Shezbeth
27th January 2014, 00:24
One subject that seems to pop up with general consistency all over the web is the idea and/or desire for healing, prayers, thoughts, and support; In general, conscious manifestation and/or manipulation of probability.
Not to besmirch individuals who do and have asked for prayers and support - both for themselves and others - I have to wonder if the overall outcome is necessarily the most favorable for those involved.
While on one hand, I empathize (mostly) with individuals who find themselves subject to (as Hamlet put it) the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, I also recognize (when details are available) that many of those slings and arrows are the result of contextual details that the individual may not be conscious of, but have a decisive effect on the consequential manifestation. Simply, that which is either subsequent or consequent was set in motion by one or more forms of obsequence.
Random cancer sufferer #7 for example might seem afflicted, and I do not contest that some/many cancer sufferers' condition is/seems the result of circumstances beyond their control. There are those however who's cancer IS clearly the result of poor choices that may not have seemed so egregious at the time but culminated in the reality one faces. A smoker for example (IMO) has no business asking for healing and prayers when they contract lung cancer. Moreover there are those who's afflictions are largely to do with dietary and environmental concerns which - though brought on by either/or nescience and ignorance - are entirely addressable and largely treatable, especially with alot of the cancer research that has gone on (the alternative type, not the pharma-nonsensical variety).
More generally, adversities and afflictions of circumstances often produce some of the most profound changes in the individual. Some of the most advanced mystics, philosophers and spiritualists have found their place precisely by the loss or affliction that necessitated the development, often a complete collapse of any and all personal establishment.
The point I'm trying to illustrate is that I often find it hard to commit to the sending of healing and prayer because the more I dig into generalities or specifics, the more the line is blurred between unfortunate recipient and un/conscious participant, and as the latter becomes apparent I have a hard time resolving the divide between the terms in the thread title. With the removal of the overall consequence of action/circumstance, an individual's development can become stunted and obstructed. None of this is universal of course, which is why there are requests that I will willingly participate in (esp on Avalon).
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?67776-Please-help--My-best-friend-needs-praying-for-and-positive-thoughts-sending-her-way-
Mpod's example of his friend set me off introspectively, because while I was quick to offer suggestions and support, I also have to critically analyze my OWN motivations, having experienced similar circumstances in my own associations. Was it a desire to reconcile my own inability to contribute to the situation of MY fellows that inspired me, or was it a selfish desire to try and alleviate some of the adverse experiences I had, even though it was those very experiences that put me in a position to contribute on the level I could.
In summary, when seems appropriate I enjoy participating (directly or energetically) in the successful surpass of adversity but I also recognize that what I deem 'appropriate' comes from my own personal judgements and opinions which are both fallible and illusory.
Not to besmirch individuals who do and have asked for prayers and support - both for themselves and others - I have to wonder if the overall outcome is necessarily the most favorable for those involved.
While on one hand, I empathize (mostly) with individuals who find themselves subject to (as Hamlet put it) the slings and arrows of outrageous fortune, I also recognize (when details are available) that many of those slings and arrows are the result of contextual details that the individual may not be conscious of, but have a decisive effect on the consequential manifestation. Simply, that which is either subsequent or consequent was set in motion by one or more forms of obsequence.
Random cancer sufferer #7 for example might seem afflicted, and I do not contest that some/many cancer sufferers' condition is/seems the result of circumstances beyond their control. There are those however who's cancer IS clearly the result of poor choices that may not have seemed so egregious at the time but culminated in the reality one faces. A smoker for example (IMO) has no business asking for healing and prayers when they contract lung cancer. Moreover there are those who's afflictions are largely to do with dietary and environmental concerns which - though brought on by either/or nescience and ignorance - are entirely addressable and largely treatable, especially with alot of the cancer research that has gone on (the alternative type, not the pharma-nonsensical variety).
More generally, adversities and afflictions of circumstances often produce some of the most profound changes in the individual. Some of the most advanced mystics, philosophers and spiritualists have found their place precisely by the loss or affliction that necessitated the development, often a complete collapse of any and all personal establishment.
The point I'm trying to illustrate is that I often find it hard to commit to the sending of healing and prayer because the more I dig into generalities or specifics, the more the line is blurred between unfortunate recipient and un/conscious participant, and as the latter becomes apparent I have a hard time resolving the divide between the terms in the thread title. With the removal of the overall consequence of action/circumstance, an individual's development can become stunted and obstructed. None of this is universal of course, which is why there are requests that I will willingly participate in (esp on Avalon).
http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?67776-Please-help--My-best-friend-needs-praying-for-and-positive-thoughts-sending-her-way-
Mpod's example of his friend set me off introspectively, because while I was quick to offer suggestions and support, I also have to critically analyze my OWN motivations, having experienced similar circumstances in my own associations. Was it a desire to reconcile my own inability to contribute to the situation of MY fellows that inspired me, or was it a selfish desire to try and alleviate some of the adverse experiences I had, even though it was those very experiences that put me in a position to contribute on the level I could.
In summary, when seems appropriate I enjoy participating (directly or energetically) in the successful surpass of adversity but I also recognize that what I deem 'appropriate' comes from my own personal judgements and opinions which are both fallible and illusory.