof enough there is a time and place for everything, or not as the case may be.


ELECTRONS ARE A NON EXISTENT THING
argument for and against

Q. An electron makes light by emitting a single photon as it jumps down from a higher shell to a lower one in an atom. This phenomena has been well studies and is the reason why the electron configuration of an atom determines what frequency spectra of light it will emit when heated.

Aside from you ignoring again the fact that electricity can be generated by other means than a generator, for example a battery could be charged by a solar cell, it is very evident that an electron can make light.

The rest of your post does not seem to address the questions I asked. I dont see your reasoning as to why it must be cosmic radiation that causes the release of energy in nuclear fission.

A. I can make all kinds of light with just magnets. Are you sure it is the electron making the light?

For instance space is completely dark, there is no light, and a vacuum tube or wire is also completely dark. To make a light there must be an obstruction, and there must be more magnets coming in the wire than can escape.

Then you will get your photon, or electron.

But the photon is not primary. The primary thing is the north and south pole, or rather the positive and negative particles of the batteries zinc or iron atoms, or the generators north and south pole bar magnets turning in motion to create the so-called electron in the filament.

There are two currents, not one. And electron only implies one direction of current. If thomson and rutherford had used more ordinarily direct means and not neglected the 4th terminal then this situation could have been easily avoided, and an incorrect science could have been built on the real primary wireless electricity, instead of the nonsense that passes for science today - a blind fiction and ignorant truth.

You said earlier in a previous post that "nuclear decay is a result of atoms instability". Wrong, the sun itself influences the decay rate. It is proof enough that it could already be well more complicated than you or any other think.

What's more, radioactivity having been discovered barely a century, we have not been observing the atoms currents relative to the universe or even the planet for more than approximately 0.000002% of many samples.

Not very good is it? This is the science that is supposed to "pass of" with carbon dating. Regardless I say REGARDLESS of the fact that PROVEN PEER REVIEWED ACADEMIC science shows such things to be non linear - or rather unreliable variables which are not constant.

Given that the mass itself of the object is fixed, a non constant delineation in the results of radioactive decay, not accounted by mass then must include the factoring of an outside external force such as the magnetic currents I have described.

I am very sorry that you do not see my reasoning Chay, but I cannot see how an electron could consist of anything other than a north and south pole. And, most importantly, without the north and south pole and the motion of the sun or a transformer, I do not see how light or electrons can be made, though I am sure you wil be quick to tell me if you can consider such a thing.

Please note I would be more than delighted to hear it, but please do consider that it is not the first time I have heard the basic theories of photonic production from the electron, or the entanglement principle, or the energy equivalence terminology used by electricians today.

None of it is lost on me whatsoever. Quite clearly I have stated, the electron is one current, and is only one half of the matter in the battery or the poles in the generator. They are neglecting one half of their electricity,

Best,
A

[7redorbs]

I would like to add I am sorry to those approximately 15 men and women who had written to me messages or questions on the forum that I had not returned earlier this year. I believe they know why they are.


Best,
A

[TargeT]

I have [B]experimented with a new type of battery that has given me a new unique ability. The possibility of modifying consciousness.

In search of Pyramid Builders,


Best Wishes,
Author


:confused::confused::confused:


yes, more on this battery please, I see the storage and retrieval of power as a key stumbling block for us less educated in the magic of the electricity/magnetism/gravity phenomenon.

[Rocky_Shorz]

I was given a vision of a battery technology other civilizations use that understand true electronics...

it had an infinity loop inside with a crossing point in the center where particles collide energizing the others to continue in motion...

don't really understand how it would help continuously charge the battery, but since you are going deep I thought I would share with you a hidden technology they recommend we start using.

they think 10-15% energy loss moving power to a battery and again drawing it out is foolish...

switching from A/C to D/C then back again is a 20% loss...

hope this idea from another world will help in moving forward...

[7redorbs]

NON EXISTENT THINGS
A science of a secondary particle
Called the primary electron

I found that electricity can only be produced by matter (atoms) or by a generator with the spinning magnets. I noted the characteristic of the electricity is exactly the same from a generator with the spinning magnets or by the battery with the positive and negative particles of matter, but if the character of electricity is the same, then where is the magnets in motion of the atoms in the battery, there is only supposed to be an electron, but if they were the same thing electrically then it would be expected to find the north and south pole magnets in motion in the atoms in the battery, and if they were said to be different things in scientific text books, but both produced the same electricity, I thought that there was something wrong about the electron. There had to be two currents in the generator of north and south pole magnets running past a stator to get the electricity, but if the battery produced the same electricity then where is the motion of the north and south pole magnets that the generator used to produce electricity. It seemed wrong every time, because the 30 protons and 30 electrons were in the matter of the battery and could make the same electricity as the generator. So I wondered then, if there was only supposed to be electrons leaving the atoms what happened to the other half of the electricity that was in the battery that would ordinarily be seen in a generator's bar magnets. If the electricity is the same then I wondered where the bar magnets were inside the atom to produce the same electron the generator did with it's magnets. I estimated that they either could not be the same thing, or the electron was a non existent thing. Having seen the ordinary operation of a flywheel I can say that there is no electrons until after the magnets in the flywheel or turbine has passed towards and away from the stator transformer winding usually consisting of an iron core and a copper coil around it, there simply are no electrons in sight whatsoever until the magnet produced the electron. I believe it tells that the electron could not possibly be the base of electricity because the flywheel produced the electrons after it rotated, and given that the atoms were always rotating, how could it produce anything less than the electrons, but how could it be that the protons and electrons did not consist of magnets. Especially in the usual case that the electron itself only need run through another atom with the 30 protons and 30 electrons or at the right hand twist in a coil around a core, to put the magnets back into it.

If the electron did not have the magnets as is insisted, then the electron had something to make the north and south pole appear in the transformer or conductor, such as the electric magnet I have here. Even if the electron were not to have the magnets, and even were electrons possible to be made with anything other than the motion of magnets, then the scientist still needs to account where the electrons running around in the coil got the magnets that appeared in it's core. If it worked the way the scientists say then the electron must have pushed out some of the magnets in the metal, and so accounted for the magnetic current. If it worked in the way that I say then the electron is too much connected with the generators north and south pole bar magnets in motion, and if the battery produced them about by the same way then the metals in the battery and the conductor have the north and south pole magnets inside, just at low pressure, and so this could account why dense matter such as uranium, and deeper under the earth could be caused to become unstable and throw out their extra north and south pole magnets if they are bombarded by too much coming in from the external force of cosmic rays to this planet. And so could then account for how mass and density can produce the gravitation in stars, planets and collapsed ones too.

Read about Edward Leedskalnins magnetic current and my 2 years of experiments with electricity that produced the book Technology For a New Future, and find out that the electron of rutherford and the corpuscle of thomson are not as safe as the inventive science thinks, they were then not correctly managing electricity because they did not know what it is. Until now, it was years until it was known that the inventors vacuum tube consisted of something else than his corpuscles, but it did not stop him, or Rutherford inventing the electron after him, and it certainly did not stop the ones before or after him from managing the electricity, thinking that they knew what it is, or knowing what it wasn't and profiting from that non existent electron. It is wrong. It is always wrong and it will be wrong all the time until someone accounts for the rest of the external things. I have noticed my compass instruments point slightly away from the real magnetic pole, and the real magnetic pole can shift, the only reason I can figure for any magnet in my laboratory to change, is if some other magnet external to it with the motion runs by it. In my research I learnt something about gravitation and the cause of chemical motion.

I figured that I was going to find out what electricity was and that I was not going to be fooled by wrong drawings in text books, and that I was going to find each thing out for myself. And I would like to encourage everyone who reads this writing to try and do the same.

Best Wishes,
A

[7redorbs]

https://fbcdn-sphotos-f-a.akamaihd.net/hphotos-ak-ash4/1398262_10151775987353481_924457307_o.jpg

Maybe this will provoke a more inspired response.

No electrons in sight at all only magnets and the way the north and south pole runs in relation to eachother. As i explained this is how an electron can come about, but it is also how anything else could theoretically come about, like zinc, or iron, or gold, or any other thing. Academics familiar with the "island of stability" understand that if the location and velocity of all parts of an atom can be calculated then the age old idea of alchemy can be achieved, ironically J J thomson being one of the first alchemists to achieve such a thing.

Best,
A

Best,
A

[Hughe]

People need to compare different theories to find which one is the best for practical applications. General public and experts themselves never informed alternative theories in science. That's why this world turned into dying civilization. Only way to break away the pattern of destruction is to people start educating themselves and study other theories that work against mainstream paradigm. For example there is the mighty Big Bang theory which supported by established scientists without a single doubt. Right? As soon as one spends few hours on Electric Universe, intuition starts questioning the Big Bang theory at fundamental level: common sense and logic.

I totally agree with what OP says and supports what he does with my heart. Even though I found a new theory that I've been interest into.

The Energy simply exits everywhere in Nature. How to tap into and extract usable energy by non-destructive, harmonic way is what Free Energy technologies are all about. Which one is the right one? I don't know honestly.

The bottom line is at least there are coming big changes of mainstream scientific paradigm. I predict that some of feasible Free Energy technologies will be remarkably simple when these devices come out and be used by millions.



THE NOBEL PRIZE BEING AWARDED TO HIGGS

Ph. M. Kanarev
kanarevfm@mail.ru

Announcement. The priority in a correct assessment of the results of the experiments being performed with the help of the elementary particle accelerators belongs to V.I. Rydnik, the Russian scientist. He has found that the notion concerning the elementary particles is made by means of an information synthesis of elastic scattering and inelastic scattering in the elementary particle accelerators. According to him, a complexity of this task can be compared with a situation being described in the tale about the blind men: “Hey, the elephant is a pillar,” said the first man who touched the elephant leg. “It is like a rope,” said the second man who touched the tail. “It is like a thick branch of a tree,” said the third man who touched the trunk of the elephant. And so on.