PDA

View Full Version : Scientists Insist Iraq Nuked by US.... VT article



spiritguide
7th December 2013, 17:31
If you read anything at length this is a must for putting color into your dot to dot picture. IMHO

Article lead in...

Scientists Insist Iraq Nuked by US

by Jim Fetzer, Leuren Moret, and Christopher Busby

[Editors Note: VT had a rare triple play today as Gordon swept Press TV with this trouncing of Duncan Hunter and his asinine comments about nuking Iran if need be. Gordon had put in a Viewpoints commentary last night, and then had an interview this morning where he said Hunter must have been on drugs or insane to say something this irresponsible.

The interview is now the top story on Press TV today, very rare for an interview. And the originalcommentary article is the number three read AND...late in the day they did another spin off article that Hunter might have used nukes himself in Fallujah where he was a nuclear artillery officer. This is the first time I have ever seen them do a triple story on one theme.

Gordon had cited Jim Fetzer's work below, a hefty piece of work. My missive today is just making the point that we try to keep old work alive by tying it into new breaking stories to help new readers especially with some dot connecting help. It's also our way of saying thanks for a job well done which Jim and crew certainly did here. Press TV links follow ... Jim W. Dean ]

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/12/06/338538/nuke-iran-congressman-was-on-drugs/

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/12/06/338462/lets-nuke-iran-like-we-did-to-iraq/

http://www.presstv.ir/detail/2013/12/06/338581/hunter-may-have-nuked-iraq-as-marine/

____________________________________

Heavy firepower was used in Fallujah in 2004
HEAVY FIRE POWER WAS USED IN FALLUJAH IN 2004: U.S. Marines fire Nov. 11, 2004, on Fallujah with a 155 mm Howitzer.

One of the weapons originally designed for this artillery piece was a tactical nuclear weapon (that could include a neutron warhead) designed by Samuel Cohen, to be fired in eastern Europe on Soviet troops during President Ronald Reagan’s term in office.

On Friday, 28 October 2011, it was my honor to host Leuren Moret and Christopher Busby as my guests on “The Real Deal”, an internet radio program broadcast on M/W/F from 5-7 PM/CT over revereradio.net. Leuren Moret is an independent geoscientist who has done expert studies on the Fukushima disaster, radiation problems around the world including depleted uranium.

Dr. Christopher Busby is a visiting biomedical studies professor at the University of Ulster and is the co-author of reports about the effects of depleted uranium in Iraq especially in relation to Fallujah. What Busby found much to his surprise was not DU but enriched uranium instead.

The interview was extraordinary on many counts. During the first hour, Leuren reported on the latest research about Fukushima and laid out a background for understanding the issues that she and Busby and I would discuss during the second hour.

It has become apparent from Busby’s research that a new kind of bomb–which seems to be a neutron bomb–has been used in Fallujah, but also in other areas, including Lebanon. As though that discovery were not astonishing enough, listening to him, it struck me that this same weapon may have been used to destroy the Twin Towers, an explanation for which has remained elusive and where alternative theories about the possible use of mini-nukes, directed energy weaponry, and other causal mechanisms have been widely discussed–or, in some cases, actually suppressed.

So there are linkages of evidence and causation that tie together the commission of war crimes in Iraq with mechanisms of destruction that may have brought about the near-total conversion of two massive, 500,000 ton buildings into millions of cubic yards of very fine dust.

We know that nanothermite does not have the capacity to bring about these effects, even though it has many staunch advocates. So what we have to learn from Christopher Busby may not only expose the existence of a new weapon of mass destruction but also provide a key to understanding what happened on 9/11. The transcription of the second hour of the program (published here) was done by Jeannon Kralj, to whom we are indebted for the excellence of her work. The images and captions were courtesy of Leuren Moret. I plan to have the first hour published tomorrow and will provide a link to the audio file as soon as it becomes available, which it has just become.

The Real Deal Radio Show (28 October 2011) Host: Jim Fetzer: James Fetzer Ph.D. Guests: Dr. Busby: Christopher Busby, Ph.D. Leuren Moret: Leuren Moret B.S., M.A., PhD (ABD) HOUR TWO (transcribed by Jeannon Kralj)

Link to the rest of this informing article...

http://www.veteranstoday.com/2013/12/06/scientists-insist-iraq-nuked-by-us/

Well worth the reading if you want to know what has been done.

Peace!

Carmody
7th December 2013, 19:19
War machines with incredibly deep research programs will find a way to test their developed weapons. They want to ...and actually demand to test their weapons in live situations. There is no substitute for a live test.

Thus, all kinds of reports about strange weapons, energy weapons of various sorts..these reports came out of Iraq when the US troops arrived on the ground and began the fighting in suburban areas.

This is a time honored 1000's of years deep institution, this live testing. It's been a part of war since war became war, which is 'organized conflict.'

GreenGuy
7th December 2013, 19:30
Does a weapon have to produce a mushroom cloud to be a "nuke?" We spread so-called depleted uranium all over the place. Is that not nuking them?

spiritguide
7th December 2013, 20:34
War machines with incredibly deep research programs will find a way to test their developed weapons. They want to ...and actually demand to test their weapons in live situations. There is no substitute for a live test.

Thus, all kinds of reports about strange weapons, energy weapons of various sorts..these reports came out of Iraq when the US troops arrived on the ground and began the fighting in suburban areas.

This is a time honored 1000's of years deep institution, this live testing. It's been a part of war since war became war, which is 'organized conflict.'

Maybe this is an explanation, but as a purveyor of donated energies (tax dollars), human slaughter of innocents is not what is paid for in relation to defense. There is no excuse for slaughter of humans regardless of color or creed. IMHO

Peace!

donk
9th December 2013, 18:53
Agreed, nice thread...it sucks about the source of the info though...how do y'all discern the lies that Gordon Duff promises us from the "truth" he tries to disseminate? Has he ever said that the VT articles may be disinfo...or just the stuff he actually writes himself?