Santos Bonacci Arrested and in Custody

[SilentFeathers]

I wonder if this is true (sounds to be)

2vHddDxcAgA

[chocolate]

http://www.disclose.tv/forum/breaking-santos-bonacci-arrested-t90648.html that is what I found, but if this is true or a bogus I don't know

it is shown in the video as well.
on my FB page the last thing posted by Santos was on Jan 5.

[AlaBil]

It certainly looks to be true to me. Here is his Facebook page and there is information all over the top of the page about this incident.

https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci

[alh02]

Unfortunately, this story is 100% true.

I have spoken with people from Santos' inner circle who have confirmed it to me directly.

From what I was told, action is being undertaken this morning to try and remedy the situation.

I will post an update later if/when more information about what's happening comes to me.

[GK76]

He'll be fine, this is just the system letting their dogs loose, and as usual operating way beyond lawful boundaries they claim to uphold. The legal jurisdiction is a blight on humanity and is based purely on fraud, Santos knows this and has them worried, this is their way of trying to scare him and others away from knowing the truth. The game is now one step closer to unmasking the legal juris-fiction and the criminals who hide behind the BAR association and Crown corporation. The last place they'll want him is in court, he'll either send the judge scampering away or we'll see the depth of corruption of the courts where even they don't play by the official rules.

Did anyone notice the numbers on the seven day notice on gnosticwarrior.com? (add the numbers)

132251.10 = 6
483 = 6
9114 = 6

The message is pretty clear don't you think? ;)

[naste.de.lumina]

Excuse the ignorance friends.
But I still can not understand what the prosecution to arrest him.
Could someone enlighten me?
Thank you.
Naste.

[Mad Hatter]

Update -

Rob Halford (LS) is now on the case. The process to get him out may see Santos cooling his heels for a minimum 72 hours though so his family may not get to see him until next Monday.

As a side note I know of at least two people who IMO 'know' better having advised him the legal info he was relying on would get him into trouble. Seems you can lead a horse to water...

Will update further as info comes to hand.

cheers

POST EDITED

There ya go grip post edited to bring it into line with what I perceive as a fair dose of 'straight laced' that appears to have flushed through PA since I was last here...:cool:

[gripreaper]

The process to get him out may see Santos cooling his heels for a minimum 72 hours

Typically they can hold you for 72 hours and then you must be arraigned, which means you go before a magistrate and enter a plea. Santos will most likely never enter a plea or sign any document indicating any intention to create joinder with the corrupt system.


As a side note I know of at least two people who 'know' better having advised him the legal info he was relying on provided by a particular 'wannabe nutless wonder' barfing bad info all across the web would get him into trouble.

I'm not sure who you are referring to here, but this statement is 'ad hominem' and does not site any relevant information for anyone to make an assessment as to the veracity of your statement. Santos is "right on" about what he teaches, and I see no fallacious areas in who he has been aligning himself with or what he stands for.

As a matter of fact, Santos is one of the most well researched and he understands how things really work better than almost all of those whom I have studied in the last ten years. He is impeccable.

How he handles this will certainly be interesting, but I wouldn't count him out yet for not paying a fine or aligning himself with others of like mind.

[update]
The suggestion of "throwing donated money and lawyers" at the problem as suggested by the video, is not the answer.

[onawah]

We can certainly throw some good energetic support his way, in any event....

[Ellisa]

I do not know who Santos Bonacci is, but I do know that the statements in the video are very muddled. If he has been arrested in the state of Queensland he must have had an extradition order of some kind because Melbourne, also mentioned, is in the state of Victoria, a completely separate state, and each has their own legal system. Also the Sheriff in Australia is not police, but a civil position, like a magistrate. It seems likely that he has committed some civil offence and been fined, and unfortunately for him Queensland at the moment is having a huge crackdown on offenders and locking people up for talking to each other, let alone ignoring legally (I assume) imposed fines.

It sounds as though he has a mess to sort out, and he may be able to pay the fines, though if he ignored the warnings he may have to go to court. If the sheriff's department (or the bailiffs) need to interview a suspected offender they will have to call the police to take the person into custody. To do so may require those police to enter a property, which of course is regular behaviour for police, and really not kidnapping.

It does seem, from the outside looking in, that this guy's only option is to hope he is allowed to pay what seems to be an overdue penalty.

[chocolate]

He'll be fine, this is just the system letting their dogs loose, and as usual operating way beyond lawful boundaries they claim to uphold. The legal jurisdiction is a blight on humanity and is based purely on fraud, Santos knows this and has them worried, this is their way of trying to scare him and others away from knowing the truth. The game is now one step closer to unmasking the legal juris-fiction and the criminals who hide behind the BAR association and Crown corporation. The last place they'll want him is in court, he'll either send the judge scampering away or we'll see the depth of corruption of the courts where even they don't play by the official rules.

Did anyone notice the numbers on the seven day notice on gnosticwarrior.com? (add the numbers)

132251.10 = 6
483 = 6
9114 = 6

The message is pretty clear don't you think? ;)

I was, but couldn't figure out where the comma was...:) That on itself prevented me from your calculations.
Hope Santos will be released soon for good.

[GK76]

Yup, the video and write-up is a mess. The Sheriff is probably sitting by clueless and powerless as always where the legal system is involved, he should have acted as soon as Santos claimed common law jurisdiction, then removed the offending articles (police/bailiffs) from the grounds. Santos also knows to enforce his will by denying the legal system's assumption/presumption tricks, after all the only way to get a legal name from someone is by assuming/presuming or forcibly by planting ID (as sovereign he won't have any ID pointing to a legal name). Therefore they are kidnapping a sovereign, not arresting a subject/citizen as they will falsely claim.

This is an arrest by the legal system for their own profit, hence the over due fine. That's pretty much all the legal system does, steal money, milk bonds, and entice into fraud and slavery... as well as create and enforce mindless by-laws/statues for idiots to accept unquestioningly. Let's face it, if I created a by-law/statute off my own back and force you to pay a fine when you breach it would you consider that acceptable? Welcome to the legal system.

Santos is a sovereign, he'll stand in common law and natural law (where applicable) but avoid the grasping hands of those thieves from the crown corporation. That's pretty much the legal system... corporate criminals operating within their own invented system. They only have power if you don't know who you are. Granted they'll push their luck with all sorts of tricks and police 'force', but that's because they are protecting their racket, you'd expect the same reaction form the mafia.

I guarantee this fine won't be paid. After all it's not he who needs to pay it, the dead-entity-corporate-legal-fiction name those criminals created after his birth is liable... not the living entity. He'll walk after giving them a good hard kick in the unmentionables, he just needs a hearing and to keep his wits about him amongst the nest of vipers. What you see here is nothing more than kidnapping along with intent to aid and abet fraud, all of which the poor idiot thug police and judge will have to answer for... since the Apostolic letter of 11-July-13 rescinded their immunity from prosecution (the only decent thing a Pope has ever done).

Santos Bonacci and co know their stuff, none of that "moo-moo, baa-baa" crap we get from the sleepers. :)





As a side note I know of at least two people who 'know' better having advised him the legal info he was relying on provided by a particular 'wannabe nutless wonder' barfing bad info all across the web would get him into trouble. Seems you can lead a horse to water...


Please name this "wannabe nutless wonder" as you seemed to have omitted it. Present your claim to him/her as a responsible adult would, I'm sure he/she would value your input. :)




I was, but couldn't figure out where the comma was...:) That on itself prevented me from your calculations.
Hope Santos will be released soon for good.

There was no comma, I merely added the full stop to show the fact the number came from a monetary value, the original used a hyphen, either way it's of no matter - just add the numbers. I simply added that piece for those who would appreciate the often hidden aspects of this strange creation of ours. :)

1+3+2+2+5+1+1+0 = 15
1+5 = 6

Nature uses the simplest forms which we overlook through arrogance. :)

[Sunny-side-up]

I do not know who Santos Bonacci is, but I do know that the statements in the video are very muddled. If he has been arrested in the state of Queensland he must have had an extradition order of some kind because Melbourne, also mentioned, is in the state of Victoria, a completely separate state, and each has their own legal system. Also the Sheriff in Australia is not police, but a civil position, like a magistrate. It seems likely that he has committed some civil offence and been fined, and unfortunately for him Queensland at the moment is having a huge crackdown on offenders and locking people up for talking to each other, let alone ignoring legally (I assume) imposed fines.

It sounds as though he has a mess to sort out, and he may be able to pay the fines, though if he ignored the warnings he may have to go to court. If the sheriff's department (or the bailiffs) need to interview a suspected offender they will have to call the police to take the person into custody. To do so may require those police to enter a property, which of course is regular behaviour for police, and really not kidnapping.

It does seem, from the outside looking in, that this guy's only option is to hope he is allowed to pay what seems to be an overdue
penalty.

Hi Ellisa

Lawful Awakening: Sin and Salvation. Santos Bonacci Part One

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BObrQGUtjkw

Lawful Awakening: Sin and Salvation. Santos Bonacci Part Two

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xUDWhXuFo2Y

If you haven't seen these two vids by the great man well! you simply must.
You will learn about the law, your body, the rising of your Salt, and the Arch of the covenant, your sacred body and a whole load of history that will really make you mad or just blown!.

[Kimberley]

WOW Santos is a freind of mine.

You can hear what went down from Sonia his sister inlaw (i think she is his sister inlaw) on this Blog Talk Radio show that was done on Monday.

go to the 86:30 minute mark

http://www.blogtalkradio.com/criticalmassradioonline/2014/01/21/outside-the-box-open-forum-with-kate-of-gaia


I am digging around to find out what happened.

[Ellisa]

The fact that this man has some great ideas and insights is not worth much if he has acted unlawfully. Unfortunately we are bound by law to behave in a certain way and should we not do so we may incur penalties. This is our own choice, but we should probably not be too surprised when we are charged by the people representing the Government, who, after all, in a democracy act on our behalf as our elected representatives.

Of course many do not agree with this, and are anarchists and revolutionaries. That is up to them, but the easiest way for Mr Bonacci to extract himself from this mess may be to negotiate to pay the fines, or decide to make the protest and go to jail for the sake of making a personal point--- thus becoming a martyr for what he sees as the truth.

By the way-- is this happening in Victoria or Queensland? Good luck to him if it's Queensland!

[WhiteFeather]

I have never heard of Santos till this thread :o. However i have listened to some of his Astrotheology videos and i am ultimately impressed with his intelligence of the universe. I am in Awe. Im sure the universe will pay great respect to this inspiring human being.

As my energy is focused on your release from custody forthwith Santos. Asquali my Kola. Godspeed to you.

We are all connected.....

W.f.

[naste.de.lumina]

http://bonaccithefilm.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/04/syncretism.jpg

http://bonaccithefilm.com/?page_id=139

Bonacci along with Johnny Guzman: http://www.qltelevision.com/ were finalizing an important film / documentary.

We need to support him morally at least.


Fj6jFLr4eaU

Recorded in in May 2013

Quantum Leap TV presents Syncretism The Science of Light in Vilcabamba Ecuador... Join host Johnny Guzman and special guest Santos Bonacci, Keung Man and Daren Clayton... In This interview Johnny and Santos are in beautiful Vilcabamba Ecuador recording for the film "Syncretism".... Please visit our web page: www.bonaccithefilm.com and help us with your donations... For all of our previous shows subscribe to our YouTube Channel: QL Television...

[Kimberley]

How interesting Whitefeather my friend that you were not aware of my good friend Santos until now. He is a fabulous man with such great insight of the real deal of how life has been playing out.

You can spend many hours listening to his lectures at his youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/MrAstrotheology

you will love Santos's knowledge for sure!

He is a very knowledgeable man that you will love for sure!!!


Enjoy! Much love to us all :grouphug:




I have never heard of Santos till this thread :o. However i have listened to some of his Astrotheology videos and i am ultimately impressed with his intelligence of the universe. I am in Awe. Im sure the universe will pay great respect to this inspiring human being.

As my energy is focused on your release from custody forthwith Santos. Asquali my Kola. Godspeed to you.

We are all connected.....

W.f.

[gripreaper]

The fact that this man has some great ideas and insights is not worth much if he has acted unlawfully. Unfortunately we are bound by law to behave in a certain way and should we not do so we may incur penalties. This is our own choice, but we should probably not be too surprised when we are charged by the people representing the Government, who, after all, in a democracy act on our behalf as our elected representatives.

Ellisa, there is a difference between lawful and legal, between de jure and de facto, between representative government and government corporatocracy. There is also ample evidence here at Avalon which shows there is NO SUCH THING as lawful jurisprudence or representative government.


Of course many do not agree with this, and are anarchists and revolutionaries.

There are other choices besides anarchy or revolution. Santos has nowhere EVER endorsed anarchy OR revolution, so this statement is not fair at all.


The easiest way for Mr Bonacci to extract himself from this mess may be to negotiate to pay the fines

This would be the absolute worst possible thing to do, to create joinder with corporate mercenaries who treat all sentient beings as property, to extract energy from in the form of corporate bonds for their own aggrandizement. The easiest way is most often not the best way.


or decide to make the protest and go to jail for the sake of making a personal point--- thus becoming a martyr for what he sees as the truth.

This is not at all what this is about, to protest or become a martyr. To stand in your power and rebut the presumptive corporate bond and the commercial admiralty is not protest, but being who you are and standing in your truth.

Acquiescing to corporatocracy and the commercial admiralty would be the WORST thing to do.

I don't mean to make an example out of you Ellisa, but it is this very attitude and this very point of view which is at the core of what ails us as a species. We need to stand against the controlling elite and their commercial system of extraction of our energy for their own personal hedonistic aggrandizement and take back our power.

Please avail yourself of the massive amounts of research in this area and I'm sure you will agree.

[Operator]

The easiest way for Mr Bonacci to extract himself from this mess may be to negotiate to pay the fines

This would be the absolute worst possible thing to do, to create joinder with corporate mercenaries who treat all sentient beings as property, to extract energy from in the form of corporate bonds for their own aggrandizement. The easiest way is most often not the best way.


Indeed, Santos is besides knowledgeable in Astro-Theology also an active combatant for individual sovereignty.
We can safely assume that making a deal with them is not on his mind.

[MargueriteBee]

I have to say I unfollowed Santos on FB due to all the swearing...... He was real mad at someone, I forget.

[Ellisa]

Whilst it is true that Santos is a clever and original thinker with an intellectual brilliance of the first order I personally think that he embodies the saying--- Common sense is not so common. In this instance common sense would indicate that he pay his fine. He, with his own sovereignty first in his mind, will not see the sensible course and will argue that his own welbeing and comfort will not allow him to comply. This may be an heroic action, but it is not a sensible one

Heroes often are not sensible, and his actions are his to control. I am not religious at all, but the wise carpenter of Galilee advised rendering to Cesar what is Cesar's. It seems an odd point for Santos make a stand about.

[Gardener]

I hear you on that MB, I noticed, and it was a little uncharacteristic. I understand he has been under quite a bit of attack on a few fronts, not surprising really. He has also deleted a lot of abusive followers I don't let it influence the message though, heck diving into the whole astrotheology stuff has really helped me understand a lot of things, particularly the language, word co-option. I have followed up on some of his recommended reading too, as he always says 'this information is not his', he is just passing it on. Awesome stuff, his knowledge of the written words of the bible (chapter and verse lol) from his time as a JW, and his command of several languages.
The guy he was mad at was the guy who took possesion of Jordan Maxwell's web site and is now getting revenues from Jordans work, so I guess Santos' passion for truth is behind the degree of anger. Plus he is working with Kate of Gaia and s/he doesn't hold anything back. :)


I have to say I unfollowed Santos on FB due to all the swearing...... He was real mad at someone, I forget.

[Mitm]

Guys, all the freeman stuff might be true according to their laws, their system, but they will even break them to get who they want, they did this to Arthur Cristian, and they have done it to Santos, the only one offering a remedy is Arthur, and his answer is to leave the system, he has done this himself, and even now the SDRO is trying to get him to pay back some minor fines, in installment... but he doesnt exist officially anymore, he has recinded (sic) everything, birth certificate, licence, everything...... per Arthur his remedy is to leave the system and let it crumble, only thinking, feeling, sensing what is real...ie nature, other people, etc... As per Anastasia, she sees using the system itself to create the change to paradise, ie the soon to be implemented Russian Ancestral Estates law, free land, etc, etc....

[gripreaper]

Ellisa, you did not say anything different than your post#15, although it had less descriptive adjectives. This is how I read this with a few additional descriptive adjectives.

We are slaves, so we might as well get used to it. It’s stupid and not common sense, to recognize you are a slave and try to leave the plantation. It is much better to “go along to get along” because that is easier and more comfortable, and what good will it do to go against such a gargantuan system anyway? After all, the statutes and regulations are there for a reason, so why complain? Just be a good little sensible slave and do your job, pay the fines, get the licenses, pay the insurance, pay the taxes, pay the fees, pay the registrations, pay the permits, pay the interest, and take what little time you have left after “rendering unto Caesar” and enjoy your life. Where is your common sense?

Be sure and fill in all the forms, sign them and send them in.

It all belongs to the Vatican and the Crown anyway, so why try to change it? Santos, as a brilliant and original thinker, should just suck it up and get on with compliance to the corrupt system no matter how corrupt it gets, we should just “go along” as that is common sense. You should follow all the rules, the statutes, the regulations, the codes, the ordinances, of any and all government agencies as it is the right thing to do. That is common sense.

http://desmond.imageshack.us/Himg62/scaled.php?server=62&filename=disappointment.gif&res=landing

[jackovesk]

The (Real Question) is...

What did he (DO) to incur a $132,251.10 (Fine)...:confused:

http://gnosticwarrior.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Santos-image-2.jpg

http://gnosticwarrior.com/santos-bonacci-arrested-and-in-custody.html

PS - Until this can be honestly addressed, there is (NO) point in pointing Fingers or Jumping to Conclusions..!

[gripreaper]

OK, I will try and refrain from any further comment until the facts are in. In the meantime, here is some light reading to get ready for the truth to come out. This is from a post sigma6 did and I think it is appropriate.


EXPRESSING THE TRUST
– The Holy Grail of Control, or the Hidden System of Control.


ROMAN SYSTEM - Not necessarily bad, (or good for that matter, we must be more pragmatic, analytical to see what is going on...) it is a control system, and some one knows how to use it, and kept it secret from the rest of us... "Just-Is" "Just-us" But they are fighting to install this system all over the planet...

What no one is getting is the whole key to taking back our power is LEARNING the power of the remedy that was put in the hand of every man and woman who lives in a country that operates a fiat currency and registered the event of the parent "giving" their child a NAME. That event was registered, the documents held and reified (search "reification") into a security, the value derived from an actuarial value of the lifetime of labour of the corresponding living human being. Bonds were then issued and the money was "borrowed" from the banks, thus why all money is debt in this Bankruptcy Model of Economics. And this, in a nutshell is why and what makes us the Creditors, it our energy the corporations are borrowing, OUR "MONEY" (that's another VERY important story...) Anyhow, another aspect of this security is that it becomes part of an 'Estate', or Master Account, upon which all property and accounts are opened and attached to by chain of title. Two separate entities... the birth of a flesh and blood living soul, and the "birth" of a PERSON, sole corporation, Master account... Because it is a form of title (by definition) It is a property, a thing. In trust it is the "res".

The Birth Certificate should be read as DOE, JOHN, Estate.
Now... since they are holding the title to this property. But, it was INTENDED for you (since your mom INTENDED to give you that NAME...) (start getting in your head this NAME is a BIG deal. It's the Title (right to everything in that NAME man!) Drivers License - created from the BC, SSN - created from the BC... that is what I mean by chain of title... All title ultimately goes back to the Certificate (itself is only a token) that references the original signature document which evidences the Title. The BC has been specifically called a “valuable token” And they hold all the original signature documents (The Titles).

I should add for clarity, Title is right to something, if you have a whole complete Title to something, only God can take it away from you... literally, legally, equitably and morally. Conversely this is why cops and judges and government are crawling up your butt to scrape whatever they can find and steal it from you. They know you don't have the title to ANYTHING... So where is our remedy? We have to have a remedy, that is universal principle, especially if they want to be holding our title. That is the crucial understanding, that changes from "They are screwing us..." (and they are...) to "How do we get our power back? how did we lose control?..."

Think of the implications of this. If they are holding the titles to all the NAMEs, then by chain of title they are holding title to EVERYTHING!!! That it is also why you are listed as a tenant on your mortgage or "Deed of Transfer" for example (but that's another story...)

Therefore there is only ONE way to interpret this, it has to be a trust interpretation.

Maxim of Equity: "Equity looks to the intent rather than the form" Thus why we don't lose our superior interest just because another is holding property intended for us. This is why it is called equitable title. A trust means (in this example) Property is given to a "holder" (someone you "trust") and the Title is split in two parts by definition… (like a rental agreement for example, i.e it’s NOT a complete transferring over… ) One part is a legal title, the other is an equitable title. Again by definition equitable title is superior, thus equitable title IS superior interest. That is why we have superior interest to the legal title that the State is holding! Unlike the rental example, its not conveyed for their use but for its SAFEKEEPING. (Trust)

Thus this entire event, dynamic and incontrovertible legal, lawful and "roughed in" trust interpretation (waiting to be "manifested" or "realized") inevitably follow, are all 'baked into' that document (BC = valuable token) So powerful and important, it's the reason why they hold it... (among other reasons not just our benefit, (as will be explained below))

And if you don't think Equity trumps common law, there are many hints:

(Courts of Justice Act - R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.43)

COMMON LAW AND EQUITY
Rules of law and equity: (R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 96 (1); 1993, c. 27, Sched.)
96. (1) Courts shall administer concurrently all rules of equity and the common law.

Rules of equity to prevail:
96. (2) Where a rule of equity conflicts with a rule of the common law, the rule of equity prevails.

Thus they are holding something that belongs to you... Thus they hold legal title, and therefore are the "statutory legal" property owner. That's why they like to pretend Statutory is the be all end all (it AIN'T, not by a long shot...) Natural Law is, Trust is, Equity is... Anyhow, you are the principal. You are the party with superior interest by definition. These words are CRITICAL. Claiming ownership to the NAME is lethal on both counts... both legally and a breach of the trust (as we step into the world of trust...like Alice through the Looking Glass) you can only claim your "superior interest". They undoubtedly have a huge obligation in holding it, but none the less, you can't claim title to the property (or any property if you think about it!!) You can only claim interest. If you understand this, you have 51% of all the understanding required and should be highly excited and motivated to want to learn more (haha)

One more time...

When one party is holding something that belongs to another...
And there is indisputable, incontrovertible, unequivocal proof of this (and you have that... it’s called a "Birth Certificate" Think of it as "proof of receipt" (thus why they make such a big deal in getting it to you when you want one... because it's an absolute trustee requirement in order for them to justify HOLDING your property in the first place!) Now then, the party that is holding what is rightfully yours has a "trustee" obligation. BIG TIME.

Another way to look at this. “IF” you had ever considered setting up a trust. One of the requirements would be to give the "Title" to the party that you are going to designate as the "Trustee"!!! And in turn you would require some "paperwork" in order to prove this arrangement. After that though, the trustee is YOUR FIDUCIARY in ALL matters pertaining to what they are holding!

So the government actually laid it out exactly in this fashion, just didn't bother to tell or educate the "little people" Now if no one shows up to make claim of interest, (I prefer NOTICE of Interest) to this trust (which most nobody has) then they would be forced to step in to maintain the trust (principle of trust law - a trust can't fail for lack of a trustee) but when they step in, they have declared themselves as Guardians with POA over it... tadaa... (don't you feel safer already?... hmm....)

And well, well, well what do you know?!... Isn't this exactly what the government (the State or Province) has done in fact! Now here's another aspect (or trick) It isn't exactly a trust yet. It is only POTENTIALLY one, All the pieces are there. (it’s a property of trust interpretation...) I know it sounds waffly, but it is and it isn’t. It’s more like a potential. It isn't a trust yet, in one sense, because you have NOT stepped up to the plate and "manifested your intention" to make it so. Now if you try to "claim" without clarifying exactly what you clearly mean, it might be a mistake, because it sounds like you are trying to claim property! But you don't have Title remember?! Point is, if you don't clearly understand this, they have a hundred ways to trip you up... You must claim superior interest! You must "EXPRESS" the trust! (before they try to create a constructive or resulting trust... and if they do, then you are sunk!) That’s right. The act of manifesting your intention, via instructions, a will, or "recognizing" (a form of contracting) that they are holding something that was intended for you. (notice that is the NOT the same thing as saying it is your property... think on that one...)

Understand this incredible dynamic, Understand the nature of your relationship to the NAME and what it actually really is... One of the things you must learn very clearly is what the difference between an EXPRESSED trust is vs a RESULTING or CONSTRUCTIVE trust.

An expressed trust will rebut any resulting or constructive trust. Which is why one possible way to do this is to make sure, one way or another, that the Birth Certificate is entered into the record of any court proceeding, and definitely, preferably, before any trial even starts. A4Ved, (Accepted for Value, it's an offer of indemnification in fact...) Along with instruction for settlement. (known as a Trust “indenture”) I believe the BC can be "presented" in court, and know of occasions where it has been FORMALLY presented in court. But… there is a private aspect to all this. And the offer to settle (trust instructions = indenture) must be referred to, or delivered to the Judge as "private" or "in the private" (i.e. outside of the public statutory... two separate things... and equity (trust interpretation) trumps statutory law, hands down, if you can get past their gauntlet.

Thus why they say we shouldn't even be physically going into the courts because if you submit the paperwork properly, they know they are left holding the bag. Your arrival would only be one last attempt to attach liability to you and by definition it is considered a form of presumption of jurisdiction. (i.e. just showing up is deemed presumption of jurisdiction. You are agreeing to go to Johnny’s house to play "monopoly". Remember Presumptions are "designed" to be rebutted, it's exactly like an "automatic setting" in a computer system. So that is not the problem. The problem is IDENTIFYING what it is they are PRESUMING! In order to let them know you are rebutting it!!! They will try to attach surety to you. Most people will get sucked in, in 2 minutes... Whereas if the ONLY evidence is the BC, (possibly both the long form and the short form = 2 witnesses) And it can only have one interpretation in court. They will dismiss, discharge, withdraw, etc, etc. We have seen this... I have a report from someone who did go in and ignored them when they called "the" NAME out 3 times. And they dismissed it.

So I know this is fundamentally correct. Just how to fit it into their rules of civil procedure is another question. After all the trick here is you are trying to deliver what is a "private trust settlement" into a public statutory probate court. Thus all their shenanigans, and 'acting' like they don't know. Do not be fooled. The only thing that would make sense is to do what is known as “invoke a court of equity” or deliver these docs (BC and possibly the long form as well), the acceptance (A4V signed for: signature, in trust), and instructions (indenture) beforehand to the Judge in "private" (since he is the only actor that can go into the private)

Thus the concept that CW's group is still trying to suss out... all the methods of invoking equity. For example one way I was told was to motion for a court of competent jurisdiction. (like a court of equity for example?)

This is all in alignment with one of the most universal maxims (indisputable truths) that “Whoever creates the liability must provide the remedy…” (mind you I am still looking for the source, Book, or manual... that is how "hidden" it must be...)

Regardless, this applies especially to us because we are all operating in a bankruptcy. That means they took away our ability to pay with real money. Even V the "guerrilla economist" in one of these threads, acknowledges this... A bankruptcy involves "trustees" (which means there's a trust....) And they DID give us the remedy!!. It's in your drawer! (or desk!) I don't care how secretive, "complicated" or labyrinthine it is, This IS what WE ALL NEED to learn.

EVERY ISSUE is NOW ONLY ONE ISSUE.
Correcting their statutory presumption of LIABILITY. PERIOD!!!
(do NOT go into their jurisdiction, or abandon all hope...)

And then acting "honourably" by presenting the Certificate of your indisputable proof of equitable interest. Your full faith and Credit in essence. What they have borrowed against and created bonds against (Gee do you think they are OWING you anything?????) With instruction (permission) to allow them to settle THEIR LIABILITY in the public. Thus we are using our equitable interest, our Faith and Credit, for the BENEFIT of the public.

The BC NAME you are holding is now their property (by virtue of holding legal title to the "thing" "res" original ink paperwork recording the gifting/giving of the "given name" from your mother to you. The piece of paper you hold is evidence of a legal property, that although it is correlated with the given name it is not that itself, it's a certificate. It's a legal entity, a property in it's own right. And it is government public property. And they again are holding title to that as well. But none the less, it is derived from the given NAME. (so technically the trust interpretation may be more complicated then I think, although the fundamentals are still sound re: superior interest=equitable title. And of course the problem is it is hard to find a way to exercise that without understanding trust interpretation!!

(Note: at this stage I don't want to get too much more into the actual application, but there is some clear and definite indications that we may need to include the SSN/SIN... because they need it to process the "public side" while they are doing the private settlement... but this is still in the research stage and only one interpretation)

This IS the solution to taking back our control. If you understand the power of a trust and the obligation of a trustee. Then you would understand why, even if it takes a few months, or a year, or 5 years, or 10 years... This is the point where your life changes. Where we become freed from the “SLAVERY” of their “GUARDIANSHIP” (POA over the CHILD named on the BC) Did you let that stop you from learning how to use a computer? (ok I know that may hurt for some... lol) but that is what we are dealing with... a system...


http://www.irs.gov/irm/part21/irm_21-007-013r.html
see IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2

2nd bullet under section 2:
An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici92.pdf (s6 - 130813)
IRC-7701 – General Discussion - 1992

definition of person: (pg. 2)
IRC 7701(a)(1) does not refer to "person" in the usual sense of a living human being. Rather, Reg. 301.7701-1(a) instructs that the term "person" includes an individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate, joint-stock company, association, syndicate, group, pool, joint venture or other unincorporated organization or group, guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.

D: Trust (pg. 7)
A working definition of "trust" is provided in Reg. 301.7701-4. The term "trust" as used in the Code refers to an arrangement created either by a will or by an inter vivos declaration whereby trustees take title to property for the purpose of protecting or conserving it for the beneficiaries under the ordinary rules applied in chancery or probate courts.

I highlighted “person” and “trust” it actually makes reference to "chancery" OR "probate" courts....

And we are the operators (or should be)... And they are the "ghosts" in the machine. Our house servants know how to run and manage the house (Estate) better then we do, and now they have tied us to the bed in the cellar, and are living the life of Reilly… under the guise that it is all for our benefit.

The fact is, they are NOT necessarily holding it completely for our benefit, it can most definitely be interpreted and justly so that they are holding it FOR THEIR BENEFIT. When you release any claim to property (all you need is superior interest…) You can identify the NAME (which is really the public… as per the Criminal Code definition of “any one”, “person” and “owner” or similar expressions, include Her Majesty, and an organization; (Public Corporations)

I am telling you this system is there. And the only way to understand it is to start taking the first steps to learning the fundamental principles of trust. What it is, how it operates, why it operates (very philosophical in fact...) In one sense it is the melding of the principles of law and morality. Think about it... trust. duty. obligation. Rights.

Statutory law is on the surface, a mishmash of commerce, admiralty, trust criminal, whatever (all mumbo jumbo to me) All superimposed over a bedrock that is ultimately trust. The language of the elite...

Don't believe this? Find it hard to fathom? I can't blame you, that's because you have nothing to reference it against... But consider this article, right in the mainstream, right under everyone's noses. Here is an example I came across... just by luck I was listening to an audio on the subject and caught it…
In fact it may be a useful tool for us... a tool of delivery of things from private to the public.


REAL WORLD EXAMPLE

Nigella Lawson’s ex reportedly threatened to commit suicide in an attempt to win back celebrity chef
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/08...paper-reports/

It makes reference to a “decree nisi”... (this is a clear reference to a trust interpretation and process)

091007 – MB&T.NTT – Debut NTT – 02.mp3
http://www.4shared.com/mp3/KxwzkQ3S/...ut_NTT_-_.html
In this Christian Walters audio, they start talking about it at around 60 minutes (I would start there at any rate)

In a nutshell what they are saying it is, is fascinating to say the least. It points up a couple of 'undeniables' Trust law is alive and well. And ‘rich’ people seem to know what it is... Consider, what kind of lawyer, (assuming he didn't represent himself) would have come up with this? (not a criminal lawyer...) Not that it helped him win, but it was incredibly odd that he was still able to remain in contact with her... and overcome the typical court orders... (that they automatically (by presumption) dump on us plebs...)

In a nutshell a decree nisi is described somewhat like this, but it is better you listen to the audio, to capture the spontaneity of the conversation
nisi decree: Start listening at approx 1:00:00 (is where it’s worth listening to)

interim decree from court (which is really you) not the judge
it’s purpose is to deliver something from the private side to the public side
and can be followed up with a notice of acceptance and default (or similar)

in this case it’s applied to a private settlement for example
- since it is interim, it doesn’t become absolute until the other party
fails to show why they shouldn’t have to follow it
- then it is absolute , unconditional, it stands so once this becomes absolute, you put in a show order against the decree the court (you) demanded

Now they have to follow AND they will automatically be in contempt as well...
Now the point of all this isn't to rush out and do a "decree nisi" or even to learn what it is exactly. (it essentially allowed him to continue contacting her is all... and brush aside their plebian presumptions like a gnat) this is rather advanced, but simply to show a real world example where trust law is what was operating, NOT statutory, because these people like savvy computer operators, knew where to go to find the default settings (automatic presumptions) and change them to their own preferences (expressed their own trust interpretation) That is all, it's just a real world example, mocking everyone who reads it... knowing it would go right over everyone's heads...

Believe me, like the computer, now that we know it is there... (has always been in fact, it is not going away... embrace it or deny it, both have their own consequences in terms of your empowerment, and your ultimate freedom

Legal, equity, trust references, definitions, plus...
http://www.4shared.com/office/fD-Ghf..._Equity_R.html

4shared is notorious for aggressive advertising and some people
can't figure out how to download (the "price" of "free"...)

GENERIC DOWNLOAD INSTRUCTIONS FOR - 4SHARED:
(save these instructions - avoid a lot of 'headaches')

click 4shared link provided to start...
(1) folders/files will display – Click on the folder or file only...
- new tab / window opens displaying selection to play or download
- underneath are two buttons:
"Download" and "Share with friends"

(2) select "Download"
- new tab / window opens with two buttons:
"PRIORITY DOWNLOAD" and "FREE DOWNLOAD"
"pop up" window appears - it's advertising
(shut it down and continue..)

(3) select "FREE DOWNLOAD"
a sign in 'box' will appear, sign in with
4shared account option at bottom
- Sign Up (left) - or Login (right)
(NO NEED to download anything to sign up)

(4) login: username password,
"download, save as, save" appears

[Mad Hatter]

For Ellisa (and others) who may well be visual learners (like me) there is a nice graphic at the bottom of this page...

http://freedomriver.wordpress.com/what-is-a-birth-certificate/

[MargueriteBee]

The (Real Question) is...

What did he (DO) to incur a $132,251.10 (Fine)...:confused:

http://gnosticwarrior.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Santos-image-2.jpg

http://gnosticwarrior.com/santos-bonacci-arrested-and-in-custody.html

PS - Until this can be honestly addressed, there is (NO) point in pointing Fingers or Jumping to Conclusions..!

And, 483 warrants? Wow. Looks like it is jacked up.

[naste.de.lumina]

OK, I will try and refrain from any further comment until the facts are in. In the meantime, here is some light reading to get ready for the truth to come out. This is from a post sigma6 did and I think it is appropriate.


EXPRESSING THE TRUST
– The Holy Grail of Control, or the Hidden System of Control.


ROMAN SYSTEM - Not necessarily bad, (or good for that matter, we must be more pragmatic, analytical to see what is going on...) it is a control system, and some one knows how to use it, and kept it secret from the rest of us... "Just-Is" "Just-us" But they are fighting to install this system all over the planet...

What no one is getting is the whole key to taking back our power is LEARNING the power of the remedy that was put in the hand of every man and woman who lives in a country that operates a fiat currency and registered the event of the parent "giving" their child a NAME. That event was registered, the documents held and reified (search "reification") into a security, the value derived from an actuarial value of the lifetime of labour of the corresponding living human being. Bonds were then issued and the money was "borrowed" from the banks, thus why all money is debt in this Bankruptcy Model of Economics. And this, in a nutshell is why and what makes us the Creditors, it our energy the corporations are borrowing, OUR "MONEY" (that's another VERY important story...) Anyhow, another aspect of this security is that it becomes part of an 'Estate', or Master Account, upon which all property and accounts are opened and attached to by chain of title. Two separate entities... the birth of a flesh and blood living soul, and the "birth" of a PERSON, sole corporation, Master account... Because it is a form of title (by definition) It is a property, a thing. In trust it is the "res".

The Birth Certificate should be read as DOE, JOHN, Estate.
Now... since they are holding the title to this property. But, it was INTENDED for you (since your mom INTENDED to give you that NAME...) (start getting in your head this NAME is a BIG deal. It's the Title (right to everything in that NAME man!) Drivers License - created from the BC, SSN - created from the BC... that is what I mean by chain of title... All title ultimately goes back to the Certificate (itself is only a token) that references the original signature document which evidences the Title. The BC has been specifically called a “valuable token” And they hold all the original signature documents (The Titles).

I should add for clarity, Title is right to something, if you have a whole complete Title to something, only God can take it away from you... literally, legally, equitably and morally. Conversely this is why cops and judges and government are crawling up your butt to scrape whatever they can find and steal it from you. They know you don't have the title to ANYTHING... So where is our remedy? We have to have a remedy, that is universal principle, especially if they want to be holding our title. That is the crucial understanding, that changes from "They are screwing us..." (and they are...) to "How do we get our power back? how did we lose control?..."

Think of the implications of this. If they are holding the titles to all the NAMEs, then by chain of title they are holding title to EVERYTHING!!! That it is also why you are listed as a tenant on your mortgage or "Deed of Transfer" for example (but that's another story...)

Therefore there is only ONE way to interpret this, it has to be a trust interpretation.

Maxim of Equity: "Equity looks to the intent rather than the form" Thus why we don't lose our superior interest just because another is holding property intended for us. This is why it is called equitable title. A trust means (in this example) Property is given to a "holder" (someone you "trust") and the Title is split in two parts by definition… (like a rental agreement for example, i.e it’s NOT a complete transferring over… ) One part is a legal title, the other is an equitable title. Again by definition equitable title is superior, thus equitable title IS superior interest. That is why we have superior interest to the legal title that the State is holding! Unlike the rental example, its not conveyed for their use but for its SAFEKEEPING. (Trust)

Thus this entire event, dynamic and incontrovertible legal, lawful and "roughed in" trust interpretation (waiting to be "manifested" or "realized") inevitably follow, are all 'baked into' that document (BC = valuable token) So powerful and important, it's the reason why they hold it... (among other reasons not just our benefit, (as will be explained below))

And if you don't think Equity trumps common law, there are many hints:

(Courts of Justice Act - R.S.O. 1990, CHAPTER C.43)

COMMON LAW AND EQUITY
Rules of law and equity: (R.S.O. 1990, c. C.43, s. 96 (1); 1993, c. 27, Sched.)
96. (1) Courts shall administer concurrently all rules of equity and the common law.

Rules of equity to prevail:
96. (2) Where a rule of equity conflicts with a rule of the common law, the rule of equity prevails.

Thus they are holding something that belongs to you... Thus they hold legal title, and therefore are the "statutory legal" property owner. That's why they like to pretend Statutory is the be all end all (it AIN'T, not by a long shot...) Natural Law is, Trust is, Equity is... Anyhow, you are the principal. You are the party with superior interest by definition. These words are CRITICAL. Claiming ownership to the NAME is lethal on both counts... both legally and a breach of the trust (as we step into the world of trust...like Alice through the Looking Glass) you can only claim your "superior interest". They undoubtedly have a huge obligation in holding it, but none the less, you can't claim title to the property (or any property if you think about it!!) You can only claim interest. If you understand this, you have 51% of all the understanding required and should be highly excited and motivated to want to learn more (haha)

One more time...

When one party is holding something that belongs to another...
And there is indisputable, incontrovertible, unequivocal proof of this (and you have that... it’s called a "Birth Certificate" Think of it as "proof of receipt" (thus why they make such a big deal in getting it to you when you want one... because it's an absolute trustee requirement in order for them to justify HOLDING your property in the first place!) Now then, the party that is holding what is rightfully yours has a "trustee" obligation. BIG TIME.

Another way to look at this. “IF” you had ever considered setting up a trust. One of the requirements would be to give the "Title" to the party that you are going to designate as the "Trustee"!!! And in turn you would require some "paperwork" in order to prove this arrangement. After that though, the trustee is YOUR FIDUCIARY in ALL matters pertaining to what they are holding!

So the government actually laid it out exactly in this fashion, just didn't bother to tell or educate the "little people" Now if no one shows up to make claim of interest, (I prefer NOTICE of Interest) to this trust (which most nobody has) then they would be forced to step in to maintain the trust (principle of trust law - a trust can't fail for lack of a trustee) but when they step in, they have declared themselves as Guardians with POA over it... tadaa... (don't you feel safer already?... hmm....)

And well, well, well what do you know?!... Isn't this exactly what the government (the State or Province) has done in fact! Now here's another aspect (or trick) It isn't exactly a trust yet. It is only POTENTIALLY one, All the pieces are there. (it’s a property of trust interpretation...) I know it sounds waffly, but it is and it isn’t. It’s more like a potential. It isn't a trust yet, in one sense, because you have NOT stepped up to the plate and "manifested your intention" to make it so. Now if you try to "claim" without clarifying exactly what you clearly mean, it might be a mistake, because it sounds like you are trying to claim property! But you don't have Title remember?! Point is, if you don't clearly understand this, they have a hundred ways to trip you up... You must claim superior interest! You must "EXPRESS" the trust! (before they try to create a constructive or resulting trust... and if they do, then you are sunk!) That’s right. The act of manifesting your intention, via instructions, a will, or "recognizing" (a form of contracting) that they are holding something that was intended for you. (notice that is the NOT the same thing as saying it is your property... think on that one...)

Understand this incredible dynamic, Understand the nature of your relationship to the NAME and what it actually really is... One of the things you must learn very clearly is what the difference between an EXPRESSED trust is vs a RESULTING or CONSTRUCTIVE trust.

An expressed trust will rebut any resulting or constructive trust. Which is why one possible way to do this is to make sure, one way or another, that the Birth Certificate is entered into the record of any court proceeding, and definitely, preferably, before any trial even starts. A4Ved, (Accepted for Value, it's an offer of indemnification in fact...) Along with instruction for settlement. (known as a Trust “indenture”) I believe the BC can be "presented" in court, and know of occasions where it has been FORMALLY presented in court. But… there is a private aspect to all this. And the offer to settle (trust instructions = indenture) must be referred to, or delivered to the Judge as "private" or "in the private" (i.e. outside of the public statutory... two separate things... and equity (trust interpretation) trumps statutory law, hands down, if you can get past their gauntlet.

Thus why they say we shouldn't even be physically going into the courts because if you submit the paperwork properly, they know they are left holding the bag. Your arrival would only be one last attempt to attach liability to you and by definition it is considered a form of presumption of jurisdiction. (i.e. just showing up is deemed presumption of jurisdiction. You are agreeing to go to Johnny’s house to play "monopoly". Remember Presumptions are "designed" to be rebutted, it's exactly like an "automatic setting" in a computer system. So that is not the problem. The problem is IDENTIFYING what it is they are PRESUMING! In order to let them know you are rebutting it!!! They will try to attach surety to you. Most people will get sucked in, in 2 minutes... Whereas if the ONLY evidence is the BC, (possibly both the long form and the short form = 2 witnesses) And it can only have one interpretation in court. They will dismiss, discharge, withdraw, etc, etc. We have seen this... I have a report from someone who did go in and ignored them when they called "the" NAME out 3 times. And they dismissed it.

So I know this is fundamentally correct. Just how to fit it into their rules of civil procedure is another question. After all the trick here is you are trying to deliver what is a "private trust settlement" into a public statutory probate court. Thus all their shenanigans, and 'acting' like they don't know. Do not be fooled. The only thing that would make sense is to do what is known as “invoke a court of equity” or deliver these docs (BC and possibly the long form as well), the acceptance (A4V signed for: signature, in trust), and instructions (indenture) beforehand to the Judge in "private" (since he is the only actor that can go into the private)

Thus the concept that CW's group is still trying to suss out... all the methods of invoking equity. For example one way I was told was to motion for a court of competent jurisdiction. (like a court of equity for example?)

This is all in alignment with one of the most universal maxims (indisputable truths) that “Whoever creates the liability must provide the remedy…” (mind you I am still looking for the source, Book, or manual... that is how "hidden" it must be...)

Regardless, this applies especially to us because we are all operating in a bankruptcy. That means they took away our ability to pay with real money. Even V the "guerrilla economist" in one of these threads, acknowledges this... A bankruptcy involves "trustees" (which means there's a trust....) And they DID give us the remedy!!. It's in your drawer! (or desk!) I don't care how secretive, "complicated" or labyrinthine it is, This IS what WE ALL NEED to learn.

EVERY ISSUE is NOW ONLY ONE ISSUE.
Correcting their statutory presumption of LIABILITY. PERIOD!!!
(do NOT go into their jurisdiction, or abandon all hope...)

And then acting "honourably" by presenting the Certificate of your indisputable proof of equitable interest. Your full faith and Credit in essence. What they have borrowed against and created bonds against (Gee do you think they are OWING you anything?????) With instruction (permission) to allow them to settle THEIR LIABILITY in the public. Thus we are using our equitable interest, our Faith and Credit, for the BENEFIT of the public.

The BC NAME you are holding is now their property (by virtue of holding legal title to the "thing" "res" original ink paperwork recording the gifting/giving of the "given name" from your mother to you. The piece of paper you hold is evidence of a legal property, that although it is correlated with the given name it is not that itself, it's a certificate. It's a legal entity, a property in it's own right. And it is government public property. And they again are holding title to that as well. But none the less, it is derived from the given NAME. (so technically the trust interpretation may be more complicated then I think, although the fundamentals are still sound re: superior interest=equitable title. And of course the problem is it is hard to find a way to exercise that without understanding trust interpretation!!

(Note: at this stage I don't want to get too much more into the actual application, but there is some clear and definite indications that we may need to include the SSN/SIN... because they need it to process the "public side" while they are doing the private settlement... but this is still in the research stage and only one interpretation)

This IS the solution to taking back our control. If you understand the power of a trust and the obligation of a trustee. Then you would understand why, even if it takes a few months, or a year, or 5 years, or 10 years... This is the point where your life changes. Where we become freed from the “SLAVERY” of their “GUARDIANSHIP” (POA over the CHILD named on the BC) Did you let that stop you from learning how to use a computer? (ok I know that may hurt for some... lol) but that is what we are dealing with... a system...


http://www.irs.gov/irm/part21/irm_21-007-013r.html
see IRS manual 21.7.13.3.2.2

2nd bullet under section 2:
An infant is the decedent of an estate or grantor, owner or trustor of a trust, guardianship, receivership or custodianship that has yet to receive an SSN.

http://www.irs.gov/pub/irs-tege/eotopici92.pdf (s6 - 130813)
IRC-7701 – General Discussion - 1992

definition of person: (pg. 2)
IRC 7701(a)(1) does not refer to "person" in the usual sense of a living human being. Rather, Reg. 301.7701-1(a) instructs that the term "person" includes an individual, corporation, partnership, trust or estate, joint-stock company, association, syndicate, group, pool, joint venture or other unincorporated organization or group, guardian, committee, trustee, executor, administrator, trustee in bankruptcy, receiver, assignee for the benefit of creditors, conservator, or any person acting in a fiduciary capacity.

D: Trust (pg. 7)
A working definition of "trust" is provided in Reg. 301.7701-4. The term "trust" as used in the Code refers to an arrangement created either by a will or by an inter vivos declaration whereby trustees take title to property for the purpose of protecting or conserving it for the beneficiaries under the ordinary rules applied in chancery or probate courts.

I highlighted “person” and “trust” it actually makes reference to "chancery" OR "probate" courts....

And we are the operators (or should be)... And they are the "ghosts" in the machine. Our house servants know how to run and manage the house (Estate) better then we do, and now they have tied us to the bed in the cellar, and are living the life of Reilly… under the guise that it is all for our benefit.

The fact is, they are NOT necessarily holding it completely for our benefit, it can most definitely be interpreted and justly so that they are holding it FOR THEIR BENEFIT. When you release any claim to property (all you need is superior interest…) You can identify the NAME (which is really the public… as per the Criminal Code definition of “any one”, “person” and “owner” or similar expressions, include Her Majesty, and an organization; (Public Corporations)

I am telling you this system is there. And the only way to understand it is to start taking the first steps to learning the fundamental principles of trust. What it is, how it operates, why it operates (very philosophical in fact...) In one sense it is the melding of the principles of law and morality. Think about it... trust. duty. obligation. Rights.

Statutory law is on the surface, a mishmash of commerce, admiralty, trust criminal, whatever (all mumbo jumbo to me) All superimposed over a bedrock that is ultimately trust. The language of the elite...

Don't believe this? Find it hard to fathom? I can't blame you, that's because you have nothing to reference it against... But consider this article, right in the mainstream, right under everyone's noses. Here is an example I came across... just by luck I was listening to an audio on the subject and caught it…
In fact it may be a useful tool for us... a tool of delivery of things from private to the public.


REAL WORLD EXAMPLE

Nigella Lawson’s ex reportedly threatened to commit suicide in an attempt to win back celebrity chef
http://arts.nationalpost.com/2013/08...paper-reports/

It makes reference to a “decree nisi”... (this is a clear reference to a trust interpretation and process)

091007 – MB&T.NTT – Debut NTT – 02.mp3
http://www.4shared.com/mp3/KxwzkQ3S/...ut_NTT_-_.html
In this Christian Walters audio, they start talking about it at around 60 minutes (I would start there at any rate)

In a nutshell what they are saying it is, is fascinating to say the least. It points up a couple of 'undeniables' Trust law is alive and well. And ‘rich’ people seem to know what it is... Consider, what kind of lawyer, (assuming he didn't represent himself) would have come up with this? (not a criminal lawyer...) Not that it helped him win, but it was incredibly odd that he was still able to remain in contact with her... and overcome the typical court orders... (that they automatically (by presumption) dump on us plebs...)

In a nutshell a decree nisi is described somewhat like this, but it is better you listen to the audio, to capture the spontaneity of the conversation
nisi decree: Start listening at approx 1:00:00 (is where it’s worth listening to)

interim decree from court (which is really you) not the judge
it’s purpose is to deliver something from the private side to the public side
and can be followed up with a notice of acceptance and default (or similar)

in this case it’s applied to a private settlement for example
- since it is interim, it doesn’t become absolute until the other party
fails to show why they shouldn’t have to follow it
- then it is absolute , unconditional, it stands so once this becomes absolute, you put in a show order against the decree the court (you) demanded

Now they have to follow AND they will automatically be in contempt as well...
Now the point of all this isn't to rush out and do a "decree nisi" or even to learn what it is exactly. (it essentially allowed him to continue contacting her is all... and brush aside their plebian presumptions like a gnat) this is rather advanced, but simply to show a real world example where trust law is what was operating, NOT statutory, because these people like savvy computer operators, knew where to go to find the default settings (automatic presumptions) and change them to their own preferences (expressed their own trust interpretation) That is all, it's just a real world example, mocking everyone who reads it... knowing it would go right over everyone's heads...

Believe me, like the computer, now that we know it is there... (has always been in fact, it is not going away... embrace it or deny it, both have their own consequences in terms of your empowerment, and your ultimate freedom

Legal, equity, trust references, definitions, plus...
http://www.4shared.com/office/fD-Ghf..._Equity_R.html

4shared is notorious for aggressive advertising and some people
can't figure out how to download (the "price" of "free"...)

GENERIC DOWNLOAD INSTRUCTIONS FOR - 4SHARED:
(save these instructions - avoid a lot of 'headaches')

click 4shared link provided to start...
(1) folders/files will display – Click on the folder or file only...
- new tab / window opens displaying selection to play or download
- underneath are two buttons:
"Download" and "Share with friends"

(2) select "Download"
- new tab / window opens with two buttons:
"PRIORITY DOWNLOAD" and "FREE DOWNLOAD"
"pop up" window appears - it's advertising
(shut it down and continue..)

(3) select "FREE DOWNLOAD"
a sign in 'box' will appear, sign in with
4shared account option at bottom
- Sign Up (left) - or Login (right)
(NO NEED to download anything to sign up)

(4) login: username password,
"download, save as, save" appears



Realize the difficulty in trying to explain ?

There seems to be a 'magic ' (knowledge of the structural construction of thought ) , a trick of language that forces the discussion to be defined through this treacherous and recherché vocabulary, which logically provide difficulties in understanding , although lower the knowledge of it .

I still can not understand the size and impact that information, properly understood, can bring to the individual, at first individually and collectively as a result, will surely make a difference in terms of expansion of consciousness.

Surely consciousness that come upon this new information at the same time it tries to mentally organize them in a logical structure to be able to comprehensively understand them, will also trying to fit them in a logical and meaningful in an aspect more abstract understanding of the 'General Big Drama'.

I'm really grateful for the opportunity to be able to acquire this knowledge in life because I'm pretty sure that will be decisive in future steps of our individual and collective evolution .

Thanks to gripreaper and Sigma6 .

Naste .

[SilentFeathers]

It's unconstitutional here in the states to lock someone up for owing a debt...yet they do it all the time (IRS, Child Support, etc etc). Probably the same type of gray laws and laws that can be interpreted a million ways apply in Australia too. Sounds to me he got thrown in to "debtors prison".....for owing a debt.

Santos may be a bit rough around the edges to some, but, he's not a reptilian elite sorcerer trying to enslave, kill, or poison others. He may be standing his ground on his own personal principals concerning this matter and that is his choice. Until the facts are clear, it's all speculation on our part as to why exactly he got caged.

....and as we most all know, us peasants (normal people) have a real difficult time dealing with the power brokers (wannabe gods) who run these systems of enslavement and control on this planet, especially when we piss them off or owe them money.

[Operator]

It's unconstitutional here in the states to lock someone up for owing a debt...yet they do it all the time (IRS, Child Support, etc etc). Probably the same type of gray laws and laws that can be interpreted a million ways apply in Australia too. Sounds to me he got thrown in to "debtors prison".....for owing a debt.


What amazes me is that one of the consequences mentioned is not being able to renew driving license etc. It happens more
often that punishments are not related to the cause of the punishment. That by itself is not 'correcting' the problem.

Common law suggests that one is responsible for the damage done and should restore/repair/pay to cover the damage.
That can only be done if there is a direct relation between root cause and punishment.

[WhiteFeather]

How interesting Whitefeather my friend that you were not aware of my good friend Santos until now. He is a fabulous man with such great insight of the real deal of how life has been playing out.

You can spend many hours listening to his lectures at his youtube channel http://www.youtube.com/user/MrAstrotheology

you will love Santos's knowledge for sure!

He is a very knowledgeable man that you will love for sure!!!


Enjoy! Much love to us all :grouphug:




I have never heard of Santos till this thread :o. However i have listened to some of his Astrotheology videos and i am ultimately impressed with his intelligence of the universe. I am in Awe. Im sure the universe will pay great respect to this inspiring human being.

As my energy is focused on your release from custody forthwith Santos. Asquali my Kola. Godspeed to you.

We are all connected.....

W.f.

Yes KImberly thats why i placed an embarassment smiley on that post. There is so much going on with respect to great videos and information out there on the internet , that one cannot possibly even fathom covering all of its entirity in a single incarnation.

And if i may ...Eventually im sure i would of bumped into Santos sooner or later. ;)
.....cause "Rivers always reach the sea" an excerpt from the song, Ten years gone by Led -Zeppelin. One of my top favorite zeppelin tunes alongside "In The light". Excuse me while Im getting the lead out. ;)


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3s9P6asA25g

[Kimberley]

Here is an interesting guy, Emanuele Nusca, asking people to donate money to help Santo's.

pt7AzpWQIok

Link to make a donation:

http://videos.universaltruthschool.com/make-a-donation/

I am keeping an eye on this situation and at this point I am not finding any statements from Santo's. I expect at some point we will hear from him.

:grouphug:

[gripreaper]

Kimberly,

This arrest of Santos dovetails into your thread on prisons, what can be done. I hope that over the course of this unfolding with Santos, that a greater understanding emerges as I feel like a lone wolf in the wilderness with sigma6 when it comes to explaining what is really going on.

The rest of us, all of us...

We give all our energy to the system. WE are the creditors, and WE were bonded at birth and an estate trust created to leverage against. WE have already paid for everything. It is our energy which is the only thing that has value.

Ownership is fallacious, as even the elite full well know. They do everything in trusts. They know that it is expressing the trust which holds the energy on the quantum. The Constructive Trusts of the Vatican from the 12th century still hold enough energy as they have never been expressed and rebutted.

I know this is a hard concept to grasp as we are so stuck in the central banking systems of exponential debt and yet, we must get this. THE DEBT is NOT our debt. Those public debt instruments circulating through commerce, which we call money, are "promises to pay" that carry ususry with them and a maturity date where they must be back at the Federal Reserve (usually 30 years). They are tracked by a CUSIP# and must be rolled over and MORE debt created to continue to support this ponzi. NONE of the debt instruments "parked" on the sidelines in savings accounts or investment accounts have any value. They are all maturing and ALL DUE BACK at the Fed and the usury must be paid.

Of course, we are stuck on the plantation as indentured slaves supporting this lie and and if we want to "jump the fence" it will most likely take a mass awakening as to the truth of how the system works, how everything is commerce, how we are wards of the state and chattel property as vessels in Admiralty. The Constructive Trust held energetically by our tacit acquiescence to it, is what feeds it and without our participation it could not stand.

So, in essence, we are all complicit in supporting the curse of subjugation, the "memes" of scarcity and slavery, the idea of imperialistic colonialism and survival of the fittest, the raping and pillaging of the earth, and the arrest and conviction of those who do not comply to the unlawful commercial admiralty rules and statutes of the bankrupt corporatocracy. Santos is being held as surety against the bond which was created by the alleged debt he allegedly owes. It's energy vampirism in full view.

I don't know how to get across that we are slaves, that there is no longer any representative government, that the current de facto government is a bankrupt corporation, that there is no money, that all tangibles and intangibles have been hypoticated and pledged to the elite, that we operate under an executive military state of emergency, bankrupt and in receivership to the elite, and that all of the leverage against the debt pyramid is a ponzi not backed by anything and has no allodial lawful titles to anyone who participates and "thinks" they have assets..

I guess it may need to get a lot more uncomfortable and hit the remaining American upper middle class right in their living rooms before they join the rest of us in poverty. Those who still "think" they have assets and hold positions of power in their state and communities and can influence the body politic, finding out that the electoral process is totally sold out and corrupt and their balance sheets are empty of any real assets....

THEN.....

Will we stop supporting the system and let it collapse? Will we remove the psychopaths from power? Will we be outraged with the commercial debtors prisons right in front of our eyes? Will we stop pimping our grandkids to the system?

Will we REALLY be ready to "do something about it"? I wonder. Out of the 200 regular members here at Avalon who come here every day, I know of only two who get it. Sigma6 and Hip Hipnotist. we-R-one got it and so did a small handful of others who are no longer here.

The rest, I'm afraid, don't read the links on trusts or understand trusts and how they work. Till we do, I guess we are just anarchists and revolutionaries as Ellisa has called us? We should just "go along to get along" and be happy slaves?

We should just "donate to Santos and pay the fine and post bail for him?" Is this really what we want? Is this what Santos wants? More acquiescence to the corrupt system?

I'm afraid I'm a bit discouraged and may need to leave Avalon. As we shout at the castle walls and lament our slavery and petition our overlords to "go easier on us" and throw a few more scraps over the wall to us in the form of benefits and privileges, the forest are burning and the skies are clouded and the slaves are beating and torturing their own brothers and sisters for attempting to walk away from the lie.

Where are the Gandi's of this generation? I know, I hear those voices, the cries from my comrades who would beseech me to "do it" as I am more aware of what's going on so I should lead. Well, this time WE MUST ALL LEAD. YOU have to "get it" before I can help you. There are NO MORE guru's except the one within.

As part of any transition and shift in consciousness at this time, the main requirement is self determination, self responsibility and self actualization, which emanates into the matrix and causes energetic shifts on the quantum and breaks the ancient curses held in the ancient trusts. Otherwise watch more of your brothers and sisters fall into poverty and stay in the matrix of control, get locked up in debtors prisons or worse, but don't call us anarchists and revolutionaries because we are NOT, OK Ellisa?

[naste.de.lumina]

Bonacci being arrested.

Sul_mDCDxWk

[Sunny-side-up]

Anyone would think polite and gentle Mr Santos (If that was he lol) was a known violent criminal, so many police sent to collect his payment!

[Gardener]

There were a few more who 'got it' (also gone) It is one of the hardest mountains one will or can climb. Hang in there Grip, the light is shining through the cracks for some of us. I don't pretend to 'get it', that is viscerally yet, I see the cracks and I strive to 'know' who I really am, the 'I' past the frequency fence, the electrified, razor-wire fence which holds this darn scam in place, it's inside us. We are our own prison, helped by the armies 'out there' the threat of [..fill in the blank...], fed by fear the fence stays in place.

Grip----> As part of any transition and shift in consciousness at this time, the main requirement is self determination, self responsibility and self actualization, which emanates into the matrix and causes energetic shifts on the quantum and breaks the ancient curses held in the ancient trusts.

one drop of hot water dropped in a bucket of icy water changes the temperature of the whole bucket by such a miniscule amount, but drop after drop after drop after drop and eventually..............

Santos is a Warrior of the first order, he has some of the best minds in the field behind him.

[Mad Hatter]

Mad Hatter dons his 'sleepers' cap...


I know of only two who get it. Sigma6 and Hip Hipnotist. we-R-one got it and so did a small handful of others who are no longer here.

Interesting 'presumption' there grip. Otherwise I tend to agree with most of what you say.

Just got back from spending nearly three hours (as a witness), with Rob at 277 Williams Street in Melbourne where 'The Crown in the Right of the State of Victoria' has contracted 'Tenix Solutions IMES Pty Ltd' (a Salteri Family company) to trade as 'Civic Compliance Victoria' (purportedly intellectual property of the Vic. guberment). For those interested in more on that go here... http://www.clrg.info/wp-content/uploads/CivicComplianceVictoriaExplained.pdf

Loooong story short, two desk clerks, a 'Registrar' and a lot of running off to the back office to double check stuff later, here is the state of play from this exercise as far as we know it to be.

The 486 warrants issued for non payment of (mainly toll road) fines led to the arrest, the only Prima Facie illegality of which that may be questionable rests on who signed it. If a registrar acting as an officer of the court whilst working for a private company signed it, well...

Due to what will only be viewed by the 'system' as belligerent behavior, Santos' refusal to sign the bail form (amongst other things) means the matter has to be be put before a magistrate. In keeping with the fact that the police cannot hold him for more than a certain number of days this matter has been set down for Dandenong magistrates court on Wednesday the 29th of January 2014.

Civic Compliance were advised of the action so on their system the fines have been zeroed out and the matter passed back to the Sheriffs office, who in turn, having done their part have zeroed out their system as the matter is now entirely down to whichever Magistrate presides on the day.

Since the decisions based in one Magistrates court are not binding on any others it can be a case of 'pot' luck in that arena. Some of those supporting him seem believe he will definitely walk on that day. Others say maybe.

Conjecture on my part but consider this, further displays of the aforementioned belligerence may well see a charge of contempt of court (not that those on the ball cannot deal with that) thrown into the mix as well and Mr prosecutor may well move up a jurisdiction/court/judge that not only has the ability to have him cooling his heels to pay off the entire alleged debt but also 'binds' any lower court.

We inquired what the current daily rate is with regard to paying in this manner and it currently stands at ~ $145 a day. A rough bit of quick maths and we arrive at around 910 days ie panning out to nearly two and a half years.

Once again conjecture on my part but it seems to me that Santos has made a decision to go on a crusade as a potential martyr for the cause. All well and good assuming those around him ie family etc. are happy with the potential impact this may well have on him & them.

Keeping in mind Santos' talent for poking / exposing the 'system' his detractors have run some fairly ugly smear campaigns across the web including accusations of being involved in pedophilia. Given that the advice currently being relied upon stems from half a world away with no track record of having been successfully applied within the star chambers referred to in this country as courts of law, I can only assume they are confident to such a degree that they will not have to worry about any implications if it all goes south, as the prospect of even a short stay at the Melbourne remand center, unjustly pre-tagged as a rock-spider, is a proposition that should make anyone think twice. A prime example of how that might go is is the hiding Carl Williams copped when it wasn't supposed to be able to happen...

As one of my martial arts instructors used to say

Rule one - Walk away
Rule two - Run away
Rule three - Fly away
Rule four - strike hard, strike fast, strike first!!

So far a fail on all counts but there you have it...

Rob of course has a solution which does not entail poking about in 'the belly of the beast' Per se, but as this may not suit differing agendas it will indeed be interesting to see the choices made by various parties and how this plays out.

Anyways that's prolly more than enuff from me so I will go back to 'sleep' at least until next Wednesday. :p

PS - FYI My original post re 72 hours was actually to do with the speed of banking transactions in this country and nothing to do with procedural issues on another continent. Sorry for not making that clearer at the time.

cheers

[turiya]

I would call the following an attempt to prune the leaves on a tree, while throwing one's own 'standing in honor' / integrity under the bus. These grunt 'officials' are not going to understand, they don't speak the same language.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fXhtyCvQL3s&feature=share&list=UUfhYKxfb_JaIz2aNT-2ZdaQ&index=2

Pruning leaves on the tree will not effect the livelihood of the tree. Digging at the roots would be something else altogether. Although, most assuredly. the leaves are able to put you in a position where one will have better access to deal with the roots - the courtroom. Or, the roots will deal with you in their own way.



http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-821195.mp3

Rod Class on the need for a Corpus Delicti Hearing
& Demand for a Declaratory Judgment


Tonight’s topic is the trust. Everybody has been dancing around it. Nobody has ever come up with where they are getting their information from. And that has always hurt us. Its easy to talk. The problem is: when you are walking into that courtroom & the judge asks you a question, you better be able to give him an answer as to where this stuff is coming from, and not from “I got it from some guy off some internet radio or I got it from some friend that lives down the street.” That is not a proper response.

And that’s been the problem here. Everybody’s talked about the trust – everybody says the birth certificate is the trust. But when you ask them, “Okay, where is it stated that the birth certificate is the trust – where in the law did you find it?” And they never tell you, because, (1) either they don’t know, or (2) they don’t want to give up their trade secret.

For you new people… I don’t play that. You are entitled to know where I get my information from. Because, if you are going to walk into a courtroom, you better be able to sit down & explain it. The gentleman that taught me many years ago, whenever we talked about this – the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME. And I asked him, “Okay, you made the statement... Where can I find this?” And nobody had an answer.

Well, we found it. And we put it out on the airwaves. It is in Texas Administrative Code under Corporations, Chapter 79, Section 79.31, it talks about the ALL CAPs. The United States Style Manual gets into this.

Tonight, we are going to get into the Birth Certificate & we’re going to show you where all the fraud lies in all of this & how they are dragging you into the courtroom under a TRUST NAME or under an ESTATE.

Because we have been trying to find this for years, and, part of it has been that if you would go in and you got to say, “I am here for a ‘Special Appearance’.”

If I was a judge, and you were to tell me, “I am here for a Special Appearance” I would want you to explain it to me, so I know what is ‘special’ about you. People don’t have answers, people can’t answer that question – “I am here for a ‘Special Appearance’” So, what’s different about your paperwork that makes you ‘special’?

We are going to get into that tonight.

Let’s talk tonite about the Trust under the Birth Certificate on how they are dragging you & I into that courtroom under that ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME. What I recently discovered in the District of Columbia State’s Statutes – this is where I found it. I also found in some of the other State’s Statutes, not quite the same wording, but what we found in Washington DC Statutes under Birth Certificate, and why we never went & looked under the State Statutes for birth certificate – on what the definition of a birth certificate is – what is the definition of a ‘live birth’. And what is a definition of a ‘Person’ under a Birth Certificate, and the fact that the Social Security Number is attached to the birth certificate at the moment the child is born. They automatically get a number, immediately.

Under DC Code Section 7-201 Definitions, if you go down to Section 9, it says ‘Live Birth’ means the complete expulsion, or extraction, from its mothers, of a product of human conception. http://www.asisvcs.com/publications/pdf/670925.pdf

This is part of the problem we are having in a courtroom. They are saying something to you, and you’re not comprehending what is being said. Because you have your mind on something else, and not on what is being said.

Why would they use the word ‘its’, why would they not use – extraction from the ‘child’s’ mother? Now going down to Section 10 – Persons. ‘Person’ means an individual. Problem of it is, there is no definition that I have come across within the Codes for the word ‘individual’. It always refers back to a corporation, or trust, or an association. ‘Person’ means an individual, a trust. A ‘person’ is a trust, a ‘person’ is an estate, a ‘person’ is a partnership. A ‘person’ is a corporation, including an association, a joint stock companies… Now wait a minute, you are, at live birth, are now considered joint stock companies. It further goes in and says, an insurance companies – so you are an insurance company, not a living being… not a flesh & blood man. Everything that we’re going to get here – you’re not going to hear the word ‘living soul’, ‘living person’, ‘living man, living child, living son, living daughter’. You’re not going to hear none of that.

It further says, that a person – the district government, or an agency or instrumentality of the district government. This is what is under a birth certificate definition for the word ‘person’. So, you are listed, at the time you are extracted from your mother, as a trust, as an estate, as a partnership, as a corporation, including a association, joint stock companies, an insurance company, the district government, or an agency or instrumentality of the district government.

Now, if you were to get into Title 26 USC Code 7701, which is IRS, and it says under Title 26 Section 7701, subtitle (f) Chapter 79
26 U.S.C.

United States Code, 2011 Edition
Title 26 - INTERNAL REVENUE CODE
Subtitle F - Procedure and Administration
CHAPTER 79 - DEFINITIONS
Sec. 7701 – Definitions
a) When used in this title, where not otherwise distinctly expressed or manifestly incompatible with the intent thereof—
(1) Person - The term “person” shall be construed to mean and include an individual, a trust, estate, partnership, association, company or corporation.

You are classified as a trust, estate, registered to the State of which you were born at which point under the 1935 Social Security Act, Title 5 Section 501 & 502, under Grants to the State, the day that you came out of your mother & got a number, the State got X amount of dollars for your live birth & federal grant money for each fiscal year. http://www.ssa.gov/history/35act.html#TITLE%20V

Now, I want you to think about what we are talking about here. There is the proof that everybody has been looking for to go back & prove that the birth certificate is the trust in this issue. Nobody has ever sat down and told you where to find it. So when you now go into these courts, what we are doing… and this is for those that are capable to understand this, in other words, do not go down this path until you get better knowledge behind you, when you are better prepared to be able to go ‘head to head’ in the courtroom. Because part of the problem that we are running into is this: When you are dealing with your paperwork, it says ‘The State of…’ You will never find an address under the heading of ‘State of…’. When you do paperwork, you are required to put an address. You are required to tell them where you live, so they know where to mail. What I have done in my paperwork, I have listed the United States of America as an unknown entity, with an undisclosed address. I went back in and used the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME as a registered government trade name, that is either a Ward, or is a Property of the government.

Now follow me with what we’re saying here, because this is important for you to come back in. This is why when I started out – you are to make a ‘Special Appearance’. If you are going to use the ‘State of…’, and you’re going to use that ALL CAPTIAL LETTER NAME, and you’re going to make a ‘Special Appearance’ – you did not take yourself out of the Trust side of this thing. If you just leave that name, and you don’t designate it as a government Trade-Name, as a Ward, or Property, or Trust – if you do not make the distinction between that ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME & you.

This is where the problem is coming in.
Because when I did my paperwork in Washington DC, I ran some test runs, and I have given them some fits, because when I listed that ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME as a government registered Trade-Name, as a Ward or Property of the government, then I come down and place my lower-case name, and I put it as a ‘Real Party of Interest’. And because of what we found on the Birth Certificate, and what we’ve found in other languages, I would never use the words a ‘Flesh & Blood Man with a Soul’ on any of my documentation, because I could not verify that.

Throughout the year that we’ve been doing this, we have said if you go into Title 7 under Agriculture of Section 136 >> http://trac.syr.edu/laws/07/07USC00136.html << look up the word ‘animal’ it defines an animal as a vertebrate [and invertebrate] which is a man, a mammal, fish & shellfish.
d) Animal
The term "animal" means all vertebrate and invertebrate species,
including but not limited to man and other mammals, birds, fish,
and shellfish.
So, man is listed as an animal.

If you get into ‘Human Being’ under Title 1 Chapter 1 Section 8, Human Being is defined as Homo Sapien. If you get into the Latin side of this, and look under the Vatican for the Latin language, a ‘Human Being’ is considered a Monster, or an Animal.

Now, what we are doing is we’re asking for is a Corpus Delicti & Habeas Corpus hearing. Now why would I ask for such a thing? We’re going back in and we’re asking the judge to define the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME of RODNEY DALE CLASS & the lower-case name Rodney Dale Class. I want the judge to define which one is the Trust name, Trade-Name, Animal & which one is the Living Soul?

Because when the judge calls your name, he doesn’t say I want the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME of RODNEY DALE CLASS to stand up, or, the lower-case name of Rodney Dale Class to stand up, or the RODNEY DALE CLASS that is classified as an Animal to stand up.

Harvey: He also doesn’t say “I want the Rodney Dale of the family of Class to stand up.

Rod: Exactly. So, their coming in and using the name. So, what you’re doing is that you’re now coming in and you are going to ask for a Corpus Delicti & Habeas Corpus Hearing, and you want a Declaratory Judgment, because you want the Prosecutor to bring in the Accusing Party & you want the Prosecutor to identify the Accused – “Are you accusing the Trust Name under the Birth Certificate? Are you Accusing the Estate Name under the Birth Certificate, or are you accusing the Ward of the government? Because when you use the ALL CAPITAL LETTER NAME, it is a Trust, it is an Estate, it is a Ward of the government. So we are here to distinguish – are we talking about a ‘Monster’, by legal definition? Are we talking about an Animal, by legal definition? Are we talking about a ‘Person’ that is an Estate, a Trust, a Partnership, an Insurance Company, a Joint Stock Company? Are we talking about a ‘Person’ that is an Officer of a Corporation or an Employee of a Corporation?

Or, are we sitting here talking about a Living, Flesh & Blood Soul?

We need to clear this up on what we are doing, here. We need to clear all this up. So, we need a Corpus Delicti Hearing on this issue. We want the Prosecutor to come in & we want him to define. And, we want the judge to give us a Declaratory Judgment on what is being charged in this courtroom. Because, unless we get a Declaratory Judgment, until we find out WHO is the Corpus Delicti, they can’t move.

For example, in a child custody battle in a courtroom:
Is it not true that all Birth Certificates are Registered to the State?
Is it also not true that under the Social Security Act of 1935 (http://www.ssa.gov/history/35act.html#TITLE%20V), the State receives federal grant money for that child being born?

When the State holds the child as a Ward of the State, then the State should pick up the tab. The same goes with an IRS case situation.

More on the mp3. (http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-821195.mp3)

turiya :cool:

[raregem]

The (Real Question) is...

What did he (DO) to incur a $132,251.10 (Fine)...:confused:

http://gnosticwarrior.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/01/Santos-image-2.jpg


http://gnosticwarrior.com/santos-bonacci-arrested-and-in-custody.html

PS - Until this can be honestly addressed, there is (NO) point in pointing Fingers or Jumping to Conclusions..!


It shows "date served" as 09-01-2014. What am I missing here? September 2014 has not arrived on this timeline. !
Also, 483 infringement warrants...?....really?. wow

[Operator]

It shows "date served" as 09-01-2014. What am I missing here? September 2014 has not arrived on this timeline. !
Also, 483 infringement warrants...?....really?. wow

Ehhm, there exists more worlds outside the US ... :p

In other countries they prefer day/month/year ... I've read somewhere that the / and - separators indicate
which notation/order should be followed.

I prefer the computer/database notation: year-month-day that's unambiguous and easier allows to sort dates.

[Operator]

By the way ... I see other anomalies.

I don't see a name/address combination ... which normally is the cause of ignoring these things (you are NOT your name)
And also it says 'Regulations' ... is that legal ? ... let alone lawful ?

[SilentFeathers]

Xbp6umQT58A

[Mad Hatter]

PASS IT ON FOR OUR BROTHER SANTOS BONACCI...

For any Melbournians interested in supporting Santos Bonacci - he is in Dandenong Magistrates Court Room 1 or 2 on Wednesday 29th January.

The time given is 9.30pm - but as many of us know - that usually means the time the "court" starts, so who knows what time his 'special appearance' will be???

Check on Tuesday after 5pm on the website below to confirm details...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_lists_crim.pl?court=009

Court list gets updated after 5pm each day...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl casenum=E10227198&date=29012014


FOR ANYONE ATTENDING...
Please go the Santos Bonacci FB page and post you are coming - so we can look out for each other....
@ https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci?fref=ts

Dandenong Magistrates' Court (see map below)
Address: Corner Foster Street & Pultney Street, Dandenong
(03) 9767 1300 (Switchboard).
Criminal (03) 9767 1399

Parking
* Langhorne Street entrance - 25 public spaces.
* Pultney Street entrance - 9 public spaces + 2 disabled spaces.
* Cnr Pultney and Wilson Streets - 140 public spaces.
* Large number of free all day parking spaces are available opposite the court complex in Pultney Street.

Train
Dandenong Station is located in Foster Street 5 minutes walk from the court complex.
Go to http://ptv.vic.gov.au/ for further information.

Buses
Terminus located at railway station.

From here... http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl?casenum=E10227198&date=29012014

Case Number: E10227198
Date: 29/01/2014
Time: 09:30
Prosecuting Agency: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
MELBOURNE
Informant: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
Accused: BONACCI, SANTO
Hearing Type: Penalty Enforcement Hearing
Plea: NO PLEA TAKEN
Location: Dandenong Magistrates' Court
Court Room No.: 0

As an aside we have the purported public service in the form of the Police acting as debt collectors for private toll road company...

[alh02]

PASS IT ON FOR OUR BROTHER SANTOS BONACCI...

For any Melbournians interested in supporting Santos Bonacci - he is in Dandenong Magistrates Court Room 1 or 2 on Wednesday 29th January.

The time given is 9.30pm - but as many of us know - that usually means the time the "court" starts, so who knows what time his 'special appearance' will be???

Check on Tuesday after 5pm on the website below to confirm details...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_lists_crim.pl?court=009

Court list gets updated after 5pm each day...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl casenum=E10227198&date=29012014


FOR ANYONE ATTENDING...
Please go the Santos Bonacci FB page and post you are coming - so we can look out for each other....
@ https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci?fref=ts

Dandenong Magistrates' Court (see map below)
Address: Corner Foster Street & Pultney Street, Dandenong
(03) 9767 1300 (Switchboard).
Criminal (03) 9767 1399

Parking
* Langhorne Street entrance - 25 public spaces.
* Pultney Street entrance - 9 public spaces + 2 disabled spaces.
* Cnr Pultney and Wilson Streets - 140 public spaces.
* Large number of free all day parking spaces are available opposite the court complex in Pultney Street.

Train
Dandenong Station is located in Foster Street 5 minutes walk from the court complex.
Go to http://ptv.vic.gov.au/ for further information.

Buses
Terminus located at railway station.

From here... http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl?casenum=E10227198&date=29012014

Case Number: E10227198
Date: 29/01/2014
Time: 09:30
Prosecuting Agency: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
MELBOURNE
Informant: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
Accused: BONACCI, SANTO
Hearing Type: Penalty Enforcement Hearing
Plea: NO PLEA TAKEN
Location: Dandenong Magistrates' Court
Court Room No.: 0

As an aside we have the purported public service in the form of the Police acting as debt collectors for private toll road company...


Thanks Mad Hatter, your updates are very much appreciatred :)

Wish I could attend the hearing on Wednesday, but unfortunately I live in Brisbane so that won't be possible for me.

In any case, my thoughts are with Santos and I wish him the very best of luck... have a feeling he's gonna need all the help he can get!

If the courts were even remotely interested in ensuring justice gets served I might have a different opinion, but the reality (unfortunately) is that they are far more interested in generating revenue for the corporations that were responsible for establishing them.

Oh well, guess we'll just have to wait and see how things pan out on the day... anything is possible!

[Operator]

I think Santos mentioned having a son who is also involved in the whole freeman movement. So I think there will
be someone standing by to organize all the remaining necessities to get a fair hearing (like video taping it).

[gripreaper]

Rod Class is really getting to the heart of the matter, finally. Very prescient talkshoe where Rod Class explains the trust, the bonds, the prisons as debtor prisons, etc. Its only 30 minutes but well worth it.

http://recordings.talkshoe.com/TC-48361/TS-824716.mp3

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

I am in melbourne, but unfortunately wont be able to attend the court, though I wish I could. Going to link on the FB page now. Drum up some local support.

[jackovesk]

PASS IT ON FOR OUR BROTHER SANTOS BONACCI...

For any Melbournians interested in supporting Santos Bonacci - he is in Dandenong Magistrates Court Room 1 or 2 on Wednesday 29th January.

The time given is 9.30pm - but as many of us know - that usually means the time the "court" starts, so who knows what time his 'special appearance' will be???

Check on Tuesday after 5pm on the website below to confirm details...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_lists_crim.pl?court=009

Court list gets updated after 5pm each day...
@ http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl casenum=E10227198&date=29012014


FOR ANYONE ATTENDING...
Please go the Santos Bonacci FB page and post you are coming - so we can look out for each other....
@ https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci?fref=ts

Dandenong Magistrates' Court (see map below)
Address: Corner Foster Street & Pultney Street, Dandenong
(03) 9767 1300 (Switchboard).
Criminal (03) 9767 1399

Parking
* Langhorne Street entrance - 25 public spaces.
* Pultney Street entrance - 9 public spaces + 2 disabled spaces.
* Cnr Pultney and Wilson Streets - 140 public spaces.
* Large number of free all day parking spaces are available opposite the court complex in Pultney Street.

Train
Dandenong Station is located in Foster Street 5 minutes walk from the court complex.
Go to http://ptv.vic.gov.au/ for further information.

Buses
Terminus located at railway station.

From here... http://www.magistratescourtvic.ozehosting.com.au/cgi-bin/mc_crim_rec.pl?casenum=E10227198&date=29012014

Case Number: E10227198
Date: 29/01/2014
Time: 09:30
Prosecuting Agency: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
MELBOURNE
Informant: VICTORIA POLICE - TOLL ENFORCEMENT
Accused: BONACCI, SANTO
Hearing Type: Penalty Enforcement Hearing
Plea: NO PLEA TAKEN
Location: Dandenong Magistrates' Court
Court Room No.: 0

As an aside we have the purported public service in the form of the Police acting as debt collectors for private toll road company...

(MSM) 'Backing up your excellent Research' here Mad Hatter...:thumb:

Fine, toll dodger faces jail

January 29, 2014 5:23PM

http://resources2.news.com.au/images/2014/01/29/1226813/202778-0c70d8ae-887f-11e3-9562-bd04d5087486.jpg
Santos Bonacci outside court. Source: News Limited

A MAN arrested for amassing almost 500 Sheriff's warrants for toll road fees faces 916 days in jail if he refuses to pay the $132,000 fine.

Santos Bonacci, from Berwick, was bailed from Dandenong Magistrate's Court on Wednesday morning on 483 charges for unpaid EastLink and CityLink fees, as well as speeding fines, going back to early 2010.

The unemployed 51-year-old spent nine days in custody after twice refusing to apply for bail following his arrest earlier this month.

Barrister Peter Pickering, acting for the Sheriff's Office described Mr Bonacci as being "uncooperative" with police and the court.

"At the time of the apprehension of Mr Bonacci he was quite uncooperative. He said the police and court had no right to arrest him," Mr Pickering told the court.

But Mr Bonacci claimed the police were acting fraudulently and that he had been put under duress.

"I do not wish to be a party to fraud, sir," Mr Bonaccio told Magistrate Steven Raleigh.

He added that he sought a "peaceful remedy" to the situation.

Mr Bonacci was granted bail and must report to Narre Warren police station once a week.

He was also barred from publishing offensive comments about Sheriff's officers on social media after he recently posted a video on YouTube calling a police officer a "c---" and a magistrate a paedophile.

In the video, posted in December last year and showing police and Sheriff's officers towing a friend's car, Mr Bonacci described Victoria Police as a criminal organisation that engaged in fraud.

Outside court he told a gathering of supporters he wouldn't be paying the mammoth debt because police were acting fraudulently.

"Those roads and everything are built by we, the people. We own them," he said.

He is due to appear in court again on April 1.

http://www.heraldsun.com.au/news/law-order/fine-toll-dodger-faces-jail/story-fni0fee2-1226813202374

PS - Court Appearance...


"Those roads and everything are built by we, the people. We own them," he said.


Hallelujah Santos, I agree...:yes4:

I hope you make them the (April Fools) and expose the Govt. handover of 'Corporate Control' of our own roads that we've...


(PAID for in FULL) a 1000 times over...:wizard:

[gripreaper]

Santos Bonacci, from Berwick, was bailed from Dandenong Magistrate's Court on Wednesday morning on 483 charges for unpaid EastLink and CityLink fees, as well as speeding fines, going back to early 2010. The unemployed 51-year-old spent nine days in custody after twice refusing to apply for bail following his arrest earlier this month.

Who posted bail, and why? Now there is "joinder" and the court has jurisdiction by consent.

Santos will have to invoke the estate trust, express himself as the interested third party intervenor to the trust and appoint the prosecutor as trustee, and expose the "credit" created via the GSA bonds (bid bond, performance bond), and force the discharge and administration of the trust under probate.

I have no idea why or who posted bail.

[Kimberley]

The word is Santos was bailed by the magistrate to appear on April fools day. The next hearing will decide on how they deal with the fines.

Santos BONACCI Court MEDIA Conference *FULL UNCUT EXCLUSIVE* CENSORED From TV/TODAY TONIGHT + 9 NEWS

5ysESwj1w10

By the way toward the end the man with the red/brown beard is former Avalon member Lord Sidious. (Rob)

[turiya]

Santos Bonacci, from Berwick, was bailed from Dandenong Magistrate's Court on Wednesday morning on 483 charges for unpaid EastLink and CityLink fees, as well as speeding fines, going back to early 2010. The unemployed 51-year-old spent nine days in custody after twice refusing to apply for bail following his arrest earlier this month.

Who posted bail, and why? Now there is "joinder" and the court has jurisdiction by consent.

Santos will have to invoke the estate trust, express himself as the interested third party intervenor to the trust and appoint the prosecutor as trustee, and expose the "credit" created via the GSA bonds (bid bond, performance bond), and force the discharge and administration of the trust under probate.

I have no idea why or who posted bail.


It seems to me that he may have... its difficult to make out the audio, but he does say he signed a document under duress (V.C.). And that he conditionally accepts the contract upon proof of claim come April 1st.



http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yt3VtgC2oYI

turiya :cool:

[gripreaper]

The word is Santos was bailed by the magistrate

Bailed by the magistrate? What does that mean? The state forfeited the bond?

At any rate, he's out till April first, after signing something, even if under duress, and "conditionally" accepting their offer upon proof of claim, I don't think they are going to hear a word he says from here on in.

[Kimberley]

The word is Santos was bailed by the magistrate

Bailed by the magistrate? What does that mean? The state forfeited the bond?

At any rate, he's out till April first, after signing something, even if under duress, and "conditionally" accepting their offer upon proof of claim, I don't think they are going to hear a word he says from here on in.

Santo's explains it toward the end of the video that I posted.

[gripreaper]

The word is Santos was bailed by the magistrate

Bailed by the magistrate? What does that mean? The state forfeited the bond?

At any rate, he's out till April first, after signing something, even if under duress, and "conditionally" accepting their offer upon proof of claim, I don't think they are going to hear a word he says from here on in.

Santo's explains it toward the end of the video that I posted.

No he doesn't. He explains how the piece of paper means nothing to him because he signed it under duress. He explains how he spoke that he conditionally accepted their offer upon proof of claim, and that no contract has been produced which shows he contracted with them. He explains how a trust works in the court. He does not say who posted bail. Magistrates don't post bail.

We don't have all the information to know what happened. IF someone (Santos friends) posted bail on Santos behalf, then there is jurisdiction and joinder. Santos now becomes the "corpus" delecti of the trust and the joinder (nexus) between the corporate birth certificate bond and the living man is complete. He is now rendered incompetent and a ward of the court.

On April 1st, when he goes before the magistrate, within their jurisdiction, he is rendered mute. He will ask for the contract which binds him to the charge, invoke the trust and order the trustee to discharge the obligation. He may be successful, but the magistrate may order a psychological evaluation since the accused is not in compliance and is in contempt.

I'm looking forward to how Santos handles this, but in my opinion, he should have never posted bail or signed anything.

[Kimberley]

[/QUOTE]I'm looking forward to how Santos handles this, but in my opinion, he should have never posted bail or signed anything.[/QUOTE]

Gripreaper you understand this MUCH MUCH better than I do. I am still learning. I agree that "if" he signed anything that it may have been an incorrect move... And the information about Santos was bailed by the magistrate came from Lord Sidious who was there. That is what Rob told me.

I am sure we will be hearing from Santo's soon and he will explain.

[childs hood end]

you have to hand it to him hes keeping it real...

good look on Aprils first...

may the world see more Santos Bonacci`s.

[Sunny-side-up]

Sending Santos some helpful energies to keep calm those around him:wizard:

Love and Hugs to him.
Love and hugs to all!
Alan

[Kimberley]

I am a bit surprised that those following this seem to have not listened to this as it appears to me????

5ysESwj1w10

[turiya]

He explains how the piece of paper means nothing to him because he signed it under duress. He explains how he spoke that he conditionally accepted their offer upon proof of claim, and that no contract has been produced which shows he contracted with them. He explains how a trust works in the court. He does not say who posted bail. Magistrates don't post bail.

We don't have all the information to know what happened. IF someone (Santos friends) posted bail on Santos behalf, then there is jurisdiction and joinder. Santos now becomes the "corpus" delecti of the trust and the joinder (nexus) between the corporate birth certificate bond and the living man is complete. He is now rendered incompetent and a ward of the court.

On April 1st, when he goes before the magistrate, within their jurisdiction, he is rendered mute. He will ask for the contract which binds him to the charge, invoke the trust and order the trustee to discharge the obligation. He may be successful, but the magistrate may order a psychological evaluation since the accused is not in compliance and is in contempt.

I'm looking forward to how Santos handles this, but in my opinion, he should have never posted bail or signed anything.

The 10 Biggest Errors most people make when facing the Pirates and Privateers of the Private Bar Guilds: (http://blog.ucadia.com/2012/11/the-10-biggest-errors-most-people-make.html)

Error #1 – Not believing/realizing you are dealing with Pirates and Privateers
Error #2 – Hiring a Pirate believing they will serve your best interests against fellow Pirates and Privateers
Error #3 – Believing that “Magic Bullets” can defeat Pirates and Privateers
Error #4 – Believing that Pirates and Privateers will follow their own “rules”
Error #5 – Believing the Pirates and Privateers know the law
Error #6 – Fighting (creating conflict with) Pirates
Error #7 – Running away from facing the Pirates and Privateers
Error #8 – Sending/registering original documents with Pirates and Privateers
Error #9 – Surrendering (your person) to Pirates and Privateers
Error #10 – Forgetting to demonstrate who and what we truly are [60] Despite the labels of pirates and privateers- forgive those who act in such a manner. Rise above the hatred, the cruelty. Be a beacon of honesty, respect and honor so that such character shines like a blinding light against judicial corruption. Never forget that your are immortal and how we live (and die) in one life can affect many lifetimes of lessons.

Above all, be gentle with yourself and with others. Thank you - Frank O'Collins
SOURCE (http://blog.ucadia.com/2012/11/the-10-biggest-errors-most-people-make.html)
posted by turiya :cool:

[gripreaper]

Thanks turiya for the link to Acadia. Frank O'Collins is awesome. So is Rod Class and the few who are currently in the trenches and teaching the truth, of course Santos also being one of these few. It's a huge rabbit hole and sometimes hard to wrap ones mind around, since the fraud has been conditioned into us in every aspect of our lives, and we are part and parcel to it.

How does one extract from a system which is in our very DNA and holds everything we have ever been taught and everything we have ever worked for? I know it's tough. Here is retired Judge Dale who tells the story in about 95 pages. Those who are new to this, or who need a deeper understanding of the whole fraud should read Judge Dale.

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf

[Kimberley]

Like I said GripR... I trust in your knowledge around all of this MUCH MORE than mine.. I am still learning this "stuff" and i know it is so very important!!!!

Thank you for helping me learn. Please be patient with me... Thanks!!!! :-) :hug:

[naste.de.lumina]

Thanks turiya for the link to Acadia. Frank O'Collins is awesome. So is Rod Class and the few who are currently in the trenches and teaching the truth, of course Santos also being one of these few. It's a huge rabbit hole and sometimes hard to wrap ones mind around, since the fraud has been conditioned into us in every aspect of our lives, and we are part and parcel to it.

How does one extract from a system which is in our very DNA and holds everything we have ever been taught and everything we have ever worked for? I know it's tough. Here is retired Judge Dale who tells the story in about 95 pages. Those who are new to this, or who need a deeper understanding of the whole fraud should read Judge Dale.

http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf

Reading this work is fascinating (in terms of historical clarification) at the same time is a bitter pill to swallow.

I read a few pages and my indignation rises to dangerous for my mental health levels.

Still'm slowly getting on with the reading.

Thank you for providing this information.

Hug.

Naste.

[aniN]

more info from Santos: http://www.blogtalkradio.com/criticalmassradioonline/2014/01/30/outside-the-box-open-forum-with-kate-of-gaia

[Gardener]

Some Gems in that doc' Grip, thanks for posting.

[Akasha]

9plu2MNiqrY

[Akasha]

The court scene which Santos refers to in the latter part of his presentation is (I think) this one:

pEOcPRxtcYM

Are there, by any chance, any Avalonians who can shed any more light on that case? For example, was Wilfred Keith Thompson summoned back at a later date and then prosecuted under admiralty law?

Whilst still being pretty ignorant of this topic, my gut tells me it's the gamechanger for humanity.

[gripreaper]

I keep checking for updates and listening to the blogtalk radio with Kate and Santos, but still no mention of the bail, who posted it, and why.

Thanks Turiya, gardener and naste~ for you words of encouragement, and for taking the time to read the Judge Dale pdf. Its all in there, isn't it?

[naste.de.lumina]

I keep checking for updates and listening to the blogtalk radio with Kate and Santos, but still no mention of the bail, who posted it, and why.

Thanks Turiya, gardener and naste~ for you words of encouragement, and for taking the time to read the Judge Dale pdf. Its all in there, isn't it?

I think so. Or almost all.
In addition to understanding the process of assembling the trap system I still have to try to see what is the same or not between the U.S. and Brazilian system.
The Brazilian legal system followed the German origin, and they are somewhat different.
This is one of the main subjects of my interest, but do not have much information as you know.
Thank you for your attention.

Hug.

Naste.

[Mad Hatter]

Hi peeps,

I don't want to put words in anyone's mouth here since I was unfortunately unable to be present that early in the day due to other commitments. That said an update from Rob Halford (aka Lord Sidious) was that bail was indeed posted by the Magistrate. It is how the system works here as it is not like America and surety is not required in all cases.

Also in 'Rob's' view the magistrate was actually trying to be very helpful in a hint hint sort of way since when it comes to proceedings on April 1st (oh the irony) the decision he will have in front of him (my paraphrasing) is either jail time or perhaps it could be wiped entirely if say there where some physical medical grounds...

Further discussion / listening to Santos that evening it seems to me he recognises that the belligerence he had been displaying (re swearing etc) was / is a mistake so I hope that those new to his work don't shoot the messenger purely on those grounds as his knowledge in the arena of Astro-theology is IMO matched only by a very few. Unfortunately he does not have the same 'real world' experience in our kangaroo courts (yet?) but huge kudos for a brilliant opening round!!

Re 'Judge bows to Freeman in court' video. Although Canada is purportedly a common law country for that claim to be correct things must be different here in Aus since judges always bow to the entire court on entry and exit', which if I'm not mistaken cues the next 'Act'or to make an offer for all present to contract with the judge and thus understand (stand-under) his authority which is delivered in the form of "All rise" followed by "Please be seated" thus leaving him in a position of having twice asked those present to accept his authority with only one more affirmation required to 'seal the deal' so to speak. If you missed those opportunities to refuse the contract you had better be very careful how you answer whatever question comes next!!

If on the other hand it is in fact the same process being carried out in both jurisdictions then the claim made in that video is poetic license at best or to use the Aussie vernacular, pure bull****. Either way such unqualified information is not helpful to those new to all of this. As always caveat emptor (buyer beware).

As noted elsewhere part of the bail conditions as such are that Santos refrains from commenting on social media. If 'Talk-back Radio' can be construed as social media he needs to be a bit careful around that so we may not here him in full flight on the issue for a little while yet.

If anyone is able to post the 'Hit' pieces done by our local mejia I'm sure, when compared to the vids above, it would give us all an abject lesson in control of public opinion.

As an aside for any Aussies you know who sat and lapped up the Schapelle Corby stuff recently shown two nights in a row be sure to point them at this (http://www.expendable.tv/p/view-expendable.html) for the rest of the story.

cheers

[jackovesk]

SANTOS BONACCI SPEAKS AFTER COURT - EXPOSES ENTIRE LEGAL FRAUD TO NEWS

Published on Feb 10, 2014

Very few have had the opportunity to speak with such depth to the open public, Santos is for sure a pioneer in the next level of human emancipation.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pfrTb2GUeOw&feature=player_embedded

PS - Extremely (Powerful) stuff Santos...:clap2:

Well worth watching and more importantly (Listening) to again...:yes4:

https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci
http://www.resistance2010.com

[gripreaper]

Here is another case to follow, where Dean REFUSES to post bail. This is an important point, as Santos "SIGNED" the paperwork, although he signed it VC and claims it is invalid, we shall see. Also, it is still unclear (to me) how a municipality can or would post bail.

Dean has been incarcerated for almost 90 days now (November 24th). Here is the latest update.

There hasn’t been an update from Dean in a while with exception to the times when he got to speak to his brother in which has been mostly talking about more logistical happenings in terms of court filings.

A lot of interesting things has been going on and what has been filed and in result, administrative processes, demands to show cause filed into the court and have been completely ignored.

He is the plaintiff in a counter law suit in Queens Bench, also he is the plaintiff in a law suit that has been filed in Federal court and is being heard this coming Monday.

It is all going to be very nasty in which he intends on releasing all the results publicly as soon as all is said and done as everything they have done has been completely intentional.

He refuses to make application for Bail and has refused Bail on every occasion it was offered. He is adamant that he is going to stay where he is and fight this until it’s done once and for all.[emphasis mine]

He has filed into the courts all sorts of paperwork including administrative processes for a demand to show cause, basically for his accuser to prove up a claim, to prove a loss, to show cause and to prove standing.

A cause of action in any way which would basically give rise to a claim in some way or form. A maxim of law being:

Actio non datur non damnificato. An action is not given to him who has received no damages.

http://deanclifford.info/2014/02/12/update-brandon/

Please send Dean a card, and write a letter to the municipality that is retaining him. Let them know you are watching and don't agree.

[naste.de.lumina]

Please send Dean a card, and write a letter to the municipality that is retaining him. Let them know you are watching and don't agree.

Message posted for Dean.
A lot of courage on his part for fight against pimps, in the 'pimps paradise'.

Thanks for keeping us informed gripreaper.

Naste.

[gripreaper]

Wednesday Santos goes before the magistrate. Let us draw strength from Dean Clifford and hold Santos in the highest and purest energy.

From Dean's page at http://deanclifford.info/2014/04/01/supporters-message/

Posted by Admin on Apr 1, 2014 in News |


In this world there are many folks who sit idly by, and then there are those who will not, and cannot, sit idly by, while they see the planet and people they love being crushed and destroyed, on a daily basis, by unbridled filth and corruption at a staggering level.

Dean Clifford is a man who cannot and will not sit idly by while the world around him is being systematically decimated by filth and corruption – filth and corruption that appears to be embedded in all levels of society.

Clifford cannot idly sit by while mankind and nature are being methodically attacked by: geo-engineering, toxins, chemtrails, false medicines, poisoned drinking water, false wars, altered produce, harmful police officers, raping clergy, false-flag operations, and corrupt judicial systems and statutes (to name a few things).

Upon noticing the filth and corruption, Clifford set forth to investigate the nature of the filth and corruption and he sought to find some possible remedies to this distressing aspect of life on Earth, and what he discovered through his journey was profound.

Dean Clifford, a working man, a contractor from Manitoba, Canada, discovered a vitally important truth and that truth is: all men are equal before the law.

Men and women are all equal before the law because they have rights, rights that no one can bestow upon them or take away from them. These rights are not given to people by various pieces of legislation (statutes), but these rights are acknowledged by statues.

Mankind has natural rights and has had them long before the term civil rights was ever conjured up.

Clifford felt the need to tell others in his social network about these rights, and about some possible ways to assert these rights when the rights of man are being trampled and trespassed upon by others (trespassers).

It so happened, a few years back, that someone in the audience recorded some of Clifford’s talks about rights, courts, and trust law, and then uploaded the talks on Youtube, and since that time many requests for talks and seminars have been made of Clifford and so he had accepted to do some seminars in the past few years, as an attempt to meet the requests coming in.

Clifford does not relish being in the spot-light, nor does he like to be called a guru, and he would much rather live a simple life where he could sit beside a river, fish, and help others in a discrete fashion.

However, Clifford realized the severe lack of knowledge in people about natural rights, law, assertion of rights and remedy, and so that is why he agreed to step into the spot-light, for the time being, in an effort to teach others about their natural rights and how to assert them.

There has been much speculation, gossip, lies, and slander spread by some folks on the internet about what Dean Clifford is and is not, but these untruths can only be spread so far – weak minds will be infected almost immediately by the deception and lies, however, the reasonable and logical minds, which are tuned into the frequency of truth and honor, will escape the mind-infection of the outright lies and propaganda, for they are immune to it.

Dean Clifford is not a rich man and he is not a perfect man, but Dean Clifford is a man of courage and he fights for the rights of all men and he is teaching his fellow man to assert their rights and to live in honor and to take responsibility for all their words and deeds – to become fully liable for all they do.

Currently, Clifford is behind bars, and he is fighting the good fight and accepting full responsibility and liability for all he does – all the while the aggressors and slanderers take advantage of the situation to try to create a force of disinformation so large against Clifford in an effort to isolate him from the people who could learn a great deal from what he has to say.

But, this effort is an effort in vain, for those ready to hear the truth will instantly know it when they hear it from Dean – for there is a power in truth, raw, immutable, and unstoppable and it comes from an unseen force of unthinkable magnitude and it will serve to light the fire within in all the truth-seekers and will ultimately shed incredible light on all the filthy, corrupt, entities on this once beautiful planet and will bring to light all the atrocities they have done.

The truth will set mankind free – it is born of a force unmatched in power and it cannot and will not be stopped!

by: Suzanne from Toronto

+++++++++++++

Update: Not much to update other than there was a bail hearing on the 25th March which was uneventful and was denied. The crown and the judiciary are playing a lot of games, filings are disappearing and not being heard. Their corruption is so blatant and doing everything they can to prevent a show cause hearing. Dean is good mentally and physically, he feels that they should not be able to play their bull**** games for much longer, as the application to show cause is being filed in Queens bench either today or tomorrow. Upon his release, which will hopefully be in the next few weeks, there are plans in place that will bring this movement forward even further than before.

http://deanclifford.info/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/hamilton_part7-640x320.png

Please keep Dean in you thoughts. It's now been four months in solitary confinement without a "show cause" hearing or any charges.

[naste.de.lumina]

If I'm not mistaken the Santos Bonacci audience in australia is also April 1, 2014.

This hearing date seems premeditated joke.

[Daphne]

https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci/posts/482028908565023

santos posted on Facebook today in the above link. Case was adjourned until July! but positive adjustments were made to his charges

[gripreaper]

Santos wrote on his facebook page:


In the mean time It will be settled with a promissory note! We got on the national news again and interestingly they allowed me to explain how we are going to discharge the debt with a promissory note!!! I imagine thousands of Australians are researching promissory notes today!!!

A Promissory Note? What is a promissory Note? A Promissory Note is a “promise to pay”, and this promise is the basis for all fiat debt monetary systems. It is how money is created and enters commerce, generally by governments who issue these promises to the Federal Reserve, backed by “the full faith and credit” of the people, and the Fed issues “promissory notes” to the government in exchange for this promise.

So, as long as we agree to this promise and we continue to perpetuate this ponzi scheme by continuing to “pay”, the fiat debt system continues to function and we think that everything is okay. We all do it. The obvious (but seldom recognized) point is that currency in a debt-based monetary system is made of debt (promises to pay) rather than tangible assets like gold or silver.

So, what is happening is the money supply increases with more promises, and therefore there is more money supply in circulation by creating more debt. If the courts say you owe a debt, how can you pay a debt with debt?

There really are only two ways to facilitate an obligation, either create a promise and increase the money supply and an obligation to the public, or remove already existing debt instruments and reduce the money supply through discharge and eliminate the obligation to the public.

So, you don’t really discharge a debt by writing a promissory note. You create more debt. Several years ago in the sovereignty and patriot movements, many were writing promissory notes on mortgage obligations in foreclosure and in court cases, and (if my memory serves me) they were not accepted as only Federally Chartered Central Banks have the authority to accept promissory notes as negotiable instruments and deposit them as drafts and issue currency.

Yet, this is where it gets mucky. Since the promise to pay is created by your signature on a promissory note, (like when you enter a contract to buy a house) this makes you the creditor. You are the issuer and the grantor, and you also agree to be the debtor. So, how can you be the creditor and the debtor in a transaction at the same time?

This is the bind which the court finds itself in when one recognizes how the fiat system works and how the state as the plaintiff, and the person (in this case Santos) as the defendant, are both standing on both sides of the alleged obligation, which does not truly exist. The court wants Santos to be the nexus between the corporate trust in his name and express the trust, which would then send the existing debt instruments he agrees to give them, through their coffers, while Santos is (presumably) arguing that it is impossible to pay a debt with debt, and is exercising his executor status and agreeing to either eliminate those debt instruments through discharge or agreeing to create additional debt instruments through a promissory note.

I would surmise this is why the magistrate adjourned the court until July. This is what courts do when they get caught in their schemes and can’t proceed as usual and force the obligation into the trust. I’d venture to guess that the court will not accept a promissory note as this would expose the whole ponzi and set a precedent in all courts, and I doubt they will allow the discharge either, as this reduces the money supply and the court ends up having to pay the bond.

Same thing is happening with Rod Class tomorrow in DC. So, follow his case as well.

https://scontent-b-sea.xx.fbcdn.net/hphotos-ash3/t31.0-8/p235x350/1973411_279328225563961_1084392051466384742_o.jpg

[pbsluvr]

I happened on to Dean Clifford's talks on youtube about a year ago, found them very compelling and further revealing the deceptions, and was hailing him as a hero for people. Then, he gave a series of educational how-to talks on a blogtalk site (I forget which one), but these were removed by the host citing some kind of dishonesty and on Dean's part. Because I thought the host was "a good guy", I dropped Dean from any further consideration.

I have to reverted to my original opinion of him because of the issues he is enduring now.
It is amazing to me how skillful the trolls and paid disinfo guys really are! Thanks go to all the Avalonians who bring information into the open.

Dean, Santos, Rod and all living beings are in my prayers.

[pbsluvr]

I thought I would mention this other idea I came across and it ties in to Dean's suggestion of referring to oneself as Man(or Woman) and not as a Human.

The first is clear. The second refers to a language I am not familiar with.
1. Hue(man): a shade or shadow of the original, an abstraction of Man
2. Hu (man) : Hu being a term for a sheep hence the term sheople.

Just ramblings here.

[Ahnung-quay]

I just read Judge Dale's Great American Adventure. All you have to personally do to claim your trust is to go through a few legal maneuvers with your birth certificate and its Cusip number listed as your assets in bankruptcy court? These are the global collateral trust accounts that everybody on the planet is struggling to have released. What are we all waiting for?

[Daphne]

I thought I would mention this other idea I came across and it ties in to Dean's suggestion of referring to oneself as Man(or Woman) and not as a Human.

The first is clear. The second refers to a language I am not familiar with.
1. Hue(man): a shade or shadow of the original, an abstraction of Man
2. Hu (man) : Hu being a term for a sheep hence the term sheople.


Just ramblings here.

What about the Hu as a name of God? As seen in this Hu chant.
http://youtu.be/cpIrDJGVdO0
Or the description below.

http://lovinghu.blogspot.com/

[gripreaper]

All you have to personally do to claim your trust is to go through a few legal maneuvers with your birth certificate and its Cusip number

Sounds simple enough, but getting the CUSIP number on your "Live Birth" bond is not as easy as judge Dale makes it sound. First off, no one other than the top CFO's of the top central banks have access to Federal Reserve database of the CUSIP accounts of origination when the original birth document was delivered to the Dept of Commerce and a bond was created for the Federal Reserve line of credit. So, it's not really a collateral account, it's more like a line of credit based on the assumed lifetime value of the chattel (cattle) which you are.

The birth certificate is just that, a certification that an original live birth document exists, is held by the government as surety against the credit line of the United States, when we were all pledged as collateral for the bankruptcy of 1933.

The original bankruptcy of 1861 after the civil war and the "Reconstruction Act" which created a new class of citizens (indentured slaves of all of us, not just the blacks) and the tangibles were forfeited (land and resources) and the suspension of the organic United States and the take over by the new Corporate UNITED STATES in the 10 mile District of Columbia, a separate foreign territory.

Most people have no idea of our history and how we were sold out a long time ago.

[GuyFox]

I just read Judge Dale's Great American Adventure. All you have to personally do to claim your trust is to go through a few legal maneuvers with your birth certificate and its Cusip number listed as your assets in bankruptcy court? These are the global collateral trust accounts that everybody on the planet is struggling to have released. What are we all waiting for?

Those accounts are a silly fantasy.

Along with it go other silly fantasies:

+ That banks create money from thin air, and THEREFORE banks get their money for Free, and do not need to pay it back
+ That Trillions or Quadrillions worth of assets, are just sitting in Collateral Accounts, waiting for us to claim them, or the time to be right for them to be handed out

Problem is. This is not true.

Look into these matters, and do a bit of genuine research, and it all falls apart

Example: Where is Mr Sino's Money

emHsHtqjTek

[Sunny-side-up]

More update of Santos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN1iKfSfihw

Good on ya bro ;)

[Eram]

More update of Santos

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sN1iKfSfihw

Good on ya bro ;)

It's very interesting to see Santos at work here, fighting the system.
I don't understand more then half of what he says though.
At first glance, it appears to be some sort of game of semantics almost. A "person" versus a "living man".

I agree with him when he says that the reserve money is fraudulent and if the toll payments are really only going into the hands of one family and don't benefit the roads or the government, that is fraudulent and immoral as well.
Very good to see someone brave enough to stand up to that.

Buuuut.... it seems to me that he advocates some sort of anarchistic society and that is something that I find difficult to picture.
I understand that a lot a rules that society operate under are insane when you take them apart and put them under a microscope, but how is a society to survive if you take away all the rules?
I think the whole system comes crashing down in an instance when you do that.
Most people that are alive today don't have the consciousness to be able to live a productive and healthy live under those circumstances.
In no time, the rule of the jungle will emerge and total chaos will be our living grounds.

maybe I'm exaggerating Santos's intentions and he has a deeper view on how things should be, but at first, this seems to me what he is trying to steer to.

[aheb]

That's great thanks.I was just wondering though is this how the illuminati escape punishment for their crimes? I mean Jon Corzine of MF Global was not charged with any offence , is this why? because he used this argument and it was accepted by the courts, because of who he is?

[Ahnung-quay]

No, I don't believe that the accounts are a fantasy. They are there as I've seen documentation of them with signatures. However, the fantasy is that they can be backed with anything substantial other than petrodollars which we all know are fiat debt instruments. From what I understand, the only potential backers on the planet are the big western banks or the Asians primarily the Chinese.

Besides, I have declared bankruptcy once; a procedure I don't want to go through again in their Maritime court system. I was being flip in my comment above in order to get people talking.

I'm thinking that the petrodollar will fall and we will all be in for some hard times in the U.S. Eventually, claiming our individual sovereignty (peacefully) may be our only option. There may be other options as we go. What happens depends on us navigating the future circumstances in a way that strives to bring the Babylonian system down while ensuring that all of Earth's humanity benefit. The organic constitution should be returned to the people, not just to the people of the U.S. but, to the people of the world.

Does the land matter? Not really, because we are really just tenants here even if we think that we can own it. From what I understand all of the powers that are presently struggling for control would have us in the same master/slave relationship that we are in now. Can humanity rise above it all and unite is the real question?

First and foremost, we need to stay out of victim mentality and stay connected to Creator. I'm indignant (past shock, mourning, and anger) about our true history because of the lies that we've been told and because I know inside myself that I'm a sovereign being no matter what their pieces of paper may say (as we all are).

As I understand it, we were called hu-mans because we were created in the image of Creator, Hu being an ancient name for Creator. This is not Creator's physical image but, an image of the Supreme consciousness. Our consciousness and how we direct it is the key here.

[Maia Gabrial]

Santos Bonacci beat the court at its game again at the beginning of April. Because he knows how the game is played. For anyone who's interested in how to understand how the system works better, check out Dean Clifford's videos. He gained his knowledge through experience. And even Santos admits the man knows more than him.

[eaglespirit]

Santos is and will do well for humanity, imho!

As many of you have stated we are intensely and deeply embedded in a system by mischievous way and means...and if it were to come crashing down there would be chaos to follow.

Well...I have a bit more faith in the human spirit and that we would simply help one another right in front of us in our own lives and many people would continue to do what they do to provide food and services needed to keep moving forward, regardless of the logic that we would lose all momentum and access because the monetary system keeps it afloat and would disappear, as we know it...
it would be an above ground underground movement that would blossom...
a loving giving source(us and higher Creator us) that is never ending.

It has happened in war time...we do not need wars and crisis to allow it to flourish if we live it in our own lives.

We have everything we really need in front of us on earth...
all we have to do is live in love actively.
I know this sounds dreamy and idealistic to many of you...

but I also know that many of you have experienced this in some way in your lives,
as have I.
I truly feel we are on the verge of doing this on a , well, full time basis...it CAN be done, because we have already done it in small ways in our lives...we simply grow up spiritually and step it all up.

The military and police state and the courts and the hospitals and the government and the, and the... would conform to this new full-time giving spectrum of correction...and it is already happening, imho.

Just keep doing what we're doing with one spiritual foot in the new flowing waters.

I'm done...had to put it out there again!

[Sunny-side-up]

Santos is and will do well for humanity, imho!

As many of you have stated we are intensely and deeply embedded in a system by mischievous way and means...and if it were to come crashing down there would be chaos to follow.

Well...I have a bit more faith in the human spirit and that we would simply help one another right in front of us in our own lives and many people would continue to do what they do to provide food and services needed to keep moving forward, regardless of the logic that we would lose all momentum and access because the monetary system keeps it afloat and would disappear, as we know it...
it would be an above ground underground movement that would blossom...
a loving giving source(us and higher Creator us) that is never ending.

It has happened in war time...we do not need wars and crisis to allow it to flourish if we live it in our own lives.

We have everything we really need in front of us on earth...
all we have to do is live in love actively.
I know this sounds dreamy and idealistic to many of you...

but I also know that many of you have experienced this in some way in your lives,
as have I.
I truly feel we are on the verge of doing this on a , well, full time basis...it CAN be done, because we have already done it in small ways in our lives...we simply grow up spiritually and step it all up.

The military and police state and the courts and the hospitals and the government and the, and the... would conform to this new full-time giving spectrum of correction...and it is already happening, imho.

Just keep doing what we're doing with one spiritual foot in the new flowing waters.

I'm done...had to put it out there again!

Bump:

Yes eaglespirit I totally agree, keep the vib's buzzing.

All part of the change that is coming, that has to come, that will be done.

Why should those PTW get away with their crimes any longer, better to have a Good honest struggle in the coming years than to be the PTW slaves/cash machines that we've been! Not to mention the: Genie-pigs, crash-test-dummy's and cannon-fodder that we have also been!

[Eram]

9plu2MNiqrY

I just watched this video to try and understand a lite bit what this is all about.

Very interesting stuff. How all is being tied back to ancient Rome and the birth of the Roman Catholic Church.
I will definitely study this more and deeper because it is so revealing to begin to see the mechanisms and purposes that are at work behind the system.

The part where our birth registers are being used as bonds on the New York Stock exchange (or something similar).
Is somebody here able to explain this here in more detail and in simple words? Gripreaper perhaps?

How does our birth certificate act as a bond, worth millions of dollars and how does it effect our daily lives?

[ponda]

Some people might find this YT audio interesting.Santos is mentioned at the end.It comes from this link (http://omnithought.org/united-states-political-court-system-exposed-how-nwo-enslaves-society/939#)

Court system exposed

xukkou30xWk

[gripreaper]

The full story, very well done. Please listen to this 26 minute overview


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=MWaYAPheGLA&feature=youtu.be

1913 to 1921 (exact date unknown): Colonel Edward Mandel House to Woodrow Wilson found in Wilson’s personal diary/logs

“Very soon, every American will be required to register their biological property (that's you and your children) in a national system designed to keep track of the people and that will operate under the ancient system of pledging. By such methodology, we can compel people to submit to our agenda, which will affect our security as a charge back for our fiat paper currency. Every American will be forced to register or suffer being able to work and earn a living. They will be our chattels (property) and we will hold the security interest over them forever, by operation of the law merchant under the scheme of secured transactions. Americans, by unknowingly or unwittingly delivering the bills of lading (Birth Certificate) to us will be rendered bankrupt and insolvent, secured by their pledges. They will be stripped of their rights and given a commercial value designed to make us a profit and they will be none the wiser, for not one man in a million could ever figure our plans and, if by accident one or two should figure it out, we have in our arsenal plausible deniability. After all, this is the only logical way to fund government, by floating liens and debts to the registrants in the form of benefits and privileges. This will inevitably reap us huge profits beyond our wildest expectations and leave every American a contributor to this fraud, which we will call "Social Insurance." Without realizing it, every American will unknowingly be our servant, however begrudgingly. The people will become helpless and without any hope for their redemption and we will employ the high office (presidency) of our dummy corporation (USA) to foment this plot against America."

And here, starting at the 58 minute mark, Sean David Morton tells us how to do a bond.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=2D7mjnVO4C4

So remember, we need to "over-stand" that we are living and our energy has been absconded to fund the bankruptcy of a private corporation know as the UNITED STATES and, through joinder, which gives the private corporation jurisdiction as YOU become the "citizen-SHIP" upon which this pirate embarks and probates the estate of the DEAD person.

Stop doing that.

[Mike]

You need to write a book, Grip. Seriously. Your knowledge is second to none when it comes to this stuff.

[snoop4truth]

Dear GuyFox,

Ditto!!!

Further, "Judge DALE" is a hoax. All of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to "Judge DALE" are also hoaxes (including the "Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" above). The people behind the hoax have already admitted it. This is the reason that you have never actually seen a photo, video or live appearance of "Judge DALE". He does not exist.

The REAL author of ALL of the "Judge DALE forgeries" (including "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" above) is actually "Rodney DALE Class" (Rod Class), an amateur legal theorist who barely got through high school and who was NEVER a judge anywhere anytime. The FAKE online character "Judge DALE" was named after "Rodney DALE Class'" middle name (DALE) as an inside joke.

Do not get fooled by the "Judge DALE Hoax" or by the FAKE claims about the law appearing in any of the "Judge DALE forgeries". Without exception they ARE LIES.

[snoop4truth]

"Judge DALE" (the author of the document to which you refer) is a hoax. Look it up. All of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to "Judge DALE' are also hoaxes. All of the claims made in in all of the "Judge DALE forgeries" are hoaxes. Everything about "Judge DALE", the "Judge DALE forgeries" and their contents IS FAKE.

[giovonni]

Syncretism ...
(https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syncretism)
What's the Solution? Syncretist Santos Bonacci



Uploaded by friend Ancient Wisdom https://www.facebook.com/Ancient-Wisdom-1618775878399017

Santo's Facebook
https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci
https://www.facebook.com/Santos-Bonacci-268376373249800

Get Santo's Syncretism Videos & Syncretism
Graphics http://www.universaltruthschool.com/

Santo's Music http://www.santos.net.au/

Make a donation: http://videos.universaltruthschool.com/make-a-donation/

Published on Oct 7, 2015


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vn4Gwb8rCWI&feature=em-uploademail

[Akasha]

So what actually happened to Santos in the end? Did he manage to successfully create his $130 000 promissory note and have it received by the court? Anyone out there who knows him personally who can comment? I love the guy and would like to know he's ok.

[giovonni]

So what actually happened to Santos in the end? Did he manage to successfully create his $130 000 promissory note and have it received by the court? Anyone out there who knows him personally who can comment? I love the guy and would like to know he's ok.

From his facebook page (https://www.facebook.com/santos.bonacci)


Santos Bonacci
October 5 at 8:42pm

Dear friends, a big heartfelt thank you to all the beautiful kind hearted people out there supporting me and sending good energy and well wishes while i was in jail for 7 weeks, been out since the 22nd of September, since then i have just been detoxing and healing from all the poor quality food, mental, emotional and spiritual pollution from jail, and getting back to reasonable health. I think i still need a few more weeks, after which i hope to be active in Syncretism as much as i can. I have had lots of incredible support and help which has really helped me to cope and stay strong and focused for which i am very thankful.

I have lots to share from my experience and i think i prefer to use internet radio to do so, so i will be releasing information and new material in the near future.

This Facebook page will be dedicated to Syncretism so i will not be the only one posting here, you may have noticed in the past year or so that other friends have been posting here as well.

I wont be using Facebook regularly or as much as others do since i don't at all appreciate how it is used against us and our freedoms by weak minded materialists who serve the beast and follow orders because they are of low soul evolution. Their reward will be according to their deeds, they will not escape this universal law, all in good time! In the meantime lets use this media to publish truth and expose falsehood. As for us truthers on the path to eternal glory, NEVER be discouraged, we will prevail, as truth and love are forever. Do not fail truth or love in all your deeds and a glorious eternal future is guaranteed.

We are on the verge of great things on planet Earth as many are awakening on many levels, i am confident of this. As we correct what is deficient in our selves so the world around us will improve, 'as above so below, as within so without' this law is infallible!

Looking forward to sharing great new stuff in the near future

Omnia Vincit Veritas

Santos.

[Omni]

I have Santos on skype, he responds regularly(despite having over 1,000 contacts). He's usually in very good spirits, I really like him. :)

[snoop4truth]

RODNEY "DALE" CLASS ("ROD CLASS") IS "JUDGE DALE".

“Judge DALE” is a hoax. This is the reason that you have never seen a photograph, video or live appearance of “Judge DALE”. He does not exist.

There are actually two different people who have fraudulently impersonated "Judge DALE" online and they write about two entirely different subjects.

"Rodney DALE Class" is the original "Judge DALE" (which uses his middle name, "DALE", as an inside joke). Class and his “editors” first began fraudulently impersonating the “Judge DALE”, a fake “retired federal judge” in 2009 (a federal felony).

All of the fake “Judge DALE” articles that appear online on the subject of the “LAW” were written by Class and his "editors". All of the fake online articles that appear online on the subject of “DINARS” were written by the late John MacHaffie, who died on January 8th, 2015.

Here is how it there came to be two fake “Judge DALES”. Between 2010 and 2012, the original people who actually created the "Judge DALE Hoax" ("editors") organized and edited Class' amateur belief system about “the law” into the two original "Judge DALE" forgeries: "The Matrix And The US Constitution" (April 10th, 2010) and "The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America" (sometime before May 25th, 2012). These “editors” posted these two original “Judge DALE” forgeries on their own websites.

Afterwards, these "editors" solicited other likeminded webmasters who would agree to post (or to post links to) these two original "Judge DALE" forgeries on their own websites with full knowledge that these forgeries were fake. These likeminded webmasters played an important role in the “Judge DALE Hoax”. Indeed, two of these webmasters were so enthusiastic about their role in the hoax that they themselves actually wrote and posted additional fake articles online in which they claimed to “know Judge DALE personally” and wherein they purported to quote dialogue that they exchanged with this fictional character (who does not actually exist).

Arguably, the most important of the likeminded webmasters who distributed the “Judge DALE” forgeries was the late John MacHaffie of nesaranews.com. MacHaffie posted articles on his own website on a broad range of subjects. But, he was passionate about the subject of "DINARS" (a gold-backed currency used in some middle-eastern countries) and related subjects like global currency re-set/revaluation and non-disclosure agreements (which MacHaffie claimed were necessary when investing in "DINARS") . Many people regarded MacHaffie as a genuine authority on the subject of "DINARS" and he had followers reading his “DINAR” articles all over the globe. MacHaffie did not write about the subject of the law. And, Class did not write about the subject of “DINARS”. So, Class and MacHaffie were not competitors for the same readers. Thus, Class’s material and MacHaffie’s material were compatible and Class’ material seemed to be a good fit on MacHaffie’s website, nesaranews.com.

At first, all went well with the "Judge DALE Hoax". Readers of the "Judge DALE” forgeries on the websites of these like-minded webmasters actually believed that "Judge DALE" was a real person and that he really was a "retired federal judge". Readers of the “Judge DALE forgeries" believed the false claims reflected therein about “the law” and the legal system. And, nobody outside of the “editors” who originally created the “Judge DALE” forgeries and the likeminded webmasters (who distributed the forgeries) knew that the whole thing was one giant hoax intended to defraud the American people.

By 2012, the "Judge DALE Hoax" had become an unqualified success. The fictional character, "Judge DALE", had become a genuine brand-name with real value among amateur legal theorists, largely as a result of the efforts of these likeminded webmasters, like MacHaffie (who distributed the "Judge DALE forgeries" to his own readers).

But then, in late May or very early June, 2012, the "editors" who originally created the "Judge DALE Hoax" stole some proprietary information from MacHaffie about “DINARS”, posted it on the websites of MacHaffie's competitors and fraudulently attributed that stolen information information to "Judge DALE" (took credit for that stolen information themselves).

Needless to say, when MacHaffie found out, was livid. In retaliation, on June 4th and 5th, 2012, MacHaffie did two things. First, he posted a formal notice on his website, nesaranews.com, that read, "Judge DALE Is Removed From This Blog" and, without revealing that "Judge DALE" was a hoax, he explained his reasons for banning "Judge DALE" from his website (the theft explained above).
JUDGE DALE IS REMOVED FROM THIS BLOG

Second, and more importantly, MacHaffie actually stole the fake name, "Judge DALE", for his own use in peddling his own online articles about "DINARS" and he posted his very first "DINAR" article online as a SECOND "Judge DALE". MacHaffie's theft and use of the fake name, "Judge DALE", served several purposes for MacHaffie. First, it taught Class' editors a lesson about stealing the intellectual property that actually belonged to others (he simply returned the favor by doing the same thing to them). MacHaffie knew that Class' editors could not complain publically about what MacHaffie had done to them without revealing their own role in the "Judge DALE Hoax". Second, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, had the effect of confusing and confounding "Judge DALE's" original followers and thereby weakened the value of the "Judge DALE" brand among amateur legal theorists.

Third, MacHaffie’s theft and use of the fake name, “Judge DALE”, increased the number of readers of MacHaffie's articles on "DINARS". MacHaffie continued to use the fake name "Judge DALE" in connection with his own online articles on the subject of "DINARS" until his death on January 8th, 2015. He never forgave Class' editors for what they had done to him.

This is why since June 4th, 2012, there have been TWO AUTHORS of the online forgeries that have been fraudulently attributed to "Judge DALE", not one. This is also why there are no "Judge DALE" forgeries that were posted online which relate to the subject of "DINARS" until after June 4th, 2012. This is also why, since June 4th, 2012, the "Judge DALE" forgeries posted online address two entirely unrelated subjects (the subject of the LAW and the subject of "DINARS"). This also explains why "Judge DALE", an alleged "retired federal judge" would, on June 4th, 2012, inexplicably start writing articles about “DINARS”, a subject about which no real “retired federal judge” would have any interest, knowledge or expertise anyway. This also explains why there is such a profound difference in the quality of the writing between the two types of "Judge DALE" forgeries that appear online. Those "Judge DALE forgeries" on the subject of the LAW which appear to have been written by a high school student (as edited by other high school students) were written by Class and his editors. Those "Judge DALE forgeries" on the subject of "DINARS" (global currency re-set/re-valuation and NDA's) that appear to have been written by an intelligent, articulate, educated, literate person were written by the late "John MacHaffie. This is why no new “Judge DALE forgeries" on the subject of “DINARS” have been posted online since MacHaffie’s death on January 8th, 2015. Finally, this is why new “Judge DALE forgeries" on the subject of the LAW continue to be posted online despite MacHaffie’s death (Class and his “editors” remain alive to post new “Judge DALE forgeries" online about the subject of the LAW).

Either way, there is no real "retired federal judge" who wrote any of the "Judge DALE” forgeries" that appear online. Either way, "Rodney DALE Class" was the original "Judge DALE" and was the namesake for the fictional online character, "Judge DALE" (which uses Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). Either way, "Judge DALE" is a hoax. Either way, all of the online articles that are fraudulently attributed to "Judge DALE" are also hoaxes.

In sum, Rodney DALE Class has been "Judge DALE" from 2009 until the present (EIGHT years) and John MacHaffie was A SECOND "Judge Dale" from June 4th, 2012 until his death on January 8th, 2015 (TWO and a half years).

SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rodney "DALE" Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day.

[snoop4truth]

ROD CLASS, THE "DEBRA JONES HOAX" & THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX"

FIRST, SEE LINKS HERE: https://jhaines6.wordpress.com/2014/07/10/rod-class-a-former-policewomanattorney-reveals-what-it-is-like-inside-thanks-to-j/ . http://www.talkshoe.com/talkshoe/web/talkCast.jsp?masterId=48361&pageNumber=7&pageSize=15 (Click on Episode 869 dated 07-08-2014.).

ROD CLASS:
Class is a functionally-illiterate amateur legal theorist with barely a high school education, a history of PSYCHIATRIC PROBLEMS and a record of LOSING EVERY SINGLE ADMINISTRATIVE AND JUDICIAL CASE IN WHICH HE HAS EVER BEEN INVOLVED (MORE THAN 73 CONSECUTIVE LOSSES IN A ROW AND STILL COUNTING). In addition, Class is a TWICE-CONVICTED, weapons-related, CONVICTED FELON (possessing in his car an illegally-sawed-off, fully-loaded, Springfield shotgun, two night sticks outfitted with concealed razor blades, one fully-loaded rifle, three fully-loaded handguns, one of which was illegally unsecured and positioned between the front seats for quick and easy access, several hundred more rounds of ammunition for all four firearms on-board, one large machete on the driver’s side door for easy access, fourteen large knives and daggers of varying size and lethal effect, one illegal spring-deployed switch blade knife, three axes of various sizes and packages of concealed razor-type blades found beneath his clothing when frisked, etc.).

But, more importantly, Class is a NOTORIOUS PROFESSIONAL HOAXER AND CHARLATAN who is behind the “Judge DALE Hoax”, the” BOMBSHELL: FOURTH Administrative Ruling Hoax”, the “Property Into Other People’s Names Hoax”, the “Court Registry Investment System Hoax” and numerous other legal hoaxes, all of which he uses to “TRICK” his own followers into believing his intentionally false claims about the law and the legal system.

Class has his own internet radio show on AIB Talkshoe Radio (which broadcasts a pre-recorded "CONFERENCE CALL"). http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/11/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and.html. On this show, Class makes intentionally FALSE and FRAUDULENT claims about the law and the legal system to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We The People" and their appointees. On his show, Class advocates suing these people and their agencies for doing their jobs. For jurisdictional reasons, Class recommends suing them in administrative court using the "ADMINISTRATIVE PROCESS". http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/01/judge-dale-on-ucc-filings-and-further.html .

DEBRA JONES HOAX:
On July 8, 2014, in Episode 869, Class purported to bring in a "LEGAL INSIDER" as a guest on his radio show and introduced her as "former attorney" and "former law enforcement officer", "Debra Jones’’. (See links at very top.).

Not surprisingly, during this 2 hour 43 minute show, Jones made the same utterly delusional claims about the law and the legal system that Class himself makes. But, Jones also claimed that: 1). as a “former police woman”, she and her fellow officers did nothing but intentionally break the law to harm the public; and that 2). as a “former attorney”, she, the judges, the prosecutors and her fellow attorneys did nothing but intentionally break the law to harm the public. (See links at very top.).

Class’ radio audience was understandably SHOCKED and HORRIFIED by the claims of Jones whom they genuinely believed was a REAL "legal insider" who was actually telling them the TRUTH. This radio show became an internet sensation, much to the delight of Class and Jones (because it successfully incited the hatred and violence that is was intended to incite).

THE TRUTH:
There was only one problem. THE WHOLE THING WAS ONE BIG HOAX. Before putting her on his internet radio show, Class already knew that Jones WAS NOT a “legal insider”, WAS NOT a "former attorney" and WAS NOT a "former law enforcement officer". In fact, Class already knew that Jones was EVERY BIT THE FRAUD AND CHARLATAN THAT HE WAS.

ABOUT JONES:
1. Jones’ REAL name is "Debra Jenks Jones";
2. Jones is 50 years old;
3. Jones lives in Puyallup, Pierce County, Washington State. This is why many of her seminars are conveniently held in nearby Yelp, Washington State;
4. Jones HAS NEVER HAD a professional license of ANY TYPE from ANY STATE (which means that she was NEVER an attorney). This is why Jones will not reveal the name of the law school that she allegedly attended or the state(s) that allegedly issued her a law license;
5. Jones was NEVER a "law enforcement officer". This is why Jones will not reveal the name and location of the law enforcement agency/ies at which she was allegedly so employed;
6. Jones STILL solicits and collects money from her victims for seminars by FRAUDULENTLY claiming to be a "former police officer" and a former "police woman". http://protrustacademy.com/

NOTE:
It is a STATE crime to impersonate an "attorney" or a "law enforcement officer”. It is a FEDERAL FELONY to use a "means of interstate commerce" (like the internet) to commit fraud (like soliciting money for seminars by fraudulently claiming to be a "former attorney", "former police officer" or by fraudulently claiming to be "Private Attorney General" who can "train" others to become the same). http://nesaranews.blogspot.com/2015/06/rod-class-live-call-tonight-tues-jun-23.html. Victims who have paid for such seminars may recover THREE TIMES their money back under FEDERAL RICO.

JUDGE DALE HOAX:
Rodney "DALE" Class and two other NOTORIOUS PROFESSIONAL HOAXERS AND CHARLATANS distributed FAKE legal books online that revealed FAKE legal information WHICH THEY THEMSELVES ACTUALLY CREATED, but which they fraudulently told the American people were written by a FAKE “retired federal judge” named, “Judge DALE” (which uses Rodney DALE Class’ middle name, “DALE”, as an inside joke). The “Judge DALE forgeries” include: “The Matrix And the US Constitution” (2010), “The Great American Adventure: Secrets Of America” (2012) and “Lawfully Yours” (2014). Most of the other “Judge DALE” articles posted online are mere re-prints of section five of “The Great American Adventure” under different names (“Legal Advice From A Retired Federal Judge Turned Whistle Blower”, “Retired Federal Judge Spills The Beans”, etc.). In the “Judge DALE Forgeries”, Rodney "DALE" Class confirmed his own delusional claims about the law and the legal system while FRAUDULENTLY pretending to be "Judge DALE". Like all of Rod Class’ claims about the law and the legal system, his claims in the “Judge DALE forgeries” were also designed and intended to incite hatred and violence against the ELECTED representatives of "We the People" and their appointees. As hard as it is to believe, Class’ two co-conspirators in this hoax still peddle all three of the “Judge DALE forgeries” from their own personal websites DESPITE THAT EVERYONE KNOWS THEY ARE ENTIRELY FAKE.
http://www.stopthecrime.net/docs/THE-GREAT-AMERICAN-ADVENTURE.pdf . https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2013/11/the-great-american-adventure-sm-book-format_pdf.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/04/the-matrix-and-the-us-constitution-sm-bk-format1.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2014/05/05/the-matrix-and-the-us-constitution/
And, speaking of "MATRIX" hoaxes, for more "MATRIX" hoaxes by the very same charlatans involved here, go to: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=22s (Go to this video FIRST. Then, go to :30-:45 for an ACTUAL PHOTO of THE REAL "Judge DALE" inside the "MATRIX"); http://www.globaltruth.net/jeff-rense-deborah-tavares-escaping-the-matrix/; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sykRuXXNJzU ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HX5IJMevyP8 ; https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k4eRlBbcFkc.
(FORGERIES CONTINUED)
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2015/10/lawfully-yours-ninth-edition.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.files.wordpress.com/2014/08/bond-vs-united-states1.pdf
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/judge-dale/

RELATED DOCUMENTS:
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/rod-class/
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/tag/rodney-dale-class/
https://anticorruptionsociety.com/2013/09/23/our-courts-have-nothing-to-do-with-justice/

OTHERS DIRECTLY INVOLVED IN THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX":
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/11/judge-dale-global-currency-reset-and.html
http://removingtheshackles.blogspot.com/2013/01/judge-dale-on-ucc-filings-and-further.html
http://www.shiftfrequency.com/admiralty-courts-law-of-the-see/#more-26988

CLASS' CO-CONSPIRATORS CAUGHT ON TAPE WHILE ACTUALLY ENGAGED IN THE THE "JUDGE DALE HOAX". (Jeff Rense is NOT involved in the hoax.). Go to the following videos FIRST. Then, go to the times indicated below. They are the exact times of the hoax documented therein.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=05o4CpB9I8g&t=260s (Go to this video FIRST, then go to 2:25-11:35)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JTRPZD3_w5k (Same as above. 42:10-49:15)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=mKI4zPI504E (Same. 3:50-4:30 & 7:15-56:00)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8dgYbD6fcw8 (Same. 34:20-36:30)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JAryrdGenL4 (Same. 1:30-1:45)

Class’ co-conspirators in the “Judge DALE Hoax” are the same two charlatans who assisted Class in ALL OF THE “LEGAL” HOAXES DESCRIBED ABOVE (in the second paragraph). These two charlatans are also behind the “NASA War Document Hoax” and the “Silent Weapons For Quiet Wars Hoax”. For more on these hoaxes, read the comments by snoop4truth posted below the following videos. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_4J7NLlloN0&t=274s
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=z_Bk_YmrK-M&t=3701s

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth did not expose these two hoaxes to harm Rod Class or Debra Jones. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed these two hoaxes solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such INTENTIONAL FRAUD inflicts upon the American people every single day.

[snoop4truth]

ROD CLASS & THE "PRIVATE ATTORNEY GENERAL HOAX"

FIRST, SEE THE HOAX HERE: https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22&biw=1366&bih=622&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwir6YX-5t_OAhVJ2B4KHQQzC_kQ_AUICCgD&dpr=1#tbm=isch&q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22+%22Rod+Class%22&*

THE HOAX: Rod Class falsely claims to be a "Private Attorney General" ("PAG") and that as such, he is EXTREMELY powerful, EXTREMELY important and that he represents an EXTREME threat to government agencies and officials in that imaginary capacity. But, none of this is so.

BACKGROUND: The terms “attorney”, “attorney general”, “judge” and “prosecutor” are all "professional titles" for highly-educated, legal experts in powerful and important public positions. Class wanted to be what these people were. So, he created an appropriate TITLE, COSTUME, VEHICLE and some imaginary POWERS for himself to help him in this regard. For his title, Class picked the term, "PAG" because this term actually appears in the case law (ONLY) and because it would help him create the prestigious IMAGE he wanted.

Class falsely claims that: 1). the term, PAG, is a professional title for a non-attorney who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license; 2). the purpose of the PAG is to “do accountability” against our ELECTED representatives and their appointees for doing their jobs; and that 3). his "authority" as a PAG comes from "Congress" (two federal CIVIL RIGHTS statutes). But, none of this is so.

THE TRUTH:
1). As used in connection with the two federal CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies (and herein), the term, PAG, is a TEMPORARY NICKNAME jokingly used by the federal courts when referring to an ordinary, WINNING civil rights CLIENT who was actually represented by an attorney in WINNING the case. The TEMPORARY NICKNAME, PAG, is NOT a professional title for a FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed "attorney" or "attorney general" who is somehow authorized to practice law without a license.

2). The purpose of a PAG is NOT to "do accountability" against our ELECTED representatives and their appointees for doing their jobs.

3). Class has NO authority from Congress to practice law without a license. Indeed, Congress has NO POWER to authorize any person (including Class) to practice law. Const., Art. 1, Sec. 8 (listing ALL OF THE POWERS of Congress). http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/article-i-section-8 (Note that the power to authorize a person to practice law IS NOT on this tiny list of Congressional powers). Under the tenth amendment, ONLY THE STATES have the power to authorize a person to practice law. http://www.annenbergclassroom.org/page/tenth-amendment .

4). As used in connection with the two federal CIVIL RIGHTS statutes upon which Class relies (and herein), the "concept" of a PAG relates SOLELY to providing PAYMENT to attorneys who WIN cases for CIVIL RIGHTS VICTIMS.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16098434127441351570&q=counsel+%22+successful+plaintiffs%22+attorney+attorneys+discrimination+fee+fees+negroes+racial+%22 civil+rights%22+%22he+does+so%22+%22when+a+plaintiff%22+%22obtains+an+injunction%22+%22as+a+private+ attorney+general%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=3704494267863674576&q=%22he+does+so%22+%22obtains+an+injunction%22+%22when+a+plaintiff%22++black+hispanic+racially+%22as +private+attorneys+general%22+%22civil+rights%22+%22plaintiffs+act%22+%22plaintiff%27s+role%22+%22as +a+private+attorney+general%22+%22the+characterization+of+the+plaintiff%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

5). What a REAL PAG looks like.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22civil+rights%22+victims&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwjp2MH9kubSAhWB1CYKHWXqDjAQ_AUIBygC&biw=1366&bih=613#spf=1.

6). What a FAKE PAG looks like.
https://www.google.com/search?q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22&biw=1366&bih=622&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ved=0ahUKEwir6YX-5t_OAhVJ2B4KHQQzC_kQ_AUICCgD&dpr=1#tbm=isch&q=%22Private+Attorney+General%22+%22Rod+Class%22&* https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8

7). DEFINITION: The term, PAG, is a TEMPORARY NICKNAME jokingly used by the federal courts. A PAG is the actual CLIENT of an attorney who has already WON a federal civil rights lawsuit. Such a PAG must have been the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation and must have been the actual PLAINTIFF in the federal civil rights case. A PAG has NO powers, NO authority and NO importance that any other CLIENT of an attorney does not already have. None.

8). The subject federal civil rights statutes (and the statutes to which they refer) only do two things: a). they permit the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation TO SUE the violator in FEDERAL court; and b). they permit the FEDERAL judge TO AWARD ATTORNEYS FEES to the winning side's attorney. There is nothing in either of the two federal civil rights statutes that authorizes a non-attorney to practice law without a license or to use the TEMPORARY NICKNAME, PAG as if it were a professional title. https://www.law.cornell.edu/uscode/text/42/1988 (See section (b))
https://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/STATUTE-78/pdf/STATUTE-78-Pg241.pdf (See Section 204(b))

9). An attorney IS an attorney IN EVERY sense of the word. But, a PAG IS NOT an attorney IN ANY sense of the word. An attorney represents a party in court. But, A PAG IS A PARTY IN COURT. An attorney represents a client in court. But, A PAG IS A CLIENT IN COURT. An attorney acts on behalf of people WHO ARE IN COURT. But, a PAG acts ONLY on his OWN BEHALF and ONLY on behalf of people WHO ARE OUT OF COURT. A person’s status as an attorney CONTINUES AFTER THE END OF THE CASE. But, a person’s status as a PAG ENDS (FOREVER) AT THE END OF THE CASE.

NO PERSON (including Class) CAN BE A PAG AFTER THE END OF THE CASE in which he/she was the actual VICTIM of the federal civil rights violation, the actual PLAINTIFF in the federal civil rights case and the actual CLIENT of an attorney who actually WON that federal civil rights case.

10). ORIGIN: A REAL governmental "Attorney General" WINS civil rights lawsuits which benefits society as a whole. Likewise, an ordinary CLIENT who WINS civil rights lawsuits also benefits society as a whole. Noting the similarity IN FUNCTION between such litigants, federal courts began jokingly referring to such ordinary, winning, civil rights CLIENTS as PAG's. The federal courts still jokingly use this term to remind the parties that a such an ordinary, winning, civil rights CLIENT has rendered a public service and is, therefore, statutorily eligible for an award of attorney fees to pay his/her attorney.

11). EFFECT: Thus, in jokingly using the TEMPORARY NICKNAME, “PAG”, the federal courts: a). were NOT somehow elevating non-attorneys to the professional level of REAL attorneys or REAL attorneys general; b). were NOT somehow recognizing a "special class" of FAKE, phony, pretend, make-believe, uneducated, unqualified, self-proclaimed "attorneys" or "attorneys general" who were somehow authorized to practice law without a license; and c). were NOT somehow creating a professional title for non-attorneys (like Class) to use.

CONCLUSION: Rod Class is not a PAG. He doesn’t even know the meaning of the term.

THE LAW:
Note: Not a single case below has anything to do with "doing accountability" against a government agency or official.

1). PAG DEFINED:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=4612481658703000905&q=%22authorizes+a+court+to+award%22+%22prevailing+party%22+%22allows+the+award+of%22+%2242+U.S.C.+19 88%22+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+%22Private+attorney+general%22+violation+%22civil+rights%22++%22when+a+ plaintiff+succeeds+in+remedying+a%22+%22he+serves+as+a%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=8789673379809042125&q=+%22attorney%27s+fees%22+%2242+U.S.C.+1988%22+%22as+a+private+attorney+general%22+%22a+plaintiff+w ho+obtains+relief+in+a%22+%22civil+rights%22+%22lawsuit+does+so%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=12968550988292561231&q=++%22prevailing+party%22+%22prevailing+parties%22+%2242+U.S.C.+1988%22+%22attorney%27s+fee%22+%22c ivil+rights%22+%22both+fee+award+provisions%22+%22are+intended+to+reward+the+successful+plaintiff+ac ting+as+a%22+%22private+attorney+general%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

2). CLASS NOT A PAG:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=18329059960657595131&q=Class+%22unauthorized+practice+of+law%22+%22to+represent+a+party+in+a+court+proceeding%22+%22permi t+an+individual+not+licensed+to+practice+law%22++%22in+no+way+does+the+concept+of+a%22++%22private+a ttorney+general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9078043099739209784&q=%22to+appear+as+a%22++%22Debtors+asked+this+court+to+allow+Mr.%22+Rodney+Dale+Class+%22this+court+ denied+the+debtors%27+request+for+supplemental+representation+by+Mr.%22%22was+not+an+attorney%22++%2 2private+attorney+general%22+&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 (READ FOOTNOTE 8, INCLUDING ITS FINAL SENTENCE)

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=16401726907532358555&q=+%22devoid+of+merit%22++%22a+lay+person+cannot+appear+as+counsel+for+others%22+%22other+individual s%22+%22as+a+lay+person,+he+cannot+prosecute+a+claim+on+behalf+of%22+Rodney+DALE+class+%22private+at torney+general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=2757756755752158953&q=denied+%22there+is+no+evidence+supporting%22+%22this+allegation%22+%22private+attorney+general%22+ %22Rodney+Class%22+%22defendant+claims+he+has+been+given+authority+by+the+house+and+senate+to+act+as +a%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . (See Ruling 35.).

Note: More Class LOSSES with identical rulings (to the above) are available on Pacer.gov. which will not allow us to link to its cases.

3). OTHER FAKE PAG's:

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=9735994746043500386&q=not+%22unauthorized+practice+of+law%22+%22to+represent+a+party+in+a+court+proceeding%22+%22permit+ an+individual+not+licensed+to+practice+law%22++%22in+no+way+does+the+concept+of+a%22++%22private+att orney+general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Cites to Class' LOSS in Pertuset above as authority.

http://scholar.google.com/scholar_case?case=11372513585713361155&q=%22demonstrate+competence%22+authorize+authorized+not+%22no+authority%22+%22unauthorized+practice+ of+law%22+%22attorney+in+fact%22+%22Power+of+Attorney%22+%22Anthony+Williams%22++%22private+attorney +general%22&hl=en&as_sdt=40006 . Same FAKE PAG who stars in video below.

PAG VIDEOS:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=cLbXtscZBM8 (another FAKE PAG goes to jail for pretending to be a PAG)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uCisCCMQqng&t=630s (CLASS describing his imaginary powers as a PAG)

VEHICLES WITH FAKE PAG MARKINGS:
http://www.nc4x4.com/forum/threads/douche-bag-attractant.159266/
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ts7CejgSkjc&t=8s (Go to video FIRST. Then, go to :05-:20).

FAKE PAG COSTUME:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8ZEYI-PTzUc&list=PLfuM34UqkW0c0UDc6psQfXTA0a1t-O7ux

FAKE PAPERS:
https://itnj.org/wp-content/uploads/ITNJ/ITNJ_Cases/rod_class/dc_case_files/130618_1st%20DC%20Filing_FIRST_COMPLAINT_JUNE_18TH_2013.pdf

ABOUT SNOOP4TRUTH:
Snoop4truth is a legal expert and whistle blower who exposes hoaxes. Snoop4truth did not expose this hoax to harm Rod Class. Instead, Snoop4truth exposed this hoax solely to reduce the catastrophic damage that such intentional fraud inflicts upon the American people every single day.

[snoop4truth]

Always look for comments by snoop4truth. They factual and backed up by links to verification and legal authority.