PDA

View Full Version : UFOs and Debunkers



bogeyman
14th February 2014, 13:05
This has been long standing since the beginning of the phenomena, and widely referred to as unidentified flying objects.

These events, and sightings of UFOs, have been wide spread throughout the world, through the modern era, and have not been short of controversy. In the beginning, the sceptics and officialdom stated that these sightings and events where the result of misidentifications, such as swamp gas, weather balloons, mass hallucinations, natural phenomena of various origins, and of course downright lying by the witnesses.

Now of course things have changed somewhat, depending on how you look at it. This in itself has draw backs, since various personalities get involved, some holding on to their opinion and trying to prove a point, based upon their experiences, or the way they interpret any experience or evidence that is presented to them. This in turn produces very little in terms of research value to the phenomena.

It cannot now be said that the UFO phenomena doesn’t exist, official reports have confirmed this from the United Kingdom, United States, Brazil, Spain, France, Australia, Denmark and Russia. Yet years passed these sightings from an official point of view did “not exist”, which is now contradicted by the documented evidence.

There is also the fact that classified documents still remain classified concerning the UFO, be it in this well known term, or other terms such as Unknown Tracks which are classified “SECRET REL US & CAN”. Operation Reports – 3 concerning UFOs are classified according to a FOIA official letter from the Office of Secretary of Defense, seen by this individual dated from the 1990s, and were considered “extremely sensitive” by the OSD.

The scepticism now for the most part seems to be not concerning the existence of the phenomena, but to the origins of the UFO. Some of which are now considered to be the result of classified aerial devices and aircraft, be it air breathing or space bound. I have noticed those that are not witnesses to these events seem to judge and draw conclusions without actually being involved in the event or events; this in turn creates problems, since the reliability of the witnesses can be brought into question, regardless of whether in other relative normal events that would not normally be the case.

There has been scepticism in almost all other branches of science, especially if something is introduced which does not fit the main stream view or understanding. This can slow down progress, and indeed has in some cases. Open mindedness is required in studying this phenomena but this may not be just based upon ones education, but experience and personality, and that’s where the problems can lie, and so it continues to this day.

Maybe one day the UFO phenomena will be incontrovertible, as to reveal it for what it really and truthfully is. But it seems that is a long way off at this stage.

Lifebringer
14th February 2014, 13:48
Anybody debunking UFO or ET info, is beyond stupid, and out of touch with the rest of the world that not only see them, but has millions of photos of them with better telescopes than the 1800's

Sunny-side-up
14th February 2014, 14:53
I normally prefer to call them OAP's.
That's Observed-Areal-Phenomena!
But the Old-Age-Pensioners fits as well because they have been around for ever :)

UFO acronym 'UFO' in it's self has nothing to do with ET's, the UFO can be from anyone, it basically means unidentified! So when someone says they don't believe in UFO's they must be very, very cleaver because they are basically saying they know the identity of EVERY FLYING OBJECT around the whole Globe and beyond Doh!

Love and Hugs all
Alan

sirdipswitch
14th February 2014, 15:37
I test peoples intelligence, by asking if they believe in UFOs'. chuckle chuckle.:wizard::ufo:

8Adamas8
14th February 2014, 17:55
My favorite thing to do is start off asking people if they believe in aliens. The general response is "yeah the universe is just too big". Then all I can do is laugh when they call me crazy for talking about ufos and aliens after that. Just shows you how well the programming is working even on the self-proclaimed intelligent crowd.

ghostrider
14th February 2014, 18:59
We need a new term for UFOs ... we know what they are , some of them are ours, some are drones , some are meteors but , some are actually ships flown by humans not born on earth ... there are planetary ships , light ships, beamships , and giant ships housing over 100,000 people ... a light in the sky is just that ...When they land and walk out and speak with us , then what will you call them or better yet what will people call you then ??? it is said one day an egg shaped craft will land in america and 8-12 human ET's will walk out and contact will be official made , they most likely will come from beta centauri or proxima centauri , those are the close neighbors that we have only 6 light years from us , in our time space ...

Milneman
14th February 2014, 19:04
We could keep the letters and change what they mean to something like....Unbelievably F8$%ing Obvious....lol

Alexander
14th February 2014, 20:56
We could keep the letters and change what they mean to something like....Unbelievably F8$%ing Obvious....lol

There you go

Sunny-side-up
15th February 2014, 11:16
ROLF thanks for that Milneman I needed a good instant laugh :) So true!

and yup 8Adamas8 I start conversations with the same obsevation, and then think,
'You Can't teach an old dog new tricks' well 'You can't expand an old consciousness in a sleeping mind ha!'

Maybe I try this approach when talking to someone about ET/UFO's 'When I click my fingers you will awake! CLICK' need to break the hypnoses somehow.

My favorite thing to do is start off asking people if they believe in aliens. The general response is "yeah the universe is just too big". Then all I can do is laugh when they call me crazy for talking about ufos and aliens after that. Just shows you how well the programming is working even on the self-proclaimed intelligent crowd.

UFO's well I still like to call them OAP's :)

Agape
15th February 2014, 20:02
Goes same for 'natural scientists' disbelieving 'super-natural phenomena' ;)

Chester
17th February 2014, 02:04
100 years or more ago and for many centuries prior, if you showed the pictures to people found in this link (https://www.google.com/search?q=deep+sea+creatures&client=firefox-a&hs=lvZ&rls=org.mozilla:en-US:official&channel=np&source=lnms&tbm=isch&sa=X&ei=uW4BU-zgCcmT0QHh9YDwCg&ved=0CAkQ_AUoAQ&biw=960&bih=668) and told them these are creatures that live in the sea, they would not have believed you -

and here - (http://www.picstopin.com/500/deep-sea-creatures-tumblr/http:||media-cache-ak0*pinimg*com|736x|29|7e|10|297e1018edf7e412d06512677c0462be*jpg/)