PDA

View Full Version : New VT article suggesting towers may have been pre-wired



mountain_jim
5th November 2013, 17:50
http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/11/04/skyscrapers-pre-wired-to-come-down/

I find the article and the letters following interesting - particularly the alleging in the comments that the buildings would have to have been taken down by 2007 anyway due to known at erection time aluminum failure issues

I realize this does not explain all the anomalies but does show more reasons for why Larry may have bought these with plans to bring them down later.

Here are 2 posts from a commenter following article:



Tis' I, Howard Lewis III. Having had **** shoved in my face and been called insane by most over the past 43 years, I can again state that I documented these preset demolition systems back in 1969 to 1972 before the zionist alley rats stripped articles from trade journals and newspapers in libraries across America. public and university libraries were my sources of documentation back then. I think life is becoming safer for you and I, thanx to folks like Yukon Jack and Dr. Jim Fetzer, who aggravated me to shake loose details about these demolition installations and how angry Skilling and Associates people were on the introduction of this system after work had progressed up several stories on the WTCs I and II. I did this documentation so my father could bail out and keep his job and avoid lawsuits. It went deeper and more evil than Yukon Jack has explained. You had to be there. The reasons he states are the same as those expressed in the contracts written up to facilitate these procedures, as managed by the builders, with some room for minor differences. The fact that those involved in these contracts have allowed the number of violent deaths of innocents to exceed one million for subsequent actions to push for their financial gain indicates I speak the truth.
Read input from Jeff Prager, Don Fox, Dr. Ed Ward, MD, Chris Bollyn, Dr. Jim Fetzer, et al concerning the gross negligence and pure arrogance and greed which went into the intentional sacrifice of thousands of office workers, and over a thousand rescue workers, now dead from cancers caused by this sent-from-hell demolition. None of this was necessary. It ALL was for greed and self-aggrandizement. The Rockefeller/Bush criminal cabal controlled the government authority of The Port of New York/New Jersey, New York State, and the White House during this time period. These systems showed up on paper just after Nixon and G.W. Bush slithered through the front door of the White House.
I am currently wondering why Dr. Fetzer is doing his damnedest to keep something in the closet so bad that he would say that although a 200,000 pound to 300,000 pound jet travelling a minimum of 250 miles per hour could not knock out a dozen free hanging steel panels, a super duper hologram could. Please Dr. Fetzer, talk John Lear and those over at Veterans Today into having a friendly chat and we can jail those fools over at the Air Force and elsewhere who betrayed their country and murdered our friends and neighbors, brothers and sisters, moms and dads. Prosecutors do and will cut deals with the first to see the light. The last one in is the guy who stays locked up. The luck gets worse with resistance to justice. Somebody cut the cores, and somebody else knows who ran the substitute jets. Aiding and abetting after the fact can be rewarded with a real nasty poke in the eye. And no dessert. It's over.
The adjacent perimeter panels towards the bottoms of WTC I and II were welded AND bolted together. To minimize the inevitable financial loss, towards the top, the welding together of adjacent perimeter panels was halted, and numerous other cost cutting measures implemented. Rigging them to be knocked out by incoming jets, with out severe distortion would not have been difficult. Unbolting and perhaps some cutting charges. The edges of the floors impacted by the incoming jets neutralized forward momentum. Judging from the numerous impact videos, these jets were travelling under 350 miles per hour as they approached the WTCs. Judging from the large white flashes at impact, recorded by MANY video cameras, including the original Naudet bros. video, a large electrical discharge or other localized high energy event occurred a fraction of a second before contact. Paper and pencil work for the details.

.....

Your schedule and thesis as to the why they had to come down when they did. Listen closely. Are you following this? it was documented, i, personally remember the moment of truth, having been in the room, and it explains why so few of the builders have come forward or offered to take polygraphs.
The problem of PERMANENTLY attaching the aluminum siding to the perimeter columns was never solved. The siding had to go up, nonetheless. At that time, IT WAS KNOWN that the buildings would have to come down in 30 to 40 years tops because the aluminum facade would be peeling off by then. This is when the owner/developer instituted the cost-cutting measures to minimize the unavoidable financial loss with WTCs I and II. When the aluminum started to come off, right on schedule, demolition bids went out. The returns ranged from 4.5 to 5.5 billion dollars. Enter Larry Silverstein and a group backing him, whose identity is currently out of my ability to establish. Larry Silverstein KNEW the QWTCs had to come down by 2007, as mandated by the new York/new jersey Port Authority. The documents for this were blown up with the WTCs, but not the hundreds of thousands of periodicals and trade journals covering this fiasco. Who is censoring this? Fakebook or the owners of Veterans Today? Nobody cares about this anyway.

Carmody
5th November 2013, 18:37
Not only that, but the law required that the asbestos insulation be removed. Most definitely before demolition.

The asbestos had to be removed, to the tune of a few billion dollars of expense, then the towers were required to be demolished.

No one in their right mind was going anywhere near the purchase or use of the trade towers. The world trade towers were a standing and well known approximate 10 billion dollar loss. No one would come near them, no one would touch it. Not the city, not the state, not the feds, not private investment, no one.

The deal that I read about, way back in 2002-2005, was that the company that was operating the security for trade towers was 'half-owned' (major shareholder) by Niel Bush. Yes, a bush family member. And that the towers and their security systems were shut down for approximately 30-35 days, as a large crew worked on the trade towers, all night, each night, for this time period. All security shut down. No records of anything being done. Bush family members and associates, they sell the security company for the tower complex, and then..9 months later, the towers come down.

This information was moving into being well known in the early-mid 2000's, via intrepid investigators. Now, it is not so well known.

Hervé
5th November 2013, 18:47
... and Silverstein didn't even pay for them, just a deposit and got reimbursed full price for the two towers via insurance companies and the Deutsche bank....

mountain_jim
5th November 2013, 19:01
Both points referenced (abit) in the article:


Asbestos Removal

The WTC needed asbestos removal, the controlled demolition solved that problem, saving the building operators (Silverfishstein) millions if not billions in extensive repairs.

How can you remove the asbestos and keep the explosives secret? Impossible. It may have been physically impossible to mechanically remove the asbestos without triggering the nano thermite underneath, that was painted on the beams during construction.

What if you knew how the buildings were constructed, and needed them to come down at the end of their useful lifespan? For one thing, if you were really greedy and ruthless, you might up the insurance

AutumnW
5th November 2013, 22:03
Larry is a cosmic level creep.

Snookie
6th November 2013, 02:10
... and Silverstein didn't even pay for them, just a deposit and got reimbursed full price for the two towers via insurance companies and the Deutsche bank....

And then he had the gall to attempt to sue the airlines on top of that!

eaglespirit
6th November 2013, 04:39
Not only that, but the law required that the asbestos insulation be removed. Most definitely before demolition.

The asbestos had to be removed, to the tune of a few billion dollars of expense, then the towers were required to be demolished.

No one in their right mind was going anywhere near the purchase or use of the trade towers. The world trade towers were a standing and well known approximate 10 billion dollar loss. No one would come near them, no one would touch it. Not the city, not the state, not the feds, not private investment, no one.

The deal that I read about, way back in 2002-2005, was that the company that was operating the security for trade towers was 'half-owned' (major shareholder) by Niel Bush. Yes, a bush family member. And that the towers and their security systems were shut down for approximately 30-35 days, as a large crew worked on the trade towers, all night, each night, for this time period. All security shut down. No records of anything being done. Bush family members and associates, they sell the security company for the tower complex, and then..9 months later, the towers come down.

This information was moving into being well known in the early-mid 2000's, via intrepid investigators. Now, it is not so well known.

I had a retired military friend, since passed on, that worked for the fire protection/alarm company that was working in the towers upgrading that system at that time...the alarm/security system was shut down while they did their night work and NO ONE was suppose to be in the towers...he said they consistently heard alot of activity on different floors and were told NOT to go there.

Hervé
6th November 2013, 10:02
All that's to say to the OP that it's a good thing that VT concocted an article gathering most of the data that's been available for a long while and that a flash back on those is a good thing to refresh memories...


:)

mountain_jim
6th November 2013, 13:03
Sometimes when old information is restated and refreshed for newly awakening folks to learn, where I find the most interesting value is the comments, in this case both in th VT article and in this thread, anecdotally, from eaglespirit.

There are many folks out there that know something, and sometimes these articles result in posted info that I was not previously aware of.

ceetee9
6th November 2013, 15:54
Larry Silverstein KNEW the QWTCs had to come down by 2007, as mandated by the new York/new jersey Port Authority. The documents for this were blown up with the WTCs, but not the hundreds of thousands of periodicals and trade journals covering this fiasco.The problem I have with this statement (excepting the mention of periodicals and journals) is that virtually every corporation I've worked for kept copies of their important data (IP, financials, etc.) in multiple sites so I don't buy the argument that the only copies of these documents were "blown up" with the WTCs. The same goes for the argument that all the documents related to the Pentagon's missing $2 trillion dollars were destroyed with WTC7.

No corporation with any sense keeps all their data in one place. And this doesn't even address the fact that there were multiple companies who bid on demolishing the WTCs and, certainly, their records would not have been kept in the WTC buildings.

Without question, if these allegations are true--and I have little doubt that they aren't--plenty of documentation supporting these allegations exists and thus there are many people who know it and know where the documents are. Do none of these people have a conscience? Can they all have been bought off?

Tesla_WTC_Solution
9th November 2013, 05:49
Who wants to wager that the plan to stage an aircraft-related disaster at the WTC site should it prove to be a bust existed as early as 1966?

outerheaven
13th November 2013, 14:55
Who wants to wager that the plan to stage an aircraft-related disaster at the WTC site should it prove to be a bust existed as early as 1966?

I'll take you up on that! Dig through the 9/11 predictive programming evidence and you start to get a picture that this was planned for a long time.

Heck, ever look at NASA's Gemini logo?

http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/8/8a/GeminiPatch.png

Even nailed the locations of the explosions. Gee ... what a coincidence.