Bases at The Barge Update 011c Mikkaal

[ktlight]

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=G-rU09ZKP90

"Published on Apr 14, 2014
Featuring new kid on the block "Mikkaal", who has had experience of the Programmable Generated Life Forms, and Greys, Barry King introduced to us in Bases One.

Mikkaal has been interviewed fro Bases 36, by Mirjam Janse, and Miles, but in this "rough edit on the road", he discusses Casbolt and who is controlling him, and makes the first Hard Direct Warning against the "parasites" ETs that have taken control of humanity's destiny. He does so TWICE, and does not hold back on his condemnation. Recorded in Glastonbury, shortly before the first Bases in the Barge event of April 27th 2014, so is designated Update 11C"

[SPIRIT WOLF]

I've gotta see this, experience with the PLFs and controlled by Casbolt? So many of these newbies on the scene immediately want to connect to James Casbolt. I think their way of thinking is along the lines "If I say I know or am in some way connected with Casbolt, all will listen to me" I'm far from impressed sorry, that's before watching.

[SPIRIT WOLF]

In the past there have been several of Miles Interviewees whom claim some sort of connection with James Casbolt, from my perspective I see this as they trying to get some credibility to their stories if they do so, not happy with the way these individuals think that will help them be accepted with credible claims. I'm calling them out and will name them if needed but you can all find these with ease.

[ktlight]

SPIRIT WOLF, will you be attending The Barge on 27th April 2014?

[SPIRIT WOLF]

I'd love to especially as Miles said he would like comments or an update from me. I'd love to be able to but unfortunately finances will not run to travel and possible overnight accommodation costs at this time. Besides its our 31st wedding anniversary on the 29th so me swanning off to Wiltshire might not be a great idea (spending hard to find funds on a trip rather than on anniversary). I think Miles mentioned Max Spiers is in the vicinity too, so it could be fun there LOL

[ktlight]

I'd love to especially as Miles said he would like comments or an update from me. I'd love to be able to but unfortunately finances will not run to travel and possible overnight accommodation costs at this time. Besides its our 31st wedding anniversary on the 29th so me swanning off to Wiltshire might not be a great idea (spending hard to find funds on a trip rather than on anniversary). I think Miles mentioned Max Spiers is in the vicinity too, so it could be fun there LOL

You'll be there in spirit then.
I hope to take some footage and ask a question or two.

[SPIRIT WOLF]

Indeed I shall in spirit and maybe if I get the chance and conditions are right I might ARV them. Watched the small vid. OK, the guy talks, but does not say much, you can infer what you will on that. Not impressed. Problem being anyone whom comes into the public domain now has at their feet everything via the internet. Its far too easy these days to read about stuff and concoct a pretty reasonable claim or set of claims. I do not buy it sorry, very wary of anyone coming forward in last few years. We need grill them moreso than in the past, simply because they repeat all that's out there adding their color to it. I simply do not trust these newcomers as being authentic.

[Bill Ryan]

-------

James Casbolt has stated on record that Kerry Cassidy and I are CIA assets and that Project Camelot was CIA-funded. That says everything about the integrity of his information.

I don't pay any attention to him, and consider him a deeply flawed and unreliable self-styled 'source' who only muddies the waters, a very great deal, everywhere he goes.

[SPIRIT WOLF]

And with that said Bill it does not bode well for those whom have now lined themselves up with him and perpetuate his so called claims, Max Spiers for one, then of course in equally dubious content are James Rink, Anya Briggs, and a host of others stepping into the community recently. Has anyone listened to a guy called Jay Essex? WOWEE some tall stories there. Some might support Rink and Briggs but try looking deeper into their stories. A conglomeration of internet data being trawled, refined and added to in order to state their claims.

[Limor Wolf]

The story of Milabs and people who are used at military/government/inteligence experiments/operations or as Manchurian candidates is so important, there is nothing glamorous about it, yet there seems to be a bunch of young people and sometimes older (not you Barry) who are somehow enamour with the 'role' they find themselves in, very willing to play along. Some of it is obviously a psychological reaction of trying to gain control over a situation where one has very little control. One's own beingness, one's wishes and one's desires are pretty much override when it comes to their conduct in life . But there is a well of information and verification from these experiences and forced participation in black ops of what the organisations and government are up to which can be of great benefit, and instead of bringing that out to the public, in a sincere and inteligent way (sorry about the generality, there are those who's their contribution is invaluable) it turned out (made out) to be a circus.

There is still quite a good information from those who take this study and research seriously, like James Bartley and Eve Lorgen and Fritz Springmeirer and a few others. Sarah Stanga was someone with a voice to be heard, I think. I salute everyone who find themselves in this impossible position, they are my brothers and sisters, no one else can remotely understand what it is when your life is not yours and never was, but instead of college fraternity With macho pride, it could have been nice if unity and healing and support and methods of delivering the message out would be the first priority, because the role these people play is an important one especially in the days and times we are in.

[Bill Ryan]

And with that said Bill it does not bode well for those whom have now lined themselves up with him and perpetuate his so called claims, Max Spiers for one, then of course in equally dubious content are James Rink, Anya Briggs, and a host of others stepping into the community recently. Has anyone listened to a guy called Jay Essex? WOWEE some tall stories there. Some might support Rink and Briggs but try looking deeper into their stories. A conglomeration of internet data being trawled, refined and added to in order to state their claims.

Yes, exactly -- Laura Eisenhower, too, most of whose confused claims can be traced back to Casbolt's material. He is certainly a disinformant (knowingly or otherwise), and it'd be MUCH easier making sense of this whole tangled arena without him.

[Limor Wolf]

Hi Bill, I believe Laura eisenhower gave a teriffic message in this interview, which quite resonate with what appears to be going on.


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdfIuTm2VuM
It is true that one's company is bound to have an impact on them and Laura is or was associated with some of those participants (please pay attention on how she refers to Casbolt in 09:39), but nowdays it seems that everyone is impacted by this or that person.

A 'tangled arena' sounds like a very accurate term.

At the end of the day, everything comes up to the subject of the ET's, who are we ourselves in relations to them, what we can be, our place in the galactic society and the future of this place. There bound to be different views that can tip the scales when it comes to the fate of this planet (if at all asked, in the meantime it seems that the battle is going mostly above our heads) and this should not divide us, becuase if it will, then 'failure' will be the word stamped on top of the page that will describe this earth saga.

[shadowstalker]

Indeed I shall in spirit and maybe if I get the chance and conditions are right I might ARV them. Watched the small vid. OK, the guy talks, but does not say much, you can infer what you will on that. Not impressed. Problem being anyone whom comes into the public domain now has at their feet everything via the internet. Its far too easy these days to read about stuff and concoct a pretty reasonable claim or set of claims. I do not buy it sorry, very wary of anyone coming forward in last few years. We need grill them moreso than in the past, simply because they repeat all that's out there adding their color to it. I simply do not trust these newcomers as being authentic.

Serious question here. As everyone's personal discernment seems to be different from every other persons discernment.

What criteria would you use to determine authenticity in this kind of thing?

[SPIRIT WOLF]

What criteria would I use? Not an easy question to answer simply because its impossible to say who has been tainted by the data on the internet ready and available for all to see. What raises red flags with me is someone whom claims direct experience but their info is almost quote by quote of some other individual from earlier time. I see people 'backing up' claims of similar people as if name dropping brings them credibility, it does not. These individuals are seriously messing up disclosure and its about time we separated the wheat from the chaff.

[SPIRIT WOLF]

When James Casbolt first came on the scene, in 2007 after he visited me at home in January, his claims were based on those of myself, the facility, the equipment, the personnel, everything came from the data I disclosed first 12 years earlier. He admitted he watched a video of me before he felt compelled to travel from Cornwall to see me in person. Of course over time his claims blossomed and took off in many directions, getting more bizarre as time went on. I cannot for the life of me understand how he and his claims impacted on anyone, initially it was a carbon copy of mine, those that stepped forward after him simply copied his claims. Its ridiculous.

[Agape]

Serious question here. As everyone's personal discernment seems to be different from every other persons discernment.

What criteria would you use to determine authenticity in this kind of thing?

Hope you don't mind my mischievous sense of humour here Shadowstalker ( and get me right ) ..

it's the people with more interviews , more media presentations = more trustable .

Also family name makes a lot of difference, and supportive relatives , especially those with high military ranks = more trustable .

Of course, number of degrees from Oxford , Harvard or MIT adds few points plus but not as many as you're able to create, convincingly, out of your fantastic mind,
more fantasy you have, better imagination + great intellect = more trustable .

People with less fantastic claims, keeping to groups = less trustable .

You ( the listener, supply any you ) = the least trustable ;)


Don't forget to put your common reasoning, intuitions, and sense of humour ( and not to forget your -true ego- ) always at the last place ... and listen to the ones who have already got it right, and up , to the Chair .


Right or not ? Of course not ;)

[SPIRIT WOLF]

Well done Agape my dear, your humour is well appreciated

[shadowstalker]

Well done Agape my dear, your humour is well appreciated
I second that.. :wizard:

[Agape]

Maybe the truth we're here to understand is like a movie ..rather than piece of stone,
maybe it's in the sweater you weave ,
ultimately ..for certain..it's not anyones else's understanding to do with than your own .

:angel:

[SPIRIT WOLF]

I guess the bigger picture is out of sight to us all, we see portions that maybe do not make sense but one day we will see the whole, then it just might make sense

[Cidersomerset]

It is true that one's company is bound to have an impact on them and Laura is or was associated with some of those participants (please pay attention on how she refers to Casbolt in 09:39), but nowdays it seems that everyone is impacted by this or that person.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdfIuTm2VuM


This is one of the better interviews I have heard her in, I have not heard her for a while
and she has calmed down a lot. In previous interviews I have heard her in, she was muddled
mainly because she spoke to quick, which I can understand as it hard to say less sometimes
when you are trying to get a lot of info out you are still processing. I recognise Dan Burisch
Grey timeline info and bits from David Wilcock , Andy Basiago and others, I don't necessary agree
with it but she sounds genuine.

[Agape]

I guess the bigger picture is out of sight to us all, we see portions that maybe do not make sense but one day we will see the whole, then it just might make sense

Generally ..and seriously now, I think that one moment of 'clarity' is worth thousand hours of learning ,
more 'information' and the number of books or movies watched do not warranty greater knowing . Somehow , this place ..and the web altogether is more about people who did not get this point clear enough . Like a huge attractive library .. that is not meant to give complete sense ever .

Clarity requires no 'information', no books, no movies . It only needs itself and peace of mind ......

There are millions of 'experiencers' of things on this planet that none of us are ever going to experience . This time, this moment passes .. their moment , their time ..

but there are much fewer people who see things clearly . And that's not reserved for anyone particularly or any special moment .


:sleep:

[gnostic9]

Maybe the truth we're here to understand is like a movie ..rather than piece of stone,
maybe it's in the sweater you weave ,
ultimately ..for certain..it's not anyones else's understanding to do with than your own .

:angel:

Thank you from the heart Agape, this is a great truth, something we must be reminded of constantly! love peace and joy to all my brothers and sisters.

[Positive Vibe Merchant]

I love your words Agape. truly and always from the heart, and wanting the best for all humanity. You are a wonderful spirit.

[Cidersomerset]

A lot of things get mixed together when different
researchers start interpreting different subjects.
If the Archons exist, David explains his interpretation
from agnostic source, it does sound like the Greys.


THE ARCHONS ~ David Icke

Published on 11 Sep 2013
The Archons by any other name may be a Reptilian, Jinn or Demon.


iCNeuYE7rM8

[Ron Mauer Sr]

Indeed I shall in spirit and maybe if I get the chance and conditions are right I might ARV them. Watched the small vid. OK, the guy talks, but does not say much, you can infer what you will on that. Not impressed. Problem being anyone whom comes into the public domain now has at their feet everything via the internet. Its far too easy these days to read about stuff and concoct a pretty reasonable claim or set of claims. I do not buy it sorry, very wary of anyone coming forward in last few years. We need grill them moreso than in the past, simply because they repeat all that's out there adding their color to it. I simply do not trust these newcomers as being authentic.

Serious question here. As everyone's personal discernment seems to be different from every other persons discernment.

What criteria would you use to determine authenticity in this kind of thing?

When the intuitive and rational minds agree, yet remain open to new data, that is the best we can do in the moment.

Truth is usually mixed with distortions in this reality. So it is important to not throw out the baby with the bath water.