PDA

View Full Version : Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine'



Corncrake
4th November 2013, 14:26
Have just been listening to the Corbett Report on 'Rockefeller Medicine' posted by Giovanni on his 'Godless Gatherings with a Lust to Share' thread. It features extracts with Eustace Mullins whom I have not come across before but evidently did a lot of research into the Federal Reserve in the late 1940's on behalf of Ezra Pound and went on to write a book that was later updated and republished as the Secrets of the Federal Reserve. He then wrote Murder by Injection published in 1988. Of course he has been damned by some of those in the mainstream as a 'conspiracy theorist'. I think the video is worth giving a thread of its own:

X6J_7PvWoMw

grannyfranny100
4th November 2013, 15:00
Rockefeller was not dumb. Prescription meds meant profit. The herbs used by homeopaths meant no profit. He and his foundation cooked up a long term plan to achieve their objective: take over hospital medical schools with financing, place his minions on the boards, orient medical education to big pharma and subsequent graduates would have no frame of reference for herbal medicine. This approach worked

Peace&Love
4th November 2013, 19:45
As an MD i totally agree with what you wrote grannyfranny100.

Snookie
5th November 2013, 05:45
I'm tempted to send this to my sweetie's son (who is a Dr) & granddaughter (who is going to Med school), in the hope it will wake them up.

grannyfranny100
5th November 2013, 07:41
A friend, MSW, is counseling a medical student in his residency. He is having a tough time reconciling his caring reasons for being in medicine with the cold reality of the field. He can't drop out with all his educational loans. What a tough realization.

Once and a while someone like Regina Meredith now on Gaiam interviews someone who has their M.D. but skewed his path and adds other perspectives and/or credentials to their work. Often they are attacked/raided by FDA or IRS and have to leave the U.S. to practice medicine on their own terms.

Some peer reviewed medical journals are slanted because they are often underwritten by big pharma. Even non profits such as the Cancer Society are not open to research proposals that seem too close to alternative medical approaches. Some M.D. may be close to getting a grant, the organization's leadership changes and the grant is disallowed.

The few M.D.s I have found who add an adjunctive approach to their practice are often outcasts and put down by their peers in a community. In one place where I lived there were many closed practices and I had to promise to stop seeing an outcast doctor before being allowed to be a patient in a local primary care practice. I suspected this outcast doctor could read auras and used this as part of his way to diagnose patients and then confirm with traditional testing procedures. Mind you he never would admit to seeing auras but that is what I thought.

Another M.D. who practiced traditional allopathic medicine also practiced NAET which I found very helpful for allergies. One side effect was I no longer had a cat allergy even though we weren't directly working on that allergy. During one session, he entered my treatment room overjoyed because he managed to ended a Japanese girl's allergy to rice and she could now enjoy the traditional cuisine of her family's heritage. They were stationed in my local midwest community by a Japanese company. If one looks at allopathic speciality of allergies, that speciality is still using techniques which are the same ones I experienced 50 years ago!

Or consider Dr. Mercola with his nutritional online approach. He donated a million dollars to the anti GMO fight in CA. All these anti GMO folks are just asking for a choice through labeling. They aren't focused on a demand to end GMOs. In the current Washington state battle, Monsanto and DuPont, etc. are being joined by Kellogs and other food manufacturers indirectly through the grocery manufacturers organization so their big names aren't mentioned directly.

Meanwhile international stats on health care do not have the U.S. as number one any longer despite all the high tech devices used here. People like the Chinese do bring U.S. doctors to China to enhance and integrate Western medicine in their country but one does not read of U.S. MDs going to China to explore their approaches.

We may not burn witches at the stake any more but the forces of the old paradigm sure have on heck of a bag of tricks to keep medical progress for moving forward.