Agenda 21, Vaccines & The Female Of The Species [Archive]

Hervé

31st March 2014, 19:44

Tetanus Vaccines Sterilizing Women In Kenya? Catholic Church There Raises Suspicions (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions)

Posted on: Thursday, March 27th 2014 at 8:30 am
Written By: Sayer Ji, Founder (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/gmi-blogs/sayer%20ji)

http://cdn.greenmedinfo.com/sites/default/files/ckeditor/Sayer%20Ji/images/tetanus_vaccine_kenya_fertility.jpg
A concerning new report from the head cardinal of the Catholic Church in Kenya alleges that a WHO/UNICEF sponsored tetanus vaccination campaign may conceal an agenda of forced contraception for over 2 million Kenyan women.

In a move that is garnering international attention (http://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/africa/kenyan-cardinal-john-njue-tells-congregation-that-tetanus-vaccination-programme-for-pregnant-women-is-a-bit-fishy-9214994.html), the head of the Catholic Church in Kenya has raised suspicions about the World Health Organization and UNICEF's tetanus vaccine campaign in their country, which is exclusively targeting over two million Kenyan women of children bearing age (14-49), to the exclusion of males and those younger who may be at higher risk from lethal harm from the tetanus infection. (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=2#_edn1)

The vaccination campaign began in September of last year, is in the second of a planned three phases, and now covers 60 districts in that country. The final round is slated to begin in September of this year.

As reported on March 27th in the StandardDigital (http://www.standardmedia.co.ke/mobile/?articleID=2000107916&story_title=Catholic%20Church%20questions%20ongoing%20tetanus%20vaccination%20targeting%20women%20ag ed%20between%2014-49%20years/lifestyle/), John Cardinal Njue is alleged the WHO/UNICEF tetanus campaign has been uncharacteristically shrouded from public awareness relative to other national health initiatives that are preceded by a public launch where the public has an opportunity to ask questions. A Citizennews.co.ke news story filmed testimony of John Cardinal Njue voicing his concerns, which can be viewed here (http://citizennews.co.ke/news/2012/local/item/18145-tetanus-vaccine-controversy).

According to the StandardDigital report, the Catholic Health Commission of Kenya sent a statement to newsrooms on March the 26th alleging that there has not been adequate stakeholder engagement both in the preparation and implementation of the campaign. The main questions the Church raised for discussion were:
1 - Is there a tetanus crisis on women of child-bearing age in Kenya? If this is so, why has it not been declared?

2- Why does the campaign target women of 14 - 49 years?

3- Why has the campaign left out young girls, boys and men even if they are all prone to tetanus?

4- In the midst of so many life-threatening diseases in Kenya, why has tetanus been prioritized?
Additionally, the statement read:
"Information in the public domain indicates that Tetanus Toxoid vaccine (TT) laced with Beta human chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG) sub unit has been used in Philippines, Nicaragua and Mexico to vaccinate women against future pregnancy. Beta HCG sub unit is a hormone necessary for pregnancy"
The Church's concerns are not without legitimate basis in vaccine fact and history, with previous suspicions being raised over tetanus immunization campaigns in the underdeveloped world concealing a forced 'family planning' agenda.

Not only has a birth control vaccine been known to exist for over twenty years using tetanus toxoid as a carrier (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/7683889),[ii] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=2#_edn2) but it was heralded in the mid-90's as "A new family planning tool to slow population growth (http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/23163/1/109028.pdf)." The development of a tetanus-based contraceptive vaccine began in 1975 by Dr. Gursaran Talwar, Director of India's National Institute of Immunology, and after $4.5 million of funding and 17 years later a working vaccine was created, whose mechanism of action has been described as follows:
"The vaccine works by "convincing" a woman's body that a11 is unchanged when, in fact, an egg has been fertilized. After conception occurs, a woman produces a hormone called human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG) that helps to prepare the uterus for pregnancy. The prototype vaccine, made from hCG coupled to a biochemical carrier, neutralizes hCG by stimulating antibodies against the hormone. Without hCG the embryo can't anchor in the uterus, making pregnancy impossible. The biochemical carrier makes the hCG immunologically visible to women's immune system." [Source (http://idl-bnc.idrc.ca/dspace/bitstream/10625/23163/1/109028.pdf)]
Additionally, in 1995, a report published in [I]Vaccine Weekly (http://fastapo.files.wordpress.com/2013/05/tetanus-vaccine-may-be-laced-with-anti-fertility-d-vaccine-wkly-1995-may-29-jun-5-pubmed-result.pdf) described the case of a priest, president of Human Life International based in Maryland, who petitioned Congress to investigate reports of women in developing countries, such as Mexico, the Philippines and in Nicaragua, receiving contraceptive tetanus vaccines laced with chorionic gonadotropin (b-HCG). The report stated that the anti-fertility vaccine was developed by the World Health Organization (WHO), and other organizations including "UN Population Fund, the UN Development Programme, the World Bank, the Population Council, the Rockefeller Foundation, the US National Institute of Child Health and Human Development, the All India Institute of Medical Sciences, and Uppsala, Helsinki, and Ohio State universities."

While sparse safety research has been published on tetanus toxoid vaccines effectiveness and safety, especially when administered to pregnant women, the tetanus vaccine, when administered through the multi-antigen DTwP, which contains diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis antigens together, has been linked to a wide range of adverse health effects, including SIDS, (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_edn3) increased infant mortality,[iv] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_edn4) [v] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_edn5) Gulliain-Barre Syndrome,[vi] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_edn6) and several dozen others health conditions. View the primary citations here: DTwP Vaccine Adverse Effects (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-tetanus).

At this time, allegations that the tetanus toxoid vaccine used in Kenya may contain an anti-fertility substance has not resulted in the launch of an official investigation, nor even basic testing of suspect batches of vaccine. To the contrary, there is widespread denial of the relevance of the concern, which is often the case when the known adverse health effects of vaccines are discussed within the mainstream media or health organizations, the latter of have predicated their entire mission statements and policy-making decisions on the assumption that they are highly safe and effective [I]a priori.

At the very least, given the established dangers and ongoing controversy associated with vaccinating pregnant women (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/deadly-truth-about-flu-vaccines-and-pregnancy), and the well-know abortive properties associated with vaccines (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/vaccination-abortion), especially in veterinary vaccines, a red flag of caution should be raised and critical inquiry as to what the real risks and benefits of this campaign in Kenyan women of child-bearing age really are.

[i] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref1) Talwar GP, Singh OM, Gupta SK, Hasnain SE, Pal R, Majumbar SS, Vrati S, Mukhopadhay A, Srinivasan J, Deshmukh U, et al. The HSD-hCG vaccine prevents pregnancy in women: feasibility study of a reversible safe contraceptive vaccine. (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/9083611) Am J Reprod Immunol. 1997 Feb;37(2):153-60. PubMed PMID: 9083611.

[ii] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref2) G P Talwar, O Singh, R Pal, N Chatterjee, S N Upadhyay, C Kaushic, S Garg, R Kaur, M Singh, S Chandrasekhar. A birth control vaccine is on the horizon for family planning. (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/birth-control-vaccine-horizon-family-planning) Ann Med. 1993 Apr ;25(2):207-12. PMID: 7683889 (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/birth-control-vaccine-horizon-family-planning)

[iii] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref3) GreenMedInfo.com, Multiple Infant Vaccines Linked to Dramatically Increased Mortality (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/multiple-infant-vaccines-linked-dramatically-increased-mortality), Dec. 2013

[iv] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref4) GreenMedInfo.com, DTwP and Infant to Mortality (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/topic/53464/focus/23271/page)

[v] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref5) Mogens Helweg Claesson. Immunological Links to Nonspecific Effects of DTwP and BCG Vaccines on Infant Mortality. (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/association-dtwp-vaccines-and-increased-infant-mortality-females-may-be-due) J Trop Med. 2011 ;2011:706304. Epub 2011 May 5. PMID:21760811 (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/article/association-dtwp-vaccines-and-increased-infant-mortality-females-may-be-due)

[vi] (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/tetanus-vaccines-sterilizing-women-kenya-catholic-church-there-raises-suspicions?page=1#_ednref6) GreenMedInfo.com, DTwp and Guillain-Barre Syndrome (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/greenmed/topic/53503/focus/511/page)

Tesla_WTC_Solution

31st March 2014, 19:47

This happened at least once in Canada.
Some pregnant women signed up for a Tetanus vaccine series (new), and lost their pregnancies/became sterile after.

In the military there were rumors of Tetanus shots making MEN and WOMEN sterile.

I've had one abnormal child and 3 + miscarriages since the military and receiving civilian (FLU) vaccines during pregnancy.

Be warned.

p.s. it would be nice if the Pope could speak about this topic.
He is one of the only people on earth who could say it and be heard.

p.p.s. please read about African Nodding Disease striking children between 5-15, vaccination window. The native nematodes that cause River Blindness react to the vaccines given in Uganda; the nematodes are less affected by the immune system of humans after vaccines! Also if the nematodes are infected by Wolbachia bacteria, commonly used by Oxitec mosquito release campaigns, they can live even longer in the brain, and upon death, they cause the human immune system to directly attack any brain cells that come into contact with the worms...

it's a very sad situation in Africa, and it's not just the continent that causes the illnesses. It's the white investors.

Snoweagle

1st April 2014, 01:14

Eugenics and Pharmaceuticals - that's how they said they would do it, and they are doing it

The program is supported by the UN, so how do we stop it?

We must ALL say NO. We must educate others to do the same.

Matt P

1st April 2014, 01:59

T Smith

1st April 2014, 02:29

But of course vaccines are causing sterility. Bill Gates himself said that vaccines' purpose is population reduction. Oh, but you thought he meant by making people healthier and that healthier people make more responsible reproductive choices? Uh, no.
I spent years studying vaccines and now have no need to read another article about them, nor another report about alleged side effects. Once you know the story of their development and their purpose, all else becomes clear. Vaccines are bio-weapons. They are designed to make people sick and to make money. Population reduction is just icing on the cake. They never were designed to eradicate disease (I mean, really!? The medical cartel suppresses every cancer cure that comes along). They never ended polio or smallpox. The mainstream medical marketing is all just a big con on a gullible public, enabled by uneducated medical "professionals" who are unable or unwilling to think for themselves and who care more about their paychecks than "first doing no harm."

Matt

Yep. Every point you make is on 100% on target. It is just so very elementary; I find it extremely hard to understand--and I mean this very sincerely--how so many people just don't get it, and often with such adamant and vicious arrogance.

Case in point: If you were the actress being ridiculed in this recent interview, how do you respond to the arrogance (is this plain ignorance, i.e., a useful idiot for the agenda you describe or just a vicious shill? -- I honestly don't know... I have a hard time reconciling with the possibility that this woman is just that smug, closed, and dumb at the same time. She is either a unwitting tool of a very diabolical agenda or a sinister shill. Either way, it evokes a very unpleasant emotion in me which often impedes my ability to respond rationally):

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=q95IMcziuC4#t=10

What is the best way to respond to this kind of person when you were accosted like this?

Matt P

1st April 2014, 10:34

What is the best way to respond to this kind of person when you were accosted like this?

Don't be accosted would be my first recommendation. Know your topic and a couple defensive maneuvers and it won't happen.
This video is a deceptive example of how the conversation really goes and has a very specific purpose to confuse and scare anyone who may be watching. First of all, you'll notice that on television the network "news" reader NEVER interviews a person who can intelligently respond to vaccine questions. You won't see them interview Sherri Tenpenny or Suzanne Humphries, for example! This poor woman who doesn't vaccinate has read and has concerns about vaccines enough to know she should probably avoid them but she can't even remember the source where she got her information! If she had confidence that comes from knowledge, she would have stopped the interviewer when she was called a "communist" and corrected her rudeness instead of laughing about it. At the very least, she should have stopped her and said something to the effect of, "Listen, I'm not the expert, I have just read enough to know I don't want to take any chances with my baby and I am not going to have this conversation with you and you are not going to speak to me in that way."
As well, not a single "news" interviewer is ever educated on vaccines. They are simply reading what they've been told to read. You can tell because they ask the same old questions over and over and over. You can't have a debate with someone who has only the opinions of others as their ammunition.
You have to remember also that many of these interviews are edited and anything that would benefit the side of vaccine truth is taken out. My local paper interviewed me for a front page story on vaccines a couple years ago and, of course, my published comments were twisted to show me in a bad light. All my common sense and sourced information was left out. This is standard operating procedure.
In an actual situation with a person asking me questions, it goes much differently. As soon as I hear the standard regurgitated BS, I stop the person and let them know it is impossible for us to have an intelligent conversation about it when they have not done their homework and have no idea of the history of vaccine development and the evidence of effectiveness. You have to be disciplined to not try to educate a complete sleepwalker.
For the few who seem to have a little bit of an open mind and can turn off their brainwashing for 5 minutes, I love to tell the story about the development of the polio vaccine. My story is based on the book Dr. Mary's Monkey (nutshell: millions of first doses contaminated with simian viruses known to cause soft tissue cancers, passed down to offspring; vaccine development then taken over by military and weaponized; contamination covered up and the campaign continued while KNOWING they were poisoning people and future generations). As an indirect bonus, this book will also give you an amazing understanding of events around the Kennedy assassination you never had before (Oswald was a small part of the vaccine development, in that he was a chaperone to one of the young researchers working on the project).
Perhaps the most used line is that vaccines eradicated polio and small pox. I had a tough time countering this one until I got to know Suzanne Humphries' work. She is a nephrologist and her book Dissolving Illusions will have you shredding this argument. She also has some fantastic youtube videos.
Sometimes common sense points have impact. Think of some of the best movies you ever saw. Did somebody have to force you to go see them? Or was the word of mouth so strong you had to see for yourself? If vaccines were so incredible and if vaccines were getting rid of illnesses and keeping people healthy, don't you think people would be tripping over themselves to go get them and then telling their friends how incredible it was to be so healthy? Would we have to pass laws to force people or fire them from their jobs for refusing? If they really prevented disease, people would be lining up to get them.
Then there's the Herd argument some will use. Even though it's absolutely the dumbest argument, I understand people only use it because they want to feel like they are doing what EVERYONE ELSE is doing that is right and good. I always say if YOU are vaccinated and you believe that protects you, then you should have no fear of me being unvaccinated and you catching anything from me.
It also helps to remember that when you're talking to someone about vaccines, it's like talking to someone about 9/11 or extraterrestrials. It's not enough to know the facts. For people to get to true vaccine awareness, they have to first accept their government and medical institutions would knowingly lie to them and harm them. This is a very difficult barrier to overcome and the real reason vaccine awareness is so difficult. Most people will not accept their authorities will lie to them so easily and frequently.
Vaccines are a huge part of the control matrix keeping people in line on this prison planet. Vaccine truth will not come out just like 9/11, ET and other truths will not come out until the criminal cabal that owns world government and media is destroyed or the wave of information is so big and strong that it just crashes down.
Matt

Matt P

1st April 2014, 10:55

Vaccines prey upon peoples' ignorance of true health. That's the problem. As a people we have forgotten how to be healthy and we've been brainwashed to believe true health can only come from a pill or a doctor--from something outside ourselves. No one should feel the need to get a flu vaccine if they knew what the flu was and how to be immune from it. Healthy, alkaline interior terrain laughs at the flu. Most flu is just the body's natural response to acidosis (i.e. poor diet). Why would anyone need a polio vaccine? Close to 100% of contracted polio cases are without symptoms. It's crazy to vaccinate for something that is harmless in 98 out of 100 people who get it. As Suzanne Humphries explains so well, our bodies NEED to get chickenpox because this allows our bodies to develop crucial parts of our immune systems. Why would anyone want to try prevent that? As if they could anyway. The evidence is clear that most outbreaks of polio, whooping cough, flu, etc come in vaccinated populations. But, shhh, you're not supposed to know that!

T Smith

2nd April 2014, 03:37

Hervé

13th April 2014, 13:52

Here is a repost from the compendium on autism thread (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?63627-File-It-Away-Right-Here-Before-You-Forget--A-Thread-for-Autism-Research-Paper-Links):

Gardasil: Child Abuse by Big Pharma (http://www.townsendletter.com/FebMarch2014/gardasil0214.html)

by Gary Null, PhD, and Nancy Ashley
http://www.townsendletter.com/Images/transparent.gif

http://www.townsendletter.com/Images/transparent.gif
From the Townsend Letter February/March 2014 (http://www.townsendletter.com/FebMarch2014/FebMarch2014.html)

Page 1, 2 (http://www.townsendletter.com/FebMarch2014/gardasil0214_2.html)
Gardasil, the human papillomavirus vaccine produced by Merck, was brought to market in 2006 with great fanfare, widely proclaimed as the first ever anticancer vaccine. Having gained a strong foothold due to fast-tracking by the FDA and rushed to market ahead of completed safety studies and ahead of its competitor, Gardasil was already an entrenched, recommended vaccine by the time it was approved.1 Merck created a market for Gardasil out of thin air with deceptive and dishonest advertising, and thereby planted fear in the mind of consumers: fear of an unknown health crisis, an invisible time bomb waiting to explode and harm women everywhere.2 When criticized for its aggressive marketing, Merck countered that it was performing a public service by raising awareness about the human papillomavirus and wasn't selling anything.3 Really? This lie became public as Merck was caught lobbying the 50 states for mandatory Gardasil vaccination prior to FDA approval.4 The fact is that there was never a need for Gardasil in the first place: regular Pap testing had already lowered the incidence of cervical cancer by 80% in the US to a few thousand cases a year, and the vast majority of all HPV infections resolve of their own accord.5 But by lining the coffers of such groups as Women in Government (WIG), National Foundation for Women Legislators (NFWL), National Conference of State Legislatures (NCSL), and, of course, the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC), Merck was able to influence legislation such that almost immediately after the vaccine was approved, it was part of the vaccine schedule recommended for all girls.6 If it hadn't been for Governor Rick Perry's blatantly self-serving blunder of trying to mandate Gardasil for school attendance in Texas in the face of huge conflict of interest and a $50 million contribution to his presidential campaign, Gardasil might have gone even further.7

There is something deeply wrong with a giant pharmaceutical company spending hundreds of millions of dollars to manipulate women and influence legislation in order to generate a revenue stream of billions of dollars a year for itself at the expense of a gullible public. Because what is wrong with Gardasil isn't just that it is unnecessary. Gardasil is possibly the most dangerous vaccine on the market, with the potential to injure, maim, or even kill the children who receive it. The program of coercion to vaccinate every 11- to 26-year-old girl with Gardasil is relentless. This vaccine is given not just in doctor's offices, where doctors have been known to "fire" noncompliant patients, but in schools and colleges, where the pressure on girls and their parents to conform can be extreme. These institutions all have quotas – sometimes including financial rewards – and they are anxious to prove high rates of compliance.8 But there is no informed consent prior to vaccination, so most of these girls and their parents have no idea what they are risking by agreeing to vaccination with Gardasil. While Merck, the FDA, the CDC and the medical establishment all deny that there have been serious, life-altering adverse events associated with Gardasil, the fact is that compared with the mandated vaccines which are given with greater frequency, Gardasil still has the most adverse events reported to the Vaccine Adverse Event Reporting System (VAERS) of any vaccine. And since reporting of adverse events is not mandatory in the US (although outbreaks of so-called vaccine-preventable illness are), it is likely that only 10% even get reported!9

And what of the victims of Merck's war on cervical cancer? Alexis Wolf was a normal seventh-grader in 2007. She had type 1 diabetes, but had successfully learned how to give herself insulin shots and eventually graduated to an insulin pump, which she also mastered easily. Alexis made the honor roll for the first time that year, and was rewarded with a trip to Germany over the summer to visit her grandparents. Her endocrinologist believed that the diabetes was under control and thought that Alexis would be perfectly capable of making the trip on her own and managing her diabetes herself. To make sure everything was in order prior to travel, Alexis' doctor recommended that she receive her first Gardasil vaccine.

The trip went well, but Alexis seemed different to her mother when she returned, perhaps a bit distant. Alexis received her second Gardasil vaccine after coming home, and shortly thereafter her personality changed entirely. For a relatively shy girl, Alexis immediately became very gregarious, hugging everyone all the time. But she also became agitated and troubled, and started having difficulty keeping food down. It reached the point where she threw up a number of times a day, which is especially dangerous for a diabetic. There began a series of appointments with many, many doctors: the GP, the endocrinologist, the cardiologist, the gastroenterologist, and numerous different diagnostic tests. But nothing they did or recommended seemed to help. Alexis was struggling to get through her days, usually carrying a bucket with her at all times just in case. She had terrible insomnia, was eating excessively, and was falling further and further behind in school.

In January 2008, Alexis received her third Gardasil shot – within 2 weeks she was in the hospital. Her behavior had worsened to the point where she was considered bipolar and she was put on a series of antipsychotic medications. Her mother didn't believe that this was a psychological problem. She knew that something else had to be wrong, knew that there had to be some medical explanation for what was going on. After weeks and months in and out of different hospitals with no improvement and her condition growing more desperate, Alexis at long last was seen by a doctor who recognized that she was having seizures – something that all the previous doctors had overlooked. This led to more tests – EEGs, MRI imaging, and spinal taps – and finally a conclusion that seemed to make sense: encephalitis, traumatic brain injury, and seizure disorder. But why? Alexis's mother had an additional conclusion which was so crystal clear in hindsight – her daughter was normal before she received the Gardasil vaccine and had worsened with each one. The Gardasil vaccine had left Alexis with brain damage.

We spoke with Tracy Wolf, Alexis's mother, about their ordeal. While maintaining a cheerful optimism, Tracy admitted that she could never have foreseen how their lives would change completely. After Alexis's seizure disorder was identified and she was put on antiseizure medication, her physical symptoms improved to a certain extent, but she was completely altered. Alexis has deteriorated from being a normal child to one who is only functioning at a fourth-grade level. Forced to enter special education instead of rejoining her previous class, Alexis became enormously frustrated and school became an ordeal for everyone. When Alexis turned 18, Tracy finally gave up and pulled her out of school, realizing that it really could not offer Alexis anything but misery. The stress on their family has been enormous. The pressure caused the Wolfs' marriage to dissolve, and Tracy is now raising both daughters by herself, with their father living in a different state. Alexis needs almost constant supervision, and Tracy can only leave her alone for short periods of time. They have applied for special services that could possibly be helpful, but the waiting list is long. Alexis doesn't understand why things are so different, why her little sister is learning to drive but she can't.10

Unlike with other types of injuries, a vaccine victim cannot simply sue the company responsible for the problem. Since 1986, all cases of vaccine injury must be brought to the Office of Special Masters at the US Court of Federal Claims, commonly called the vaccine court. This court was established to create a nonadversarial situation in which children injured by vaccines could receive compensation. But the Department of Health and Human Services has completely distorted the intent of this legislation, and turned it into a highly adversarial proceeding. Injuries listed on a table are supposed to be automatically compensated, but a lot of injuries have been removed from the table over the years, and new vaccines, such as Gardasil, are listed with no specific injuries attributable to them. So the burden is on the victim to prove causation because there is no presumption of any injury.

In conversation with William Ronan, a lawyer retained by Alexis's family, he shared that his law firm currently is handling 12 to 15 Gardasil cases that are being evaluated and another 6 cases already filed in the vaccine court. Interestingly, out of all the types of Gardasil-related injuries, the cases that Ronan represents all fall into two main categories: autoimmune and neurological. When the injuries are neurological, doctors frequently can't put their finger on what is wrong, and end up sending the girls to a psychiatrist. Ronan maintains that it is impossible for all of these girls suddenly to have developed mental problems or simply to be imagining that they have been harmed since receiving the Gardasil vaccine. While not antivaccine himself, he has seen too many girls have serious adverse reactions to Gardasil. He runs a two-person law firm in Kansas City, and without advertising, has received at least 20 to 30 calls regarding Gardasil injuries. Ronan believes that his experience is just the tip of the iceberg – anyone actually advertising legal services for Gardasil victims would be inundated with a huge number of cases.

The work is slow going. Evidence of harm caused by vaccines is crucial, but there aren't a lot of published medical studies about safety to back up this claim. Those that exist are funded by the manufacturer and tend to be overly favorable. Possibly the strongest argument against Merck, according to Ronan, is its failure to warn girls of the risk involved when getting the Gardasil vaccine. Merck clearly knew that this drug could cause neurological dysfunction, yet did not adequately address this in the product insert. Also, it is well known that girls who already have an HPV infection are more likely to be harmed by the vaccine, but the manufacture does not make this clear and does not recommend testing. Ronan summed up his view of vaccinating young girls with Gardasil:
The real issue is: what is the benefit of this vaccine? Do the benefits outweigh the risks? There is a risk of a seizure disorder or an autoimmune disorder versus the benefit that it might reduce cervical cancer. But Gardasil doesn't eliminate the need for regular Pap testing, which is already safe, and there isn't good evidence that it prevents cervical cancer. In evaluating risk and benefit, when all the facts are known it becomes a pretty easy decision – the vaccine is more dangerous than any benefit. Unfortunately, medical professionals tend to read and listen to information provided by the manufacturers, which doesn't adequately present the risks involved, so they actually aren't sufficiently informed to advise their patients.
Ronan's own daughter had to fight off an aggressive attempt by her doctor to get the Gardasil vaccine, so he understands the pressure that girls are under to just go along instead of asking questions.11

We interviewed Dr. Meryl Nass, board-certified internal medicine practitioner and vaccine specialist, who agrees that Gardasil was rushed to market without adequate safety testing. Three years after approval for girls, the company likewise received approval to vaccinate boys age 9 and above with no new studies and very little data to justify this action. Regarding Gardasil's adverse effects, Nass said:
Children don't usually die suddenly when they are healthy but there are certainly lots of teenage girls who have died elatively suddenly after Gardasil or developed severe neurologic reactions. Therefore, if you are going to try to balance safety and efficacy when you prescribe something like a vaccine, you have to know how effective it's going to be. Does this really prevent cervical cancer in young women? And does it prevent it in women who have already been exposed to these viruses? … So I don't know how other doctors prescribe something like Gardasil … Basically, they make an assumption that since the FDA has licensed it … the manufacturer would only market something that's safe, doctors go ahead and prescribe. And what they may not be aware of is that it is extremely hard to link a side effect to a vaccine, for many reasons. Getting a judgment against a manufacturer is very difficult and it has become more difficult due to some recent litigation that reduced manufacturer liability for vaccines in general.12
Gardasil's doctrine is already so entrenched after only six years that it is a formidable task to challenge the official story that this vaccine is safe and effective, because the truth is too unsettling. The remarkable claims of Gardasil's benefits to women in the war on cancer are full of holes and not supported by the science, even that science funded by Merck itself. It is important to deconstruct the falsehoods and half-truths that masquerade as facts about Gardasil.

[...]

Full article: http://www.townsendletter.com/FebMarch2014/gardasil0214.html

The Truth Is In There

13th April 2014, 14:12

from a depopulation perspective it makes sense that they use vaccines on that part of the world's population that doesn't sterilize itself through cell phones, wifi and other e-smog.

avid

13th April 2014, 14:13

I have personally spoken to a very senior member of staff at the Royal Society for Public Health about this issue, and was met with adamant denial of problems - in fact, I was made to feel ignorant, and how dare I deny opportunities for health to young girls!!! Do they not research their own potential problems? Either they are courted by the Big Pharma, or they are strait-jacketed by poor 'expertise'. Ho-hum.....

Tesla_WTC_Solution

13th April 2014, 14:23

I left my autism support group (email) this morning because they tried to silence us on the vaccine issue.
Chili's was supposed to host a charity event for NAA (National Autism Association) and someone complained, because NAA has the balls to talk about needles.

I told them they were boring stupid yuppies, i hope my son grows up to be independent, it's better to be wrong than to be silent,etc...

they are bitter, vicious, all of the above, clinging to the Vaccine God King.

Hervé

13th April 2014, 14:37

Then, unfortunately, the whole cosmetic industry also got mixed up with this, in connection with vaccines:

One of he culprit: PABA

Enters that infamous name again:

In 1937, a chemist in immunology studies, Walther Goebel, at Rockefeller University reports on the urine analysis of dogs fed benzoic acid;

“When benzoic acid is ingested by dogs, it is excreted in the urine
partly in the form of hippuric acid and partly as a benzoyl ester
of glucuronic acid. The detoxication of aromatic [=benzene related] organic acids
by conjugation with glucuronic acid is one of the important physiological mechanisms of man and certain animals.” http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/122/3/649.pdf (http://www.jbc.org/cgi/reprint/122/3/649.pdf)

Clearly, this Rockefeller scientist believes that benzoic acid is toxic and has to be detoxified by the animal.

In 1943, another scientist at Rockefeller University writes a report on p-amino benzoic acid (PABA), citing that in very low doses it prevents sulfa antibiotics from working. At the time, sulfa drugs were the only antibiotics other than penicillin which was not yet in use. The scientist states that it has been shown to prevent sulfa drugs from inhibiting the growth of a strain of Clostridia. Yes, this is the same PABA chemical that was put in sunscreens.
[...]

Clearly, the utility of doing that study during the war was to figure out how to prevent the treatment of gas gangrene due to war wounds.

“one molecule of p-aminobenzoic acid antagonized 23,000 molecules of sulfanilamide” www.jem.org/cgi/reprint/78/4/255.pdf (http://www.jem.org/cgi/reprint/78/4/255.pdf)

This next article is discussing PABA as a vitamin needed for the growth of many bacteria. The bacteria need it to make folate which they require for their growth.

Humans also need folate, but they do not need PABA, and have extremely miniscule quantities of it in their bloodstream normally. The scientists in this article are proposing that a particular mutant of the Typhoid Fever producing pathogenic bacteria Salmonella typhi might make a good vaccine against Typhoid. This mutation appears to be man made in a laboratory. It is a mutation of an enzyme that helps the germ make the PABA it needs to grow, called an aro mutant. The article states that virulence of the mutant gene was restored when mice were given water laced with PABA.
[...]

Applying the sun screen before playing in contaminated water had the potential to change a pleasant afternoon into Typhoid Fever. And for a poor person in a Third World country treatment for that Typhoid Fever could cost 6 months worth of their labor and be a death sentence.

[...]
I found many pathogenic bacteria in the literature which had been turned into Aro mutants to make into live vaccines. That is, the new mutant pathogenic bacteria were assumed to be safe because they were so dependent on PABA/p-hydroxy benzoate for their growth. The research on that which I saw came from Rockefeller scientist, Rockefeller grants, or later the US Army’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Lab. The latter was controlled by the Rockefeller Family and Skull and Bones, especially the Bushes.
[...]
“Benzoic acid is also used in cosmetics (in creams and lotions with pH values under 4, up to 0.5%. Sixteen out of 71 deodorants tested contained benzoic acid.http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad26.htm#SubSectionNumber:4.2.1 (http://www.inchem.org/documents/cicads/cicads/cicad26.htm#SubSectionNumber:4.2.1)
[...]
In layman’s terms, mutant germs have been created on purpose as live vaccines. Those live germs disseminate through populations. They can still cause Typhoid Fever, diarrhea, dysentery [severe diarrhea that may include blood in the stool], pneumonia, swimmer’s ear, urinary infections, Whooping Cough, Gonorrhea, and Anthrax IF the person has p-hydroxy benzoate or PABA in their body or is immuno-compromised.
[...]
This next piece of text shows that PAB pathway, as opposed to Aro pathway mutants have been made by scientists. They also require PABA to grow. In addition, it is pointed out that it is possible to take two mutants both which look attenuated and thus safe to use for a vaccine, yet when both bacteria are present together they are able to make PABA. That is important to know because two companies making vaccines even for different pathogens could pick different locations in the pathway to target. Then if both live germs met up someplace in the world there could be a sudden outbreak of one or both of the diseases. It might look innocent and each company might claim ignorance that such a thing could happen. But in fact, that possibility is inherent in this piece of text . And any scientist who thought about it for a couple of minutes would immediately see that danger in producing such live vaccines.

[...]

The human body has plenty of amino acids in it but almost no PABA unless it is smeared on the skin. Can benzoate turn into the bacterial growth factor PABA or p-hydroxy benzoate that so that the bacteria can grow? Is that process facilitated by heating the cans?

What happens to pregnant women if they are given one of these live “attenuate” vaccines and folate prenatal vitamins together? Folate is one of the main ingredients of prenatal vitamins because it reduces neural tube birth defects like spina bifida.

Let me make this perfectly clear--PABA acted like a growth stimulant to bacteria and was classified as a vitamin--not a human vitamin though, a bacterial vitamin. People do not need it.

It was rushed into use in sun screens before proving that it prevented skin cancer. In fact, later it was incriminated as causing DNA damage likely to increase the risk of skin cancer. Was it pushed through the FDA and onto the consumer’s skin for more than just a profit motive?
[...]
Note that strains of virulent bacterial pathogens were being planned to be released upon the public on the premise that they were not harmful because they were weak mutants. They were mutants that required PABA to be virulent and cause severe disease.
It had long been known by physicians that workers who applied tar to roofs had a much higher incidence of skin cancer than their sun exposure accounted for. So, it was reckless, criminally reckless in my opinion, to put the tar-oil derivative PABA on the skin without first making sure that it did not cause cancer. Since later studies did find the PABA increased DNA damage and the likelihood of cancer, the question is why PABA was marketed as a sun screen? Since PABA is a bacterial vitamin but not a human one, it raised the unpleasant question as to whether it was marketed to increase bacterial infection. The water that people play in is often not far away from sewage outlets into it. In California, the beach water is tested in some locations to announce whether it is safe to swim in. I doubt that those testing it take into account the amount of PABA people had put on their skin.

[...]

When I thought about the US troop’s sodas sitting in the sun, I wondered what the petrochemicals turned into in the heat. I figured that the writer of that CIA internal memo might know. The writer, on investigation, turned out to be a microbiologist at the US Army’s Chemical and Biological Warfare Labs at Fort Detrick Maryland. I called him up and told him that I would like to meet with him over a cup of coffee. He agreed and we set a time and place.
[...]

In response to my questions he admitted that the water being used in Iraq was to his knowledge not the problem. He said that he wrote the memo because benzoic acid was being added to the sodas and was the “petrochemical derivative” that was of concern. He said that it was a very useful chemical to fed populations in war zones because its heat caused metabolites which increased their risk of dying from wounds and dysentery. I asked him, if that is the case, then why was it being used in sodas given the troops. He looked at me that I was dense or naive. He said, “It is there to decrease VA hospital bills.” I said, “But that is absurd.” He said, “No, think about it. If a soldier is healthy, not much happens when he drinks the sodas. But if he gets seriously wounded then he is likely to get a wound infection. Then he will die from it and not be a long term burden on the VA with an amputated leg, say.”
[...]
... You can go into an area where people are dying from dysentery and give them sodas and look like a hero. You know what the standard treatment for dysentery is now? Sodas. People consider them “safe” to drink beverages because they are sterile. Orange based sodas have the potassium in them that is needed to help replace the electrolytes. All you change is whether you heat them first as to whether you supply them to harm or help. It was truly a brilliant idea. We are really changing how we do things at the Lab. The people in the hot climates are overpopulating the world--now we can combat that effortlessly. People with AIDS in Africa, India, etc. just need a little help over the edge. We are giving them that help.”
[...]
What that “Final Solution” researcher had told me was that in the heat the Benzoate/Benzoic Acid turned into not just benzene but PABA (para-amino benzoic acid). There is some amino acids in the beverages, at least in ones with plant extracts in them. He said furthermore, some of it turns into PABA inside the human body where there are lots of amino acids and moderate heat as well. He said that the bacteria just need trace amounts of it to grow like a rocket. I said, I did not see how bacteria could grow on a crude oil slick. He said, “They can’t. But many of them grow better than ever before, when small amounts of oil is added to a lake. He said, look at all those contaminated lakes up near Detroit; people just changed their car oil and let the oil seep into the ground, or just a few drops of oil from their outboard motors got into the water. Bingo, the water is full of nasty bacteria.” He continued, “That is why the water is not drinkable in the US anymore, because it takes so little pollution by oil to make the bacteria take it over. I played skeptical and asked him to send me a paper on it. He did. I read it in some detail.

The paper was about a small town in Africa during an epidemic of cholera. Some inhabitants were given the pre-heated sodas and some were not. The town’s people were not told that they were being studied for how well they could be killed off! Both putting the benzoate in the sodas and the study were unethical in my opinion. The town folk believed that the researcher and his staff were there to help them. The mortality was 40% higher in the group given the heat treated sodas. This was not a town with a particularly high AIDS rate. Less than 10% of the people were HIV positive. The study had tested people for HIV. Those who had AIDS and cholera had a high incidence of death, about 80%, if they drank the heat treated sodas. Their mortality if they came down with cholera was high anyway, about 50%. Those with just cholera and regular sodas had less than a 2% death rate.

From Sue Arrigo's case 22B (http://avalonlibrary.net/Sue_Arrigo/).

Innocuous sunscreens and cosmetics to interact with laced vaccines and water from the "poisonned wells"... and there is the loaded gun held at the head of the female of the species of "useless eaters."

The following analogy can make it easier to understand how this works with vaccines:

Let's say that PABA is a gun that's useless since it's not loaded with bullets. The bullets corresponding to that gun are the vaccines stored somewhere and are useless too, unless loaded into the corresponding gun.

Then, comes vaccination/inoculation/lesion/infection, whether it's for flu or whatever else and the bullets get inserted into the gun, the gun is aimed and the trigger is pulled... and the whole thing is dismissed under a: "We didn't know it could happen!"... omitting to mention that it's the same company's subsidiaries which independently manufacture the bullets designed for those specific guns...

Sue Arrigo's article demonstrates that not only they do know it could happen but, moreover, it was designed to be that way and a post to follow will give a recent example/test of such "accident.".

Hervé

13th April 2014, 14:46

[...]
Took me a while to bite... but there I go: there are three main possibilities or avenues, beside vaccines, for these "other things":

On that subject, "strange" things are starting to pop-up:

Chicken vaccines combine to create deadly virus

Friday, 13 July 2012 Michael Vincent
ABC

http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/201207/r972236_10554904.jpg (http://www.abc.net.au/reslib/201207/r972236_10554928.jpg)
The vaccines that were meant to protect the chickens instead led to their deaths (Source: nardong/stock.xchng)

Lethal mix:

Australian scientists have found that two different vaccines used to control an infectious disease in chickens can recombine to create new lethal virus strains.

The research, to be published today in the journal Science (http://dx.doi.org/10.1126/science.1217134), has prompted authorities to review vaccine use in animals.

But the scientists, from the University of Melbourne (http://www.unimelb.edu.au/), say the findings are not only important for vaccines in chickens, but also for any vaccine which might be able to multiply - including those used in humans.

Chicken respiratory virus ILT can lead to birds dying in a pool of bloody mucus, but vaccines that were meant to protect them have instead led to their deaths.

Dr Joanne Devlin, a lecturer in Veterinary Public Health-Epidemiology at the Asia-Pacific Centre for Animal Health, says the deaths were caused when two vaccines used to treat the virus combined.

"These new strains were formed by recombination from the different vaccine strains and that they were actually more virulent than the vaccine strains that gave rise to them," she says.

"This is something we've never before seen before in the field."

Full article: http://www.abc.net.au/science/articles/2012/07/13/3545318.htm

This is some confirmation of the strategy exposed here:

One of he culprit: PABA

[...]

This next piece of text shows that PAB pathway, as opposed to Aro pathway mutants have been made by scientists. They also require PABA to grow. In addition, it is pointed out that it is possible to take two mutants both which look attenuated and thus safe to use for a vaccine, yet when both bacteria are present together they are able to make PABA. That is important to know because two companies making vaccines even for different pathogens could pick different locations in the pathway to target. Then if both live germs met up someplace in the world there could be a sudden outbreak of one or both of the diseases. It might look innocent and each company might claim ignorance that such a thing could happen. But in fact, that possibility is inherent in this piece of text . And any scientist who thought about it for a couple of minutes would immediately see that danger in producing such live vaccines.

Let me try to explain this problem more clearly. Suppose you have two factories that make the same guns. And suppose that you shut down the first one by not allowing them to make triggers and the second one by not allowing them to make barrels for the guns. If they work together they can share triggers and barrels they can still make guns just fine.

[...]

There!

Now they can't pretend they didn't know it could happen!

Hervé

13th April 2014, 14:52

How vicious can this get?

Have a read:

Just wondering that, in case of failure and "unforeseen" consequences, they'll blame it on cometary dusts...

Australia Determined To Vaccinate By Release Of Aerosolized GMO Vaccine (http://theviralpost.com/australia-determined-to-vaccinate-by-release-of-aerosolized-gmo-vaccine/)
December 4, 2013 -

http://theviralpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Resized-47FLB.jpg (http://theviralpost.com/wp-content/uploads/2013/12/Resized-47FLB.jpg)

The Office of the Gene Technology Regulator (OGTR) is on its way to approve a licence application from PaxVax Australia (PaxVax) for the intentional release of a GMO vaccine consisting of live bacteria into the environment in Queensland, South Australia, Western Australia and Victoria.

According to the regulator (http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir126ebnotific-htm), it qualifies as a limited and controlled release under section 50A of the Gene Technology Act 2000 (the Act).

PaxVax is seeking approval to conduct the clinical trial of a genetically modified live bacterial vaccine against cholera. Once underway the trial is expected to be completed within one year, with trial sites selected from local government areas (LGAs) in Queensland, South Australia, Victoria and Western Australia.

PaxVax has proposed a number of control measures they say will restrict the spread and persistence of the GM vaccine and its introduced genetic material, however there is always a possiblity of these restrictions failing and infecting wildlife and ecosystems.

Aerial vaccines have used in the United States directed towards animals by the use of plastic packets dropped by planes or helicopters.

Sanofi (http://en.sanofi.com/) (who is one of the largest vaccine manufacturers in the world) has subsidiary companies such as Merial Limited (http://www.merial.com/Pages/default.aspx) who manufacture Raboral (http://www.raboral.com/pdf/raboralfaq.pdf), an oral live-virus poisonous to humans yet distributed wildlife in the masses.

In 2006 Michael Greenwood wrote an article for the Yale School of Public Health entitled, “Aerial Spraying Effectively Reduces Incidence of West Nile Virus (WNV) in Humans.”

The article stated that the incidence of human West Nile virus cases can be significantly reduced through large scale aerial spraying that targets adult mosquitoes, according to research by the Yale School of Public Health and the California Department of Public Health.

Under the mandate for aerial spraying for specific vectors that pose a threat to human health, aerial vaccines known as DNA Vaccine Enhancements and Recombinant Vaccine against WNV may be tested or used to “protect” the people from vector infection exposures.

DNA vaccine enhancements specifically use Epstein-Barr viral capside’s with multi human complement class II activators to neutralize antibodies. The recombinant vaccines against WNV use Rabbit Beta-globulin or the poly (A) signal of the SV40 virus.

In early studies of DNA vaccines it was found that the negative result studies would go into the category of future developmental research projects in gene therapy.

During the studies of poly (A) signaling of the SV40 for WNV vaccines, it was observed that WNV will lie dormant in individuals who were exposed to chicken pox, thus upon exposure to WNV aerial vaccines the potential for the release of chicken pox virus would cause a greater risk to having adult onset Shingles.

CALIFORNIA AERIAL SPRAYING for WNV and SV40
In February 2009 to present date, aerial spraying for the WNV occurred in major cities within the State of California. During spraying of Anaheim, CA a Caucasian female (age 50) was exposed to heavy spraying, while doing her daily exercise of walking several miles.

Heavy helicopter activity occurred for several days in this area. After spraying, she experienced light headedness, nausea, muscle aches and increased low back pain.
She was evaluated for toxicological mechanisms that were associated with pesticide exposure due to aerial spraying utilizing advanced biological monitoring testing.

The test results which included protein band testing utilizing Protein Coupled Response (PCR) methods were positive for KD-45. KD-45 is the protein band for SV-40 Simian Green Monkey virus.

Additional tests were performed for Epstein-Barr virus capside and Cytomeglia virus which are used in bioengineering for gene delivery systems through viral protein envelope and adenoviral protein envelope technology.

The individual was positive for both; indicating a highly probable exposure to a DNA vaccination delivery system through nasal inhalation.

Pentagon Document Revealed Aerial Vaccination Plans
In the Quarterly FunVax Review in June, 2007 (http://www.wanttoknow.info/health/funvax070601.pdf), the report lists the objective of a project listed as ID: 149AZ2 as a preparation of a viral vector that will inhibit/decrease the expression of a specific disruption gene (VMAT2) within a human population.

It further indicates in the abstract that six method of virus dispersal were tested including high altitude release, water supply release, insect transmission, and various methods of diffusion.

Sources:
ogtr.gov.au (http://www.ogtr.gov.au/internet/ogtr/publishing.nsf/Content/dir126ebnotific-htm)
vactruth.com (http://vactruth.com/2010/05/11/polio-aerial-nano-delivery-systems/)
cdc.gov (http://www.cdc.gov/mmwr/preview/mmwrhtml/mm5843a2.htm)
Dave Mihalovic (http://preventdisease.com/) is a Naturopathic Doctor who specializes in vaccine research, cancer prevention and a natural approach to treatment.

... correct me if I am wrong ("down-under" fellows) but, isn't the Australian population using a lot of sunscreen lotion?

avid

13th April 2014, 15:09

It beggars belief :mad2:
We never use sunscreen, and hardly any cosmetic. Check for parabens et al.
Convincing a worried daughter-in-law that I'm not mad has been a long job, but it's sinking in. No fluoride. No aspartame. No vaccines. At every turn there is another battle to fight, but airborne cr*p is beyond the pale. God knows what's in all these chemtrails, so many people with respiratory problems now. I'm off to the COPD clinic tomorrow, as I just can't get rid of breathlessness.
NB - time to wear respirators in the garden?!!!!

Hervé

13th April 2014, 15:24

Now, why Agenda 21 and, specifically, the targeting of the females of the human species?

Well, that's a very, very old story having to do with the "Orion Model (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46424-Incarceration-as-a-form-of-vengeance&p=507187&viewfull=1#post507187)" and a total betrayal under the guise of handing out a "helping hand."

One of the "known" species to have suffered the fate of an agenda 21 of sorts under the "Orion Model (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?46424-Incarceration-as-a-form-of-vengeance&p=507187&viewfull=1#post507187)" were the "Grays":

...

"They are us from the future"

I have been chewing on that one for a very, very long while...

Beside the sci-fi versions that warp time on itself into pretzels, there is a literal way of looking at it that could be true as seen from the greys' wishful-thinking perspective.

And that comes from their own history as recounted below by Franz Erdl (http://www.psitalent.de/):

The sorrowful history of the Grays

Usually I write about my personal experiences only and avoid quoting stuff which I don't really know much about. In this case I make an exception because a book, which I read a long time ago is the missing link to our own experiences with the Grays. I forgot the name of the author, but I remember he was an US-Military remote viewer. He drew the following conclusions:

once, the Grays used to live on their own planet
they fell prey to an invasion, which they haven't been aware of
unsighted, another race (probably Reptilians) caused catastrophes on their planet
when survival on their planet was almost impossible, the intruders appeared like saviours
the condition for their "help" was the obedience of the Grays

Alex Collier goes into more details on how the greys were about to disappear as an ethnic group because the lizzies got onto their case (and planet) and turned the females of the grey's species infertile and therefore unable to reproduce and provide for "containers" for their souls. Then the lizzies stepped in and proposed the greys with their cloning technology in exchange for their subservience.

That was million if not billion years ago.

So, here we are, on earth right now... and the female of our species is being assaulted from all fronts, from forced sterilization to HPV and other vaccines as well as medications, cosmetics, GMOs, etc, to get her infertile and unable to procreate those "useless eaters" as part of "Agenda 21" AKA depopulation program.

Then, all these stories of cloning and genetic engineering, etc, to which he lizzies are touted as being the master wizards of, for their genetic manipulation feats... so that the clones they tweak have an inherent inability to display emotions to be expressed or even permit emotions to be processed.

And there we go... right where the greys were million or billion of years ago... so, indeed, they are us from the future because that's the route we are taking for us to be like them in our future IF we fall for the lizzies' scam. Hence the "wishful-thinking" part of the equation since it depends on the time-line we engage on.

This gives a better understanding as to why the suppression of teachings and knowledge about reincarnation got replaced by the "one-lifetime-shot-at eternal-salvation" inculcating that one has got only one chance to make it to paradise and OBEY or else it's straight to hell! But that, too, is too hopeful, so, lately, it's being replaced by the theory of evolution and the materialism dialectic of "You are just a body, bud, and nothing else. At the end of your life, that's that, just nothingness awaits you, so better make the most of it now!"

Don't believe me. Take a look a those materialism dialecticians' "bible," DSM-5 where any emotion expressed outside of normalized "status quo" is deemed a disorder and therefore due to some chemical imbalance as a result of some genetic flaw no one can do anything about since one is born with it and will die with it... "Here, take this pill, it'll make you feel better!" ... and we end up with people seeing nothing wrong with shooting whole school dead since it's all a video game anyway, or "maya" or "illusion," etc.

So... do we want to be "them" in our projected future?

However, it seems that some "Reptilians" also suffered the same fate:

Hopefully, what follows will make it clearer to some of you and my apologies to the ones who will find it confusing:

One Lizard fleet commander, after a lengthy session, (non hypnotic memory retrieval process) debriefed on their background. (Session date 28 September 1993.) Originally, until about 14,000 years ago, they had humanoid flesh bodies. Then a team of... experimenters, headed by a certain Sham-Too and disguised as “cultural advisors to the government”, arrived on their planet, promised eternal youth and propagated a planet-wide “youth cult”. Bodies were supposed to be immortal, always healthy and forever young. People of course responded positively to this. Illness, old age and death was not foreign to their planet at all. The cultural advisers - with the agreement of the people and its government - stationed a few satellites around the planet. Their microwave radiation activated any and all reptile-type programs in the GE (Genetic Entity, the life entity animating bodies) Pool of that planet, and as people were open and receptive to the purportedly “beneficial’’ vibrations they were taken unawares, the vibrations went in well and within a few generations of this treatment people turned half lizard, half human. Exposed to radiation for decades, their very genes eventually de-formed and the lizard characteristics became hereditary57.

[...]So, with this different perspective, "we" are back to the "Orion Model (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?30323-Simon-Parkes-about-Mantis-Aliens-Reptiles-and-other-aliens.&p=593862&viewfull=1#post593862)" and the trick performed on the Greys and the Females of Their Species (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?26599-Are-the-greys-really-evil&p=601034&viewfull=1#post601034)... except this time it was performed on the Lizzies themselves...

And of course, big red flags the size of the ones floating on and around the Kremlin with respect to these so-called "DNA improvements" about too many people around this forum have been made to long for through a repeated propaganda with respect to additional strands that would "restore" abilities and capabilities which have been hunted down and eradicated for the past 12,000 years...

[...]

avid

13th April 2014, 20:12

Much as we DON'T want-to-know, these issues must be addressed, perhaps a bit-of-a-stretch, but we are really trying to understand the bigger picture, thanks Amzer Zo for trying to put things into some sort of perspective, can 'people' be so evil? Of course 'they' can, with secret societies and vile slavery/banking agendas, but SURELY the GOOD should outwit the BAD if we are positive enough, and LOVE each other enough? Society is indoctrinated by it's own subordinance at the moment. The Media say "austerity" and we swallow that cr*p - well it's time to turn it all on it's head and take our power back. What if we say 'Stuff any debt" en masse. The whole system will be a 'fake' collapse - time to take our future into our own hands. It has been done before - prepare to take to task the usurers, or annihilate them.

Hervé

15th April 2014, 14:57

Gardasil will be the biggest scandal in medical history (http://hpv-vaccine-info.org/gardasil-will-be-the-biggest-scandal-in-medical-history/)

Home (http://hpv-vaccine-info.org) » Anden oplysning (http://hpv-vaccine-info.org/category/anden-oplysning/) » English articles (http://hpv-vaccine-info.org/category/anden-oplysning/english-articles/) » Gardasil will be the biggest scandal in medical history
By admin (http://hpv-vaccine-info.org/author/admin/) on April 14, 2014.

http://hpv-vaccine-info.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/04/BernardDalbergueGardasil.jpg

Former Merck doctor predicts that Gardasil will be the biggest scandal in medical history.

The former Merck doctor, French Dr. Bernard Dalbergue, was interviewed for the magazine Principe de Santé (Health Principles) in April this year, and in that interview he talks about his experiences in the pharmaceutical industry. After some tough years as a doctor in a hospital, Dr. Bernard Dalbergue quickly became seduced by the convenience of work in the pharmaceutical industry. Less yelling, pain and death. The latest fashion, fancy cars, money and embezzlement became part of his new life instead. Right up until his conscience, after 20 years in the pharmaceutical laboratories, woke him up and he wrote all his experiences in a book.

Le Gardasil sera le plus grand scandale de tous les temps (http://ddata.over-blog.com/xxxyyy/3/27/09/71/2012-2013/Juin-2013/Dr-Dalbergue--Gardasil--plus-grand-scandale-de-tous-les-tem.pdf)

In the interview Dr. Bernard Dalbergue talks about his surprise at how Marcia Angell, former head of the respected New England Journal of Medicine, left her job because she believed that the pharmaceutical industry manipulated the clinical research and controlled all the information that got to public attention. She, like many others, claimed that scientific studies that on the surface was described as objective and independent, was actually written by the pharmaceutical industry.

In the interview he also explains that each year between 18,000-30,000 die in France directly as a result of adverse reactions to pharmaceutical products and the figure for the whole of the EU is about 200,000. He explains that there are no clinical studies that will document the safety of a product, like Merck is trying to tell people in the case of Gardasil, it is only after millions of doses have been distributed that you will see how dangerous a product is. Therefore, he says without hesitation:

“Gardasil will be the biggest scandal in medical history,” and he adds: “The full extent of the Gardasil scandal needs to be assessed. Everyone knew when this vaccine was released on the American market that it would prove to be worthless. Diane Harper, a major opinion leader in the United States, was one of the first to blow the whistle, pointing out the fraud and scam of it all.”

Dr. Bernard Dalbergue mentions another example of how the pharmaceutical industry has deceived the public; Mercks anti-inflammatory product, Vioxx, proved to have serious side effects, including cardiac arrest, and Merck used a lot of effort to conceal the more than 30,000 deaths due to side effects. Immediately thereafter, they started to develop a similar new product, called Arcoxia, where they just changed a few molecules, and while people still died from Vioxx, which at the time had been revoked, doctors began to prescribe the new and equally dangerous product.

“Arcoxia is now being prescribed and approved, but it is extremely dangerous. It’s the same with Gardasil; it is useless and costs a fortune. In addition, decision makers at all levels are aware of it.”

He recognizes that all vaccines have side effects, that all vaccines can cause guillain-barre syndrome, paralysis, mutiple sclerosis and acute disseminated encephalomyelitis, but when it comes to saving millions from smallpox and polio then it is a different matter:

“I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers.”

On the question of why Gardasil is not just withdrawn from the market, the answer is short:

“There is far too much financial interest for these medicines to be withdrawn.”

Towards the end of the interview, Dr. Bernard Dalbergue draws a parallel between the pharmaceutical industry and the system we have built, to the political system in China: “In China, opponents are executed with a single shot of a bullet to the neck and executions are broadcast on television. Worse still, the victim’s families are made to pay for the bullet used. In my opinion, these 18,000 to 30,000 deaths by medicines are exactly the same – the patients are made to pay for the bullet which kills them.”

The story about Dr. Bernard Dalbergue has also been published in Le Monde and the article can be read via the link below.

Les pratiques du laboratoire pharmaceutique Merck en accusation (http://www.lemonde.fr/economie/article/2014/02/04/un-ancien-de-merck-denonce-les-pratiques-du-laboratoire_4359560_3234.html)

Hervé

29th May 2014, 16:42

Activist Moms Confront EPA About Roundup Herbicide (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/activist-moms-confront-epa-about-roundup-herbicide_052014)

Lily Dane The Daily Sheeple (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/)
May 27th, 2014

http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Monsanto.png (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/wp-content/uploads/2012/04/Monsanto.png)

Roundup is Monsanto’s best-selling herbicide product, and it contains a toxic ingredient known as glyphosate.

It is widely known that glyphosate is profoundly damaging to human health. Two major peer-reviewed studies (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/despite-irrefutable-evidence-of-toxicity-and-death-monsantos-friends-at-the-epa-raise-allowable-glysophate-levels_062013) showed links to breast cancer cell proliferation and intestinal and gut damage, which can lead to diseases such as diabetes, gastrointestinal disorders, heart disease, obesity, autism, Parkinson’s and Alzheimer’s.

Research conducted in 2010 suggests that glyphosate may be linked to birth defects (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/governments-ignore-definitive-proof-that-round-up-causes-birth-defects_012014).

Regulators – and of course, Monsanto – claim glyphosate is excreted from the body. But studies disproved that (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/3-studies-proving-toxic-glyphosate-found-in-urine-blood-and-even-breast-milk_052014): the chemical has been detected in urine samples, blood samples, and even breast milk.

Today, regulators from the Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) met with a group of mothers, scientists, environmentalists and others who say they are worried about Roundup residues found in breast milk.

That meeting is a result of the persistence of a group called Moms Across America (http://www.momsacrossamerica.com/about), a national coalition of mothers whose mission is to increase awareness of GMOs. They are demanding a recall of Roundup.
“This is a poison and it’s in our food. And now they’ve found it in breast milk,” said (http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/27/us-monsanto-roundup-epa-idUSKBN0E71US20140527?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews) Zen Honeycutt, founder of Moms Across America. “Numerous studies show serious harm to mammals. We want this toxic treadmill of chemical cocktails in our food to stop.”
Glyphosate is under a standard registration review by the EPA. The agency’s deadline for determining if glyphosate use should continue as is, be limited, or halted altogether is in 2015.

Despite the evidence that the ingredient is harmful to health, the government not only hasn’t banned its use – it has actually permitted an increase (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/despite-irrefutable-evidence-of-toxicity-and-death-monsantos-friends-at-the-epa-raise-allowable-glysophate-levels_062013) in the allowed glyphosate levels in consumable goods – and declared the new threshold “minimally toxic.”

And the chemical doesn’t only harm people – environmentalists, consumer groups and plant scientists from several countries have said (http://www.reuters.com/article/2014/05/27/us-monsanto-roundup-epa-idUSKBN0E71US20140527?feedType=RSS&feedName=domesticNews) in recent years that heavy use of glyphosate is causing problems for plants and animals as well.

In 2011, U.S. government scientists said they detected significant levels of glyphosate in air and water samples.

Yet, widespread use of the product is still allowed.

Considering the revolving door for employees (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/governments-ignore-definitive-proof-that-round-up-causes-birth-defects_012014) of the government and Monsanto, should we really expect the EPA to do anything about protecting us from this toxin?

The EPA has a long history of colluding with and protecting industry.

In fact, a recently-released book written by a former EPA employee exposes the agency’s corruption and disregard for the safety of the American public.

The book, called Poison Spring: The Secret History of Pollution and the EPA (http://seattletimes.com/html/books/2023340701_poisonspringxml.html), details the case of whistleblower Cate Jenkins, an EPA scientist who brought attention to what she considered to be Monsanto’s fraudulent claim that exposure to dioxin did not cause cancer in workers.

Author E. G. Vallianatos worked for the EPA for 25 years, and saw firsthand (http://seattletimes.com/html/books/2023340701_poisonspringxml.html) not only the science that found toxicity in the pesticides Big Agriculture has been applying to crops, but how those discoveries played out within a highly politicized EPA over five presidential administrations.

I wish that group of mothers luck, and admire them for their tenacity and dedication, but I don’t expect the FDA – one of the most corrupt (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/american-extermination-death-for-sale-in-every-aisle_102012) and overreaching (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/epa-proposing-biggest-land-grab-in-the-history-of-the-world-wants-control-over-everything_042014) government agencies in existence today – to care what citizens want or think.

However, raising awareness and making our voices heard are steps in the right direction, and are certainly far better than being complacent and apathetic victims of big industry and increasing government corruption.

Delivered by The Daily Sheeple (http://www.TheDailySheeple.com/)

Contributed by Lily Dane of The Daily Sheeple (http://www.thedailysheeple.com/). Lily Dane is a staff writer for The Daily Sheeple. Her goal is to help people to “Wake the Flock Up!”

SOTT-Comment: (http://www.sott.net/article/279807-Moms-across-American-confront-EPA-about-the-safety-of-the-Roundup-herbicide)

Why Does Monsanto Always Win? Answer: They've rigged the game (http://www.sott.net/article/248956-Why-Does-Monsanto-Always-Win-Answer-They-ve-rigged-the-game)
Just One of Monsanto's Crimes, Or Why We Can't Trust the EPA (http://www.sott.net/article/244007-Just-One-of-Monsantos-Crimes-Or-Why-We-Cant-Trust-the-EPA)
Monsanto's Deep Roots in Washington (http://www.sott.net/article/246615-Monsantos-Deep-Roots-in-Washington)
Monsanto Executive Appointed to High Level Position in the FDA (http://www.sott.net/article/223234-Monsanto-Executive-Appointed-to-High-Level-Position-in-the-FDA)
A Government of Monsanto, by Monsanto, and for Monsanto (http://www.sott.net/article/227675-A-Government-of-Monsanto-by-Monsanto-and-for-Monsanto)

Hervé

29th May 2014, 17:21

How “Extreme Levels” of Roundup in Food Became the Industry Norm (http://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/how-extreme-levels-of-roundup-in-food-became-the-industry-norm/)
March 24, 2014
By Thomas Bøhn and Marek Cuhra

Food and feed quality are crucial to human and animal health. Quality can be defined as sufficiency of appropriate minerals, vitamins and fats, etc. but it also includes the absence of toxins, whether man-made or from other sources. Surprisingly, almost no data exist in the scientific literature on herbicide residues in herbicide tolerant genetically modified (GM) plants, even after nearly 20 years on the market.

In research recently published by our laboratory (Bøhn et al. 2014 (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814613019201)) we collected soybean samples grown under three typical agricultural conditions: organic, GM, and conventional (but non-GM). The GM soybeans were resistant to the herbicide Roundup, whose active ingredient is glyphosate.

We tested these samples for nutrients and other compounds as well as relevant pesticides, including glyphosate and its principal breakdown product, Aminomethylphosponic acid (AMPA). All of the individual samples of GM-soy contained residues of both glyphosate and AMPA, on average 9.0 mg/kg. This amount is greater than is typical for many vitamins. In contrast, no sample from the conventional or the organic soybeans showed residues of these chemicals (Fig. 1).

http://www.independentsciencenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/image002-384.gif
Crop spraying, South Africa, Thomas Bøhn

This demonstrates that Roundup Ready GM-soybeans sprayed during the growing season take up and accumulate glyphosate and AMPA. Further, what has been considered a working hypothesis for herbicide tolerant crops, i.e. that, as resistant weeds have spread:

“there is a theoretical possibility that also the level of residues of the herbicide and its metabolites may have increased” (Kleter et al. 2011)

is now shown to be actually happening.

Monsanto (manufacturer of glyphosate) has claimed that residues of glyphosate in GM soy are lower than in conventional soybeans, where glyphosate residues have been measured up to 16-17 mg/kg (Monsanto 1999). These residues, found in non-GM plants, likely must have been due to the practice of spraying before harvest (for desiccation). Another claim of Monsanto’s has been that residue levels of up to 5.6 mg/kg in GM-soy represent

“…extreme levels, and far higher than those typically found” (Monsanto 1999).

http://www.independentsciencenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Roundup-levels-in-soybeans-300x258.png

Figure 1. Residues of glyphosate and AMPA in individual soybean samples (n=31). For organic and conventional soybeans, glyphosate residues were below the detection limit.

Seven out of the 10 GM-soy samples we tested, however, surpassed this “extreme level” (of glyphosate + AMPA), indicating a trend towards higher residue levels. The increasing use of glyphosate on US Roundup Ready soybeans has been documented (Benbrook 2012). The explanation for this increase is the appearance of glyphosate-tolerant weeds (Shaner et al. 2012) to which farmers are responding with increased doses and more applications.

Maximum residue levels (MRLs) of glyphosate in food and feed
Globally, glyphosate-tolerant GM soy is the number one GM crop plant and glyphosate is the most widely used herbicide, with a global production of 620 000 tons in 2008 (Pollak 2011). The world soybean production in 2011 was 251.5 million metric tons, with the United States (33%), Brazil (29%), Argentina (19%), China (5%) and India (4%) as the main producing countries (American Soybean Association 2013).

In 2011-2012, soybeans were planted on about 30 million hectares in the USA, with Roundup Ready GM soy contributing 93-94 % of the production (USDA 2013). Globally, Roundup Ready GM soybeans contributed to 75 % of the production in 2011 (James 2012).

The legally acceptable level of glyphosate contamination in food and feed, i.e. the maximum residue level (MRL) has been increased by authorities in countries where Roundup-Ready GM crops are produced, or where such commodities are imported. In Brazil, the MRL in soybean was increased from 0.2 mg/kg to 10 mg/kg in 2004: a 50-fold increase, but only for GM-soy. The MRL for glyphosate in soybeans has been increased also in the US and Europe. In Europe, it was raised from 0.1 mg/kg to 20 mg/kg (a 200-fold increase) in 1999, and the same MRL of 20 mg/kg was adopted by the US. In all of these cases, MRL values appear to have been adjusted, not based on new scientific evidence, but pragmatically in response to actual observed increases in the content of residues in glyphosate-tolerant GM soybeans.

Has the toxicity of Roundup been greatly underestimated?
When regulatory agencies assess pesticides for safety they invariably test only the claimed active ingredient.

Nevertheless, these do not necessarily represent realistic conditions since in practice it is the full, formulated herbicide (there are many Roundup formulations) that is used in the field. Thus, it is relevant to consider, not only the active ingredient, in this case glyphosate and its breakdown product AMPA, but also the other compounds present in the herbicide formulation since these enhance toxicity. For example, formulations of glyphosate commonly contain adjuvants and surfactants to stabilize and facilitate penetration into the plant tissue. Polyoxyethylene amine (POEA) and polyethoxylated tallowamine (POE-15) are common ingredients in Roundup formulations and have been shown to contribute significantly to toxicity (Moore et al. 2012).

Our own recent study in the model organism Daphnia magna demonstrated that chronic exposure to glyphosate and a commercial formulation of Roundup resulted in negative effects on several life-history traits, in particular reproductive aberrations like reduced fecundity and increased abortion rate, at environmental concentrations of 0.45-1.35 mg/liter (active ingredient), i.e. below accepted environmental tolerance limits set in the US (0.7 mg/liter) (Cuhra et al. 2013). A reduced body size of juveniles was even observed at an exposure to Roundup at 0.05 mg/liter.

This is in sharp contrast to world-wide regulatory assumptions in general, which we have found to be strongly influenced by early industry studies and in the case of aquatic ecotoxicity assessment, to be based on 1978 and 1981 studies presented by Monsanto claiming that glyphosate is virtually non-toxic in D. magna (McAllister & Forbis, 1978; Forbis & Boudreau, 1981).

Thus a worrisome outlook for health and the environment can be found in the combination of i) the vast increase in use of glyphosate-based herbicides, in particular due to glyphosate-tolerant GM plants, and ii) new findings of higher toxicity of both glyphosate as an active ingredient (Cuhra et al., 2013) and increased toxicity due to contributions from chemical adjuvants in commercial formulations (Annett et al. 2014).

A similar situation can be found for other pesticides. Mesnage et al. (2014) found that 8 out of 9 tested pesticides were more toxic than their declared active principles.

This means that the Accepted Daily Intake (ADI) for humans, i.e. what society finds “admissible” regarding pesticide residues may have been set too high, even before potential combinatorial effects (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/?term=PMC3035621) of different chemical exposures are taken into account.

For glyphosate formulations (Roundup), realistic exposure scenarios in the aquatic environment may harm non-target biodiversity from microorganisms, invertebrates, amphibians and fish, (reviewed in Annett et al. 2014) indicating that the environmental consequences of these agrochemicals need to be re-assessed.

Other compositional differences between GM, non-GM, and organic
Our research also demonstrated that different agricultural practices lead to markedly different end products. Data on other measured compositional characteristics could be used to discriminate statistically all individual soy samples (without exception) into their respective agricultural practice background (Fig. 2).

http://www.independentsciencenews.org/wp-content/uploads/2014/03/Grouping-soybeans-size.png
Figure 2. Discriminant analysis for GM, conventional and organic soy samples based on 35 variables. Data was standardized (mean = 0 and SD = 1).

Organic soybeans showed the healthiest nutritional profile with more glucose, fructose, sucrose and maltose, significantly more total protein, zinc and less fiber, compared with both conventional and GM-soy. Organic soybeans contained less total saturated fat and total omega-6 fatty acids than both conventional and GM-soy.

Conclusion
Roundup Ready GM-soy accumulates residues of glyphosate and AMPA, and also differs markedly in nutritional composition compared to soybeans from other agricultural practices. Organic soybean samples also showed a more healthy nutritional profile (e.g. higher in protein and lower in saturated fatty acids) than both industrial conventional and GM soybeans.

Lack of data on pesticide residues in major crop plants is a serious gap of knowledge with potential consequences for human and animal health. How is the public to trust a risk assessment system that has overlooked the most obvious risk factor for herbicide tolerant GM crops, i.e. high residue levels of herbicides, for nearly 20 years? If it has been due to lack of understanding, it would be bad. If it is the result of the producer’s power to influence the risk assessment system, it would be worse.

References
American Soy Association, Soystats. 2013. 16-5-2013.
Annett, R., Habibi, H. R. and Hontela, A. 2014. Impact of glyphosate and glyphosate-based herbicides on the freshwater environment. – Journal of Applied Toxicology DOI 10.1002/jat.2997.
Aumaitre, L. A. 2002. New feeds from genetically modified plants: substantial equivalence, nutritional equivalence and safety for animals and animal products. – Productions Animales 15: 97-108.
Benbrook, C. M. 2012. Impacts of genetically engineered crops on pesticide use in the U.S. – the first sixteen years. – Environmental Science Europe 24:24.
Binimelis, R., Pengue, W. and Monterroso, I. 2009. “Transgenic treadmill”: Responses to the emergence and spread of glyphosate-resistant johnsongrass in Argentina. – Geoforum 40: 623-633.
Bøhn, T., Cuhra, M., Traavik, T., Sanden, M., Fagan, J. and Primicerio, R. 2014. Compositional differences in soybeans on the market: Glyphosate accumulates in Roundup Ready GM soybeans (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0308814613019201). – Food Chemistry 153: 207-215.
Cuhra, M., Traavik, T. and Bøhn, T. 2013. Clone- and age-dependent toxicity of a glyphosate commercial formulation and its active ingredient in Daphnia magna. – Ecotoxicology 22: 251-262 (open access). DOI 10.1007/s10646-012-1021-1.
Duke, S. O., Rimando, A. M., Pace, P. F., Reddy, K. N. and Smeda, R. J. 2003. Isoflavone, glyphosate, and aminomethylphosphonic acid levels in seeds of glyphosate-treated, glyphosate-resistant soybean. – Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 51: 340-344.
EC . Review report for the active substance glyphosate. 6511/VI/99-final, 1-56. 2002. European Commission. Health and Consumer Protection Directorate-General.
Forbis, A.D., Boudreau, P. 1981. Acute toxicity of MON0139 (Lot LURT 12011)(AB-81-074) To Daphnia magna: Static acute bio- assay report no. 27203. Unpublished study document from US EPA library
Harrigan, G. G., Ridley, G., Riordan, S. G., Nemeth, M. A., Sorbet, R., Trujillo, W. A., Breeze, M. L. and Schneider, R. W. 2007. Chemical composition of glyphosate-tolerant soybean 40–3-2 grown in Europe remains equivalent with that of conventional soybean (Glycine max L.). – Journal of Agricultural and Food Chemistry 55: 6160-6168.
James, C. Global Status of Commercialized Biotech/GM Crops: 2012. ISAAA Brief No. 44. 2012. ISAAA: Ithaca, NY.
Kleter, G. A., Unsworth, J. B. and Harris, C. A. 2011. The impact of altered herbicide residues in transgenic herbicide-resistant crops on standard setting for herbicide residues. – Pest Management Science 67: 1193-1210.
McAllister, W., Forbis A. 1978. Acute toxicity of technical glyphosate (AB–78–201) to Daphnia magna. Study reviewed and approved 8–30–85 by EEB/HED
Mesnage, R., Defarge, N., Vendômois, J. S. and Seralini, G. E. 2014. Major pesticides are more toxic to human cells than their declared active principles. – BioMed Research International http://dx.doi.org/10.1155/2014/179691.
Monsanto . Residues in Roundup Ready soya lower than conventional soy. http://www.monsanto.co.uk/news/99/june99/220699_residue.html . 1999.
Moore, L. J., Fuentes, L., Rodgers, J. H., Bowerman, W. W., Yarrow, G. K., Chao, W. Y. and Bridges, W. C. 2012. Relative toxicity of the components of the original formulation of Roundup (R) to five North American anurans. – Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety 78: 128-133.
Pollak, P. 2011. Fine chemicals: the industry and the business. – Wiley.
Shaner, D. L., Lindenmeyer, R. B. and Ostlie, M. H. 2012. What have the mechanisms of resistance to glyphosate taught us? – Pest Management Science 68: 3-9.
USDA . National Agricultural Statistics Service. 2013. 16-5-2013.

The Authors:
Thomas Bøhn
GenØk – Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway
Professor of Gene Ecology, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway
Marek Cuhra
GenØk – Centre for Biosafety, Tromsø, Norway
PhD student, Faculty of Health Sciences, UiT The Arctic University of Norway

Comment:
Michelle Denise says: March 31, 2014 at 7:22 am (http://www.independentsciencenews.org/news/how-extreme-levels-of-roundup-in-food-became-the-industry-norm/#comment-20116)
We in Australia are just taking up GM. Within a couple of years we have had non-GM farms and organic farms contaminated. The agenda is to contaminate. Any number of petitions have been ignored. Luckily some farmers are waking up to the glyphosate and resistance problems as well as increased costs and decreased yields of GM – these farmers are not planting GM canola this year. However the pressure on non GM farmers and non-GM states in Australia is being applied. Monsanto has the ear of our governments. In Western Australia Monsanto has taken over 26% of our public grain research facility, Intergrain and they are vying for another 20%. Monsanto is also trying to get GM wheat tested in Australia. They have taken over some of our university agricultural research departments as well. Unfortunately most of our population don’t care or can’t see the danger to our own viable wheat industy, and our health.

SOTT-Comment: (http://www.sott.net/article/279801-Agriculture-industry-norm-Extreme-levels-of-Roundup-in-food) The author's of the article ask an important question in the conclusion of their study 'How is the public to trust a risk assessment system that has overlooked the most obvious risk factor for herbicide tolerant GM crops, i.e. high residue levels of herbicides?' The links below can answer the author's questions. It becomes obvious, based on published data, that the biotech industry KNOWs the obvious risk factor of herbicide tolerant GM crops:

Are you inflamed over GMO foods? (http://www.sott.net/article/273788-Are-you-inflamed-over-GMO-foods)
Death by Multiple Poisoning, Glyphosate and Roundup (http://www.sott.net/article/180255-Death-by-Multiple-Poisoning-Glyphosate-and-Roundup)
How GMO farming and food is making our gut flora unfriendly (http://www.sott.net/article/260280-How-GMO-farming-and-food-is-making-our-gut-flora-unfriendly)
Study: Roundup and other pesticides directly linked to Parkinson's and neurodegenerative disorders (http://www.sott.net/article/253106-Study-Roundup-and-other-pesticides-directly-linked-to-Parkinsons-and-neurodegenerative-disorders)
Is Monsanto's Herbicide Harming Male Fertility? (http://www.sott.net/article/239782-Is-Monsantos-Herbicide-Harming-Male-Fertility)
Monsanto's Best-Selling Herbicide Roundup Linked to Infertility (http://www.sott.net/article/240476-Monsantos-Best-Selling-Herbicide-Roundup-Linked-to-Infertility)
Extreme toxicity of Roundup destroys GMO/Non-GMO 'substantial equivalence' argument (http://www.sott.net/article/264209-Extreme-toxicity-of-Roundup-destroys-GMO-Non-GMO-substantial-equivalence-argument)
Monsanto's Infertility-Linked Roundup Found in All Urine Samples Tested (http://www.sott.net/article/240662-Monsantos-Infertility-Linked-Roundup-Found-in-All-Urine-Samples-Tested)

avid

29th May 2014, 17:38

I have just had a long talk with Tesco (UK) Customer Services about their promotion of Roundup, wiping a leaf with it's 'gel' and a terrible death to the plant. However, if a pet or a child gets this stuff on them, what happens to them? Toxic, carcinogenic - absolutely criminal irreverance to life by Monsanto. Proven to be dangerous. Banned in lots of countries. Why allow it in the UK? Why are Tesco heavily promoting it on the TV, and why are the Co-operative Supermarkets (supposedly very 'green') in the UK selling this vile stuff?

Have also copied this to Cooperative Stores in the UK, via their customer services.

Lifebringer

29th May 2014, 19:58

Monster powers that were, BE GONE!
In the name of all that is holy the son of God and Creator, please rid us of these evil people.
How long Father?
How long the suffering of the whole of man, for the few corrupt maladjusted and heartless, loveless souls who have money?
Are these money changers to use us as plastic soldiers on some corporate boardroom game?
Is this "not" allowed in the freedom of choice, without justice to those whose choice is to hurt your creations?
Father come and protect us in the name of your son Jesus the Christ of justice.

Hervé

20th September 2014, 17:57

Vaccines and depopulation experiments (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/now-we-come-to-vaccines-and-depopulation-experiments/)

Jon Rappoport
WordPress (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/15/now-we-come-to-vaccines-and-depopulation-experiments/)
Mon, 15 Sept., 2014 00:00 CEST
SOTT.net reblog: http://www.sott.net/article/285879-Vaccines-and-depopulation-experiments

"When the State offers and even insists on giving everybody something, you know you're in trouble. Well, that's the whole point, isn't it? Leaving the individual out of the equation. Treating the population like a single Blob." (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

http://www.sott.net/image/s10/206600/full/global_depopulation_poster.jpg
© www.dailystormer.com (http://www.dailystormer.com)
So many folks, so many ways, so little time...

Before we get to vaccines, I want to give you a quote about fluorides, just to set the stage.

Stan Freni is a researcher who, in 1994, wrote a paper about fluorides, the substances in many toothpastes, also pumped intentionally into the drinking water of many communities and cities. Funny thing is, Stan Freni wrote his paper as an employee for the US Food and Drug Administration (FDA).

The title of the paper is "Exposure to High Fluoride Concentrations in Drinking Water is Associated With Decreased Birth Rates." (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/8169995) It was published in the Journal of Toxicology and Environmental Health (v.42,pp.109-121, 1994). Freni writes:

"A US database of drinking water systems was used to identify index counties with water systems reporting fluoride levels of at least 3ppm (parts per million)...the annual total fertility rate (TFR) for women in the age range 10-49 yr. was calculated for the period 1970-1988...Most regions showed an association of decreasing TFR with increasing fluoride levels." Increasing fluoride levels, lower fertility rates. Depopulation here in the US, right in your water. So don't imagine depopulation is an esoteric subject.

Let's move on.

You have to understand that every promoted so-called "pandemic" is an extended sales pitch for vaccines. And not just a vaccine against the "killer germ" of the moment. We're talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general.

http://www.sott.net/image/s10/206606/medium/kissinger_depopulation_highest.jpg (http://www.sott.net/image/s10/206606/full/kissinger_depopulation_highest.jpg)
© socioecohistory.wordpress.com

"... the true concern of Kissinger analysts was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the 'political consequences' of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability ... With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] 'the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.'" In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people.

SOTT.net Comment:
Memorandum 200 was adopted as official U.S. policy by President Gerald Ford in 1975. Thirteen countries were named in the report as particularly problematic with respect to U.S. security interests and mineral resources: India, Bangladesh, Pakistan, Indonesia, Thailand, the Philippines, Turkey, Nigeria, Egypt, Ethiopia, Mexico, Colombia and Brazil. These countries were projected to create 47 percent of all world population growth. It also raised the question of whether the U.S. should consider preferential allocation of surplus food supplies to states that are deemed constructive in use of population control measures.
Does this remind you of what is happening in West Africa now, re "the Ebola crisis?" Lockdown. Borders sealed. Over the past five years, several vaccine campaigns - and who knows what other vectors for the transmission of toxic elements to the population.

Cockburn notes that the writers of the Kissinger memo "favored sterilization over food aid." He goes on to say that "By 1977, Reimart Ravenholt, the director of USAID's [US Agency for International Development] population program, was saying that his agency's goal was to sterilize one-quarter of the world's women."

There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs - which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age - involved multiple injections.

Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations - such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine. My inquiries to Philippine officials went unanswered.

The Population Research Institute, in the November/December 1996 issue of its Review, published a report by David Morrison.

Morrison stated, "Philippine women may have been unwittingly vaccinated against their own children, a recent study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) has indicated."The study tested random samples of a tetanus vaccine for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential to the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy ... The PMA's positive test results indicate that just such an abortifacient may have been administered to Philippine women without their consent.

"The PMA notified the Philippine Department of Health (PDOH) of these findings in a 16 September letter signed by the researchers and certified by its President. Using an immunological assay developed by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, a three-doctor research panel tested forty-seven vials of tetanus vaccine collected at random from various health centers in Luzon and Mindanao. Nine were found to contain hCG in levels ranging from 0.191680 mIU/ml to 3.046061 mIU/ml. These vaccines, most of which were labeled as of Canadian origin, were supplied by the World Health Organization as part of a WHO-sponsored [sterilization] vaccination program."
http://www.sott.net/image/s10/206637/full/Womanhood_Stolen.jpg
© thegundeck.blogspot.com

Healthy 16-year-old Aussi whose womanhood has been stolen by Gardasil, now in menopause, her ovaries irrevocably shut down.

Morrison's article would seem to indicate that the vials of vaccine tested came from a widespread immunization campaign rather than from a small pilot study of a few women.

The Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation was created at the World Health Organization in 1973. Ute Sprenger, writing in Biotechnology and Development Monitor (December 1995) describes the Task Force:

"...a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D...such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG."
Sprenger indicates that, as of 1995, there were several large groups researching these vaccines. Among them:

* WHO/HRP. HRP is the Special Progamme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, located in Switzerland. It is funded by "the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank."

* The Population Council. It's a US group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health [a US federal agency], and the US Agency for International Development [USAID, notorious for its collaborations with the CIA].

* National Institute of Immunology. Located in India, "major funders are the Indian government, the Canadian International Development Research Center and the [ubiquitous] Rockefeller Foundation."

* The Center for Population Research, located at the US National Institute of Child Health and Development [!], which is part of the US National Institutes of Health.

[I]The Lancet, 4 June, 1998, p.1272: "During the recent National Immunisation Campaign (vaccination for childhood diseases and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women), in some villages [of Thailand] the women escaped and hid in the bushes thinking that they were going to be given injections to stop them having children."

AP, Boston Globe, October 10, 1992, "Birth-control vaccine is reported in India": "Scientists said yesterday they have created the first birth-control shot for women, effective for an entire year...[after which] a booster shot is needed." There are other citations from published medical literature - but you get the idea: vaccines as depopulation instruments.

And the hCG versions I refer to appear to be crude efforts. Who knows what levels of sophistication have been achieved in secret?

West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu, Ebola - the real motive for promoting these "pandemics" is the follow-up: vaccines.

To a highly significant degree, the CDC and the World Health Organization are PR agencies, whose job is to convince the public that stepping up, rolling up their sleeves, and submitting to shots containing germs and toxic chemicals is the most natural and wise action possible.

Yes, and ignorance is strength.

The Matrix is designed inside out and upside down.

Jon Rappoport

Jon Rappoport is the author of three explosive collections, THE MATRIX REVEALED (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/the-matrix-revealed-vol-1-cd-by-jon-rappoport-mega-info/), EXIT FROM THE MATRIX (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/exit-from-the-matrix/), and POWER OUTSIDE THE MATRIX (http://marketplace.mybigcommerce.com/power-outside-the-matrix/). Nominated for a Pulitzer Prize, he has worked as an investigative reporter for 30 years, writing articles on politics, medicine, and health.

SOTT.net Comment:

President Obama's top science and technology advisor John P. Holdren co-authored a 1977 book, Ecoscience, in which he advocated the formation of a "planetary regime" that would use a "global police force" to enforce totalitarian measures of population control, including forced abortions, mass sterilization programs conducted via the food and water supply, as well as mandatory bodily implants that would prevent couples from having children. Proposed or already covertly being implemented:

- Forcibly and unknowingly sterilizing the entire population by adding infertility drugs to the nation's water and food supply.

- Legalizing "compulsory abortions," ie forced abortions carried out against the will of the pregnant women, as is common place in Communist China where women who have already had one child and refuse to abort the second are kidnapped off the street by the authorities before a procedure is carried out to forcibly abort the baby.

- Babies who are born out of wedlock or to teenage mothers to be forcibly taken away from their mother by the government and put up for adoption. Another proposed measure would force single mothers to demonstrate to the government that they can care for the child, effectively introducing licensing to have children.

- Implementing a system of "involuntary birth control," where both men and women would be mandated to have an infertility device implanted into their body at puberty and only have it removed temporarily if they received permission from the government to have a baby.

- Permanently sterilizing people who the authorities deem have already had too many children or who have contributed to "general social deterioration".

- Formally passing a law that criminalizes having more than two children, similar to the one child policy in Communist China.

- This would all be overseen by a transnational and centralized "planetary regime" that would utilize a "global police force" to enforce the measures outlined above. The "planetary regime" would also have the power to determine population levels for every country in the world.

Off-topic FYI: This issue is more prescient than ever because Holdren and his colleagues are now at the forefront of efforts to combat "climate change" through similarly insane programs focused around geoengineering the planet. Holdren recently advocated "Large-scale geoengineering projects designed to cool the Earth," such as "shooting pollution particles into the upper atmosphere to reflect the sun's rays," which many have pointed out is already occurring via chemtrails.

Obama Science Advisor Called For "Planetary Regime" To Enforce Totalitarian Population Control Measures (http://www.whale.to/b/obama9.html)

Other links:

[2014 March] Tetanus Vaccines Sterilizing Women In Kenya? Catholic Church There Raises Suspicions (http://www.whale.to/c/tetanus_vaccines.html)

[2012 Oct] Gardasil Destroys Girl's Ovaries: It Should Have Been Predicted (http://www.whale.to/v/gardasil88.html)

[2012 June] Rockefeller Foundation Admitted Funding, Developing Anti-fertility Vaccines Intended for "Mass-scale Distribution" (http://www.whale.to/c/rockefeller.html)

[2011 Nov] UN, Bill Gates Foundation Push Deadly HPV Shots on Poor Nations Under 'GAVI Alliance' by Anthony Gucciardi (http://www.whale.to/c/gates.html)

[2010 Nov. Gardasil testimony. MS. BOYCE] Vaccines and Related Biological Products Advisory Committee Meeting Transcript (http://www.whale.to/v/boyce.html)

[2010 Sept] Death by Vaccination: The Gates Foundation and the New Eugenics by Richard Gale & Gary Null (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/death_by_vaccination.html)

[2009 July Swine flu vaccine] Natural Solutions Alert by Gabriel Cousens, M.D. (http://www.whale.to/a/cousens1.html)

[Aug 2008] Massive Brazilian Vaccination Raises Suspicions of Covert Sterilization Program (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/braz.html)

[2008] Polysorbate 80 Causes Infertility by Joanna Karpasea-Jones (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/polysorbate.html)

[Video] Mercury, Autism and the Global Vaccine Agenda David Ayoub, M.D. (http://www.whale.to/vaccine/ayoub_v.html)

and there are a slew more of these! What's in YOUR water?

Cidersomerset

20th September 2014, 18:41

Related articles on Davids site....

Activist Post......

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-7uuhFwBdhRo/VBrvKEVOudI/AAAAAAAAf_0/lLGD-xK1TA8/s1600/trojhorse_dees.jpg

U.N. Agenda 21 Testing Ground: Malaysia’s 10 Ideas For Sustainable Development
Friday 19th September 2014 at 08:01 By david-icke

‘The full implementation of Agenda 21 is nearing completion as the global
Sustainable Development Goals of the United Nations are set on a 2015 timeline.
There are already many hints available at the wide-scale transformation set to take
place, as multiple locations in the United States continue doing battle with the
arrival of sweeping bureaucratic code enforcement.

Agenda 21 is a U.N.-directed action plan that has so many tentacles, it is often
difficult to see this creature in its entirety. Essentially, using the threat of climate
change and overpopulation as core global concerns, a mountain of new regulations
forcing local communities to adopt global directives will usher in global governance
literally from the ground up.

http://www.activistpost.com/2014/09/un-agenda-21-testing-ground-malaysias.html

Cidersomerset

21st September 2014, 15:46

This was a scary little vid that popped up while I was googling.....

9_lsX4GBXE0

The Mindset of the Ruling Elite - Depopulation
.
Uploaded on 23 Apr 2011

Those running (ruining) the world today, think in exactly the same way as
Bernard Shaw and all the other Eugenicists of the 19th / 20th centuries.

Vaccines, Fluoridated Water, Bisphenol A in plastics, Pesticides, Soya
(so-called "health food") and Genetically Modified foods, can cause Sterility
in humans. And they're all promoted from the very same people who believe
that the earth is overpopulated. Are they secretly Sterilizing the population?
A chemical assault upon humanity?

Listen to Bill Gates say that Vaccines will be used to lower Population:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=i-lqDM...

Cidersomerset

21st September 2014, 15:55

Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

Sunday 21st September 2014 at 05:33 By david-icke

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/logo-top1.png

Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

Eugenics
Social Engineering

by Zen Gardner - Sep 20, 2014

http://www.davidicke.com/wordpress/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/UN-Agenda2-448x6401.jpg

‘Let’s suppose the elitist scum working to ruin and control our lives and planet are in
some fashion real people to some extent. I know, a stretch, but let’s try. So how can
they perpetrate such horrors on humanity? How could such madness be justified in the
minds of men, however psychopathic?

Actually, it’s easy. For self promotion, preservation and power they’ve allowed themselves
to be convinced the power is theirs and the right thing to do. But what’s their fundamental
tenet for mass murder?

Everything they think and believe is a fabricated bastardization and reversal of any real
Truth, but in their minds they’ve decided this wicked, inhuman illuminist takeover makes
sense to them. Especially with their fat cheeks being firmly ensconced in the seats of power.’

Oh, the vestiges of their human conscience may give some of them a nudge in some cases,
but it’s been shut down almost completely for most of them. It has to be. You can’t have
empathy and wreak such death dealing havoc on nature and humanity.

If you’ve ever known or observed a pathological liar, this cauterized mindset is their way of
life. Politicians do it without the slightest compunction. To them it’s part of the job description
for ruling the unwashed masses. How is it justified logically? The old “necessary evil” ruse, as
in the justification for 9/11 and myriad of other actions.

The even more amazing thing is that they smugly revel in this ugliness, thinking they’re the “good guys”.

Convincing the Cattle to Die – Eugenics Justifies All

Think about it. What a slam dunk for world domination to so twist perception to where humanity
is the problem that needs to be curtailed by draconian controls while being systematically
exterminated like a pest infestation. Be it engineered wars, poverty and food shortages; drugging,
corrupted food, and water; dumbed down information and media, or injecting toxins in our bodies,
all is fair game to them.

Eugenics is the “tie that binds”, the glue that holds all the other lies conveniently together. And it
takes the sting out of outright mass murder. For them. It’s a “cleaning” and “preparation” for their
desired world to come.

Look what Agenda 21 controls are perpetrated via things like climate change and CO2 fabrications.
Sure, we’re in the throes of massive climate extremes for many reasons, many of them geoengineered,
but to blame it on cattle flatulence and human breathing must be some kind of macabre inside joke.
Bottom line is they are planning a great “culling of the herd” and need our permission. We’ve read
about it for decades in their elitist writings, and this is how they justify it and hope to convince us as
much as possible of the same. That’s the alert.

Remember, not waking up and saying no is ultimately humanity’s imprimatur that it agrees. That’s
where empowerment comes in. We can say no and reverse all this, just as we’ve done in many instances.
But the awakened shout out needs to be immediate and insistent.

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/eugenicstree-e1411238329985.jpg

A Little Background

As eugenics, called the “self-direction of human evolution”, grew out of its inception in the 1800’s,
it was considered the harmonious result of all branches of science. The US was the first to implement
eugenics programs as early as 1908 and it gained a lot of popularity and traction. What stopped it in
its tracks, at least in public opinion, was the Nazi implementation of eugenics during WW2 to the obvious
horror of all, however backed by the American program and exaggerated by Zionists.

This would later turn out to be an amazingly cunning pre-planned propaganda tool as we’ll discuss below.

But now look how this eugenics campaign has been revived and is currently perpetrated. With innocuous
sounding names like Planned Parenthood to the UN’s dastardly Agenda 21, the mass hive mind sees
these measures as “progress” while knowing little to nothing about the extensive anti-human nevermind
anti-freedom measures being foisted upon them.

And it’s not just genetic culling, it’s mass population reduction.

An elitist think tank called The Club of Rome set the latest stage for this last push to demonize humanity
with the contrived invention of militant, invasive environmentalism. This appeared around the same time
as the widely sensationalized “population bomb” concept. While real ecology and conservationism make
common sense, this environmental agenda was created with the specific intention to foist massive controls
over human activities. That we’re now at the incredulous point of having to pay a literal carbon tax is a total
giveaway of their fraudulent intentions.

Yet few catch on.

And again, like the lie of human caused global warming, we should feel guilty for being alive, to such an
extent that even our breath is supposedly killing the planet.

Insane. Yet they keep pushing their agenda regardless of real scientific data to the contrary.

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/Bill-Gates-Vaccines2-e1411238437693.jpg

Bill Gates Vaccines

The Cauterized Mind of Dystopians

While humanity doesn’t share the bestial mindset of the elites and their occult driven agenda, these pounding
programs wear on people. Over time the continued onslaught of these nonsensical anti-truths start to wear a
groove in the mass mind.

The psycho-trauma tool of choice? Cognitive dissonance.

Resistance subsides as seemingly contrary understandings–in this case, “I’m a sovereign human being who
deserves life and freedom” vs. “I’m a parasitic organism killing my host planet and need to be eradicated”.
Screwy, but that’s what it boils down to.

And what gets synthesized in the mind to reconcile the two? “I guess they know what they’re doing. Gee, we
are bad and something needs to be done.” It doesn’t really make sense so the overload causes a shutdown
and back to the TV and ball game they go, acquiescing by apathy.

Once again, the intended solution being foisted on society gains traction.

And daring to oppose this new status-quo? It has now been cleverly engineered to be tantamount to terrorism,
the ultimate behavioral catch-all.

Game. Set. Match…or so they think.

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/stealing-of-palestinian-land-by-israel-with-the-help-of-the-west.jpg

stealing-of-palestinian-land-by-israel-with-the-help-of-the-west

Zio-Kabbalism – An Identifiable Virus Form

While the arrogant, intellectual roots of modern eugenics seem to escape mainstream consciousness, obvious
forms of racism and genocidal extermination, as recently exposed in the latest Gaza genocide, have been much
more evident. That the two are intrinsically connected takes one to the much deeper understanding of what’s
really going on on this planet – the elimination of more conscious and rooted indigenous forms of humanity and
the subjugation of the remaining human race and its ultimate manipulation into a non-questioning subservient
form actually loving its enslavement.

Yes, just like the predictive programming evidenced in literature and film making for centuries.

The Zionist mindset with its Kabbalistic occult sense of supremacism is a clear example of justified extermination
of “lesser” beings. An incredible “in your face” example that the world turns a blind eye to. Instead, they fall for
the big lie created by the engineered German holocaust that the perpetrators of this current extermination of their
“inferiors” as manifested in the millions of killed and displaced Palestinians, is somehow because the killers are
the potential victims.

That’s how they work. Manipulate history and pound the manipulated message home via propaganda. That simple
– as long as you have a complicit media and engorging codependent governments. Behold the birth of the Zionist
parasite called Israel. A perfect example of the sick fruits of eugenically driven, ravenous psychotic behavior,

When people wake up to that mechanism blood will run hot and heavy and they’ll get their due. They always
have and always will.

Evil dies from its own corrupted aberration. As in the human body, the protective immune system of the Universe
will eventually disable and recycle these invaders.

01gleaqaci

The Interdimensional Connection

In a Universe of boundless life and energy we know entities of all types exist, which even so-called modern scientists
affirm. Dimensions abound beyond ours and they’re here and interacting with our world.

This reality must play heavily into our personal understanding of our interdimensional cosmos. We’re a world under
siege, and we need to know our enemies as well as our friends. That such forces of darkness can mount such a
profoundly coordinated attack on a planet of mainly meek, loving inhabitants reeks of opportunity for an aggressive
force. I don’t know exactly what’s going on but I hope this helps present the case for what we’re potentially up against.

Inter-dimensional war.

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/01gleaqaci.jpeg

I would be remiss without pointing out these otherworldly influences on our three dimensional experience. There is
much more than meets the physical eye as we well know. People are driven by many influences, and spiritual ones
are the most profound. Religions dutifully categorize such concepts as good and bad influences, while metaphysics
dissects these various aspects with intrigue. Psychic, transcendental and after death phenomena also abound.

So please don’t tell me there’s nothing more than this observable world.

loveunitydance01

The Antidote – Disengage and Live in Truth and Love

http://www.zengardner.com/wp-content/uploads/loveunitydance01.jpg

Never give in mentally or spiritually to this onslaught. While we need to stay active in exposing their perfidy, we
cannot be part of their ensnaring mindset.

That’s why turning off all forms of mainstream media is so important. That’s why immersion in positive influences,
nature, and loving people to counter these types of realities is so important.

Anyone in their right mind knows this kind of plan cannot succeed in the long run. We happen to be at a time in
history where these negative, barbaric influences are peaking with the acceleration of hijacked technologies.

This too shall pass. But we should be vigilant and prepare as best we can, without fear. It’s a time to grow in
consciousness and communication with each other so we can share our combined knowledge, insights and loving support.

Therein is life, one day at a time. As it always is.

Much love, Zen

Read more: Eugenics, Depopulation and the Elite Mindset

http://www.zengardner.com/eugenics-psychopathic-depopulation-sanctified/

Hervé

6th October 2014, 14:31

India Holds Bill Gates Accountable For His Vaccine Crimes (http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/)

Christina England (http://vactruth.com/author/christina-england/)
October 5 2014

http://vactruth.com/wp-content/uploads/2014/10/India-HPV-Vaccine-630x315.jpg

As Bill Gates faces a lawsuit for the illegal testing of tribal children in India, it appears that his crimes against humanity have finally caught up with him.

A recent report published by Health Impact News has reported that the Gates Foundation has found itself facing a pending lawsuit, due to an investigation that is being carried out by the Supreme Courts of India.

Health Impact News stated:

“While fraud and corruption are revealed on almost a daily basis now in the vaccine industry, the U.S. mainstream media continues to largely ignore such stories. Outside the U.S., however, the vaccine empires are beginning to crumble, and English versions of the news in mainstream media outlets are available via the Internet.

One such country is India, where the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation and their vaccine empire are under fire, including a pending lawsuit currently being investigated by the India Supreme Court.” [1] The Health Impact News article centered largely on a four-page report that was recently published by Economic Times India.

Eager to know more, I investigated their story and discovered that the World Health Organization, the Gates Foundation and two organizations funded by them, PATH (Program for Appropriate Technology in Health) and GAVI (Global Alliance for Vaccines and Immunization), have found themselves under fire, after a writ of petition originally submitted to the Supreme Court of India, by Kalpana Mehta, Nalini Bhanot and Dr. Rukmini Rao in 2012, was finally heard by the courts.

The petitioners submitting the petition stated:

“BMGF, PATH and WHO were criminally negligent trialling the vaccines on a vulnerable, uneducated and under-informed population school administrators, students and their parents who were not provided informed consent or advised of potential adverse effects or required to be monitored post-vaccination.” [2] Young Tribal Girls Tested With HPV Vaccines
The Economic Times India published their report August 2014. They stated that in 2009, tests had been carried out on 16,000 tribal school children in Andhra Pradesh, India, using the human papiloma virus (HPV) vaccine, Gardasil.

According to the report written by KP Narayana Kumar, within a month of receiving the vaccine, many of the children fell ill and by 2010, five of them had died. A further two children were reported to have died in Vadodara, Gujarat, where an estimated 14,000 tribal children were vaccinated with another brand of the HPV vaccine, Cervarix, manufactured by GlaxoSmitheKline (GSK).

Shockingly, the report stated that many of the consent forms used to vaccinate the girls were signed “illegally,” either by the wardens from the hostels where many of the girls resided, or using thumbprints from illiterate parents.

This travesty was not discovered until a team of health activists from the non-government organization SAMA, an organization specializing in women’s health, decided to investigate what had been going on.

According to the report, they were shocked to discover that a total of 120 girls had been taken ill, suffering from a variety of symptoms, including “epileptic seizures, severe stomach aches, headaches and mood swings.”

The Economic Times stated:

“The Sama report also said there had been cases of early onset of menstruation following the vaccination, heavy bleeding and severe menstrual cramps among many students. The standing committee pulled up the relevant state governments for the shoddy investigation into these deaths.

It said it was disturbed to find that ‘all the seven deaths were summarily dismissed as unrelated to vaccinations without in-depth investigations …’ the speculative causes were suicides, accidental drowning in well (why not suicide?), malaria, viral infections, subarachnoid hemorrhage (without autopsy) etc.” This information is even more shocking when you discover that the organization funding the study was none other than the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, who declared the project a total success.

Kumar wrote:

“According to the BMGF, the WHO, the International Federation of Gynaecology and Obstetrics, and the Federation of Obstetric and Gynaecological Societies of India have all recommended vaccination ‘as a proven and highly effective preventive measure for cervical cancer.’ The project used vaccines that are licensed in India and that have been administered safely around the world tens of millions of times, preventing countless cases of cervical cancer illness and death, ‘maintains a BMGF spokesperson in an emailed response (see GAVI & PHFI create incentives …’” He continued:

“BMGF’s role in funding the controversial studies, however, has led to many healthcare activists in India voicing their apprehensions. ‘BMGF has to take full responsibility because PATH is funded by them. It is also unethical when people championing the cause of vaccines are the same ones who are also investing in vaccine development,’ said V Rukmini Rao, one of the activists who filed a writ petition before the Supreme Court in connection with the HPV vaccine studies.” [3] Absolutely, and this is not the first time that these organizations have been caught illegally testing vaccines in developing countries.

Gates Foundation, WHO, PATH, GAVI, UNICEF Behind Chad Vaccine Disaster
In December 2012, in the small village of Gouro, Chad, Africa, situated on the edge of the Sahara Desert, five hundred children were locked into their school, threatened that if they did not agree to being force-vaccinated with a meningitis A vaccine, they would receive no further education.

These children were vaccinated without their parents’ knowledge. This vaccine was an unlicensed product still going through the third and fourth phases of testing.

Within hours, one hundred and six children began to suffer from headaches, vomiting, severe uncontrollable convulsions and paralysis. The children’s wait for a doctor began. They had to wait one full week for a doctor to arrive while the team of vaccinators proceeded to vaccinate others in the village.

When the doctor finally came, he could do nothing for the children. The team of vaccinators, upon seeing what had happened, fled the village in fear.

The original report written in a small, local newspaper called La Voix, the only newspaper to have published the original story, stated that forty children were finally transferred to a hospital in Faya and later taken by plane to two hospitals in N’Djamena, the capital city of Chad.

ZEBGG7KFQpULink to VacTruth Article (http://vactruth.com/2013/01/06/paralyzed-after-meningitis-vaccine/)

After being shuttled around like cattle, many of these sick, weak children were finally dumped back in their village without a diagnosis and each family was given an unconfirmed sum of £1000 by the government. No forms were signed and no documentation was seen. They were informed that their children had not suffered a vaccine injury.

However, if this were true, why would their government award each family £1000 in what has been described as hush money?

The only mainstream news channel to have highlighted the plight of these poor children was a local channel called Tchad, which filmed footage of the then-Prime Minister of Chad visiting the children in hospital.

VacTruth has copies of both reports, along with medical and government documents.

Despite this evidence and VacTruth’s detailed and extensive coverage, including highlighting television footage, once again, the vaccine program was hailed a success. To watch videos reporting the story, see the references at the end of this article. [4] [5]

The groups involved with this project were PATH, WHO, UNICEF, and the Gates Foundation. During investigations, it was discovered that the whole project was being run by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

In a press release, the Gates Foundation stated:

“MenAfriVac is a tremendous success story for the global health community. It is the first vaccine developed specifically for Africa, and it proves that global partnerships can develop and deliver high-quality, low-cost vaccines.

Ten years ago, we invested in the Meningitis Vaccine Project, an innovative model that brought together PATH, the World Health Organization, African health ministers and the Serum Institute of India today, we celebrate the result: a modern vaccine selling for less than US 50 cents per dose with the potential to end Africa’s deadly meningitis epidemics.

We believe that vaccines are one of the best buys in global health. In January, Bill and Melinda Gates called on the global community to make this the Decade of Vaccines. There is no better way to launch this decade than with a new vaccine that will improve and save lives.” [6] VacTruth can prove otherwise.

Government Inquiry Holds GAVI Accountable for Multiple Deaths
Despite the fact the Gates Foundation call vaccines “one of the best buys in global health,” a government inquiry in Pakistan has found the complete opposite.

In 2011, the Express Tribune published a story stating that:

“ISLAMABAD: A government inquiry has found that polio vaccines for infants funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunisation are causing deaths and disabilities in regional countries including Pakistan.

The startling revelation is part of an inquiry report prepared by the Prime Minister’s Inspection Commission (PMIC) on the working of the Expanded Programme on Immunisation (EPI). The PMIC, headed by Malik Amjad Noon, has recommended that Prime Minister Yousaf Raza Gilani immediately suspend the administration of all types of vaccines funded by the GAVI.” According to the Express Tribune, the main vaccinations in question were the polio vaccine and the 5-in-1 pentavelent vaccine, which were said to be responsible for the deaths and disability of a number of children in Pakistan, India, Sri Lanka, Bhutan and Japan.

The vaccines were funded by the Global Alliance for Vaccination and Immunization (GAVI) an organization financed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Children’s Vaccine Program, the International Federation of Pharmaceutical Manufacturers Association, the Rockefeller Foundation, the United Nations Children’s Fund (UNICEF), the World Health Organization (WHO) and the World Bank.

Writing on the official report, made exclusive to the newspaper, the Express Tribune stated:

“The report states, ‘The procured vaccines are not tested in laboratories to confirm their efficacy and genuineness. This leaves room for use of spurious and counterfeit vaccines.’” [7] (emphasis added) If this is true, then once again the Gates Foundation has been linked to mass vaccination initiatives using untested, unsafe vaccinations.

The Gates Foundation and WHO Labeled Unethical by Medical Experts
In 2012, Ramesh Shankar Mumbai, an author writing for the Pharmabiz website, reported that two medical experts from India had accused the Gates Foundation and WHO of being unethical.

In his report, Mumbai stated that Dr. Neetu Vashisht and Dr. Jacob Puliyel of the Department of Pediatrics at St. Stephens Hospital in Delhi, wrote the following information in their report in the April issue of Indian Journal of Medical Ethics.

“It was unethical for WHO and Bill Gates to flog this program when they knew 10 years back that it was never to succeed. Getting poor countries to expend their scarce resources on an impossible dream over the last 10 years was unethical.” Pharmabiz.com reported that Dr. Vashisht and Dr. Puliyel had continued their report by stating:

“Another major ethical issue raised by the campaign is the failure to thoroughly investigate the increase in the incidence of non-polio acute flaccid paralysis (NPAFP) in areas where many doses of vaccine were used. NPAFP is clinically indistinguishable from polio paralysis but twice as deadly.” Pharmabiz.com continued:

“The authors noted that while India was polio-free in 2011, in the same year, there were 47500 cases of NPAFP. While data from India’s National Polio Surveillance Project showed NPAFP rate increased in proportion to the number of polio vaccine doses received, independent studies showed that children identified with NPAFP ‘were at more than twice the risk of dying than those with wild polio infection.’” [8] The corruption and deceit by these organizations does not stop there.

The Gates Foundation Blamed for 10,000 Vaccine-Related Deaths
In 2013, yet another report named the Gates Foundation and GAVI as being responsible for multiple deaths using untested vaccinations on children from the developing world.

The report, published on the website Occupy Corporatism and written by Susanne Posel stated:

“It was found out through an investigation, that GAVI was using an untested vaccine; giving this dangerous vaccine to Pakistani children shows the lack of empathy associated with these organizations.

GAVI was blamed for the deaths of 10,000 children in Pakistan when they came in and administered polio vaccines that resulted in casualties.” [9]
As we know, GAVI is heavily funded by the Gates Foundation. [10]

So, what was the name of the organization that investigated GAVI and found them using untested polio vaccinations in Pakistan?

According to the Express Tribune article, which I referred to earlier in this article, it was none other than the Indian government, who, upon discovering the shocking truth, recommended the immediate suspension of the administration of all types of vaccines funded by GAVI. [7]

In a recent radio show hosted by Sallie O. Elkordy, Susanne Posel gave her frank and honest views on the whole sorry mess that we find ourselves in today.

Warning: This report is not for the faint-hearted. [11]

Conclusion
It is difficult to believe that, despite the mounting evidence outlining the many crimes against humanity that have been committed by the Gates Foundation, GAVI, UNICEF and PATH, Bill Gates is portrayed as a hero among many.

However, according to the definition of hero in the Oxford Dictionary, the word hero means:

“A person, typically a man, who is admired or idealized for courage, outstanding achievements, or noble qualities.” [12]
The dictionary I used said nothing about vaccinating innocent, vulnerable children with untested and unsafe vaccinations, causing them to suffer agonizing, untimely deaths.

References

http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-vaccine-empire-on-trial-in-india/
http://holyhormones.com/womens-health/cancer-womens-health… (http://vactruth.com/2014/10/05/bill-gates-vaccine-crimes/%20http://holyhormones.com/womens-health/cancer-womens-health/cervical-cancer/india-women-activists/)
http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-31… (http://articles.economictimes.indiatimes.com/2014-08-31/news/53413161_1_hpv-vaccine-cervarix-human-papilloma-virus)
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ZEBGG7KFQpU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=dsxSlT_sBRk
http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases… (http://www.gatesfoundation.org/Media-Center/Press-Releases/2010/12/Statement-on-the-Launch-of-New-Meningitis-Group-A-Vaccine)
http://tribune.com.pk/story/293191/vaccine-nation-globally-supported-company-is-funding-fatal-polio-shots/
http://pharmabiz.com/NewsDetails.aspx?aid=68352&sid=1
http://www.occupycorporatism.com/the-shocking-truth-about-syrian-polio-resurgence… (http://www.occupycorporatism.com/the-shocking-truth-about-syrian-polio-resurgence-regime-change/)
http://www.gavi.org/about/partners/bmgf/
http://www.blogtalkradio.com/publicadvocate… (http://www.blogtalkradio.com/publicadvocate/2013/11/25/10000-children-dead-from-vaccine-journalist-susanne-posel)
http://www.oxforddictionaries.com/us/definition/american_english/hero

Pam

6th October 2014, 14:45

Hervé

8th November 2014, 18:34

‘A mass sterilization exercise’: Kenyan doctors find anti-fertility agent in UN tetanus vaccine (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u)
Thu Nov 6, 2014 - 2:29 pm EST

Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”

Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”

But the government says the vaccine is safe. Health Minister James Macharia even told the BBC, “I would recommend my own daughter and wife to take it because I entirely 100% agree with it and have confidence it has no adverse health effects.”

And Dr. Collins Tabu, head of the Health Ministry’s immunization branch, told the Kenyan Nation, that “there is no other additive in the vaccine other than the tetanus antigen.”

Tabu said the same vaccine has been used for 30 years in Kenya. Moreover, “there are women who were vaccinated in October 2013 and March this year who are expectant. Therefore we deny that the vaccines are laced with contraceptives.”

Newspaper stories also report women getting pregnant after being vaccinated.

Responds Dr. Ngare: “Either we are lying or the government is lying. But ask yourself, ‘What reason do the Catholic doctors have for lying?’” Dr. Ngare added: “The Catholic Church has been here in Kenya providing health care and vaccinating for 100 years for longer than Kenya has existed as a country.”

Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of child-bearing years, and why is it not being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?

“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare. “If this is intended to inoculate children in the womb, why give it to girls starting at 15 years? You cannot get married till you are 18.” The usual way to vaccinate children is to wait till they are six weeks old.”

But it is the five-vaccination regime that is most alarming. “The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.”

It is HCG that has been found in all six samples sent to the University of Nairobi medical laboratory and another in South Africa. The bishops and doctors warn that injecting women with HCG , which mimics a natural hormone produced by pregnant women, causes them to develop antibodies against it. When they do get pregnant, and produce their own version of HCG, it triggers the production of antibodies that cause a miscarriage.

“We knew that the last time this vaccination with five injections has been used was in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and the Philippines in 1994,” said Dr. Ngare. “It didn’t cause miscarriages till three years later,” which is why, he added, the counterclaims that women who got the vaccination recently and then got pregnant are meaningless.

Ngare said WHO tried to bring the same anti-fertility program into Kenya in the 1990s. “We alerted the government and it stopped the vaccination. But this time they haven’t done so.”

Ngare also contrasted the secrecy of this campaign with the usual fanfare accompanying national vaccination efforts. “They usually bring all the stakeholders together three months before the campaign, like they did with polio a little while ago. And they use staff in all the centres to give out the vaccine.” But with this anti-tetanus campaign, “only a few operatives from the government are allowed to give it out. They come with a police escort. They take it away with them when they are finished. Why not leave it with the local medical staff to administer?”

Brian Clowes of Human Life International in Virginia told LifeSite News that WHO was not involved in the Nicaragua, Mexican and Philippines campaigns. “They try to maintain a spotless record. They let organizations like United Nations Population Fund and USAID do the dirty work.”

In the previous cases, said Clowes, the vaccinators insisted their product was pure until it was shown not to be. Then they claimed the positive tests for HCG were isolated, accidental contaminations in the manufacturing process.

LifeSiteNews has obtained a UN report on an August 1992 meeting at its world headquarters in Geneva of 10 scientists from “Australia, Europe, India and the U.S.A” and 10 “women’s health advocates” from around the world, to discuss the use of “fertility regulating vaccines.” It describes the “anti-Human Chorionic Gonadotropin vaccine” as the most advanced.

One million Kenyan women and girls have been vaccinated so far with another 1.3 million to go. The vaccination is targeting women, according to the government, in order to inoculate their children in the womb against tetanus as well. The government says 550 children die of tetanus yearly.

In covering the contest of words the pro-government Nation found plenty of women who had been vaccinated and were now pregnant, even one who was the wife of a former Catholic priest who left the Church to marry. The paper ignored Kenya’s reliance on the Catholic medical system, while setting the bishops’ stand in a questionable historical context of irrational responses “largely based on religious beliefs,” the more recent murder of vaccination teams in Nigeria, and even of CIA conspiracy theories.

Why would the UN want to suppress the population in developing countries? “Racism,” is Brian Clowes’ first explanation. “Also, the developed countries want to get hold of their natural resources. And lately, there is the whole bogus global warming thing.”

Dr. Ngare said it was the Catholic Church’s hope that the government could have resolved the matter quietly by testing the vaccine. “But the government has chosen to be combative,” forcing Kenya’s bishops and Catholic doctors to go public.

WHO’s Kenyan office and several WHO media contacts in Washington, D.C. failed to respond to LifeSiteNews enquiries over a 24-hour period.

Hervé

11th November 2014, 13:29

Depopulation vaccine in Kenya and beyond (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/depopulation-vaccine-in-kenya-and-beyond/)

Nov 10 (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/11/10/depopulation-vaccine-in-kenya-and-beyond/), 2014 by Jon Rappoport (http://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/)
NoMoreFakeNews.com (http://nomorefakenews.com/)

We have this current claim:

“Kenya’s Catholic bishops are charging two United Nations organizations with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus inoculation program sponsored by the Kenyan government.

“According to a statement released Tuesday by the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, the organization has found an antigen that causes miscarriages in a vaccine being administered to 2.3 million girls and women by the World Health Organization and UNICEF. Priests throughout Kenya reportedly are advising their congregations to refuse the vaccine.

“We sent six samples from around Kenya to laboratories in South Africa. They tested positive for the HCG antigen,” Dr. Muhame Ngare of the Mercy Medical Centre in Nairobi told LifeSiteNews. “They were all laced with HCG.”
“Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4, “This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.”
(“Mass Sterilization: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-Fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine,” (http://www.earth-heal.com/news/news/29-depopulation/1899-mass-sterilization-un-tetanus-vaccine.html) November 8, 2014, by Steve Weatherbe, earth-heal.com (http://www.earth-heal.com/)) You have to understand that every promoted so-called “pandemic” is an extended sales pitch for vaccines (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/27/ebola-one-covert-op-feeds-into-another/).

And not just a vaccine against the “killer germ” of the moment. We’re talking about a psyop to condition the population to vaccines in general.

There is much available literature on vaccines used for depopulation experiments. The research is ongoing. Undoubtedly, we only know a fraction of what is happening behind closed laboratory doors.

Depopulation has several objectives. Along one vector, it is an elite strategy designed to get rid of large numbers of people, in key areas of the world, where local revolutions would interfere with outside corporations staging a complete takeover of fertile land and rich natural resources.

An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385. (http://www.fasebj.org/content/7/14/1381.full.pdf) Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

A quote from the paper:

“Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).”A birth control vaccine?

Yes.

A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting.

Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the FASEB paper (p.1382) called “Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG.” The authors are trying to discover whether a state of non-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG.

Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49, 1993. “Contraceptive Vaccines.” (http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/1/88.abstract) The authors—RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

“Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials, involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered … incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides … Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies…”
The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. Training a woman’s body to react against one of its own secreted hormones. The authors state, “The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

Stop the female body from recognizing a state of pregnancy. Get the body to treat the natural hormone hCG as an intruder, a disease agent, and mobilize the forces of the immune system against it. Create a synthetic effect, an engineered effect, by which the mother’s “maternal endocrine system” does not swing into gear when pregnancy occurs. The result? The embryo in the mother is swept away by her next period—since hGC, which signals the existence of the pregnancy and halts menstruation cycles, is now treated as a disease entity.

The authors put it this way: “In principle, the induction of immunity against hGC should lead to a sequence of normal, or slightly extended, menstrual cycles during which any pregnancies would be terminated…”

Miscarriage would then be the “normal” state of affairs. These authors leave no doubt about who the target of this vaccine would be:

“During the next decade the world’s population is set to rise by around 500 million. Moreover, because the rates of population growth in the developing countries of Africa, South America, and Asia will be so much greater than the rest of the world, the distribution of this dramatic population growth will be uneven…” Two other vaccine methods are described. They “aim to prevent conception by interfering with the intricate cascade of interactive events that characterize the union of male and female gametes at fertilization.”

The diptheria and tetanus vaccines would function as a social and political mask—to hide the sterilizing intent, as millions of women in the Third World would receive vaccines they’re told would protect them against infections and disease.

A letter to a medical journal, The Lancet, p.1222, Volume 339, May 16, 1992. “Cameroon: Vaccination and politics.” (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PII0140-6736%2892%2991151-W/fulltext) Peter Ndumbe and Emmanuel Yenshu, the authors of this letter, report on their efforts to analyze widespread popular resistance to a tetanus vaccine given in the northwest province of Cameroon.

Two of the reasons women rejected the vaccine: it was given only to “females of childbearing age,” and people heard that a “sterilizing agent” was present in the vaccine.

The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, in his piece “Real U.S. Policy in Third World: Sterilization : Disregard the ‘empowerment’ shoe polish–the goal is to keep the natives from breeding,” (http://articles.latimes.com/1994-09-08/local/me-35791_1_shoe-polish) reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”

“… the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.’” In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people.

Does this remind you of what is happening in West Africa now, re “the Ebola crisis?” Lockdown. Borders sealed. Over the past five years, several vaccine campaigns—and who knows what other vectors for the transmission of toxic elements to the population.

Cockburn notes that the writers of the Kissinger memo “favored sterilization over food aid.” He goes on to say that “By 1977, Reimart Ravenholt, the director of AID’s [US Agency for International Development] population program, was saying that his agency’s goal was to sterilize one-quarter of the world’s women.”

There were unconfirmed reports from the Philippines and Mexico that their 1993 tetanus vaccination programs—which were supposedly administered only to women of childbearing age—involved multiple injections.

Tetanus vaccine protocols indicate that one injection is good for ten years. Therefore, multiple injections would indicate another motive for the vaccinations—such as the anti-fertility effect of hCG planted in the vaccine.

My inquiries to Philippine officials went unanswered.

The Population Research Institute, in the November/December 1996 issue of its Review, published a report by David Morrison.

Morrison stated,

“Philippine women may have been unwittingly vaccinated against their own children, a recent study conducted by the Philippine Medical Association (PMA) has indicated.

“The study tested random samples of a tetanus vaccine for the presence of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG), a hormone essential to the establishment and maintenance of pregnancy … The PMA’s positive test results indicate that just such an abortifacient may have been administered to Philippine women without their consent.

“The PMA notified the Philippine Department of Health (PDOH) of these findings in a 16 September letter signed by the researchers and certified by its President. Using an immunological assay developed by the Food and Drug Administration in the United States, a three-doctor research panel tested forty-seven vials of tetanus vaccine collected at random from various health centers in Luzon and Mindanao. Nine were found to contain hCG in levels ranging from 0.191680 mIU/ml to 3.046061 mIU/ml. These vaccines, most of which were labeled as of Canadian origin, were supplied by the World Health Organization as part of a WHO-sponsored [sterilization] vaccination program.” Morrison’s article would seem to indicate that the vials of vaccine tested came from a widespread immunization campaign rather than from a small pilot study of a few women.

The Task Force on Vaccines for Fertility Regulation was created at the World Health Organization in 1973. Ute Sprenger, writing in Biotechnology and Development Monitor (December 1995) describes the Task Force:

“…a global coordinating body for anti-fertility vaccine R&D…such as anti-sperm and anti-ovum vaccines and vaccines designed to neutralize the biological functions of hCG.” Sprenger indicates that, as of 1995, there were several large groups researching these vaccines. Among them:

* WHO/HRP. HRP is the Special Progamme of Research, Development and Research Training in Human Reproduction, located in Switzerland. It is funded by “the governments of Sweden, United Kingdom, Norway, Denmark, Germany and Canada, as well as the UNFPA and the World Bank.”

* The Population Council. It’s a US group funded by the Rockefeller Foundation, the National Institutes of Health [a US federal agency], and the US Agency for International Development [notorious for its collaborations with the CIA].

* National Institute of Immunology. Located in India, “major funders are the Indian government, the Canadian International Development Research Center and the Rockefeller Foundation.”

* [U]The Center for Population Research, located at the US National Institute of Child Health and Development [!], which is part of the US National Institutes of Health.

The Lancet, 4 June, 1998, p.1272:
“During the recent National Immunisation Campaign (vaccination for childhood diseases and tetanus toxoid for pregnant women), in some villages [of Thailand] the women escaped and hid in the bushes thinking that they were going to be given injections to stop them having children.”

AP, Boston Globe, October 10, 1992, “Birth-control vaccine is reported in India”: “Scientists said yesterday they have created the first birth-control shot for women, effective for an entire year…[after which] a booster shot is needed.” There are other citations from published medical literature—but you get the idea: vaccines as depopulation instruments.

And the hCG versions I refer to appear to be crude efforts. Who knows what levels of sophistication have been achieved in secret?

West Nile, SARS, bird flu, Swine Flu, Ebola—the real motive for promoting these “pandemics” is the follow-up: vaccines.

To a highly significant degree, the CDC and the World Health Organization are PR agencies, whose job is to convince the public that stepping up, rolling up their sleeves, and submitting to shots containing germs and toxic chemicals is the most natural and wise action possible.

Yes, and ignorance is strength.

The Matrix is designed inside out and upside down.

Jon Rappoport

avid

11th November 2014, 19:03

The moral of this is.... give vaccines a miss! Posted previously elsewhere, but need to replicate the warning:
http://henrymakow.com/2014/11/Ebola-an-Excuse-for-Mass-Vaccination.html
Terrible side-effects since the 1860's of 'vaccines', actually promoting the disease!
For our children's sake - stop vaccinating, and eat healthily. Stuff the Big Pharma hype - they will scare us and try to poison us, but stay focussed on healthy eating, clean habits.
By all means - go to the doctor/emergency unit if there is a crisis.
Try to keep a balanced viewpoint - Avid

Hervé

1st December 2014, 16:59

Must read! One parent who had enough - Vaccines: Medical ignorance and deceit (http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2014/11/29/vaccines-medical-ignorance-or-deceit-one-parent-who-had-enough/)

Trina Ricketts The Liberty Beacon (http://www.thelibertybeacon.com/2014/11/29/vaccines-medical-ignorance-or-deceit-one-parent-who-had-enough/)
Mon, 01 Dec 2014 13:23 CET

http://www.sott.net/image/s10/217893/large/vaccine_gardasil.jpg (http://www.sott.net/image/s10/217893/full/vaccine_gardasil.jpg)

In British Columbia (Canada), school nurses deliberately track down youth aged 14 and up who have consent forms from the their parents marked "NO" to all vaccines and attempt to persuade those children to get vaccinated under "mature consent" laws that state children over the age of 14 may make their own decisions about medical interventions. A number of my friends' children were coerce into vaccines against their parents' wishes and one parent in particular has taken his case to the BC Civil Liberties Association.

When vaccination day approached for my 14-year-old daughter, I wanted to keep her home from school. Knowing that many parents relent to vaccinating their children despite their original intention to refuse because they are bullied into it by nurses or doctors, I can easily imagine how hard it must be for children to refuse in the face of such pressure.

I planned to keep my daughter home from school on vaccination day, but the shots took place during her favorite classes and she didn't want to miss them. I coached my daughter on what to say and do if anyone tried to force her to take the shots. I also sent a letter requesting non-vaccination.In my letter, I informed the vaccine-pushers that I would take it to the courts and the media if my daughter was coerced into getting vaccinated.

To my surprise, the Medical Health Officer for my local health authority responded to my letter. It was the usual propaganda with a dash of condescension and a wallop of complete ignorance. I could not help it. I decided to respond...

November 19, 2014

Medical Health Officer,

I had not expected a reply to my letter, but since you took the time to do so, I thought it would only be polite to respond to you as well. You encouraged me to contact you if I had any questions or concerns.

I have a number of concerns about vaccines in general and I am especially concerned about nurses identifying unvaccinated children and targeting their efforts towards these children against their parents' wishes. I will enumerate my questions and ask that you please provide answers, including evidence (or sources listed) proving any claims you make in your responses to me.

My first group of questions involve "informed consent." May I ask:

*What is the procedure for "informing" the child of the benefits and risks associated with the vaccines you are administering?

*Do you provide the vaccine insert and go over the ingredients in each vaccine, their known toxicity, and why those ingredients are necessary?

*Do you inform the child of the risk of getting the disease in question?

*Do you tell the child what the risk of death is if she or he acquires the disease?

*Do you explain the symptoms of the disease, so that the child can decide whether to take chances with the vaccine or the disease?

*Do you list the potential adverse reactions which are included in the vaccine insert that comes with the vaccine?

*Do you ask if the child has any family members who have had adverse reactions to vaccines?

*Do you provide children who arrive with consent forms from their parents saying "yes" to the recommended vaccines with informed consent? Do you tell them that they have a right to refuse the vaccine despite their parents' wishes? Do you explain all the risks/benefits and information I detailed above to these children?

If you do not do all of these things prior to giving vaccinations to people, especially children, then you do not obtain "informed consent."

My next group of questions involve evidence. You say in your letter that "immunization is an important and effective public health measure in protecting individuals and the community against vaccine preventable diseases."

*Please provide evidence showing this statement to be true by sending me copies of the studies or name sources for studies that I can view independently that prove vaccines are safe and effective. These studies should show causation, not correlation.For instance, if a disease disappeared around the same time that a vaccine was introduced, please include dates, a graph showing the correlation of decline and why it is considered causative proof.

*Please name the source studies that resulted in Fraser Health changing the number of HPV shots given to girls. I received a letter saying that "recent studies" have indicated that girls do not need more than two HPV shots anymore. I would like to know what in those studies prompted this decision.

*Please provide proof that the HPV vaccine prevents cancer.

*Please advise me of any studies showing the health differences between vaccinated and unvaccinated children.

*Please advise me how much training nurses receive about vaccines prior to administering them or going through the "mature consent" steps you outlined in your letter.

*You mention in your letter that nurses "obtain screens for specific contraindications to the vaccine." How is this accomplished? What does this mean?

*Regarding evidence:Please be advised that I do not accept studies wherein the control group are given aluminum or other vaccines as a "placebo." Using toxic substances as a "placebo" in a control group is not ethical science. Comparing people injected with vaccines with people injected with the ingredients of vaccines is junk science.

Regarding the following steps you outline in your letter for obtaining "mature consent" as listed here:

*Informing a child that he or she can get immunized against the parents' wishes;

*Assessing the capability of the person to provide consent;

*Providing "standard information;"

*Giving time for questions and answers;

*And assuring the child he or she can refuse or revoke consent.

I have the following questions:

*What specifically do you consider to be "standard information;" in other words, what information do you provide?

*How does a nurse "assess the capability of the person providing consent?" Is she trained in psychological assessment? If the "assessment" takes place in a matter of minutes, how can it be considered reliable?

In conclusion, I would like to share a little story about "informed consent."

Recently, I was advised by a doctor to get a tetanus vaccine. He told me that there was a very strong risk of me dying if I did not receive the vaccine prior to my procedure. He also told me that tetanus is a bacteria that originates inside the stomach which can cause death if a person is not vaccinated against it. Here is what I know about the tetanus vaccine that this doctor did not know:

*The bacteria that cause tetanus, Clostridium tetani, are found in soil, dust and animal feces. Not our stomachs.

*In 2009 there were 19 tetanus cases reported (mostly in adults over 65) with two related deaths.

*As of August 2012, there had been 22,143 adverse events in children and adults reported to the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) following tetanus or tetanus containing vaccines combined with diphtheria vaccine (TT, TD, DT) and 67 deaths.

*In 1994 the Institute of Medicine concluded that there is compelling scientific evidence to conclude that tetanus, DT and Td vaccines can cause Guillain-Barre syndrome including death; brachial neuritis; and death from anaphylaxis (shock).

*I refused the vaccine despite the doctor's attempts to persuade me with false information. I had the procedure done. I did not get tetanus. I did not die.

I have spent many hours researching vaccines, reading the studies, and learning about the risks of vaccines vs. the diseases they are purported to prevent. In contrast, I find that most health professionals know very little about vaccines except to say that they are safe and effective because that is what their textbooks said.

I am aware of the danger for health professionals who refuse to comply with standard vaccine rhetoric. They risk losing their licenses, being fired, and otherwise being excluded or shamed (wearing masks) for choosing to exercise their health freedom rights. While I empathize with those in your profession, I cannot condone the practice of targeting children and persuading them to get vaccinated against their parents' wishes. These nurses have very little knowledge about the risks of vaccines, nor do they truly inform the child of the potential side effects or risks associated with vaccines. The HPV vaccine, in particular, has caused ovarian failure, infertility, disability and death in many children worldwide. Many countries are withdrawing the HPV vaccine from their vaccine programs. Do you tell each child this? Do you tell the parents this? If not, then you omit information that would ensure true "informed consent."

My hope is that I have raised questions in your mind about the safety and effectiveness of vaccines; that you will realize the hypocrisy of a medical establishment that vows to "First do no harm," yet denies any harm done when a person is vaccine-injured. We have low stats of vaccine injuries because doctors refuse to admit when they occur. Even with our low stats, the Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) shows a small snapshot of the astronomical number of people who are vaccine-injured daily. Vaccines can and do cause harm. Denying this truth is a disservice and it destroys lives.

People deserve to be truly informed when making decisions about their health. And their decisions should be respected.

I look forward to your response and the research proving your claims. Please respond by mail.

Sincerely,

Trina Ricketts

SOTT Comment: (http://www.sott.net/article/289658-Must-read-One-parent-who-had-enough-Vaccines-Medical-ignorance-and-deceit)

For more information, see Gardasil: Medical torture and child abuse by Big Pharma: (http://www.sott.net/article/277014-Gardasil-Medical-torture-and-child-abuse-by-Big-Pharma)

There is something deeply wrong with a giant pharmaceutical company spending hundreds of millions of dollars to manipulate women and influence legislation in order to generate a revenue stream of billions of dollars a year for itself at the expense of a gullible public. Because what is wrong with Gardasil isn't just that it is unnecessary. Gardasil is possibly the most dangerous vaccine on the market, with the potential to injure, maim, or even kill the children who receive it.
To all parents being asked to vaccinate their daughters - or even sons - with Gardasil, Tracy has this to say: "Please do your homework. Please educate yourself about the risks of this vaccine. The risk of cervical cancer is so low and the success of regular Pap testing has been so great that there really is no need for this vaccine at all. There is no going back once your child has brain damage.

Hervé

8th June 2015, 19:18

Tens of thousands of teen girls suffer serious illnesses after HPV cervical cancer jab (http://www.express.co.uk/life-style/health/581393/Tens-of-thousands-teen-girls-suffer-serious-illnesses-HPV-cervical-cancer-health-concerns)

By Oli Smith (http://www.express.co.uk/search/Oli+Smith?s=Oli+Smith&b=1) PUBLISHED: 12:03, Mon, Jun 1, 2015 | UPDATED: 12:19, Mon, Jun 1, 2015

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/11/590x/HPV-581393.jpg
GETTY

TENS of thousands of teenage girls have fallen seriously ill and even been left wheelchair-bound after taking the routine cervical cancer vaccination.

The HPV jab has been routinely given to 12-year-old and 13-year-old girls since 2008The Medicines and Healthcare Products Regulatory Agency announced that 8,228 young girls had suffered debilitating side effects from the HPV injection.

However, the number is estimated to be only ten per cent of the true number of teens struck down with severe side effects after taking the vaccine.

The jab has been routinely administered to 12-year-old and 13-year-old girls in Britain since 2008. The injection blocks the sexually transmitted human papilloma virus which leads to most cervical cancer cases.

Otherwise healthy school-aged girls have reportedly suffered chest and abdominal pains, exhaustion, breathing difficulties, postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome, which triggers an abnormally high heart rate, and fibromyalgia, which causes chronic pain throughout the body.

In more than a quarter of the cases, the effects have apparently been so severe that they were considered 'life-threatening' and required immediate medical treatment.

The concern over the injection is not new.

The Japanese health ministry has previously warned against the vaccination while European countries are continuing to re-evaluate its use.

Previously, links with infertility and early menopause have also been explored.

More than eight million people in the UK have been given the vaccination despite the ongoing links with grave conditions.

Jackie Fletcher, of the pressure group Jabs, said: "Previously fit and healthy young girls have developed seizures or viral fatigue, some have lost the ability to walk. And years on, some have still not recovered."

http://cdn.images.express.co.uk/img/dynamic/11/590x/secondary/Cervical-297244.jpg
GETTY

Cervical cancer kills nearly a thousand women every yearIn a recent article in the Clinical Rheumatology journal Dr Martinez-Lavin wrote that although the HPV injection has been 'one of the most effective public health measures in the history of medicine', the level of side effects reported compared to other routine vaccinations is a growing concern.

In fact, the total number of illnesses associated with the HPV jab tops the number of side-effects reported in all other routine health programmes combined.

In light of their own report, the UK's MHRA has continued to claim that there were no 'major safety concerns' associated with the jab.

The watchdog insisted that the vaccine can save nearly half of the 1,000 women who die from the killer disease every year. It is the second most common cancer afflicting women under-35.

The agency maintains that the link with serious illnesses remains unproven while NHS asserts that the HPV vaccination programme has proven 'very effective'.

SOTT Comment: (http://www.sott.net/article/297551-Tens-of-thousands-of-teen-girls-suffer-serious-illnesses-after-HPV-cervical-cancer-jab) Considering all the information available and the extent of the scientific negligence, the HPV vaccine does seem to qualify as torture:

"Medical care that causes severe suffering for no justifiable reason can be considered cruel, inhuman or degrading treatment or punishment, and if there is State involvement and specific intent, it is torture." [ United Nation's 2013 Report by the Special Rapporteur on Torture and Other Cruel, Inhuman or Degrading Treatment or Punishment (http://www.ohchr.org/Documents/HRBodies/HRCouncil/RegularSession/Session22/A.HRC.22.53_English.pdf)] Doctors, lawyers and people in general should keep this in mind.

Not convinced? Check out:

Gardasil: Medical torture and child abuse by Big Pharma (http://www.sott.net/article/277014-Gardasil-Medical-torture-and-child-abuse-by-Big-Pharma)

Gardasil's DNA contaminant leading to genetic mutations confirmed by independent lab (http://www.sott.net/article/279032-Gardasils-DNA-contaminant-leading-to-genetic-mutations-confirmed-by-independent-lab)

TV2 Denmark documentary on HPV vaccine shows lives of young women ruined (http://www.sott.net/article/295871-TV2-Denmark-documentary-on-HPV-vaccine-shows-lives-of-young-women-ruined)

Hervé

26th June 2015, 20:10

Gardasil Firestorm in Denmark (http://www.naturalblaze.com/2015/06/gardasil-firestorm-in-denmark.html)

By Norma Erickson, Tuesday, June 23, 2015

http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KCzGS044fc0/VYl5qxbeZhI/AAAAAAAApB0/TvtvV7gdUWs/s320/Gardasil-Denmark.png (http://2.bp.blogspot.com/-KCzGS044fc0/VYl5qxbeZhI/AAAAAAAApB0/TvtvV7gdUWs/s1600/Gardasil-Denmark.png)

In March 2015, a Danish national television station (TV2) aired a documentary focusing on girls who suspected they had been injured by the HPV vaccine Gardasil (http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-a-danish-documentary/). Immediately after the airing of the show, girls with similar experiences started coming out of the woodwork. Virtually all of the girls had the same story to tell.

They began to have serious new medical conditions shortly after using Gardasil, so they would go to the doctor. According to Luise Juellund, the vast majority of doctors would tell them the HPV vaccine has no serious side effects and offer psychological problems as an alternative reason for the new symptoms.

Luise should know, her daughter is one of the seriously injured and cannot be left home alone because of daily seizures and hour-long periods of unconsciousness. After disclosing the new symptoms she was experiencing after Gardasil, she was referred for psychological evaluation. Psychiatrists cleared her and she has now been diagnosed with POTS (postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome) a suspected side effect of HPV vaccines.

According to Peter la Cour, Head of the Center for Functional Disorders in Copenhagen, the practice of refusing girls the opportunity for medical examination and treatment on the grounds that psychological problems can cause similar symptoms is terrible. He states:

The handful of girls I’ve seen has not been mentally ill, but very physically sick and disabled. We simply cannot have sick people rejected under the assumption that they are mentally ill. None of us know anything about why they are so sick. Alleged knowledge of psychological reasons is scandalous character assassination of the young women. Serious Adverse Reactions Reach One in 500

Denmark is divided into five healthcare regions. On June 1, the government established a single point of entrance in each one of these regions to accept and examine anyone suspected of having a negative reaction to Gardasil. The response was overwhelming.

The influx of girls seeking care was 60% higher than expected, suggesting the harmful effects was greater than Danish health authorities had foreseen. By June 9th, the waiting list to be evaluated was at least six to nine months long. (See map below.) Two of the five centers did not know how long the girls would have to wait.

Jesper Mehlsen from Synkopecenteret at Frederiksberg Hospital is one of the specialists who takes care of the girls. He stated:

We thought it (the serious adverse event rate) was about one in 10,000 people who had side effects. Now it turns out that there are at least two per 10 000. Suddenly it was doubled.
http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rHGpgRN2_sA/VYl6U8U7sfI/AAAAAAAApCE/7iyWA1f7pb0/s640/HPV-girls-waiting-list.bmp (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-rHGpgRN2_sA/VYl6U8U7sfI/AAAAAAAApCE/7iyWA1f7pb0/s1600/HPV-girls-waiting-list.bmp)

Unfortunately, the avalanche of girls seeking medical diagnoses and treatment after their HPV vaccinations continued to increase.

Only two days later, on June 11th, Dr. Jesper Mehlsen had to revise his estimate of the number of injured girls stating:

A realistic estimate is that one in 500 girls – or 1,000 of the 500,000 vaccinated experience serious side effects. Dr. Mehlsen helped to research the HPV vaccine and personally vaccinated 3,000 girls. Now, he operates the regional intake center in Frederiksberg and will be in charge of coordinating work across the country. He noted that as of June 11th, 360 girls had been referred for study.

Dr. Stig Gerdes fears this is only the tip of the iceberg. He stated:

It will not it surprise me if we end up reaching several thousand who have been sick. I even stopped administering Gardasil a few years ago, after vaccinating about 100 patients. More than a handful of them became ill after the vaccine. Several of them very, very seriously and completely devastated.

Is HPV vaccine safety based on mere guesswork?

Danish Health Minister, Nick Haekkerup, and the National Board of Health continue to defend the use of the HPV vaccine Gardasil despite the more than 600 young girls suspected of becoming seriously ill from the vaccine. Both still claim the vaccine is safe and the benefits outweigh the risks.

Experts who are working with the injured girls disagree. Coordinator of the Danish Society of Obstetrics and Gynecology’s national guidelines for HPV vaccination, Gynecologist Jeppe Schroll states:

We can simply not say because we do not know. There is so much uncertainty in the studies that were made on the vaccine – so it is a pure guess. It may well be that they (the health authorities) are right, but it could just as well be the opposite. His opinion is reinforced by Dr. Diane Harper, who helped develop Gardasil for Merck and stated:

There is no data to substantiate that the benefits outweigh the risks. The truth is that we know very little about the side effects of the HPV vaccine. Dr. Schroll suggests that Merck’s own analysis of possible serious side effects is based on a questionnaire which clinical trial participants completed two weeks after the vaccine was given. In the years since, women are asked whether they have received "new medical conditions."

According to Dr. Schroll, this provides a high degree of uncertainty. Some may get sick during the first 14 days, but women who become ill later may not connect it to the vaccine.

Dr. Schroll stated another source of error is that in the last major Danish/Swedish study among a million girls only looked at those with a diagnosis; not necessarily those with a list of symptoms such as debilitating paralysis of the arms and legs, pain, chronic fatigue, sudden daily fainting, daily migraines and dizziness – like the more than 600 Danish girls currently referred for evaluation.

According to Dr. Jeppe Schroll:

I think the reason why they have not found the side effects in the studies is that they have not been looking for them. Experts weigh in on HPV vaccination policy

Danish GP’s believe one should examine the many sick girls who are suspected to have had adverse reactions to Gardasil before even considering implementing Gardasil 9.

Deputy Chairman of the PLO and member of the Board of Health’s vaccination committee, Niels Urich Holm agrees, stating:

We know too little about the side effects. We fear first, that it (Gardasil 9) might have more side effects than the current one (Gardasil), which has greater side effects than other vaccines. And secondly, we believe that it would be prudent to await the investigations currently going on in all regions to find out about the disease and symptoms we have seen in a number of girls, maybe caused by the vaccine. Therefore, one should wait to introduce the new HPV vaccine, which is being approved for use in Denmark until the five new regional HPV centers have studied the sick girls who received the current vaccine properly. SF (Socialist People’s Party) spokesperson Ozlem Cekic also backed up the GP’s request that the cautionary principle be applied when she stated:

I do not understand why the National Board of Health is so eager to launch a new HPV vaccine. I think overall that the Agency has behaved foolishly in this case, where they have been too slow to react. We can see that many girls may have become ill by severe side effects. It shall be fully investigated. She also stated that the Socialist People’s Party will take HPV vaccine issues up politically after the election and shall require deeper insight into the documentation underlying the vaccine.

Health Rapporteur Liselott Blixt of the Danish People’s Party was one of the people who led the effort to get the HPV vaccine Gardasil introduced in Denmark in 2008. She now wants it abolished. She states:

The fact that we have so many, perhaps up to 5,000 young women who suddenly become so sick must have the consequence that we simply stop the vaccine. I was the first who said a big ‘yes’ to it, but now I will also be the first to abolish it, because we politicians must take responsibility for ensuring that we have adopted it. Not least in light of the fact that we do not actually have any treatment options to offer the most sick. Let’s hope the authorities in Denmark follow expert advice and make sure that young women’s health is no longer sacrificed for the promise of a benefit fifteen to twenty years from now.

No healthy young woman should have to sacrifice her health to see if a cancer prevention experiment will work!

Sources:

HPV Vaccines: A Danish Documentary (http://sanevax.org/hpv-vaccines-a-danish-documentary/)
HPV girls: Doctors say we are crazy (http://www.mx.dk/nyheder/danmark/story/18231873)
Waiting list map (http://newsvoice.se/2015/06/15/misstankt-gardasilskadade-flickor-koar-for-hjalp-i-danmark/)
More information on the backlog of patients (http://nyhederne.tv2.dk/samfund/2015-06-09-hpv-piger-stroemmer-til-nye-centre-saa-lang-er-ventetiden)
Doctors: One out of 500 girls become seriously ill from getting HPV vaccine (http://www.mx.dk/nyheder/danmark/story/21876459)
Expert: HPV girls’ safety based on mere guesswork (http://www.mx.dk/nyheder/danmark/story/28453930)
General Practitioners: Let’s wait on a new HPV vaccine (http://www.mx.dk/nyheder/danmark/story/23156994)
SF: Health behave recklessly with HPV vaccine (http://www.mx.dk/nyheder/danmark/story/21115666)

Norma Erickson is the President of SaneVax Inc. (http://sanevax.org/), where this article first appeared (http://sanevax.org/gardasil-firestorm-in-denmark/).

Flash

1st July 2015, 13:13

bumping

This is important for parents.

Here, when I refused the HPV vaccine for my daughter at the health clinic, the nurse inquired if she had all the other vaccines (to my shameful ignorant parent I was then, I had my daughter vaccinated), I said yes, but not this one.

There was zero argument, zero zero. The nurses knew that vaccine was not tested and could be dangerous. They did not tell, but did not even proposed a second time.

Hervé

1st July 2015, 13:20

Deal Reached: Wireless Remote Drug-Releasing Microchip Implants On The Assembly Line (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/deal-reached-wireless-remote-drug.html)

By Heather Callaghan (http://www.activistpost.com/search/label/Heather%20Callaghan), Tuesday, June 30, 2015

http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0M_MiywLJfA/VZKK9nTMhFI/AAAAAAAAG1g/udftZzMii0E/s320/MIT-Langer-Cima-2%2Bmichrochip%2Bimplants.png (http://3.bp.blogspot.com/-0M_MiywLJfA/VZKK9nTMhFI/AAAAAAAAG1g/udftZzMii0E/s1600/MIT-Langer-Cima-2%2Bmichrochip%2Bimplants.png)

A pharma company with generic drugs meets michrochip and biotech in a marriage of implantable devices that are shockingly close to the finish line of commercialization.

Deals were made. Money exchanged. Development in process - this is actually going to happen.

Is this the next phase of The Singularity (http://www.amazon.com/The-Singularity-Is-Near-Transcend/dp/0143037889?tag=permacultucom-20&linkCode=w13&linkID=&ref_=assoc_res_sw_cr_dka_cra_t0_result_1&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Factivistpost.net%2Fbanners%2Famazon.htm)? The complete bypassing of pills, injections - things that one actively chooses and takes - to a passive acceptance of remote controlled wireless chips quietly and somehow pumping substance for up to 16 years? Or is it more public relations for the long-time push for the coming ''brain chip'' (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/04/the-coming-brain-chip.html)?

But first to roll out will probably be the wirelessly controlled birth-control implanted device backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation.

Rob Matheson of TechSwarm reports (http://www.techswarm.com/2015/06/deal-reached-to-commercialize-microchip.html):

...Earlier this month, MIT spinout Microchips Biotech partnered with a pharmaceutical giant to commercialize its wirelessly controlled, implantable, microchip-based devices that store and release drugs inside the body over many years.
Invented by Microchips Biotech co-founders Michael Cima, the David H. Koch Professor of Engineering, and Robert Langer, the David H. Koch Institute Professor, the microchips consist of hundreds of pinhead-sized reservoirs, each capped with a metal membrane, that store tiny doses of therapeutics or chemicals. An electric current delivered by the device removes the membrane, releasing a single dose...
[...]
Now Microchips Biotech will begin co-developing microchips with Teva Pharmaceutical, the world’s largest producer of generic drugs, to treat specific diseases, with licensing potential for other products. Teva paid $35 million up front, with additional milestone payments as the device goes through clinical trials before it hits the shelves.
Langer was apparently inspired in the 1990s by microchip manufacturing to make a new drug delivery system. Cima, a chip-making expert had said, "...being out-of-this-world is not something that needs to stop anybody at MIT - In fact, that should be the criterion." Cima recalls the early trial-and-error process saying, “We were trying to find the killer application. We thought, ‘I have a hammer, what’s the right nail to hit?’” Human trials for the wireless capabilities actually took place in 2011 - then Gates got involved.

The Techswarm (http://www.techswarm.com/2015/06/deal-reached-to-commercialize-microchip.html) report goes on:

Apart from providing convenience, Microchips Biotech says these microchips could also improve medication-prescription adherence — a surprisingly costly issue in the United States.Do you hear that? Non-adherence won't be tolerated because someone or something else will be calling the shots, so to speak... According to a supportive report by the Annals of Internal Medicine, the estimated unnecessary health costs of people who don't stick to their meds is up to $100 billion to $289 billion annually.

Incidentally, that report goes on to say that a failure to follow prescriptions causes around 125,000 deaths annually and up to 10 percent of all hospitalizations. Is that on top of the 200,000 or so (http://healthmedicinecenter.net/prescription-drugs-can-kill.htm) annual deaths caused by FDA-approved prescription drugs and more from the 200,000 - 400,000 (https://www.documentcloud.org/documents/781687-john-james-a-new-evidence-based-estimate-of.html#document/p1/a117333) annual deaths from medical mistakes at the hospital? (source (http://www.propublica.org/article/how-many-die-from-medical-mistakes-in-us-hospitals))

Then we have the kicker - the first device likely to roll out:

While its first partnership is for treating chronic diseases, Microchips Biotech will continue work on its flagship product, a birth-control microchip, backed by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, that releases contraceptives and can be turned on and off wirelessly.
Cima, who now serves on the Microchips Biotech board of directors with Langer, sees this hormone-releasing microchip as one of the first implantable “artificial organs” — because it acts as a gland. “A lot of the therapies are trying to chemically trick the endocrine systems,” Cima says. “We are doing that with this artificial organ we created.”Do I really need to point out that it might not be a good idea to allow an organization that strives for depopulation to remote control women's decision whether or not they can conceive? Listen to the proud men who would be gods - it's been a long time dream of upper-echelon scientists to replace and "improve" the glandular system. It began with attempts to sew animal parts into human glands in the early 20th century, funded by Big Oil. Isn't it coincidental that one of the biggest health crises facing Americans is glandular dysfunction - including infertility?

Also, is this not an all too real metaphor for alchemy? Gold alloy for "this artificial organ we created"?

In December, I wrote about "Injectable 3D Vaccines With Programmable Particles Anticipated for Future Epidemics, (http://www.naturalblaze.com/2014/12/injectable-3d-vaccines-with.html)" along the same lines. Previously, Brandon Turbeville reported on Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation work with developing "on demand (http://www.activistpost.com/2014/01/coming-soon-on-demand-nano-vaccines.html)" nano vaccines using genetically engineered proteins.

So there we have it, three or so avenues with which the "new medicine order" will be rolling out devices that mesh us with nanotech, biotech and wireless tech all in one. Who needs individuality (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/04/the-coming-brain-chip.html) and choice when one can let someone else take the medical wheel - from some remote location...

Heather Callaghan (http://www.naturalblaze.com/search/label/Heather-Callaghan) is a natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com (http://naturalblaze.com/) and ActivistPost.com (http://activistpost.com/). Like at Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Natural-Blaze/228076017338034).

Recent posts by Heather Callaghan (http://www.activistpost.com/search/label/Heather%20Callaghan):

Study: DTaP Vaccine Is Causing Whooping Cough Resurgence (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/study-dtap-vaccine-is-causing-whooping.html)
Utah County Issues State of Emergency As It Morphs Into a Ghost Land (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/utah-county-issues-state-of-emergency.html)
Forced Vaccine Bill Author Sen. Pan Was Top Recipient of Big Pharma Cash (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/forced-vaccine-bill-author-sen-pan-was.html)

Hervé

2nd July 2015, 11:14

Probably submitted without any trace of a blink...

Proposal to temporarily sterilise all NZ teenage females should raise serious red flags (http://theleadingedgeblog.com/sterilisation/)

Leading Edge (http://theleadingedgeblog.com/author/leadingedge/) — July 1, 2015 (http://theleadingedgeblog.com/sterilisation/)

http://i1.wp.com/theleadingedgeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/7368581712_e01edbbc87_c.jpg?resize=800%2C533 (http://i1.wp.com/theleadingedgeblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2015/06/7368581712_e01edbbc87_c.jpg?resize=800%2C533)

(Photo: Kyrre Gjerstad (http://www.flickr.com/photos/kyrre_gjerstad/))

Yesterday the NZ media featured coverage of a new proposal (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11473471&ref=NZH_FBpage) that has been put forward by two “senior” academics from the University of Otago, who would like to see all young New Zealand females temporarily sterilised with long-acting chemical contraceptive implants.

In their ideal vision for the future of New Zealand young people, these academics would like temporary sterilisation to be the default policy that young girls would have to deliberately be opted out of if they didn’t want their new and still-developing fertility to be chemically shut down for months or years at a time (http://www.stuff.co.nz/life-style/parenting/big-kids/tweens-to-teens/69838572/optout-contraceptive-programme-proposed-to-curb-teen-pregnancy-rates).

No, this is not the plot of some dystopian novel or film, this really is a policy that a couple of NZ academics apparently now seriously consider to be a good idea.

To put things mildly: there is a lot to be concerned about with this proposal.

Firstly, these academics don’t seemed to have considered the possible impacts that temporarily sterilising an entire population of females from a very young age could have.

As far as I am aware, no attempt at the population-wide temporary sterilisation of very young females, whose physiology is still new and still developing, has ever been attempted – meaning that the outcome of such an experimental scheme is totally unknown.

We are talking here about synthetic hormonal interference with the female fertility system while that system is still very young and developing, and there is no reliable way of knowing how such interference could turn out (for all of us) in the long-run.

We already know that chemical contraceptives are an environmental pollutant that end up in waterways (http://www.livescience.com/20532-birth-control-water-pollution.html), and from there cause harms to wildlife populations. Imagine how devastating this environmental impact could become if every female in NZ was temporarily sterilised with these agents at a young age?

Then there are the eugenic memories from recent history that make mass sterilisation (even if it is reversible) a very unpalatable idea for most people today – the Nazis experimented with ways of trying to sterilise entire female Jewish populations (https://www.jewishvirtuallibrary.org/jsource/Holocaust/aumed.html), and in Apartheid South-Africa a similar sterilisation scheme (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Project_Coast#As_a_component_of_racial_warfare) was attempted on Black Africans.

Then there were the forced sterilisations of those considered to be ‘defective’ that took place in the United States of America (http://mic.com/articles/53723/8-shocking-facts-about-sterilization-in-u-s-history) prior to, and after World War II – not to mention those that took place in other parts of the world (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Compulsory_sterilization#By_country) as well last century.

I think people are right to be extremely wary of any attempt to introduce any sort of mass sterilisation programmes – even temporary chemical sterilisations – because these can very easily morph into state-mandated sterilisation programmes for economic or social reasons (the old saying: ‘absolute power corrupts absolutely’ is still as true today as it was the day when it was first uttered.)

And none of this even touches on the negative impact that synthetic hormonal contraceptives can have on female health and wellbeing, or the fact that such a scheme would not actually do anything to alleviate the far more serious problem of sexually transmitted diseases.

(By the way, I hoped everyone took notice of the fact that these academics have rightly pointed out (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11473471&ref=NZH_FBpage) that condoms have a failure rate of 18% per annum (that’s 18 pregnancies per year, for every 100 couples using condoms) – which makes condoms only 4% more effective than the woefully unreliable withdrawal method! This is important, because pregnancy can only occur for a very limited window each month (due to the way that female fertility works). Sexually transmitted diseases, on the other hand, can be transmitted 24/7 – meaning that condoms are a far less reliable form of protection against sexual disease than some people wrongly believe and tout them to be.)

I think that most people are rightly very concerned by this proposal for the automatic temporary sterilisation of all young New Zealand females – and for lots of very good reasons.

For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.

At the end of the day, this proposal would actually create far more social problems, and expose us to far more risks and unknown factors than we are currently experiencing in this country – which is precisely why I think that it is one of the worst health policy proposals that has been mooted in this country in quite some time.

- See more at: http://theleadingedgeblog.com/sterilisation/#sthash.urZiICti.Y66hGUlc.dpuf

Hervé

8th July 2015, 12:00

Bill Gates' Temporary Sterilization Microchip In Beta Female Testing By End of Year (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/07/bill-gates-temporary-sterilization.html)

http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cbenBnhuPw8/VZU2u8CRHHI/AAAAAAAAG5Y/qY8G-snMSSA/s320/bill%2Bgates%2Bmicro%2Bbirthcontrol%2Bchip.png (http://4.bp.blogspot.com/-cbenBnhuPw8/VZU2u8CRHHI/AAAAAAAAG5Y/qY8G-snMSSA/s1600/bill%2Bgates%2Bmicro%2Bbirthcontrol%2Bchip.png)
"Her-RA for the Brave New World!" By Heather Callaghan (http://www.activistpost.com/search/label/Heather%20Callaghan)

Earlier this week, I wrote about a deal reached that would soon be pumping out medical microchip implants (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?70016-Agenda-21-Vaccines-The-Female-Of-The-Species&p=974232&viewfull=1#post974232). Meet the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology. Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak.

The same developers who are bringing wireless remotely controlled microchip implants are actually focusing on their first flagship product: Gates Foundation-funded birth-control microchip implants. Wireless technology allows the remotely controlled chip to turn a woman's ability to conceive off or on at will - temporary sterilization. Of course with remote technology funded by eugenics depopulation fanatics, the first questions should always be, "the ability to conceive by whose will?" This would be the complete antithesis of female empowerment or a "woman's right to choose" - would it not?

The encryption is alleged to be so safe, that cyberhackers cannot break entry - that means you too.

The chip can be implanted into the hip, arms or beneath the back. Mum was the word during the last few years of development until it was finally publicly confirmed that the beta testing for the birth control chip would be starting towards the end of this year. Indeed, human volunteers will be sought for real-life chip testing.

TWCN Tech News reports (http://news.thewindowsclub.com/bill-gates-foundation-working-birth-control-chip-78981/) more details on the microchip birth-control implant:

The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. Bill Gates and Melinda foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.

The chip’s size is 20mm by 20mm by 7mm. The reservoirs of hormones would be stored on a microchip of 1.5cm. The chip’s data would always be encrypted so that others (cybercriminals or hackers) cannot access the information contained in the chip or misuse/alter or destroy it.

[...]

The release of hormones will be done by melting a part of solid hormonal stock using a small electric shock which won’t be noticed by humans.

[...]

The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018.As usual, "The main target" for the testing phase of the chips are women in third-world countries. That means African and Indian women will be human guinea pigs, subject to more of Gates' destructive horrors, like paralyzing nearly 50,000 Indian children with his polio vaccine tests. (http://www.activistpost.com/2013/01/bill-gates-says-global-vaccination.html) Or deaths/paralysis in Pakistan (http://tribune.com.pk/story/293191/vaccine-nation-globally-supported-company-is-funding-fatal-polio-shots/) and more paralysis in Africa (http://vactruth.com/2013/01/06/paralyzed-after-meningitis-vaccine/). But, I'm sure they will go back and make sure those women can conceive again, right? No one is admitting who is actually in control of the wireless capabilities of the implant that is allegedly impenetrable by hackers. Who does a woman see to have her ability to conceive turned back on? That would be an important piece of information, correct?

Interestingly, this news came right on the heels of New Zealand academic higher-ups seriously suggesting (http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/1471-0528.13465/abstract) the temporary sterilization of all young teen girls - at least in New Zealand.

Brave New World (http://www.amazon.com/Brave-New-World-Aldous-Huxley/dp/0060850523?tag=permacultucom-20&linkCode=w13&linkID=&ref_=assoc_res_sw_us_dka_cra_t0_result_1&ref-refURL=http%3A%2F%2Factivistpost.net%2Fbanners%2Famazon.htm) much?

Headlines were simply calling it "free contraception (http://www.nzherald.co.nz/lifestyle/news/article.cfm?c_id=6&objectid=11473471&ref=NZH_FBpage)" and recommending the temporary chemical shutting off of young female fertility for society's sake. No thought whatsoever to looking to solve the source of "the problem" if it even should be looked at so harshly, or to the health of developing teen girls. And just like Gates' moves in India, no real thoughts go to solving issues of impoverishment which historically, lead to blooming birth rates and medical birth issues. Why better people's lives when there is so much control in remotely and wirelessly deciding if a woman can conceive?

Pregnancy costs too much....it's inconvenient...it's bad for mother and child, and other dehumanizing reasons were given. Ethics, compulsory slippery slopes and STD concerns aside, critics zeroed in on health and environment concerns regarding chemicals. Isn't it convenient that Gates' birth-control microchip should launch to save the world from those critiques? Who needs artificial hormones when wireless voltage and gold are there to alchemically or A.I.-chemically create "an artificial organ" through biotech, according to one of its developers (http://www.activistpost.com/2015/06/deal-reached-wireless-remote-drug.html). This is where Woman meets Machine to reproduce. Now there is no reason to protest - temporary sterilization for all!

How is that for female empowerment? It requires permission...

This writer's sentiments align with the anti-eugenics op-ed piece by Leading Edge (http://theleadingedgeblog.com/sterilisation/), that said:

For me, one of the most troubling aspects of this proposal is the way in which it so flippantly treats normal healthy female fertility as if it were something that needs to be shut down or medicated against – like we would a disease, or some other physiological problem.Indeed, is the human body really worth altering to the point of switching on and off like it's an inconvenient afterthought? Why go against who you are - you are not a disease. At least you deserve to be thought of as a glorious human being, and not something to be eradicated. Worse yet, why let someone else take the wheel from a remote location?

Image by Heather Callaghan

Heather Callaghan (http://www.naturalblaze.com/search/label/Heather-Callaghan) is an independent researcher, natural health blogger and food freedom activist. You can see her work at NaturalBlaze.com (http://naturalblaze.com/) and ActivistPost.com (http://activistpost.com/). Like at Facebook (https://www.facebook.com/pages/Natural-Blaze/228076017338034).

idiit

9th July 2015, 12:48

me ( idiit ) be a guy. me (idiit) just viewed a recent Leuren Moret: How to avoid Jesuits, U.S. & Russian mind control from turning America into a NWO prison video. me love leuren moret (Berkley graduate) now. leuren moret discusses agenda 21, war on the female species, genocide programs targeting minorities, Jesuit control power system and more.

you watch video linked below. it's the best. end of story. leuren moret is an alpha female in her primal glory. you watch. :)

ok, leuren moret gives the best bird's eye, superior vantage point perspective I've seen detailing the true hidden nwo power structure.

if you want "the juice", the real deal "raw dope" you gotta take the time to watch this video done with Alfred webre at exopolitics.

I posted the below link and intro. on this thread 'cause it's the first appropriate thread I could find that is currently getting posts.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=5bWcYoUZeWM

you females ( and a few truly liberated guys) give idiiit lots of thank you's after viewing the best interview you have had the recent pleasure of viewing. :)

Hervé

13th July 2015, 10:56

Vaccines: an ideal covert op to genetically re-engineer humans
(https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/11/vaccines-an-ideal-covert-op-to-genetically-re-engineer-humans/)
by (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/11/vaccines-an-ideal-covert-op-to-genetically-re-engineer-humans/)Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Jul11 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/11/vaccines-an-ideal-covert-op-to-genetically-re-engineer-humans/), 2015

Why is the government so maniacal about injecting vaccines?

I want to extend the remarks I made about vaccines the other day (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/06/30/mandatory-vaccination-california-is-ordering-genetic-alteration/).

The reference is the New York Times, 3/15/15, “Protection Without a Vaccine.” (http://www.nytimes.com/2015/03/10/health/protection-without-a-vaccine.html) It describes the frontier of research. Here are key quotes that illustrate the use of synthetic genes to “protect against disease,” while changing the genetic makeup of humans. This is not science fiction:

“By delivering synthetic genes into the muscles of the [experimental] monkeys, the scientists are essentially re-engineering the animals to resist disease.”
“’The sky’s the limit,’ said Michael Farzan, an immunologist at Scripps and lead author of the new study.”
“The first human trial based on this strategy — called immunoprophylaxis by gene transfer, or I.G.T. — is underway, and several new ones are planned.”
“I.G.T. is altogether different from traditional vaccination. It is instead a form of gene therapy. Scientists isolate the genes that produce powerful antibodies against certain diseases and then synthesize artificial versions. The genes are placed into viruses and injected into human tissue, usually muscle.” Here is the punchline:

“The viruses invade human cells with their DNA payloads, and the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA. If all goes well, the new genes instruct the cells to begin manufacturing powerful antibodies.” Read that again:

“the synthetic gene is incorporated into the recipient’s own DNA.” Alteration of the human genetic makeup. Not just a “visit.” “Permanent residence.”

The Times article taps Dr. David Baltimore for an opinion:

“Still, Dr. Baltimore says that he envisions that some people might be leery of a vaccination strategy that means altering their own DNA, even if it prevents a potentially fatal disease.” Yes, some people might be leery. If they have two or three working brain cells.

Let’s take this further:
Under the cover of preventing disease (and all good covert ops float a laudatory goal to conceal their true intent (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/09/17/exposed-the-heroic-ebola-doctor-myth/)), vaccines are ideal carriers for all sorts of genes (http://nomorefakenews.com/dir666/vaccines-2013-300.pdf) that would be permanently incorporated into the human structure.

The enormous tonnage of propaganda (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/03/04/jimmy-kimmel-quoted-me-so-heres-more-on-vaccines/) about vaccines (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/05/19/fantasy-vaccines-remarkably-safe-and-effective/), and the resultant mandatory laws that enforce vaccination (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/04/14/australia-refuse-vaccination-lose-15000/) (without fear of liability (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/11/06/the-vaccine-mafia-and-its-jury-of-thugs-your-rulers/)), create a powerful channel along which re-engineering is eminently possible (http://experimentalvaccines.org/2015/06/29/300-new-genetically-modified-vaccines-by-2023-experimentalvaccines-interview-on-realitybitesradio/).

Synthetic genes injected into billions of humans would form a grand experiment to create an altered species. Some of this is happening already, but the Times article presents a much fuller picture of what is approaching on the immediate horizon.

This grand experiment will be compartmentalized. For example, secretly, genes 1-6 will be injected into Group A in geo-location I. Genes 7-12 will be injected into Group B in location II. And so on.

Vaccine recipients will be subjected to ongoing surveillance to gauge the results (http://cnsnews.com/news/article/barbara-hollingsworth/federal-biosurveillance-plan-seeking-direct-access-americans). On various pretexts, members of these groups will be brought into clinics for exams and tests, to discover markers that purportedly reveal their bodies’ responses to the genetic alterations.

Are these people stronger or weaker? Do they exhibit signs of illness? Do they report behavioral changes? Through surveillance and testing (http://mobihealthnews.com/42312/16-more-apple-watch-health-and-medical-apps-set-to-launch/), all sorts of information can be compiled.

Of course, there is no informed consent. The human guinea pigs have no knowledge of what is being done to them.

And what would be the objectives of this lunatic research program? They would vary. On a simplified level, there would be two. Create weaker and more docile and more obedient and more dependent humans. On the other side, create stronger and healthier and more intelligent and more talented humans. Obviously, the results of the latter experiments would be applied to the “chosen few.” And clearly, some of this research will be carried on inside the military. Secrecy is easier to maintain, and the aim to produce “better soldiers” is a long-standing goal of the Pentagon and its research arm, DARPA (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2013/08/22/the-us-government-is-bankrolling-the-engineering-of-humans/).

A global vaccine experiment of the type I’m describing here has another bonus for the planners: those people who fall ill or die can be written off as having suffered from various diseases and disorders which “have nothing to do with vaccines.” This is already SOP for the medical cartel.

The numbers of casualties, in this grand experiment, would be of no concern to the Brave New World shapers. As I’ve documented extensively, the US medical system is already killing 2.25 million people per decade (a conservative estimate) (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2014/02/09/the-starfield-revelations/), as a result of FDA-approved drugs and mistreatment in hospitals. Major media and government leaders, aware of this fact, have done nothing about it.

Here is a quote from Princeton molecular biologist, Lee Silver, the author of Remaking Eden (http://amzn.to/1SejMjG). It gives you a window into how important geneticists are thinking about an engineered future:

“The GenRich—who account for ten percent of the American population—[will] all carry synthetic genes. All aspects of the economy, the media, the entertainment industry, and the knowledge industry are controlled by members of the GenRich class…

“Naturals [unaltered humans] work as low-paid service providers or as laborers. [Eventually] the GenRich class and the Natural class will become entirely separate species with no ability to crossbreed, and with as much romantic interest in each other as a current human would have for a chimpanzee.

“Many think that it is inherently unfair for some people to have access to technologies that can provide advantages while others, less well-off, are forced to depend on chance alone, [but] American society adheres to the principle that personal liberty and personal fortune are the primary determinants of what individuals are allowed and able to do.

“Indeed, in a society that values individual freedom above all else, it is hard to find any legitimate basis for restricting the use of repro[grammed]-genetics. I will argue [that] the use of reprogenetic technologies is inevitable. [W]hether we like it or not, the global marketplace will reign supreme.” Here is another gem, from Gregory Stock (http://www.gregorystock.net/), former director of the program in Medicine, Technology, and Society at the UCLA School of Medicine:

“Even if half the world’s species were lost [during genetic experiments], enormous diversity would still remain. When those in the distant future look back on this period of history, they will likely see it not as the era when the natural environment was impoverished, but as the age when a plethora of new forms—some biological, some technological, some a combination of the two—burst onto the scene. We best serve ourselves, as well as future generations, by focusing on the short-term consequences of our actions rather than our vague notions about the needs of the distant future.” Notice that these two well-known scientists are speaking about “ethics.” It’s important to realize that a significant number of such experts have their own extremely peculiar (to say the least) version of what is right and wrong (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2012/03/15/four-foot-human-with-cats-eyes/). (See also this (http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/health/news/9113394/Killing-babies-no-different-from-abortion-experts-say.html).)

With vaccines that permanently alter human genetic makeup on the horizon, and given the corporate and government-agency penchant for secrecy, we are already inhabiting the Brave New World. It’s not a distant prospect.

Every genetic innovation is aimed at bringing us closer to a stimulus-response world (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/06/25/the-stimulus-response-empire/), and further away from freedom.

Which is why the defense of freedom becomes ever more vital.

That struggle comes down to who controls, yes, the philosophy, not the science. Is each human merely and only a system waiting to be re-engineered (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=4rnJEdDNDsI), or is he something far, far more, inhabiting a physical form?

We already know what the vast majority of brain researchers and geneticists believe, as well as the governments and corporations and universities and foundations that make important decisions.

Of course, these days, the college faculty department considered to be the least important, the most useless, a mere appendage waiting for those with wisdom to put it out of its misery and kill it off…is the philosophy department.

That leaves us to take up the argument and the resistance.

Not Lee Silver at Princeton or Gregory Stock or Bill Gates or George Soros or David Rockefeller or the Pope or Stephen Hawking or Obama or the Clintons or Monsanto or Dow or the Bush family or PBS or FOX or socialists or Communists or liberals or conservatives or some wackadoodle at Harvard or MIT or UCLA.

Us.

Jon Rappoport

Hervé

15th July 2015, 12:51

The vaccine matrix: covert birth control, female sterility (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/the-vaccine-matrix-covert-birth-control-female-sterility-2/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Jul15 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2015/07/15/the-vaccine-matrix-covert-birth-control-female-sterility-2/), 2015

“Part of the vaccine covert op involves turning humans into social constructs who can only think, in the most shallow terms, about ‘protecting the group’. Such people would lose any semblance of individuality, as well as the ability to analyze vaccines and understand what harm they do.”
(The Underground, Jon Rappoport) In the vaccine research community, it’s an open secret that the Rockefeller Fund, the UN, and other groups have been backing the development of vaccines that function as agents of population control. This work has been going on for decades.

We’re talking about inducing female sterility.

Through which vaccine? Tetanus, for example (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?70016-Agenda-21-Vaccines-The-Female-Of-The-Species&p=816739&viewfull=1#post816739), which is given with the diphtheria and pertussis vaccines in a one-shot combination.

The combination has a number of names (and the contents of the vaccines may vary to some degree): DPT, DTP, DTwP, DTaP, Tdap. Tdap is the version currently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/tetanus/default.htm).

Note: The recently mandated vaccine bill (SB277) that passed in California lists the tetanus vaccine on its schedule of shots (http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277) that must be given to every public and private school child.

Here, from BBC News (13/10/2014) is a bland denial that there is a serious problem with the tetanus vaccine. “Kenya Catholic Church tetanus fears ‘unfounded’” (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-29594091):

“Kenya’s government has dismissed allegations made by the country’s Catholic Church that a tetanus vaccine can cause sterility in women.”

“‘It’s a safe certified vaccine,’ Health Minister James Macharia told the BBC.”

“‘The [health] ministry must stop making noise and allow the Church to sample the vaccines before they are given,’ Dr Stephen Karanja, the chair of the Catholic Doctors Association in Kenya, told the BBC. He said tetanus vaccines tested earlier in the year contained an antigen – an agent that triggers antibody production by the body’s immune system – which could cause sterility in women.”

“But Mr Macharia [Health Minister] said the vaccine had been approved by the World Health Organization and Unicef.”
Let’s dig a little deeper. In fact, a lot deeper.

Here is a blockbuster article published at lifesitenews, a month after the BBC article posted above. Written by Steve Weatherbe, it reveals, among other things, that the Kenyan government and a teacher’s union were taking the Catholic Doctors Association charges very seriously.

The headline reads: “Kenyan gymt [government] launches probe into claim UN is using vaccines for ‘mass sterilization’” (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kenyan-gvmt-launches-probe-into-claim-un-is-using-vaccines-for-mass-sterili):

“The health committee of Kenya’s National Assembly has ordered an independent inquiry into the Catholic Church’s claims that a national anti-tetanus vaccination campaign is covering for a sterilization scheme aimed at suppressing the country’s population.

“The news comes as health ministry officials have called for professional discipline against Dr. Stephen Karanja, head of Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association, who raised the alarm about the vaccine.

“At the same time, a teacher’s union has called for a boycott of the vaccination campaign until Catholic claims are disproven.

“The Health Ministry, which is conducting the five-injection, two-year vaccination project on female Kenyans aged 14-49, and the vaccine’s supplier, the World Health Organization, deny the claims of the Church, which has called all along for an independent inquiry.

“Robert Pukose, the government MP who is vice-chairman of the National Assembly’s health committee, explained, ‘We are at loss about who to believe since both sides have tabled [submitted] conflicting results. That is why we need new tests conducted jointly for us to give final and conclusive results,’ according to the Nairobi Standard.

“The inquiry will consist of submitting vaccine samples to a committee of Catholic, government, and independent medical experts. What they will be looking for are traces of HCG, a female hormone produced during pregnancy, which if injected along with traces of tetanus, will produce antibodies. And just as these antibodies will react to a real tetanus infection, so will they react to a pregnancy, causing a miscarriage.

“The Health Ministry submitted its test results on the tetanus vaccine to the committee last week, showing no trace of HCG.

“This week the Catholic bishops’ doctors presented their own test results, all of which showed traces of HCG. Karanja told the committee, ‘The hormone, Beta HCG, is neither a byproduct of, nor a component required for, the manufacture of the tetanus vaccine. It being part of the vaccine is nothing short of a scheme to forcefully render our women incapable of bearing children.’

“The Health Ministry’s Immunization Technical Group, Dr. Collins Tabu, challenged the validity of the Catholic doctors’ test results, asking, ‘Were the samples sent to the labs indeed vaccines? Were they sent in their primary containers and what was the condition of storage? What types of tests were run on them?’

“Unless the tests were done at either of two specialized government labs, they could not be valid, he added.

“But the Kenyan Catholic doctors have told LifeSiteNews via email that the government won’t let anyone get samples of the vaccine for tests—the ones used had to be obtained surreptitiously by devout Catholics. All along the doctors wanted to conduct tests jointly with the government but could not get co-operation.

“Dr. Karanja also told the committee the tests were simple and could be conducted at any lab. Dr. Pukose further undermined Tabu’s argument, noting that both the Health Ministry and the Catholics had submitted results from the Lancet Kenya lab—with contradictory findings.

“Meanwhile Akello Misori, secretary general of the Kenya Union of Post Primary Education (Kuppet), advised women to avoid the tetanus shots…

“One big reason for the Church’s concern is that the vaccines are provided by the World Health Organization and UNICEF, two United Nations organizations with a documented involvement in developing a sterilization vaccine using the HCG hormone as an antigen.

“Karanja’s colleague Dr. Wahome Ngare told LifeSiteNews, ‘WHO conducted massive vaccinations campaigns using the tetanus vaccine laced with HCG in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and Philippines in 1994.’ The opposition of the Catholic Church stopped those drives. [emphasis added]

“’What is downright immoral and evil,’ said Ngare, ‘is that the tetanus laced with HCG was given as a fertility-regulating vaccine without disclosing its contraceptive effect to the girls and the mothers. As far as they were concerned, they had gone for an innocent injection to prevent neonatal tetanus.’

“…The [Kenya] National Assembly’s Dr. Pukose issued a stern warning after announcing the joint investigation, saying, ‘Those found to have been misleading Kenyans, whether it is the experts advising the Catholic Church or the Ministry of Health, will be held individually accountable. Playing with the safety and health of Kenyans is a criminal matter.’” I have made inquiries about the final disposition of the Kenyan government inquiry, and so far I’ve received no answers. It’s possible that the government has left the matter unresolved.

Here is additional background on attempts to develop a vaccine that would cause pregnant women to miscarry.

An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385 (http://www.fasebj.org/content/7/14/1381.full.pdf). Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

A quote from the paper:

“Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).” A birth control vaccine?

Yes.

A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve non-pregnancy where it ordinarily could occur. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting.

Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the FASEB paper (p.1382) called “Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG.” The authors are trying to discover whether a state of non-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG.

Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49, 1993. “Contraceptive Vaccines.” (http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/1/88.abstract) The authors—RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.

“Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials, involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered … incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides … Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies…”
[emphasis added] The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. Training a woman’s body to react against one of its own secreted hormones. The authors state, “The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

Stop the female body from recognizing a state of pregnancy. Get the body to treat the natural hormone hCG as an intruder, a disease agent, and mobilize the forces of the immune system against it. Create a synthetic effect, an engineered effect, by which the mother’s “maternal endocrine system” does not swing into gear when pregnancy occurs. The result? The embryo in the mother is swept away by her next period—since hGC, which signals the existence of the pregnancy and halts menstruation cycles, is now treated as a disease entity.

The authors put it this way:

“In principle, the induction of immunity against hGC should lead to a sequence of normal, or slightly extended, menstrual cycles during which any pregnancies would be terminated…”
Miscarriage would then be the “normal” state of affairs. These authors leave no doubt about who the target of this vaccine would be:

“During the next decade the world’s population is set to rise by around 500 million. Moreover, because the rates of population growth in the developing countries of Africa, South America, and Asia will be so much greater than the rest of the world, the distribution of this dramatic population growth will be uneven…”
Two other vaccine methods are described. They “aim to prevent conception by interfering with the intricate cascade of interactive events that characterize the union of male and female gametes at fertilization.”

The diphtheria and tetanus vaccines would function as a social and political mask—to hide the sterilizing intent, as millions of women in the Third World would receive vaccines they’re told would protect them against infections and disease.

A letter to a medical journal, The Lancet, p.1222, Volume 339, May 16, 1992. “Cameroon: Vaccination and politics.” (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PII0140-6736%2892%2991151-W/fulltext) Peter Ndumbe and Emmanuel Yenshu, the authors of this letter, report on their efforts to analyze widespread popular resistance to a tetanus vaccine given in the northwest province of Cameroon.

Two of the reasons women rejected the vaccine: it was given only to “females of childbearing age,” and people heard that a “sterilizing agent” was present in the vaccine.

The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, in his piece “Real U.S. Policy in Third World: Sterilization : Disregard the ’empowerment’ shoe polish—the goal is to keep the natives from breeding,” (http://articles.latimes.com/1994-09-08/local/me-35791_1_shoe-polish) reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”

“… the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.’” In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people.

Jon Rappoport

Hervé

31st January 2016, 18:54

Cross posting here as well:

Is Zika Virus Or The Tdap Vaccine Causing Birth Defects In Brazil? (http://yournewswire.com/is-zika-virus-or-the-dtap-vaccine-causing-birth-defects-in-brazil/)

Posted on January 28, 2016 by Carol Adl (http://yournewswire.com/author/phytoforce/)

http://cdns.yournewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2016/01/Zika-virus1-675x350.jpg

The Zika virus has been known to infect people in Africa, South and Central America and Asia for more than 70 years without causing any birth defects.

The Brazilian government declared an emergency in December after 2,400 babies (http://yournewswire.com/brazil-declares-emergency-as-zika-virus-is-linked-to-birth-defects/) were found to be born with shrunken heads and brain defects believed to be linked to mosquitoes carrying the Zika Virus. The number of babies born with the defects has been rising significantly since then.

But could there be a link between the introduction of the Tdap vaccination that women in Latin America were urged to get before they were 22 weeks pregnant, and the birth of babies with these deformities called “Microcephaly” (literally ‘tiny head’)?

The following is an article from Brazilian shrunken head babies (https://brazilianshrunkenheadbabies.wordpress.com/about/) blog:
In late 2014, the Ministry of Health of Brazil announced the introduction of the Tdap (Tetanus, diphtheria, and acellular pertussis) vaccine for all pregnant women in that country as part of its routine vaccination program. The move was aimed at trying to contain the resurgence of pertussis in Brazil.

In December 2015, the Brazilian government declared an emergency after 2,400 Brazilian babies were found to be born with shrunken heads (microcephaly) and damaged brains since October.

Brazilian public health officials don’t know what is causing the increase in microcephaly cases in babies born in Brazil, but they are theorizing that it may be caused by a virus known as “Zika,” which is spread by mosquitoes (Aedes aegypti)—in the same way as is the West Nile virus.

The theory is largely based on the fact that they found the Zika virus in a baby with microcephaly following an autopsy of the dead child. The virus was also found in the amniotic fluid of two mothers whose babies had the condition.

Note that Zika is not a new virus; it has been around for decades. No explanation has been given as to why suddenly it could be causing all these cases of microcephaly. No one is seriously asking the question, “What has changed?”

There is no theorizing about the possibility that the cases of microcephaly could be linked to the mandating of the Tdap vaccine for all pregnant women in Brazil about 10 months earlier. The government has “assumed” the cause is a virus.

FACT—Drug companies did not test the safety and effectiveness of giving Tdap vaccine to pregnant women before the vaccines were licensed in the U.S. and there is almost no data on inflammatory or other biological responses to this vaccine that could affect pregnancy and birth outcomes.

FACT—According to the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) adequate testing has not been done in humans to demonstrate safety for pregnant women and it is not known whether the vaccines can cause fetal harm or affect reproduction capacity. The manufacturers of the Tdap vaccine state that human toxicity and fertility studies are inadequate and warn that Tdap should “be given to a pregnant woman only if clearly needed.”

FACT—There are ingredients pertussis containing Tdap vaccine that have not been fully evaluated for potential genotoxic or other adverse effects on the human fetus developing in the womb that may negatively affect health after birth, including aluminum adjuvants, mercury containing (Thimerosal) preservatives and many more bioactive and potentially toxic ingredients.

FACT—There are serious problems with outdated testing procedures for determining the potency and toxicity of pertussis vaccines and some scientists are calling for limits to be established for specific toxin content of pertussis-containing vaccines.

FACT—There are no published biological mechanism studies that assess pre-vaccination health status and measure changes in brain and immune function and chromosomal integrity after vaccination of pregnant women or their babies developing in the womb.

FACT—Since licensure of Tdap vaccine in the U.S., there have been no well designed prospective case controlled studies comparing the health outcomes of large groups of women who get pertussis containing Tdap vaccine during pregnancy either separately or simultaneously compared to those who do not get the vaccines, and no similar health outcome comparisons of their newborns at birth or in the first year of life have been conducted. Safety and effectiveness evaluations that have been conducted are either small, retrospective, compare vaccinated women to vaccinated women or have been performed by drug company or government health officials using unpublished data.

FACT—FACT—The FDA has licensed Tdap vaccines to be given once as a single dose pertussis booster shot to individuals over 10 or 11 years old. The CDC’s recommendation that doctors give every pregnant woman a Tdap vaccination during every pregnancy—regardless of whether a woman has already received one dose of Tdap—is an off-label use of the vaccine.

FACT—Injuries and deaths from pertussis-containing vaccines are the most compensated claims in the federal Vaccine Injury Compensation Program (VICP) and influenza vaccine injuries and deaths are the second most compensated claim.

FACT—A 2013 published study evaluating reports of acute disseminated encephalomyelitis (ADEM) following vaccination in the U. S. Vaccine Adverse Events Reporting System (VAERS) and in a European vaccine reaction reporting system found that pertussis containing DTaP was among the vaccines most frequently associated with brain inflammation in children between birth and age five.

Tdap is manufactured by two pharmaceutical companies: Sanofi Pasteur of France and GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) of the United Kingdom.

The Sanofi Pasteur product contains aluminum phosphate, residual formaldehyde, residual glutaraldehyde, and 2-phenoxyethanola, along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: Stainer-Scholte medium, casamino acids, dimethyl-beta-cyclodextrin, glutaraldehyde, formaldehyde, aluminum phosphate, modified Mueller-Miller casamino acid medium without beef heart infusion, ammonium sulfate, 2-phenoxyethanol, water for injection.

The GSK product contains aluminum hydroxide, sodium chloride, residual formaldehyde, polysorbate 80 (Tween 80), along with the following growth mediums and process ingredients: modified Latham medium derived from bovine casein, Fenton medium containing bovine extract, formaldehyde, Stainer-Scholte liquid medium, glutaraldehyde, aluminum hydroxide.

Unsurprisingly, the Brazilian government announced on January 15, 2016 it will direct funds to a biomedical research center (Sao Paulo-based Butantan Institute) to help develop a vaccine against Zika. Development of the vaccine is expected to take 3-5 years. Again, no consideration to the irony that you may be developing a vaccine to address a problem that may have been CAUSED by a vaccine, and that that new vaccine may COMPOUND the problem No consideration to the possibility that the answer to the problem may not be to do MORE, but rather to do LESS (simply STOP giving Tdap to pregnant women).

The number of cases of microcephaly in Brazil has grown to 3,530 babies, as of mid-January 2016. Fewer than 150 such cases were seen in all of 2014.

Most of the microcephaly cases have been concentrated in Brazil’s poor northeast, though cases in Rio de Janeiro and other big cities have also been on the rise, prompting people to stock up on mosquito repellent. Health officials are warning Brazilians—especially pregnant women—to stay inside when possible and wear plenty of bug spray if they have to go out.

Wanna look up the ingredients in mosquito spray? Oh, and what deadly insecticide do you reckon they’ll mass fumigate with? DDT perhaps?

(Note. Contains information pieced together—often copy and pasted—from newspaper articles and information from the National Vaccine Information Center.)

Related:
Hello? Pesticides can cause congenital abnormalities… January 28, 2016 (https://vaccinesbytheoutliers.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/hello-pesticides-can-cause-congenital-abnormalities/)

Hervé

5th February 2016, 13:21

Zika: vicious fraud: abortions at sea: the war on women

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Feb4 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/02/04/zika-vicious-fraud-abortions-at-sea-the-war-on-women/), 2016

You’re a pregnant woman in Central America. You’ve just been told you could have the Zika virus. No tests. No confirmation. And of course, no one is telling you that Zika has not been proved to cause anything (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/01/28/is-the-dreaded-zika-virus-another-giant-scam/). But you’re offered an abortion at sea, because the country you live in doesn’t allow abortions, except in very restricted cases. A group will take you out on a ship, and when you come back your baby will be gone. He or she will never be born. You’re just another casualty in the campaign to provoke fear, but now it has been your very personal experience.

February 3, 2016. Vocative.com has the story, “Pregnant Zika victims will be given access to abortions at sea” (http://www.vocativ.com/news/279293/pregnant-zika-victims-will-be-given-access-to-abortions-at-sea/):

“Now Women on Waves, an organization which uses ships to offer safe abortion services outside the territorial waters of countries where the procedure is restricted or forbidden, has announced that they will begin serving areas affected by Zika.”

“Women on Waves is aiming to give them [pregnant women] a safe, legal alternative. They will provide medical abortions to pregnant women who have Zika in Colombia, Bolivia, Chile, Guadeloupe, Paraguay, Venezuela, Argentina, Surinam, Guatemala, Honduras, El Salvador, Panama, Haiti, and the Dominican Republic. Eligible women must be less than 9 weeks pregnant and are required to fill out an online application to receive the abortifacient drugs. The group has said getting a shipment of the medicine to patients can take between one and five weeks, meaning it will require a woman who discovers she’s pregnant to act very quickly to receive help in time.” As I’ve detailed in previous articles (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/category/zika/), the original propaganda which launched the whole Zika-birth defect hysteria, has been contradicted by Brazilian researchers (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/01/31/zika-freaka-the-other-shoe-drops-lying-about-case-numbers/) who’ve gone back and rechecked the findings. They’ve found far, far fewer cases of the birth defect, microcephaly, and only a handful of cases where the Zika virus was present.

But this hasn’t stopped the fear mongers. And now we have abortions at sea, based on zero truth and zero science.

Put this together with the travel warnings governments have been issuing to women, and the advisories (“don’t get pregnant for two years” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/world/the_americas/as-zika-virus-spreads-el-salvador-asks-women-not-to-get-pregnant-until-2018/2016/01/22/1dc2dadc-c11f-11e5-98c8-7fab78677d51_story.html)), and this is turning out to be a war against women.

Depopulation by press conference.

Who will be held responsible? No one.

Unless people begin to speak out and ignore the roar of the press and the lying public health agencies.

The abortions will continue. Pregnant women will never know the truth, that the loss of their children was created by propaganda.

Margaret Chan, the director of the World Health Organization, has admitted that the causal connection between microcephaly (the birth defect) and the Zika virus has not been demonstrated. It is “strongly suspected.” (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/to-your-health/wp/2016/02/01/zika-virus-who-declares-global-public-health-emergency-given-rapid-spread-in-americas/) However, in order to respond quickly to the “crisis,” the world must act on a suspicion (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/02/02/zika-hoax-five-things-that-will-happen-next/).

Someone should point out to her that abortions at sea are now a consequence of what her advisors have told her to suspect.

Jon Rappoport

onawah

11th February 2016, 17:57

Bill Gates to introduce remote-controlled sterilization microchips for women
By: Tara ParasDate: February 11, 2016
http://www.newstarget.com/2016-02-11-bill-gates-to-introduce-remote-controlled-sterilization-microchips-for-women.html

Bill Gates, Microsoft mogul, inventor and philanthropist, is considered to be one of the world’s biggest and most famous visionaries. Unfortunately, however, Gates has decided to take his vision a step further, by developing a computer chip technology that could essentially aid him in his quest for population control and reduction.

Gates’ medical microchip implants are intended to serve as “the new face of medicine that polygamously marries Big Pharma, biotech, nanotech and wireless remote technology,” if Activist Post’s Heather Callaghan has any say in the matter.

“Maybe hooking oneself into the Internet of Things will be an additional app, although this sounds like a passive form of medicine where someone else gets to call the shots, so to speak,” she added.

Pro-choice or no choice?
Unsurprisingly, the same developers who are bringing wireless, remote-controlled implants are currently focused on a product that is the cornerstone of future efforts: Gates Foundation-funded birth control microchip implants.

The wireless implants are intended to essentially activate a woman’s ability to conceive, or prevent it, at will, thereby amounting to temporary sterilization. Just imagine: If an all-powerful government agency decides to prevent a woman from bearing child, the government could transform itself from “pro-choice” (by giving women the option of abortion) to no choice at all.(1)

Moreover, the chips are to be encrypted; thus, neither cyber criminals nor technologically gifted individuals could try to bypass the government, you know, if it ever decides to utilize the implants for less than charitable purposes.

Why encrypt the chips, anyway?
As reported by TheWindowsClub.com:

“The birth control chip is the brain child of a professor, Robert Langer, from Massachusetts Institute of Technology. The Bill Gates and Melinda Foundation has funded the research and the prototype is ready for human testing. The chips will be ready for sale by the year 2018 according to Robert Langer. The institute’s Chip Foundation and Bill Gates’ Foundation have been working on the birth control chip for past three years.

“The safety tests would begin by the end of year 2015 and Robert Langer is confident that the chips will hit market sometime in 2018. The main target of these chips are women in third world who are often subject to pain and risks of death during early pregnancies.”

That report also mentions that the chip is expected to remain viable for at least 16 years once implanted.

While the supposed intentions behind the chip could be seen as admirable, there’s no denying the fact that sinister motives could make such technology susceptible to abuse. Now, just a food for thought: If women from third world countries really are the target demographic of the chip, is encryption really necessary? How many third world populations have the ability to hack into these chips, anyway?

Once the chip officially enters the market, we’ll see.

Source used:

NaturalNews.com

News.TheWindowsClub.com

TruthWiki.org

Science.NaturalNews.com

Also see: http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?86375-Lawyer-How-to-Stand-Up-Against-Mandatory-Vaccination&p=1045447&viewfull=1#post1045447

Hervé

26th March 2016, 18:39

Journal editor who removed negative study on Gardasil is Merck-insider (http://thefreethoughtproject.com/merck-insider-caught-deleting-peer-reviewed-study-linking-behavioral-abnormalities-gardasil)

Matt Agorist The Free Thought Project (http://thefreethoughtproject.com/merck-insider-caught-deleting-peer-reviewed-study-linking-behavioral-abnormalities-gardasil) Fri, 25 Mar 2016 00:00 UTC

http://www.sott.net/image/s15/310447/large/gardasil.jpg (http://www.sott.net/image/s15/310447/full/gardasil.jpg)

On January 9, 2016, a study titled "Behavioral abnormalities in young female mice following administration of aluminum adjuvants and the human papillomavirus vaccine Gardasil" was published by the journal Vaccine.

The study (http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0264410X16000165?via=sd&cc=y), which had gone through Vaccine's "extensive peer review process" consisted of dividing 76 female mice into four groups and testing the effects of injecting them with the vaccine. The study's findings were not good press for Merck's Gardasil.

The Vaccine Reaction (http://www.thevaccinereaction.org/2016/03/blacklisting-of-gardasil-studies-to-silence-the-safety-debate/) explains:

Each group of mice received injections of Gardasil; Gardasil plus pertussis toxin; aluminum adjuvant alone, or a "true" placebo (as opposed to an aluminum-containing placebo typically used in Gardasil pre-licensure trials).

During three- and six-month observation periods, researchers found that compared with placebo-controlled mice, the mice injected with Gardasil or aluminum adjuvant spent significantly more time floating in the forced swimming test, which was a measure of depression used for rodents. After ruling out a connection between increased floating time and locomotor dysfunction through other testing, the researchers determined that these behavioral abnormalities were "likely due to depression."

In maze tests, aluminum-injected mice also exhibited short-term memory impairment and increased anxiety compared with the placebo-controlled mice in other rodent tests. The research team concluded that Gardasil via its aluminum adjuvant and HPV antigens may "trigger neuroinflammation and autoimmune reactions, further leading to behavioral changes." The study was conducted by eight scientists at Tel Aviv University in Israel, co-authored by a University of British Columbia professor and neuroscientist, and a doctor of biochemistry. When it was originally submitted, the group was told that the study was accepted. However, one month after it was published "with revisions," the study was completely withdrawn from the international journal.

The Vaccine Reaction reports that when Vaccine first pulled the article, the publisher offered no explanation, saying the article was "temporarily removed."

Weeks later, the page where the article used to be was updated to read:

This article has been withdrawn at the request of the Editor-in-Chief due to serious concerns regarding the scientific soundness of the article. Review by the Editor-in-Chief and evaluation by outside experts, confirmed that the methodology is seriously flawed, and the claims that the article makes are unjustified. As an international peer-reviewed journal we believe it is our duty to withdraw the article from further circulation, and to notify the community of this issue. The Editor-in-Chief who found this "seriously flawed" methodology just so happens to be an industry insider.

Jeffery Jaxen, writing for Health Impact News (http://healthimpactnews.com/2016/did-two-medical-journals-just-blacklist-gardasil-research-showing-dangers-of-the-vaccine/) points out the serious conflict of interests surrounding the journal's Editor-in-Chief.

The Editor-in-Chief of Vaccine is Dr. Gregory Poland who personally rejected the recent Gardasil HPV study. The Mayo clinic's website (http://www.newswise.com/articles/a-physician-s-guide-for-anti-vaccine-parents) has this to say about Dr. Poland:

"Dr. Poland is the chairman of a safety evaluation committee for investigational vaccine trials being conducted by Merck Research Laboratories. Dr. Poland offers consultative advice on new vaccine development to Merck & Co., Inc."

Dr. Poland has conducted four studies to date (https://mayoclinic.pure.elsevier.com/en/persons/gregory-a-poland%283ade76c3-195d-4ad3-805b-acec6973be84%29/institutions.html) with direct affiliation to Merck.

One such study that now comes into question was the pro-HPV trial from 2005 published in Mayo Clinic Proceedings (https://mayoclinic.pure.elsevier.com/en/publications/immunogenicity-and-reactogenicity-of-a-novel-vaccine-for-human-papillomavirus-16%28923ecbf0-802d-4ccb-8197-35f7d248ce85%29.html) titled Immunogenicity and reactogenicity of a novel vaccine for human papillomavirus 16: A 2-year randomized controlled clinical trial. Dr. Poland's 2005 pro-Gardasil study was published one year before the approval of Gardasil by the U.S. Food and Drug Administration in 2006. In addition, Dr. Poland acted as a Safety Monitor (http://www.mayoclinicproceedings.org/article/S0025-6196%2811%2963091-7/references) for two other clinical trials of HPV vaccines funded by Merck Research Laboratories

In 2012 Dr. Poland and Dr. Jacobson authored The Clinician's Guide to the Anti-Vaccinationists' Galaxy (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120423131344.htm) published in the journal Human Immunology. Poland's co-author on the article, Dr. Jacobson (https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2012/04/120423131344.htm), is himself a member of a safety review committee for a post-licensure study funded by Merck & Co. concerning the safety of a HPV vaccine. Regardless of one's views on the issue of vaccines, the censoring of an independent study that shows the potential harms of a widely-distributed vaccination, by a person affiliated with the group directly responsible for said vaccination, is inherently unethical.

What does it say about the peer-review process when one well-connected industry insider can retract an entire study conducted by nearly a dozen professionals in the field?

It seems that observation and experimentation have morphed into controlling the narrative by blacklisting any conflicting information. How is it that people can see the corruption involved in the manufacturing and marketing processes of prescription drugs, but when it comes to vaccines, merely questioning the claims of safety by the very same companies, is tantamount to witchcraft?

Related:
Did Two Medical Journals Just Blacklist Gardasil Research Showing Dangers of the Vaccine? (http://healthimpactnews.com/2016/did-two-medical-journals-just-blacklist-gardasil-research-showing-dangers-of-the-vaccine/)

Curious77

15th April 2016, 05:29

mpennery -- Thank you and I hope to be here tomorrow reading more --
Yes, since I discovered the subject and read a good bit about it, it seemed clear to me that vaccines are extremely harmful.
And have the potential to be even more than simply harmful.
But, don't we have a responsibility to try to break thru that obstinacy which has been so well taught to people -- where even some of our allegedly "liberal" websites have made the subject taboo -- and to get as much information about the subject out to other Americans?
Are citizens this well trained in other countries where they will tell one another to "best thing just ignore any vaccine post you come across?"

And if you felt there was a responsibility -- and if there was an opening on a website -- could you give some hints at to what information you would use first to wake up fellow posters?

And what would be the most important things to tell them?
And then, how to continue on.

The expectation is that these are posters who are intelligent and thoughtful.
But, as we know, one can always be surprised in one direction or another.
How do we bring them in and get them wondering?

What are the most powerful arguments the other side have?

Back tomorrow --

PS: As I've looked at the Dr. Wm. Thompson revelations -- and perhaps even before I began to realize ....
I don't any longer think there is any validity to the vaccination concept.

Yes -- our local doctors would tell us to go try to catch German measles from someone in the neighborhood
who had it -- while we were young and not pregnant.

But that isn't what vaccination is about.
Injecting something into muscle and into bloodstreams is entirely different.
No comparison.
I'm an anti-vaxxer now.

And more.

Hervé

16th April 2016, 19:57

Lead Developer Of HPV Vaccines Comes Clean To Warn Parents & Young Girls (http://www.collective-evolution.com/2016/04/12/lead-developer-of-hpv-vaccines-comes-clean-to-warn-parents-young-girls/)

By Arjun Walia (http://www.collective-evolution.com/author/arjun/) April 12, 2016 .

http://cdn2.collective-evolution.com/assets/uploads/2016/04/gard.jpg

Gardasil, the vaccine that supposedly protects young girls from the human papillomavirus and the cervical cancer which it can lead to, has come under intense scrutiny from medical professionals around the world over the past few years.

Unfortunately, mainstream media outlets rarely if ever share information related to this scrutiny, despite the many eye-opening revelations which have made their way into the public domain.

This is why I commonly write about the HPV vaccine and continue to push this information; because it’s not really openly discussed, but should be.

One of these revelations comes from Dr. Dianne Harper, one of a select few specialists in OB/GYN (in the world) who helped design and carry out the Phase II and Phase III safety and effectiveness studies to get Gardasil approved. There are only 50 HPV experts in the world, and Dr. Harper is one of them, inarguably making her an expert on the subject.

Since Harper’s involvement in getting Gardasil approved, she has condemned the vaccine, stating that it is neither safe nor effective. She has mentioned that the tested length of the efficacy of the vaccines in preventing HPV infection is not long enough to prevent cervical cancer, which, as she states, can take decades to develop. She has also stated that vaccination will not decrease the number of cervical cancer cases, but a routine of regular pap smears will.

Of all the women who get an HPV infection, approximately 70 percent of those will clear that infection all by themselves in the first year. You don’t even have to detect it or treat it. Within two years, approximately 90 percent of those women will clear it all by themselves. By three years, you will have 10 percent of that original group of women left who still have an HPV infection, and 5 percent of this 10 percent will have progressed into a pre-cancerous lesion. So,
“now you have that small group of women who have pre-cancerous lesions and now let’s look at that moving into invasive carcinoma. What we know then is that amongst women with. . . [pre-cancerous] lesions. . . it takes five years for about twenty percent of them to become invasive carcinomas. That’s a pretty slow process. It takes about thirty years for forty percent of them to become invasive cervical carcinomas.” (source (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sSdCxgF0blc)) This begs the question, why do nine-year old girls need vaccinations for symptomless venereal diseases that their immune systems kill anyway?

Harper has told CBS (http://www.cbsnews.com/news/gardasil-researcher-speaks-out/)that these vaccines are essentially useless, explaining that
“the benefit to public health is nothing, there is no reduction in cervical cancers, they are just postponed, unless the protection lasts for at least 15 years, and over 70% of all sexually active females of all ages are vaccinated.” She also goes on to caution of their dangers:

Parents and women must know that deaths occurred. Not all deaths that have been reported were represented in Dr. Slade’s work, one-third of the death reports were unavailable to the CDC, leaving the parents of the deceased teenagers in despair that the CDC is ignoring the very rare but real occurrences that need not have happened if parents were given information stating that there are real, but small risks of death surrounding the administration of Gardasil. “It is a vaccine that’s been highly marketed, the benefits are over-hyped, and the dangers are underestimated.” – Dr. Chris Shaw, Professor at the University of British Columbia, in the department of Neuroscience, Ophthalmology, and Visual Sciences (Taken from the One More Girl documentary (https://www.facebook.com/pages/One-More-Girl/136725669714295))

“When one looks at the independent literature, so studies which are not sponsored by the vaccine manufacturers, so with relation to Gardasil there have been several reports documenting multiple sclerosis and encephalitis, which is brain inflammation, in girls who have received their Gardasil vaccine. So just because a study sponsored by the manufacturers does not identify problems with the vaccine does not necessarily mean that the vaccine is safe. In fact if one looks at the manufacturer studies, they’re often not designed to detect serious adverse events. There was a study done by a group of researchers sponsored by Glaxo Smith and Kline and they were looking at Cervarix, which is another HPV vaccine, and the authors acknowledged that none of the studies that they evaluated have been designed to detect autoimmune diseases. So obviously, you’re not going to find what you’re not looking for. And in spite of these obvious flaws, they concluded that there is no evidence that Cervarix is associated with increased risk for autoimmune diseases, and this is absurd because you haven’t looked for it, the study has not been designed to detect autoimmune diseases.”

Hervé

8th May 2016, 12:49

Vaccines: the new government attack on pregnant women
(https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/vaccines-the-new-government-attack-on-pregnant-women/)
by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) May7 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/05/07/vaccines-the-new-government-attack-on-pregnant-women/), 2016

Ferocious vaccine manufacturers are constantly on the move, looking for new “demographics” to shoot with vaccines. If they could stick a needle into a rock and get paid for it, they would find a reason to do it.

But in this case, we’re talking about pregnant women.

Protection, protection, protection—that’s the cover the government keeps pushing.

Meanwhile, the vaccines they’re foisting on pregnant women have a track record of damage.

Barbara Loe Fisher, head of the National Vaccine Information Center (http://www.nvic.org/), has the story, so I’ll let her tell it. These are excerpts from her testimony before the Nov. 13, 2015 “meeting of the FDA Vaccines & Related Biological Products Advisory Committee (VRBPAC) on proposed changes to FDA requirements for licensure of vaccines intended for use during pregnancy” (http://www.fda.gov/AdvisoryCommittees/CommitteesMeetingMaterials/BloodVaccinesandOtherBiologics/VaccinesandRelatedBiologicalProductsAdvisoryCommittee/ucm427602.htm):

Fisher (“FDA Prepares to Fast Track New Vaccines Targeting Pregnant Women,” (http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/November-2015/fda-to-fasttrack-vaccines-targeting-pregnant-women.aspx) 11/17/2016):

“In 2006, CDC officials directed doctors to give all pregnant women a flu shot and, in 2011, a Tdap shot during every pregnancy, no matter how little time has elapsed between pregnancies. Prior to FDA licensure, influenza, diphtheria, tetanus and pertussis vaccines [Tdap and flu shots] were not tested in or proven safe and effective for pregnant women in large clinical trials when given during every pregnancy either singly or simultaneously.”
“Categorized by FDA as Pregnancy Category B and C biologicals because it is not known whether the vaccines are genotoxic and can cause fetal harm or can affect maternal fertility and reproduction, administering influenza and Tdap vaccines to pregnant women is an off-label use of these vaccines. It is a policy that assumes maternal vaccination is necessary, safe and effective without proving it.”
“…pertussis containing vaccine [Tdap] injuries and deaths are the most compensated claim in the federal vaccine injury compensation program (VICP) for infants and children, while influenza vaccine-related injuries and deaths are the most compensated claim for adults. And yet, in the absence of credible biological mechanism and epidemiologic evidence pre-licensure proving these vaccines are safe for all pregnant women, their fetuses and newborns, female health care workers are being fired for refusing to be injected with them while they are pregnant.”

“The National Vaccine Information Center is opposed to FDA retroactively licensing influenza and Tdap vaccines for use in pregnant women and fast tracking RSV [respiratory syncytial virus] and group strep B vaccines to licensure…” No evidence of safety, but so what? Reports of injuries and deaths, but so what?

Pregnant women are a “lucrative market,” and that’s all that counts.

Need a terrific target for further disabling the population? Pregnant women are ideal.

The FDA and its army of allies will assure you that these untested and off-label uses for vaccines are perfectly safe, because all vaccines are safe.

The FDA speaks for the pharmaceutical industry. Yesterday, today, and tomorrow.

It might be tempting to say the FDA is careless, is overlooking important factors—but it’s much, much worse than that.

Here are excerpts from a 2012 piece of mine about an FDA drug reviewer, and what happened to him when he went against the grain, and opposed his bosses on judgments about what was safe medicine and what was dangerous medicine:

—In a stunning interview with Truthout’s Martha Rosenberg, former FDA drug reviewer, Ronald Kavanagh, exposes the FDA as a relentless criminal mafia protecting its client, Big Pharma, with a host of mob strategies (“Former FDA Reviewer Speaks Out About Intimidation, Retaliation and Marginalizing of Safety,” (http://www.truth-out.org/news/item/10524-former-fda-reviewer-speaks-out-about-intimidation-retaliation-and-marginalizing-of-safety) 7/29/2012).
Kavanagh: “…widespread [FDA] racketeering, including witness tampering and witness retaliation.”

“I was threatened with prison.”

“One [FDA] manager threatened my children…I was afraid that I could be killed for talking to Congress and criminal investigators.”

Kavanagh reviewed new drug applications made to the FDA by pharmaceutical companies. He was one of the holdouts at the Agency who insisted that the drugs had to be safe and effective before being released to the public.

But honest appraisal wasn’t part of the FDA culture, and Kavanagh swam against the tide, until he realized his life and the lives of his children were on the line.

What was his secret task at the FDA? “Drug reviewers were clearly told not to question drug companies and that our job was to approve drugs.” In other words, rubber stamp them. Say the drugs were safe and effective when they were not.

Kavanagh’s revelations are stunning. He recalls a meeting where a drug-company representative flat-out stated that his company had paid the FDA for a new-drug approval. Paid for it. As in bribe.

***Kavanagh remarks that the drug pyridostigmine, given to US troops to prevent the later effects of nerve gas, “actually increased the lethality” of certain nerve agents.

Kavanagh recalls being given records of safety data on a drug—and then his bosses told him which sections not to read. Obviously, they knew the drug was dangerous and they knew exactly where, in the reports, that fact would be revealed.
—end of excerpt—
Women have to know what is waiting for them, in vials of vaccines, when they become pregnant. Waiting for them and their unborn children.

Huxley’s Brave New World portrayed a nation of docile citizens. But there, at least, the drug of choice was Soma, a compound that stimulated pleasure centers.

Here, we’re talking about docility and obedience in the face of suffering, pain, neurological damage, and death.

Doctors don’t want to know about this. They don’t want to know the true story about vaccines. If they did, they’d suddenly remember the body count they’ve been responsible for.

So instead, they polish their act, designed to invoke credibility and, above all, authority.

Invent a mountaintop, stand on it, and sell, sell, sell.

That’s their vaccine motto.

What’s yours?

Jon Rappoport

onawah

9th June 2016, 16:13

Judge finds Merck lied in patent trial, overturns $200-million verdict
http://www.latimes.com/business/hiltzik/la-fi-hiltzik-merck-gilead-20160608-snap-story.html
(red lettering my emphasis)

The public doesn’t have a very high opinion of drug manufacturers for various reasons, and now federal Judge Beth Labson Freeman of San Jose has provided another one. Finding that Merck & Co. lied to a business partner and to the court itself, Freeman this week threw out a patent infringement judgment Merck had won against Gilead Sciences, and overturned a $200-million jury award in the case.

This is a big deal, involving one of the most profitable drugs on the market today — Gilead’s blockbuster Sovaldi treatment for the hepatitis C virus — and the world’s fourth-largest drug company Merck..

Merck's misconduct includes lying..., misusing Pharmasset's confdential information..., and lying under oath at deposition and trial.
— Federal Judge Beth Labson Freeman
“This is a jaw-dropping reversal of fortune for Gilead and Merck,” concludes Randy Lilleston of BioPharmaDive. It’s also a window into the intricate dances drug companies do with each other when trying to make deals for potentially lucrative new drugs — and the perils of allowing a promising formula to fall into the wrong hands. It also places a different cast on a jury award that Merck had crowed over. In its announcement of its victory in March, the company spoke sanctimoniously about how the jury verdict “upholds patent protections that are essential to the development of new medical treatments.” Merck says it will appeal Freeman’s ruling.

Merck won the $200-million jury award in March, after accusing Gilead of infringing its patents for Sovaldi. Gilead claimed in response that the patents were invalid, but it really drew blood when it accused Merck of misconduct and the patent defense of “unclean hands.” The judge, plainly aghast at what she learned, spared no invective in lowering the boom on Merck, finding the company guilty of “numerous unconscionable acts.”

Most stemmed from Merck’s underhanded interactions with Sovaldi’s inventor, Pharmasset, which was acquired by Gilead for $11 billion. That deal proved to be a bargain, as Sovaldi and its related treatment Harvoni have brought Gilead more than $20 billion in sales since 2013. The drugs are so effective that Gilead’s stratospheric pricing for them has become Exhibit A in the national controversy over the cost of drugs.

High cost of hepatitis drug reflects a broken pricing system
High cost of hepatitis drug reflects a broken pricing system
“Merck’s misconduct includes lying to Pharmasset, misusing Pharmasset’s confidential information, breaching confidentiality and firewall agreements, and lying under oath at deposition and trial,” Freeman ruled.

Much of the judge’s ire was directed at retired Merck patent attorney Phillippe Durette, who was working on patents for antiviral drugs during a period when Merck was trying to do a deal with Pharmasset, which was developing the formulation that was then known as PSI-6130 and would eventually be marketed as Sovaldi.

As is often the case, Merck signed a nondisclosure agreement, or NDA, with Pharmasset, pledging not to use the latter’s secret information for any purpose other than to decide whether to pursue the relationship. Pharmasset turned over information including the structure of PSI-6130 to a single Merck scientist who was to be “firewalled” — that is, he couldn’t discuss it with anyone in Merck’s own drug development loop.

Here's why it's so difficult to solve soaring drug prices
Here's why it's so difficult to solve soaring drug prices
That worked until a March 2014 conference call between Merck and Pharmaasset officials regarding a possible business deal. Pharmasset was willing to reveal the structure of PSI-6130 on the call, because it was led to believe everyone on the call would be subject to the confidentiality agreement or firewalled. But it included Durette, who wasn’t firewalled and was in a position to turn what he heard into a potential goldmine for Merck.

According to Freeman, that’s what happened. Durette shouldn’t have been allowed on the call, she found, but afterward he should have been excluded from Merck’s other related patent program. Instead, he subsequently rewrote Merck’s earlier patent claims so that they would appear to apply to Pharmasset’s upcoming release of PSI-6130. In 2011, Merck even threatened Pharmasset with a patent lawsuit over the drug.

A question of timing: A lawsuit claims Gilead Sciences could have developed a less-harmful version of its HIV treatment sooner
A question of timing: A lawsuit claims Gilead Sciences could have developed a less-harmful version of its HIV treatment sooner
What irked the judge even more, she ruled, is that Durette lied about attending the conference call. In a deposition, he repeatedly denied having been on the call. He recanted from the witness stand at trial only after he was confronted with notes taken by a Pharmasset employee during the call, showing that he had participated. At that point, he pleaded a faulty memory.

Freeman didn’t buy it. “It is overwhelmingly clear...,” she ruled, “that Dr. Durette sought at every turn to create the false impression that Merck’s conduct was aboveboard.” She blamed Merck, which she said “sponsored and encouraged” his conduct, then sought to minimize its importance by attributing the fiasco to “the failed memory of a retired employee.”

But it was central to Merck’s case. Adding to the temerity of the big drugmaker, it originally sued Gilead for $2 billion before having to settle for $200 million. Now, pending appeal, it won’t get even that much for its patent claims, and its reputation for integrity will carry a value of less than zero.

I wasn't sure where to post this, but it certainly should be on the forum somewhere! $200 million isn't a big deal for Merck, no doubt, but the judgement certainly was strongly condemnatory! :clapping:

Hervé

13th June 2016, 13:20

Invisible microparticles in food can deliver vaccines, drugs (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/invisible-microparticles-in-food-can-deliver-vaccines-drugs/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Jun12 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/06/12/invisible-microparticles-in-food-can-deliver-vaccines-drugs/), 2016

Thanks to researcher Mary Baker for showing me an explosive patent application and its implications.

Before getting to the details, the overview is this: a technology exists to embed tiny invisible particles in food products, and these particles can deliver nutrients and drugs and vaccines. Apparently, the technology has existed for at least 10 years. Yet, as Baker states, when have you seen a food label that mentions such particles?

Are we to assume the technology hasn’t yet been applied? Is it operating at a stealth level? I’ll try to answer these questions in a minute. But first:

US Patent application ‘US20080044481 A1’. “Microparticles for oral delivery.” (https://www.google.com/patents/US20080044481) May 27, 2005. The inventor and assignee is listed as Mordechai Harel, who was associated with Advanced BioNutrition Corporation of Columbia, Maryland. Here are a group of quotes from the patent application. The statements leave no doubt about the wide, wide application of the technology.

“The particles described herein can be used to deliver bioactive agents (e.g., nutrients, drugs, vaccines, antibodies, and the like), bacteria (e.g., probiotic bacteria), smaller particles, or substantially any other material to the animal.”
“The particles described herein can be prepared and used as free-flowing dry powders, slurries, suspensions, and the like, and are useful for delivering to an animal a drug, a pesticide, a nutrient, a vaccine, a smaller particle, or substantially any other composition that can be contained in the particles. The particles are thus suitable for use in human food products, animal feeds (e.g., pet foods and farmed animal diets), therapeutic compositions (e.g., drugs), prophylactic compositions (e.g., vaccines, antibiotics, and probiotic bacterial preparations), and pest control products among other products.”
“A ‘particle’ is a discrete piece of a (homogeneous or heterogeneous) material having a maximum dimension not greater than 5000 micrometers.”

“Furthermore, when the microparticles are to be used as components of a food product, it can be desirable that the microparticles are not visible.”
“The particles described herein can be used to deliver substantially any chemical species, combination of chemicals, cell, or other piece of matter that can be incorporated into the particle to a component of an animal. All such items are referred to herein as ‘bioactive’ compositions, regardless of what the utility of the composition is. Bioactive compositions include, for example, pharmaceutical compositions or compounds, nutraceutical compositions or compounds, nutritional components, probiotic bacteria, bacteriophages, viruses, flavorants, fragrances, detergents or other surface-active compositions.”
“Examples of these [deliverable micro] agents include antibiotics, analgesics, vaccines, anti-inflammatory agents, antidepressants, anti-viral agents, anti-tumor agents, enzyme inhibitors, formulations containing zidovudine, proteins or peptides (such as vaccines, antibodies, antimicrobial peptides), enzymes, (e.g., amylases, proteases, lipases, pectinases, cellulases, hemicellulases, pentosanases, xylanases, and phytases), liposomes, aromatic nitro and nitroso compounds and their metabolites, HIV protease inhibitors, viruses, and steroids, hormones or other growth stimulating agents, pesticides, herbicides, germicides, biocides, algicides, rodenticides, fungicides, insecticides, antioxidants, plant and animal growth promoters, plant and animal growth inhibitors, preservatives, nutraceuticals, disinfectants, sterilization agents, catalysts, chemical reactants, fermentation agents, foods, animal feeds, food or animal feed supplements, nutrients, flavors, colors, dyes, cosmetics, drugs, vitamins, sex sterilants, fertility inhibitors, fertility promoters, air purifiers, microorganism attenuators, nucleic acids (e.g., RNA, DNA, PNA, vectors, plasmids, ribozymes, aptamers, dendrimers, and the like), antioxidants, phytochemicals, hormones, vitamins (such as vitamins A, B1, B2, B6, B12; C, D, E, and K, pantothenate, and folic acid), pro-vitamins, carotenoids, minerals (such as calcium, selenium, magnesium salts, available iron, and iron salts), microorganisms (such as bacteria, such as probiotics, lactobacilli, fungi, and yeast), prebiotics, trace elements, essential and/or highly unsaturated fatty acids (such as omega-3 fatty acids, and mid-chain triglycerides), nutritional supplements, enzymes (such as amylases, proteases, lipases, pectinases, cellulases, hemicellulases, pentosanases, xylanases, and phytases), pigments, amino acids, agriculturally useful compositions to either prevent infestation (such as herbicides, pesticides, insecticides, rodenticides, fungicides, mixtures thereof) or to promote growth (such as hormones, fertilizers, or other growth stimulating agents), flavorants, and fragrances.” I’d say that’s a wide range of application, wouldn’t you?

Did you notice, among the blizzard of compounds deliverable through invisible microparticles, the drug called zidovudine? That’s AZT, a chemo medicine used to treat AIDS patients. To say AZT is toxic would be a vast understatement. It destroys the ability of cells to replicate. And back in 2005, it was mentioned as a drug that can be delivered in food.

So is this technology being applied? Do we, in fact, have these microparticles and their bioactive components in our food?

Let’s go back to the 2005 patent application. As I mentioned, the inventor, Mordechai Harel, was associated with a company, Advanced BioNutrition Corporation. On the company’s website (http://www.advancedbionutrition.com/), we find a link to a scientific paper co-authored by Roger Drewes, who became the company’s chief science officer in 2010 (“A novel targeted delivery technology for protecting sensitive bioactive compounds…” (http://www.advancedbionutrition.com/files/ABN_Poster_Probiotics.pdf)). This is an interesting paper.

Here is some of the language in the paper. Does any of it remind you of quotes from the 2005 patent application? The paper mentions a novel and proprietary “delivery technology,” MicroMax, which “protect[s] sensitive bioactive compounds through food manufacturing processes.”

Also mentioned: a “formulation containing natural polymers surrounding the probiotic bacteria or other biologically active materials…” The probiotic bacteria “remain quiescent while retaining their activity for a long period of time under challenging…gastric conditions…[MicroMax was tested using] bacteria, essential oils, vitamins, enzymes, pigments, and even vaccines in a variety of food and feed products…and the microparticles were sieved to deliver the desired particle range…” [emphasis added]

This might help. Here is the abstract from the 2005 patent application:
“The invention provides microbeads containing oil-associated biologically active compounds and methods for their manufacture and use. The microbeads consist of a soluble complex of non-digestible polymer and emulsifier with oil-associated biologically active compounds embedded in a matrix of digestible polymer. The disclosed microbead complex protects the biologically active compounds, such as vitamins, fish oil and carotenoids, from oxidation, taste and odor degradation. The disclosed microbeads also provide protection from the stomach digestive distraction [e.g., gastric activity] and allows for the delivery of the biologically active compounds in the intestine.” [emphasis added] I think we’re looking at the same technology in the 2005 patent application and in Advanced BioNutrition Corp’s MicroMax methods—or two technologies that closely resemble each other—in which case, yes, invisible microparticles in food are much more than a proposed system. This is a working system, available now. It can deliver a stunning array of chemicals and bioactive substances to people in their food.
(Note: I have no idea what Advanced BioNutrition Corp is or isn’t delivering to its customers—but I think the company should make these facts known.)

Who knows what other companies have, and are using, this technology?

Are we looking at zero informed consent to be treated, in food, with medicines and vaccines? Zero knowledge on the part of the public? Zero accountability? Nothing on the food labels?

If this is happening to the population now, the word “stealth” only begins to describe it.

Jon Rappoport

onawah

23rd June 2016, 02:25

Mandatory vaccination bill clears hurdle in Calif.
June 21, 2016
http://healthcarepublic.info/2016/06/21/mandatory-vaccination-bill-clears-hurdle-in-calif/

SACRAMENTO, Calif. — Opponents of a proposal that would require California schoolchildren to be vaccinated vowed to continue their fight after a Senate committee overwhelmingly approved the bill Wednesday.
http://http://cbsnews2.cbsistatic.com/hub/i/r/2015/04/22/d2d974ce-88a8-446b-9992-53f2d8f88ba6/thumbnail/620x350/cc03c1f59fd930636215a0771a7202f6/vaccines-california-ap621043733265.jpgTianna Hazard, of Oakland, California, wipes tears from her eyes as she and her daughter, Livi, 9 months, leave a committee hearing where lawmakers approved a measure requiring California schoolchildren to get vaccinated at the Capitol in Sacramento April 22, 2015.

The Senate Education Committee voted 7-2 on the bill by Sen. Richard Pan, a Democratic pediatrician from Sacramento, with votes from both Democrats and Republicans.

The bill now heads to the Senate Judiciary Committee for a hearing next week as part of a long legislative process.

“We will continue to show our strength, and we will continue to educate lawmakers and the public about why this is a bad bill,” said Jean Keese, a spokeswoman for the California Coalition for Health Choice.

The proposal was among several drafted across the nation in the wake of a measles outbreak that started at Disneyland and sickened more than 100 people in the U.S. and Mexico.

It would eliminate California’s personal-belief and religious exemptions so unvaccinated children would not be able to attend public or private schools. Medical waivers would only be available for children who have health problems.

Lawmakers had delayed a vote on the bill last week after some on the Education Committee worried it would deprive unvaccinated children of an adequate education.

Pan made changes that let families that opt out of vaccines to homeschool their children together and allowing students to seek independent study.

“It’s a strong sign that people want to be sure that we protect our kids, protect our schools and protect our communities from these preventable diseases,” Pan said of Wednesday’s vote.

It's not done yet, but if they can do it in California....
It looks like there is going to have to be a huge battle to stop this.
Where I live, there is a FB group that is trying to have a screening of VAXXED locally.
I hope more communities will be doing that!

Hervé

23rd June 2016, 15:11

The vaccine matrix: covert birth control, female sterility (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/06/23/the-vaccine-matrix-covert-birth-control-female-sterility/)

by Jon Rappoport Jun23 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2016/06/23/the-vaccine-matrix-covert-birth-control-female-sterility/), 2016

“Part of the vaccine covert op involves turning humans into social constructs who can only think, in the most shallow terms, about ‘protecting the group’. Such people would lose any semblance of individuality, as well as the ability to analyze vaccines and understand what harm they do.” (The Underground, Jon Rappoport)

In the vaccine research community, it’s an open secret that the Rockefeller Fund, the UN, and other groups have been backing the development of vaccines that function as agents of population control. This work has been going on for decades.

We’re talking about inducing female sterility.

Through which vaccine? Tetanus, for example, which is given with the diphtheria and pertussis vaccines in a one-shot combination.

The combination has a number of names (and the contents of the vaccines may vary to some degree): DPT, DTP, DTwP, DTaP, Tdap. Tdap is the version currently recommended by the Centers for Disease Control (http://www.cdc.gov/vaccines/vpd-vac/tetanus/default.htm).

Note: The recently mandated vaccine bill (SB277) passed in California lists the tetanus vaccine on its schedule of shots (http://leginfo.legislature.ca.gov/faces/billTextClient.xhtml?bill_id=201520160SB277) that must be given to every public and private school child.

Here, from BBC News (13/10/2014) is a bland denial that there is a serious problem with the tetanus vaccine. “Kenya Catholic Church tetanus fears ‘unfounded’” (http://www.bbc.com/news/world-africa-29594091):
“Kenya’s government has dismissed allegations made by the country’s Catholic Church that a tetanus vaccine can cause sterility in women.”

“‘It’s a safe certified vaccine,’ Health Minister James Macharia told the BBC.”
On the other hand—
“‘The [health] ministry must stop making noise and allow the Church to sample the vaccines before they are given,’ Dr Stephen Karanja, the chair of the Catholic Doctors Association in Kenya, told the BBC. He said tetanus vaccines tested earlier in the year contained an antigen – an agent that triggers antibody production by the body’s immune system – which could cause sterility in women.”

“But Mr Macharia [Health Minister] said the vaccine had been approved by the World Health Organization and Unicef.”
Let’s dig a little deeper. In fact, a lot deeper.

Here is a blockbuster article published at lifesitenews, a month after the BBC article posted above. Written by Steve Weatherbe, it reveals, among other things, that the Kenyan government and a teacher’s union were taking the Catholic Doctors Association charges very seriously. The headline reads: “Kenyan gymt [government] launches probe into claim UN is using vaccines for ‘mass sterilization’” (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/kenyan-gvmt-launches-probe-into-claim-un-is-using-vaccines-for-mass-sterili):
“The health committee of Kenya’s National Assembly has ordered an independent inquiry into the Catholic Church’s claims that a national anti-tetanus vaccination campaign is covering for a sterilization scheme aimed at suppressing the country’s population.

“The news comes as health ministry officials have called for professional discipline against Dr. Stephen Karanja, head of Kenyan Catholic Doctors Association, who raised the alarm about the vaccine.

“At the same time, a teacher’s union has called for a boycott of the vaccination campaign until Catholic claims are disproven.

“The Health Ministry, which is conducting the five-injection, two-year vaccination project on female Kenyans aged 14-49, and the vaccine’s supplier, the World Health Organization, deny the claims of the Church, which has called all along for an independent inquiry.

“Robert Pukose, the government MP who is vice-chairman of the National Assembly’s health committee, explained, ‘We are at loss about who to believe since both sides have tabled [submitted] conflicting results. That is why we need new tests conducted jointly for us to give final and conclusive results,’ according to the Nairobi Standard.

“The inquiry will consist of submitting vaccine samples to a committee of Catholic, government, and independent medical experts. What they will be looking for are traces of HCG, a female hormone produced during pregnancy, which if injected along with traces of tetanus, will produce antibodies. And just as these antibodies will react to a real tetanus infection, so will they react to a pregnancy, causing a miscarriage.

“The Health Ministry submitted its test results on the tetanus vaccine to the committee last week, showing no trace of HCG.

“This week the Catholic bishops’ doctors presented their own test results, all of which showed traces of HCG. Karanja told the committee, ‘The hormone, Beta HCG, is neither a byproduct of, nor a component required for, the manufacture of the tetanus vaccine. It being part of the vaccine is nothing short of a scheme to forcefully render our women incapable of bearing children.’

“The Health Ministry’s Immunization Technical Group, Dr. Collins Tabu, challenged the validity of the Catholic doctors’ test results, asking, ‘Were the samples sent to the labs indeed vaccines? Were they sent in their primary containers and what was the condition of storage? What types of tests were run on them?’

“Unless the tests were done at either of two specialized government labs, they could not be valid, he added.

“But the Kenyan Catholic doctors have told LifeSiteNews via email that the government won’t let anyone get samples of the vaccine for tests—the ones used had to be obtained surreptitiously by devout Catholics. All along the doctors wanted to conduct tests jointly with the government but could not get co-operation.

“Dr. Karanja also told the committee the tests were simple and could be conducted at any lab. Dr. Pukose further undermined Tabu’s argument, noting that both the Health Ministry and the Catholics had submitted results from the Lancet Kenya lab—with contradictory findings.

“Meanwhile Akello Misori, secretary general of the Kenya Union of Post Primary Education (Kuppet), advised women to avoid the tetanus shots…

“One big reason for the Church’s concern is that the vaccines are provided by the World Health Organization and UNICEF, two United Nations organizations with a documented involvement in developing a sterilization vaccine using the HCG hormone as an antigen.

“Karanja’s colleague Dr. Wahome Ngare told LifeSiteNews, ‘WHO conducted massive vaccinations campaigns using the tetanus vaccine laced with HCG in Mexico in 1993 and Nicaragua and Philippines in 1994.’ The opposition of the Catholic Church stopped those drives. [emphasis added]

“’What is downright immoral and evil,’ said Ngare, ‘is that the tetanus laced with HCG was given as a fertility-regulating vaccine without disclosing its contraceptive effect to the girls and the mothers. As far as they were concerned, they had gone for an innocent injection to prevent neonatal tetanus.’

“…The [Kenya] National Assembly’s Dr. Pukose issued a stern warning after announcing the joint investigation, saying, ‘Those found to have been misleading Kenyans, whether it is the experts advising the Catholic Church or the Ministry of Health, will be held individually accountable. Playing with the safety and health of Kenyans is a criminal matter.’”
I have made inquiries about the final disposition of the Kenyan government inquiry, and so far I’ve received no answers. It’s possible that the government has left the matter unresolved.

Here is additional background on attempts to develop a vaccine that would cause pregnant women to miscarry.

An astonishing journal paper. November, 1993. FASEB Journal, volume 7, pp.1381-1385 (http://www.fasebj.org/content/7/14/1381.full.pdf). Authors—Stephan Dirnhofer et al. Dirnhofer was a member of the Institute for Biomedical Aging Research of the Austrian Academy of Sciences.

A quote from the paper:

“Our study provides insights into possible modes of action of the birth control vaccine promoted by the Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines of the WHO (World Health Organization).”

A birth control vaccine?

Yes.

A vaccine whose purpose is to achieve miscarriages. This particular vaccine was apparently just one of several anti-fertility vaccines the Task Force was promoting.

Yes. There is a Task Force on Birth Control Vaccines at WHO. This journal paper focuses on a hormone called human chorionic gonadotropin B (hCG). There is a heading in the FASEB paper (p.1382) called “Ability of antibodies to neutralize the biological activity of hCG.” The authors are trying to discover whether a state of non-fertility can be achieved by blocking the normal activity of hCG.

Another journal paper. The British Medical Bulletin, volume 49, 1993. “Contraceptive Vaccines.” (http://bmb.oxfordjournals.org/content/49/1/88.abstract) The authors—RJ Aitken et al. From the MRC Reproductive Biology Unit, University of Edinburgh, Edinburgh, UK.
“Three major approaches to contraceptive vaccine development are being pursued at the present time. The most advanced approach, which has already reached the stage of phase 2 clinical trials, involves the induction of immunity against human chorionic gonadotrophin (hCG). Vaccines are being engineered … incorporating tetanus or diptheria toxoid linked to a variety of hCG-based peptides … Clinical trials have revealed that such preparations are capable of stimulating the production of anti-hCG antibodies…” [emphasis added]
The authors are talking about creating an immune response against a female hormone. Training a woman’s body to react against one of its own secreted hormones. The authors state, “The fundamental principle behind this approach to contraceptive vaccine development is to prevent the maternal recognition of pregnancy by inducing a state of immunity against hGC, the hormone that signals the presence of the embryo to the maternal endocrine system.”

Stop the female body from recognizing a state of pregnancy. Get the body to treat the natural hormone hCG as an intruder, a disease agent, and mobilize the forces of the immune system against it. Create a synthetic effect, an engineered effect, by which the mother’s “maternal endocrine system” does not swing into gear when pregnancy occurs. The result? The embryo in the mother is swept away by her next period—since hGC, which signals the existence of the pregnancy and halts menstruation cycles, is now treated as a disease entity.

The authors put it this way: “In principle, the induction of immunity against hGC should lead to a sequence of normal, or slightly extended, menstrual cycles during which any pregnancies would be terminated…”

Miscarriage would then be the “normal” state of affairs. These authors leave no doubt about who the target of this vaccine would be:
“During the next decade the world’s population is set to rise by around 500 million. Moreover, because the rates of population growth in the developing countries of Africa, South America, and Asia will be so much greater than the rest of the world, the distribution of this dramatic population growth will be uneven…”
Two other vaccine methods are described. They “aim to prevent conception by interfering with the intricate cascade of interactive events that characterize the union of male and female gametes at fertilization.”

The diphtheria and tetanus vaccines would function as a social and political mask—to hide the sterilizing intent, as millions of women in the Third World would receive vaccines they’re told would protect them against infections and disease.

A letter to a medical journal, The Lancet, p.1222, Volume 339, May 16, 1992. “Cameroon: Vaccination and politics.” (http://www.thelancet.com/journals/lancet/article/PII0140-6736%2892%2991151-W/fulltext) Peter Ndumbe and Emmanuel Yenshu, the authors of this letter, report on their efforts to analyze widespread popular resistance to a tetanus vaccine given in the northwest province of Cameroon.

Two of the reasons women rejected the vaccine: it was given only to “females of childbearing age,” and people heard that a “sterilizing agent” was present in the vaccine.

The late well-known journalist, Alexander Cockburn, on the op ed page of the LA Times on September 8, 1994, in his piece “Real U.S. Policy in Third World: Sterilization : Disregard the ’empowerment’ shoe polish—the goal is to keep the natives from breeding,” (http://articles.latimes.com/1994-09-08/local/me-35791_1_shoe-polish) reviewed the infamous Kissinger-commissioned 1974 National Security Study Memorandum 200, “which addressed population issues.”
“… the true concern of Kissinger analysts [in Memorandum 200] was maintenance of US access to Third World resources. They worried that the ‘political consequences’ of population growth [in the Third World] could produce internal instability … With famine and food riots and the breakdown of social order in such countries, [the Kissinger memo warns that] ‘the smooth flow of needed materials will be jeopardized.’”
In other words, too many people equals disruption for the transnational corporations, who steal nations from those very people. Therefore, reduce the population.

Therefore, develop a vaccine that does that job.

Jon Rappoport

Hervé

27th June 2016, 12:44

Glyphosate herbicide disrupts uterine development (http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/17047)

Claire Robinson GM Watch (http://gmwatch.org/news/latest-news/17047)
Details Published: 21 June 2016

https://www.sott.net/image/s16/327568/large/Wistar_rat_and_reproductive_sy.jpg

Claire Robinson reports on a new study that indicates glyphosate herbicides may be endocrine disruptors

Glyphosate herbicide disrupts the development of the uterus of female rats when they are exposed for 7 days after birth, a new study (abstract below) by Argentine researchers shows.

The glyphosate herbicide caused cell proliferation and structural changes in the rats’ uterus. This was in spite of the fact that no signs of chronic or acute toxicity or differences in weight gain were seen in treated pups.

Glyphosate herbicide also disrupted the expression of proteins involved in uterine development.

The authors conclude that exposure to glyphosate herbicide may affect female fertility and/or promote the development of uterine cancer.

They also state that their study is the first to show endocrine-disrupting effects of a glyphosate-based herbicide on the uterus of newborn and prepubertal rats, supporting the possibility that glyphosate-based herbicides might be endocrine disruptors.

Miscarriages in GM soy-growing regions
Doctors (http://www.i-sis.org.uk/Devastating_Impacts_of_Glyphosate_Argentina.php) and scientists (http://www.urantiagaia.org/eng/vital/agrotoxico/agrotoxico_sul_america.pdf) have noted high rates of miscarriage – sometimes called “spontaneous abortion” – in women living in regions of Argentina where GM Roundup Ready soy is grown and sprayed with glyphosate herbicides. The new study may shed light on this phenomenon.

Dose found toxic in new study is claimed safe by US regulators
The dose of herbicide found to disrupt uterine development in the rats was 2 mg per kg of bodyweight per day, based on the US “reference dose” of pure glyphosate that regulators deem safe to consume every day of our lives for a lifetime.

Clearly, this study questions that assumption of safety.

But there is a complication – namely that the exposure route chosen by the researchers was injection under the skin rather than oral administration.

Oral administration is one of the exposure routes favoured by the Organisation for Economic Cooperation and Development (OECD) for toxicology tests conducted on pesticides for regulatory purposes. Exposure routes are supposed to reflect human exposure routes as closely as possible. Studies that use injection are generally dismissed by regulators as “not relevant” to human risk assessment.

However, the authors point out in their study that given the very early stage of development of the rat pups tested – they would still have been feeding from the mothers – injection was the only exposure route that would ensure incorporation of the whole substance into the rats’ bodies. This makes good scientific sense, but almost guarantees that regulators will try to ignore the study.

Oral exposure not the same as injection
Scientists whom we consulted agreed with the authors' justification for using injection, given the timing of administration. But they added that the distribution of the glyphosate herbicide in the rats’ bodies may be quite different following injection compared to the oral route – and that the toxic effects observed might therefore also be different.

One scientist advised that as only around 30% of glyphosate is taken up in the body through the usual oral route of exposure, the researchers should have injected lower amounts than the US reference dose to reflect this. Indeed, a dose-response experimental design, with additional lower doses, would have been preferable, though this would also have been more expensive. We hope this important study can be followed up along these lines.

For their part, regulators should require studies to be carried out on glyphosate herbicides at realistic doses – but also demand a phase-out of their use until and unless their safety can be established.
—
Neonatal exposure to a glyphosate based herbicide alters the development of the rat uterus
Schimpf, Marlise Guerrero, Milesi, Maria M., Ingaramo, Paola I., Luque, Enrique H., Varayoud, Jorgelina
Toxicology (2016)
http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.tox.2016.06.004

Glyphosate-based herbicides (GBHs) are extensively used to control weeds on both cropland and non-cropland areas. No reports are available regarding the effects of GBHs exposure on uterine development. We evaluated if neonatal exposure to a GBH affects uterine morphology, proliferation and expression of proteins that regulate uterine organogenetic differentiation in rats. Female Wistar pups received saline solution (control, C) or a commercial formulation of glyphosate (GBH, 2 mg/kg) by sc injection every 48 h from postnatal day (PND) 1 to PND7. Rats were sacrificed on PND8 (neonatal period) and PND21 (prepubertal period) to evaluate acute and short-term effects, respectively. The uterine morphology was evaluated in hematoxylin and eosin stained sections. The epithelial and stromal immunophenotypes were established by assessing the expression of luminal epithelial protein (cytokeratin 8; CK8), basal epithelial proteins (p63 and pan cytokeratin CK1, 5, 10 and 14); and vimentin by immunohistochemistry (IHC). To investigate changes on proteins that regulate uterine organogenetic differentiation we evaluated the expression of estrogen receptor alpha (ERα), progesterone receptor (PR), Hoxa10 and Wnt7a by IHC. The GBH-exposed uteri showed morphological changes, characterized by an increase in the incidence of luminal epithelial hyperplasia (LEH) and an increase in the stromal and myometrial thickness. The epithelial cells showed a positive immunostaining for CK8, while the stromal cells for vimentin. GBH treatment increased cell proliferation in the luminal and stromal compartment on PND8, without changes on PND21. GBH treatment also altered the expression of proteins involved in uterine organogenetic differentiation. PR and Hoxa10 were deregulated both immediately and two weeks after the exposure. ERα was induced in the stromal compartment on PND8, and was downregulated in the luminal epithelial cells of gyphosate-exposed animals on PND21. GBH treatment also increased the expression of Wnt7a in the stromal and glandular epithelial cells on PND21. Neonatal exposure to GBH disrupts the postnatal uterine development at the neonatal and prepubertal period. All these changes may alter the functional differentiation of the uterus, affecting the female fertility and/or promoting the development of neoplasias.
Related:
More bad news about GMO soy: Mother goats had altered milk & stunted kids (https://www.sott.net/article/304844-More-bad-news-about-GMO-soy-Mother-goats-had-altered-milk-stunted-kids)

The Chemical Toxin - Glyphosate drives breast cancer proliferation, study warns, as urine tests show europeans have this weed killer in their bodies (https://www.sott.net/article/263112-The-Chemical-Toxin-Glyphosate-drives-breast-cancer-proliferation-study-warns-as-urine-tests-show-europeans-have-this-weed-killer-in-their-bodies)

Research: Roundup Diluted by 450-Fold is Still Toxic to DNA (https://www.sott.net/article/241613-Research-Roundup-Diluted-by-450-Fold-is-Still-Toxic-to-DNA)

Monsanto's Infertility-Linked Roundup Found in All Urine Samples Tested (https://www.sott.net/article/240662-Monsantos-Infertility-Linked-Roundup-Found-in-All-Urine-Samples-Tested)

Scientist Says Flawed Science of GMOs Jeopardizing Future Generations (https://www.sott.net/article/243115-Scientist-Says-Flawed-Science-of-GMOs-Jeopardizing-Future-Generations)

Hervé

15th July 2016, 13:04

Angry Parents in Colombia Shut Down Schools, Lock Gates in Protest Over HPV Vaccine Injuries (http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/angry-parents-in-colombia-shut-down-schools-lock-gates-in-protest-over-hpv-vaccine-injuries/)

by Maria Teresa Gutiérrez (http://www.opinionysalud.com/padres-las-supuestas-victimas-la-vacuna-del-vph-se-tomaron-los-colegios-del-carmen-bolivar/)
OpinionySalud.com (http://www.opinionysalud.com/padres-las-supuestas-victimas-la-vacuna-del-vph-se-tomaron-los-colegios-del-carmen-bolivar/)

http://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2016/07/Angry-Parents-Colombia.jpg
Angry parents from Carmen de Bolivar Colombia closed down schools this week in protest of the HPV vaccine. Image source (http://www.opinionysalud.com/padres-las-supuestas-victimas-la-vacuna-del-vph-se-tomaron-los-colegios-del-carmen-bolivar/).

Excerpts translated from Spanish:

Today when hundreds of children of Carmen de Bolivar were to resume classes after day holiday midyear, they found their schools closed by several groups of parents of girls who are being affected after being vaccinated by the vaccine against human papilloma virus (HPV) in this Bolivarense municipality.

With banners and padlocks, parents blocked the educational institutions to demand that the government respond on more than 1,000 cases (of HPV vaccine injuries), which according to the associations of parents of Carmen de Bolivar, have been presented in this municipality.
“The girls are in crisis but neither the provincial government nor the national government give us a solution. Our daughters are still treated like they’re crazy,” said a mother who spoke with Opinion and Health and would not reveal her name.
Already two years since the outbreak of this situation in Carmen de Bolivar, today the victims say they have not received treatment, nor a coherent response (from the government.)
“We can not go on like this, without knowing …. how they can improve,” said the mother.
Read the Full Story Here (http://www.opinionysalud.com/padres-las-supuestas-victimas-la-vacuna-del-vph-se-tomaron-los-colegios-del-carmen-bolivar/).

Related:
Parents of HPV Vaccine Victims Protest in the Streets of Colombia (https://vaccineimpact.com/2015/parents-of-hpv-vaccine-victims-protest-in-the-streets-of-colombia/)

Colombian Constitutional Court Orders Official Investigation Into HPV Vaccine Injury Epidemic (http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/colombian-constitutional-court-orders-official-investigation-into-hpv-injury-epidemic/)

Children in 7th grade will be forcibly injected with HPV vaccine if they wish to remain in public school (https://www.sott.net/article/321970-Children-in-7th-grade-will-be-forcibly-injected-with-HPV-vaccine-if-they-wish-to-remain-in-public-school)

kennywally

29th July 2016, 15:37

Hervé

19th February 2017, 14:39

Suit opens in Tokyo court over cervical cancer vaccine side effects (http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/02/13/national/crime-legal/suit-opens-tokyo-court-cervical-cancer-vaccine-side-effects/#.WKlU8n9yyyL)

Mizuho Aoki
japantimes.co.jp (http://www.japantimes.co.jp/news/2017/02/13/national/crime-legal/suit-opens-tokyo-court-cervical-cancer-vaccine-side-effects/#.WKlU8n9yyyL)
Mon, 13 Feb 2017 08:19 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s18/378776/large/n_vaccine_a_20170214_870x566.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s18/378776/full/n_vaccine_a_20170214_870x566.jpg)
Plaintiffs suing the government and drugmakers over health problems allegedly caused by cervical cancer vaccines head to the Tokyo District Court on Monday for the opening of their trial © KYODO

.

Twenty-eight girls and women suffering what they say are side effects from cervical cancer vaccines that were recommended by the government demanded compensation from the state and drugmakers Monday as their trial opened at the Tokyo District Court.

The plaintiffs, ranging in age from 15 to 22, said they have experienced a wide range of health problems, including pain all over their bodies and impaired mobility, after receiving the human papillomavirus (HPV) vaccines between 2010 and 2013.

Each is demanding ¥15 million in damages.

Erina Sonoda, a 20-year-old college student, said she started to suffer strong menstrual pain after receiving the second of three recommended shots of the Cervarix vaccine, and the pain spread to other parts of her body after the third vaccination.

Due to agonizing pain, Sonoda said she has difficulty walking without a cane and often must use a wheelchair.

"I felt acute pain as if someone was squashing my internal organs. ... Such conditions have only gotten worse," Sonoda told the court while sitting in a wheelchair.

"I received the shots because the government recommended it," she said. "I want the government to take seriously its responsibility for causing us (to suffer from) such symptoms."

Since last July, a total of 119 plaintiffs have filed similar suits with courts in Tokyo, Nagoya, Osaka and Fukuoka, according to Masumi Minaguchi, a lawyer representing the women.

The government and the drugmakers — GlaxoSmithKline PLC and Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp., who make the HPV vaccines Cervarix and Gardasil, respectively — sought Monday to dismiss the compensation claims.

Representatives of the drugmakers said the safety and effectiveness of the medicines against cervical cancer have been scientifically confirmed and denied there is any link between the alleged side effects and the vaccines.

The Health, Labor and Welfare Ministry began recommending in April 2013 that girls between 12 and 16 be vaccinated for cervical cancer. But the ministry halted the recommendation two months later following reports of side effects.

According to the ministry, 2,945 people out of the 3.39 million women who had received the shots by the end of last April have reported side effects.

A causal link between the HPV vaccines and reported symptoms remains unclear, and no scientific proof has been submitted.

A nationwide survey conducted by a health ministry research team between July and December 2015 found symptoms claimed as side effects of cervical cancer vaccines in both vaccinated and unvaccinated populations.

The team is conducting further detailed analysis of the data.

Cervical cancer is the second most common cause of cancer deaths in women under 40. Each year about 10,000 women develop the disease in Japan and around 2,900 die annually, according to the National Cancer Center.

The primary cause of cervical cancer is human papillomavirus, a common infection transmitted through sexual intercourse. The cervical cancer vaccines are believed to help prevent HPV.

In December 2015, the World Health Organization issued a statement criticizing the government's decision to cease recommending the vaccine, saying that "policy decisions based on weak evidence, leading to lack of use of safe and effective vaccines, can result in real harm."

SOTT Comment: (https://www.sott.net/article/343023-Suit-opens-in-Tokyo-court-over-cervical-cancer-vaccine-side-effects) WHO should take its own advice and research more seriously, and stop recommending vaccines that are causing real harm:

It's official: HPV vaccine, the most dangerous vaccine yet (https://www.sott.net/article/340099-Its-official-HPV-vaccine-the-most-dangerous-vaccine-yet)
A study just released (http://link.springer.com/article/10.1007/s40264-016-0456-3) by a World Health Organization (WHO) monitoring centre in Sweden shows that adverse event reports received from national authorities — and these will represent only a fraction of those actually experienced — show a tendency to produce clusters of serious adverse events that include complex regional pain syndrome (https://www.ninds.nih.gov/Disorders/Patient-Caregiver-Education/Fact-Sheets/Complex-Regional-Pain-Syndrome-Fact-Sheet)(CRPS), postural orthostatic tachycardia syndrome (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC2600095/)(POTS) and chronic fatigue syndrome (https://www.nice.org.uk/guidance/cg53)(CFS) that exceeds any other vaccine.

Hervé

8th March 2017, 13:50

First, "they" create the condition for a profit... then they make more profits for "treating" said condition:

Doctor: 'pharma drug caused transgender' (http://newamericannews.com/doctor-pharma-drug-caused-transgender/#)

Paul Webber New American News (http://newamericannews.com/doctor-pharma-drug-caused-transgender/#)
Tue, 07 Mar 2017 18:42 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s19/382287/large/download_14.png (https://www.sott.net/image/s19/382287/full/download_14.png)
© 10 News

DES (diethylstilbestrol) (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Diethylstilbestrol) is a synthetic version of estrogen that was given to pregnant women from 1940 to the 1970's. It was marketed by pharma as a medication which would alleviate morning sickness and prevent miscarriages. It was a load of 50,000 times the normal amounts of estrogen. Women were told they were taking "super vitamins."

Decades later, it was shown that DES was a contributing cause to cancer in the women who took the synthetic estrogen and the children who were in utero at the time. A new movie in development called Wonder Drug (http://thewonderdrugmovie.com/) is documenting the horrific circumstances surrounding DES.
The currently proven effects of exposure include a rare vaginal cancer in DES Daughters; greater risk for breast cancer in DES Mothers; possible risk for testicular cancer in DES Sons; abnormal reproductive organs; infertility; high-risk pregnancies; and an increased risk for breast cancer in DES Daughters after age 40. There are a number of other suspected effects, including auto-immune disorders, but many of these effects are still awaiting further research. Grandchildren of the exposed may also be suffering the same fate as those directly exposed. There aren't sufficient studies to prove or disprove cancer's effects across generations so it would be difficult to understand the overall effects of these transgressions.

But one of the most interesting effects of the drug might well be in boys of mothers who took the drug. There seems to be a large occurrence of transgender, transsexual and intersex men who were subjected to the DES in utero.

Last year, a report (http://www.wtsp.com/news/health/can-a-drug-make-you-transgender/215234337)by 10 News out of Tampa, Florida, examined the links between DES and sexual identity occurrences.

Video (https://www.sott.net/article/iframewidth=640height=360style=border-width:0src=http://interactive.tegna-media.com/video/embed/embed.html?id=2202733&type=video&title=Didadrugleadtotransgender?&site=67&playerid=6918249996581&dfpid=32805352&dfpposition=Video_prestream_external%C2%A7ion=home/iframe):
"[There were these] two sides to my life. [Finally] it gave me some peace."

Feryo was assigned a male at birth. But today identifies as a transgender woman. She is one of thousands of people in America who struggled with their gender identity.

She believes a drug is the reason why.

Almost a thousand miles away, outside of Washington D.C., Dr. Dana Beyer, a transgender rights advocate who ran for the Maryland Senate, describes the drug: a hormone called Diethylstibesterol, also known at DES.

"Clearly the drug was given without understanding the awful consequences. This is the biggest medical disaster in modern medicine until the Vioxx scandal." It should be noted, today, many men take synthetic versions of testosterone which commonly have side effects. But to what extent the introduction of artificial testosterone might affect men is not well known seeing the drug is relatively new.

So often, pharma's tragedies are seen in hindsight rather than real time, which is why I note the synthetic testosterone.

The CDC now admits that DES is linked to cervical cancer, infertility and autoimmune disease.

Hervé

18th June 2017, 19:59

Researchers publish how they made the H7N9 virus more transmissable (http://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/06/scripps-scientists-publish-h7n9-virus.html)

Janet Phelan Natural Blaze (http://www.naturalblaze.com/2017/06/scripps-scientists-publish-h7n9-virus.html)
Sun, 18 Jun 2017 15:56 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s20/402348/large/h7n9_slate_1020x617.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s20/402348/full/h7n9_slate_1020x617.jpg)

In 2014, a moratorium was placed on federally funded research which involved making flu viruses more lethal. The moratorium was placed after heated debate generated by research published by a Netherlands team, headed up by Ron Fouchier. Fouchier's research had produced a strain of H5N1 which was able to go airborne (http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2014/04/10/301432633/scientists-publish-recipe-for-making-bird-flu-more-contagious), thus greatly enhancing its ability to spread. Fouchier focused on the transmission of the disease among ferrets, which are the lab stand-in for people.

Now, scientists in California have published research concerning enabling the human-to-human transmission of the bird flu virus H7N9. This virus strain is of concern to scientists as it has already infected 1500 people and killed 40% of them. H7N9 has not been known, however, to spread easily from human contact.

The article explaining the three genetic changes which need to be made to transform H7N9 into a virtual pandemic agent was published (http://journals.plos.org/plospathogens/article?id=10.1371/journal.ppat.1006390) on June 15, 2017 in the journal PLOS Pathogens.

According to Scripps biologist Jim Paulsen, as quoted in an NPR article (http://www.npr.org/sections/health-shots/2017/06/15/532925945/just-small-genetic-tweaks-to-chinese-bird-flu-virus-could-fuel-a-human-pandemic), "As scientists we're interested in how the virus works.... We're trying to just understand the virus so that we can be prepared."

The NPR article quotes Paulsen as stating he wants next to test the mutated strain on ferrets.

Reuters reported (https://www.reuters.com/article/us-health-birdflu-mutations-idUSKBN1962ID) on a number of scientists who were enthusiastic about the Scripps findings. Reuters quoted immunology expert Fiona Culley, who stated that "This study will help us to monitor the risk posed by bird flu in a more informed way, and increasing our knowledge of which changes in bird flu viruses could be potentially dangerous will be very useful in surveillance."

Reuters also quoted virologist Wendy Barclay. "These studies keep H7N9 virus high on the list of viruses we should be concerned about," she said. "The more people infected, the higher the chance that the lethal combination of mutations could occur."

Not all the scientists interviewed were happy about the research. When posed with the question of scientists making the genetic changes in the actual H7N9 virus, David Relman, a Stanford professor of microbiology and immunology, was quoted by NPR as stating, "I would be very hesitant, were they to want to do that. In fact, I would be reluctant to have them do that."

What are the chances that this research may be used for nefarious purposes?

Since 2001, the US government has poured over $100 billion dollars into what was initially called "Biodefense" but has euphemistically been renamed "Health Security." Many of these programs are dual-use; that is to say the research can be used for either protection or weaponization. Scientists argue that it is necessary to first create the weapon (in this case a pandemic agent) in order to research the cure.

However, the US's record of straightforwardness surrounding her "Biodefense" or "Health Security" programs has been abysmal. The limp-wristed investigation into the anthrax mailings of 2001, in which federal investigators neglected or refused to consider any lab but Fort Detrick as the locus for mailing the anthrax spores — which killed five and sickened over a dozen — resulted in the probable culprit at US Army's Dugway Proving Ground getting a "Get out of Jail Free" card.

It was less than two years ago when Dugway was caught sending live anthrax through the mail to labs, worldwide. Initially, it was thought that nine labs received the live anthrax. The number soon expanded and it was ultimately admitted that 575 separate (http://www.cidrap.umn.edu/news-perspective/2015/07/cdc-dod-anthrax-errors-involved-575-shipments) shipments of live anthrax had gone out in the span of a decade.

The official excuse, "We didn't know our deactivating equipment wasn't working!" was suspect, given numerous earlier reports that the equipment was faulty.

It has also come to light that the US has been leading the UN around by its virtual nose and providing false information both to the Biological Weapons Convention and also to the 1540 Committee concerning its "Biodefense" programs.

The reality is that the sort of research that delves into how to make H7N9 spread easily and efficiently among humans is the kind of research that should raise substantial alarm. According to sources in the US government, the moratorium on publishing this type of research is soon to be lifted. Shortly, anyone with two specimen vials to rub together may very well be able to surf the Web and learn how to create a worldwide plague. And in our current technocracy, with its worship of science as an inherent good, there just doesn't seem to be much concern about this.

In 1998, Secretary of State Madeleine Albright said,"Iraq is a long way from [America], but what happens there matters a great deal here. For the risk that the leaders of a rogue state will use nuclear, chemical or biological weapons against us or our allies is the greatest security threat we face. And it is a threat against which we must and will stand firm."

We never found those weapons in Iraq. In our zeal to protect ourselves from bogeymen and "rogue states," we may well have become the very threat that we feared.

Hervé

17th September 2017, 15:10

From Jim Stone (http://82.221.129.208/baaaasepaageh6.html):

FLU VACCINE PROVEN TO BE IN FACT AN ANTI FERTILITY VACCINE BY MAJOR VERIFIED SCIENTIFIC GROUP

(http://82.221.129.208/baaaasepaageh6.html)
VERY IMPORTANT VACCINE REPORT - TOP POSTED

The gist of the report is that a confirmed and accepted scientific study proved two doses of the flu shot in subsequent years boosts the rate of miscarriage of a pregnancy from the normal baseline of 14 percent to 77 percent, and that subsequent flu shots serve as booster shots to reduce fertility rates even more.

This study was buried for five full years and then surfaced.

Trolls are pissed with the report badly, and are saying I interpreted the numbers wrong. Clearly I did not. This is proven by the use of the number 1.4 in the study, to represent the baseline rate of normal non induced miscarriages (which averages 14 percent) and then using 7.7 as the number to represent the miscarriage rate after two subsequent flu shots in subsequent years.

FAR MORE DAMNINGLY, THE REPORT CLEARLY STARTS OUT WITH THE LINE:

ASSOCIATION OF SPONTANEOUS ABORTION WITH THE FLU VACCINE.
The context of that is pretty clear - the study was done to see if the flu shot was really a veiled anti fertility vaccine. They then concluded it was, but unsuccessfully tried to bury it under massive error margins, and then saying yes, it did induce abortion in their study but further study was needed to confirm it. Obviously no further study was done because it would go against agendas.

The full report is in the embedded window below, and no, I did NOT screw this up!

This study should, if properly brought to light, destroy the reputation of vaccines completely because it proves without question vaccines can be used for evil agendas, and ARE being used for evil agendas.

MAJOR REPORT: FLU VACCINE PROVEN TO BE IN FACT AN ANTI FERTILITY VACCINE BY MAJOR VERIFIED SCIENTIFIC GROUP

Two subsequent years of receiving the flu vaccine boosts miscarriage rates from a baseline of 14 percent to 77%

More than just the abstract was hidden behind a paywall, but the abstract had all the key info! The abstract proves that every time you get the flu shot after the first shot, it is only a booster shot to make the anti fertility component work even better. This study only shows what happens after two subsequent years of getting the shot.

FINAL OUTCOME: Normal miscarriage rates are 14 percent after pregnancy is confirmed (when you are not calling induced abortions miscarriages.) After ONE flu shot, a woman's chance of miscarriage increases to 37 percent. If the next year she gets another flu shot (which is obviously an anti fertility vaccine booster shot), her chances of miscarriage increase to 77 percent. The study did not go to the third year of getting the flu shot.

IMPORTANT NOTE: If you use planned parenthood's numbers which are greatly overstated and plug them into the numbers in this abstract, the miscarriage rate would have to be over 200 percent (which we all know is not possible) because Planned Parenthood calls induced abortions miscarriages. Planned Parenthood has successfully polluted the infosphere almost entirely with their B.S., but the study used the actual real miscarriage stats, which I confirmed with a little work. So if you decide to try to verify this, make sure you use clean numbers because planned parenthood has wrecked almost all data sources with fraudulent miscarriage stats.

HERE IT IS:

Association of spontaneous abortion with receipt of inactivated influenza vaccine containing H1N1pdm09 in 2010-11 and 2011-12
Vaccine, Volume 35, Issue 40, Pages 5314-5322
James G. Donahue, Burney A. Kieke, Jennifer P. King, Frank DeStefano, Maria A. Mascola, Stephanie A. Irving, T. Craig Cheetham, Jason M. Glanz, Lisa A. Jackson, Nicola P. Klein https://doi.org/10.1016/j.vaccine.2017.06.069
The original source is at ScienceDirect, HERE (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X17308666)

Abstract
Inactivated influenza vaccine is recommended in any stage of pregnancy, but evidence of safety in early pregnancy is limited, including for vaccines containing A/H1N1pdm2009 (pH1N1) antigen. We sought to determine if receipt of vaccine containing pH1N1 was associated with spontaneous abortion (SAB).

My [Jim Stone's] comment - the bolded text means that this was a study to see if the flu vaccine really was an anti fertility vaccine, hence the phrase "spontaneous abortion methods". This proves they had a reason to be suspicious, because they only did this study to see if the flu vaccine was an anti fertility vaccine, which causes spontaeous abortions.
Methods
We conducted a case-control study over two influenza seasons (2010-11, 2011-12) in the Vaccine Safety Datalink. Cases had spontaneous abortion and controls had live births or stillbirths and were matched on site, date of last menstrual period, and age. Of 919 potential cases identified using diagnosis codes, 485 were eligible and confirmed by medical record review. Exposure was defined as vaccination with inactivated influenza vaccine before the SAB date; the primary exposure window was the 1-28 days before the SAB.

My [Jim Stone's] comment - This paragraph establishes the legitimacy of the test, by stating the test conditions.
Results
The overall adjusted odds ratio (aOR) was 2.0 (95% CI, 1.1-3.6) for vaccine receipt in the 28-day exposure window; there was no association in other exposure windows. In season-specific analyses, the aOR in the 1-28 days was 3.7 (95% CI 1.4-9.4) in 2010-11 and 1.4 (95% CI 0.6-3.3) in 2011-12. The association was modified by influenza vaccination in the prior season (post hoc analysis). Among women who received pH1N1-containing vaccine in the previous influenza season, the aOR in the 1-28 days was 7.7 (95% CI 2.2-27.3); the aOR was 1.3 (95% CI 0.7-2.7) among women not vaccinated in the previous season. This effect modification was observed in each season.

My [Jim Stone's] comment - The above states the ratios of what happened between unvaccinated women and vaccinated women, with the maximum possible error swings also stated. The error swings are reported in a way that is way out of whack to leave near mentally deranged margins of error. In this case the margin allowed was 2.0, when the normal rate of miscarriage was 1.4, which represents a margin of error that allows a result more than double normal miscarriage rates to simply be called "error" to help conceal how bad the damage from the vaccines was. This fails because the damage was too much to bury even with that huge error swing allowed.

The first numbers outside of quotes - 3.7 followed by 1.4, shows 3.7 as the rate of miscarriage after vaccination in the first year (before their "error margins" were applied, and 1.4 as the baseline miscarriage rate (which is 14 percent) in unvaccinated women for the same year. For the second subsequent year of women getting the flu shot, the rate of miscarriage in vaccinated women was 7.7, and the rate of miscarriage in unvaccinated women was 1.3 (13 percent) due to small yearly variations in natural miscarriage rates
Conclusion
Spontaneous abortion was associated with influenza vaccination in the preceding 28 days. The association was significant only among women vaccinated in the previous influenza season with pH1N1-containing vaccine. This study does not and cannot establish a causal relationship between repeated influenza vaccination and spontaneous abortion, but further research is warranted

My [Jim Stone's] comment - It is clear they tried to lie here by leaving margin of errors so high that they buried the first year stats, but in the second year the damage was so much they could not hide it, no matter how they fudged the data. After showing an increase in miscarriage from 14 percent to 77 percent, they then say it is no big deal and can be ignored until further research proves the vaccine is actually a veiled anti fertility vaccine. But the numbers more than obviously speak for themselves.
This abstract was discovered by GreenMedInfo.com. Their report is very different from mine, because I saw what they were talking about, and then re-did all the confirmation my own way, in much easier to understand terms.

The problem with their report, (even though they stated the same thing in a different way) is that if anyone tries to confirm what they said, and then gets mired in a pool of Planned parenthood fact rigging bull**** which dominates the infosphere, they won't make any sense of the abstract because inserting planned parenthood's numbers into it would put the miscarriage rate after two years of flu vaccination at over 200 percent, and almost every source out there is using planned parenthood's numbers.

But Greenmedinfo found this buried abstract to begin with and should be commended for that, and may have made the mistake of not clearing up the issue of planned parenthood fact rigging because they know planned parenthood has obscured the real miscarriage stats badly and as a result never got ensnared by them and then had to filter fact from bull****. You can read their report HERE (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/devastating-flu-vaccine-miscarriage-study-sparks-ridiculous-spin) Their report is well worth reading also, because it goes into the politics of the issue, and my report was a basic fact check.

SO MY [Jim Stone's]FINAL NUMBERS: The flu vaccine, after two subsequent years, boosts the miscarriage rate to 77 percent, which is a 592 percent increase over normal. Green Med Info came up with a final answer of a 640 percent increase. The difference is negligible. Two decent sites looked at the same abstract and reached the same conclusion.

OBVIOUS ANSWER:

There is no way the flu vaccine is anything but an anti fertility vaccine, and I'd bet the kids who do get through pregnancy after their mom takes the jab have a hugely higher autism stat.
The original abstract is at ScienceDirect, HERE (http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0264410X17308666) USE IT EVERY TIME A VACCINE TROLL SAYS YOU CANT HANDLE SCIENCE. That is the control mechanism they use - to call you ignorant. This will shut them up!

Hym

17th September 2017, 18:19

I also see the connection with the use in early pregnancy, many years ago, with Thalidomide and the it's effect on the increase in gender cross over of children subjected, in utero, to the assault the drug had on their developing glandular systems.

The following commentary is, I hope, a necessary one on the many negative affects of the chemical/pharma industries' influence on the politicians who serve them and how this loss of empowerment, upon our rights to control those things affecting our health, should be understood and changed. (Maybe there should be another thread delving into the subject. There are threads here covering some of these topics...)

In truth, the soul walks side by side with these physical developments in the gestational periods and reacts to these unnatural attacks in deep ways that few understand. These survival mechanisms, imprinted for life, dominate the psyche of the survivor and are rarely understood by them as causative factors in their perceptions and reactions to the lives they live. I have found it quite odd that many are so prejudiced in their interactions with those who have a differing gender identity than their own. Maybe understanding gestational influences, beyond the damned lies inherent in the dishonesty of "political correctness" will awaken some to be compassionate with others, and ultimately within themselves.

As I have known of these factors for decades, it has been difficult for me to do anything but listen to those isolated and harassed gay and transgender people I've met over the years. Mentioning the influence of a chemical attack in their development during their mother's pregnancy with them would have been intrusive and often taken as an insult to their basic right to be who they feel they should be, so I have never brought it up. The science I knew was always there may not be of any comfort to them, but it is their right to know all of the truth.

However, what does that do now? We all, at many times in our lives, see deeper into those things that we had no choice in but should have. This dialog and the science that tells us the undeniable fact of these chemical influences upon the fetus, especially upon gender tendencies, and may give those affected some strength and help us in preventing these attacks on others and their children. Why is it called gender "assignment"? Is it really a choice when the chemicals affect the glandular system and the mind so dramatically? All I do know is that it is a right for the affected to choose their own way.

In case it is not understood by many out there, try to comprehend the many levels of struggle that those with identities outside of any social norm carry daily. Maybe being informed about the influence of the institutional, negative chemical assaults so many have suffered will afford a level of compassion that should have been there in the first place, what with so many living in countries claiming to be peaceful protectors of human rights. All the while, I do abhor the constant injection in the programmed entrainment industries and media, selling an agenda of pseudo-multi-gender stereotypes upon viewers and an influential, growing, adolescent population. Promotion of an agenda, created by a darkness, is not equality.

Knowing the full spectrum of the planned and inhumane manipulation of the bio-chemical nature of our bodies should outrage anyone. Arming ourselves with the science to back up the details of these criminal and immoral attacks upon us and our children is a necessary bridge across the river of lies that industry, academia, media and politicians have colluded to impose upon us. It defines them and challenges us to act in defense to the offense upon our very humanity.

Keep going. There's a lot more where that came from.

And, Thanks Herve.

Many Thanks !!!!!

Hervé

18th September 2017, 15:55

From Jim Stone (http://82.221.129.208/baaaasepaageh6.html):

Due to complete censorship, 500 trojan links, and trollage in the inbox, I'm taking this to the max. (http://82.221.129.208/baaaasepaageh6.html)

Anti fertility vaccines are old news now. " First they came for the Africans, and I did not speak up because I was _____. Then they came for the Mexicans and I was too busy to care. Then they came for the filipinos, Asian indians, and I had a BarBq to attend. And then I was sterile because they came for me at the local piggly wiggly pharmacy, and CNN did not say jack, and I am 35 and will never have kids because I waited "until later" and this damn shot won't wear off until my clock has completely ticked out.

The topic of anti fertility vaccines is so established it is easy to find stuff like this:

Anti fertility vaccines containing both progesterone and Human Chorionic Gonadotropin have been around and known about since the 80's, and from the beginning it was known that it was the WHO and the U.N. doing it.

Early broad scale releases of these vaccines went to Iran and Latin America. This is a super old topic of mine, if people think "hard proof" was found for the first time recently in Kenya, they are new to the topic, this has been going on with HARD PROOF for THREE full decades. Take a look at this Pub Med release dated July 14 1987. New topic? NOT HARDLY! This Pub Med report dated 1987 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2445212)proves the anti fertility vaccine is NOT just an "internet conspiracy" and has been around a LONG TIME.

A potential anti-pregnancy vaccine built by conjugation of the beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin to adjuvant-active muramyl peptide.

Schutze MP1, LeClerc C, Jolivet M, Deriaud E, Audibert F, Chang CC, Chedid L. Author information

Abstract

The beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) conjugated to tetanus toxoid is being investigated as a vaccine for human fertility control. Initial clinical trials indicated that the level of antibody response induced by such an immunogen was not always sufficient to prevent pregnancy. Therefore, efforts are being made to evaluate new carriers for the beta-subunit and to select adjuvants to yield a more efficient vaccine. In the present report, we demonstrate that conjugates of the beta-subunit of hCG with muramyl dipeptide (MDP), or its nonpyrogenic derivative murabutide, may have potential as an effective antipregnancy vaccine. The copolymer of beta hCG and MDP administered with Al(OH)3 to mice induced a high anti-beta hCG response, better than that induced by the conjugate of beta hCG to tetanus toxoid given with Al(OH)3. Moreover, the antibodies induced by such an immunogen were competent for neutralizing the biological activity of hCG in vivo. Even more interesting, a copolymer of beta hCG and of murabutide induced high levels of biologically active antibodies. This immunogen may represent a promising candidate for the development of an efficient vaccine for human fertility control.
Here are more PubMed links. I'll find a few of these before continuing on to how such vaccines were used to sterilize women via vaccination campaigns that never said what they were really for.

DNA used to enhance sterility after vaccination (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/25917014)
Another reference to anti fertility vaccines (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21501278)
This link talks about various methods of inducing sterility via vaccination (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21481058)
This link proves an 80 percent effective anti fertility vaccine was developed before 2011. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21272600)
This link proves women who have been nailed by one of these vaccines won't notice a thing. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19854518)
Here is a cute anti fertility vaccine proposal that uses a unique mechanism of action. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16996662)

HERE IS A GOOD ONE - THIS IS WHAT THE FLU SHOT USES (read the flu shot abstract and figure it out,) this is a connection you have to draw by yourself because they sure as * are not going to tell it to you straight up. (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16129939)

HERE IS ANOTHER GREAT ONE, dated 2004 - "The possibility of using a subunit or fragment of human chorionic gonadotropin (hCG) as an immunogen for birth control has been actively explored for many years. This proves it was an old topic in 2004! (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/16108489)
Here is the original study, that proves they had success with anti fertility vaccines in 1976.

This is the basis of the tetanus vaccine they used to sterilize many third world women. The current flu shot sterilization methods are far more advanced, and were developed in 2005 (see links above). Here is the abstract for the original effort, dated 1976 (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/813223)

Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1976 Jan;73(1):218-22. Isoimmunization against human chorionic gonadotropin with conjugates of processed beta-subunit of the hormone and tetanus toxoid. Talwar GP, Sharma NC, Dubey SK, Salahuddin M, Das C, Ramakrishnan S, Kumar S, Hingorani V.

Abstract

The immunogenicity of the conjugate prepared from "processed" beta-subunit of human chorionic gonadotropin (choriogonadotropin, HCG) and tetanus toxoid has been studied in animals and a human subject. The conjugate elicited the formation of high-affinity (Ka = 10(9)-10(11) M-1) anti-HCG and anti-tetanus antibodies. On primary immunization, the antibody, response lasted for several months. Repeat injection of the conjugate in the declining phase of antibody titers produced a booster response without a lag period. The antibodies reacted with the beta-subunit of HCG and the complete HCG molecule but were devois of significant crossreactivity with human growth hormone, placental lactogen, follicle-stimulating hormone, thyroid-stimulating hormone, and luteinizing hormone at tonic and surge levels. The antibodies were competent for neutralizing the biological activity of HCG in the mouse uterine weight gain assay, the ventral prostate weight gain assay, and the radioligand assay for binding of 125I-labeled HCG to receptors on corpus luteum. HCG (5000 international units) administered to an immunized subject was completely bound by circulating antibodies. Administration of HCG (in contrast to conjugate) was without booster effect on anti-HCG titers.
My comment: This is the vaccine that was used to sterilize third world women. To give it maximum effectiveness, three shots were given (above it says only one, without the boosters, wore off after "several months" but booster shots made it last longer - history has proven out the boosters caused it to sterilize women for 15 years.

I know we have these perverts BUSTED with this, they are using the flu shot to sterilize American women now. Why keep this tech in the third world? They have proven they can get away with nailing American women with this too, (thanks to a scamming MSM that won't report it, so why not! The following covers this VERY WELL.IT CANNOT GET ANY SIMPLER THAN THIS:

http://82.221.129.208/pages/3c.PNG

The natural miscarriage rate is between 13 and 14 percent every year. This is confirmed outside of this study. No matter how anyone trolls this (and it is getting heavily trolled everywhere, even when others post about the same topic the same way I did without reposting what is here, I mean separate independent reports,) the 7.7 number represents a 77 percent miscarriage rate after two subsequent flu shots.

After the first flu shot, the miscarriage rate jumps to 37 percent, after the second it jumps to 77 percent which proves the flu shot is in fact an anti fertility vaccine, and anti fertility vaccines need more than one dose to become highly effective. They are always administered as an initial dose and two or more subsequent boosters. This correlation of increase between subsequent flu shots fits the profile exactly for historic incidents of administration of clandestine anti fertility shots in nations other than America. (https://duckduckgo.com/?q=anti+fertility+vaccine+mexico&t=hb&ia=web)

There is no difference between the flu shot given in America which is now a proven veiled anti fertility vaccine, and the tetanus shots which were also revealed as anti fertility vaccines administered to women in the Phillipines, Africa, and Mexico. It is the same old story in America now, and the new vector the elite are using is the flu shot. Folks, it can't get any simpler than this, READ IT AND BE AWARE:

Vaccine eugenics trolls are ALL OVER THIS. They have to protect their weapon from the light of public scrutiny at all cost, clearly they expected this report to stay buried deep on page 49,355 and never expected it to see the light of day. On top of it, the report was done by pro vaxxers who for whatever reason produced the real numbers and then ignored them, instead burying them under unbelievably wide error margins. It stayed buried for five years until someone shed light on it.

Hervé

18th September 2017, 16:21

Looking back into the origins of an Agenda 21 and similars, one can start to make some sense as to what the whole picture looks like:

Was WW2 a Genocidal War on Germany? (https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/09/genocidal-jewish-war-against.html)

Henry Makow September 17, 2017

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/germany-must-perish.jpg
(Mainstream (((media))) endorsed sterilization of 48 million Germans before any Jewish mass murders took place.)

Does the focus on the Jewish holocaust obscure the fact that World War Two
may have been a genocidal war on Germany by the Illuminati central bankers?

It seems farfetched but, if we consider thatAngela Merkel is pursuing a genocidal migrant policy today, this "revisionist" interpretation may have merit.

I present six excerpts that support the view that the Illuminati had a long-term policy of exterminating Germans, which has been extended to white nations in general.

-------------------------------------

1) Theodore N. Kaufman, the author of Germany Must Perish, (http://ihr.org/books/kaufman/perish.shtml) was a Manhattan-born Jewish businessman who was also chairman of a group that called itself the "American Federation for Peace." The first edition of this slim volume was published in early 1941. The United States was still officially neutral, that is, before the Pearl Harbor attack of December 7, 1941, that brought the U.S. openly into World War II.

Kaufman's fervent proposal for the systematic sterilization of the entire German population was given respectful attention in the American press, including reviews in a number of newspapers. A review in the weekly Time magazine, March 24, 1941, called Kaufman's plan a "sensational idea."

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/175px-Bundesarchiv_Bild_102-17049%2C_Joseph_Goebbels_spricht.jpg
Germany's propaganda chief, Joseph Goebbels, seized with delight on the book. "This Jew [Kaufman] has done a disservice to the enemy," Goebbels privately commented. "If he had composed the book at my behest he couldn't have done a better job."

At his direction, the German press played up Kaufman's call for genocide. A front-page article about the book in the Berlin daily Der Angriff, July 23, 1941, appeared under headlines that called it a "Diabolical Plan for the Extermination of the German People" and a work of "Old Testament Hatred." Extracts also appeared, for example, in the nationally-circulated weekly paper Das Reich, August 3, 1941.

(More examples at link):
"There remains but one mode of ridding the world forever of Germanism (https://20thcenturytruth.wordpress.com/germany-must-perish/) -- and that is to stem the source from which issue those war-lusted souls, by preventing the people of Germany from ever again reproducing their kind. This modern method, known to science as Eugenic Sterilization, is at once practical, humane and thorough. Sterilization has become a byword of science, as the best means of ridding the human race of its misfits: the degenerate, the insane, the hereditary criminal [.......]When one realizes that such health measures as vaccination and serum treatments are considered as direct benefits to the community, certainly sterilization of the German people cannot but be considered a great health measure promoted by humanity to immunize itself forever against the virus of Germanism."

"The population of Germany, excluding conquered and annexed territories, is about 70,000,000 almost equally divided between male and female. To achieve the purpose of German extinction it would be necessary to only sterilize some 48,000,000 -- a figure which excludes, because of their limited power to procreate, males over 60 years of age, and females over 45."

-------------------------------------

2. The Hooton Plan -- A plan similar to Kaufman's was issued during the war years by a prominent American anthropologist. In an article headlined "Breed War Strain Out of Germans" in the New York daily newspaper P.M., January 4, 1943, Ernest Hooton laid out an "outbreeding" plan that would "destroy German nationalism and aggressive ideology while retaining and perpetuating desirable German biological and sociological capacities." (See also: Benjamin Colby, ‘Twas a Famous Victory, 1974, p. 131.)

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/hotton.jpg

The Harvard University professor's proposal called for genetically transforming the German nation by encouraging mating of German women with non-German men, (http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/11/government-funded-website-teaches-migrants-how-to-have-sex/)who would be brought into the country in large numbers, and of German men, forcibly held outside of Germany, with non-German women. Ten to twelve million German men would be assigned to forced labor under Allied supervision in countries outside of Germany to rebuild their economies. "The objects of this measure," wrote Dr. Hooton, "include reduction of the birthrate of 'pure' Germans, neutralization of German aggressiveness by outbreeding and denationalization of indoctrinated individuals."

This plan, Hooton estimated, would require at least 20 years to be implemented. "During this period," he went on, "encourage also the immigration and settlement in the German states of non-German nationals, especially males."

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/mixed-sex.jpg
(German government instructs migrants in miscegenation (http://www.breitbart.com/london/2016/03/11/government-funded-website-teaches-migrants-how-to-have-sex/))

In the decades since the end of World War II, something of the spirit of the genocidal Kaufman and Hooton plans seems manifest in Germany's population and immigration policies. Since the nation's defeat in 1945, the German birth rate has fallen to below the replacement level, millions of racially and culturally alien migrants have been welcomed as settlers in Germany, the number of children of mixed ethnicity has sharply increased, and the ethnic-cultural character of much of the country has been drastically altered, especially in the larger cities.

-------------------------------------

3. The Morganthau Plan (https://irvingbooks.com/xcart/product.php?productid=17532) - In the summer of 1944 the Jewish U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry R. Morgenthau, Jr. and Jewish Assistant Secretary Harry Dexter White,a Soviet agent, devised the Morgenthau Plan, more formally known as the Treasury Plan for the Treatment of Germany...If adopted, the Morgenthau Plan would have led to the death by starvation and pestilence of ten million Germans in the first two years after the war ended, in addition to the one million who had perished in the saturation bombing and the three million killed in the enforced expulsion from Germany's eastern territories. Both Roosevelt and Churchill unthinkingly initialed the Plan, as these documents show.

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/merkel-bnai-brith.jpg
(Angela Merkel with her B'nai B'rith handlers, making Masonic sign)

Stated in its simplest terms, the objective of the Morgenthau Plan (http://www.ihr.org/jhr/v09/v09p287_kubek.html) was to de-industrialize Germany and diminish its people to a pastoral existence once the war was won. If this could be accomplished, the militaristic Germans would never rise again to threaten the peace of the world. This was the justification for all the planning, but another motive lurked behind the obvious one. The hidden motive was unmasked in a syndicated column in the New York Herald Tribune in September 1946, more than a year after the collapse of the Germans. The real goal of the proposed condemnation of "all of Germany to a permanent diet of potatoes" was the communization of the defeated nation. "The best way for the German people to be driven into the arms of the Soviet Union," it was pointed out, "was for the United States to stand forth as the champion of indiscriminate and harsh misery in Germany."

-------------------------------------

4. The Genocidal Terror Bombing of German cities (https://www.henrymakow.com/2017/09/A%20major%20awkwardness%20concerning%20Churchill%27s%20conduct%20of%20the%20war%20lies%20in%20the%20 secret%20British%20policy%20of%20so-called%20%27area%20bombing%27,%20adopted%20early%20in%201942%20and%20outlined%20by%20%28Lord%29%20CP %20Snow%20in%20the%201960%20Godkin%20Lectures%20at%20Harvard%20University%20%28published%20in%20his% 20book%20Science%20and%20Government,%20Oxford%20University%20Press%201961%29.%20Snow%20had%20an%20in sider%27s%20view%20of%20the%20development%20of%20this%20policy.%20He%20outlines%20how%20the%20sinist er%20Professor%20FA%20Lindemann%20%28later%20to%20become%20Lord%20Cherwell,%20Churchill%27s%20chief% 20scientific%20adviser%29,%20persuaded%20the%20British%20Cabinet%20to%20adopt%20the%20policy%20of%20 directing%20bombing%20campaigns%20primarily%20against%20German%20working-class%20housing.%20%27Middle-class%20houses%20have%20too%20much%20space%20around%20them,%20and%20so%20are%20bound%20to%20waste%20 bombs;%20factories%20and%20%22military%20objectives%22%20had%20long%20since%20been%20forgotten,%20ex cept%20in%20official%20bulletins,%20since%20they%20were%20much%20too%20difficult%20to%20find%20and%2 0hit%27%20%28p%2048%29.%20Snow%20asks,%20%27What%20will%20people%20of%20the%20future%20think%20of%20 us?%20Will%20they%20say..%20we%20were%20wolves%20with%20the%20minds%20of%20men?%20Will%20they%20thin k%20that%20we%20had%20resigned%20our%20humanity?%20They%20will%20have%20the%20right.%27%20%28p%2049% 29.%20Fortunately,%20Snow%20needn%27t%20have%20worried.%20There%20have%20been%20and%20remain%20such% 20powerful%20vested%20interests%20committed%20to%20preserving%20the%20myths%20of%20World%20War%20II% 20that%20even%20the%20history%20departments%20of%20universities%20have%20in%20most%20cases%20assiste d%20with%20the%20cover-up.http://rense.com/general81/germm.htm) which killed between 500,000 and three million civilians depending on the source.

"A major awkwardness concerning Churchill's conduct of the war lies in the secret British policy of so-called 'area bombing', adopted early in 1942 and outlined by (Lord) CP Snow in the 1960 Godkin Lectures at Harvard University (published in his book Science and Government, Oxford University Press 1961). Snow had an insider's view of the development of this policy. He outlines how the sinister Professor FA Lindemann (later to become Lord Cherwell, Churchill's chief scientific adviser), persuaded the British Cabinet to adopt the policy of directing bombing campaigns primarily against German working-class housing. 'Middle-class houses have too much space around them, and so are bound to waste bombs; factories and "military objectives" had long since been forgotten, except in official bulletins, since they were much too difficult to find and hit' (p 48). Snow asks, 'What will people of the future think of us? Will they say.. we were wolves with the minds of men? Will they think that we had resigned our humanity? They will have the right.' (p 49). Fortunately, Snow needn't have worried. There have been and remain such powerful vested interests committed to preserving the myths of World War II that even the history departments of universities have in most cases assisted with the cover-up. [David Irving says Bomber Harris told him Dresden took place on Churchill's insistence.]

-------------------------------------

5. The rape of over two million German women (http://blogs.lse.ac.uk/lsereviewofbooks/2017/05/09/book-review-crimes-unspoken-the-rape-of-german-women-at-the-end-of-the-second-world-war-by-miriam-gebhardt/) by Soviet troops after the war. See also Hellstorm-The Real Genocide of Germany. (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=FUt-yxJODxI)

Eisenhower intentionally caused the deaths of a million German prisoners of war (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Other_Losses) after the war. An estimated million more (https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/German_prisoners_of_war_in_the_Soviet_Union)died in Russian captivity.

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/CR.jpg

6. The (https://www.henrymakow.com/2015/06/The-Illuminati-Jewish-Plan-for-European-Genocide%20.html)Coudenhove-Kalergi Plan (https://www.henrymakow.com/2015/06/The-Illuminati-Jewish-Plan-for-European-Genocide%20.html)--

Conclusion
This genocidal Masonic Jewish war against Germans has been expanded to include white nations in general. (https://www.darkmoon.me/2015/quotations-in-support-of-white-genocide/)

----------------------------------------

Related:
Genocidal statements against Jews by Germans (https://www.phdn.org/archives/www.ess.uwe.ac.uk/genocide/statements.htm)

The long-term Illuminati Jewish Plan for White Genocide (https://www.henrymakow.com/the_book_the_bankers_made_disa.html)

I recommend Europa-- Final Battle (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IcH00ZC3Df0) for the German perspective on WW2. Exposes the Allied leaders for the Communist swine they were. Tends to whitewash Nazis and deny Hitler was false opposition. He must have known UK and USSR were run by same people who funded him.

Makow--- World War One- First Christian Holocaust (https://www.henrymakow.com/downton_abbey.html)

------------------------------------------------------

First Comment by Scott:
Another component of this program, which has been expanded to other nations is the de-industrialization. Over the last several decades, manufacturing facilities from the U.S., Canada, Europe and likely Australia and New Zealand have been relocated to 3rd World nations. This was accomplished through excessive taxes and lawsuits against these companies, who were re-routed to Mexico, China, etc or closed up shop completely..

The lure of cheaper labor was the incentive not the cause. In addition, 3rd World immigration has been brought into the same (mostly) Caucasian countries. So, while it's true that the propaganda is eager to proclaim "strength in diversity" and express glee at < 50% white population by 2050, there are other benefits to TPTB.

The 3rd World immigrants are more difficult to assimilate with too many differences in ethnicity, language, religion, etc. (the people won't unite!). They're used to poverty, it drives down wages with excessive unskilled labor and makes voters more likely to require social services and become loyal constituents for liberal parties. This occurs all the while the white middle class is reduced and eliminated.

Hervé

22nd September 2017, 13:12

Study finds fetal deaths up 58 percent since Flint water crisis (https://www.rt.com/usa/404149-flint-fetal-deaths-birth-rate/)

RT (https://www.rt.com/usa/404149-flint-fetal-deaths-birth-rate/)
Fri, 22 Sep 2017 08:42 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s21/420899/large/59c42ba9fc7e93fa468b4567.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s21/420899/full/59c42ba9fc7e93fa468b4567.jpg)
© West Coast Surfer / Global Look Press

The Flint water crisis has caused fetal deaths to jump 58 percent, while birth rates in the area have dropped 12 percent, a new study suggests.

The study (http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/kanwpaper/201703.htm) by assistant economics professors David Slusky at Kansas University and Daniel Grossman at West Virginia University examined local and state health records, comparing Flint to the rest of Michigan between 2008 and 2015.

FLINT WATER CRISIS
April 2014 was when the city of Flint switched its water supply from the Detroit Water and Sewerage Department (DWSD) to Flint River in a money-saving effort.

Officials failed to treat the water, causing dangerous levels of bacteria and the pipes to corrode, many of which are made from lead. Cases of Legionnaire's Disease also increased in the area at this time, with 12 people dying as a result.

Lead exposure can cause brain damage in children, who are at risk of developmental delays, lower IQ and behavioural issues. It can damage a fetus's development and can cause (https://www.cdc.gov/nceh/lead/tips/pregnant.htm) miscarriages and stillbirths. Fertility can also be affected.

BIRTH RATES
The study examined birth rates and found, "Flint's numbers fell off a cliff, and the rest of the cities stayed pretty much constant," Slusky told (https://www.usatoday.com/story/news/nation-now/2017/09/21/fewer-pregnancies-more-fetal-deaths-flint-after-lead-levels-rose/687874001/) the Detroit Free Press.

The study looked at women of childbearing age and the number of births to calculate each city's birth rates.

Researchers also looked at Google search data to see if the drop was due to Flint residents' fear of conceiving because of the risks the water posed, but found no increase in searches on lead and lead poisoning until September 2015, when officials finally admitted there was an issue.

"During most of our time period, when the city and state officials were saying there was no problem, we didn't see any evidence of knowledge about lead in the water," Slusky said.

Officials had denied there was a problem once people began to complain, and the admission only came after a local pediatrician's research revealed rising lead levels in Flint children.

The water supply was changed in October 2015, months after the Environmental Protection Agency and Virginia Tech researchers altered them to the problem.

"We find no evidence of avoidance behavior," Slusky said (https://news.ku.edu/2017/09/15/flint-water-crisis-led-lower-fertility-rates-higher-fetal-death-rates-researchers-find). "Either Flint residents were unable to conceive children, or women were having more miscarriages during this time."

FETAL DEATHS
The study found fetal deaths increased by 58 percent in Flint since April 2014. The available state statistics only cover deaths after 20 weeks and which take place in hospitals, so the available data is limited.

"This represents a couple hundred fewer children born that otherwise would have been," Slusky told (https://news.ku.edu/2017/09/15/flint-water-crisis-led-lower-fertility-rates-higher-fetal-death-rates-researchers-find) Kansas University Today.

Babies born since the switch was made were close to 150 grams lighter, and gained less weight. They were also born half a week earlier.

The study found a slightly higher ratio of female births after the crisis. Male fetuses are more fragile, according (https://www.livescience.com/574-survival-fetus-males-rough.html) to other studies.

The statistics are similar to those found in a study (http://pubs.acs.org/doi/abs/10.1021/es4034952) by Marc Edwards of Virginia Tech on fetal deaths and birth rates in Washington D.C after residents were exposed to lead in drinking water from 2000-2004.

The study (http://econpapers.repec.org/paper/kanwpaper/201703.htm), published as part of the Kansas University Economics Department Working Papers Series in Theoretical and Applied Economics, is not yet peer reviewed.

Hervé

15th November 2017, 18:08

Bye, bye humanity? Pesticides implicated in human infertility? (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/15/pesticide-exposure-linked-to-infertility.aspx)

Dr. Mercola mercola.com (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/15/pesticide-exposure-linked-to-infertility.aspx)
Wed, 15 Nov 2017 15:43 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s21/432130/large/n_INFERTILITY_628x314.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s21/432130/full/n_INFERTILITY_628x314.jpg)
© Zave Smith/Getty

Human fertility is declining, and recent studies suggest conventional food may be a significant contributor to this disturbing trend, seen in both men and women. Pesticides have repeatedly been implicated in worsening fertility, and one of the most recent studies adds further support to this hypothesis.

The study,1,2 published in JAMA Internal Medicine, evaluated the influence of factors known to affect reproduction on the reproductive success of 325 women between the ages of 18 and 45 (mean age 35), who underwent in vitro fertilization (IVF). As reported by Time,3"The women in the study filled out detailed questionnaires about their diet, along with other factors that can affect IVF outcomes, like their age, weight and history of pregnancy and live births."

High Pesticide Exposure Associated With Reduced IVF Success
Using a U.S. government database listing average pesticide residues on food, the researchers estimated each participant's pesticide exposure based on their food questionnaires. On average, women with high pesticide exposure (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/04/29/pesticide-exposure.aspx) ate 2.3 servings per day of fruits, berries or vegetables known to have high amounts of pesticide residue. Those in the lowest quartile ate less than 1 serving of high-pesticide produce per day.

Compared to women with the lowest pesticide exposure, women with the highest amounts of pesticide exposure had an 18 percent lower IVF success rate. They were also 26 percent less likely to have a live birth if they did become pregnant. Using modeling, the researchers estimate that exchanging a single serving of high-pesticide produce per day for one with low pesticide load may increase the odds of pregnancy by 79 percent, and the odds of having a live birth by 88 percent.

Pesticide Regulations Fail to Protect Human Health
Senior investigator Dr. Jorge Chavarro, associate professor of nutrition and epidemiology at Harvard T. H. Chan School of Public Health told Time:4
"I was always skeptical that pesticide residues in foods would have any impact on health whatsoever. So, when we started doing this work a couple of years ago, I thought we were not going to find anything. I was surprised to see anything as far as health outcomes are concerned. I am now more willing to buy organic apples than I was a few months ago." Coauthor Dr. Yu-Han Chiu, research fellow in the department of nutrition at the Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, added:5
"There have been concerns for some time that exposure to low doses of pesticides through diet, such as those that we observed in this study, may have adverse health effects, especially in susceptible populations such as pregnant women and their fetus, and on children. Our study provides evidence that this concern is not unwarranted." As noted by Dr. Philip Landrigan, dean for global health and professor at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai, in an accompanying commentary,6 "The observations made in this study send a warning that our current laissez-faire attitude toward the regulation of pesticides is failing us," adding:
"We can no longer afford to assume that new pesticides are harmless until they are definitively proven to cause injury to human health. We need to overcome the strident objections of the pesticide manufacturing industry, recognize the hidden costs of deregulation, and strengthen requirements for both premarket testing of new pesticides, as well as postmarketing surveillance of exposed populations - exactly as we do for another class of potent, biologically active molecules - drugs." Male Fertility Rates Have Also Plunged
Research also shows sperm concentration and quality has dramatically declined in recent decades, and the evidence suggests endocrine disrupting chemicals are largely to blame. While there are many sources, pesticides, including glyphosate,7 are known endocrine disruptors as well. According to the first of two recently published papers,8 a meta-analysis of 185 studies and the largest of its kind, sperm counts around the world declined by more than 50 percent between 1973 and 2013, and continue to dwindle.

The most significant declines were found in samples from men in North America, Europe, Australia and New Zealand. (Men suspected of infertility, such as those attending IVF clinics, were excluded from the study.) Overall, men in these countries had a 52.4 percent decline in sperm concentration and a 59.3 percent decline in total sperm count (sperm concentration multiplied by the total volume of an ejaculate).

As it stands, half of the men in most developed nations are now near or at the point of being infertile. Lead author Dr. Hagai Levine, who called the results "profound" and "shocking,"9 worries that human extinction is a very real possibility, should the trend continue unabated.10

Microwave Exposure - Another Invisible Contributor to Infertility

qvw0YnLdzps
Exposure to electromagnetic fields (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2011/07/09/vickie-warren-on-effects-of-electromagnetic-fields.aspx) (EMFs) is another major contributor to infertility. In fact, I believe this may be the most significant factor for the observed decrease in male sperm count. Women's reproductive organs are a bit more shielded, but can still be affected, just not as easily as men's testicles.11 During World War II, it was well-known that radar operators could easily create sterility by exposing the groin to radar waves. Radar is microwave radiation and was the precursor to cellphones that use similar frequencies.

More modern research also suggests microwave radiation may play a significant role in male reproductive health. While evaluating studies showing you can radically reduce biological microwave damage using calcium channel blockers, Martin Pall, Ph.D., discovered a previously unknown mechanism of biological harm from microwaves emitted by cellphones and other wireless technologies.12

Embedded in your cell membranes are voltage gated calcium channels (VGCCs). It turns out these VGCCs are activated by microwaves, and when that happens, about 1 million calcium ions per second are released.

This massive excess of intracellular calcium then stimulates the release of nitric oxide (NO) inside your cell and mitochondria, which combines with superoxide to form peroxynitrite. Not only does peroxynitrites cause oxidative damage, they also create hydroxyl free radicals - the most destructive free radicals known to man.

Hydroxyl free radicals decimate mitochondrial and nuclear DNA, their membranes and proteins, resulting in mitochondrial dysfunction (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/01/24/how-mitochondria-influences-health.aspx). During a 2013 children's health expert panel on cellphone and Wi-Fi exposures,13 it was noted, "The testicular barrier, that protects sperm, is the most sensitive of tissues in the body ... Besides sperm count and function, the mitochondrial DNA of sperm are damaged three times more if exposed to cellphone radiation."

In addition to male testes, the tissues with the highest density of VGCCs are your brain and the pacemaker in your heart. What the research tells us is that excessive microwave exposure can be a direct contributor to conditions such as infertility, Alzheimer's, anxiety (https://articles.mercola.com/anxiety.aspx), depression (https://articles.mercola.com/depression.aspx), autism (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2013/04/02/autism-rates.aspx) and cardiac arrhythmias (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2016/07/25/magnesium-for-heart-health.aspx).14

Indeed, other studies have linked low-level electromagnetic radiation exposure from cellphones to an 8 percent reduction in sperm motility (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/07/22/cell-phone-radiation-sperm-count.aspx) and a 9 percent reduction in sperm viability.15,16 Wi-Fi equipped laptop computers have also been linked to decreased sperm motility and an increase in sperm DNA fragmentation after just four hours of use.17 So, if you care about your reproductive health, the most important strategies to implement are to:

Avoid carrying your cellphone in your pockets or on your hip
Avoid using portable computers and tablets on your lap
Turn off your cellphones at night, as even if you are not talking they can damage you up to 30 feet away
Turn off your Wi-Fi at night (ideally in the day also)
Most importantly, turn off the electricity to your bedroom at the circuit breaker. This typically works for most bedrooms unless you have a room or rooms adjacent to your bedroom, in which case you might need to shut that off too. This will radically lower electric and magnetic fields while you sleep. If you need a clock you can you a battery operated one and even better a talking clock with no light that can be picked up on Amazon

Study Reveals Shocking Increase in Glyphosate Levels
In related news, researchers from University of California San Diego School of Medicine recently reported there's been a shocking increase in glyphosate exposure in recent decades and, subsequently, the level found in people's urine.

For this study,18 the researchers measured excretion levels of glyphosate and its metabolite aminomethylphosphonic acid in 100 participants from the Rancho Bernardo Study of Healthy Aging, which ran for 23 years, starting in 1993, the year before genetically engineered (GE) crops were introduced in the U.S.

As one would expect, the introduction of Roundup Ready GE crops led to a massive increase in the use of Roundup, the active ingredient of which is glyphosate. Glyphosate (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/10/29/glyphosate-in-foods-and-population.aspx) has also become a popular tool for desiccating non-GE grains, legumes and beans.

Data19,20 reveals that between 1974 (the year glyphosate entered the U.S. market and just over two decades before GE crops were introduced) and 2014, glyphosate use in the U.S. increased more than 250-fold. Globally, glyphosate use rose nearly fifteenfold since 1996, two years after the first GE crops hit the market.

At the start of the study, very few of the participants had detectable levels of glyphosate in their urine, but by 2016, 70 percent of them did.21 Overall, the prevalence of human exposure to glyphosate increased by 500 percent during the study period (1993 to 2016), while actual levels of the chemical in people's bodies increased by an astounding 1,208 percent.

Rising Glyphosate Levels in Urine Is Cause for Concern
The exact implications of glyphosate exposure to human health is still unclear, but other recent research22 found that daily exposure to ultra-low levels of glyphosate for two years led to nonalcoholic fatty liver disease (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/01/24/what-does-roundup-do-to-liver.aspx) in rats, and the levels found in people's urine were a hundredfold greater than those in this rat study.

In response to the findings of rising glyphosate levels in people's urine, Monsanto was quick to say that the amounts reported "do not raise health concerns," and that the fact that the chemical is detected in urine is just "one way our bodies get rid of nonessential substances."23 Speaking to GM Watch, Michael Antoniou of King's College London had another take on the matter:24
"This is the first study to longitudinally track urine levels of glyphosate over a period before and after the introduction of GM glyphosate-tolerant crops. It is yet another example illustrating that the vast majority of present-day Americans have readily detectable levels of glyphosate in their urine, ranging from 0.3 parts per billion, as in this study, to 10 times higher - 3 or more parts per billion - detected by others.
These results are worrying because there is increasing evidence to show that exposure to glyphosate-based herbicides below regulatory safety limits can be harmful." Glyphosate Found in Breast Milk
Three years ago, the first-ever independent testing for glyphosate in the breast milk (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/04/22/glyphosate-herbicide.aspx) of American women found high levels in 30 percent of the samples.25 The testing, which was not a formal scientific study, was carried out by Moms Across America and Sustainable Pulse. Still, the findings strongly suggest glyphosate bioaccumulates and builds up in your body over time, despite claims to the contrary.

Breast milk levels were found to be 76 to 166 micrograms per liter (ug/l), which is up to 1,600 times higher than the European Drinking Water Directive allows for individual pesticides, but still well below the 700 ug/l maximum contaminant level (MCL) for glyphosate allowed in the U.S. However, the U.S. level was set by the U.S. Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) based on the now-ridiculous premise that glyphosate will not bioaccumulate.

Importantly, many of the participants in this study were familiar with genetically modified organisms (GMOs) and had been actively trying to avoid them for several months to two years. This makes the findings all the more disheartening, and shows just how difficult it is to avoid this chemical unless you're consistently eating an organic diet.

Corporate Machinations Kept Glyphosate on the Market
As noted in a recent investigation by In These Times,26 in the wake of Moms Across America's findings, Monsanto defended its flagship pesticide with a study that found no glyphosate in breast milk. However, this study, which was purported to be "independent," was actually backed by Monsanto. According to In These Times:
"More and more research suggests that glyphosate exposure can lead to numerous health issues, ranging from non-Hodgkin lymphoma and kidney damage to disruption of gut bacteria and improper hormone functioning. The Moms Across America episode fits a pattern that has emerged since 1974, when the EPA first registered glyphosate for use:
When questions have been raised about the chemical's safety, Monsanto has ensured that the answers serve its financial interests, rather than scientific accuracy and transparency. Our two-year investigation found incontrovertible evidence that Monsanto has exerted deep influence over EPA decisions since glyphosate first came on the market - via Roundup - more than 40 years ago." Manipulation of Science Led to Underestimation of Glyphosate's Risks
Suspiciously, archived EPA documents from decades ago, when the agency was initially considering glyphosate for approval, have been heavily redacted. Despite much of it being illegible, the documents reveal that EPA scientists were greatly concerned about a 1983 mouse study showing that glyphosate caused cancer. The documentation also shows that their interpretation of the data was "subsequently reversed by EPA upper management and advisory boards, apparently under pressure from Monsanto."
"In years to come, that pivotal 1983 mouse study would be buried under layers of misleading analysis to obscure its meaning. Today, the EPA and Monsanto continue to cite that study as evidence that glyphosate poses no public health risk, even though the study's actual evidence indicates otherwise," In These Times reports. The EPA has also been accused of overlooking other evidence of harm. I wrote about this in "Unveiling the Glyphosate Conspiracy (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/05/10/glyphosate-conspiracy.aspx)." As mentioned earlier, glyphosate was introduced in 1974, and the earliest example of Monsanto's attempts to downplay evidence of harm dates back to May 1973, the year before its ultimate approval.

At the time, a biologist at the EPA's Toxicology Branch Registration Division recommended including the word "Danger" on the label, due to the chemical's ability to cause eye irritation. Monsanto strongly objected, saying the eye irritation observed was merely the result of "a secondary infection in previously irritated eyes." After three years of deliberations back and forth, the EPA finally agreed to Monsanto's request to replace the word "Danger" with the less attention-grabbing "Caution."

How to Check Your Glyphosate Level
As food has become increasingly adulterated, contaminated and genetically engineered, the need for laboratory testing has exponentially grown. In response to this need, the Health Research Institute (HRI Labs) has created two glyphosate tests for the public - a water testing kit (http://shop.mercola.com/product/2058/1/glyphosate-water-test-kit), and an environmental exposure test kit (http://shop.mercola.com/product/2057/1/glyphosate-environmental-exposure-test-kit).

The latter is a urine test that will tell you how much glyphosate you have in your system, which can give you a good idea of the purity of your diet. If your glyphosate level is high, chances are you've been exposed to many other agrochemicals as well.

I had the environmental exposure test done a while back, and had a glyphosate level below the threshold of detection, which is 40 parts per trillion, likely because I eat primarily organic and homegrown foods, and expel toxins I might come in contact with through exercise and regular sauna (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2014/05/04/detoxification-program.aspx) use.

So far, HRI Labs has analyzed more than 1,200 urine samples. The testing is being done as part of a research project, which will provide valuable information about the presence of glyphosate in the diet. It will also help answer questions about how lifestyle and location affects people's exposure to agrochemicals. Here are some of their findings to date:

76 percent of people tested have some level of glyphosate in their system
Men typically have higher levels than women
People who eat oats on a regular basis have twice as much glyphosate in their system as people who don't (likely because oats are desiccated with glyphosate before harvest)
People who eat organic food on a regular basis have an 80 percent lower level of glyphosate than those who rarely eat organic. This indicates organic products are a safer choice
People who eat five or more servings of vegetables per day have glyphosate levels that are 50 percent lower than those who don't eat fewer vegetables

Which Foods Are the Most Important to Buy Organic?

uvoPWXOPV0E

Everyone can be harmed by pesticides, but if you're a man or woman of childbearing age or have young children, taking steps to reduce your exposure is especially important. Ideally, all of the food you and your family eat would be organic. That said, not everyone has access to a wide variety of organic produce, and it can sometimes be costlier than buying conventional.

One way to save some money while still lowering your pesticide exposure is to purchase certain organic items, and "settling" for others that are conventionally grown, based on how heavily each given crop is typically treated with pesticides.

Animal products, like meat, butter, milk and eggs are the most important to buy organic, since animal products tend to bioaccumulate toxins from their pesticide-laced feed, concentrating them to far higher concentrations than are typically present in vegetables. Beyond animal foods, the pesticide load of different fruits and vegetables can vary greatly.

In 2015, Consumer Reports analyzed 12 years' worth of data from the USDA's Pesticide Data Program to determine the risk categories (from very low to very high) for different types of produce.27 Their results are featured in the video above. Because children are especially vulnerable to the effects of environmental chemicals, including pesticides, they based the risk assessment on a 3.5-year-old child.

They recommend buying organic for any produce that came back in the medium or higher risk categories, which left the following foods as examples of those you should always try to buy organic, due to their elevated pesticide load. Another excellent source, which is updated annually, is the Environmental Working Group's (EWG) "Dirty Dozen" and "Clean 15" lists of produce with the greatest and least amounts of pesticide contamination. The EWG's 2017 shopper's guide28 to pesticides in produce can be downloaded here (https://www.ewg.org/foodnews/#.WgCau7aZMo8).

Peaches
Carrots
Strawberries
Green Beans
Sweet Bell Peppers
Hot Peppers
Tangerines
Nectarines
Cranberries
Sweet Potatoes

How to Clean Pesticides Off Your Produce
Washing your produce will help remove surface pesticide residues. According to recent research,29 the most effective cleaning method, by far, is to wash your produce using a mixture of tap water and baking soda. Soaking apples in a 1 percent baking soda solution for 12 to 15 minutes was found to remove 80 percent of the fungicide thiabendazole and 96 percent of the insecticide phosmet.

The reason thiabendazole was not as effectively removed is because it penetrated the apple to a depth of 80 micrometers. Importantly, the industry standard for cleaning apples - running under tap water or treating with the bleach solution for two minutes - was ineffective in comparison.

Sources and references here (https://articles.mercola.com/sites/articles/archive/2017/11/15/pesticide-exposure-linked-to-infertility.aspx).

Related:
Why men should never put their cell phone in their pocket: Study shows prolonged exposure to radiation destroys sperm (https://www.sott.net/article/327965-Why-men-should-never-put-their-cell-phone-in-their-pocket-Study-shows-prolonged-exposure-to-radiation-destroys-sperm)

Is your urine Roundup ready? The majority of tests come back positive (https://www.sott.net/article/325003-Is-your-urine-Roundup-ready-The-majority-of-tests-come-back-positive)

Michelle Marie

15th November 2017, 18:43

It is my powerful intention that all souls who have taken part in the genocide and infertility on planet earth be held accountable according to Universal Law. Anyone who is a part of the WHO, the UN, the pharma industries, and the medical establishment is responsible and accountable NOW.
(Please share this intention.)

I'm am thankful for the AWARENESS provided that shines the light of truth on these issues. I commend the Warriors of light for researching and sharing this information.

36474

It is my intention to unite with others who share the intention that the exposure of this truth, and the intention of accountability, will put an end to theses nefarious activities. I'm saying "No!" with my whole Soul-Spirit and I know Universal Law will be upheld.

Thank you for the information on this thread. It's good to be aware.🌻

MM

Hervé

28th November 2017, 13:40

Here is the best indicator that vaccines are designed by western nefarious agendas:

Want vaccine truth? Now you’re a Russian dupe. I’m serious. (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/want-vaccine-truth-now-youre-a-russian-dupe-im-serious/)

by Jon Rappoport (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/author/jonrappoport/) Nov 27 (https://jonrappoport.wordpress.com/2017/11/27/want-vaccine-truth-now-youre-a-russian-dupe-im-serious/), 2017

It had to happen. In the UK, warnings are going out that “anti-vaccination” posts online are the work of Russian disinformation agents who are trying to destabilize the West.

OK, I confess. For the past 30 years, during which I’ve exposed lies about vaccines from top to bottom, I’ve been working for the Kremlin. My code name is Ivan the Giant Killer.

The ibtimes has the story (http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/uk-health-officials-fear-russian-cyber-units-are-spreading-false-information-flu-measles-jabs-1648981):
“UK health officials fear Russian cyber units are ‘spreading false information’ on flu and measles jabs”.

“Concerns have prompted UK government departments to monitor social media and flag false stories.”

“Experts are warning that Russian cyber units are spreading false information about flu and measles jabs in the UK.”

“In an apparent attempt to erode trust in US and European governments, state-sponsored units are using social media to spread lies, the Mirror reported. The Kremlin is believed to be attempting to foster distrust over flu jabs and the MMR measles vaccines.”

“The former National Counter Terrorism Security Office head Chris Phillips warned that Russian cyber farms are a threat to daily life. ‘This is all about destabilisation by external forces. War is ever changing and becoming much more cyber-based,’ Phillips told The Mirror.”

“He added: ‘If the Russian government, or whoever, wishes to exert this kind of influence, is able to cause difficulty in decisions, in trusting the government of the day in that country, or otherwise trusted media and news organisations, then so much the better for them’.”

“According to the Mirror, concerns over the threat to public health and security are so high that government departments have been ordered to monitor social media and flag any troublesome articles.”

“Health chiefs have reportedly held emergency meetings concerning the spread of ‘fake news’ about vaccination campaigns. There are also concerns that the strides made through information programmes in schools and communities could be undone by these false stories.”

“Public Health England and the Royal College of GPs have expressed concern over how much false health news is shared online and on social media.”
ERODE PUBLIC TRUST IN GOVERNMENT AND MAINSTREAM MEDIA? Excuse me, but those institutions have been doing a marvelous job destroying public trust all on their own.

And they think you’re complete morons; they think you’ll buy the idea that anti-vaccination information must be false and fake and coming out of Russia.

They think you’ll support censoring that information.
“OK, boys, today we’re going to merge the ‘Russia-did-it’ meme with the ‘beware-of-unofficial-vaccine-disinformation’ meme, roll it all up into a ball and push it out there. We’ve got to do something. More people are waking up to vaccine damage and the preposterous nature of our claims that vaccines are wonderfully safe and effective. We know our claims are bull****, but we’re supposed to know. They’re not supposed to. But more of them do know.”
Coming up next:
“Let’s see. During the presidential campaign, [U]Trump suggested that vaccines could cause autism (https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H1JFGWBAC5c). Obviously, he got that information from…Russia. More proof he’s an agent working for Putin.”
The Amish are all Russians.

That soccer mom down the street with the kid who pretends he’s super-healthy and has never been vaccinated? She has a secret transmitter in her basement. Every night she taps out signals to her handler in Moscow, using marked pages from Tolstoy’s War and Peace for code. Quick, report her to the FBI. Call the shock troops from Merck and Glaxo.

Jon Rappoport

onawah

18th December 2017, 19:44

What the Gardasil Testing May Have Missed

There’s no evidence that the HPV vaccine causes serious harm, but an investigation shows the trials weren’t designed to properly assess safety.
DEC. 17, 2017 MEDICAL EXAMINER COVER STORY By Frederik Joelving

https://slate.com/health-and-science/2017/12/flaws-in-the-clinical-trials-for-gardasil-made-it-harder-to-properly-assess-safety.html
(Read a companion piece from Slate’s science editor on this investigation here: https://slate.com/health-and-science/2017/12/why-slate-is-questioning-gardasil.html )

In their final report recommending conditional approval of Gardasil 9, the EMA rapporteurs asked the drugmaker to “discuss the impact of [its] unconventional and potentially suboptimal method of reporting adverse events and provide reassurance on the overall completeness and accuracy of safety data provided in the application.” Läkemedelsverket refused to share the company’s response. In the EMA’s public assessment of Gardasil 9, all mention of the safety concerns has been scrubbed.

Valerie Villars

18th December 2017, 20:38

Short story about vaccines. I worked at the Tulane National Primate Research Center, where we were required to get t.b. tests every year, as t.b. could wipe out the primate colony in short order. So far, so good (yes, NOW I know I shouldn't have). However, they offered flu shots every year for free. It was my first year there and I didn't know then what I know now.

The shots were not supposed to be live. I got my vaccine, went home at 4 PM, felt strangely sleepy and went to sleep on the couch. I awoke hours later so sick I thought I was going to die. I literally thought I was dying and I am not a weenie. All I could think about was that my poor father would find my dead body on the couch. I felt like I had the worst raging case of the flu ever and I was too weak to even pick up the phone to call 911.

Somehow, I summoned the will and called my sister who came over with some Advil. This seemed to knock it out of me and I went to work the next day and told the nurse my reaction. She advised I call the CDC to report the horrific symptoms. The CDC told me almost dying was normal. I never got another vaccine in my life.

Hervé

17th May 2018, 13:30

PROVEN: Gardasil triggers the immune system to attack a woman's brain. (http://82.221.129.208/.yv8.html)

Jim Stone May 17, 2018 (http://82.221.129.208/.yv8.html)

To be more specific, if you study this abstract, Gardasil in fact causes a woman's immune system to attack her brain the same way antidepressants do.

My belief: Gardasil is in fact given to women for the sole purpose of destroying male/female relationships. Not my belief, COLD HARD FACT: Gardasil definitely, without question, attacks the brain, and the end result is depression. An abstract could not possibly make it more clear than this, and no, vaccine trolls won't refer to this "science" while they ridicule all people who question vaccines as "too stupid to understand basic science". When they do that, all I do is troll them hard with science that is over their heads. Not difficult to do against those who were only handed lines to throw out while not understanding a thing about what they are actually trolling. Here's a great one to throw against a troll:

http://82.221.129.208/gardasilimmune.JPG

If the state ever mandates I be vaccinated, at least one person other than me will suffer brain damage of a type you won't get from a vaccine in whatever attempt is made to jab me. I won't go down easy.

They know damn well what they are doing with vaccines, so when I go after trolls I hit them from the eugenics angle and explain the science behind why and how the vaccines do what they do. After they blat back a few textbook responses, they give up, I have yet to lose that debate.

Here is how vaccines are designed to destroy people, in one short little blurb:

No matter what you put in a vaccine along with a pathogen, the immune system will identify it as the pathogen, and will produce a custom antibody for whatever was injected along with the pathogen. If it happens to be peanut oil, a peanut allergy will result. If the pathogen happens to be injected with a squalene adjuvant, you might end up with a fish allergy. and today, many vaccines are grown in human tissue. They can't get all the human tissue separated from the pathogens, (nor do they even want to) and this is what is causing multiple sclerosis, fibromyalgia, autism, and a whole slew of other ailments at levels we have never seen before.

Squalene is a common vaccine adjuvant. Squalene is a basic building block of the human nervous system. What then happens when the immune system is tricked into removing this basic building block from the human body wherever it is? A whole slew of neurodegenerative auto immune disorders, and THEY KNOW IT. And it is worse than this now, nowadays a lot of the vaccines are cultured in genetically engineered yeast, that is designed to produce whatever human materials they actually want the resulting vaccine to attack. It can be whatever they want, whatever they tell the yeast to mimic. That makes modern vaccines a PERFECT weapon.

To sum it up, here is the science behind sabotaged vaccines: Materials are intentionally placed in the vaccine along with whatever pathogen the vaccine is for, and these materials are tailored to cause the immune system to identify key building blocks of the body (usually in the nervous system) as hostile, and the immune system subsequently rips the body and brain to shreds.

That is the "science". And no vaccine troll has ever been able to respond to it.

Hervé

20th May 2018, 18:20

Japanese victims of forced sterilization file three more lawsuits over inhumane eugenics law (https://www.rt.com/news/427059-japan-forced-sterilization-lawsuits/)

RT (https://www.rt.com/news/427059-japan-forced-sterilization-lawsuits/)
Sun, 20 May 2018 17:12 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/468530/large/5afe1ef5dda4c85a2c8b45ca.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/468530/full/5afe1ef5dda4c85a2c8b45ca.jpg)
© Kiyoshi Ota / Reuters

Three Japanese pensioners have filed separate lawsuits against the government over irreversible damage caused by forced sterilization conducted under Japan's eugenics law, which was in place for almost 50 years.

Faced with life-long hardship, three Japanese citizens in their 70s filed lawsuits on Thursday, seeking total compensation of 80 million yen ($720,000) for being forcefully sterilized under a 1948 Eugenics Protection Law that was designed to "prevent the birth of poor-quality descendants."

The trio, two men and a woman, are among at least 16,500 people who were forced to give up their right to procreate. Another 8,500 underwent the same controversial procedures, but with their own "consent" - arguably after being forced to do so under societal pressure. Decades later, they are now seeking justice before district courts in Tokyo, Sendai and Sapporo.

"I had the secret in myself that I could not confide to my dearest wife for more than 40 years, until just before she passed away by marrow leukemia. It was about the fact that I had a vasectomy in 1957 and became unable to have a child," one of the victims, using the pseudonym Saburo Kita, told a press conference on Thursday after filing the lawsuit in Tokyo.

"I can't imagine how hurt my wife was whenever she was asked by people around her why she 'still hasn't had a child,'" Kita said, noting that he "made one woman unhappy."

As dozens gathered outside the court to protest against the government's forced sterilization program that was in place until 1996, Kita urged other victims of the eugenics law to come out and sue the government. He is seeking 30 million yen ($270,000) in compensation. The other two victims who filed lawsuits against the government on Thursday elsewhere in Japan are seeking similar damages. They have not addressed the public.

VWyI6Kv25Ig

In January, a woman in Miyagi Prefecture became the first to initiate a lawsuit against the Japanese government, seeking 11 million yen ($99,000) in compensation for her forced sterilization when she was 15-years old.

While the government previously refused to compensate victims, arguing that sterilization was legal at the time, lawmakers pledged in March to consider paying out for restitution, promising to debate a bill on the issue next year.

Hervé

9th July 2018, 16:18

The readers familiar with the theory outlined in "Silent Weapons for Quiet wars" (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?53442-Now-that-the-distractions-of-predicted-catastrophes-have-come-and-gone-what-s-left&p=605099&viewfull=1#post605099) won't have much difficulties in applying the "electronic" flow model to the following which will start to make sense:

The Shortage of Humans (https://www.henrymakow.com/2018/07/the-human-shortage.html)

henrymakow.com July 9, 2018

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/angola-top-ten-countries-with-highest-birth-rates.jpg

9 of the 10 countries with the top birthrate are in Africa (http://www.countrydetail.com/top-10-countries-highest-birth-rates-world/).

After decades of toxic feminist (homosexual) propaganda and policies, much of the world is facing a demographic crisis. We cannot replenish our populations without im-migration. Spanish blogger Felix Rodrigo Mora shows how, with the exception of Africa, human reservoirs are drying up. This puts the migrant crisis in a different perspective while underlining the necessity to increase European fertility.

The Demographic Crisis & Solution (https://esfuerzoyservicio.blogspot.com/2018/06/la-crisis-demografica-y-la-solucion.html)
by Felix Rodrigo Mora (http://felixrodrigomora.net/)
(Excerpt by henrymakow.com)

Spain has the lowest birthrate in the world, 1.3 per woman, even behind the very senile and aged Japan, which is at 1.4. Thus it advocates immigration as a solution...

What nobody is talking about, the labor-supplying countries are becoming demographically exhausted as well. They have an aging and elderly population condemned to live miserably, to die prematurely and frighteningly due to the emigration of their young people. Let's examine some creepy cases.

Romania is today, together with Morocco and China, the main provider of neo-servile labor to Spain. The Spanish economy works thanks to the workers contributed by these three countries.

What is happening in Romania? In 1992 it had 23 million inhabitants but in 2017 it had fallen to 19 million; that is, in 25 years it has lost 4 million, 17% of its population! In 2017, it had 79,000 births and 109,000 deaths. The number of children per woman is 1.38, substantially insufficient because it is far from the minimum necessary, 2.1. This is a consequence of emigration, which leads young people out and leaves the elderly so that more of the population is over 65 than the under 14, an indicator of the liquidation of the country. To put it bluntly: Romania is in a spiral of self-destruction and destruction. Emigration is annihilating it. Young people are missing to care for the elderly. And to produce basic goods at affordable prices. And to give continuity to Romanian culture, history, idiosyncrasy and language. Therefore, with Romania, a silent genocide is being committed, that "our" fascist scoundrels justify and promote.

MOROCCO
Moroccan emigration to Europe is a genocidal and exterminationist act, which leads to the annihilation of the peoples of Morocco. The data is conclusive and frightening. If in 1960 the number of children per woman in Morocco was 8.4, the figure had dropped to 4 in 1990 and to 2.1 in 2014 ... That is why the Moroccan government declared that year that their country had entered a stage of " no generational renewal ".

So many young people have left that Morocco is today a pathetic place of villages where there are only old people. Elderly and old women await a premature and atrocious death, without caregivers and affections, all so that the opulent bourgeois of the North have cheap labor in their fruit plantations, in their agriculture Hyper-quimizada under plastic, in their princely villas, in the vile construction business, etc.

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/Birth-Rate-2010-2015-World-Map.jpg

The peoples of Morocco, who suffered Spanish (1860-1956) and French colonialism, and who fought bravely against it (remember the great hero of that epic struggle, Abd el-Krim), have the right to existence and continuity, to not be annihilated, to a future as a people. That is why they must rise in revolution against the new colonialism of the emigration to Europe, which is much more aggressive and annihilating than the old colonialism.

Neither Romania nor Morocco can contribute much more labor to the North. These terrifying breeding farms of human beings for export are exhausted, overexploited, depleted. The surrounding countries, especially Algeria and Tunisia, which suffer a similar demographic situation. Only Egypt maintains, for the moment, a slightly more spirited birth-rate.

CHINA
China knows similar circumstances. The communist party implemented the policy of only one child in 1979, to put an end to "the population explosion". The results have been shocking. In 35 years, the population has aged and there are not enough workers, while there are about 300 million retirees, many with no or little family assistance.

In 2015, the fascist regime has abolished the 1979 regulations allowing families to have two children, but that is not working and will not work because the social, economic and political structures of the country. The Communist despots are considering forcing females to have two children! With 1.6 children per woman, China is sliding towards economic disaster and the death of hundreds of millions of people ue to lack of care.

https://www.henrymakow.com/upload_images/mali-top-ten-countries-with-highest-birth-rates.jpg
(Mali has the 2nd highest birthrate in the world)

Thus, those countries who at the moment are our three main suppliers of neo-serfs are exhausted by population. They will still be able to send a few hundred thousand workers but less and less, and in a period of ten years hardly anything. Moreover, China is already taking measures to import sub-Saharan labor, and Morocco will have to do the same, so that in its march towards Europe from the center and south of Africa there will be workers who settle in that country, with which there will be less and more expensive for Europe, for Spain.

The progressive shortage of "human capital" at the global level is manifested in a conclusive fact, that migrants arriving in the EU have progressively higher ages, which indicates that there are fewer and fewer young people in their places of origin.

Twenty-five years ago they came to us from Ecuador and the Dominican Republic, but that already happens very scarcely, since the first one is at 2.5 children per woman, compared to 6.7 in 1960, and the second at 2.4, when in 1960 achieved 7.6 children per female.

As a result, today there is not enough exportable labor, neo-serfs, to send to the North. The few that still exist in the countries of Latin America begin to consider marching to Brazil, a potentially rich country that is suffering a demographic catastrophe, with 1.7 children per woman when in 1960 it enjoyed 6.1.

The emergence of world powers and regional powers (such as Brazil) in need of labor is a very recent phenomenon but one that will increase in the coming years, which makes the supply of labor on the global level will be increasingly weak while increasing demand, which will lead to a situation with fewer available migrants, and those with higher economic demands. That situation is terrifying for a country as super-aged as Spain. Indeed, if all the analysts make the most funereal forecasts for China, which still has 1.6 children per woman, what can be said for our case, with 1.3?..

That's right, from that date, 20/25 years, hundreds of millions of people, if not billions, will probably suffer a terrible old age and a premature and horrible death. The greatest genocide in the history of mankind is underway. It is responsible for those who have established an anti-natalist biopolitics, in its many manifestations.

----

Thanks to Oscar for this tip!

Related:
How to defuse a demographic time bomb in Africa (https://intmassmedia.com/2017/08/09/how-to-defuse-a-demographic-bomb-in-africa/)

Immigrants Can't Solve Europe's Demographic Crisis (https://www.lifesitenews.com/opinion/will-they-cure-europes-demographic-sickness-or-just-temporarily-alleviate-t)

onawah

9th July 2018, 17:55

No doubt this is also a contributing factor in the race for more automation, robots, AI etc. (also by design...).

That's right, from that date, 20/25 years, hundreds of millions of people, if not billions, will probably suffer a terrible old age and a premature and horrible death. The greatest genocide in the history of mankind is underway. It is responsible for those who have established an anti-natalist biopolitics, in its many manifestations.

Hervé

11th July 2018, 13:44

All in the name of "helping"...

Cross-posting from (here) (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?p=1234781#post1234781)

The sordid history of infant formula and how the USA bullies, blackmails and threatens 3rd world countries (https://www.greanvillepost.com/2018/07/10/the-sordid-history-of-infant-formula-the-usas-attempt-to-bully-blackmail-threaten-3rd-world-countries/)

R.S. Ahthion The Greanville Post (https://www.greanvillepost.com/2018/07/10/the-sordid-history-of-infant-formula-the-usas-attempt-to-bully-blackmail-threaten-3rd-world-countries/)
Tue, 10 Jul 2018 00:01 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s23/477744/large/babyKiller_scandal.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s23/477744/full/babyKiller_scandal.jpg)

The 1974 article titled The Baby Killer blew the lid off the Nestle bottle formula scandal. (1) (http://archive.babymilkaction.org/pdfs/babykiller.pdf) Companies like Nestle used women in nurses uniforms to sell their baby formula. They provided free samples to mothers who would use the formula. These women would then find their breasts had stopped giving milk after a month of using the infant formula. Now they were hooked and needed to pay for the formula yet the family income in many cases was only $7 a week. What unfolded was a tragedy: from mixing the baby water with unsafe water sources to not being able to afford the expensive baby formula and diluting it to make it last longer. The result was deaths of babies in the millions, malnourished babies with stunted growth condemned to a lifetime of physical and mental disability.

A stunning example of free-market murder feeding the world's children to a $11.5 billion industry.

A million infant deaths a year are blamed on a reliance of infant formula rather than breastfeeding. (2) (https://www.nytimes.com/1981/12/06/magazine/the-controversy-over-infant-formula.html?pagewanted=all)

The recent attempt by the United States to overturn 40 years of World Health Organisation consensus that breast feeding is universally better for babies is a prime example of the desperation of United States capital and how entwined corporate interest has become within the government.

American officials first sought to water down the resolution by removing language that called on governments to "protect, promote and support breast-feeding". When that failed they resorted to threats of trade measures and withdrawing military aid to help assisting in the drug wars. (3) (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html)

The press has blown up because under an internal code of the World Health Organisation baby formula companies are banned from explicitly targeting mothers and their health carers. Advertising is also controlled. This is what 3rd world nations were trying to achieve.
"We were shocked because we didn't understand how such a small matter like breast-feeding could provoke such a dramatic response," said the Ecuadorean official, who asked not to be identified because she was afraid of losing her job.(3) South American countries should be least shocked of all on the ideology of the United States. Profit over everything. Even over the corpses of a million babies a year to keep the $11.5 billion Infant Formula industry going. This new era of naked and brazenly corrupt capitalism from the United States is prime evidence of a desperate and shamelessly awful system struggling to make profits in a time of Great Power rivalries. Because in an era of great power rivalry, making some profit is not enough. Making super profits is what is required.
"In the end, the Americans' efforts were mostly unsuccessful. It was the Russians who ultimately stepped in to introduce the measure - and the Americans did not threaten them." Millions more grow up in conditions of malnutrition and stunted growth at a key time of their development. All so corrupt companies like Abbot Laboratories & Nestle can earn that sweet, sweet profit. It has been common consensus for decades now that breastfeeding is the preferred method of feeding your child. Even under conditions that are ideal for infant formula (ie. in the first world with easy access to clean water etc).

Abbot Laboratories was one of the companies to produce infant formula for sale in the 3rd world. Abbot Laboratories also contributed to a part of $107 million to Trumps inauguration. (4) (https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/health-companies-gave-generously-president-trumps-inauguration/)
"For a time, many companies employed ''mothercraft'' nurses, most of whom wore white uniforms, who visited women in maternity wards and in their homes. As they helped mothers to cope with infant-rearing problems, many of the nurses also promoted their company's formula. Dressed in traditional nurses' uniforms, they conveyed the false impression that independent health professionals - not company employees - were recommending formula feeding." (2) (https://www.nytimes.com/1981/12/06/magazine/the-controversy-over-infant-formula.html?pagewanted=all) But conditions in the 3rd world aren't ideal. A lack of access to both money to buy the formula and access to clean water has meant mothers are watering down their baby formula with dirty water.

"Director general of the W.H.O., says that 'evidence from developing countries indicates that infants breast-fed less than six months, or not at all, have a mortality rate 5 to 10 times higher in the second six months of life than those breast-fed six months or more.'"(2)

Infant formula was a terrible solution to a problem that never should have existed outside of fringe cases where a mothers milk has dried up due to stress/health reasons. The current corporate drive to replace breastmilk with a profitable artificial product is convincing women perfectly capable of producing wholesome, plentiful breastmilk to become consumers of expensive, imperfect and sometimes lethal infant formula(8) (https://newint.org/features/1982/04/01/babies/). But it does showcase brilliantly how innovative capitalism is. It can create a market from anything. It also shows how the capitalist world uses the full arm of its advertising, propaganda and cultural penetration to make profit from the world where there should be none. It is a scandal that it remains a $11.5 billion and growing market. (5) (http://uk.businessinsider.com/nestles-infant-formula-scandal-2012-6/#cial-rights-groups-say-baby-food-companies-still-dont-comply-14)

A big problem in the third world was that the advertising portrayed Infant Formula as the best thing for their children despite the World Health Organisation saying it wasn't and the companies themselves knowing it wasn't. Aggressive advertisement by these companies has led to women in Third world nations believing it to be superior to breast milk. The advertisements (though subtly) hinted that formula milk was better and breastfeeding was for the lower classes.(8) (https://newint.org/features/1982/04/01/babies/)
Banned from entering maternity wards directly in Singapore for example, Dumex milk nurses would wait just outside the hospital gates to catch new mothers with free samples on their way home.(8) (https://newint.org/features/1982/04/01/babies/) This naked display of power and aggression by a waning United States that no longer feels it can get what it wants via diplomacy and soft power, particularly with an issue as benign as Infant formula and mortality rates should offer a glimpse into just how corrupt the country is.

In January of this year David Norquist, the Under Secretary of Defense in the US department of Defense, declared an end to the war on terror and opening the $686 billion budget for the military said,
"Great power competition, not terrorism, has emerged as the central challenge to U.S. security and prosperity. It is increasingly apparent that China and Russia want to shape a world consistent with their authoritarian values and, in the process, replace the free and open order that has enabled global security and prosperity since World War II."(6) (https://fpif.org/the-pentagon-is-planning-a-three-front-long-war-against-china-and-russia/) Those values he ascribes to appear to be "profit over the lives of babies". And he is prepared to pursue those values, of unfettered free market violence, via a three front war against Russia and China. (7) (https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1439211/presidents-fiscal-2019-defense-budget-request-calls-for-6861-billion/source/GovDelivery/)

The resolution on breastfeeding was introduced however purely because the Russians chose to throw their weight behind it. A Russian delegate had this to say on the matter.
"We're not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world." (3) (https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html) I deliberately, in my writings, do not use the terms "developed" or "undeveloped countries". It is not accurate to describe nations in Africa/Asia or Latin America as "undeveloped" which implies some kind of fault on their behalf. Third world nations have been systematically under-developed by the first world. Every corporation from the west has come to those shores to extract their pound of flesh from the people which leaves them in abject poverty or outright kills them. The infant formula scandal is just one example of a thousand in seeing how western corporations make their super profits off the backs of the Third World. And they are happy to do it with the result of quite literally millions of dead children and millions more who are stunted in the first years of their lives ensuring that they will endure physical/mental suffering the rest of their lives.

Beware the foreign 'nurses' that come bearing gifts.

(1) http://archive.babymilkaction.org/pdfs/babykiller.pdf

(2) https://www.nytimes.com/1981/12/06/magazine/the-controversy-over-infant-formula.html?pagewanted=all

(3) https://www.nytimes.com/2018/07/08/health/world-health-breastfeeding-ecuador-trump.html

(4) https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/health-companies-gave-generously-president-trumps-inauguration/

(5) http://uk.businessinsider.com/nestles-infant-formula-scandal-2012-6/#cial-rights-groups-say-baby-food-companies-still-dont-comply-14

(6) https://fpif.org/the-pentagon-is-planning-a-three-front-long-war-against-china-and-russia/

(7) https://www.defense.gov/News/Article/Article/1439211/presidents-fiscal-2019-defense-budget-request-calls-for-6861-billion/source/GovDelivery/

(8)https://newint.org/features/1982/04/01/babies/

Related:

US bullies smaller nations into adopting anti-breast-feeding WHO resolution, until Russia steps in... (https://www.sott.net/article/390490-US-bullies-smaller-nations-into-adopting-anti-breast-feeding-WHO-resolution-until-Russia-steps-in)

Russia steps in to stop US bullying on the WHO's anti-breastfeeding policy (https://www.sott.net/article/390679-Russia-steps-in-to-stop-US-bullying-on-the-WHOs-anti-breastfeeding-policy)

Breastfeeding For Just Two Months Dramatically Reduces SIDS Risk, Study Finds (https://www.sott.net/article/380745-Breastfeeding-For-Just-Two-Months-Dramatically-Reduces-SIDS-Risk-Study-Finds)

Absurd new study claims that describing breastfeeding as 'natural' reinforces gender roles and therefore unethical (https://www.sott.net/article/350297-Absurd-new-study-claims-that-describing-breastfeeding-as-natural-reinforces-gender-roles-and-therefore-unethical)

Neuroscience shows breastfeeding is not just milk (https://www.sott.net/article/343206-Neuroscience-shows-breastfeeding-is-not-just-milk)

onawah

11th July 2018, 21:06

This is troubling and certainly needs watching.

Abbot Laboratories was one of the companies to produce infant formula for sale in the 3rd world. Abbot Laboratories also contributed to a part of $107 million to Trumps inauguration. (4) (https://www.spectrumnews.org/news/health-companies-gave-generously-president-trumps-inauguration/)[INDENT] ]
Also see:http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-5935091/Trump-blasts-New-York-Times-fake-story-U-S-role-breastfeeding-resolution.html
"Trump blasts New York Times for 'fake' story that reported US threatened Ecuador with trade sanctions if they pushed a UN resolution encouraging breastfeeding
President Trump says his administration supports breastfeeding but also wants women to have access to formula.In third world countries, there is an added danger to babies from using infant formulas, which require water added, because 'levels of infectious disease are high and access to safe water is poor,' a 2015 report from UNICEF found.

The report also noted the dilution ration must be correct or babies will suffer from malnutrition and the bottles must be adequately cleaned.

The baby formula companies are predominately American or European, including Nestle and Mead Johnson.

When the Trump administration failed to convince member states to water down the language about breastfeeding and formulas, it resorted to threats, according to The New York Times.

The administration told Ecuador that if it did not pull its resolution, it would respond by cutting military aid and adopting harsh, retaliatory trade measures.

Ecuador capitulated and did as the Americans demanded, The Times reported.

Health officials who had advocated for the resolution in favor of breast milk were shocked, they said.

They frantically tried to find other countries who would sponsor the resolution, but these nations - mostly from Latin America and Africa - were frightened off by the specter of American threats.

'We were astonished, appalled and also saddened,' said Patti Rundall, policy director of Baby Milk Action, a pro-breastfeeding advocacy group.

'What happened was tantamount to blackmail, with the U.S. holding the world hostage and trying to overturn nearly 40 years of consensus on the best way to protect infant and young child health.'

Eventually, the resolution was introduced by Russia and subsequently approved.

The Americans did not threaten Moscow as they did Ecuador and other countries, according to the Times.

The Department of Health and Human Services, which tried to change the wording of the resolution, denies that it was involved in making threats against Ecuador.

'The resolution as originally drafted placed unnecessary hurdles for mothers seeking to provide nutrition to their children,' an H.H.S. spokesman said.
President Trump slammed the New York Times story as 'fake'

'We recognize not all women are able to breastfeed for a variety of reasons.

'These women should have the choice and access to alternatives for the health of their babies, and not be stigmatized for the ways in which they are able to do so.'

The State Department declined to comment.

Research has shown that mother's milk contains far more nutrients that are necessary for a baby's health than infant formula.

And breastfeeding 'saves lives, protects babies and mothers against deadly diseases, and leads to better IQ and educational outcomes,' according to a May report from UNICEF.

Companies that sell baby formula generate $70billion annually, but those sales have been stagnant due to the increased popularity of breastfeeding.

A Russian diplomat told the Times that his country's decision to advance the breastfeeding resolution was an easy one to make.

'We're not trying to be a hero here, but we feel that it is wrong when a big country tries to push around some very small countries, especially on an issue that is really important for the rest of the world,' the diplomat said.

An Ecuadorian official said that his government did not anticipate the harshness of America's response.

'We were shocked because we didn't understand how such a small matter like breastfeeding could provoke such a dramatic response,' the official said. "

It's hardly a "small matter!"

Hervé

17th November 2018, 17:38

New report reveals US water suppliers cover up spikes in hormone-disrupting herbicide contamination (https://www.rt.com/usa/444228-toxic-drinking-water-coverup/)

RT (https://www.rt.com/usa/444228-toxic-drinking-water-coverup/)
Sat, 17 Nov 2018 16:38 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497668/large/5bef8b1bdda4c808078b461c.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497668/full/5bef8b1bdda4c808078b461c.jpg)
© Reuters / Ilya Naymushin

Taking advantage of regulatory loopholes, US water suppliers may be concealing alarmingly high concentrations of toxic herbicides in Americans' drinking water, according to a new report from the Environmental Working Group.

The report (https://www.ewg.org/research/hormone-disrupting-weed-killer-taints-drinking-water-millions-americans) found more than 30 million Americans' drinking water is contaminated with atrazine, a known endocrine and reproductive disruptor linked to increased risk of preterm births and fetal deformities. Worse, discrepancies between reported federal and state measurements of the contamination suggest that local water utilities are gaming the regulatory system to avoid reporting "spikes" in contamination from the increase in herbicide usage during the farming season.

EPA regulations permit water utilities to report annual averages for drinking water contaminants, allowing them to mask spikes in runoff during the growing season by averaging them with the low levels found during the winter - or even not to measure during the high season at all.

EWG senior science advisor Olga Naidenko accused the utilities of "playing the dates game," covering up illegal levels of atrazine contamination by cleverly timing their measurements, and the report found 70 percent of utilities had sampled contamination outside of high usage periods or reported lower contamination levels than the EPA.

While the US allows up to three parts per billion (ppb) of atrazine in drinking water, California classified it as a "substance known to cause reproductive toxicity" in 2016 and the EU banned it in 2003. Since 1999, the California Office of Environmental Health Hazard Assessment has advised lowering the legal level of atrazine to .15 ppb, based on a study linking the chemical to breast cancer in rats.

EPA figures showed some utilities reported "spikes" as high as seven times the legal limit last year. Evansville, Illinois, led the toxic pack with a high of 22 ppb, followed by Piqua, Ohio, which spiked to 16 ppb. Federal authorities are not required to report these spikes to residents, even though a relatively uncomplicated water filter neutralizes much of the danger from the herbicide. More water utilities in Texas tested positive for atrazine than any other state - 472 - with Kansas a distant second at 233.

https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497667/large/5bef8a29fc7e935c298b45f7.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s24/497667/full/5bef8a29fc7e935c298b45f7.jpg)
© Environmental Working Group

Though not as infamous as Monsanto's glyphosate, atrazine is the second-most commonly used herbicide in the US. In 2013, manufacturer Syngenta settled a class action lawsuit over contamination of drinking water sources in Illinois, Iowa, Ohio, Missouri, and Kansas, paying out $105 million to communities hardest-hit by the contamination. Nearly a dozen recent human epidemiological studies have confirmed negative health outcomes associated with the herbicide, including increased risk of preterm delivery and low birthweight.

While the EPA has shown a reluctance to reassess its public position on atrazine's negative health impact, public sentiment can change quickly, as August's legal ruling against Monsanto has demonstrated. After courts ruled the company's Roundup brand of glyphosate weed killer was responsible for a groundskeeper's non-Hodgkins lymphoma, more than 9,300 plaintiffs have filed their own suits seeking damages.

Related: Revealed: How Syngenta Investigated the Press and Shaped the News About its Controversial Weed-Killer Atrazine (https://www.sott.net/article/241497-Revealed-How-Syngenta-Investigated-the-Press-and-Shaped-the-News-About-its-Controversial-Weed-Killer-Atrazine)

Baby Steps

22nd December 2018, 07:31

BREAKING NEWS FROM ITALY:

NO ANTIGENS found in the Infanrix Hexa vaccine, only chemicals.

"With the onset of government vaccine mandates, which suddenly required Italian children to be injected with 11 vaccines to attend school, the Italians are fighting back. First, they voted out the government that pushed for the mandates calling their movement #GovenmentofChange. Then on December 4, the new Italian health minister kicked out all 30 members of the health policy advisory board.

On December 13, Corvelva, a scientific research group, announced it had received €10,000 (US$11,350) from the Italian National Order of Biologists with plans to use the money to test the contents of every vaccine currently on the market. The result of their first test was released on December 16, and the report is a doozie.

You certainly won’t hear this in the MSM.

The first vaccine they thoroughly tested was Infanrix Hexa – a six-in-one vaccine manufactured by GlaxoSmithKline (GSK) that is *supposed* to contain the following antigens: tetanus, diphtheria and pertussis toxoids; inactivated poliomyelitis viral strains 1-2-3; and hepatitis B surface antigen. Shockingly, Corvelva found NONE of these antigens in the vaccine, meaning, that NO antibodies to the intended antigens will be created.

And it gets worse. In addition to no vaccine antigens, they found the following:

traces of 65 chemical cross-contaminants from other manufacturing lines;
chemical toxins;
unrecognizable macromolecules;
various free bacterial peptides that are potential allergens and are capable of inducing autoimmune reactions.
These findings could bring justice to parents who lost their children in 2009 when 36 children died and more than 1,700 were injured in a “clinical trial” – the nice name for human experimentation.

I suspect that as they continue to test each of the vaccines in the childhood schedule, they will find metallic compounds, nanotechnology and a long list of chemical contaminants."

-Dr. Sherri Tenpenny

Vaccinegate: Initial results on Infanrix Hexa chemical composition:

https://www.corvelva.it/speciali-corvelva/analisi/vaccingate-initial-results-on-infanrix-hexa-chemical-composition.html

Hervé

29th December 2018, 17:12

Something smelly detected in that Dane kingdom:

Peter C. Gøtzsche: My dismissal is scientific judicial murder (http://www.nogracias.eu/2018/12/15/my-dismissal-is-scientific-judicial-murder-by-peter-c-gotzsche/)

nogracias.eu (http://www.nogracias.eu/2018/12/15/my-dismissal-is-scientific-judicial-murder-by-peter-c-gotzsche/)
Wed, 26 Dec 2018 14:17 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/503491/large/MyDismissalisScientificJudicia.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/503491/full/MyDismissalisScientificJudicia.jpg)

Translation of text “Min fyring er et videnskabeligt justitsmord”
Politiken 11 Dec 2018

It is a full-blown scandal that Rigshospitalet will dismiss me. It is a clear attack on both independent research and freedom of expression.

Peter C. Gøtzsche Professor and Suspended Director, Nordic Cochrane Centre

You would not believe that this could happen in a country like Denmark. That Rigshospitalet fires an official without prior service warning who co-founded the Cochrane Collaboration 25 years ago, created the Nordic Cochrane Centre out of nothing and made it a world-class research centre.

Deputy director of Rigshospitalet, Per Jørgensen's official reason for firing me is that he has lost confidence in my ability to lead the centre. This is not an objective reason and it is contradicted by my results.

The firing was brutal. It took place on October 29, during my first official call ever. I was suspended and treated as if I had committed serious crime. I was not even allowed to go back to my office and my staff were banned from contacting me, which in particular my 5 PhD students cannot understand the reasoning behind, and they have written to the hospital and the minister and pointed out that they cannot do their work without me as supervisor. Jørgensen and Personnal Manager Mette Risak preferred to avoid a firing and therefore invited me to enter into a "mutual agreement on resignation", as it is misleadingly called, with a few months extra salary beyond the three months I would receive in any case.

My union was proud that they had negotiated 10 months' extra pay, which had never happened before, while I took it as an indication that the hospital had an immensely bad case that would not withstand public spotlight. The agreement mentioned that:
There is agreement between the parties that the content of the agreement is not communicated to third parties. Announcement to employees and relevant internal and external partners will be agreed with the Executive Board. The agreement is the complete and final decision about any claim between the parties without prejudice." Total gagging. I reported back a week later, copying the Ministry, that my freedom of speech is not for sale and that what was going on should come to light. In my letter, I wrote that politicians and patients are very happy about my efforts; that in 2015, psychiatric patients voted for me to become Dane of the Year and I ended up in top 10; that in 2016 I became Protector of the Hearing Voices Network; that everyone has attached great importance to the independence of the Centre; and that I have saved the community billions of Danish kroner by just three of my reviews.

I also wrote that I thought my impending firing was about silencing an important voice in the debate, just like my expulsion from the Cochrane Collaboration on September 13th. Cochrane's leadership was very annoyed that I had published a well-founded criticism of the Cochrane review of the HPV vaccines (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-hpv-gardasil), and I was told that it is bad behavior to criticize colleagues' science when you are a Governing Board member or a Cochrane Director. Obviously, this is scientific censorship.

By reviewing the randomized trials we received from the European Medicines Agency, we have shown that the HPV vaccines may cause serious neurological harms, which the authorities otherwise claim do not exist. We are publishing this, also in a PhD thesis, and we presented the results at our 25th anniversary symposium at Rigshospitalet on October 12th.

Instead of silencing an important voice, Rigshospitalet and the Ministry should protect me. Firing me sends the unfortunate signal that if your research results are inconvenient and cause public turmoil, or threaten the pharmaceutical industry's earnings, which we are very concerned about in Denmark, we will fire you. Strikingly many of the documents my lawyer has obtained from the Ministry through the Freedom of Information Act are articles where healthcare stakeholders - e.g. psychiatrists, doctors with conflicts of interest, the Health and Medicines Agencies, and editors of journals financed by the pharmaceutical industry - try to depict me as untrustworthy to promote their own interests.

It led to massive resentment, with several articles in, for example, Science, Nature, BMJ and Lancet, that I was expelled from the Cochrane Collaboration after a process where new accusations were invented on the spot after Cochrane's own lawyer's investigation had exonerated me from all charges. I believe I have unequivocal evidence that the process is invalid. The next day, four members resigned from the board in protest.

The case is not about my person, but about important principles that the leadership of Cochrane trampled underfoot. Cochrane's credibility plummeted because I am known for high quality research, integrity and incorruptibility.

The 31 Centre Directors in Spain and Latin America demanded an independent investigation of the Cochrane process against me, which the Board rejected because such an investigation would lead to its demise. I have complained to the Charity Commission in England about serious mismanagement committed by Cochrane's CEO Mark Wilson and the Governing Board who have violated all the key rules for charities and for Cochrane.

Why does Rigshospitalet want to fire me? It is extremely rare that Rigshospitalet fires a chief physician. I have taken care of the interests of the Nordic Cochrane Centre, the Cochrane Collaboration, the patients and Denmark, and believe I have served my country in an exemplary manner during my 25-years senior role as an official.

Others share my view. More than 8000 signatures have been sent to the minister with a request to overturn my sacking, with such prominent names as Cochrane co-founder, Sir Iain Chalmers, BMJ's editorin-chief, Fiona Godlee, Member of the European Parliament Margrete Auken who has done a lot to make data available to researchers, psychiatrist David Healy, highly respected as one of the world's leading experts on psychiatric drugs, and the world's most cited health researcher, John Ioannidis from Stanford University.

It is apparent from the correspondence that we have got access to that the Ministry and Rigshospitalet have worked closely together and with Wilson, whereas I have not been heard, although it is well documented that Wilson does not always provide a complete and correct picture, which I had warned Rigshospitalet about, and provided examples of in my hearing letter to the hospital. Wilson has required that I shall no longer be allowed to work at the Cochrane Centre, and the Ministry and Rigshospitalet have pleased him, although, according to Cochrane rules, I can continue working as head of department or as chief physician. It is outrageous that a person in this way interferes with internal affairs in another country, on top of this contrary to the rules.

The Ministry is, to a considerable extent, jointly responsible for the fact that it has come this far because the Ministry announced to Rigshospitalet on 12 October that the payment of the fiscal grant to the five Danish Cochrane groups was detained until Rigshospitalet complied with the prerequisites in the Finance Act, including ensuring that the Centre is part of the international Cochrane Collaboration.

Through our access to documents, we have recently learned that the Ministry and Rigshospitalet, since October 1 via Wilson's emails have been fully aware that the Centre has always been part of Cochrane. However, the Ministry and the hospital have kept this knowledge to themselves. At a meeting with my staff on November 5, when Jørgensen tried to explain why I would be fired, reasons of which the staff did not understand, he continued to give the impression that the Centre was not part of Cochrane.

On September 28, I tried to withdraw the Centre from the Cochrane Collaboration because I discovered via a journalist that Wilson's staff had changed our website behind our backs; had deprived us of our administrative rights without informing us; had deleted me among the employees, even though I was still employed; and had uploaded an incorrect and deeply defamatory statement from the board about me on the front page.

I acted in good faith when I tried to withdraw the Centre because the hospital has always emphasized that it was only our host and would not interfere with my dispositions, and I could not see in the remarks to the Finance Act that it was a requirement that we should participate in the Cochrane Collaboration. Later, it dawned on me that the withdrawal was never enforced because Wilson did not approve of it.

My staff has been very afraid of losing their jobs and still are because the Finance grant is being withheld. The Ministry and Rigshospitalet has caused great and unnecessary insecurity among about 50 employees through two months by giving, contrary to the facts, the outside world the impression that the conditions for payment of the grant were not met. This has nothing to do with whether I'm still working at the Centre because its Deputy Director will handle Cochrane related tasks if I cannot or must not do it. It seems that the Ministry and the hospital have used all means at their disposal needed to accommodate Wilson's unusual requirement that I must be fired, even though 50 employees suffered as a result.

My situation is the result of a power struggle between two wings. One wing is led by Wilson who advocates that everyone in Cochrane should speak with the same voice; he opposes open scientific debates about the quality and reliability of concrete Cochrane reviews; he puts more emphasis on "brand", "our product" and "business" than getting the science right; and he allows economic conflicts of interest in relation to the pharmaceutical industry

The other wing wants to bring Cochrane back to its original values: Free scientific debates; no financial conflicts of interest for the researchers making Cochrane reviews in relation to the companies whose products they evaluate; and openness, transparency, democracy and cooperation.

As a member of the Cochrane Governing Board (with the largest number of personal votes of all 11 candidates, despite the fact that I was the only one who criticized Cochrane's management in my election statement), I did my best to change the situation.

Despite great support, I lost the power struggle. If that's why the health service wants to fire me, then Denmark supports Cochrane's new line of "one voice", lack of scientific debates and relationships that are too close to the pharmaceutical industry, which basically will make Cochrane superfluous.

I have suggested that the Centre changes status to a Centre for Evidence-Based Medicine, as well as several other Cochrane Centres are currently doing, because it would be of greater benefit to Denmark than to be a member of a Cochrane organization that does not live up to its declared values.

It takes many years to build a successful research centre, but only a moment to destroy it by an unwise administrative decision. Every researcher's nightmare is lack of understanding and appreciation from those who have the formal power. It has hit me totally in Cochrane and is now also hitting me in Denmark.

The case is one of principles because it is about one of the heaviest areas in healthcare: beneficial and harmful effects of medicines and other medical technologies. If you can easily get rid of inconvenient people and thus their research and participation in the academic debate, it can have serious consequences both for community health and economics. If Denmark supports Cochrane's fundamental principles of free scientific debate and independence of the pharmaceutical industry, then Denmark should provide me with all possible support instead of firing me.

Denmark should also consider if it is acceptable that someone in London, to an increasing degree, has the ability to decide what the Danish Ministry's appropriation is to be used for, and even wants to decide whether people employed with someone else's money, who have done nothing wrong, should be fired. All Cochrane Centres in the world, except the British one, are opposed to the strong central control of the freedom of action over the funds the centres themselves have acquired.

If Rigshospitalet fires me, it will result in the following:

1. Everyone loses, incl. Rigshospitalet, the Ministry, Denmark and Cochrane. Psychiatrist David Healy told in a lecture in 2000 at the University of Toronto that the world's best-selling drug, a depression pill from Eli Lilly, could lead to suicide (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/disease/suicidal-behavior). Eli Lilly was a major donor for the department, and Healy was fired. This scandal is still being talked about even though it is 18 years ago. Rigshospitalet should think about this.

2. The turmoil that already exists is going to increase considerably. Many are angry with the treatment Cochrane exposed me to and they know it comes from Wilson who controls everything, including the Cochrane Board, which I have experienced myself. If Wilson also succeeds in getting me fired, it will have unimaginable consequences. People in Cochrane are already nervous about what they may be exposed to, and many will withdraw their centres or groups when they see that Wilson's power is virtually unlimited.

3. My lawyer and I will carefully assess the basis for my sacking with the purpose of filing lawsuits for damages against Rigshospitalet for my unjustified firing, and against Cochrane for the propagation of seriously defamatory statements, with financial consequences for me. This would further harm Cochrane.

4. The Ministry, Denmark and Rigshospitalet will get an unattractive key role in the documentaries and books on scientific freedom and the fate of whistleblowers, which are being prepared. It has gained attention abroad that Denmark will not re-employ a person if he wins a case of unjustified firing.

Since the matter is of paramount importance, I have today sent a copy of my hearing to Rigshospitalet to the Minister and to the Association of Specialist Doctors. I have also sent a copy of a letter from my lawyer, which is included in my response. This is not just a case between Rigshospitalet and me.

The Ministry has a significant co-responsibility for the situation. The world's most cited health researcher has written to the Minister saying that he is confident that she does not want to be on the wrong side of history.

Peter C. Gøtzsche

Related:

The House of Cards is Falling: The shake up at Cochrane (https://www.sott.net/article/396790-The-House-of-Cards-is-Falling-The-shake-up-at-Cochrane)

Dr. Peter Gøtzsche exposes Big Pharma as organized crime (https://www.sott.net/article/352133-Dr-Peter-Gotzsche-exposes-Big-Pharma-as-organized-crime)

"Deadly Medicines and Organised Crime", interview with Dr Peter Gotzsche (https://www.sott.net/article/269406-Deadly-Medicines-and-Organised-Crime-interview-with-Dr-Peter-Gotzsche)

Psychiatric drugs kill 500k+ Western adults annually, few positive benefits - leading scientist (https://www.sott.net/article/296424-Psychiatric-drugs-kill-500k-Western-adults-annually-few-positive-benefits-leading-scientist)

Hervé

23rd February 2019, 17:41

Mandatory HPV jabs for school kids in Florida + 100 Vaccine bills flood 30 States (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/urgent-mandatory-hpv-jabs-school-kids-fl-100-vaccine-bills-flood-30-states?fbclid=IwAR2Zaemjf21uROtHv8J05WRgMzIpYXkVPjWgy9wCD5MujnCFNSG4kXLGFjQ)

Sayer Ji Greenmedinfo (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/urgent-mandatory-hpv-jabs-school-kids-fl-100-vaccine-bills-flood-30-states?fbclid=IwAR2Zaemjf21uROtHv8J05WRgMzIpYXkVPjWgy9wCD5MujnCFNSG4kXLGFjQ)
Fri, 22 Feb 2019 14:16 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511383/medium/forced_Hpv_florida_greenmedinf.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511383/full/forced_Hpv_florida_greenmedinf.jpg)

Health freedom is once again under attack in Florida and 29 other states as a tidal wave of legislation aims to coerce and/or mandate an increasing number of vaccines, as well as eliminate privacy rights around your family's vaccine status.

As reported (https://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/February-2019/more-than-100-vaccine-bills-proposed-in-30-states.aspx?utm_source=Vaccine%20Bills%20in%2030%20States%20To%20Expand%2C%20Restrict%20or%20Elimina te%20Rights&utm_campaign=July%20NVIC%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email) by the National Vaccine Information Center (NVIC), more than 100 bills have been filed in 30 states proposing to expand, restrict or eliminate vaccine informed consent rights.

This tidal wave of legislation is a near exact repeat of March of 2017's onslaught of 134 bills in 35 states (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-nvic-tracking-134-vaccine-bills-introduced-35-states).

According to NVIC, between 2015-2017, a total of 454 vaccine related bills were introduced into state legislatures. NVIC has listed (http://www.nvic.org/NVIC-Vaccine-News/February-2019/more-than-100-vaccine-bills-proposed-in-30-states.aspx?utm_source=Vaccine%20Bills%20in%2030%20States%20To%20Expand%2C%20Restrict%20or%20Elimina te%20Rights&utm_campaign=July%20NVIC%20Newsletter&utm_medium=email) all the ways in which these bills compromise informed consent and health freedom:
Compromise Vaccine Informed Consent Rights

Mandate use of new vaccines by children and adults;
Restrict or eliminate vaccine exemptions;
Restrict the list of persons who can approve vaccine exemptions
Allow vaccine providers to administer HPV and hepatitis B vaccines to minors without parental consent;
Allow forced vaccination and medical treatment under certain circumstances;
Allow state health officials to mandate all federally recommended vaccines;
Mandate that doctors and other vaccine providers track and report the vaccination status of all children and adults in electronic medical records;
Require schools to publicly post vaccination rates or vaccine exemption rates;
Require a physician signature for a religious or conscientious belief exemption to vaccination;
Require school districts to conduct health and safety visits for children under private instruction;
Require vaccines for college students based on CDC (ACIP) vaccine recommendations;
Require long term care facilities to track vaccination status of employees and residents;
Expand the release of information in the state vaccine tracking registry (such as to insurance companies);
Mandate vaccines for vendors serving hospitals and other medical facilities;
Require all insurance plans to cover all CDC recommended vaccines without copays or deductibles;
Allow pharmacists, dentists or optometrists to administer vaccines.

Expand Vaccine Informed Consent Rights

Require vaccine administrators to provide certain kinds of vaccine information to adults or parents of minor children before vaccination;
Require schools to inform parents of their right to exemptions from vaccine requirements;
Expand the list of persons who can approve vaccine exemptions;
Require legislature approval for changes to the list of vaccines required for school attendance;
Protect employees who refuse vaccination from discipline or discharge;
Clarify that refusal to vaccinate or delay vaccines is not child abuse;
Allow serologic (blood titer) proof of immunity in lieu of vaccination;
Prohibit vaccine mandates for non-communicable diseases;
Eliminate the ability of state health officials to mandate all federally recommended vaccines;
Establish that it is unlawful for an employer to mandate vaccines for healthcare employees;
Require information and notification of vaccines derived from aborted fetal tissue;
Prohibit managed care entities from imposing requirements relating to vaccination protocol;
Require parental consent before a child in protective custody can be vaccinated;
Establish a state database to monitor adverse effects of vaccinations.

We've reported previously on how the CDC funds front organizations like (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-role-undoing-vaccine-exemptions-naccho-front-group-1) The National Association of County and City Health Officials (http://www.naccho.org/) (NACCHO) (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/cdcs-role-undoing-vaccine-exemptions-naccho-front-group-1) to coordinate these efforts, not unlike how the American Legislative Exchange Council (ALEC) brings together government and private sector representatives to draft, share, and coordinate state-level legislation.

Florida, as recently as last year, experienced a deluge of vaccine bills intent on stripping health freedom related to vaccination exemptions and privacy. Due to a grassroots campaign to raise awareness, all 4 vaccine bills were defeated (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/breaking-major-health-freedom-victory-4-vaccine-bills-defeated-fl).

Now, a nearly identical set of bills (3 this year instead of 4), have been introduced, intent on once again stripping Floridians of the right to opt out of vaccine tracking and online registries of their status, as well as two bills to mandate HPV vaccination for entry to school.

Thanks to the National Vaccine Information Center's advocacy portal (https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx), and despite zero mainstream media reporting on the topic, this tactic was exposed. The first bill (SB 354), introduced by Senator Bill Montford, will severely limit health freedom in the state of Florida by massively expanding the intrusive Florida SHOTS vaccine tracking system. According to NVIC,
"If SB 354 passes, everyone single person from birth to 23 will be tracked in this intrusive Florida vaccine enforcement and surveillance system either with their vaccination records or marked as a vaccine tracking refuser! There is no opting out of some kind of tracking in this system." The details of the bill and action steps to defeat it are included in the NVIC release here (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/blog/urgent-action-item-oppose-fl-bill-sb-354-help-stop-vaccine-tracking-all).

Two Mandatory HPV Vaccine Bills Released in Florida

The two HPV vaccine bills, HB 245 (https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/245/BillText/Filed/PDF) and SB 356 (https://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/356/BillText/Filed/HTML), introduced by Representative Heather Fitzenhagen, District 78, Fort Myers, and Senator Jose Javier Rodriguez, District 37, Miami-Dade County, respectively, will include HPV vaccines (which has historically caused the most adverse effects of any vaccine in the CDC schedule (http://www.greenmedinfo.com/anti-therapeutic-action/vaccination-hpv-gardisil)) as mandatory for school entry.*

avid

23rd February 2019, 18:32

Re post #79 Herve
This is absolutely criminal - totally horrendous, maim and murder-on-demand by globalist corporations gone wild. We can’t even complain or refuse publicly any more without severe censorship. Dreadful times, beyond evil, yet day-to-day the sheeple wander into clinics and offer up their offspring - as ‘that is expected, always has been, for their own good’ I am ridiculed when I warn parents, but they still go on and sacrifice their children.

Today, there are many adverts in MSM to encourage folk to leave/pledge money in their wills to Cancer Research UK (CRUK), yet their business model defies cure as it would NOT be profitable, so what happens to literally the billions left to this duplicitous ‘fake cure promise’ rip-off??? WAKE UP, they will never want to cure anyone (apart from a few ‘success stories’ under sufferance), as if everyone could be cured the Big Pharma would not be needed, yet this should NOT be the case, people would be supportive of Big Pharma if they really did a supportive role, so who is shooting itself in the foot via lies and deception...?

Hervé

23rd February 2019, 18:33

The pill is destroying women's bodies and everyone is ignoring it for money (https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/the-pill-is-destroying-our-bodies-and-everyone-is-ignoring-it-for-money/)

Mary Margaret Olohan Evie Magazine (https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/the-pill-is-destroying-our-bodies-and-everyone-is-ignoring-it-for-money/)
Wed, 20 Feb 2019 17:25 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511272/large/b6b1c5de_74bf_4d5d_aa7b_fd28bc.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511272/full/b6b1c5de_74bf_4d5d_aa7b_fd28bc.jpg)

We've been told that birth control is one of the great inventions of our time and that we would be foolish not to take it. The truth is, we've been lied to.

Birth control is sexist towards women - and it is incredibly damaging to our bodies. This is pretty ironic, considering we are always told that birth control is empowering, right? Yet even the history of birth control reveals an utter lack of respect for the dignity of women.

Women were the Guinea Pigs
The creation of the pill was sketchy - to say the least. Prompted by Margaret Sanger, millionaire Katherine McCormick funded studies for Harvard Professor Gregory E. Pincus (http://www.theradicalnotion.com/birth-control-pill-in-puerto-rico/); studies focused on ways in which women could prevent pregnancy without a man knowing.

After years of experimenting various pills on rabbits, Pincus conducted birth control experiments which he claimed were "fertility studies" (https://www.washingtonpost.com/news/retropolis/wp/2017/05/09/guinea-pigs-or-pioneers-how-puerto-rican-women-were-used-to-test-the-birth-control-pill/?noredirect=on&utm_term=.9be5d068ebec) by exploiting helpless patients in a Massachusetts mental institution. He did not tell his patients what pills he would give them - they were expected to take the pills and suffer the consequences while he documented the results. Men were unable to stand the procedures, as Pincus' experiments caused testicle shrinking and "castration anxiety." So Pincus decided to focus in on women - despite the fact that women also had horrible side effects to his pills; blood clotting, bloating, mood swings, etc

The Victims of Puerto Rico
As he ran out of women willing to be sliced and diced in his experiments, Pincus focused in on Puerto Rico. The country suffered from poverty and overpopulation, and the government was already highly interested in birth control. Pincus recruited female students from the University of Puerto Rico and was extremely angry when more than half of them dropped out due to the violent side effects of the pill. (https://www.pbs.org/wgbh/americanexperience/features/pill-puerto-rico-pill-trials/) He and his colleagues resorted to forcing students to cooperate - or receive failing grades in their classes.

The first versions of the pill had almost ten times the amount of hormones needed to prevent pregnancy. But that didn't stop Pincus' experimentation on women - experiments that hadn't even been entirely successful on animals. And let's not forget that the creators of the pill opted to experiment on women instead of men. Feminists at the time weren't happy about it. At a Capitol Hill investigation of the pill's safety (about ten years later), activist Alice Wolfston shouted (https://www.thecrimson.com/article/2017/9/28/the-bitter-pill/), "Why isn't there a pill for men? Why are 10 million women being used as guinea pigs?"

Women have been Silenced
Noticeably, no women were allowed to speak at this hearing - though it investigated all the negative symptoms of the pill that occurred in women. The sketchy Puerto Rico trials and the mental institution abuses were completely ignored by politicians and doctors alike - as they are to this day!

This is not unlike the way doctors and health advocates ignore the horrible side effects of birth control, today, in 2019.

Negative Side Effects of Birth Control
Recent studies (https://jamanetwork.com/journals/jamapsychiatry/article-abstract/2552796) from the Alfred Psychiatry Research Centre in Australia show that women who take birth control are at a much, much higher risk of depression than women who do not - particularly with adolescents. In fact, these studies reveal that you are twice as likely to be depressed if you are on birth control. Teenagers are at an 80% increased risk of taking antidepressants after taking the pill.

Negative short term side effects of the pill include mood swings, headaches, weight gain, breast tenderness, low libido, and nausea. Long term side effects are more extreme: anxiety, panic attacks, and reproductive issues later on in life.

Breast Cancer
Even worse - a 2017 Danish study reported in The New York Times (https://www.nytimes.com/2017/12/06/health/birth-control-breast-cancer-hormones.html) found that many types of birth control can be linked to breast cancer. The study reveals that for every 100,000 women on hormonal birth control, there are 68 annual cases of breast cancer. Research also shows that the hormone progestin (which is commonly used in birth control today) raises the risk of breast cancer.

Suicide
Think that's all? Think again. A 2017 Time Magazine article (http://time.com/5030447/birth-control-side-effects-suicide/) reported that "women taking hormonal contraceptives - like birth control pills, the patch, the ring, and hormonal IUDs (http://time.com/the-best-form-of-birth-control-is-the-one-no-one-is-using/) - have up to triple the risk of suicide as women who never took hormonal birth control."

Summary
So... that's not just increased risk of cramps, as many birth control options will tell you. It's not just increased blood flow, irritability, or headaches. The pill brings a multitude of concerns with it, both physically and psychologically. These studies not only should cause us to pause in our casual understanding of birth control. They should help us recognize that it is truly shocking and outrageous that the pill is pushed on women as a tool of empowerment and health.

Studies like these show the importance of women taking their health into their own hands - and not listening to pop culture, politicians, or government-funded health organizations who eagerly push the pill on us. In fact, maybe it's time for us to examine why we are being offered something so inherently harmful to us.

Hervé

27th February 2019, 12:27

States move to mandate deadly HPV Gardasil vaccine for children (http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/states-move-to-mandate-deadly-hpv-gardasil-vaccine-for-children/)

Brian Shilhavy Vaccine Impact (http://vaccineimpact.com/2019/states-move-to-mandate-deadly-hpv-gardasil-vaccine-for-children/)
Sun, 24 Feb 2019 16:39 UTC

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511914/large/FRAUD_Merck_Gardasil2.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511914/full/FRAUD_Merck_Gardasil2.jpg)

Pharmaceutical giant Merck's political influence is now reaching beyond the CDC and federal government, and moving into state legislatures as several states have introduced bills to mandate Merck's Gardasil HPV vaccine for children.

The HPV vaccine, which only applies to sexually active people, is not currently part of the CDC vaccine schedule, therefore separate legislation is needed to compel children to receive it.

What is withheld from the public is the fact that Merck is fighting fraud cases in U.S. courts and multiple other lawsuits around the world concerning the Gardasil vaccine, as the vaccine continues to kill and injure, primarily teenage girls. See: Nation's Leading Lawyers take on Gardasil Vaccine Fraud in U.S. Court (https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/nations-leading-lawyers-take-on-gardasil-vaccine-fraud-in-u-s-court/)

Here are the states currently considering new legislation to mandate the Gardasil vaccine against parental choice. (Note: Merck's Gardasil vaccine is the only HPV vaccine currently licensed in the U.S. So when you read "HPV Vaccine," that currently means Gardasil.)

Connecticut: SB 858 (https://www.cga.ct.gov/2019/TOB/s/pdf/2019SB-00858-R00-SB.PDF) - Allows for administration of HPV and Hepatitis B Vaccines to minors without parental consent. Public Hearing 02/25/19.

Florida: HB 245 (http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/00245/?Tab=BillHistory)/SB 356 (http://www.flsenate.gov/Session/Bill/2019/00356) - Mandates HPV Vaccine for children as a requirement for school attendance.

Illinois: SB 1659 (http://www.ilga.gov/legislation/BillStatus.asp?DocNum=1659&GAID=15&DocTypeID=SB&SessionID=108&GA=101) - Mandates HPV Vaccines for 6th grade students.

Massachusetts: SD 1520 (https://malegislature.gov/Bills/191/SD1520) - Mandates HPV Vaccine for school children.

New Jersey: A1847 (http://www.njleg.state.nj.us/bills/BillView.asp?BillNumber=A1847) - Mandates HPV Vaccines for students in grades six through 12.

New York: (2 bills) A973 (https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&term=2019&bn=A973)/S3899 (https://www.nysenate.gov/legislation/bills/2019/s3899) - Allows health care practitioners to administer HPV/Hep B Vaccines to minors without parental consent. And S298 (https://nyassembly.gov/leg/?default_fld=&leg_video=&bn=S00298&term=2019&Summary=Y&Actions=Y&Committee%26nbspVotes=Y&Memo=Y&Text=Y#jump_to_Summary) - Mandate the HPV Vaccine to the current list of vaccines required for children.

To keep up-to-date on these bills and other bills (https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx) taking away parental rights to vaccines in each state, sign up for the National Vaccine Information Center portal (https://nvicadvocacy.org/members/Home.aspx).

What Doctors Outside the U.S. are Saying About the HPV Vaccine - Foreign Lawsuits Against Merck for Gardasil Injuries

https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511915/large/Dr_G_Delépine.jpg (https://www.sott.net/image/s25/511915/full/Dr_G_Delépine.jpg)
Dr. Nicole Delépine

Censored from the U.S. "mainstream" media which is heavily funded by Big Pharma, is the fact that other countries are rejecting the HPV vaccine due to all the deaths and injuries it is causing.

Earlier this year (2019), Dr. Nicole Delépine of France, an oncologist and surgeon, revealed that statistics show a link to increased cervical cancer rates since the introduction of the HPV vaccine. See: French Cancer Surgeon: Statistics Show HPV Gardasil Vaccine Linked to Increased Cervical Cancer Rates After Years of Decline Due to Pap Smears (https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/french-cancer-surgeon-statistics-show-hpv-gardasil-vaccine-linked-to-increased-cervical-cancer-rates-after-years-of-decline-due-to-pap-smears/)

She joins French physician Dr. Dalbergue, a former pharmaceutical industry physician with Gardasil manufacturer, Merck, who stated :
I predict that Gardasil will become the greatest medical scandal of all times because at some point in time, the evidence will add up to prove that this vaccine, technical and scientific feat that it may be, has absolutely no effect on cervical cancer and that all the very many adverse effects which destroy lives and even kill, serve no other purpose than to generate profit for the manufacturers. (Source (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/mercks-former-doctor-predicts-that-gardasil-will-become-the-greatest-medical-scandal-of-all-time/).) As possibly a result of this negative press in France, the French National Agency for Medicines and Health Products Safety, which is part of the European Medicines Agency (https://www.ema.europa.eu/), which works hard to promote vaccines, participated in a study to examine whether or not the HPV vaccine had an "increased risk of autoimmune diseases."

The title of the study (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28750853?dopt=Abstract), published in August of 2017, was titled: Human papillomavirus vaccination and risk of autoimmune diseases: A large cohort study of over 2 million young girls in France.

As a pro-vaccine government agency, it is to be expected that the study would have a primary emphasis to do "damage control" to the negative public perceptions regarding the HPV vaccine and reassure the public that the vaccine was safe.

It is somewhat surprising, therefore, that the study raised any safety issues at all. They admitted that Guillain-Barré syndrome (GBS), a crippling condition similar to polio, had a significantly higher rate among those vaccinated with the HPV vaccine compared to those who were not.

Another study (https://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/28730271) published around the same time (July 2017) was conducted by doctors in Mexico at the National Institute of Cardiology.

The study pointed out several areas of concern and discrepancies, including a safety report by The European Medicines Agency.

The results of their study found:

The lack of inert placebo in the vast majority of prelicensure HPV vaccine randomized studies

Large randomized trials disclosed significantly more severe adverse events in the tested HPV vaccine cohort

Pooled safety analysis found more post-immunization symptoms in bivalent HPV vaccine vs. hepatitis A vaccine

Post-marketing HPV vaccine adverse events case series describe similar cluster of symptoms than those reported in pre-clinical trials

The European Medicines Agency report on HPV vaccine safety looked at specific diagnoses and not at symptoms clusters

In-depth analysis of some supportive post-marketing HPV vaccine safety studies discloses disquieting findings

The study found the statistics regarding the new Gardasil 9 particularly troubling, as the statistics suggest that severe harm is suffered every 140 injections. See: International Study: An Honest Look at the Statistics Shows that the HPV Vaccine is Not Safe (http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/international-study-an-honest-look-at-the-statistics-shows-that-the-hpv-vaccine-is-not-safe/)

Earlier this month (February, 2019), a Mexican doctor announced that she had actually developed a cure for the Human Papilloma Virus, so the vaccine is not even needed! See: Mexican Scientist Develops Cure for Human Papilloma Virus (https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/mexican-scientist-develops-cure-for-human-papilloma-virus/)

Negative press regarding the Gardasil HPV vaccine and Merck's legal problems can be found in France (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=france+hpv), Spain (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=hpv+spain), Japan (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=japan+hpv), Ireland (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=ireland+hpv), Denmark (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=denmark+hpv), the UK (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=uk+hpv), India (http://vaccineimpact.com/?find=hpv+india), and many others (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/hpv-vaccine-injuries-and-deaths-now-being-reported-from-central-and-south-america/).

Merck Vaccine Fraud Includes Government Vaccine Fraud
When discussing Merck vaccine fraud, it must also be mentioned that the U.S. government has a huge conflict of interest, as it profits from the sale of vaccines, and Gardasil in particular.

The U.S. Centers for Disease Control (CDC) is tasked with vaccine safety, and yet it is also the largest purchaser of vaccines, spending over $5 billion annually to purchase vaccines (https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/should-the-cdc-oversee-vaccine-safety-when-they-purchase-over-5-billion-of-vaccines-from-big-pharma/).

Julie Gerberding was in charge of the CDC from 2002 to 2009, which includes the years the FDA approved the Merck Gardasil vaccine.

Soon after she took over the CDC, she reportedly (http://www.sfgate.com/politics/article/Gush-of-bonuses-awarded-to-top-CDC-administrators-2551621.php) completely overhauled the agency's organizational structure, and many of the CDC's senior scientists and leaders either left or announced plans to leave. Some have claimed that almost all of the replacements Julie Gerberding appointed had ties to the vaccine industry (http://healthimpactnews.com/2011/cdc-continues-to-withhold-information-regarding-thimerosal-in-vaccines/).

Gerberding resigned from the CDC on January 20, 2009, and took over as the president of Merck's Vaccine division, a 5 billion-dollar-a-year operation, and the supplier of the largest number of vaccines the CDC recommends (article here (http://www.xconomy.com/national/2011/06/24/mercks-julie-gerberding-former-cdc-director-on-the-future-of-vaccines/)).

It was reported in 2015 (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/former-cdc-director-julie-gerberding-sells-38368-shares-of-merck-stock-for-2-3-million/) that Dr. Gerberding, now the executive vice president of pharmaceutical giant, Merck, sold 38,368 of her shares in Merck stock for $2,340,064.32. She still holds 31,985 shares of the company's stock, valued at about $2 million.

Besides examples like this showing a clear conflict of interest between government agencies tasked with overseeing public health and vaccine safety and pharmaceutical companies, the National Institute of Health also holds patents on vaccines such as Gardasil, and earns royalties from the sale of vaccines.

Dr. Eric Suba tried to use the Freedom of Information Act to find out how much money the National Institute of Health (NIH) earned from the sale of Gardasil (http://www.vietnamcervicalcancer.org/dmdocuments/ogis%20suba%2024%20november%202010.pdf), but they refused to report the amount of revenue the government earns from this vaccine (although not denying they do earn royalties).

With the FDA's approval of the Gardasil 9 vaccine for adults now, the government stands to earn even more revenue from this vaccine, as insurance companies and Medicare can now start picking up the cost of the vaccine.

Oppose Mandatory Gardasil Vaccination
Due to the pharma-controlled "mainstream" media's censorship of these facts about the HPV vaccine, it is likely that very few legislators know about the dangers, fraud, and controversy surrounding Merck's Gardasil vaccine.

Related:

Irish Philanthropist Jonathan Irwin - vows to stand up for Gardasil-injured Girls (https://www.sott.net/article/356488-Irish-Philanthropist-Jonathan-Irwin-vows-to-stand-up-for-Gardasil-injured-Girls)

One less girl: 12 yo dies hours after receiving Gardasil shot (https://www.sott.net/article/355473-One-less-girl-12-yo-dies-hours-after-receiving-Gardasil-shot)

The Gardasil scandal continues: Chronic Fatigue Syndrome, POTS and the dangers of aluminum-adjuvanted vaccines (https://www.sott.net/article/350214-The-Gardasil-scandal-continues-Chronic-Fatigue-Syndrome-POTS-and-the-dangers-of-aluminum-adjuvanted-vaccines)

Merck didn't bother to research the effects of Gardasil on girls' ovaries (https://www.sott.net/article/347429-Merck-didnt-bother-to-research-the-effects-of-Gardasil-on-girls-ovaries)

Gardasil exposed: HPV vaccine is being tested on infants it has killed & permanently injured thousands (https://www.sott.net/article/334466-Gardasil-exposed-HPV-vaccine-is-being-tested-on-infants-it-has-killed-permanently-injured-thousands)

Gardasil carnage: Destroying the lives of boys too (https://www.sott.net/article/321222-Gardasil-carnage-Destroying-the-lives-of-boys-too)

Lead designer of Gardasil trials now warns parents against the vaccine (https://www.sott.net/article/316531-Lead-designer-of-Gardasil-trials-now-warns-parents-against-the-vaccine)

Journal editor who removed negative study on Gardasil is Merck-insider (https://www.sott.net/article/315257-Journal-editor-who-removed-negative-study-on-Gardasil-is-Merck-insider)

More Gardasil controversy: Is the public being given all the facts? (https://www.sott.net/article/315024-More-Gardasil-controversy-Is-the-public-being-given-all-the-facts)

Mandatory HPV jabs for school kids in Florida + 100 Vaccine bills flood 30 States (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?70016-Agenda-21-Vaccines-The-Female-Of-The-Species&p=1277584&viewfull=1#post1277584)

onawah

27th February 2019, 16:32

Very telling excerpt from Nation’s Leading Lawyers take on Gardasil Vaccine Fraud in U.S. Court
https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/nations-leading-lawyers-take-on-gardasil-vaccine-fraud-in-u-s-court/

"After all, Merck was promising regulators, pediatricians and the public that inoculations given to 9-12-year-old girls would provide immunity against a relatively rare cancer that typically doesn’t kill until age 58!

Pennock explained that Merck has refused to disclose the contents of AAHS or to provide samples to independent and university scientists for testing.

AAHS, astonishingly, has never been safety tested by government regulators or by Merck.

Studies on animals conducted by world renowned independent scientists like Dr. Chris Exley, Dr. Yehuda Shoenfeld, Dr. Chris Shaw and others have found that mice and sheep exposed to aluminum adjuvants, at concentrations comparable to those found in vaccines, develop strange behavioral patterns and illnesses resembling autoimmune diseases.

A parade of deceptive canards
Robert F. Kennedy, Jr. next gave the court an explosive 50-minute presentation of 112 disturbing slides describing the parade of deceptive canards that composed Merck’s clinical trials.

Kennedy described a series of fraudulent gimmicks employed by Merck to deceive regulators during the clinical trials including the use of a “spiked” extremely toxic AAHS placebo rather than a true inert placebo that is standard for control groups in blue ribbon safety studies for other pharmaceutical products."

and

"Kennedy closed his powerful presentation by chronicling the parade of corrupt conflicts that caused HHS officials to turn a blind eye to the rife fraud that characterized the clinical trials.

Merck loaded the two FDA and CDC panels that approved Gardasil, with paid toadies. He showed that the pharmaceutical industry actually pays 45% of FDA’s annual budget and that NIH and its officials own part of the patents to the Gardasil vaccine and collect royalties on every vaccine sold.

NIH collects tens of millions of dollars annually from Gardasil sales.

Finally, 45% of CDC’s budget goes to promoting and purchasing vaccines. Merck exerts control over the CDC with millions of dollars in contributions to the CDC foundation, which allows funding for pet projects.

This level of support gives Merck the power to also punish the CDC by withholding funding if displeased by the agency."

Hervé

18th May 2019, 18:06

New Research: High HPV Cancer Rates Linked to High Gardasil Vaccination Rates – “Exactly the Opposite of what we Expected” (http://healthimpactnews.com/2019/new-research-high-hpv-cancer-rates-linked-to-high-gardasil-vaccination-rates-exactly-the-opposite-of-what-we-expected/)

Comments by Brian Shilhavy
Editor, Health Impact News

Last year (2018) we reported on the research of French oncologist Dr. Gérard Delépine (http://docteur.nicoledelepine.fr/), who published an analysis of the HPV vaccine Gardasil showing how increased rates of Gardasil vaccinations are actually correlated with a higher rate of cervical cancer. See:

French Oncologist Analysis of Gardasil Vaccine Finds Higher Rates of Cervical Cancer Associated with High Vaccination Rates (https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/french-oncologist-analysis-of-gardasil-vaccine-finds-higher-rates-of-cervical-cancer-associated-with-high-vaccination-rates/)

Now, researchers at the University of South Alabama are observing the same link of increased Gardasil vaccination rates with an increased rate of HPV related cervical cancers in Alabama.

The researchers and medical doctors commented that this was a “surprising discovery” and that it was “exactly the opposite of what we expected.”

It is highly unlikely this will be reported in any of the corporate-sponsored “mainstream” media sources.

HPV-related cancer rates affect vaccine uptake in Alabama, USA Health study says (https://www.alabamanewscenter.com/2019/03/24/hpv-related-cancer-rates-affect-vaccine-uptake-in-alabama-usa-health-study-says/)

By University of South Alabama (https://www.alabamanewscenter.com/2019/03/24/hpv-related-cancer-rates-affect-vaccine-uptake-in-alabama-usa-health-study-says/)

USA Health (https://southalabama.edu/aboutusa/usahealth.html) researchers studying HPV vaccination rates in Alabama have made a surprising discovery: Counties with higher rates of HPV-related cancers also showed higher HPV vaccination rates, according to research presented at the Society of Gynecologic Oncology’s (https://www.sgo.org/) Annual Meeting on Women’s Cancer.
“It was exactly the opposite of what we expected,” said Dr. Jennifer Young Pierce, who heads Cancer Control and Prevention at USA Health Mitchell Cancer Institute (https://www.southalabama.edu/departments/research/research-centers/cancer-institute.html).

“We found that the higher the rate of cancer in the county, the higher the rate of vaccination.”
The research was one of 12 studies accepted for oral or poster presentations at the national meeting.

The study sought to explore the reasons why vaccination rates for human papillomavirus (HPV) vary so widely among counties in Alabama, from 33 percent to 66 percent. Researchers expected to find lower vaccination rates in rural counties with fewer physicians and in counties with low incomes, which would have been consistent with national reports from the U.S. Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (https://www.cdc.gov/).

However, the data showed little difference in HPV vaccine uptake between urban and rural counties, and between affluent and poor ones. The seven counties with the highest HPV vaccination rates were both rural and low income, Pierce said.
“The main takeaway is that perception of high cancer risk overcomes traditional disparities that can affect HPV vaccine uptake.”
Meanwhile, the study also found higher HPV vaccination rates among residents who receive government-funded health care and the highest HPV rates in some counties that have no pediatricians.

Read the full article (https://www.alabamanewscenter.com/2019/03/24/hpv-related-cancer-rates-affect-vaccine-uptake-in-alabama-usa-health-study-says/).

Comment on this article at VaccineImpact.com (https://vaccineimpact.com/2019/new-research-high-hpv-cancer-rates-linked-to-high-gardasil-vaccination-rates-exactly-the-opposite-of-what-we-expected/).

More information about Gardasil (http://vaccineimpact.com/tag/gardasil/)

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2017/05/gardasil_collage-3.jpg
Images of a few of the women we have done articles about who had their lives destroyed by the Gardasil vaccine.

Illinois Teen Dies Three Weeks After Being Injected with HPV Gardasil Vaccine (https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/iowa-teen-dies-three-weeks-after-being-injected-with-hpv-gardasil-vaccine/)

California Nurse Gives Gardasil Vaccine to Own Daughter who Develops Leukemia and Dies (http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/california-nurse-gives-gardasil-vaccine-to-own-daughter-who-develops-leukemia-and-dies/)

Infant Accidentally Vaccinated with Gardasil – Mother Blamed for Vaccine Injuries and Baby Medically Kidnapped (http://vaccineimpact.com/2017/infant-accidentally-vaccinated-with-gardasil-mother-blamed-for-vaccine-injuries-and-baby-medically-kidnapped/)

The Happy-go-Lucky Girl I had Pre-HPV Vaccine is Gone Forever (https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/the-happy-go-lucky-girl-i-had-pre-hpv-vaccine-is-gone-forever/)

Iowa Girl Faces Death: Life Destroyed by Gardasil Vaccine (http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/iowa-girl-faces-death-life-destroyed-by-gardasil-vaccine/)

Gardasil Vaccine Given without Consent and Ruins Life of 14 Year Old Girl (http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/gardasil-vaccine-given-without-consent-and-ruins-life-of-14-year-old-girl/)

After 3 Years of Suffering 19 Year Old Girl Dies from Gardasil Vaccine Injuries (http://vaccineimpact.com/2016/after-3-years-of-suffering-19-year-old-girl-dies-from-gardasil-vaccine-injuries/)

Gardasil: The Decision We Will Always Regret (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-the-decision-we-will-always-regret/)

15 Year Old French Girl’s “Descent into Hell” After Gardasil Vaccine – Wheelchair Bound and Paralyzed (https://vaccineimpact.com/2018/15-year-old-french-girls-descent-into-hell-after-gardasil-vaccine-wheelchair-bound-and-paralyzed/)

The Gardasil Vaccine After-Life: My Daughter is a Shadow of Her Former Self (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/the-gardasil-vaccine-after-life-my-daughter-is-a-shadow-of-her-former-self/)

Gardasil: An Experience no Child Should Have to Go Through (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-an-experience-no-child-should-have-to-go-through/)

I Want my Daughter’s Life Back the Way it was Before Gardasil (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/i-want-my-daughters-life-back-the-way-it-was-before-gardasil/)

Gardasil Vaccine: Destroyed and Abandoned (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-vaccine-destroyed-and-abandoned/)

15-Year-Old Vaccinated by Force with Gardasil now Suffers from Paralysis and Pain (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/15-year-old-vaccinated-by-force-with-gardasil-now-suffers-from-paralysis-and-pain/)

Recovering from my Gardasil Vaccine Nightmare (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/recovering-from-my-gardasil-vaccine-nightmare/)

Gardasil: We Thought It Was The Right Choice (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-we-thought-it-was-the-right-choice/)

“HPV Vaccine Has Done This to My Child” (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/hpv-vaccine-has-done-this-to-my-child/)

13 Year Old World Championship Karate Student Forced to Quit After Gardasil Vaccine (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/13-year-old-world-championship-karate-student-forced-to-quit-after-gardasil-vaccine/)

If I Could Turn Back Time, Korey Would not Have Received any Gardasil Shots (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/if-i-could-turn-back-time-korey-would-not-have-received-any-gardasil-shots/)

What Doctors Don’t Tell You: Our Gardasil Horror Story (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/what-doctors-dont-tell-you-our-gardasil-horror-story/)

Family Fights U.S. Government over Compensation for Gardasil Vaccine Injuries (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/family-fights-u-s-government-over-compensation-for-gardasil-vaccine-injuries/)

Gardasil: When Will our Nightmare End? (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-when-will-our-nightmare-end/)

HPV Vaccine Injuries: “I Cannot Begin to Describe What it is Like to Watch your Daughter Live in Such Agony” (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/hpv-vaccine-injuries-i-cannot-begin-to-describe-what-it-is-like-to-watch-your-daughter-live-in-such-agony/)

Gardasil: Don’t Let Your Child Become “One Less” (http://vaccineimpact.com/2015/gardasil-dont-let-your-child-become-one-less/)

The Gardasil Vaccine Changed Our Definition of “Normal” (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/the-gardasil-vaccine-changed-our-definition-of-normal/)

Gardasil: I Should Have Researched First (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-i-should-have-researched-first/)

“They’ve Been Robbed of Their Womanhood” – Local Milwaukee Media Covers Gardasil Vaccine Injuries (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/theyve-been-robbed-of-their-womanhood-local-milwaukee-media-covers-gardasil-vaccine-injuries/)

Gardasil: The Day Our Daughter’s Life Changed (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-the-day-our-daughters-life-changed-2/)

Gardasil: The Decision I will Always Regret (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-the-decision-i-will-always-regret/)

Gardasil Vaccine: One More Girl Dead (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-vaccine-one-more-girl-dead/)

Gardasil: A Parent’s Worst Nightmare (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-a-parents-worst-nightmare/)

After Gardasil: I Simply Want my Healthy Daughter Back (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/after-gardasil-i-simply-want-my-healthy-daughter-back/)

Gardasil: My Family Suffers with Me (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-my-family-suffers-with-me/)

Gardasil Changed my Health, my Life, and Family’s Lives Forever (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-changed-my-health-my-life-and-familys-lives-forever/)

Gardasil: Ashlie’s Near-Death Experience (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-ashlies-near-death-experience/)

Gardasil: My Daughter’s Worst Nightmare (http://vaccineimpact.com/2014/gardasil-my-daughters-worst-nightmare/)

My Personal Battle After the Gardasil Vaccine (http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/my-personal-battle-after-the-gardasil-vaccine/)

Gardasil: The Worst Thing That Ever Happened to Me (http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/gardasil-the-worst-thing-that-ever-happened-to-me/)

A Ruined Life from Gardasil (http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/a-ruined-life-from-gardasil/)

HPV Vaccines: My Journey Through Gardasil Injuries (http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/hpv-vaccines-my-journey-through-gardasil-injuries/)

The Dark Side of Gardasil – A Nightmare that Became Real (http://vaccineimpact.com/2013/the-dark-side-of-gardasil-a-nightmare-that-became-real/)

Toddler Wrongly Injected with Gardasil Vaccine Develops Rare Form of Leukaemia (http://vaccineimpact.com/2011/toddler-wrongly-injected-with-gardasil-vaccine-develops-rare-form-of-leukaemia/)

Hervé

23rd May 2019, 15:32

“Mass Sterilization”: Kenyan Doctors Find Anti-fertility Agent in UN Tetanus Vaccine (https://www.globalresearch.ca/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-un-tetanus-vaccine-2/5678295)

By Brian Shilhavy (https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/brian-shilhavy) Global Research
May 23, 2019
Health Impact News (https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/)

Region: sub-Saharan Africa (https://www.globalresearch.ca/region/sub-saharan-africa)
Theme: Intelligence (https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/intelligence), United Nations (https://www.globalresearch.ca/theme/united-nations)

https://www.globalresearch.ca/wp-content/uploads/2019/05/tetanus-vaccine-united-nations-400x245.jpg
Image source: UNICEF (http://www.unicef.org/infobycountry/kenya_73692.html)

According to LifeSiteNews (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u), a Catholic publication, the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association is charging UNICEF and WHO with sterilizing millions of girls and women under cover of an anti-tetanus vaccination program sponsored by the Kenyan government.
The Kenyan government denies there is anything wrong with the vaccine, and says it is perfectly safe.

The Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, however, saw evidence to the contrary, and had six different samples of the tetanus vaccine from various locations around Kenya sent to an independent laboratory in South Africa for testing.

The results confirmed their worst fears: all six samples tested positive for the HCG antigen. The HCG antigen is used in anti-fertility vaccines (http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2665354), but was found present in tetanus vaccines targeted to young girls and women of childbearing age. Dr. Ngare, spokesman for the Kenya Catholic Doctors Association, stated in a bulletin released November 4:
“This proved right our worst fears; that this WHO campaign is not about eradicating neonatal tetanus but a well-coordinated forceful population control mass sterilization exercise using a proven fertility regulating vaccine. This evidence was presented to the Ministry of Health before the third round of immunization but was ignored.” (Source (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u).)
Dr. Ngare brought up several points about the mass tetanus vaccination program in Kenya that caused the Catholic doctors to become suspicious:
Dr. Ngare told LifeSiteNews that several things alerted doctors in the Church’s far-flung medical system of 54 hospitals, 83 health centres, and 17 medical and nursing schools to the possibility the anti-tetanus campaign was secretly an anti-fertility campaign.

Why, they ask does it involve an unprecedented five shots (or “jabs” as they are known, in Kenya) over more than two years and why is it applied only to women of childbearing years, and why is it being conducted without the usual fanfare of government publicity?
“Usually we give a series three shots over two to three years, we give it anyone who comes into the clinic with an open wound, men, women or children.” said Dr. Ngare.
But it is the five vaccination regime that is most alarming.
“The only time tetanus vaccine has been given in five doses is when it is used as a carrier in fertility regulating vaccines laced with the pregnancy hormone, Human Chorionic Gonadotropin (HCG) developed by WHO in 1992.” (Source (https://www.lifesitenews.com/news/a-mass-sterilization-exercise-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-u).)
UNICEF: A History of Taking Advantage of Disasters to Mass Vaccinate
It should be noted that UNICEF and WHO distribute these vaccines for free, and that there are financial incentives for the Kenyan government to participate in these programs. When funds from the UN are not enough to purchase yearly allotments of vaccines, an organization started and funded by the Bill and Melinda Gates Foundation, GAVI, provides extra funding for many of these vaccination programs in poor countries. (See: Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation Vaccine Empire on Trial in India (http://healthimpactnews.com/2014/bill-melinda-gates-foundation-vaccine-empire-on-trial-in-india/).)

Also, there was no outbreak of tetanus in Kenya, only the perceived “threat” of tetanus due to local flood conditions.

These local disasters are a common reason UNICEF goes into poorer countries with free vaccines to begin mass vaccination programs.

Health Impact News reported last year that UNICEF began a similar mass vaccination program with 500,000 doses of live oral polio vaccine in the Philippines after a Super Typhoon devastated Tacolban and surrounding areas. This was in spite of the fact there were no reported cases of polio in the Philippines since 1993, and people who have had the live polio vaccine can “shed” the virus into sewage systems, thereby causing the actual disease it is supposed to be preventing. (See: No Polio in the Philippines Since 1993, But Mass Polio Vaccination Program Targeted for 500,000 Typhoon Victims Under Age 5 (http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/no-polio-in-the-philippines-since-1993-but-mass-polio-vaccination-program-started-among-500000-typhoon-victims/).)

A very similar mass vaccination with the live oral polio vaccine occurred among Syrian refugees in 2013, when 1.7 million doses of polio vaccine were purchased by UNICEF, in spite of the fact that no cases of polio had been seen since 1999. After the mass vaccination program started, cases of polio began to reappear in Syria. (See: Are UNICEF Live Polio Vaccines Causing Polio Among Syrians? 1.7 Billion Polio Vaccines Purchased by UNICEF (http://healthimpactnews.com/2013/syrian-refugees-create-huge-new-market-for-out-dated-live-polio-vaccine-over-20-million-children-to-be-vaccinated/).)

It seems quite apparent that UNICEF and WHO use these local disasters to mass vaccinate people, mainly children and young women. Massive education and propaganda efforts are also necessary to convince the local populations that they need these vaccines. Here is a video UNICEF produced for the tetanus vaccine in Kenya. Notice how they use school teachers and local doctors to do the educating, even though the vaccines are produced by western countries.

-pJaDpq-DUI
At least in Kenya, Catholic doctors are acting and taking a stand against what they see as an involuntary mass sterilization campaign designed to control the population of Africans.

*

The original source of this article is Health Impact News (https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/)
Copyright © Brian Shilhavy (https://www.globalresearch.ca/author/brian-shilhavy), Health Impact News (https://healthimpactnews.com/2014/mass-sterilization-kenyan-doctors-find-anti-fertility-agent-in-un-tetanus-vaccine/), 2019

Related: See thread's Opening Post (http://projectavalon.net/forum4/showthread.php?70016-Agenda-21-Vaccines-The-Female-Of-The-Species&p=816739&viewfull=1#post816739)

A Voice from the Mountains

23rd May 2019, 16:11

The pill is destroying women's bodies and everyone is ignoring it for money (https://www.eviemagazine.com/post/the-pill-is-destroying-our-bodies-and-everyone-is-ignoring-it-for-money/)

This is one of many things that depresses me about having children in the current age. Knowing how evil the people behind these drug companies are, I doubt that we even know the full extent of the damage birth control does to a woman's body in general and her reproductive system in particular. And yet virtually all girls grow up taking these pills today. Even if they're not sexually active, they take them for regulating periods or hormones or whatever other excuse is given.

And considering the depopulation agendas and all the rest circulating among the same circles of crony globalist oligarchs, to suppose that all of this is intentional, a form of warfare against the common man and woman, is not too far-fetched.

Hervé

10th November 2019, 11:23

CDC Paid Maryland $123 Million to Promote Gardasil Vaccine as Requirement for School Attendance (https://healthimpactnews.com/2019/cdc-paid-maryland-123-million-to-promote-gardasil-vaccine-as-requirement-for-school-attendance/)

by Josh Mazer (https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2019/11/opinion-hpv-vaccine-incentive-payments-need-to-stop/) Eye on Annapolis (https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2019/11/opinion-hpv-vaccine-incentive-payments-need-to-stop/)
November 10, 2019

https://vaccineimpact.com/wp-content/uploads/sites/5/2019/11/Cervical-Cancer-Australia.jpg

Excerpts:

The Maryland Prevention and Health Promotion Agency (PHPA) has received millions — $123 million just between 2012–2017 (https://www.hpvisstd.com/secret-funding-exposed) — as part of an effort to require public schools to force children to get the human papilloma virus (HPV) vaccination. Those funds came in the form of grants from the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC).

The CDC maintains a nonprofit foundation that gets enormous amounts of money from Big Pharma — including Merck, the company that produces Gardasil, the HPV vaccine. At the very least, Maryland’s acceptance of those funds has the appearance of impropriety.

During a PHPA-hosted “HPV symposium” attended by state pediatric practices and Maryland Department of Health staffers in March 2018 at Ten Oaks, Maryland, the featured speaker — Dr. Alix Casler — encouraged attendees to offer free dinners, bottles of wine, and “Quality Doctor Incentives $” sales bonuses to get Maryland physicians on board with the HPV vaccine-pushing program. Dr. Casler offered a $5,000 cash payment to pediatric practices that achieve targeted HPV vaccine sales goals.

Dr. Casler is a paid spokesperson for Merck — to the tune of more than $59,000 just between 2013 and 2016, according to data compiled by ProPublica.

In 2016, the Maryland Partnership for Prevention — which lists the Maryland Department of Health as its top member — accepted $70,000 from the Association of Immunization Managers (AIM). AIM’s top “Corporate Alliance Members” are Merck, Pfizer, Sanofi Pasteur and Seqirus. That same year, legislation was introduced in Maryland to mandate the shot.

In the U.S., only three jurisdictions have made HPV vaccination mandatory: Rhode Island, Virginia and the District of Columbia. Clearly, based on the money and other incentives being injected into our public-health policy system, Big Pharma would love to see Maryland become the fourth to do so.

At the Maryland conference, then Delegate Lam promised the industry insiders that he was working with the Department of Health to mandate HPV vaccination as a “back to school” shot in Maryland. When queried, he denied it. Why is Senator Lam working in secret to advance a pharma product- and what constituency is he representing when he does so?

Money should not trump science (https://www.nytimes.com/2008/08/20/health/policy/20vaccine.html?scp=1&sq=gardasil&st=cse) 1 (https://well.blogs.nytimes.com/2008/08/29/blaming-the-media-for-gardasil-hype/),2 (https://www.latimes.com/archives/la-xpm-2008-aug-11-he-gardasil11-story.html),3 (https://slate.com/health-and-science/2017/12/flaws-in-the-clinical-trials-for-gardasil-made-it-harder-to-properly-assess-safety.html). We need to be able to trust our government. Maryland’s leaders should stop the Merck money train and focus on proven public-health strategies to help prevent HPV cancers, such as screening and avoiding risky behaviors. No amount of money should persuade our government to allow it to be pushed in our schools.

Maryland public health bureaucrats have no scientific rationale for this illogical, dangerous program. There are 250 cases of cervical cancer in our state per year, with about 60 deaths. Injecting 1.5 million young people between the ages of 9 and 29 with two doses of this shot will not change anything with regards to cervical cancer prevalence in Maryland. It will, however, provide a $750 million gravy train to Merck, the department of health, and pediatric practices in our state.

When your pediatrician earnestly pitches this shot for your healthy child, ask whether your kid is the one that tips the medical practice into the $5000 bonus pool. Ask what evidence there is that the shot prevents cancer, and why cervical cancers are surging in countries that aggressively pushed the shot. Ask why your healthy child should take the risk of becoming another Maryland HPV vaccine statistic, to be ignored, denied, and covered up. Just like the HPV vaccine caused death of Baltimore County resident Christina Tarsell.

To read the full research, a PDF is included by clicking here (https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/HPV-Vaccine-Maryland-Crabs-10-19.pdf).

Read the full article at Eye on Annapolis (https://www.eyeonannapolis.net/2019/11/opinion-hpv-vaccine-incentive-payments-need-to-stop/).

onawah

15th December 2019, 00:19

Compensate People for Forcing Them to Give Birth--Groundbreaking South Carolina Bill:

(Confusing, conflicting priorities apparently on the part of TPTB surrounding population control.
Nothing to do with vaccines, but on-topic enough, hopefully.
I've been praying that their consensual agenda isn't to put Mike Pence in as POTUS, who is supported by far Right wing Fundamentalists, and would probably doom Rowe vs Wade and ban abortions and lots of health care for women.
I'm currently reading Margaret Atwood's new sequel to "The Handmaids' Tale", "The Testaments", which is even more terrifying.
https://www.amazon.com/Testaments-Novel-Margaret-Atwood/dp/0385543786
Then today I saw this):

https://rewire.news/ablc/2019/12/13/groundbreaking-south-carolina-bill-compensate-people-for-forcing-them-to-give-birth/
Groundbreaking South Carolina Bill: Compensate People for Forcing Them to Give Birth
Dec 13, 2019, Imani Gandy

"The pre-filed bill would force a conversation in South Carolina—and hopefully nationwide—about whether anti-choice lawmakers who fancy themselves “pro-life” are actually that.
If South Carolina lawmakers are going to ban abortion after six weeks’ gestation and force every pregnant person to carry their pregnancy to term, the state should damn well pay for the costs associated with giving birth to and raising that child.

That’s the premise behind a bill called the South Carolina Pro Birth Accountability Act that state Sen. Mia McLeod pre-filed Wednesday, and boy howdy!—it is a barn burner.

The bill, SB 928, demands that anti-choice lawmakers in South Carolina who have proposed banning abortion at six weeks into pregnancy put their money where their mouth is: If lawmakers are going to force people to carry their pregnancies to term, and if they are going to deem the development of an unborn embryo as more important than the life and rights of pregnant people, then South Carolina should compensate them for acting as a gestational surrogate for the state of South Carolina.

The law points out that given the surrogacy market, a pregnant person’s uterus is not unlike a rental property: People who commission surrogates pay that surrogate to carry a fetus to term and to give birth to a child. So why should South Carolina be permitted to force its citizens to act as surrogates for the state without compensating them?

According to SB 928, South Carolina shouldn’t, and the legislation hammers this point home by making several key points:

That from a medical perspective, there is no dispute that a six-week-old embryo cannot exist outside of the womb;
That South Carolina has deemed the development of a six-week old embryo governmentally more important than the life and rights of pregnant people; and
That the six-week ban will force pregnant people who otherwise could have elected an abortion to act as a gestational surrogate for the state of South Carolina, which—and this is my favorite part—cannot itself physically conceive or carry a child.
And here’s the kicker: “just as South Carolina may not constitutionally use a citizen’s rental property without just compensation, it may not constitutionally require a woman to incubate a child without appropriate compensation.”

Whew.

Finally, someone said it.

The compensation suggested in the legislation includes reasonable living, legal, medical, psychological, and psychiatric expenses that are directly related to prenatal, intrapartal, and postpartal periods. In addition, upon detection of a fetal heartbeat, a pregnant person may claim the fetus as a child for purposes of federal or state income tax credits or deductions.

But it gets even better: Compensation also includes automatic eligibility to participate in a program that would pair a pregnant person with a specially trained nurse to provide home visits from early pregnancy through the child’s second birthday. Can you imagine? (By the way, this is de rigueur in countries like Sweden that actually give a **** about new parents.) Pregnant people would also be automatically eligible for any public assistance like TANF (Temporary Assistance for Needy Families), SNAP (Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program), and WIC, and the law would prohibit reducing or suspending those benefits until the child is 18 years old.

But wait! There’s more!

If the pregnant person becomes disabled as the result of carrying the fetus to term, then the state must cover all medical expenses associated with the disability. Similarly, if the child is born with a congenital abnormality or disability, the state must cover all medical expenses associated with that disability for the rest of the child’s life.

Also, South Carolina would be required to cover all costs associated with health, dental, and vision insurance until the child turns 18. And if the biological father of the child is unknown or unable to provide support, then the state must provide child support in the biological father’s stead.

I KNOW!

And then the grand finale: South Carolina must fully fund a college savings plan for the benefit of the child.

Inject this legislation directly into my veins.

In order to obtain compensation from the state under this law, a pregnant person would be required to file an affidavit with the Department of Social Services indicating that, but for South Carolina’s six-week ban, they would have chosen to terminate the pregnancy and not given birth to the child.

This is a groundbreaking law for two reasons. First, it gets to the heart of why anti-choicers are, by and large, hypocrites in their concern for fetuses but utter disregard for children. Far too many anti-choicers would gleefully force a pregnant person to give birth but then, once that child is born, want nothing to do with any programs or assistance that would enable new forced parents to raise that child.

But more importantly, this law is drafted from a decidedly reproductive justice framework. (I don’t think it is a coincidence that McLeod is a Black woman.)

Remember, reproductive justice places equal importance on a pregnant person’s right to raise a child in a safe and healthy environment as it does on a pregnant person’s right to terminate a pregnancy. And considering that, according to the Guttmacher Institute, the top three reasons that people choose abortion are: (1) negative impact on the pregnant person’s life; (2) financial instability; and (3) an unwillingness to be a single parent, forcing pregnant people to give birth to children that they cannot pay for—and which will inevitably sink them further into poverty—is cruel.

The Pro Birth Accountability Act likely has no chance of passing given that Republicans have a stranglehold on South Carolina’s legislature, but the law will force a conversation in South Carolina—and hopefully nationwide—about whether anti-choice lawmakers who fancy themselves “pro-life” are actually that. Or whether, as I have suspected for some time now, these lawmakers are simply pro-birth."

Gwin Ru

5th September 2020, 14:06

UN Forced to Admit Gates-funded Vaccine is Causing Polio Outbreak in Africa (https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/09/04/un-forced-to-admit-gates-funded-vaccine-is-causing-polio-outbreak-in-africa/)

By NEWS WIRE (https://21stcenturywire.com/author/21wire/)
September 4, 2020
16 Comments (https://21stcenturywire.com/2020/09/04/un-forced-to-admit-gates-funded-vaccine-is-causing-polio-outbreak-in-africa/#disqus_thread)

This really should be one of the biggest public health scandals of the decade, but instead it’s given little attention – mainly because of the high-profile nature of the people and organisations involved.

The United Nations has been forced to admit (https://www.who.int/csr/don/01-september-2020-polio-sudan/en/) that a major international vaccine initiative is actually causing a deadly outbreak of the very disease it was supposed to wipe-out.

While international organisations like the World Health Organization (WHO) will regularly boast about ‘eradicating polio’ with vaccines—the opposite seems to be the case, with vaccines causing the deaths of scores of young people living in Africa.

Health officials have now admitted that their plan to stop ‘wild’ polio is backfiring, as scores children are being paralyzed by a deadly strain of the pathogen derived from a live vaccine – causing a virulent wave of polio to spread.

https://36s81n24kn0c1i9se62v6acw-wpengine.netdna-ssl.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/09/1-AFRICA-BILL-GATES.jpg

Health officials administers polio vaccine to children at refugee camp in Maiduguri, Nigeria, Aug. 28, 2016 (AP Photo/Sunday Alamba)

This latest pharma-induced pandemic started out in the African countries of Chad and Sudan, with the culprit identified as vaccine-derived polio virus type 2.
Officials now fear this new dangerous strain could soon ‘jump continents,’ causing further deadly outbreaks around the world.

Shocking as it sounds, this Big Pharma debacle is not new. After spending some $16 billion over 30 years to eradicate polio, international health bodies have ‘accidentally’ reintroduced the disease to in Pakistan, Afghanistan, and also Iran (https://www.sciencemag.org/news/2019/07/surging-cases-have-dashed-all-hope-polio-might-be-eradicated-2019), as the central Asia region was hit by a virulent strain of polio spawned by the a pharmaceutical vaccine. Also, in 2019, the government of Ethiopia ordered the destruction (https://www.afro.who.int/pt/node/11337) of 57,000 vials of type 2 oral polio vaccine (mOPV2) following a similar outbreak of vaccine-induced polio.

The same incident has happened in India (https://www.newindianexpress.com/nation/2019/oct/23/oral-polio-vaccine-causing-paralysis-in-kids-study-2051670.html) as well.

It’s important to note that the oral polio vaccine is being pushed by the Global Polio Eradication Initiative (GPEI), a consortium which is supported and funded by the Bill & Melinda Gates Foundation (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/what-we-do/global-development/polio).

All of this should be cause for concern, especially with western governments and transnational pharmaceutical giants all rushing to roll-out their new Gates-funded experimental coronavirus vaccine for the global population.

Currently, the first experimental COVID-19 vaccine is being tested on the African population (https://www.gavi.org/vaccineswork/first-african-trial-covid-19-vaccine) through GAVI Vaccine Alliance, another organization funded by the Gates Foundation. A large round of human trials is taking place in South Africa, run by the University of the Witwatersrand (https://www.gatesfoundation.org/How-We-Work/Quick-Links/Grants-Database/Grants/2018/04/OPP1191874) in Johannesburg—another Gates-funded institution.

This latest revelation from Africa should prompt journalists and health advocates to ask harder questions about the efficacy and safety of the much-hype COVID ‘miracle’ vaccine.

AP News (https://apnews.com/619efb65b9eeec5650f011b960a152e9) reports…
LONDON (AP) — The World Health Organization says a new polio outbreak in Sudan is linked to an ongoing vaccine-sparked epidemic in Chad — a week after the U.N. health agency declared the African continent free of the wild polio virus.

In a statement (https://www.who.int/csr/don/01-september-2020-polio-sudan/en/) this week, WHO said two children in Sudan — one from South Darfur state and the other from Gedarif state, close to the border with Ethiopia and Eritrea — were paralyzed in March and April. Both had been recently vaccinated against polio. WHO said initial outbreak investigations show the cases are linked to an ongoing vaccine-derived outbreak in Chad that was first detected last year and is now spreading in Chad and Cameroon.

“There is local circulation in Sudan and continued sharing of transmission with Chad,” the U.N. agency said, adding that genetic sequencing confirmed numerous introductions of the virus into Sudan from Chad.

WHO said it had found 11 additional vaccine-derived polio cases in Sudan and that the virus had also been identified in environmental samples. There are typically many more unreported cases for every confirmed polio patient. The highly infectious disease can spread quickly in contaminated water and most often strikes children under 5.

In rare instances, the live polio virus in the oral vaccine can mutate into a form capable of sparking new outbreaks.

Last week, WHO and partners declared that the African continent was free of the wild polio virus (https://apnews.com/bacb87a9e7112d0b22e0549d29f50949), calling it “an incredible and emotional day.”

On Monday, WHO warned that the risk of further spread of the vaccine-derived polio across central Africa and the Horn of Africa was “high,” noting the large-scale population movements in the region.

More than a dozen African countries are currently battling outbreaks of polio caused by the virus, including Angola, Congo, Nigeria and Zambia.

Amid the coronavirus pandemic, many of the large-scale vaccination campaigns needed to stamp out polio have been disrupted across Africa and elsewhere, leaving millions of children vulnerable to infection.

In April, WHO and its partners reluctantly recommended a temporary halt to mass polio immunization campaigns, recognizing the move could lead to a resurgence of the disease. In May, they reported that 46 campaigns to vaccinate children against polio had been suspended in 38 countries, mostly in Africa, because of the coronavirus pandemic.

Some of the campaigns have recently been re-started, but health workers need to vaccinate more than 90% of children in their efforts to eradicate the paralytic disease.

Health officials had initially aimed to wipe out polio by 2000, a deadline repeatedly pushed back and missed. Wild polio remains endemic in Afghanistan and Pakistan; both countries also are struggling to contain outbreaks of vaccine-derived polio.

Gwin Ru

3rd December 2020, 17:58

Head of Pfizer Research: Covid Vaccine is Female Sterilization (https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization/)

December 2, 2020 (https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/head-of-pfizer-research-covid-vaccine-is-female-sterilization/)

https://healthandmoneynews.files.wordpress.com/2020/12/wodargyeadon-min.jpg

The vaccine contains a spike protein (see image) called syncytin-1, vital for the formation of human placenta in women. If the vaccine works so that we form an immune response AGAINST the spike protein, we are also training the female body to attack syncytin-1, which could lead to infertility in women of an unspecified duration.

https://i1.wp.com/tapnewswire.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/spikeproteinclose.jpg

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon request a stop of all corona vaccination studies and call for co-signing the petition

On December 1, 2020, the ex-Pfizer head of respiratory research Dr. Michael Yeadon and the lung specialist and former head of the public health department Dr. Wolfgang Wodarg filed an application with the EMA (https://2020news.de/wp-content/uploads/2020/12/Wodarg_Yeadon_EMA_Petition_Pfizer_Trial_FINAL_01DEC2020_EN_unsigned_with_Exhibits.pdf), the European Medicine Agency responsible for EU-wide drug approval, for the immediate suspension of all SARS CoV 2 vaccine studies, in particular the BioNtech/Pfizer study on BNT162b (EudraCT number 2020-002641-42).

Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon demand that the studies – for the protection of the life and health of the volunteers – should not be continued until a study design is available that is suitable to address the significant safety concerns expressed by an increasing number of renowned scientists against the vaccine and the study design.

On the one hand, the petitioners demand that, due to the known lack of accuracy of the PCR test in a serious study, a so-called Sanger sequencing must be used. This is the only way to make reliable statements on the effectiveness of a vaccine against Covid-19. On the basis of the many different PCR tests of highly varying quality, neither the risk of disease nor a possible vaccine benefit can be determined with the necessary certainty, which is why testing the vaccine on humans is unethical per se.

Furthermore, they demand that it must be excluded, e.g. by means of animal experiments, that risks already known from previous studies, which partly originate from the nature of the corona viruses, can be realized. The concerns are directed in particular to the following points:

The formation of so-called “non-neutralizing antibodies” can lead to an exaggerated immune reaction, especially when the test person is confronted with the real, “wild” virus after vaccination. This so-called antibody-dependent amplification, ADE, has long been known from experiments with corona vaccines in cats, for example. In the course of these studies all cats that initially tolerated the vaccination well died after catching the wild virus.

The vaccinations are expected to produce antibodies against spike proteins of SARS-CoV-2. However, spike proteins also contain syncytin-homologous proteins, which are essential for the formation of the placenta in mammals such as humans. It must be absolutely ruled out that a vaccine against SARS-CoV-2 could trigger an immune reaction against syncytin-1, as otherwise infertility of indefinite duration could result in vaccinated women.

The mRNA vaccines from BioNTech/Pfizer contain polyethylene glycol (PEG). 70% of people develop antibodies against this substance – this means that many people can develop allergic, potentially fatal reactions to the vaccination.

The much too short duration of the study does not allow a realistic estimation of the late effects. As in the narcolepsy cases after the swine flu vaccination, millions of healthy people would be exposed to an unacceptable risk if an emergency approval were to be granted and the possibility of observing the late effects of the vaccination were to follow. Nevertheless, BioNTech/Pfizer apparently submitted an application for emergency approval on December 1, 2020.

CALL FOR HELP: Dr. Wodarg and Dr. Yeadon ask as many EU citizens as possible to co-sign their petition by sending the e-mail prepared here to the EMA.

Related:

Oxford – Designer of Covid Vaccine Admits –“Vaccine Will Only Sterilize %70 of The Population” (https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/03/oxford-designer-of-vaccine-admits-vaccine-will-only-sterilize-%70-of-the-population/)

StarGate TV Series Warned Us In 2001 About the (https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/stargate-tv-series-warned-us-about-the-vaccination-disaster-facing-us/) Vaccination Disaster Facing Us Today (https://healthandmoneynews.wordpress.com/2020/12/02/stargate-tv-series-warned-us-about-the-vaccination-disaster-facing-us/)