sigma6
24th March 2014, 17:59
50,000 rally in Moscow against Russian 'Occupation' - Corporate Level Internet Propaganda?
BREAKING NEWS ALRIGHT... and the NEWS is GOOGLE is being used for major propaganda campaigns by a coordinated effort of major MSM sites...
I just had to post this... I see this link, and go to it, at the french news site (AFP, I think) When I get there there is no article, just the headline????
I see a 125x125 link ad on "breaking news" on this page (major MSM Site) dated Mar.18 2014,
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2014/mar/18/8-well-intentioned-comments-young-people-sick-hearing-generation-y
see image near bottom... it is making reference to "Breaking News" I click it and got to this page. Note the first page is the Guardian (Big MSM site) and it goes to another big French MSM site and voila - NO article!...
http://www.france24.com/en/breaking/20140315-50000-rally-moscow-against-russia-intervention-crimea/?ns_source=outbrain&ns_campaign=lien&ns_mchannel=acquisition&ns_linkname=editorial&aef_campaign_ref=outbrain_france24en-site&campaign_date=inconnue
Yet this article is supposed to be dated Mar. 15th, 2014, (not sure why that would be breaking news... none-the-less, no article, no pictures... I smell a huge internet marketing propaganda campaign in the works, when have we seen backdated sites on the web before (Sandyhook?)
Then I Google search it, and see the headline come, up, but as I go to each individual site and check out the articles. I see vague articles, some not even related, and no specifically related pictures? And in some I can't even see the headline!? Like this one from the wire...
http://www.thewire.com/global/2014/03/50000-people-gather-moscow-protest-russian-intervention-ukraine/359210/
But the headline reads:
As Crimea Votes to Join Russia, Ukrainian and Russian Troops Head Toward Border and shows a lame picture of ordinary people voting...
Notice what they did, they put the "50,000 people" phrase into the perma-link, this shows sophistication, not sure why, but it makes for a great confounding of the Google Search results... i.e. they didn't have time to change the content? Keep tabs on this link... If the content changes, then what we are witnessing is a TOP DOWN, BLATANT, IN YOUR FACE, PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN, where they are literally targeting sites, that show peaceful voting (for example, something they must truly abhor) and could end up changing the content to match the perma-link header.... This might be something one might do if they were given the task to co-ordinate huge changes across many networks (and of course we know they are ALL more or less controlled by the same people at the highest levels...
Google IS Being taken over by Big Brother... Why else would YouTube allow an agency of SUPER FLAGGERS. Knowing full well it will kill their reputation? This wreaks of the Cabal DESPERATION that Benjamin Fulford has clearly described. If this is going on... (and as Bush would say... "and it clearly is...") I can't wait for the backlash on this one.
Anyhow the last 4 or 5 I checked I see this disconnect between the headline and the site article and in NONE do I see any pictures related to this news article either....???
I know internet marketing tools are getting very sophisticated these days as marketers continue to innovate, but it looks like the large corporations are hiring these guys and using their strategies to create illegal, totally phony super propaganda campaigns.
That great, and let me guess these are the same guys that Google just gave Super Flagger status to????
Note all the sites that come up are big name corporation sites... BBC, TIME, France24, The Wire, Yahoo. i.e. NOTHING ALTERNATIVE... Zero. And I suspect if there is any, they will be buying out traitors...
This is someone's sophisticated social engineering experiment... Take note. This is so incredibly dangerous in my mind the implications of this...
BREAKING NEWS ALRIGHT... and the NEWS is GOOGLE is being used for major propaganda campaigns by a coordinated effort of major MSM sites...
I just had to post this... I see this link, and go to it, at the french news site (AFP, I think) When I get there there is no article, just the headline????
I see a 125x125 link ad on "breaking news" on this page (major MSM Site) dated Mar.18 2014,
http://www.theguardian.com/lifeandstyle/shortcuts/2014/mar/18/8-well-intentioned-comments-young-people-sick-hearing-generation-y
see image near bottom... it is making reference to "Breaking News" I click it and got to this page. Note the first page is the Guardian (Big MSM site) and it goes to another big French MSM site and voila - NO article!...
http://www.france24.com/en/breaking/20140315-50000-rally-moscow-against-russia-intervention-crimea/?ns_source=outbrain&ns_campaign=lien&ns_mchannel=acquisition&ns_linkname=editorial&aef_campaign_ref=outbrain_france24en-site&campaign_date=inconnue
Yet this article is supposed to be dated Mar. 15th, 2014, (not sure why that would be breaking news... none-the-less, no article, no pictures... I smell a huge internet marketing propaganda campaign in the works, when have we seen backdated sites on the web before (Sandyhook?)
Then I Google search it, and see the headline come, up, but as I go to each individual site and check out the articles. I see vague articles, some not even related, and no specifically related pictures? And in some I can't even see the headline!? Like this one from the wire...
http://www.thewire.com/global/2014/03/50000-people-gather-moscow-protest-russian-intervention-ukraine/359210/
But the headline reads:
As Crimea Votes to Join Russia, Ukrainian and Russian Troops Head Toward Border and shows a lame picture of ordinary people voting...
Notice what they did, they put the "50,000 people" phrase into the perma-link, this shows sophistication, not sure why, but it makes for a great confounding of the Google Search results... i.e. they didn't have time to change the content? Keep tabs on this link... If the content changes, then what we are witnessing is a TOP DOWN, BLATANT, IN YOUR FACE, PROPAGANDA CAMPAIGN, where they are literally targeting sites, that show peaceful voting (for example, something they must truly abhor) and could end up changing the content to match the perma-link header.... This might be something one might do if they were given the task to co-ordinate huge changes across many networks (and of course we know they are ALL more or less controlled by the same people at the highest levels...
Google IS Being taken over by Big Brother... Why else would YouTube allow an agency of SUPER FLAGGERS. Knowing full well it will kill their reputation? This wreaks of the Cabal DESPERATION that Benjamin Fulford has clearly described. If this is going on... (and as Bush would say... "and it clearly is...") I can't wait for the backlash on this one.
Anyhow the last 4 or 5 I checked I see this disconnect between the headline and the site article and in NONE do I see any pictures related to this news article either....???
I know internet marketing tools are getting very sophisticated these days as marketers continue to innovate, but it looks like the large corporations are hiring these guys and using their strategies to create illegal, totally phony super propaganda campaigns.
That great, and let me guess these are the same guys that Google just gave Super Flagger status to????
Note all the sites that come up are big name corporation sites... BBC, TIME, France24, The Wire, Yahoo. i.e. NOTHING ALTERNATIVE... Zero. And I suspect if there is any, they will be buying out traitors...
This is someone's sophisticated social engineering experiment... Take note. This is so incredibly dangerous in my mind the implications of this...