PDA

View Full Version : Female Sexual Desire Drug Rejected by FDA



Vitalux
19th December 2013, 18:21
I thought this might make some good discussion.
We certainly know men have pills or drugs that can caused an increase in our libido.
Interesting that it was blocked for a woman.



Mod note: Image removed.



A pill to treat low sexual desire in women was rejected by U.S. regulators, a decision that has been appealed by the drug’s maker in a bid to make it the first product for the disorder.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration based its decision to turn down the medicine on what the agency called a modest effect, closely held Sprout Pharmaceuticals Inc. said today in a statement. Sprout, based in Raleigh, North Carolina, is seeking approval of the therapy, known as flibanserin, as an option for women whose low libido causes stress in their lives.

In clinical trials, Sprout’s pill almost doubled the increase women saw in satisfying sexual experiences over a month’s time compared with patients who took a placebo, the company said. The agency’s decision contrasts with its review of drugs to treat male sexual dysfunction, Cindy Whitehead, president and chief operating officer at Sprout, said in an interview. The agency on Dec. 6 issued its 24th approval of a treatment for male sexual dysfunction, an injection called Xiaflex to treat a condition that causes a curved penis.

“I do believe that women deserve a solution to their most common form of sexual dysfunction,” Whitehead said. “Flibanserin has been in 11,000 patients at this point. It’s pretty well defined.”

The FDA accepted Sprout’s appeal on Dec. 3 after turning down the drug about two months ago. Because Sprout isn’t publicly traded, the company didn’t make public when the pill was rejected.

Causes Stress

Flibanserin, if approved, would treat a sexual disorder known as female hypoactive sexual desire disorder, which is low libido that causes stress, according to Sprout. The drug is indicated for use by women who haven’t yet gone through menopause.

“I think this could be a blockbuster drug,” Whitehead said.

Sprout expects to hear FDA’s decision on its appeal in the first quarter of next year.

Treatments for female sexual dysfunction have lagged behind those for men in the 15 years since Pfizer Inc. (PFE)’s Viagra was approved for erectile dysfunction. Treatment for men has since grown into a $4.4 billion market in 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Pfizer gave up studying Viagra for women in 2004. BioSante Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s testosterone gel for women failed to work in two large studies in 2011.

“Women’s sexual health has been really underground,” Sheryl Kingsberg, chief of the Division of Behavioral Medicine at Case Medical Center in Cleveland, said in an interview. “One reason that women’s sexual desire has lagged is desire is in the brain.”

FDA Effort

The FDA identified female sexual dysfunction as one of the conditions the agency has selected as part of an effort to stress the perspective of patients in drug development. The agency plans to hold a meeting with patients in 2014 or 2015, according to the FDA’s website.

Flibanserin is a non-hormonal treatment that, similarly to antidepressants, lowers the level of the chemical serotonin in the brain and boosts dopamine and norepinephrine. Sprout gave the FDA data on 11,000 women in clinical trials, 3,000 of whom were part of new trials. Women in the studies were asked to count the number of satisfying sexual encounters they experienced.

The mean number of satisfying sexual events women on flibanserin recorded in a daily diary increased by 2.5 compared with 1.5 for those who received a placebo over a 28-day period, according to a study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in May.

Fatigue, Sleepiness

Side effects associated with flibanserin include fatigue, nausea and sleepiness.

“I think the patient can assess the benefit to them and talk to their doctor about it,” Whitehead said.

Very few appeals the FDA accepts are granted, including none in 2011 and only three of 17 last year, according to a presentation earlier this year by Amy Bertha in agency’s Office of New Drugs. Regardless, Whitehead said Sprout wants to gain clarity about what is necessary to move forward.

Sprout acquired the rights for flibanserin for an undisclosed amount from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH in 2011 after the FDA told the Ingelheim, Germany-based drugmaker in October 2010 that the treatment hadn’t been proven safe or effective. Sprout said it conducted new tests altering how women’s sexual desire was measured.

Palatin Technologies Inc. (PTN), based in Cranbury, New Jersey, is studying the drug bremelanotide for female sexual dysfunction.

About 43 percent of women experience some sort of sexual dysfunction and one in 10 women have low desire with accompanying distress.

Source (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-11/female-sexual-desire-drug-rejected-by-u-s-regulators.html)

conk
19th December 2013, 18:47
Why the picture of the unfortunate individual?

halffull
19th December 2013, 19:05
I want to ask the same question as Conk

Did it take you a long time to find this picture or were you keeping it for when you could use it in a post?

sheme
19th December 2013, 19:15
Women don't have sexual dysfunction - just some men have sexual ineptitude.

Pavlov's dogs should have pointed the way- Classical conditioning = provide the female of the species with an enjoyable experience and they will want for more- conversely use a female as a toilet for emptying a certain bodily fluid. They will demand pennies in their slot before they cooperate - it is all about action reward remove the reward and you will get no action.

Drugs will not remove the end frustration- desire is one thing -orgasm is another- soon the drugs would fail simply because of the average final outcome. Unfortunately Dick heads rule.

Say No to Stepford wives. http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=nJD8vKov5t0

Crystine
19th December 2013, 19:26
Vitalux! Whatever are you thinking.
Shaking the dust from my sandals. Out of here.

Bubu
19th December 2013, 19:48
Why the picture of the unfortunate individual?

It lowers sexual desire meaning the opposite will do otherwise:eek:

dianna
19th December 2013, 19:59
Women don't have sexual dysfunction - just some men have sexual ineptitude.


LOL Sheme ...

Nanoo Nanoo
19th December 2013, 20:34
Women don't have sexual dysfunction - just some men have sexual ineptitude.

i can see why you are frustrated with men .. its hard being part of a gender that is un accountable , blameless and perfect.

Aaah lol

N

Vitalux
19th December 2013, 21:02
Why the picture of the unfortunate individual?

I put that image in this posting to observe people's reactions.
It is just an image of a female human being.

Had I posted an beautiful woman wearing sexually appealing clothing no one would have complained. We well at least I would have probably achieved less complaints.

The image is just an image. It is our perception that makes her beautiful or "unfortunate".

I'm sorry if for some folks viewing this image, if it causes an emotional reaction. However, I am not responsible for the way you perceive your reality.

Perhaps I see something beautiful in her. Which I most certainly do. I see a part of me.

Inaiá
19th December 2013, 21:07
"Why the picture of the unfortunate individual?" conk

"Vitalux! Whatever are you thinking.
Shaking the dust from my sandals. Out of here." Christine Lori

RunningDeer
19th December 2013, 21:28
The image is just an image. It is our perception that makes her beautiful or "unfortunate".

I'm sorry if for some folks viewing this image, if it causes an emotional reaction. However, I am not responsible for the way you perceive your reality.

Vitalux,

Why the need to add any photo to an article that had none? Manipulating someone’s written material crosses the line. Makes me wonder how many times you've unscrupulously altered threads/posts.

I’ll stop here because you will only turn it around with some gobble-de-gook justification of I mustn’t be as enlightened as you. The game is getting old.

Lastly, and most important, you do a disservice to the Avalonian Family and Guests.

Paula

Vitalux
19th December 2013, 21:43
The image is just an image. It is our perception that makes her beautiful or "unfortunate".

I'm sorry if for some folks viewing this image, if it causes an emotional reaction. However, I am not responsible for the way you perceive your reality.

Vitalux,

Why the need to add any photo to an article that had none? Manipulating someone’s written material crosses the line. Makes me wonder how many times you've unscrupulously altered threads/posts.

I’ll stop here because you will only turn it around with some gobble-de-gook justification of I mustn’t be as enlightened as you. The game is getting old.

Lastly, and most important, you do a disservice to the Avalonian Family and Guests.

Paula

Ok...thanks


I will unsubscribe

RunningDeer
19th December 2013, 21:50
The image is just an image. It is our perception that makes her beautiful or "unfortunate".

I'm sorry if for some folks viewing this image, if it causes an emotional reaction. However, I am not responsible for the way you perceive your reality.

Vitalux,

Why the need to add any photo to an article that had none? Manipulating someone’s written material crosses the line. Makes me wonder how many times you've unscrupulously altered threads/posts.

I’ll stop here because you will only turn it around with some gobble-de-gook justification of I mustn’t be as enlightened as you. The game is getting old.

Lastly, and most important, you do a disservice to the Avalonian Family and Guests.

Paula

Ok...thanks


I will unsubscribe

Thank you, Vitalux. I agree with your decision. It seems that's what you've been working towards these last couple of weeks. Take care of yourself.

Paula

RunningDeer
19th December 2013, 22:00
I thought this might make some good discussion.
We certainly know men have pills or drugs that can caused an increase in our libido.
Interesting that it was blocked for a woman.

A pill to treat low sexual desire in women was rejected by U.S. regulators, a decision that has been appealed by the drug’s maker in a bid to make it the first product for the disorder.

The U.S. Food and Drug Administration based its decision to turn down the medicine on what the agency called a modest effect, closely held Sprout Pharmaceuticals Inc. said today in a statement. Sprout, based in Raleigh, North Carolina, is seeking approval of the therapy, known as flibanserin, as an option for women whose low libido causes stress in their lives.

In clinical trials, Sprout’s pill almost doubled the increase women saw in satisfying sexual experiences over a month’s time compared with patients who took a placebo, the company said. The agency’s decision contrasts with its review of drugs to treat male sexual dysfunction, Cindy Whitehead, president and chief operating officer at Sprout, said in an interview. The agency on Dec. 6 issued its 24th approval of a treatment for male sexual dysfunction, an injection called Xiaflex to treat a condition that causes a curved penis.

“I do believe that women deserve a solution to their most common form of sexual dysfunction,” Whitehead said. “Flibanserin has been in 11,000 patients at this point. It’s pretty well defined.”

The FDA accepted Sprout’s appeal on Dec. 3 after turning down the drug about two months ago. Because Sprout isn’t publicly traded, the company didn’t make public when the pill was rejected.

Causes Stress

Flibanserin, if approved, would treat a sexual disorder known as female hypoactive sexual desire disorder, which is low libido that causes stress, according to Sprout. The drug is indicated for use by women who haven’t yet gone through menopause.

“I think this could be a blockbuster drug,” Whitehead said.

Sprout expects to hear FDA’s decision on its appeal in the first quarter of next year.

Treatments for female sexual dysfunction have lagged behind those for men in the 15 years since Pfizer Inc. (PFE)’s Viagra was approved for erectile dysfunction. Treatment for men has since grown into a $4.4 billion market in 2012, according to data compiled by Bloomberg.

Pfizer gave up studying Viagra for women in 2004. BioSante Pharmaceuticals Inc.’s testosterone gel for women failed to work in two large studies in 2011.

“Women’s sexual health has been really underground,” Sheryl Kingsberg, chief of the Division of Behavioral Medicine at Case Medical Center in Cleveland, said in an interview. “One reason that women’s sexual desire has lagged is desire is in the brain.”

FDA Effort

The FDA identified female sexual dysfunction as one of the conditions the agency has selected as part of an effort to stress the perspective of patients in drug development. The agency plans to hold a meeting with patients in 2014 or 2015, according to the FDA’s website.

Flibanserin is a non-hormonal treatment that, similarly to antidepressants, lowers the level of the chemical serotonin in the brain and boosts dopamine and norepinephrine. Sprout gave the FDA data on 11,000 women in clinical trials, 3,000 of whom were part of new trials. Women in the studies were asked to count the number of satisfying sexual encounters they experienced.

The mean number of satisfying sexual events women on flibanserin recorded in a daily diary increased by 2.5 compared with 1.5 for those who received a placebo over a 28-day period, according to a study published in the Journal of Sexual Medicine in May.

Fatigue, Sleepiness

Side effects associated with flibanserin include fatigue, nausea and sleepiness.

“I think the patient can assess the benefit to them and talk to their doctor about it,” Whitehead said.

Very few appeals the FDA accepts are granted, including none in 2011 and only three of 17 last year, according to a presentation earlier this year by Amy Bertha in agency’s Office of New Drugs. Regardless, Whitehead said Sprout wants to gain clarity about what is necessary to move forward.

Sprout acquired the rights for flibanserin for an undisclosed amount from Boehringer Ingelheim GmbH in 2011 after the FDA told the Ingelheim, Germany-based drugmaker in October 2010 that the treatment hadn’t been proven safe or effective. Sprout said it conducted new tests altering how women’s sexual desire was measured.

Palatin Technologies Inc. (PTN), based in Cranbury, New Jersey, is studying the drug bremelanotide for female sexual dysfunction.

About 43 percent of women experience some sort of sexual dysfunction and one in 10 women have low desire with accompanying distress.

Source (http://www.bloomberg.com/news/2013-12-11/female-sexual-desire-drug-rejected-by-u-s-regulators.html)

Documenting this post.

Nickolai
19th December 2013, 22:03
Ai ai ai!

What is happening here again?
Vitalux and Paula please do not quarrel.


PEACE to you both!!!

PS Vitalux, don't you dare unsubscribe!!!!

Tesla_WTC_Solution
19th December 2013, 22:11
Did you guys really let me miss the drama bus??
My pass says good for all transactions, meaningful or otherwise!!

Anyhow, screw the FDA!
I guess the idea of a woman who is turned on conflicts with the American dream of subservience and stealing.
A talentless lover steals the best years of a woman's life and gives her nothing but risk and ridicule in return.

I see that certain people are considering turning this thread into another gender war.
There's already a war in the middle east, feel free to join that one...

~Been There Done That

p.s. Hope you guys figure it out. I actually appreciate knowing that the FDA has pulled this **** again.
THey seem to be a bunch of dysfunctional granddaughter grabbers who don't like horny women.

RunningDeer
19th December 2013, 22:57
Ai ai ai!

What is happening here again?
Vitalux and Paula please do not quarrel.


PEACE to you both!!!

PS Vitalux, don't you dare unsubscribe!!!!

Hello Nickolai,

Please do not quarrel? He disrespected a human being. It was heartless, cold, and mean spirited. And his justifications thereafter drip with disdain. It creates division on several levels.

Too, when he states “I put that image in this posting to observe people's reactions.” My response to that is...I didn’t join Avalon to be a guinea pig.

”I'm sorry if for some folks viewing this image, if it causes an emotional reaction. However, I am not responsible for the way you perceive your reality.”

It’s a total set up. BS on steroids. He’s sorry if it causes emotional reactions, but he’s not responsible for our perceptions. That’s the "I'm sorry/but" game.

Paula

ThePythonicCow
19th December 2013, 23:19
Ok...thanks


I will unsubscribe

Ok .

Nickolai
19th December 2013, 23:25
Paula,

I suppose since I have not been here as often as I used to be and as you mentioned earlier there was something between two of you for the two weeks time period then i miss something. But no matter what my opinion is that you are overreacting here. Why not let go?
I repeat that many people left the forum already. Why push the person out?

I know that you are very kind person and you always brought peace where it was needed. So what is going on here really?

As I said before, Peace,

Nickolai

Hervé
19th December 2013, 23:39
Ok...thanks


I will unsubscribe

Ok .

Paul's definitely the fastest sharp shooter in the Whole Wild West Webb... and Texas!

All right, now I can have my fries! (Sorry for the inside joke folks)

ThePythonicCow
19th December 2013, 23:43
I know that you are very kind person and you always brought peace where it was needed. So what is going on here really?
This is not just Paula's doing.

The Moderation Team stands with her, 100%.

And it is not just the present thread ... there is a long history here.

karelia
19th December 2013, 23:44
Now that the OP has left of his own accord, I suggest we turn our attention to important matters. Like, you know, returning joy and love to this planet.

Thread closed.