PDA

View Full Version : Hell Explained by Chemistry Student



Kristin
6th December 2013, 02:11
Hell Explained by Chemistry Student

The following is reputed to be an actual question given on a University of Arizona chemistry mid term, and an actual answer turned in by a student.

The answer by one student was so “profound” that the professor shared it with colleagues, via the Internet, which is, of course, why we now have the pleasure of enjoying it as well:

Bonus Question: Is Hell exothermic (gives off heat) or endothermic (absorbs heat)?

Most of the students wrote proofs of their beliefs using Boyle’s Law (gas cools when it expands and heats when it is compressed) or some variant.

One student, however, wrote the following:

“First, we need to know how the mass of Hell is changing in time. So we need to know the rate at which souls are moving into Hell and the rate at which they are leaving, which is unlikely. I think that we can safely assume that once a soul gets to Hell, it will not leave.Therefore, no souls are leaving. As for how many souls are entering Hell, let’s look at the different religions that exist in the world today.

“Most of these religions state that if you are not a member of their religion, you will go to Hell. Since there is more than one of these religions and since people do not belong to more than one religion, we can project that all souls go to Hell. With birth and death rates as they are, we can expect the number of souls in Hell to increase exponentially. Now, we look at the rate of change of the volume in Hell because Boyle’s Law states that in order for the temperature and pressure in Hell to stay the same, the volume of Hell has to expand proportionately as souls are added.

“This gives two possibilities:

“1. If Hell is expanding at a slower rate than the rate at which souls enter Hell, then the temperature and pressure in Hell will increase until all Hell breaks loose.

“2. If Hell is expanding at a rate faster than the increase of souls in Hell, then the temperature and pressure will drop until Hell freezes over.

“So which is it?

“If we accept the postulate given to me by Teresa during my Freshman year that, ‘It will be a cold day in Hell before I sleep with you,’ and take into account the fact that I slept with her last night, then number two must be true, and thus I am sure that Hell is exothermic and has already frozen over. The corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct–leaving only Heaven, thereby proving the existence of a divine being. Which explains why, last night, Teresa kept shouting ‘Oh my God.’”

This student received an A+.

From the Heart,
Kristin

johnf
6th December 2013, 02:39
Finally! A student who is paying attention, aaaaand doing thier homework!

jf

Ivanhoe
6th December 2013, 02:42
Thanks Kristin, That was the best laugh I've had in a while. :thumb:

GreenGuy
6th December 2013, 03:12
Saw this years ago, and still enjoy it. I think it puts both the value of religion and the value of a college education in their proper place.

Kristin
6th December 2013, 04:09
"Griff" shared that one with me this evening. I have to admit to several chuckles and an all out laugh when "...hell freezes over." Brilliant.

From the Heart,
Kris

Bright Garlick
6th December 2013, 06:29
Best chemistry answer ever !

I wonder whether he would have thought souls in Hell were poikilothermic or homeothermic ???
I suppose it depends on whether he's getting laid !

¤=[Post Update]=¤

It seems to me that biology was his real strength !

Violet
6th December 2013, 08:18
Finally! A student who is paying attention, aaaaand doing thier homework!

jf

That's one homework that teacher will never forget :cool:

Just one thing I don't get. In the last part there's a rather fast conclusion that the corollary of this theory is that since Hell has frozen over, it follows that it is not accepting any more souls and is therefore, extinct .

I take hell can freeze over and it can also burn over. Obviously if it freezes over, souls can't get in because there's no space for them vacant. But if it burns over, and fire - unlike ice - has no occupying mass to prevent entrance, it will coal the soul right at the entrance thus also not "accepting" any more souls.

If the souls are standing at the entrance waiting, they'll die/decompose (aren't they dead already) for heat or cold. Either way, no new souls are getting in.

Hell is therefor not extinct then. It's still there, burning or freezing. It's the souls destined for hell that are extinct imo...that is, if you take souls to be composed of mass.

araucaria
6th December 2013, 11:06
As a very young Jordan Maxwell said to the bishop: 'If I can't burn an angel's wings with my Dad's blowlamp...', then the whole thing is a farce.
:)