Britain's Responsibility in 1914 for World War One? [Terry Boardman New Horizons]

[ktlight]

THIS HISTORY IS NOT WHAT WE WERE TAUGHT IN SCHOOL. YOU WILL NOT REGRET WATCHING THIS.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=k1yJ0zID_xw

"Published on Apr 2, 2014
Britain's Responsibility in 1914 and Its Relation to Our Current World Situation...

Terry Boardman gives a fascinating presentation to New Horizons Saint Annes on the 31st March 2014.

Think you know your history about the events leading up to the horrific war which started one hundred years ago this year? Think you're aware of the players and families creating the situations and conflicts that lead to this monumental carnage? Might be time to think again...

Terry Boardman -- a brilliant historian and researcher, addressing a very controversial and topical issue: World War I

"Those who control the past, control the future; those who control the present, control the past." ('1984' by George Orwell).

Never was this saying more true. Never was the need for understanding of historical truth more important than this year.

2014 is a crux year for England, Britain, the UK.

As we approach the centenary of the outbreak of the Great War in 1914 and the Scottish referendum on independence, the British Establishment, or rather, the transatlantic Establishment, through its instruments in academia and the media, is trying to peddle to the British people a particular view of the causes of the Great War in 1914 -- a view which is contrary to the truth. It is in essence the view they peddled in August 1914 and in 1919 after the Armistice: "German guilt" and "British righteousness".

The elite are doing this in order to keep the British people "on-side" so that they can maintain a national image of Britain and its history that they can use for their far-reaching goals in the 21st Century.

To these ends, in this year's centenary, they seek to exploit the British people's long-sorrowing sentiment over the losses of the Great War. Sorrow over the Somme and Passchendaele has been used for decades to distract our attention from who actually organised the Great War and why. The assassination at Sarajevo 1914 was the ultimate conspiracy that sparked the great conflicts of the 20th Century that shaped our world and are continuing to do so.

What has been seeking to develop as the New World Order, for example, since "the end of the Cold War" in 1989-1991, really emerged in its first outlines in 1914-1919.

In this talk, Terry Boardman, who has been drawn to the subject of the causes of the First World War since 1964, will show what is at stake in today's struggle for the truth about the reality of 1914.

Terry's website: www.threeman.org"

[Star Tsar]

Britain's got a whole lot more to take responsibility for, to me a truly SHAMEFUL history.

Thanks for the share :)

[Tesla_WTC_Solution]

Have you guys read about the iron routes in Norway, how Britain was sabotaging Hitler's iron purchases,
and he ended up just invading Norway as a result!

taken from "Signal" magazine, lol ^_^*

here's from WIkipedia tho:

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Norwegian_Campaign#Iron_ore


The Norwegian Campaign was a military campaign that was fought in Norway during the Second World War between the Allies and Germany, after the latter's invasion of the country. In April 1940, the United Kingdom and France came to Norway's aid with an expeditionary force. Despite moderate success in the northern parts of Norway, Germany's invasion of France in May 1940 eventually compelled the Allies to withdraw and the Norwegian government to seek exile in London. The campaign subsequently ended with the occupation of Norway by Germany, and the continued fighting of exiled Norwegian forces from abroad. The conflict occurred between 9 April and 10 June 1940, the 62 days of fighting making Norway the nation that withstood a German invasion for the longest period of time, aside from the Soviet Union.


Iron ore
The principal reason for Germany's invasion of Norway was its dependence on Swedish iron ore, which during the winter was shipped primarily from the Norwegian port of Narvik.[6] By securing access to Norwegian ports, the Germans could more easily obtain the supply of iron ore they needed for their war effort.[7]

The missing part is that Britain was messing with the iron shipments and port security, and that's why Hitler invaded Norway!

@_@

found it:


http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Swedish_iron_mining_during_World_War_II

From the beginning of the war, Winston Churchill expended considerable energies trying to persuade his colleagues in the British government to take action to stop the iron ore traffic. On 16 December 1939 he issued a memo to the cabinet:

It must be understood that an adequate supply of Swedish iron ore is vital to Germany…the effectual stoppage of the Norwegian ore supplies to Germany ranks as a major offensive operation of the war. No other measure is open to us for many months to come which gives so good a chance of abridging the waste and destruction of the conflict, or of perhaps preventing the vast slaughters which will attend the grapple of the main armies. The ore from Luleå (in the Baltic) is already stopped by the winter ice, which must not be broken by the Soviet ice-breaker, should the attempt be made. The ore from Narvik must be stopped by laying successively a series of small minefields in Norwegian territorial waters at the two or three suitable points on the coast, which will force the ships carrying ore to Germany to quit territorial waters and come on to the high seas, where, if German, they will be taken as prize, or, if neutral, subjected to our contraband control.

it's almost like Settlers of Catan


The Battles of Narvik were fought from 9 April to 8 June 1940 as a naval battle in the Ofotfjord and as a land battle in the mountains surrounding the north Norwegian city of Narvik as part of the Norwegian Campaign of the Second World War.

The two naval battles in the Ofotfjord on 10 April and 13 April were fought between the British Royal Navy and the German Navy (Kriegsmarine), while the two-month land campaign was fought between Norwegian, French, British, and Polish troops against German mountain troops, shipwrecked Kriegsmarine sailors and German paratroops (Fallschirmjäger) from the 7th Air Division. Although defeated at sea off Narvik, losing control of the town of Narvik and being pushed back towards the Swedish border, the Germans eventually prevailed due to the Allied evacuation from Norway in June 1940 following the Battle of France.

Narvik provided an ice-free harbour in the North Atlantic for iron ore transported by the railway from Kiruna in Sweden. Both sides in the war had an interest in securing this iron supply for themselves and denying it to the enemy, setting the stage for one of the first large-scale battles during the Second World War, since the invasion of Poland.[1]

Prior to the German invasion, British forces had considered Narvik as a possible landing point for an expedition to help Finland in the Winter War. Such an expedition might also take control over the Swedish mines and open up the Baltic for the Allies.[2] French politicians were also eager to start a second front as far away from France as possible.

France is also responsible.
They want to keep war at a distance at all costs.

People need to break the "foreign war" machine down and stop their own gov't from becoming involved in bloodbaths.

[andrewgreen]

From Egypt to Rome to Great Britain and now to America the same group of people have been pulling the strings for thousands of years, countries are just pawns in the game that they will happily sacrifice. Patriotism is a tool they use to achieve their goals, yet stepping out of the loyalty we have for our countries isn't easy.

[Taurean]

When people look at WWI they tend to focus too much on the carnage in Flanders when it was the events which unfolded in Russia and Palestine which were to have the most profound effect on the 20th century.

The Rothchilds vow to destroy the Romanovs, the Royal Navy's new found dependance on oil, the need to rid Palestine of the Ottoman Turks and install a Zionist manipulated regime were I suspect the real motives/objectives behind WWI.