US imperialism and the Middle East.

[bogeyman]

"...of course, the people don't want war. Why would some poor slob on a farm want to risk his life in a war when the best that he can get out of it is to come back to his farm in one piece? Naturally, the common people don't want war; neither in Russia nor in England nor in America, nor for that matter in Germany. That is understood. But, after all, it is the leaders of the country who determine the policy and it is always a simple matter to drag the people along, whether it is a democracy or a fascist dictatorship or a Parliament or a Communist dictatorship."


"...the people can always be brought to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country."

Hermann Göring

With the US interventions in Iraq, Afghanistan, Libya, Egypt, and Syria (to some degree), it seems the out come is an increase in the foot hold of Al Qaeda. It seems all rather suspicious, since the fall of the communist threat and the irregularities in the events of 9/11. Saddam Hussein for example was fighting a growing terrorist threat and providing the western powers with important intelligence, and the US constant insistent and manipulation of the UN security Council to invade Iraq, seems to indicate a deliberate policy at the heart of the US administration to justify another conflict, knowing that a back lash would occur in the middle east eventually.

Also I'm sure they knew an increase in the terrorist threat would occur. Fear is a weapon and the freedoms of the people can slowly be eroded away, as a result of a self generated threat.

[S-L]

According to the Allies of Humanity (http://www.alliesofhumanity.org/), certain leaders of the United States are being manipulated by a group of ETs. The real reason behind the wars in Afghanistan and Iraq are to weaken the United States economically and militarily. Weakening the strongest nations on our planet makes it easier for them to intervene into human affairs:


“The Briefings state that the Intervention is promoting human conflict. How does it do this? Can you give us an example of what you have seen so far?”

You have but to promote religious extremism and nationalism and to convince the leaders and persuasive individuals that other peoples represent their enemy and a threat. You have only to project the images of spiritual saints and emissaries proclaiming the need to overcome adversaries. This is how the Intervention can promote conflict in the world. The United States’ engagement and its war in the nation of Iraq is a very good example of leaders being persuaded to do something that is utterly foolish, to engage in an intractable conflict with no certain outcome, committing so much of its resources, even risking world opinion to engage in this manner. Other nations, particularly nations that are powerful and influential, will be engaged in this way through persuasion by the Intervention—to diminish their power, to diminish their influence, to diminish the morale of their own peoples and to diminish their economies. For the Intervention needs humanity to decline in order to present itself as truly beneficial to human destiny. Therefore, the Intervention will seek to weaken the strongest powers to degrade their influence in the world and to create an overall situation where the Intervention will be deemed truly valuable, and its counsel and its guidance will be attended to and followed.