PDA

View Full Version : Pope Francis is named by former Argentine junta insider as “prime mover” in child trafficking network.



seeker/reader
16th February 2014, 17:44
Pope Francis is named by former Argentine junta insider as “prime mover” in child trafficking network. Francis concealed Vatican – Crown of England “Holyrood Agreement” authorizing joint coverup of child rape in Anglican and Catholic churches
Posted on February 2, 2014
ITCCS Breaking News Release: February 3, 2014 (GMT)

http://itccs.org/

vNTTx7gZHS4

Pope Francis named by eyewitness as child trafficker
http://youtu.be/vNTTx7gZHS4

Exclusive reports from Madrid and Rome:

A former civil servant in the Argentine military junta who is living in exile in Spain claims that Pope Francis engineered the kidnapping and trafficking of children of political prisoners during the Dirty War of the 1970′s.
Ch
The man bases his claim on his personal involvement in meetings between Bergoglio and senior junta members that secured the child trafficking networks using Catholic orphanages and religious bodies as covers.

A Spanish reporter who has interviewed the former civil servant states,

“This guy is genuine and has many names and dates, and notes from meetings. Apparently, Bergoglio was promised the top spot in the Argentine church if he cooperated with the junta. So it’s small wonder that as the Pope, he’s made it harder for honest catholics to report child abuse, considering his own complicity.”

In related news, a Vatican source claims that former Pope Benedict (Joseph Ratzinger) secured an agreement with Queen Elizabeth as head of the Church of England to conceal child rape in that body by adopting the provisions of the canon law “Crimen Sollicitationas”.

The agreement was made at Holyrood Castle in Edinburgh on September 16, 2010, during the Pope’s unprecedented visit to England that month, the first such visit in papal history.

The adoption of the notorious law by Queen Elizabeth was one of the conditions for the absorption of the Anglican church back into the Church of Rome. It compels all Anglican clergy to subvert the laws of their own countries by protecting child rapists in their ranks, silencing victims and not telling the police of the crime.

Pope Benedict resigned on February 11, 2013, followed in August by the equally unexpected resignation of Vatican Secretary of State Cardinal Tarcisio Bertone, who helped to broker the Holyrood Agreement.

The cancellation of Queen Elizabeth’s novel trip to the Vatican in March, 2013 soon after the appointment of Jorge Bergoglio as Pope Francis 1 was connected to the new Pope’s concerns that the Holyrood agreement might surface.

“Papa Francis was determined to keep the Holyrood deal secret at whatever cost because of his own ‘reform’ image and his plans to entrench Crimen even more completely in church law, which he did in his July 11 Apostolic Letter” states the Vatican source.

“One of his conditions for being made Pontiff was the dismissal of Bertone, who might link him to Holyrood. As a Jesuit, Il Papa knows you must feign one thing while doing another”.

In response to these latest revelations, the International Common Law Court of Justice in Brussels is actively proceeding with its next major case, in which its Prosecutors’ Office will seek the prosecution of Pope Francis, Jorge Bergoglio, on a charge of criminal conspiracy and aiding and abetting human trafficking.

The Court will issue its first Statement of Claim and Summonses no later than March 30, 2014.

The same Court issued a Legal Declaration on August 4, 2013, naming the Crown of England and the Roman Catholic Church as Transnational Criminal bodies under international law.

Further consequences of these facts will be disclosed this Friday, February 7 at a special press conference convened by ITCCS Field Secretary Kevin Annett, commencing at 11 am outside the Canadian consulate at 1251 Avenue of the Americas in New York City.

superconsciousness
16th February 2014, 18:01
Figures...

Lifebringer
16th February 2014, 22:38
Back during Chaves childhood, they stole body organs from the orphaned children on the streets and jungles and left them haphazardly on the sides of the road. Elites were testing for blood types. I wonder...the operation was busted in the 90's when Chavez overthrew and was elected. Hmm...The right people to cover it up with lies, but who will believe them?

Woe, what a tangled web they weave, when they practice to deceive.

Snookie
16th February 2014, 23:53
Oh, but he's such a HUMBLE man, and very concerned about the poor don't you know... :rolleyes:

I'm referring to Francis I

Ahnung-quay
17th February 2014, 00:06
Good, the ITCCS is moving fast on this. We must insure justice for the children.

Cardillac
17th February 2014, 00:34
@seeker/reader-many thanks for posting this-

there are just so many dots to connect here; it's been rumored for a long time the Order of the Jesuits controls the Vatican (but the Jesuits were first formed in the early 16th century- 'official' historical fact- so who were they before they became the 'labeled' Jesuits?- including the "officious historical fact" that Ignatious Loyala and Co. were persecuted)-

from the most recent going backwards:

A) Karen Hudes' recent testimonies implying the Jesuits are controlling the monetary system;
B) Jordan Maxwell has always stated the Vatican is the source of the world's woes;
C) GeorgeAnn Hughes's recent posting on her latest 'g's data' (www.thebyteshow.com) reporting/more insight on how the U.S. "Act of 1871" was nothing more than a Papal underbelly clawed takeover of the U.S. turning a sovereign nation into the status of a corporation for the benefit of the Vatican;
D) the tiny "neutral" (cough) country of Switzerland (biggest money-laundering country in the world thanks to the Swiss banking code of secrecy) provides the.......
Swiss Guard that protects the Vatican;

I've read (don't know yet if completely true) the international banksters (all supposedly/labeled Jewish) are nothing more than book keepers for the Vatican;

another dot to connect: Adam Weishaupt, reportedly founder of the Bavarian Illuminati, was Catholic...

the more info I read/glean the more I'm beginning to think both Maxwell and Hudes (among other numerous sources) are actually right (but my opinion is always subject to change if I receive additional info)-

please stay well all-

Larry

Froddo
17th February 2014, 00:44
A Spanish reporter who has interviewed the former civil servant states ...


Exactly who is Spanish reporter that has made such interview and where and when was it published?

Thanks in advance.

Cardillac
17th February 2014, 00:53
just a quick addendum to my last positing:

regarding my first (and hopefully last) visit to the Vatican City 2 yrs. ago: I never saw so many paintings/statues/frescos, etc. of naked men and naked little boys in one small area in my life!; all under the pretence of 'art'...

and if one is aware of intuitive Miriam Delicado, she's predicted (let's hope she's right this time) there will be a major revelation this spring either from a major political/religious figure about something that will be of tremendous shock to most people OR something will be revealed ABOUT a major payer in the world arena exposing that person for whom that entity really is-

guess we'll just have to sit back and wait...

Larry

Snookie
17th February 2014, 05:27
Courtney Brown is also saying there will be an announcement in February that will change how we view the world.

mountain_jim
17th February 2014, 14:39
He's now moved it back to March - thread on that here:

http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?67668-Courtney-Brown-Announcement-for-February-2014

aranuk
17th February 2014, 17:58
I don't know the authenticity of the report, but they got a wee bitty mixed up with Holyrood Palace and Edinburgh Castle. It quotes Holyrood Castle which doesn't exist. I am from Edinburgh. If they got that wrong, then what else did they get wrong. On the other hand, to be fair, I do believe the reports.

Stan

Lcam88
19th February 2014, 11:40
A public notice made on Radio Cultura around 8:10 AM on February 19, 2014 here in São Paulo Brazil, announced that aforementioned man and subject of accusations suggested on this thread, has received diplomatic papers of Argentina. In the declaration he was named "Diplomat to the Vatican". His recently or soon to be issued diplomatic passport is valid for 10 years.

I presume not that diplomatic immunity is the heart of these maneuverings, rather, perhaps a heightening of the burden of proof as well as secrecy of the proceedings, especially given the sensitive nature of his public image in light of the accusations. Perhaps it's that latter point, secrecy, that is tantamount to his new public mandate.

araucaria
19th February 2014, 11:59
I don't know the authenticity of the report, but they got a wee bitty mixed up with Holyrood Palace and Edinburgh Castle. It quotes Holyrood Castle which doesn't exist. I am from Edinburgh. If they got that wrong, then what else did they get wrong. On the other hand, to be fair, I do believe the reports.

Stan
They're just going the extra Royal Mile ;)

aranuk
19th February 2014, 14:15
I don't know the authenticity of the report, but they got a wee bitty mixed up with Holyrood Palace and Edinburgh Castle. It quotes Holyrood Castle which doesn't exist. I am from Edinburgh. If they got that wrong, then what else did they get wrong. On the other hand, to be fair, I do believe the reports.

Stan
They're just going the extra Royal Mile ;)
Hi Araucaria, I take it that you have visited Edinburgh then? When? I have visited Paris once, 30 years ago, a beautiful city too!

Stan

araucaria
19th February 2014, 14:46
I don't know the authenticity of the report, but they got a wee bitty mixed up with Holyrood Palace and Edinburgh Castle. It quotes Holyrood Castle which doesn't exist. I am from Edinburgh. If they got that wrong, then what else did they get wrong. On the other hand, to be fair, I do believe the reports.

Stan
They're just going the extra Royal Mile ;)
Hi Araucaria, I take it that you have visited Edinburgh then? When? I have visited Paris once, 30 years ago, a beautiful city too!

Stan
Stan, I've been a few times to Edinburgh, mostly a very long time ago. It is a famous city, but my point was that maybe it is not so famous that someone might not innocently mix up two of its landmarks. A lot of Frenchmen might be more familiar with Murrayfield and the pubs :)