Why was Bill Clinton so stressed about UFOs?

[bogeyman]

Bill Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” – where he was asked about his interest in UFOs – has been subjected to body-language analysis by an investigator of paranormal claims, who says the former president exhibited signs of “significant apprehension, stress, and guarded behavior.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/what-has-bill-clinton-so-stressed-about-ufos/#LOIEHOVWzHzqISTH.99


Video clip provided.

[Cardillac]

maybe it has to do with what Joseph Farrell extremely emphatically stated in his latest interview (2 hrs. +) on the ByteShow.com- I've never before heard Farrell almost "lose it" like he does in this interview when he gets into the bit that might be the cause for Clinton's apprehension and stress; although very lengthy the interview is more than worth the time (Farrell is always worth the time); but be sure to fasten your seat belt and drink a stiff one before listening...

Larry

[Davidallany]

Bill Clinton’s appearance earlier this month on “Jimmy Kimmel Live!” – where he was asked about his interest in UFOs – has been subjected to body-language analysis by an investigator of paranormal claims, who says the former president exhibited signs of “significant apprehension, stress, and guarded behavior.”

Read more at http://www.wnd.com/2014/05/what-has-bill-clinton-so-stressed-about-ufos/#LOIEHOVWzHzqISTH.99


Video clip provided.
Maybe he was just stressed out in general, or maybe he was putting a face on. These people are professional actors.Hollywood actors can act in front of a camera or a small crowd for entertainment purposes most do not belong to the inner circle club. While big shot politicians who do belong to the inner circle club, can act in front of the whole world and lie through their teeth without arousing any suspicions, thanks to a combination of hours upon hours of practice, lack of morality and complete absence of decency. Basically the 10 commandments do not apply to them, but do to some seven billion humans.

[DeDukshyn]

I can humour, at least until I learn better, that world leaders are always told by those who control them that we are on the edge of an alien invasion. Imagine the control that would assert of his decision making. Operating out of a continued "survival" state ....

Just an idea ;)

[onawah]

Is this the one you are referring to:
Yb4km0Gpp1A
http://thefreedomreport.us/joseph-p-farrell-cosmic-war-byte-show-april-24-2014/
maybe it has to do with what Joseph Farrell extremely emphatically stated in his latest interview (2 hrs. +) on the ByteShow.com- I've never before heard Farrell almost "lose it" like he does in this interview when he gets into the bit that might be the cause for Clinton's apprehension and stress; although very lengthy the interview is more than worth the time (Farrell is always worth the time); but be sure to fasten your seat belt and drink a stiff one before listening...

Larry

[jake gittes]

"big shot politicians who do belong to the inner circle club, can act in front of the whole world and lie through their teeth without arousing any suspicions, thanks to a combination of hours upon hours of practice, lack of morality and complete absence of decency. Basically the 10 commandments do not apply to them, but do to some seven billion humans."

Great point, David, although I thought "W" was a terrible actor, mainly because he's so dumb. He would make his "thoughtful" expression which screamed "lacking thoughts" to me.

[ghostrider]

presidents are very much mind controlled , they could have induced a stressful reaction in him when the word UFO comes up , to keep the public reacting to his reaction , like he knows something he is not telling ... keeping the conspiracy alive ... wagging the dog and controlling the narrative in the alternative media circles ...

[bruno dante]

Clinton seemed cool as a cucumber to me, honestly.

[ThePythonicCow]

Is this the one you are referring to
Thanks!

I was not subscribed to GeorgeAnn Hughes TheByteShow Youtube channel (https://www.youtube.com/user/TheByteShowChannel), so had not noticed that she and Joseph had begun a number of new shows.

I've now fixed that omission on my part, subscribed to her Youtube channel, and begun listening.

¤=[Post Update]=¤


maybe it has to do with what Joseph Farrell extremely emphatically stated in his latest interview (2 hrs. +) on the ByteShow.com- I've never before heard Farrell almost "lose it" like he does in this interview when he gets into the bit that might be the cause for Clinton's apprehension and stress
Do you have more details as to which of his several recent ByteShow interviews with GeorgeAnn Hughes, and where in that interview? As you can see from here (https://www.youtube.com/user/TheByteShowChannel), there have been several :).

[Andrew]

Think it is this one..


http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=bswXzfqLTrw

Also the full list of Farrell shows from the byte show are listed here (http://www.thebyteshow.com/JosephPFarrell.html)

[bogeyman]

All the Presidents are briefed on the UFO subject (not really a term used now), they are not informed of the whole situation, frankly they do not have a high enough security clearance for some of the data. Kennedy is alleged to have say to a employee on a plane, when asked about UFOs, he stated basically, he wished he could inform the public about the "alien thing" but my "hands are tied".

[ThePythonicCow]

Think it is this one..

...
Also the full list of Farrell shows from the byte show are listed here (http://www.thebyteshow.com/JosephPFarrell.html)
Could well be. Several of the recently uploaded videos are repeated uploads of older material (the lack of dates makes this not obvious.) The "Cultural Transitions, Part 27" video you displayed above is at least quite recent, referring to the recent incident between the USS Donald Cook and a Russian bomber in the Black Sea, when the Russians blanked the Aegis radar.

Also it seems that not all of TheByteShow's with Farrell are on the page you like. For example, only 10 Cultural Transition shows are listed, but it seems we are now up to "Cultural Transitions, Part 27".

[ThePythonicCow]

maybe it has to do with what Joseph Farrell extremely emphatically stated in his latest interview (2 hrs. +) on the ByteShow.com- I've never before heard Farrell almost "lose it" like he does in this interview when he gets into the bit that might be the cause for Clinton's apprehension and stress


Is this the one you are referring to


Think it is this one.
Yup - that's the one. View Joseph P Farrell, Cultural Transitions, Part 27 (TheByteShow) (http://youtu.be/bswXzfqLTrw?t=1h17m49s), starting at 1:17:49, to 1:18:48. I don't notice whatever you were referring to, Cadillac, by Farrell losing it.

===

P.S. -- If you can spare the 3 hours, I recommend listening to this one. It's good. Farrell presents some possibilities on what is going on with the bastards in power, the Anglo-Americans versus the BRICS, the necessary change in our current petro-based monetary system when we change from petro based energy to "black ops physics" based energy. Setting off nuclear bombs at the end of World War II apparently attracted the attention of some aliens, and it may be in the best interests of earthlings to gain technological and physics parity with potentially hostile aliens rapidly. Farrell also figures that the effort to get to a one world government isn't working so well, so the powers that be on this planet are going back to the Cold War style contest of two major powers in order to manage humanity and their nations.

[Andrew]

Think it is this one..

...
Also the full list of Farrell shows from the byte show are listed here (http://www.thebyteshow.com/JosephPFarrell.html)
Could well be. Several of the recently uploaded videos are repeated uploads of older material (the lack of dates makes this not obvious.) The "Cultural Transitions, Part 27" video you displayed above is at least quite recent, referring to the recent incident between the USS Donald Cook and a Russian bomber in the Black Sea, when the Russians blanked the Aegis radar.

Also it seems that not all of TheByteShow's with Farrell are on the page you like. For example, only 10 Cultural Transition shows are listed, but it seems we are now up to "Cultural Transitions, Part 27".

Yes the ordering is very annoying. Having the dates would make it much easier to identify new material (although some do). But cultural transitions 10 is the number 27 from youtube :confused:

[bogeyman]

Maybe Bill was worried about the consequences of any breach in security as a result of anything he says. What happens behind closed door in secret recess or courts is another reason to feel uneasy.

[Bill Ryan]

The "Cultural Transitions, Part 27" video you displayed above is at least quite recent, referring to the recent incident between the USS Donald Cook and a Russian bomber in the Black Sea, when the Russians blanked the Aegis radar.



I was interested enough in this fascinating (and important) claim to track down the source. It's here, from the Voice of Russia Radio website, and seems to be fully documented and legitimate -- interestingly, NOT reported at all in the western media:

http://indian.ruvr.ru/2014_04_21/Russian-Su-24-scores-off-against-the-American-USS-Donald-Cook-5786





Russian Su-24 scores off against the American "USS Donald Cook"


http://cdn.ruvr.ru/2014/04/21/1505240080/9RIAN_00185088.LR.ru.jpg


Russian Sukhoi Su 24 with the newest jamming complex paralyzed in the Black Sea the most modern American combat management system "Aegis" installed on the destroyer "USS Donald Cook". Pavel Zolotarev, Deputy Director, Institute of USA and Canada, shares details about this version which is being actively discussed in the Russian media and by bloggers.

US destroyer "Donald Cook" with cruise missiles "Tomahawk" entered the neutral waters of the Black Sea on April 10. The purpose was a demonstration of force and intimidation in connection with the position of Russia in Ukraine and Crimea. The appearance of American warships in these waters is in contradiction of the Montreux Convention about the nature and duration of stay in the Black Sea by the military ships of countries not washed by this sea.

In response, Russia sent an unarmed bomber Su-24 to fly around the U.S. destroyer. However, experts say that this plane was equipped with the latest Russian electronic warfare complex. According to this version, "Aegis" spotted from afar the approaching aircraft, and sounded alarm. Everything went normally, American radars calculated the speed of the approaching target. And suddenly all the screens went blank. "Aegis" was not working any more, and the rockets could not get target information. Meanwhile, Su-24 flew over the deck of the destroyer, did battle turn and simulated missile attack on the target. Then it turned and repeated the maneuver. And did so 12 times.

Apparently, all efforts to revive the "Aegis" and provide target information for the defence failed. Russia's reaction to military pressure from the United States was profoundly calm, feels the Russian political scientist Pavel Zolotarev:

The demonstration was original enough. A bomber without any weapons, but having onboard equipment for jamming enemy radar, worked against a destroyer equipped with "Aegis", the most modern system of air and missile defence. But this system of mobile location, in this case the ship, has a significant drawback. That is, the target tracking capabilities. They work well when there is a number of these ships which can coordinate with each other somehow. In this case there was just one destroyer. And, apparently, the algorithm of the radar in the "Aegis” system on the destroyer did not load under the influence of jamming by the Su-24. It was therefore not only a nervous reaction to the fact of flying around by the Russian bomber which was common practice during the Cold War. The reaction of the Americans was due to the fact that most modern system, especially its informative or radar part, did not work adequately. Therefore, there was such a nervous reaction to the whole episode.
After the incident, the foreign media reported that "Donald Cook" was rushed into a port in Romania. There all the 27 members of the crew filed a letter of resignation. It seems that all 27 people have written that they are not going to risk their lives. This is indirectly confirmed by the Pentagon statement according to which the action demoralized the crew of the American ship.

What are the possible consequences of the incident provoked by the U.S. in the Black Sea? Pavel Zolotarev forecasts:

I think that Americans are somehow going to reflect on improving the system “Aegis". This is a purely military aspect. In political terms, there is hardly any likelihood of demonstrative steps by either side. That is enough. Meanwhile, for Americans it is a very unpleasant moment. In general, the missile defence system which they deploy involves huge expenditures. They have to prove each time that it is necessary to allocate funds from the budget. At the same time, the ground component of the ABM was tested in ideal conditions and showed a low efficiency. This fact is concealed by the Pentagon. The most modern component, the sea-based system "Aegis" also showed its shortcomings in the present case.
The system with which the Russian Su-24 shocked the American destroyer "Donald Cook" has the code name "Khibiny". This is the name of the mountain range on the Kola Peninsula in the Arctic Circle. "Khibiny" is the newest complex for radioelectronic jamming of the enemy. They will be installed on all the advanced Russian planes.

Recently the complex has undergone regular testing exercises on the ground in Buryatia. Apparently, the tests which were conducted under conditions as close to real as possible, were successful.

[bogeyman]

There are a few other websites mentioning the story but not that fact that Su 24 jammed the radar. Belfast News, Stripes to name just a few. It is interesting how these things remain quiet isn't it?

The SU 24 is a relatively old aircraft so I wonder whether some propaganda is at play here.

[Hervé]

[...]

... NOT reported at all in the western media:

http://indian.ruvr.ru/2014_04_21/Russian-Su-24-scores-off-against-the-American-USS-Donald-Cook-5786

[...]

Indeed, however not gone un-noticed by a few eagle eyes:


I wonder who else has got a toy that makes plane disappear...


Russian Su-24 scores off against the American "USS Donald Cook"


http://cdn.ruvr.ru/2014/04/21/1505240080/9RIAN_00185088.LR.ru.jpg


[...]

"Aegis" was not working any more, and the rockets could not get target information. Meanwhile, Su-24 flew over the deck of the destroyer, did battle turn and simulated missile attack on the target. Then it turned and repeated the maneuver. And did so 12 times.

Read more: http://indian.ruvr.ru/2014_04_21/Russian-Su-24-scores-off-against-the-American-USS-Donald-Cook-5786/

... so, some people got red into their faces...

... others turned to a whiter shade of pale...

¤=[Post Update]=¤


[...]

The SU 24 is a relatively old aircraft so I wonder whether some propaganda is at play here.

... means they could turn ANY aircraft invisible to western tech...