SHADE the Motion Picture......full movie covering Bilderberg To Geo - engineering

[Cidersomerset]

SHADE the Motion Picture


V4VFYRaltcc


Published on 15 Oct 2013


Shade exposes the true power structure embedded in our global reality, showing the
true controllers their plans to Geo-engineer our planet and control the populace.

[Cidersomerset]

http://rt.com/static/img/static/logo.jpg


Genetically engineered trees under USDA consideration could harm environment - report


Published time: November 08, 2013 03:44
Edited time: November 11, 2013 05:11


http://rt.com/files/news/21/0e/c0/00/000_dv852288.si.jpg

AFP Photo / Patrick Pleul



Tags
Food, GMO, Health, Law, Politics, Protest, Science, USA
As the US Department of Agriculture considers whether to authorize the
unrestricted planting of genetically engineered Eucalyptus trees experts are
warning that such a policy would not only be unnatural, but negatively impact the
environment.

The GE tree is primarily developed by ArborGen, a biotechnology corporation that
has been met with protests in recent months, to provide materials to create paper
and the wood pellets that fuel power plants around the world. Despite the trees’
propensity for cooler climates, ArborGen has sought to promote the trees’ growth in
the south eastern US under the notion that they will help the environment sustain
itself.

Yet a new report from the Center for Food Safety titled “Genetically Engineered
Trees: The New Frontier of Biotechnology” details how GE trees could increase
greenhouse gas emission and reduce biodiversity.

“Commercializing GE trees could be devastating to the environment,” Debbie
Barker, international program director for the Center for Food Safety, told Eco
Watch. “Factory forests’ will accelerate and expand large-scale, chemical-intensive,
monoculture plantations. We need to understand the risks in order to determine if
GE trees are a sustainable way forward or a dangerous diversion.”

Among the concerns laid out in the report is the immediate risk GE trees would
pose to natural trees in the surrounding area. Not only are they expected to suck
up at least twice as much water as normal trees, but GE trees are also known for
their ability to spread seeds and pollens over great distances. If wild trees become
contaminated they could be more vulnerable to pests and pathogens, thus risking
the life span of natural US forests. The GE trees would also require substantial
amounts of fertilizers and pesticides as well.

“Eucalyptus is the first forest tree now being considered for approval for
unrestricted planting, but some of the largest biotechnology, paper and energy
corporations are experimenting on pine, poplar, chestnut and several varieties of
fruit,” said Barker, who also edited the report.

Despite these and other warnings, biotech corporations have a strong incentive to
argue against any environmental objections. If GE eucalyptus is approved,
according to Eco Watch, ArborGen expects that company profits will explode from
$25 million to $500 million in just five years.

Another red flag for the Center for Food Safety is the assertion that burning wood
pellets slows climate change. The report acknowledges that the method, which
involves selling European stumps to European companies so they can keep power
plants running 24 hours a day, helps cut down on the number of sulfur emissions.
But more recent research has found that burning wood pellets likely increases the
presence of other pollutants.

The USDA will consider the adoption of GE tree planting despite what environmental
advocates say are scientific risks, and questions about the integrity of government’s
scrutiny over ArborGen.

Rachel Smolker, co-director of the environmental advocacy group Biofuelwatch,
wrote a column in The Huffington Post earlier this year alleging that vested
commercial interests made rigorous evaluation of the biotech’s venture unlikely.

“Perhaps in part it is a response to the fact that ArborGen has succeeded in placing
key personnel within positions in agencies such as the USDA and Department of
Education where these decisions are made also,” she wrote. “Also, it is clear that
the entire awesome weight of the biomass juggernaut comes into play.”

“Subsidies are flowing into the construction of hundreds of bioenergy ‘renewable
energy’ projects, including plans to convert massive coal plants to burn biomass,
efforts to convert wood into ethanol and other transport fuels, as well as a suite of
other biomass based chemicals and products,” Smolker continued. “The demand,
and the potentially massive profits to be made, are altogether clear.”

http://rt.com/usa/genetically-engineered-usda-harm-environment-404/

[Cidersomerset]

http://shadethemotionpicture.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/08/Banner.png
http://shadethemotionpicture.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/11/Jordan-Maxwell2.png

[sigma6]

http://rt.com/static/img/static/logo.jpg


Genetically engineered trees under USDA consideration could harm environment - report


Published time: November 08, 2013 03:44
Edited time: November 11, 2013 05:11


http://rt.com/files/news/21/0e/c0/00/000_dv852288.si.jpg

AFP Photo / Patrick Pleul



...“Commercializing GE trees could be devastating to the environment,” Debbie
Barker, international program director for the Center for Food Safety, told Eco
Watch. “Factory forests’ will accelerate and expand large-scale, chemical-intensive,
monoculture plantations. We need to understand the risks in order to determine if
GE trees are a sustainable way forward or a dangerous diversion.” ...

...“Subsidies are flowing into the construction of hundreds of bioenergy ‘renewable
energy’ projects, including plans to convert massive coal plants to burn biomass,
efforts to convert wood into ethanol and other transport fuels, as well as a suite of
other biomass based chemicals and products,” Smolker continued. “The demand,
and the potentially massive profits to be made, are altogether clear.”

http://rt.com/usa/genetically-engineered-usda-harm-environment-404/

This sounds insane (again) growing trees that consume twice as much water just to chop them down and burn them????
If they were serious they would at least grow hemp... this has to be an ecological FALS FLAG...

update: and finally someone pointing a finger at that dirty dirty pr*** Bill Gates... Exactly what I have been saying for years, they made a deal after the DOJ Antitrust laws, the son of a 3rd generation of lawyers ringed in by the lawyers... and I didn't even know that he joined the CFR after the DOJ Anti-trust law "disappearing act"

Also his biggest investments are Monsanto and Blackwater (whatever they have renamed themselves today) and this is just what we see...