PDA

View Full Version : Keeping an eye on the 33...



Rocky_Shorz
10th February 2014, 21:10
What started years ago, was a story told to us about a small group of controllers who run the world, it followed Bill's whistleblower who sat in a meeting in London where they discussed what they were planning...

We tossed out Charles, but what if even a small portion of what he shared was true...

he talked food shortage...

our planet has been radiated, food sources that have been safe for millions of years, are now tainted...

fish in the seas...

poisoned by fallout and cleanup from an oil spill...

the towering banks too big to fail, are quaking...

how long with they stand...

cattle herds have been cut back 60%... lack of water...

now, 9 million pounds of beef is being recalled, I'm sorry to say, was unlucky enough to go to a fancy restaurant and eat some tainted beef...

I was told it was a radioactive partical passing down through my digestive system, they haven't mentioned anything about it in the recall notice, but what if I wasn't the only one...

they say it wasn't tested or inspected...

9 million pounds of beef hit our food chain without being inspected?

or was it not tested for what it should have been...

the world is on the verge of change, but we have trapped injured animals running this world, and now more than ever we need to keep an eye on their actions...

if you run across an article with shadow government actions to be noted, please add it onto this thread...

superconsciousness
10th February 2014, 21:16
Eating a piece of meat that is 'tainted' won't do much damage...the adverse effects are cumulative. It's eating bad food over the course of years that will result in cancer, which is reversible. We suggest being more concerned over having anything to eat at all as the cost of goods and services goes through the roof.

Shezbeth
10th February 2014, 21:37
I can't say for certain, but it seems like the Beef issue was a hit against organic beef/non-CAFO farms. The reports I read indicated that there was no observable defect to the beef, just that it hadn't been govt. inspected. The recall was something along the lines of "Reasonable potential of risk to public health".

You know, the same line they push against raw milk. :ohwell:

johnf
10th February 2014, 22:20
Lots of variables in the chain of food distribution.
There are pressure points all the way to the top , but the most obvious is something we see on a daily basis.
"Production", as opposed to producing a viable product.
In Washington 1992, there were incidents of Ecoli, the end decision was to irradiate the beef, not to reduce line speeds in the meat processing plants where the contamination happens.
If you insist on unreal production speeds, anything that shouldn't be passed, will be passed from time to time.
The radioactive contamination is even harder to stop, they will not pay for the equipment to detect it.
As long as corporations are legally people this sort of thing will stand.
I definitely believe that there are psychopaths with a cold hearted plan at the top.
However the workings of the overall machine , and our as of this moment , complete lack of ability to shut the whole thing down and ensure safety before restarting it the only touchable enemy.
The smaller bits of news are the more important ones here.
The Devil, as well as it's antidote lie in the details.

JohnF