Mark Dice YouTube Channel Deleted

[Referee]

Luke breaks it down.......

-db510Hikt8

[mojo]

Was so bummed when Google took YouTube. Then last year they forced all Youtubers to take Google plus, it wasnt an option. They are such hypocrites to chase down honest channels for strikes against them because of their content, and yet when I check the daily uploads for UFOs I see multiple almost 20 plus new uploads from one channel copying/stealing other videos to make ad revenue from. Creating & building a channel in one day with hundreds of new videos and I ask, Google doesnt see this? Come on..I despise Google and wish I had the money to buy hundreds of servers and provide an new alterative. And Vimeo, they dont seeem to be doing anything as an alternative, maybe Google owns them too?

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Wasn't there once some sort of book or film about "THE CORPORATION" that controls EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE, oh, sometime in the near future/present?

:(

edit: of course Microsoft is still duking it out with Google... but for all we know they are lateral-network bum buds and laugh all the way to the bank every day we go on believing it's not all one octopus.

:crazy: :drama: :confused:

[Gerald Paris]

Folks whose "lives depend on youtube" should consider using a different hosting site for their information. And if youtube is that vital to ones existence, then use it as an advertising platform to direct folks to the site that your information is hosted on.

I (as alone on this as I may be within the awakened circles) do not find value in most of the information that dice, rudkowski, bermas and the vast majority of spotlight "truthers" have to offer. Though I do no agreeing with the censorship, I would not have them silenced.

Personal opinion based on personal logic and reason.

Thank you for sharing.

Much Love

G

[Sidney]

Wasn't there once some sort of book or film about "THE CORPORATION" that controls EVERY ASPECT OF LIFE, oh, sometime in the near future/present?

:(

edit: of course Microsoft is still duking it out with Google... but for all we know they are lateral-network bum buds and laugh all the way to the bank every day we go on believing it's not all one octopus.

:crazy: :drama: :confused:

Microsoft and Google sleep in the same bed, regardless how it looks from the outside.

[Shezbeth]

Sounds to me like a Beta test.

If I were in 'their' shoes (the operant plutocrats and subsequent officials, bureaucrats, etc.) I would pick a reasonably large but not too large of a target, shut them down, and then assess the response. In Dice's case, and other high profile Youtubers, he has a mirror channel but how much are they the norm? Hopefully this will be seen as a warning and any anti-govt. or whatever vloggers and posters will take precautions to avoid being at risk of 'losing everything', but naturally there are many that would/will not.

One of the 48 Laws of Power is "Strike at the Shepherd and the Sheep will Scatter". This appears to be a modified expression of the idea, though instead of striking at 'the' shepherd, it looks like they have struck at a 'lesser' shepherd (not to diminish Dice's work, but I imagine there are posters who are more disliked by the establishment) to analyze and observe the reaction collectively to gauge the public response, to gauge the individual (Dice's) response, and to assess any activity or reactionary measures.

Edit: Moreover, by choosing a 'lesser' outspoken person as their target prevents the majority from lending any credibility to other more vitriolic individuals. Individuals like Alex Jones will rightly point to this (and other) activity and claim foul, but everyone expects that of him. To the average person, if there was censorship or foul play involved there would be many more high profile posters being shut down. Such people would then speculate that there may have been and/or 'probably' was some element to Dice's work that was questionable.

Basically, this strikes me as mid-level incrementalism.

[Gerald Paris]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5fJ0v1Oapfs

[sigma6]

Mark Dice is too sharp and bold. So Gutsy, and his comments are brutal sometimes. And he is so good at exposing things so blatantly. I liked watching his interpretation of the illuminati obsessed music industry. (refreshing) They can see him coming from a mile, 60,000,000 views? That must be threatening to somebody.

Big Brother is watching you.

[Azt]

The channel seems to be back in. Now, I am getting a feeling that:

1) People spreading the word about deleted channels are working and Google is scared (as a company) by that "movement"

or

2) Those are disinfo agents that is grabbing more attentions to their channels (by getting suspended) and out of the blue get back in.

[skuzzy]

[QUOTE=Gerald Paris;813181
I (as alone on this as I may be within the awakened circles) do not find value in most of the information that dice, rudkowski, bermas and the vast majority of spotlight "truthers" have to offer. Though I do no agreeing with the censorship, I would not have them silenced.

Personal opinion based on personal logic and reason.

Thank you for sharing.

Much Love

G[/QUOTE]

I get your angle, it is a very good one to be honest. But i must point out with Dice that what he is doing is not so much spreading valuable info that we get from places that showcase whistle blowers(camelot, avalon) but he is demonstrating often how 'sheep' are just that. When he is out asking people to sign petitions for ridiculous things, they just agree and move on, their brain functioning outside of conscious thought.

The most memorable one I believe was asking people if they wanted to buy a few ounces of gold for $20. Im sure there were people who laughed and said 'hell ya!' but they dont get on the montage. Only the dummies are showcased and the point is to show you just how asleep people really are.

He does good work on symbolism too in the music industry as has been mentioned already. I remember one video about 'rapper' rick ross and he dug up past info that he used to be a prison guard and you read his lyrics and hes talkin all that gangsta ****, which i instantly caught as bs. Just another example of how the 'biz' takes someone and portrays a false image for unknowing people to gobble up, thinking hes all legit and thats what they want to be seen as listening to, i dont know why though. Jayz is another example as being used for money making, i wonder if its a coincidence that his first company was rocka(feller)wear?? hehe.

Anyway, i think he is a soft approach at getting people to wake up. Not many people can handle the intense stuff such as et, black projects, advanced technology we cant know about, murders/coverups/cult sacrifices/mind controlled slaves and all that stuff thats hard for even an open minded person to swallow at first.

My point? If I were to sum it up, id say he is the soft-core (baby blue) version of project camelot interviews. Get the ball rolling and you will find yourself opening up to the more controversial topics.

[Gerald Paris]

thank you for adding to the conversation.

Much Love

G