GuyFox
23rd April 2014, 02:25
Affirmative Action may be Ending
Welcome to a "more fair" and less govt-controlled economy? Or not?
There are bound to be different reactions to the News - but let's put it out there.
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled 6-2 that...
STATES MAY END RACIAL PREFERENCES without violating the constitution*.
So "the finger on the scales of Justice" may be lifted (as some might say),
or
"The assistance from the state to redress historical injustices" may soon be over.
How do YOU see it ??
======
* US supreme court upholds Michigan law that bans affirmative action
The Guardian-by Dan Roberts-3 hours ago
A ban on affirmative action policies that favour minority students has been upheld by the US supreme court, in a ruling that racial equality ...
> http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/apr/22/us-supreme-court-michigan-affirmative-action
For the record:
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed a dissent.
And Elena Kagan was recused.
Two separate concurring opinions were filed by the other Justices
Welcome to a "more fair" and less govt-controlled economy? Or not?
There are bound to be different reactions to the News - but let's put it out there.
The US Supreme Court on Tuesday ruled 6-2 that...
STATES MAY END RACIAL PREFERENCES without violating the constitution*.
So "the finger on the scales of Justice" may be lifted (as some might say),
or
"The assistance from the state to redress historical injustices" may soon be over.
How do YOU see it ??
======
* US supreme court upholds Michigan law that bans affirmative action
The Guardian-by Dan Roberts-3 hours ago
A ban on affirmative action policies that favour minority students has been upheld by the US supreme court, in a ruling that racial equality ...
> http://www.theguardian.com/law/2014/apr/22/us-supreme-court-michigan-affirmative-action
For the record:
Justices Sonia Sotomayor, and Ruth Bader Ginsburg filed a dissent.
And Elena Kagan was recused.
Two separate concurring opinions were filed by the other Justices