What hit the moon on 21st March 2014?

[uclock]

Hi all,

I came across this piece of news. I think mainstream media is either unaware of it or they are delibirately trying to keep this quiet. The interesting thing is, if you own a telescope you can check this out for youself.

http://gettingreadyfor2015.wordpress.com/2014/04/24/nasa-moon-collision-cover-up/

The truth is there, so enjoy the hunt!:confused:

uclock

[Matt P]

Not a big science guy but there seems to be a bigger question that is not addressed in this article or video. The speaker wonders what were the objects. I think the bigger question is, "What did they hit?" The crust of the earth and moon should be relatively soft, no? At least compared to an object of this size moving at this speed. If this object struck earth at this speed, for example, the earth is not hard/dense enough to allow an object to skip off of it. Instead, it would bury itself deep into the crust. That these objects were able to skip so many times so easily across the lunar surface tells me that surface is very hard/dense. That might explain why NASA (that lovely military agency) wouldn't bring attention to it. Doing so might show that the moon might not be what they say it is. Remember, our moon is far too big to be our moon. Isn't it the largest moon compared to it's host planet in this solar system? Shouldn't it be too heavy to be our satellite if it was solid? And I believe they crashed a satellite into the moon decades ago and word was it rung like a bell (echoed again and again), as if it was hollow.
Just food for thought.
Shame we live in a world where everything has to be a bloody secret. Wouldn't it be cool if all the governments and institutions of the world could openly share and debate such amazing events?

Matt

[andrewgreen]

Not a big science guy but there seems to be a bigger question that is not addressed in this article or video. The speaker wonders what were the objects. I think the bigger question is, "What did they hit?" The crust of the earth and moon should be relatively soft, no? At least compared to an object of this size moving at this speed. If this object struck earth at this speed, for example, the earth is not hard/dense enough to allow an object to skip off of it. Instead, it would bury itself deep into the crust. That these objects were able to skip so many times so easily across the lunar surface tells me that surface is very hard/dense. That might explain why NASA (that lovely military agency) wouldn't bring attention to it. Doing so might show that the moon might not be what they say it is. Remember, our moon is far too big to be our moon. Isn't it the largest moon compared to it's host planet in this solar system? Shouldn't it be too heavy to be our satellite if it was solid? And I believe they crashed a satellite into the moon decades ago and word was it rung like a bell (echoed again and again), as if it was hollow.
Just food for thought.
Shame we live in a world where everything has to be a bloody secret. Wouldn't it be cool if all the governments and institutions of the world could openly share and debate such amazing events?

Matt


All entirely possible but the far stronger gravity on earth would also be a key influencing factor at impact.

[Sidney]

I don't know why the guy is so surprised that NASA isn't talking? NASA is just another alphabet agency, and they all lie, and cover, and lie some more, and ignore, and cover, if they ignore something then is doesn't exist. Nothing new. People have been filming ufos for decades, and the govt and NASA still aren't talking. Same shiit different day.

[araucaria]

I am wondering why this guy keeps saying the Moon's diameter is 26 hundred miles when it is actually 2160 miles. Is he mixing it up with the weight of the object (26 hundred million tonnes)? Still, it's a strange mistake for an astronomer to be making...

If this story is true, (and frankly, I did not find his images very clear at all), then it would bring into question what we think about the Moon in another way. If whole strings of craters are formed in one go, then that would considerably alter anything derived from the number of craters. Either the Moon is much younger, or cratering events are much less frequent than we thought - or both.

[uclock]

Hi all,

Ok, let’s do some math to discover the velocity of the object. The moons diameter according to Wikipedia is about 3,474 km or 3,474,000m although his field of view was reduced, so let us say his field of view is approximately 3,000,000m. I use meters because I find it easier.
The object covered this distance in 5 sec so 3,000,000m/5sec = 600,000ms^-1. For those who like mph this equates to some 373miles per second or 1,343,000 mph. There aren’t many, if any, objects moving at that kind of speed in our solar system, that alone should worry NASA.
Any object that hit the moon at such a shallow angle moving at that velocity and survived the impact should have bounced back into space because this is well above the escape velocity of the moon. The fact that it has left craters without releasing any energy in the form of explosions, and it never slowed down after each impact and it carried on hitting the moons surface goes against known physics.
Could you imagine the devastation if it had hit the Earth?
As soon as the moon comes up I will be having a look for these craters with my telescope and I’ll let you know what I find.

uclock

[uclock]

Hi all,
I have managed to have a good look at Mare Imbrium with my telescope around the area described in the video but found no new craters. It just goes to show that you can't believe everything, even if the person telling you something is sincere.

uclock