View Full Version : Mi 7.8 BOUGAINVILLE REGION, P.N.G.
EMSC
19th April 2014, 13:40
Magnitude Mi 7.8Region BOUGAINVILLE REGION, P.N.G.Date time 2014-04-19 13:28:02.0 UTCLocation 6.87 S ; 154.95 EDepth 40 km
More... (http://www.emsc-csem.org/Earthquake/earthquake.php?id=373317)
Tesseract
19th April 2014, 14:09
Tsunami warning issued..
Tesla_WTC_Solution
19th April 2014, 15:27
This is so surreal :(*
Fairy Friend
19th April 2014, 15:58
Last night's quake came on schedule but here is another one. We are definitely going to need a much bigger graph to plot all these 2014 quakes. A much bigger graph if it keeps up.
Fairy Friend
19th April 2014, 21:40
The way things are going I would not be surprised if a magnitude 8 pops next anytime now but thinking 4-6hrs.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
19th April 2014, 22:24
did they say what caused the everest avalanche? :(
The avalanche struck at the Khumbu Icefall, a treacherous passage between Base Camp and Camp 1 riddled with crevasses and columns of ice known as seracs, Adrian Ballinger of California-based Alpenglow Expeditions said.
"In many ways it's always the most dangerous part of the mountain to climb, because the ice is constantly moving, there's so many crevasses and seracs where you need to use ladders and ropes to get through the very technical terrain," he said.
The area is nicknamed the "popcorn field" for its bulging chucks of ice and is just below Camp 2, Ang Tshering of the Nepal Mountaineering Association said.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/mount-everest-avalanche-causes-deadliest-climbing-disaster-on-worlds-highest-peak-20140418-zqwen.html#ixzz2zNDcz4ac
The previous worst accident occurred on May 11, 1996, when eight climbers were killed over a two-day period during a rogue storm while attempting to climb the mountain. That tragedy was immortalised in the best-selling book Into Thin Air by US mountaineering journalist Jon Krakauer.
Six Nepalese guides were killed in an avalanche in 1970.
Read more: http://www.smh.com.au/world/mount-everest-avalanche-causes-deadliest-climbing-disaster-on-worlds-highest-peak-20140418-zqwen.html#ixzz2zNDiJc2R
there was a "blood moon" i think about a month before the 1996 avalanche,
i.e. earth experienced Syzygy with moon and sun that month.
not sure if related at all, but the last most deadly accident on Everest was within 1 month and a few days of the Blood Moon eclipse of 1996.
i was wondering if the Syzygy had impact on TIDAL FORCES that could DISPLACE or affect ice flows on everest :(
eek scary m i rite?
it was "total" i.e. perfect syzygy or close enough
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/April_1996_lunar_eclipse
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/commons/thumb/7/79/Lunar_eclipse_chart_close-1996Apr04.png/320px-Lunar_eclipse_chart_close-1996Apr04.png
edit: "real" scientists don't believe in syzygy apparently
but I do... i believe a lot of strange things about gravity...
like rocks being displaced will affect the ice lay and cause an avalanche when it settles again
which would be delayed by weeks imo given certain conditions.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
19th April 2014, 22:50
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Syzygy_%28astronomy%29
In astronomy, a syzygy /ˈsɪzɨdʒi/ (from the Ancient Greek suzugos (σύζυγος) meaning, "yoked together"[2]) is a straight-line configuration of three celestial bodies in a gravitational system.[3] The word is often used in reference to the Sun, Earth and either the Moon or a planet, where the latter is in conjunction or opposition. Solar and lunar eclipses occur at times of syzygy, as do transits and occultations. The term is often applied when the Sun and Moon are in conjunction (new moon) or opposition (full moon).[4]
The word syzygy is often loosely used to describe interesting configurations of planets in general. For example, one such case occurred on March 21, 1894 around 23:00 GMT, when Mercury transited the Sun as seen from Venus, and Mercury and Venus both simultaneously transited the Sun as seen from Saturn. It is also used to describe situations when all the planets are on the same side of the Sun although they are not necessarily in a straight line, such as on March 10, 1982.[5]
An occultation occurs when an apparently larger body passes the next planet in front of an apparently smaller one. A transit occurs when a smaller body passes in front of a larger one. In the combined case where the smaller body regularly transits the larger object, an occultation is also termed a secondary eclipse.
An eclipse occurs when a body disappears or partially disappears from view, either by an occultation, as with a solar eclipse, or by passing into the shadow of another body, as with a lunar eclipse (thus both are listed on NASA's eclipse page).
Transits, occultations and eclipses in general are all effects of a syzygy.
Transits and occultations of the sun by Earth's moon are called solar eclipses regardless of whether the sun is completely or partially covered. By extension, transits of the sun by a satellite of a planet may also be called eclipses, as with the transits of Phobos and Deimos shown on NASA's JPL photojournal, as may the passage of a satellite into the planet's shadow, as with this eclipse of Phobos. The term eclipse is also used more generally for bodies passing in front of one another. For example, a NASA Astronomy Picture of the Day refers to the Moon eclipsing and occulting Saturn interchangeably.
The gravitational effects of syzygies on planets, especially Earth, are still being studied. It is known that the gravitational stress on the Moon during a Sun–Earth–Moon syzygy can trigger a moonquake, a seismic event on the Moon similar in some ways to an earthquake.[6] So far, no evidence has been found that the Sun–Earth–Moon syzygy can trigger earthquakes. It is considered highly unlikely that any correlation between syzygy and earthquakes exists. This is because Earth is 82 times more massive than the Moon, and thus the gravitational force on Earth from the Moon is trivial compared to the mass of Earth.[7][8]
There is no controversy about the effect of a syzygy on ocean tides. The syzygy produces the more powerful spring tide due to the enhanced gravitational effect of the Sun added to the Moon's gravitational pull. The spring tides (highest tides) occur at full moon and new moon times while the neap tides (lowest tides) occur when the sun and moon are at right angles in the first and third quarters of the moon's cycle. Spring and neap tides are about 20% higher and lower, respectively, than normal tides.[9]
________________________
to Tesla ice and mountains etc are a grey area and imo everyone has been lying about syzygy not causing trouble
'don't panic' SCREW THEM...
p.s. the boobs at USGS are so far behind the reality :(
Fairy Friend
19th April 2014, 23:45
Yesterday M-class Flair is what's set most of this in motion. While I am tracking something else not syzygy . This is not pressure from plates slamming in to each other either. Same time of day, like clockwork implies something different. Like clockwork alignment are big windows like the hours of a clock, the moon's gravitational force and sun like the minutes, this is like seconds in the scheme of things. This is a ripple.
Fairy Friend
20th April 2014, 00:05
I do not know about whether this syzygy contribute or trigger an avalanche. We've had such a long hard winter where I'm from that snow is kind of a four letter word. We're trying not to bring it up at all. I think other forces are the trumps there. I think global warming as my first thought.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
20th April 2014, 01:18
I do not know about whether this syzygy contribute or trigger an avalanche. We've had such a long hard winter where I'm from that snow is kind of a four letter word. We're trying not to bring it up at all. I think other forces are the trumps there. I think global warming as my first thought.
well, looking at the time of year and the dates of the eclipses,
i'd say lots of factors lined up --
what happens to ice under heavy tidal forces when it starts to lose strength in spring?
:(
Fairy Friend
20th April 2014, 01:28
That's a good question especially when you're talking glaciers. there's so much snow on top of snow that underneath the pressure so great that it behaves more like fluid it at times then ice so could very well be. Is anyone tracking that?
But I see we got a earth quake one hour ahead of schedule so my prediction was right on the money in my book. Which was not a psychic prediction but I was crunching numbers. (I do combine the two) This is not typical. Once again between 1900 and midnight.
I did not hear anything else about the tsunami warning so I assumed that they cancel that. That is a tsunami prone area.
Tesla_WTC_Solution
20th April 2014, 01:41
the thread aviators just posted is a bit scary -- i don't really follow it that closely anymore,
but it's about the upswing in frequency/severity of the EQs recently :(
"hold onto your butts" ~Jurassic Park
:P
Powered by vBulletin™ Version 4.1.1 Copyright © 2026 vBulletin Solutions, Inc. All rights reserved.